ML20094K292
| ML20094K292 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 03/04/1980 |
| From: | Kane J NRC |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19258A087 | List:
|
| References | |
| CON-BX16-070, CON-BX16-70, FOIA-84-96 NUDOCS 8408150012 | |
| Download: ML20094K292 (8) | |
Text
Q gythwiht{GMido cum 0M5
/
6G 2'.03D OF TELE?!iONE C05V7.Ru id khloud Q4(tQ E W..,
PaoJ CT:
' ;.r:
b, g,ygf3 r.
g l.-
- t..
- s..- d.D BY :
. Qne.
CLIG ":
(' O.R.h e. h c.iI. ). s h.
. h y,
OF f313.ED WITH:
.L Zl, -til9 ROUTE TO:
fNFO.0% TION AC fION t.
.:.$W
.. S W$.n.
' MIN SUBJECT OF CALL: [g.gyd{q h hnn k o d a c o".5
. d d, t bC.;
Lh DE YevieW_
. k on bklantk NSC.uss t reais Discussed: we.c.eny.,sReMic), vi> rn (L.3s.ke;c.,;,1ehe3 Salasc4iwa t"
.!d;td J,1_b4 lhlbdepe.dEth snpt: Mr.:og,.eew3ds44he 3
j$%
I hbild%hl Am..l.lg,pl A.s M p..! LIM %hJ4,,3.g@da,ev.,e 3
0 m o q ilo9,, b d s.th. 4 h y m.M ks.._.
i n n,,,..o..a
,I gi;'['Tl%j') Agre),..>...u.a.lb{!wqd>Lon pshtqhlh!<Jr.3_kkilmi b PM i
z t.auv.-,id ditobuhnblub 1the bb&;.mi! kp.1, cat j
kd{iayJ.da..{ech.enlikSamcktfcf..p.h1..:..,j)y< hen.
D is \\4iethqd.n..J13e.pd 4 h.!du upt ap.,ut4. ilk m.L lts &,p u. n n w ul L w. M k < M. h. u.h u R k i3.0 % ) ihe. h. h.s h
' g b _.
Rph d.& %.hd. wc >>c Jd1n.%r.noa.c<3.Jiucg.zuht* sit 1, g h n.p.t J4,J,w a 4 e d y m A lb B N d m iea M eo.
M.'m*w r,.S h k,h p %. g & h.D., p q c,%e +.a &
.d xumkLgie b &cus k %S :dbed yrdA,n.d.h phb.
W G.di nuen% % o mul-\\9,q:,,c.M.ba,ai h.i.d,I., h. b A.,h.
3
(
Ncbu.
ela,.n 4-succmbl1 tm.kn3 N.bGBs k..,<..tpdA,$
Ac 2,. d mg.t y,qtm.h u,3<p t.u ecomi b s-b,,,,t i,, w,i k.,
H,t.<3 g g
.sb,,w - dadhv c,~.a buim w.. a t % ~ ~ f n y lu M,m d u n h,.nc 6 1,,ch A Id L.a.t u.
, m...
.w * -
,,n,wnp,,
k i aheo.
-Subtn*,L \\ le"d I
MDT..
b O'l NK ygvu,s sw.ycevidir,9 2(t s,,t c, i.y 0400150012 040710 PDR FOIA RICE 04-96 PDR
E tc.'d 2lSie(TM3 M(e.ktmmgy3 kuOdiaws vog COE. Myo,
),d,,c,,t fr% thaCwrie,9 pstTion docuvvien 5
"'4 D*'cy *
^
so pu Dewatering h
1.
Dewatering the uand fersu s in fill?
2.
Sand lunsen (fines).3mqut-)siv can thusu he munitored?
3.
What kind of backup system in there for the perrian. cot dvsu tu ri ng syntes?
4.
Also if there is a failure or shut-down of the systeu. could feSc g
mvet fines by rc[teeting?
5.
Are the dewatering wellu l'ully.[**ksk,4 7
6.
What tyFe of scrucos are the ec.
- L 4ks. Im Ia 35* 5 7
sL 7.
In the, fig, 44 km potential in the mand lenses in the till areau?
8.
Other twans of groundwater contrott ge t.u t for u te. criteria for f\\
nelectinn of dewatvring nethods 7 9
Test methada to inaure scree: Pare clear, and not encrasted v/ulnerals ove r t ime.
10.
Cravel pack gradation fr r vacts well?
Ga ndation ahnuld vary and/or t.,
careiolly a,ulcetedfe,- e..k leyce.
11.
I'unp tests to detamine purnptnt, rates required?
12.
Well opactnn propouwd and criterial for selection?
l.).
What Aliout the emergency haat sink? Will it be pucted down by the 1.p :.'
CO E, 4 3 ' ' '
g.< *,t <c,s ? o idenb h h do%me"7 V .' I 3" E*'
4
\\w h,5 Eqwml e,s.oi 3'e tos k sF( !) c' I' 'It a : M a"M ' i' ; * ' Ia D CI-
6 ' ^ ' )
3 G.,ai.. t ep e k o.45 4
- uur
- c o a
e.
7 1.
Length of prop 9 sed pilotand diano>ter.
7 8.
M.>nitoring plans for f attico acttleraints.
9.
Carrection vf cancks e(he rispair of f ounda t ion.
- 10. Literal support for cantilevered sectlon.
- 11. Overall building stability.
- 12. Seepage fO around the building.
I ).
nif fereurtal 4+c ttcowoc prohlome.
i
- 14. Want a copy of clie retaining well design.
!b Vihrtit ion of enefilise ry les pumphouse(hism
' 9 b '44.es k I* bijn l
- 16. Settivuunt ef fects ain piping.
l
- 17. Circulating mter in-takn structure a Category I structure?
l Crnektng of Strii$ce - to be repaired ut ter remedial actioni completed.
mnnitoring of cracks <.
Riectrica) Ouet n. ink s i
1.
ConnectIonn a huitdings
'3
?
l 2.
facarton of stuct banks Corpn to be concerned wi th.
3.
Why did duct banks consporattly support batiding?
j 4.
Ara tliese ur can these all be munitoried?
(,
]
,. wa r ar ine, ays t en.
14.
Dinesten overal l op.ia ted dewa terlog plativ, 15.
Selumic ef feet on down tering nyn tom - f(** <*.I.
wells. 109 c h #A Ja.-
pi pe, etc.
16.
CompAri 4on of fl0W rate % (CatR the CuG110$ pun,l under normM1 CondlCInn e
and earth tp kt conditions pumping ratesus. M;, eglas.
9 17.
What max. T. water content in wand layers is allowable w/o having 11guttaccion potential? How do we know we're attaining those lovels?
Settjesent of,,D.C. Bu{ld g 1.
Were is this bu11 ding on the tice.nettlemnt curve?
2.
h e i n t he han j a for the i 1/2" of add'i set tlerant predictInn? (1/2 carthqaske, 1/4 40-yedt f4*I.'C load, acid 1/4" deva torf ng).
3.
Tubs k,44.h settlement that bldg. is in secondary con sullda tiois pla s s.
4 Hsva addittunal bort nign heen taken to dem%trate that the efficlency I
or ef fectivoun of zurcharp,t ng bcation of these and f uture burisigw planned.
t i.
Monitoring for future settlemeitte of the in 11 ding.
6.
Alteritative metliods for currective measurne (underpioning).
i 7.
Seismic ef fects of fill ondor holiding.
Is 11quRaction Lhn only i
_c I
.., u t, t.e 3.
!!ow Esa w e.
get up.to4te boetsig logs and test reports so that we're not ulvays tvviv ing old data.
u 9.
V!bratton analysis.).m to turhines operating?
- 10. etaximun ad.)ostrwne of sencrator pedostals?
- 11. Can building utilities take sec clecent induced loads?
- 12. f.aodas in foundation anterie t, where are these, how were they caused, how can they be defined?
- 13. Settlement of forms during placement #docomancation there_of ?
9ervico Wat.5r Pitmp.9traictitro 1.
Is there a control point e canetlever? If not, why not?
2.
Scinnie. af fects on fill under cantilever?
3.
What about loss ot fines via dewatering under cantilever?
4 What ts the rationale for v cp holas in the retaining walls?
5 Menedial rwehod pile destgo, including loadsussa.
l-6.
What ahnut the runt of the foundation a, the pt. of cant 11eveY and the
$gu between that pt. snd the supportive pile.
le soil hearing capacity re{ulted 1 A kb "td 4
4 6
4 e 8 9 0
._m
Auxtlar / P.alldi ng and Valve Pit s 1.
Dettan of renedlai caissons' 2.
Detstis or r.*midial action plan.
3.
Origin of meer la valve pit arca? Whp seas there no concern in origi([i\\l
.testan for ground w tor and liquefaction?
4.
Foundetinri uwttertal inndee valve pie floor.
5.
Een will new - cetante analysis be acenmpit shed and avellabic tot revieN '
Rorated Water St_orage Tanks
'l 1.
L'cight of Water for test vs.4,of horated water.
2.
Why are the rings cracked?
3.
Lusd test secas to have insufficient louds.
4 Where Ia this building, on the ticie se ttlement c.u rve ?
5.
notatta of the load tent xuch as dkregt fon.
6.
We would like to observe tanka und broken rint,.
T 7
Seinnie cunniderattona.
w9 9,-
--,r-7-e
-.m--
-y--tw-,--,,-y--
*e*
w II dorground Dtenel Fool Tanka
~
A to be do ntered?
1.
tilty are tauku hvid dows it area is w
?.
Destmi of hold down systest 4pinst boy.a utch and ut thout fuel.
3 01f ferentidl settlesent, lh term m.initoring plans Seis,$.u 4
unu ide rations.
Ifnderf,round Piping and Conduits 1.
341 ding sterial, thrust blocks, etc.
2.
Dif furential setticements concerns.
1.
'htch pipes are Corps to b+ conciarned with?
4.
Calnaic conn Ldaratlannn.
5.
Corru sive ar tect due to enhedemnt ist mulig Me.L'c. protection?
6.
Livu loads buried piping?
Ce ne ra,1,@ic,s t,t,on.,s,s TI l.
L'het are the <1uality Afrm sa.
ProporJRi s
-~
!e~
o f.
'a
~
a 4
mild like to phserve boring procedure?
3.
Ilow can the Corps be F.ept up to date on partinent cIsanges and data
@ c llvi,4+4 3 6.
Acertos capacity for all noll mitart.11a supporcisig the Category I questions?
I.
I.ateral load considerations durie.g liquefaction for all buildings.
a 4
-N # * * *
=4=,g, e-w.
m e ag
,,,,g,,
g
..