ML20094K333
Text
. -,..,.-,. - - a. -
~. :- +
L.
,.~ [
m ~ 3.m. - l
^
I L. M8bdng sinnes c}. smpodidt t,obdalsh CKo i4b
?Rio A D D EC % W l9.
"Il*I*
L
.n dXane.,3(o 3c)f/
ADNLM,gk bdwdw hokhbePd-h ElechvicaQ
%% bon Deci
- - s.-N.e _ _ Mewe drmib ?rowded in 7de<en c e._.
m.-
4 b.t W 3 45_
M i J e im T4 Ws s
e,j
^
-]
yg i
Jol it m3 M uk j @.c,,d. G df meab i
(,
15 h ht, mMol anoaettag dees to M )
t Mh M ino Yea g h o y t h M n. d 5,%
3 4
wL_np
.x
.O,
Tab M D & yinnin3 Sm se4 to GooM.
i l
...)
l l Dd. n,h 8 TMo.
__.._______.__l G
) A a s p, w a l _ o 4,r'- n'"3 a c c-
~
- *k_
?"' ' 4 " I {"****
- b'Vb9
"" U '
- *m
}
any cu'ps ok
) u Ngde sg)Sen% b~~
i %3* I dVM r*s@vN A
- A it 3 a
,gg g gg
{*d
%W Vt.htt 8(ve,h(9d CnNCd kE9A N hnd)4. que5hionuNhIl ht, t 4e fd\\N[oNr t % caosons FWf-ygynov1t 011 % h idl \\ Ye uf eg,<,,yd se,t.p B wbc)h ges 9tuctolore hv vwderpwnin) i 8408150022 8407IO
% M CAM d Y*uuff. Q 25WF
~ ~
~
?
~
~"
~ ~ -
- - - ~ - - - - _ = - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,
f
.g gy g
,._,.,,,,m.,
. n- -.
i s.[ to l
1 Corih.
i nh 0 11 og
\\h dtwA.
R n Cits bgaa oe *W s sw had miV W
%w,im so.sse J
, m - e.i 3 w 4 %,ir 4 %
u%.n,1m th co.
w ws,s.wa w 9w g Se, w e reowaly e l
' or. At
"'E i O[V iD *M wdI h*
h g
1.,%., Rytt.
Inh Rpf,7 i
h.9 j
k.ll,1M gg, C*1 Wgig @g.~Ib hw) k ks.95 b 87 A uws.sp,,,3 p Latht.
i wa. 24 3
A.n.n n i
3 Sea.g.14 A C,k wt3 Cedrdediori ScQultg i
i I
sM,
. :i 3
^
4
- I y
n,
{
I ii _.._
~ * * * * ' ~
g..
,4,gg j '
- ~j-n
-:.7.-; 1 -
~
- p,., ys.. h.. 3_... - J.
.....;.- -,; r
., L,y.g g{
~
m.
- - - - - - = s - -
, __ i[...
24 t,
~
sitslei
- y'
~
IJA J,om % A d il h Lce_
~
3.h.
Pe<m j
-aNWm-bdos mA G46+,4".* pk=d m.,_
ie-e-
+
- eWN
+
_ a m
.io,,w g% A.4 5 Jew ym m
g sa.~ w,
"" eeIV ed 6B W
i bh "N pw Na%.,
3 o.)13p-ne d-
_a
\\m m.s'
.:ieA,. d-64. b k%pse ho$ -%bm4=J 4"h 1" n
.ui,3..iy.
W p *C. O f h rieN SO Onalsjs65 wN bt. Phrywigd
+
4i6,4 q
.{.< y u M e -
MkV k f)C'4Crose ITO W4]
e%fvg QC4 ty'g3 dit 1
4 rya <oa4 m % w. aa,-,,b e n.s sg o.asAAisaam 4ov S I
j g,(
hj g AL qW h 4-% % o< 24.5
~ ~~~~
,, s t-d
- S y.e,n % s. m, sa.-4 w s
k g
gg g
~
kMM,gQ pt {er sbciv<e.s (Cd, d locre, i
oa m ; r a m sw n a m.ne psi.d<J
- -- yy 1
i i
i 4
I 7- -
E2.
' YY
^
J ' " ~ L~~~ TIZ.1.
~;1_ _._.
l -~1.-
!!! 'i-lJ !'JUN
w- ~ -m
., m -.. _.
9r,4c.-, ;.v-
- s.......; i ;.:------- _
... ~., n y r q.;,
3 1_
_____i._.__--.-
^ "
j__ _
~ '
~~
s.. to 5}tel%
s m-.
- w;w; xpxu m-~
- z I
m
~m S."1 kerweVM G>t$ge 4 M
Oh i
g em z._ w w
.9
+e+
. m.
m
- j y
a i
e-.e e.
-emm-
~
i
)1esd Od. bage.,TOEts (dhnmh x!
%.gm9 3
C=adk
\\\\usuda9 tanct
< su
) h t4 S.%w%-
6
% m-6t= mmmu aw.,.m+ u.5 j
wu Sn w wd v W o.
e, L
%%N
% 4 d adep.h.,
L..
.'. q
=- -- - -. -. -
9
'"*6-W8 t
l
,,. _. _.. ~,..,..
~
- ~ ~ - - ~ ~
~ ~ - ~ ~ ' ' -
~*
- ar **
- g~
m =
+= ~ s j,.y ow
,s.
,., a _
.r-
,_e-
-* t '; +
?*
.P~**
' ~
-w'e' ".- " -
,9,,. ~ _m 33333gg
- "'c..
A.p, n
sp tei
~,.
n f. _ _ h o mear b b e
. kede.YtnCR _ __..__
krombedtwM*b/ewce..._
me
.-4
.-.w e.
- _.,49
-~++
- . 'b.lUJp,mt Taas._ N"5MS "'*"
~il i3 whthWi@ gem > uw A *,,,~e m.sga bA8 Me s M ad A g a g "*'I* Man t
w gy d Dd.25%, T4.5 M% i 9
mi t
4 l k.Np Tob102 1f
~
~
a 1,..Q2 iT.b %
\\,
.+
/
.I o..
X %.gpg/Tbio m;;
7 Y --
n -)e M If (9tuerihd%MI)1% ti$ mech n
'J 3
hgWM..___ _.._ __ ijsg4{
4 ) ear org i
sb m mg,t.,n1a J.,s L ou _.o W
.c h4 iaJ e ihV V
w ae. ww a.,.mm.3,u,.-- 1 bd.tymI k-.
y y,w.o A prued e
n-E y
,.-.. peg mg.
-..w
.h w***e
.*'W-+
U g
"g ie e
v
.r gy p
=
r 6.
pA g
g, M,
-g
,_a g
--b f er7
...w-n+ ~
-n~~---
~ ~-yp mny=
= -
=a a.;
5\\iglen y4 5.Flo 2
^
M..
b h
bhO o,;
.o.
,Q g
~~~(? f Sg Q f1
- 16W*fY~ ~~~~
@ - %wse,w% To% iw s.ari.s.% e
. 3 r a~
w d a w m m s u.o w m a = =
-y umm.
MO D E9) A m RE w o d rapgdej $< b ried % --
. 7 4-my
- e
%.,a. 5 A. 4 % i v e. %,,5
& w,astpe h cables D,
-% e4 abbh WJ Nosdt wbdi idrar %9 aa inhu:f ~
t 3
FNfMF hk,t u
+3. Am_8at Y)
~
l hw 1
r a
.t
' r s..
hipgqhyh\\M g hh)w']is 1.Anw
~
2'- 2 : b%%
'b g.4 g 3,
-VS g
gsg. <.
u d. %u s. 4*u w w a.-a. a
-s A
bine bi
.g OM.
=M<s.b9eMed c.% h duceike dessy {.ohnes t4w N
a
.u..
yp3 v,<
A li, s v.,4 v 6,% Q.%sy - % %cx vwsaa,.t., wsT E w%uessws leaks
%s
% skuc.hd
+-
=.
e
r----
c.m 3_.._,...._..
.mca sc
.s.,_
.- l;.... ; _
Q
- 4. 1
. -.., ~. _ _. -.. - - - -
._. _... _. - -.. _. _ _..... -. ~. _.. _ _... _. -... - _, -.... _. -, -,.
+ - nn
~
, ; -+pq - eyn y..--..,.-+
. - -.. +q~-----
qqyg
. -. =.. = =. - -. -..
]
- '~~-
shcleg
.;- y :
6-9. %
c.\\
" l-$:
e hNl ic@ to n h-ykevih Eh htm.kbE4?*t 4..
.. _ _ _. _ _ _ =
NM M
TifMfL AML Ih d
.j - k.h D h 6&a,,hs g4. g%g.hanAmveshak --
b
- g
- q.,_._.- % 1 4,4c.m.ni3 My _ _ _ _. _.
$~
gy' Cecrq $ b Q semaaLi c~ts > ss.,.,,u win w su ia i-s.
.;4
[4&l}h%
jCOOCfIW ~
b (hb gCOF1C#II,I" CIDf.1%
VJOJ
'8=
e ae.e.
wv.h j
ee.
w.
ca.S,a uL g, ac.sy pow wt so s4 reysses %
4 em g w cy,w. p a m t o hms m r-:I Ara,% w h d4u wi&cahd a d d a & % % dind do
- NW
?.....
_ - _ _ _ _ _._ o @._.
44 u
9.a 1 4s. * + w aLeo m
omh k sm axh kk
.g,.
-. s.a u yen anin< s,&
- ~
- - - c<,%<isw w tA vs s9 % cribn. u ta - -
~ - - - - -
V
-- MM M ErwED A Dr.h W's e)m3N R M M6 Cenoc,TE.h_
ENT1REA.1 AT E MPucMT
^*
.4e_.
i.-
b I
- ;.a.....
._ fw_, m.t q -
- m ;_-.
Jgj p.e
R f. ',[,ll j % I: Y h S $ E C,% f 7 R v " 7 Z7 3 [ " *33fg37%,+di W
3
- : :.e.
AhkA*h[h-f
~A
__MeedV1._Je;%een.NR.C. k CPCo _on_$ondi[._2tohb J
1
__])(es- _--
yD.Mdhu_sveme3 A5klW
@ 3fre. L. Summary Auxo 21t31.b.
(tg j
w.
m 7. A4 k sm.,.m.--KJo go4e.mte in Summay. zi n.q_._.
D 1 i.f.<~6..
i.
(,,, 39 r
x..
. h h t g
, h 19 p&b,L.---
g
-h9.eJ80.g(t)o
'f7 7,t on SollFIXE5 mag %Ilc j
itO9-_
b e A o - so.ss(N. =4-k.'d,MI/866dtup' l
.3e.l.3psesmQ
- BEraE
_ _. _. _... go
[q i.ll4-39. _ COE3nih 2dt.1,y4,Sumrnar$ zlkm) l I
L.
__ilb(Bo tu,u o b b d.-
b
- h..
FM mscJup%h p.,-Q< 114 se /c wc.
- 24. %
- t. itM9 3
ikUtb %0 6gdyConulbg,, s,A(.Sv madr 3 3165 o)4,a 3
0
- 7.,w m.ey'p g9 w<%
c, e_,,t 1
,.d 3,t\\DO mhNasNa (keseddo,kh.he ho, SQ b 9ed $
3
$j3 MHLhAT4 3_ __
- - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
__.N.
I O
_.I.
f
?
. ~ _, ~ _ - - -... - - -. - - - - - - -. - - - _ - _.
~~--. -
~ ~ ~ - ~
1 M.
9*
Jer=t U
~ - ~
- - ' - - ~ - - -
n -a.,-,. L
, ;_+,.w..
~
n...:. =_..., _._. - _-_ _.a
.w::
=
I: _.,.
4 og to 5[1%[Bi
/
y yQ a '!;;- ~ h.M. i f . e.YvnovstvsI ente h n q_
- p;
) ;,f - * .i. kd,e.vtrice fmdinn krovtAed tw Meh/ewcc. _. i D .. r M. 9 4 d 18 Al3 -? ~j 3 d D,l m. i M 5.._ 3 3 3 i ~ C.Th8.MS*@iuNRL i y bsA d~dum a-ugt ' so.sse. D vyScb ~ ~ .is P Tob.5 hk
- SID, 9
Gli MIy919 Td 10'2 n.k) YodIM)10b i Nn.h9Y \\)O &bd - n 6 M n,h n (Ptuental4391)1% 19'8 mech $ ] 3 l k p VM9 _ %4 L % Fs 4 e6tnoe w n.4 den 3 6.__ e e*. ..i e, ,. i ~' [ umed %.b -[.< ne.:yweb vepir ne.,19 des re e eysIro. ). Edmdr. too b 5 et ? W id usM one b ocahns wnT !< ve, _...d 4 .n
- nie, l.. y 4
e% eei leve.ls rea ei m in leve. N. w..mim
- 4" gl.
g(g..,, DdINTI.3 ) ch.vbr.4< q hwe usbo -9or N { roped.._.] l,j - 1-- hi fmg soWe. - o %wn h .: T - . ggg u.z ;_,;;5 y. i r+
- 5 g
.. 4;, v.. 1 2' kb$hbhkbb b I ! N[h h$ k 1%fo
4 C.AA z. !L I Shelt) i, l j l.- up 1 1 J,, m$.,k'k; k O N kM vi,m.. +e r .f
- .4 l
t M P u g g+.. w ks y.p 4 sy966 bwd3 4..--- I 9.e. -us u.+wgav u 1 CQg Ov't h 3C O A M ikt h cm.,.,,u win a m i-u heep h M coreft,$t CYt4(.Drig WoM dak MI k hij Ceyw g K .-.. =. -.. I s .asse .mi. w., .g,. + e 6 o .W
- 4
- 4
,4+ .si g 1CCED'~2G CR\\ TEM (, Qh"4 - =cepbm enha for %edal o.c.hons wers 4 y (g*W w,&eah At aihna w.Jdb dduEm.J dwmd 1 " 0 b o<gh.dv, %whd aA%
- 4. Wg gc, hes_,&
h . pup,E. 4 L.A d. 4 %,did w c_._ %.a,.,u1Jy. sW4 md wdL. reuA d -bk % L H..Ts dek,,ine u m.a -~ o ma $ Se Cfsh/la n dam M 4,. Chhf14 weS .j, .m 7 _. %%)5 'M. RTdwEDI AL ACD- )N W BH 6 CONW EEb.I ["..t~ H i 4 ENT)REL1 AT.M kPPucAufs 64N Rim 4 b Y / 9.
- we=
.* e .ame. + an. w ,m % i [q,}.* Q _ = _. j h ,.,,,~ 'g 9 ^ ~ ~
- 9. '1
~ . _ ' m._ _ _..'..;u._ n, ~ 'L% _____f,._ _ g s .Q .1 -1 l 1, ..:m, u! '{'[dp.d.; y p. ".7 %*{ aj'-j,7* T.'."
- %%]s*]U 4. '.
- f {* '
- 5 **,*5 I
~ .= Qi., ' ' '~
- A"
% ** f*,+wg' 4* ) 22 I Y $$ N.. . d(bh[ f. ~
3 ji*] 5)iglen ~I 1_, { ' S.Flo A,);s{,.@w! Ovabe.vModyb? soma Qh =
- g. -- -
g ' ::4..
- j. ~.~
h..Bede<ence-M <vv. don howdedin Ec{erenc.e. d b* 'D O'2 55% ~ tvlinob 4 391 4,m9 Mech 4.oh I pen $ eled.Ad-6 ~ 't
- d. '
3 - [ \\a&cdes'or 16.aj.presc69ebNhs Gu 4 Auser-- j 1 un$ Nelu vcu. h.b - Pips frobled we.<<. am(3%l {u nes.dS se.b,,# l 4 sbues Fbue To 2E WTWi4 M.LouJm,La cow .? 3 1 u%. .3 If. NO DE911 MRC E OMtr.sfodel {'o< buried Pfiq 1 occT swa co-c.n.b. eLeer e-cjo'siq Puc.4ldg - A<e. e2 & %d L. cables - Asse va be wo wids whid ud.udei h; on infack ] h.k ytese.ded inwky s}ed[ \\ se G kv3 N9 E 0 q.n. i 64u be seko e e to ed 13 4 - w, maa.% y h b sa. 'l i .. _.. - ~ _ - -.... 9 d. g.4. Pipiq vehroh%n 30G ofeo reg l, :.N... Bd.H,mi. 109. O'4B h -j " ~ ' ' ,g in,4 W.co-ec4 N ao" \\ % (/ ened., sale Iwo _. j ~ J,. wNd=.Mine M 1 g Nth
- Wedkd deb ke..
C#l e ) bI ,P thV g L. yp3 wsT k .c= wm4-bes ved.J~1 D <s / ea.gan
- 28. hs wwd., w. sesedd excessie. l 43_.. _ i
_2 .g. --N L _.._ g. .g. ,. g w.. g, \\. {
- e.. r - n x
- = -... 1qf'g;y - ~ ~~.y Q 9 s ^ {g ....y 2 :--. .r. w..n '8 ____._.___._,,___J, l._ ;,.'. 8, j ,2 f,' ',,.
- a..
l hh?$.'-4.i;y-%_'&_fm%. % &jgq%~Mf_'j{&ml&..,X g[ e Q. :fml;.~m,. -h2,-QQ q,g;]{,;}},. WWQ . _ _ _. _ _y ;, - m .as_.m
4 ' hmt..estha.ur. = e.. -e.e 4eo A " ~ e. t pop an e% we 1
- r..,.,w
, ), e5 = ~. - g~. w %,3 f' f. 0 0. b % S S 4*'s n a ttj b u e. ....doxatit 1L)- ]. ..L'A 5.54 'l6 @ sri. ( Sun, mar 9 l yar-(10/od) ij . c _ _.. _. b)4_19 @, sn' t.9(.i Wtc,keedu.Nnlandu 3 zo.Di e,f-gem t 'o.... -%ky %=d Me t 3 50 m si o ononar1 p 4 R$ M*'*l*neying "* M%Fil % I (N O mi } Q..skt. o inspC Wprs. $vmmanj 4 El 19 J ( 4,1 79_ i.- ,,, M... - p .. J .J.y i ~ p 'l,1b D9 bonSottFixE5.(.Nmmer BLich9 e f0.g(r)ochen-b 4. o e m T.,. - k.'d,m d d.Y W 6 d4J [, q ,L169 3eol.99 m m % i E"E uaa w [ hiiL14-39 _ __ CoE x$dr $dt. bkmmag izhM) l jly3da.. 2' isc ~ d Cow f Summ El4 Be E' l,lb BO q,t M B ..,.... 9,sc a s b rae,,,a ysk, Qy 24.k,<,,h-h%th,,. s Cons %.,, i t(,.SummarL,,slh. 5 a)q.,. n .......__.1,11hb 10 Ma o "~ uunA-9%c q%_ _ _ y s .c ,,..,i op n.: ).[. ... _. 1 '!,t O. mMstsc4 (tresedufet Mr.Iecic).M.bgoed b. l 1;.? .._ MAfLha3s \\Tesb3 j y, 3 (
- N W
p .... ;I 11,k,% m_kk. k.=, %s gvi k%)es_tC nf' krem hS* 3 I, t j g;?.j-
- .,.,.... + 2 il 1,
o .g v.; y ~ ..~.,,...,.;-.
- ~v...
~* ~ - = 4 ' ' V *.; ' .1 i N.' J ' d.s . er' ' ..t.,' .hk?.
- s i- -
.s-V**s $ *s$-^ A = * ~ ' .x. J_... - 1.:: :., L" z' ~'2 = l' '~; ~^ ki% g,q }'., ~ l- /.-3 i-b
aJd Mg( r a :,,1.' Q1], B)kr, $< awn re. L Jk.a 3&ll6la A E 8,.*,,- Th/s) f..,J4 20 f y 4; OPENING STATEMENT %,,.M 'l \\%\\ St4% ep AsLb Reon5en twN 4 The hearing that begins today arises out of an Order issued by the NRC Staff against Consumers Power Company more than 1-1/2 years ago. The reasons for the Order were three-fold: (1) quality assurance deficiencies ' involving the. settlement of the DGB and soil activities at the Midland n site; (2)- a material false statement in the FSAR; and (3) numerous unresolved safety issues' associated with the remedial actions proposed to _ correct the soil deficiencies under and around safety-related structures. This Order, which was issued on December'6,1979, modified the Midland construction permits by prohibiting any further soils construction and i physical implementation of the proposed remedial-actions. Because Consumers Power Company requested a hearing, the Order modifying the construction permits did not go'into effect immediately and also is not in effect today. Consumers, however, has voluntar.ily agreed to comply with the prohibitions in thi Order with" the exception of. a recent decision in which the Staff concurred to proceed with the insta11ation'of some back-up wells. 23 By way ' Jackground information, 'b 5:.7
- will brieny recount the
- significant events that both prec*med a. pompted the issuance of the Order. l9 1 ]s - In July 1978--less than 6 months after the start of construction on the DGB-- H. Consumers observed that there was excessive settlement of the structure. 9 Indeed, the settlement values at that time were approaching the total settle-ment values for the 40-year life of' the building. This excessive settlement was reported orally to the NRC resident inspector at the end of July. l I .~~ .A =
.w ji - T. - 2.- [ Late in September, Consumer filed with the NRC' a written notification pursuant { to10CFR50.55(e) of a significant deficiency in construction--namely, excessive settlement of DGB. An investigation by the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement followed. The conclusions of that investigation were that (1) there was inadequate control and supervision of the plant fill; (2) cor-rective action regarding nonconformances was inadequate; (3) construction > specifications and design bases were not followed; (4) interface between design organization and construction was inadequate; and (5) the FSAR con-tained inconsistent, incorrect and unsupported statements. 'i In January of 1979, Consumers began placing a 20-ft. sand surcharge on put the DGBA This remedial action proceeded without the approval or concur-e rence of the NRC Staff. The surcharge was removed in August when Consumers' experts determined that secondary consolidation had been reached. In the spring of 1979, Consumers took soil borings at the Midland site. The results of these borings showed that the fill material,beneath several additional structures was also inadequate. On the basis of these results, Consumers proposed remedial measures for these other structures. In March of 1979, the NRC Staff issued the initial 10 CFR 50.54(f) request ld for information concerning the adequacy of the plant fill, the quality as-surance program and the detennination and justification of acceptance y I' i l 1 .j a
. criteria for the various remedial measures already taken and proposed to be taken by Consumers. While Consumers did respond to the 50.54(f) requests,
- (
most of their responses were found incomplete and inadequate therefore necessitating the issuance of follow-up requests for information. q Suffice it to say that as of December 6,1979, when the Order was issued, j there were numerous unresolved safety issues associated with the proposed 1 j remedial measures. In general tenns, the Staff was not satisfied that the t g designs for the proposed remedial actions were sufficiently conservative, i As a result of the 50.54(f) requests, follow-up requests and other com-munications between itself and the Staff, Consumers has gradually changed 3 i the proposed " fixes" to take account of the safety concerns raised by the staff. Indeed, within the past 6 months, Consumers has changed the fixes for two of the major structures affected by the inadequate fill. For example, the "fix" originally proposed by Consumers for the Service ~1'j Water Pump Structure involved placing piles and corbels beneath the hovt, rem owabl( ossurawce
- 'l cantilevered portion of the structure. The Staff did not be44 eve that A*
1 piles and corbels would adequately support the cantilevered portion of that structure and therefore in November,1980 posed several interrogatories with respect to the pile and corbel design. In March of this year, in response to interrogatories Consumers informed the Staff that it had decided to drop the pile and corbel design "fix" and now proposed a more conservative "fix," specifically, a continous wall footing which will extend to the glacial till. In fact, as recently as May of this year,
't Consumers abandoned the originally proposed fix for the Auxiliary Building q Electrical Penetration areas which was to place caissons under the area y G and instead has decided to proceed with a more conservatively designed "fix" k which involves removing' the bad fill and replacing it with a mass of concrete. a l:j. The NRC Staff has welcomed these changes since they address the Staff's original $' A1 concerns.. The staff is currently in the process of either waiting for more
- . 4k specific infonnation on certain " fixes" or reviewing for approval information H
j already received on other " fixes." ]
- j Ordinarily, in an enforcement proceeding such as this, the Staff would pro-I ceed first with its presentation of testimony on the basis for the Order.
However, because the Staff and Consumers are currently in the process of negotiating. stipulations and because a proposed stipulation already has been filed on QA, the Staff has decided to postpone presentation of its case in support of the Order and instead to proceed with its testimony on QA and management attitude in response to Intervenor Barbara Stamiris' Contentions M 1, 2 and 3. ~ $q-In addition to addressing certain of Mrs. Stamiris' contentions in the fol-1 lowing 2 weeks of hearing, Consumers and the Staff will seek a ruling from the Licensing Board on the proposed quality assurance stipulation and the Staff will present testimony in support of the last paragraph of the stipulation. This stipulation which was filed by Consumers and the Staff on June 8 consists of 3 paragraphs. The first 2 paragraphs relate to the enforcement aspect of the case, that is, in paragraph 1 Consumers admits that prior to December 1979 e,+-.*-.we--e-_-e--- e, y . %c _e-se e y-wm-= m - -h--== -<m-os=^ %,%u4.. M-- e ti
c g.. l ~ .e iI. -5. l, there were certain enumerated QA deficiencies associated with soil con-Li ) ~ s$ruction activities at the Midland site and then in paragraph 2 Consumers agrees not to contest the Staff's conclusion that these enumerated QA j deficiencies constituted a breakdown in QA and an adequate basis for issuance ii of. the' December 6 Order. Because Consumers has submitted to the juris-y j diction of the' Licensing Board with respect to the QA breakdown, it is not necessary for the parties to present testimony in support of that issue. p l Paragraph 3 of the proposed stipulation, however, is a different matter. That paragraph addresses the present QA situation at Midland and specifi-p cally stipulates that NRC has reasonable assurance that QA and QC pro-grams will be appropriately implemented with respect to future soils i l i construction activi, ties. Because that paragraph involves a health and safety finding Which the Board cannot delegate to the Staff but rather must independently make, Mr. Keppler - the Director of Region 3 - will
- )
i present testimony which addresses the " reasonable assurance" conclusion L in paragraph 3 of the stipulation. j Paragraph 3 also stipulates that the QA program satisfies all requisite i NRC criteria. This statement was included at the urging of Consumers. l It must be noted, however, that the docketed QA program is not at issue in this proceeding. The Staff has never alleged that the QA program was inadequate; the implementation of the program is what the Staff has found deficient. Nevertheless Mr. Gilray - a QA engineer - will appear with I-Mr. Keppler to provide testimony in support of paragraph 3. I- ~ Y_r-_:__m_m. .-:-1_n n-~,._..--_._.__._____.--.___.-_-
u.
- t.:,'
l, 11
- If:the proposed stipulation is accepted, the Staff maintains.that it has v
) satisfied its burden of going forward with evidence " sufficient to require o reasonable minds to inquire further." 1 J.- With respect to Mrs. Stamiris' contentions the Staff plans on introducing testimony on the following: d 'l j (1) In general terms Contention 1 alleges Consumers' less than complete .) and candid dedication to providing information to the NRC. The contention specifies examples in support of its thesis. Staff witnesses will address all of Contention 1, with the exception of 1(d). That includes the 6 supplemental examples that Mrs. Stamiris raised in an April 20, 1981 pleading. .j (2) Parts of Contention 2 will also be addressed. Contention 2 i alleges that Consumers' time and financial pressures have adversely affected resolution of the soil settlement problem. Staff witnesses will address only 2(a), (c) and (d) during this portion i i of the hearing. 4 (3) Contention 3 alleges failure to implement Consumers' QA program. That contention will be addressed in full by a Staff witness. The balance of Mrs. Stamiris' contentions and Mrs. Sinclair and Mr. Marshall's OL contention will be addressed at a later session I of this proceeding.
_h t m m 1-w. w &b \\$$%s 33 d I. Service Water Pumo Structure Hearing e i .. Not yet scheduled for underpinning design.. The' seismic model' session is scheduled for 12/14/81 and SEB .j testimony was filed 12/1/81 based upon review of CPCo's 5 if 9/30/81 letter describing dynamic model. Neither the CPCo testimony. nor the staff testimony have addressed ~ the input-(soil' spring constants) into the. seismic model and part of a later hearing session may be used.. Staff review is by COE/Vicksburg. ,j= n Testimony 'j Due two weeks prior to start of hearing (Holidays and years-end annual leave wipe out last two weeks of December). Submittals Review Completion Date Branch / Resource
- 1. August-26, 1981 Letter, TBD*
HGEB " Technical Report on Under-TBD COE .i-pinning the SWPS (also dis-TBD SEB 1 cussed _at 9/17/81 meeting) TBD NSWC
- 2. November 6 -1981 Letter, TBD HGEB
" Responses to NRC Requests TBD COE for Additional Information I Proposed Underpinning on i
- 3. November 6,1981 Letter, TBD HGEB
-i " Test Results, SWPS, Soil TBD COE j Boring and Testing Program" j
- 4. Sept. 30, 1981 Letter TBD SEB (Encl.1), "SWPS Seismic TBD COE (Vicksburg)
Model Construction Start i Construct access shaft 4/15/82 Excavate and install piers 5/05/82 1 Future bebelttals Needed { Struct. Static Model and Analysis (finite element) Crack Analysis Soil Spring inputs for seismic model(M5Orm4d Mt#9 kMg i i l
- TBD = to be determined
- ~.., m.: a .x. - w=w. ~ 4 C
- j II. Auxilary Bullding
[k Hearing i Underpinning design session held 12/1-4/81.- Identified several~ licensing conditions and followup needed.
- }
-.o Seismic models session scheduled' for 12/14-18/81 and testimony was filed 12/1/81. ,_l . Soil spring constants input to the model are not addres' sed 1.. in present testimony. A.iater session may be used for this part. Testimony Due two weeks prior to hearing start. Holidays and years-end + - . leave to be considered in immediate planning. Li Submittals-Review Completion Branch .i
- 1. St-pt. 30,1981 Letter (Encl.2),
12/1/81 (testimony) SEB l " Auxiliary Building Seismic Model" 12/18/81(E)(soil springs) COE h
- 2. Oct. 26 report and Nov. 24, 1981 Pt I: ll/23/81(C)
HGEB/COE Letters, " Parts 1 & 2, Woodward-Clyde Pt II: TBD HGEB/C0E Report on Test Results. Soil Boring and Testing Program" - 3. Nov.16,.1981 Letter, " Response 1/30/81 - 5/1/82 HGEB/COE 1,' to NRC Questions (from Oct. 30, 1981 (license conditions) SE8 Conf. call)" I
- 4. 3kc. 3 t9%l Conshruction Start Installation (not activation) of Approved 11/24/81 access shaft and freezewall Subsequent activities (See license conditions from staff testimony -
Table A.20) Future Submittals N; Responses to license conditions (Table A.20) I' iI (E) = estimated i e if- .1 1 _,____gn,_.,_.,,,, _ wwwem ---,4~e,-- _ _ mm
(- I .t ~! 3- 'I III. Borated Water Storage Tank Foundations 1 .1 Hearing Remedial action session not yet scheduled. Seismic model session scheduled for 12/14-18/81 and 1 SEB testimony filed 12/1/81. j Applicants testimony (received 12/7/81) includes dynamic model for BWST not previously submitted for NRC review. ~ Testimony Due two weeks prior to hearing start Submittals Review Completion Date Branch
- 1. Nov.13,1981 Letter, " Design TBD Report for BWST Foundation SEB TBD Analysis" HGEB/COE w
i
- 2. Nov.10,1981 Letter, " Test TBD Reports, BWST, Soil Boring a HGEB/COE Testing Program." Also enclosure on settlement vs. log of time S. ha.4 Abl Dn.ma WJdybwT 3
Construction Start Surcharge BWST valve pits Staff approved 9/25/81. Now in place. 't l Reset tank TBD Begin construction of TBD $0archt dt1 adjacent ring found, j e f ., 4 k
- I i
t 'i 1 4 a ,,,,.__,_.._u..%--e*----
- -D***
P "
y n _. w __ il~. a 3-t -4_ t-j IV. - Diesel Generator _Buildina ll Hearing j Session on adequacy of surcharging not yet scheduled (covered in part during Aug. 4-13 session on intervenor Stamiris contentions).
- Session on seismic model not yet rescheduled. Originally scheduled for 12/14/81. Applicant and staff agreed to defer.
7 - Testimony Due two weeks prior to hearing start. Submittals Review Completion Date Branch 1.' July 27, 1981 Letter, TBD HGEB/COE " Update of Settlement Readings i and Piezometer Data" ~1
- 2. Oct. 21, 1981-Letter, TBD HGEB/COE "CPCo Response to NRC Questions TBD SEB (from May 5,1981 Meeting) with 8 Enclosures"
- 3. Oct. 2,1981 Letter, "D68 -
TBD SEB/NSWC Concrete Crack Analysis Study" 'TBD HGEB/COE I
- 4. Boring Test Results Mid-November,1981 (c)
HGEB/COE (Reports dated 7/31/81 & _j 8/17/81)
- 5. Amendment 97 - Revision 12 to TBD HGEB/COE 50.54(f) Responses on Plant Fill -
Updated Piezometer and Settlement Plots. Submitted 10/26/81 and 11/3/81 Construction Start ,i i The surcharge program is completed. No further construction j remedial activity is pending staff approval. !I i 'I
- ~
f, =- .. =. .= ~ 5-V.-. Linderground Pipes and Utilities Hearings i ff Not yet scheduled g. Testimony j-Two weeks prior to hearing start Submi ttal s Branch i None (other than meeting presentations and earlier MEB/ETEC fl profile results and stress calculations) .q '.I Construction Start
- t -
1 .] To be determined ] . l- - l .:i ? .I + 1 1 3 .e a e e the 9 t D. 6 wO'NT IUN #*'Y"'DTk. IM II'd'MN'N-*M M M T ^
- =
=. .. = n. g ').^ .'l - -{ 6-N{ ' VI. Permanent Dewatering .k. ' -- Installation approved by NRC. It is not known whether any further ,1 separate hearing session for this subject is intended by the Board. h. Future Submittals Branch 3 ij Results of drawdown and watertable HGEB Ji recovery tests (recharge tests) m 4 h '.)i
- =
's ~ I t i i a 1 } b t, h a g 2 .e f e ) 4 -1 ,e e l'. s q. ~1 ,.1 .f 'q y 1 ..1
- ~k 2.
.,o i -~
a _.:.w...-.-.-. W m" - a -- u e m 'X=a w" * "a - ~ - - ~ .L I o -t ) Table A.20 l 1 I Requested Starting i ~ Date of Construction Date Informatinn Construction Milestone. Available for Staff Review Milestone l 5 [- F 1. Install Vertical Access Shaft to llo submittal required 12/29/81 . {. 1 ~' El. 609 and Complete Freeza Wall U Installation. I l Proposed Special License Condition: lione ( j i i 2. Activate Freezing of Soll along 12/15/01 2/1/82 i . Freeze llall Alignment l t Proposed Special License Conditions: 2a. Provide documentation demonstrating the Freeze llall, when activiated, will not adversely. r t. i t aficct selsmic Category I structures, conduits and pipes by causing ground heave or t resettlement upon unfreezing. { 2b. Provide a plan, with established criteria and basis, for field monitoring of the effects 1 of the Freeze Wall. The required plan will include a cornaitment to monitor both vertical and lateral movements at a minimum of four locations where safety related stractures and j utilities could potentially bo affected. T4is f q, /, f, 4e foeov//c / 47 ///s/#a. I i / 1 -i, 2c. 3e~l IF Provide responses for questions 4 entified in Attachment 21 wi. ic.r 'Naduna"91=Mr;=3h-td 5, ^L anu 30. j i 2d. Provide responses for review conce:ns identified in answers to questions 14 and 17 of this testimony. i r .] f [g I f p, g._._
.. 2 a.a m. = c m.w.:c._r r r;w y y. . _ a cc... m _. - u.. _.... g& z r-x.* [- ). Requested Starting Date Infonnation Date of Construction ( ;! Construction Milestone Available_for Staff Review Milestone E 3. Extend Vertical Access Shaf t below 1/15/82 2/15/02 L El. 609 and begin to remove soll d foundation support from beneath \\ Feedwater Isolation Valve Pit. l' i y f Proposed Spectal License Conditionst Provide design analysis for temporarily supporting the Feedwater Isolation Valve Pits (FIVP) ' Ja. ,~ * 'on beams extending from the Cuttress Access Shaf t to the Turbine Guilding. Tite design will identify actual loads and djsplacements and demonstrate the adequacy and safety' of the 4 i ' temporary support system. \\ i l 3b. Provide an acceptable monitoring program with criteria for avoiding adverse impact on FIVP. t sc. Prwi/e rego ses to g ueshe ns 5,8,16 /I,1z,1.3, M, ifa, 27 lnd z <j ;)c n to'foU iL 4fft e 4 *.e, t' 21 ( ) 4. Begin drift excavation beneatit.the, 1/15/82 2/15/8'2 Turbine Building. I-Proposed Special License cdnditions: - 4a. Provide design analysis (including supporting calculations, drawings and specifications) -f'!' which evaluates the anticipated unde mining and temporary construction loading on the Turbine Du11 ding at this stage. The analysis will be required to demonstrate an l ) l !' acceptable margin of safety for the Turbine Building to safely carry the imposed l il temporary construction loads so as to avoid adverse impact on the adjacent Auxiliary Building. p [- (b. Provide an acceptable monitoring program for affected Category I structures, conduits and I I pipes with criteria and basis for this construction stage. Criteria basis should describe how movements to be measured are related to code allowable stresses and allowable strains. I eI 4c. Provide documentatfois demonstrating the adequacy of the final pennanent support system l3-along the north side of the Turbine Dullding in safely providing long-term support for l, , t,he Turbine Dullding without adversely impacting the Auxiliary Duilding.- i / 4,, is, Provide responses lfo'r questions 9,325 and 30 which are identified in Attachment 21. ~ .t 4d. t t l , r'- e .- ( *, ); G )t L ;i '.:.. -- '* E
_. ~ r u _..: n _.:_ cn.& L e w - ,ca -3. Requested Starting t ' Date Infonnation Date of Construction Construction Milestone Available for Staff Review Milestone .l g I^ 5. Dcgin removal of soil foundation 2/1/02 4/1/82 [~ t-support from beneath Auxillary Dullding. ~ l l. ' Proposed Special License Condit1ons: \\- ~ ~ f* Sa. Providedesignanalysis(includingsupportingcalculations,drawingsandspecifications) i which evaluates the temporary support system for the Auxiliary llu11 ding at appropriate i i '. sequential stages of excavation and jacking. The design analysis will be required to demonstrate acceptable margins of safety at the various stages of temporary construction, j; j l; 5b. Provide an acceptable monitoring program with, criteria and basis for temporary conditions I of loading at this stage of construction. Q7 /2 19,20,Zl,tl L-Provide, responses far,..questi,ons la,Aand 28 which are identified in Attachment 21. [, 23 5c. g s 5d. Provide design analysis (including supporting calculations, drawings and spec'fications). i i demonstrating the adequacy of the installed temporary post-tensioning system. j 5e. Provide an engineering evaluation of all cracks (existing and new) and propose a plan'. ' l l1 f i for the detailed evaluation of through cracks. 1 l'i, 6. Degin construction of pennanent 5/17/02 11/1/82 i I underpinning wall. Proposed Special License Conditions: i Ga. Provide design analysis (including supporting calculations, drawings and specifications) l -l which evaluates the pennanent underpinning structure. The design analysis will be I required to address all load combinations.lucluding stability under scismic loading, i b1 ll I r 6b. Provide results of the evaluation of through cracks. g 1 i i i,' 6c. Provide an acceptable monitoring program with criteria and basis for long-term plant, operation condition. 6J. fy,y* sele y.cgjeen es fo e, y ve sf[e nt l e nl 2 w N*k 't 4 19eii N \\ @4*b M M* i l 1 s .~ ; _s, _ ,l
- ' ~ ' ' '
c c
~ m l 3 .-s,.- c1 ....i i P.ECORD OF TELEPHC::E CC::VERSATIC:!S d Cate: Oct ber 30, 1981 Project: Midland 50-330 6 Recorded by: Joseon D. Kane il Talked Uith: CPCo Eechtel
- RC CCE
'l -j D. Sudzik A. Ecos R. La.ds an H. Singh G. Keeley N. 5.ar. berg F. Rinaldi C. Hood J. Kar.e .j Route To: For infor.ation G. Lear j L. Heller O. Hood ~ H. Faton F. Rinaldi R. Lands..an, I&E, Region III T H. Singh, COE, Chicago 1 J. rane Main Subject of Call: Re.tedial Underpinning of Auxiliary Building and Feedwater Isolation Valve Pits i Items Discussed:
- 1. to CPCo September 30, 1981 submittal from J. W. Cook to H. R. Denton entitled " Technical Report en Underpinning the Auxiliary Building and Feedwater Isolation Valve Pits". During the October 30, 4
1981 conference call CPCo was requested to respond to the fnlicwing questions which had been developed in the COE/ilRC review of Enclosure 3 relative to geotechnical engineering aspects in underpinning the Auxiliary Building. ~ Q.1. (Pg. 2, Sect. 4, 2nd Para.) Please define " design Jacking force," how established and the duration that it will be heid? Q.2. (Pg.'2. Sect. 4, 3rd Para.) Discuss and provide detail cf dowel connection. (Diameter, how distributed along wall, length of embedment,etc). Q. 3. - (Pg. 3. Sect. 5.1, last para) The agreed upon acceptance criteria for soil particle monitoring during dewatering requires 0.005 m and not 0.05 m. Correction by CPCo required. .s 8111240404 811120 t PDR ADOCK 05000329 l T .] PDR J
- J
';;.___-~ - - - - = - - - - -. ~'
- _,. --,- - - y ;1
1 o u Jc t Q.4. (Pg. 3, Sect. 5.1, Para. b) Installing the fro:en cutoff mmbrane' q will cause expansion and possibly increase the soil voids. When ~ ultimately unfrozen, what is the effect (e.g., further settlement). j on safety related structures, conduits and piping. Pr: vide discussion on the basic system of the frozsn membrane [ size and spacing of holes a d, - to be ' drilled, method for paa,cing brine into fcundation layers, range of temperatures that are critical to wall stability which are to be monit: red, dec:missi:r.ing (e.g., grouting, etc)]. .l Q.5. (Pg. 2. Sect. 5.2) Clarify the proced' re to be used in ;est tensioning the Electrical Penetratica Area. Where will the bu:yancy force be .j transmitted to the foundation and in what mar.ner? Q.6. (Pg. a, Sect. 5.6, 2nd Para.) Pleese explain the.saning of " failure d $sarir.g capacity factors" and the basis for "the nine times the shear j strength for the cene"? Q.7. (Pg. 4, Sect. 5.b, 4th Para.) 'Jcw will the equivalent scil modulus 4 he determined? What is the depth that the measured set: lament will y be distributed over and what is the area to be used in de ermining ? the stress? Q.8. (Pg. 4, Sect. 6) Presently, this paragraph implies that crack 4 monitoring will not be performed on the existing structure. Please correct. Before remedial underpinning begins an accurate and up-to-date record of cracks should be developed for thesa safety related structures which could potentially be affected by the unt.erpinning operations. This backgrcund record should be verified by I&E inspection and could serve as the basis for evaluating any changes in cracks due to underpinning operations, j Q.9. (Pg. 5, Sect 6.1.1 and 6.1.2) When will the acceptance c.-iteria for ] the differential and absolute settlement be provided to the tiRC7 I Q.10. (Pg. 5, Sect. 6.2) Provide the basis for establishing the crack width - of 0.03 inch. Appendix D should also address crack monitoring j requirsents during underpinning (frequency of reading, format for presenting observations, action levels etc). ]! Q.ll. (Pg. 6, Sect. 7.2.1, last Para.) Provide discussion why the drained shear strength is not required to be considered in analyzing for adequate bearing capacity. Also in the last paragraph in Section i 7.2.1, Pg. 7 indicate the basis for the 2 days and what wuld be required if the settlement rate does not reach a straight line trend in 2 days. ~' Q.12. (Pg. 7 Sect. 7.2.2) Where are the WCC controlled rebound-reload cycle soil test results? What is the corresponding stress level with a secant modulus of elasticity equal to 3500 KSF? j i ,. ~.. p. t t
- t..
1 w _s h 2.. r 3 ~ w a { j .Q.13..(Fg. 8, Sec: 7.2.3,1st Para. ) The estimates of sett'e.er.t using i the referenced NAVFAC DM-7 do not include secondary c:nsolidation. l What seccndary consolidation would be indicated if the c:..solidatio,n ~ test results using the appropriate 1:ad increment were us.ed? C:mpare this estimate with values for per-.anent all ccnditions y "after, jacking, long ter:n". Please prcvide basis for the three 1 estimated settlement valves for " Load transfer points for temporary 4 1 cad to reactor footing" at the bott:m of pg. E and discuss any ] effects of this settlement on the reactor and pipe c:r...ections. a Q.14. (Fg A-1, Sect.1, 2nd Far.) Please indicate h:w the soil spring constants were established for long tara 1 cads. 7 Q.15. (Fg C-2, last Par. and Fg. C-6, Par. 3) What are the ;retective f c:nstruction measures planned for the Turbir.e Building and Sut:ress ? . Access Shafts and when will they be placed? Please pr: vide discussion a on the sequence of operations to complete the drift beneath the f Turbine Building and show sectional views of this work with respect y to the Turbine 5uilding foundations and affected piping and conduits. Q.16. (?g C-2, Par. A.1.a) Please explain what is meant by mini.izing the amount of concrete to be rec:ved. e Q.17. (Pg. C-3, Par. A.1.c. and A.1.d) What is the magnitude of the load Ll for testing the tamparary support pier and hcw was it established i and how will it be applied? Is the EFA foundation slab capable of 1 supporting this load at this time? n }j Q.18. (Pg. C-4, Sect. A.l.f.,1st complete para. ) Provide discussion on monitoring of the control tower behavior at this time. What criteria will be used to decide if preload should be stopped and support capacity should be added to the control tower? Q.19. (Pg. C-4, Sect. A.2.) What are the reasons why the three temporary d supports under the EPA should not be comoleted before the pennanent support at the control tower is initiated? Q.20. (Pg. C-4, Sect. A.3.a) Questions are raised as to whether the EPA "t structure can withstand the overhang condition which results if the initial temocrary supports is assumed to fail. What is the basis and need for this extreme assumption? Is the E?A structure capable of ,.. withstanding this loading condition? Q.21.-(Pg.C-4,SectA.3.b'andA.3.c) The distinction between 3.b and 3.c is unclear. What is the magnitude of the load for testing and how established? Is there'a problem with the E?A foundation slab providing a sufficient reaction load? Q.22. (Pg. C-5. Sect.14 and 15) It appears the operations described in these item.s are intended 'only for the wings and not the control i r tower. How is the load test and load transfer for the control tower to be completed. For the long tenn load
- test on the wings, what is the load magnitude and how was it' established? What is the final f
'.5 7 3,. 9q.:.. h -;.Ny, .? 1 W; ' ._ t
- r-__,.
_ru.. +. ._m_
- . =
+ e..? _z_ sequence of oparations in transferring the structure lead to the pe manent underpinning. tj i Q.23. (Pe.. D-1, Sect 1.0, 2nd Par) Describe the procedure that relates i allcwable stresses and all:,.able strains with structure =cvstents that are being monitored. w j Q.24. (Pg D-2, Sect.1, 3rd Far.) Please clarify the distin: tion between the first and second layer systsms fcr detectir.g struct'. e. cvitant. i, i Q.25. (Pg 0-2, Sect.1, 4th, 5th, and 7th Para.) Pisase pr: vide elevaticas i and sectional views with typical details for the deep seated banch mark and the instrumentation for conitoring relative horizontal c:ve.T.ent and absolute horizontal scve ent. l h Q.25. (Pg. D.3, Sect. 2, 2nd Par.) Please clarify the ax?la,etion why the hydraulic pressure data cannot be used to ceasure Icad. i.i] Q.27. (Pg. D-3, Sect. 2, 3rd Par.) Provide sectional view of set up for 9 measuring difference in relative pcsition. Mcw does this procedure 9 'l address the possibility of both the underpinr.ing elenant and structure settling? Provide the basis for maintaining the jack / hydraulic i system for 1 hcur and for establishing the 0.01 inch. cve.ent. Q.28. (Pg. D-4, Sect. 2, 4th Para.) When will the modeling and critical structural stresses and strains be detamined and furnished to the
- iRC?
Q.29. (Pg 0-5, Sect. 2, 2nd and 3rd Para.) Provide sketch'and locations j. with typical details of instrumentation for measuring concrete stress, tell ~ tale devices and predetermined points for monitoring vertical movement. Q.30. - (Pgs. D-5 and D-6 Sect. 3, Par. 3A.1, 3A.2, 3A.3) For the various types of monitoring described in these paragraphs provide an example of the fonns to be used for plotting the recorded data.
- 4 hat are J.
the predetennined levels of movements which would recuire adjustments [, i and/or action by the onsite geotechnical engineer. Identify any specific instrumentation which would be continued to be read during ) plant operation and which eventually will be addressed by a Technical Specification.
- 2. ' Cdnsumers was notified that the above ouestions do not contain the COE/flRC i
review comments on the laboratory test results for foundation soils beneath { the Auxiliary Building. The COE/HRC cements on the test results will be furnished at a later date following CPCo submittal of the Part II lab test report which is expected to be submitted to the flRC the week of flovember 2,1981. ( 3. Consumers indicated the questions asked in the conference call of October 30. 1981 would be addressed as far as possible in the upcoming meeting with NRC in Bethesda on flovember 4,1981. i d t w 4 .O v.~ '. -... ~.. , *,..' s t ', ' -,. [,- -.3. h .}}