ML20093C374

Responds to 830523 & 0810 Requests for Assistance in Reviewing Util Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law on Remedial Soils Issues.Agrees W/Findings.Recommends Paragraph Re Occurence of Liquefaction Be Revised

ML20093C374
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	09/14/1983
From:	Ballard R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Paton W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
Shared Package
ML19258A087	List: IR 05000329/1978020 IR 05000329/1981012 IR 05000329/1982007 IR 05000329/1982009 IR 05000329/1982014 ML19258A086 ML19351C947 ML20093B251 ML20093B495 ML20093B616 ML20093B708 ML20093B747 ML20093B900 ML20093B940 ML20093C001 ML20093C006 ML20093C017 ML20093C025 ML20093C030 ML20093C035 ML20093C068 ML20093C073 ML20093C079 ML20093C082 ML20093C101 ML20093C104 ML20093C108 ML20093C116 ML20093C174 ML20093C189 ML20093C196 ML20093C226 ML20093C231 ML20093C262 ML20093C318 ML20093C324 ML20093C347 ML20093C354 ML20093C374 ML20093C377 ML20093C390 ML20093C394 ML20093C398 ML20093C405 ML20093C440 ML20093C444 ML20093C649 ML20093M884 ML20093M994 ML20093N005 ... further results
References
CON-BX17-037, CON-BX17-37, FOIA-84-96 NUDOCS 8309270366
Download: ML20093C374 (2)

Text

.

g.

'=

m

~

' QI

$,

• L

~

'[

id_

L iv rt r m.stys g-Ut.% E *. H : F U t tc..L;Y :'O*. '.ilr'..

N

v. '.. -, ;, % 1 e c. mss m:

i SEr 14.1983 4..

Docket Nos. 50-329 and 50-330.

HEMORANDUM FOR: William D. ~ Paton, Attorney Office of the Executive Legal Director FROM:

1 Ronald L. Ballard, Chief s

Environmental &~ Hydrologic Engineering Branch Division of Engineering

SUBJECT:

PREPARATION OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WITH RESPECT TO THE t1IDLAND HEARINGS a

'- Plant Name: Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 Licensing Stage: OL Requested.Compi.etion Date: September 23,1983 3

In notes dated May 23, 1983.and August 10, 1983 which you addressed to the Midland PM, Darl Hood (with copies sent' to the Midland reviewers), you requested assistance in reviewing Consumer Power Company's " Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on' Remedial Soils Issues".

c Although we performed a cursory review'of the entire findings, our review emphasis was on the paragraphs related to our_ SER and SSER input and to the.

testimony presented at the hearings.

I

~

following:

We are in full agreement with the applicant's findings except for the The last sentence of paragraph 456 states, "Therefore, there is reasonable assurance that the public health and safety will not be endangered by the occurrence of liquefaction at the Midland 1

site." We don't think.this is a correct statement. The

'~

occurrence of. liquefaction could be 'a problem, that is the reason for the permanent dewatering system.

We would recomend p

that the sentence be revised to read as follows:

"Therefore,

~

there is reasonable assurance that liquefaction will not occur and thus,'that the public health and safety will not be endangered."

J

..a.MA- + -..~..-.-

William D. Paton SEP 141983 l

He also note that contrary to what footnote no. 565 states, figure 2.11 of SSER #2 does not show the location of the circulating water lines.

This review was perfonned by R. Gonzales who can be reached on extension 28018.

t.4, ira;.: _:. py ib.!cid L Ballani Ronald L. Ballard, Chief Environmental & Hydrologic Engineering Branch Division of Engineering cc:

R. Vollmer W. Johnston D. Hood N. Wright M. Wilcove G. Lear M. Fliegel L. Heller J. Kane R. Gonzales

-I t

DISTRIBUTION:

Dockets EHEB Rdg RLBallard/ FILE s

~

D

"'c5 > DE;EliES.h.. 0E;NEl.T.... pE: kf.

' ua= > BGoon1p;m.. tifl ip99)...

.. Bl.pa,1, p d,,

J

^"> P/) 3/03......9/f)/8.3....

.. 9////.83..................

. gRC FORM 318 (10-80l NRCM O240

... O FFir'I A l _ R FCO R D_ CO PY_.

__.