ML20094G556
| ML20094G556 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 02/10/1983 |
| From: | Cook R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19258A087 | List:
|
| References | |
| CON-BX15-022, CON-BX15-22, FOIA-84-96 NUDOCS 8408130356 | |
| Download: ML20094G556 (3) | |
Text
_.
c.
e* [8Co,'c, e
UNITED STATES
,s
<f NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- f. fg..
g REGION lli
^
7. ' gl{ g,,
g-799 mooSEVELT moAo 2,
t.
j g
CLEN ELLYN, ILLINots 60137
's,
. 1
,F
~
~
February 10, 1983
' MEMOPANDUM FOR:
W. D. Shafer, Chief, Office of Special Cases, Section 2 FROM:
R. J. Cook, Senior Resident Inspector, Midland Site
SUBJECT:
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT Attached is the status report for the Midland Nuclear Construction Site covering the period of January 1,1983, through January 31, 1983.
The status report contains the. input from each member of the Midland Inspec-
~
tien Site Team of the Office of Special Cases.
d R. J. Cook Senior Resident Inspector Midland Site Resident Office cc/ attachments R. F. Warnick R. B. Landsman
'R.
N. Gardner B. L. Burgess 9
B408130356 84071g f[g } $ lQ$3 PDR FOIA RICE 84--96 yng A
r-1
SUMMARY
'CF SIGNIFICANT MIDLAND ISSUES 1.
Heatinc, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)'
u kE-* of Consuners Pcwer Company, Bechtel Power Company, and Zack Company conducted a meeting on January 27, 1983, to finalize comments to resolve the issue of requalification of Zack Company welders and to justify prior welding.
Final comments concerning the requalifica-tion of welders will be implemented into welding procedures.
Requali-fication of welders is expected after final approval and qualification of welding procedures and the completion of welder retraining.
The NRC Rl;I has established a hold point prior to restart of welding to review welder requalification procedures and to observe procedure and welder requalification.
2.
Electrical Installed cable reinspection continued with no additional improperly substituted cables found.
Currently six substituted cables of approxi-mately 6,000 cables inspected have been identified. Approximately 2,600 cables remain to be reinspected. All cables were installed in Class lE electrical systems.
The licensee is evaluating the safety significance through the use of a nonconformance report.
3.
Remedial Soils Work Authorization
' Work continued on underpinning piers 12 East and 12 West.
The excava-tion for the piers is down to the bell area (the base area of both piers),
and reinforcing bass are being placed in pier 12 West in preparation to pour pier concrete.
The NRC authorized four point jacking of the feedwater isolation valve pits (FIVPs) in preparation for starting excavation of pier 9 In addi-tion, probing for electrical duct banks around the borated water storage tanks' (BWSTs) foundations was authorized and is a prerequisite for foundation rework.
4.
Consumers Power Company Construction Completion Program On January 10, 1983, Consumers Power Company submitted a letter to the NRC detaillag the Construction Completion Plan (CCP) which was initially presented on December 2,1982. After NRC review of the letter, an onsite meeting was held on January 20, 1983, between NRC inspectors and site management to clarify and answer questions.
A meeting will be held on February 8,1983, at 9:00 AM for Consumers Power Company to present the CCP to the NRC in more detail. After the formal meeting between Consumers Peter Comp &ny and the NRC, the public will have the opportunity to ask questions of the NRC.
e
.5
n-
~
- ;s
- .
5.
Enforcer.ent Conference An enforcer.ent conference was held on January 18, 1983, in the NRC Region III of fice.to discuss the results of the diesel generator -
building inspection. As a result of the discussion, further inspec-tion was performed January 19-21, 1983, to obtain additional infor-mation regarding IPINs and closecut inspections.
9 5
?
e m.
e 2
. O,~y.,.:. e'
- j"3w 8 "' Gv,%
UNITED STATES
,,,S
.?
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
! 'f
. /{ ' %_
REGloN lli
~ 0 *k... JI'.i-7es mooseveLT mo4o
/I G LEN E LLYN, ILLINotS 60137
's, ;*-
JAN 1 1 198 7 MEMORANDUM FOR: James G. Keppler Regional Administrator
.FROM:
R. F. Warnick, Act:.ng Director, Office of Special Cases
SUBJECT:
MIDLAND MONTHLY STATUS REPORT Enclosed is the monthly status repcrt for the Midland Project.
The report is for the period of December 1, 1982 through December 31, 1982.
R'Fel d
/
R. F. Warnick, Acting Director Office of Special Cases a
Enclosure:
As stated
-cc w/ encl:
D. G. Eisenhut, NRR J.
H.' Sniezek, IE O
s 9
e D~
rn4 s a
r d / 4 P w 5 p; i
~
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III MIDLAND MONTHLY STATUS REPORT DECEM3ER 1 - DECEMBER 31, 1982 9
+
t t
O 9
e
i W
i k
SUMMARY
OF'IGNIFICANTMIDLAND'kSSUES S
\\
1.
Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning-(HVAC)
The licensee, as a result of audits of HVAC work activities, determined that welder ceytifications and welding procedure qualifications were inadequate. All' safety-related welding on HVAC was stopped by the' licensee on November 30, 1982, and 151 craft workers were laid off..PNO-III-82-130 was issued.
During this reporting -period the -licensee has begun developing a new set of welding ? procedures.\\-
s 2.
Electrical The licensee continued electrical. cable reinspections. Two (2) additional improperly substituted cables have been identified.
A total of six (6)ssubstituted' cables, of approximately 4000 cables reinspected, have been identified. Approximately 5000 cables remain to,be reinspected. '
m, 3.-
Remedial Soils Work Authorizntion-On December 9, 1982, the NRC, authorized the licensee to commence construction work 'on piers 12. East and 12 West under the Turbine Building. On December 13, 1982 Consumers Power Company began work on the piers. During excavation for pier 12 the licensee ran into concrete fill. EThe chipping and removal of the concrete hascausedthework,co(proceedslowerthanthelicenseehad previously expected. y }
4 Consumers Power Companp Construction Ccmpletion Program On December 2 -1982, Consumers Power Company presented to the Region III staff a plan to establish confidence in the adequacy of safety-related' work at the Midland Site.
The licensee's initial Construction Completion Program'(CCP) required a substantial reduction in most of the safety-related work activities and a subsequent r' eduction in the workforce involving approximately 1100 people.
Implementation of the CCP required removal of construction equipment from 'the work spaces and building cleanup in preparation for a echplete QC' inspection of every safety-related system in every area.
PNO-III-82-131 was issued.
Region III has prepared a draf t report of the October-November team inspection.
Escalated enfortement action is.being considered.
An enforcement conference wich'the licensee is scheduled for
(
January 18, 1983 in RIII.
l t
L'
m.
=A meeting was held on December 7, 1982 with IE, NRR, and ELD to discuss the findings of the RIII October-November team-inspection and the licensee's_ proposed construction completion program.
A-meeting with the licensee to' discuss the CCP is scheduled for February 3, 1983 in Midland.. It will be open to public attendance.
e
+
6 9
6 e
e
r MIDLAND MONTHLY STATUS REPORT s
Midland Site Inspection Team efforts at the Midland Construction Site during the moach of November were concentrated on the completion of the Diesel Ce erator Bu'ilding inspection. The inspection was completed on November 25 and the inspection report is currently being written.
Significant inspection findings are being evaluated by the Region III staff.
Remedial soils work continues based on a work agreement between the NRC and Consumers Power Company. Auxiliary building underpinning remains ha?ted pending resolution of the independent third party assessment effort.
The licensee continued the reinspection of 100% of Class 1E cables installed or partially installed.
No further underrated or undersized cables have been found as of the end of _the status report period.
A 100% reinspection of all hangers installed in CY 1980 and a sample reinspection of hangars installed after January 1, 1982 is continuing by the licensee.
All safety related welding on the heating, ventilating and air condition-ing (HVAC) was stopped November 30,-1982 after the licensee determined that the Quality Assurance Program for welder certification and procedure qualification was inadequate.
Zack Company, the HVAC contractor.
' disconrinued all walding on safety related HVAC systems, laying cff 151 craft workers.
9 5
258 ant and 2
. pendent Assessment huxilirry Building Underpinning Meetings Attended Date Represented Purcose 10/22 Stone & Webster Resolution of Bechtel Observations and Questions on Con-struction Specifications and Procedures Observations The Assessment Team has ceripleted the review of the reports and construction documents applicable to the initia] phase of the underpinning work. Most questions have been resolved by discussion with site personnel.
The team will, commencing October 25, scale down it's presence on the site until actual start of construction.
Nonconformance Identification - Reports NIR-No. 1 - Issued 10/2 1/82 - The Mergentime Procedure for splicing reinforcing bars did noti address a specification requirement.
l.bcune bNw.
V)?br, L 5. h.v: %.
Project F.ngineef Project Manager e.
e e
e S
e 9
y, y
y
- wey,
.y.,.e.y
,y-,
-e,
,4
--,<w,-,
y-e
& & r%.'
- l As atio,'o c
UNITE 3 STATES h
NUCLEAR RESULATORY COMMISSION 8
e REGloN til 2 d %) - I 79s moossvsLT moAo OLEN ELLYN, ILLJNols 60137 DEC_2 0 G82, MDIORANDUM FOR: James G. Keppler, Regional Admini-strator FROM:
R. F. Warnick, Acting Director, Office of Special Cases
SUBJECT:
MIDLAND MONTHLT STATUS REPORT Enclosed are two monthly status reports for the Midland project. The first. report is for the period August 1, 1982 through October 31, 1982.
The second report is for the month of November. The Midland Section of the Office of Special Cases is preparing these monthly reports to enable us to keep track of the important chronological happenings at Midland and to provide a mechanism for keeping IE and NRR informed.
~
The first report proved to be repetitious of information contained in monthly inspection reports and too time consuming to prepare and read.
The second report is one page and contains all the salient information.
Future reports will follow the format of the November report.
RFid d R. F. Warnick, Acting Director Office of Special Cases
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/ encl:
D. G Eisenhut, NRR J. H. Sniezak, IE e
4 e
e e
e P
+
e U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C020f1SSION REGION III MIDLAND MONTHLY STATUS REPORT AUGUST 1 - SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 O
e d
e e
9 L
m
~
A.
SITMMARY OF-THE MONTE Midland Inspection Site Team efforts at the Midland Construction Site during the month of.0ctober were concentrated on inspection of the Diesel Generator Building. The Diesel Generator. Building was chosen to be repre-sentative of the adequacy of construction on site.
The inspection had not been completed as of the end of the status report period and will be addres-sed in a subsequent status report.
.Ramedial soils work is stopped until Quality Control Personnel are recerti-fied per an upgraded qualification program discussed in Section B.I.b.
Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (EVAC) work has been continuing under the Consumers Quality Control and Quality Assurance organization formed to control HVAC construction.
Items identified as relevant to the Part 21 of August, 1981 are reviewed, evaluated and dispositioned.
(Sec-tion B.2)
Pertaining to misinstalled electrical ca. oles, the licensee informed the NRC that 100% reinspection of class lE cables installed or partially installed
.by March 15, 1982, was required.
Also, during this status report period, the -licensee reported a potential 10 CFR 50.55(e) regarding unauthorized substitution of underrated cables.
This unauthorized substitution was de-tected as a result of Consumers Power Company modifying the reinspection requirements for class lE cables in response to -allegations received through a local television station.
The licensee has agreed to.a 100% reinspection of all hangers installed in CY 1980 and a sample reinspection of hangers installed after January 1, 1982.
Cngoing inspections during October 1982 have found additional discrepancies pertaining to classification, installation and inspection of hangers in the Diesel Generator Building.
B.
SIGNIFICANT MIDLAND ISSUES l'.
Soils a.
During an inspection, the inspectors determined that the licensee had apparently violated the ASLB Order of April 30, 1982. The licansee excavated below the deep "Q" soils, without-prior NRC approval. The licensee stated that prior approval was granted by NRR.
Subsequently, RIII issued a CAL on August 12, 1982.
The licensee commitments identified by the CAL included:
(1)
Stop all remedial soils work.
(2)
Prior co lif ting this Stop Work, the licensee will obtain prior written approval of work activities.
RIII has requested the OI to conduct an investigation into the matter.
RIII and C.PCo have established a Work Authorization Procedure to ensure further compliance to the ASLB Order.
e
~
4 b.
During the initiation.of the CPCo recertification program for all Bechtel QC inspectois integrated into.the soils QA/QC organi-zation, the RIII inspectors determined the folicwing while obser-ving several oral exams:
- (1)
The examiner would excessively repeat questions allowing the -
examinee several attempts to answer correctly.
(2)
The examiner would mark questions NA when the examinee failed to answer correctly even though the question was relevant.
'(3)
The technical portion of the exam lacked technical content
. necessary to' establish the examinee's comprehension of-the -
activity.
(4)
The examiner used a controlled copy of a PQCI to make up the exam questions which was different from anodios controlled copy obtained from the QC records vault.
Subsequently, RIII issued a CAL on September 24, 1982.
The licensee ccmmitments identified by the CAL included:
(1)
Stop all remedial soils work except for freezawall, dewatering wells and -auxiliary building instrumentation readings.
(2)
Suspend all.requalifications.
(3)
Decertify all QC personnel previously certified.
(4)
Establish a retraining program for all-QC personnel who fail recertification.
(5)
Develop written exams for racertification.
The NRC has reviewed the racertification program and authorized CPCo to commence remedial soils QC requalification activities on October 28, 1982. All remedial work will remain stopped until such time as previously decertified QC personnel are requalified.
2.
HVAC '(Zack)
In January,1981, the NRC levied a $38,000 Civil Penalty against Consumers Power Company for QA deficiencies in the installation of heating, ventilating,-and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. These QA deficiencies were noted during an investigation which transpired from March through July, 196K As - a result of this enforcement action, e
2 y
,-4--
e y-w y
-w
-ye w
y
-y ereerw
- w y
w
-r
+-
T --
n the licensee removed responsibility for QA and QC functions for HVAC system work.from the subcontractor (Zack Co.) and performs these func-tions using utility personnel.
Removing QA/QC responsibility from the Zack CompanyEhas resulted in apparent improvement in performance at the site.
In August,_1982, the NRC received allegations pertaining to QA/QC irreg-ularities at the Zack Company, Chicago, Illinois factory. Also, a potential 10 CFR Part 21 notification was made by the Zack Company to
-RIII pertaining' to discrepancies between. the welder of record and the welder actually performing the weld.
RIV, through_the Vendor Inspection
.Ptogram, performed an inspection of the Zack Company, Chicago, Illinois operation.
RIV had not issued the report on this matter at the time this report was_ prepared.
It was established that the Midla'nd Site did receive fabricated HVAC itecc from Chicago, Illinois. However, Consumers Power Company per-forms a complete receipt inspection, including visual weld inspections.
.Ihe tracking system that Consumers Power Company has established for HVAC items, allows the licensee the ab~ility to. locate any noncenforming item. - Cons.umers Power Company also has est mblished controls such that any of the suspect HVAC system components would not be covered by ongoing work until it can be established whether rework will be neces-sary. Many of the HVAC system components are fhbricated on site.
3.
Electrical
~
During the special team inspection :enducted in May,1982, the NRC identified. concerns in regards to the adequacy of inspections performed by electrical Quality Control inspectors. These concerns were the result
- of the NRC's review of numerous Nonconformance' Reports (NCR) issued by MPQAD personnel during reinspections of items previoUsly inspected'and accepc2d by Bechtel QC inspectors. The NRC required the licensee to perform reinspections of the items previously inspected by the QC inspectors associated with the MPQAD_NCR's. The licensee, in reports submitted.co the NRC in May and June,1982, reported that of the 1034 electrical cables reinspected,155 h'ad been determined to be misrouted in one or more vias. This concern was upgra'ded to an iten of noncom-11pliance and is documented in' Inspection Report No. 50-329/82-06; 50-330/82-06.
On September 2,1962, the licensee was informed.by the NRC that a 100%
reinspection of class 1E cables installed or partially installed before
.~
March 15, 1982,- was required.
In addition, the licensee was required to develop a sample overinspection program for those cables installed after March 15, 1982. The licensee, on October 15, 1982, agreed to
, perform these overinspections.
l i
4
+
3
.- _~
...~.... c-..
.U
. ~.
... - _ - = -
4 On October 28, 1982 Consumers Power Company reported a potential 50.35(e) issue regarding the unauthorised substitt'4cn of class IE cables.
This issue was identified by the licensee while performing
_the aforementioned reinspections. During the week of October 11, 1
1982, a Detroit television ' station.had broadcast a series of reports concerning construction deficiencies at the Midland site. One of the alleged deficiencies involved the unauthorized substitution of cables.
As a result of the alleged deficiency, Consumers Power Company QA inspectors modified the reinspection'requirc=cnts for the class 1E cable reinspections. This modification,' which involved determining the proper cable type by reading the ' cable jacket inscriptions rather than the attached cable tags, resulted in the identification of the unauthorized substitutions.
4.
Mechanical During the NRC-Region III team inspection conducted in **ay,1981, a Region III inspector observed that piping suspension system components were not constructed and installed in accordance with drawing and specification requirements.
In addition, the inspector determined that QC inspectors had f ailed to identify the installation deficiencies.
(Inspection Report No. 50-329/81-12; 50-330/81-12)
In response to the inspector's finding, the licensee performed an overinspection and determined that a.large percentage of rejectable hangers were not identified.during Bechtel-QC inspections.
Y A request was made to the licensee for a 100% reinspection of all hangers installed in CY 1980, and a sample reinspection of hangers installed after CY 1980.
In a letter dated September 30, 1982, Consumers Power Company agreed to reinspect 100% of hangers installed before January 1, 1981, and a sample inspection of hangers installed' after January 1, 1981.
Inspection conducted-during the month of October, 1982 has found addi-tional problems related to the installation and inspection of hangers in the Diesel Generator Building. The concern involves hangers that are built to seismic category one standards, but are considered "non-Q" by system. designation. Consumers has taken exception to Reg. Guide 1.29 titled " Seismic Design Classification," which delineates requirements for non-Q systems which could impact safety related systems during a seismic event. A letter from NRC Region III has been sent to NRR requesting resolution.
C'.
- CONSTRUCTION STATUS U
1.
Soils Remedial soils activities performed by the licensee thus f ar in 1982 involve:
4 s
.y
-y y
.__4
.,.,,.we,,,._,_~m-~,
-g
-w.-.,,,--
..-%m<.-~-
.x p.~
m
T
. Por=anent dewatGring walls, a.
b.
Temporar/ auxiliary building dewatering wells.
c.
Freezewall around auxiliary building.
O Auxiliary building underpinning access shafts to EL 609.
d.
e.
Modification work of overhead temporary FIVP support structure.
f.
Auxiliary building underpinning monitoring instrumentation.
2.
HVAC (Zack)
The'. licensee QA group has performed an audit of the on-site Zack
- Company Training and Documentation functions during October, 1982.
The audit report is not finalized, but the licensee indicated there were some " minor". findings. The Zack Company has retained a mechani-cal engineer (P.E.) - as a Project Field Engineer on site and upgraded other staff positions.
The specifications for inspecting HVAC duct work has been modified to include a provision for rigorously testing with differential air pressure those isolated portions of duct work that have either reject-
~
able or uninspectable welds that-cannot be repaired without extensive rework.
If the questionable welds maintain integrity throughout the pressure testing, it is planned to make an acceptable engineer dispo-sition based on the test.
Consumers Power Company QA is performing a 100% overinspection on all ongoing welder qualification in accordance with an established and approved inspection plan. The individual performing the inspection must be certified by AWS as a qualified welding inspector.
Approximately 25% of all HVAC quality items have been accepted by the.
- licensee, c3.
Electrical As of the'date of this report, a significant amount of electrical cable installations, cable terminations, raceway installations, and equipment installations has been completed at the Midland Site. The bulk of present cngoing work activities continues to refleet these activities.
Overall electrical construction status is estimated to be as follows:
a.
Conduit installations 91%
b.'
Wire and, cable installations 91%
c.
Cable terminations 79%
d.
Cable tray installations 100%
" Equipment installations 98%
]
e.
4 5
. - ~ ~ ~~. nmm. = ;e., ;
. u.,-,.,,.
_n
.... a J-
.-. 4-- -
..~-.,
m.
m-
'm j';
4.
Mechanical As of the date of this report, a significant amount of small and large bore piping has been complete'd at the Midland Site. The bulk of present ongoing work activities involve hanger and instrument impulse line
-installation. Mechanical construction status is estimated to be. as follows:
a.
Large pipe installations 98%
b.
Large pipe hanger installation 95%
c.
Small pipe installation 95%
d.
Small pipe hanger 81%
e.
Mechanical equipment.
99%
-5.
Miscellaneous a.
Formation of Cffice of Special Cases
-In' July,1982, the Regional Administrator formed the Office 6f Special Cases (OSC) and assigned Mr. R. F. Warnick as the Acting Director. This office has full responsibility for inspection activities at the Midland and Zimmer nuclear facilities.
Under the direction of the Acting Director, OSC, the Midland Section was. formed consisting of a Section Chief, two Regional-based inspectors, a Senior Resident Inspector, a Resident Inspec-tori and a full-time Resident Secretary.
The majority of inspection effort conducted.by the Midland Section was related to the soils remedial work. This work is described in Sections B.l.a. and b. of this report.
b.
Stone and Webster Assessment of the Soils Remedial Work The third party independent assessment team reported to the site on September 20, 1982. Since that time,. reports have b.een sent to the Resident Inspector office.
A review of these reports
-' reveal no significant issues have been identified. These reports-and Nonconformance Identification Reports are. enclosed as attach-ment A to this report.
D.
COMMUNICATIONS 1.
Enforcement Meetings t}one 6
6
,,,-ee
,p~,,,-
- - -. -. g n
.y-
.-y-
-n,-..
c---n--
n,,y-w,---
--m,,
g 2.
Management Meetings August 11, 1982 Meeting with CPCo Management regarding soils remedial work taking place without prior staff authorization. Considered a potential viola-tion of a Board Order.
August 26, 1932 &
Meeting between CPCo Senior Management, September 2, 1982 D. Eisenhut, and J. G. Keppler to discuss imC's concerns with Midland and possible reconnended solutions.
September 8, 1982 Meeting with CPCo management, NRR, and Region III to discuss Consumer's draft proposal for a third party independent assessment.
No conclusions reached.
Licensee was advised to submit their proposal formally.
September 15, 1982 Meeting between Region III and CPCo lawyers to establish when NRC investigation of Gu) allegations would be completed.
September 28, 1982 Meeting between th'e Midland Inspection Site Team and members of Stone & Webster and Con-sumers Power Company to introduce the Third-Party Independent Assessment Team for the remedial soils work.
October 29, 1982 Meeting in Ann Arboi, Michigan between Region III, Region IV, and Bechtel management to discuss ' NRC concerns wi'th Bechtel performance and reconmended solutions.
3.
Public Meetings August 5, 1982 Meeting in Midland, Michigan between Region III and CPCo Management to discuss disagreements
[
regarding the Systematic Assessment.of Licensee Performance (SALP) report and CPCo's May 17, 1982, response to this report.
September 29, 1982 Meeting in N.ciand, Michigan between Region III and CPCo Management regarding the requalifica-
~
tion and certification of all Bechtel QC person-nel at Midland.
7
- c. ;
p.
Oc cber. 25, 1982 Meeting in Bethesda, Maryland between NRR, Region III, CPCo Management, and CPCo contract personnel to discuss third party independent assessment.
4.
Other Significant Meetings-None r
. [ -'
/
e 4
k 8A 9
i gr 6
3-6 e
O G
e d=:
8 g
,._,_.3
--vv e-h
---7'-9
S ro.'! I 6 WC?..SY rr.R ENGIN E E. RING CO.:R PORATION
.245 9avvts S t a nt. B c s t o N.
M A r s a n. sc r T s aLO**fS ALL C*Amtbea%3CNCE TO PC PC1 0325 i= C b t.* *. waSb 02107 wh u 7tLCh bd cC/04
=ps
-P4Ob77 Oth.6m
- 4. e.
8 0.% t.'.8 9 4 7 0m s-e.
es.t.
Esa. %atee=s t....C C O* 6 6.T e = 6 e: >*
t%& %f t es%6
.:.. 3h
.-..... - ~
,.~ :.n
....,:c:.
- -i d 5
- ,,t. s *:vei s a Eegul atory Co cissico Septer.h r 29, 1982 vi 81 sad Si: e E'si ian t Inspection Of fice tru:e 7 J.C.Nc. I' 35E. 06 Midl and, MI 4S640 Fef. MPE-1 At:ention Mr. R. Cook
Dear S ir:
PI: DOChTT No. 50-329/330 MID'.A.N r ?!.;NT
- UNITS 1 AND 2
.. _ _.., _..-. or.4"6. il,
- a. gv. S UIv. n?. Nw-s-'s.,. N T. :r. i.N G r..i;v r. :....s..c..r_e c... e.e.* *.
A.
v A c: :.- e' h 6
. cie -? :td e n: Ar.r er s.;-r.: ef th e.*. vi ' : c v.
7.uil din.c r. > r,i nni nS
- /u k1 ;. T., 4 ::.A o. I f or t he
.e ri od r ep: e.-b r I F :. : c ugh 26, 1952: i s enclosed
. : : h t 'r i.e '. e : : e r.
I f...' u ' ave a n.e c.ur s t i cca. wi th re s ac:
to this r e.-e r t, pl eas e cent act :ne at ( 61 7.1 't?-2067.
Wr v tr it'. v.va urs,
I l
( w=~
n A. 5:anley Luc xs
?roj ect Manager En cl osure ASL: ch 4
- s. v,,...,.....y, OCT' 5 G32
c.
J.O.No. P-358 Mi d: cod Plan:
Uni t s la nd 2 I nde p'enden t A rs.c;ss.:wn t.
Auxili ary Buil di ng Und er pi nni ng Week 1 v R etor t No _1 Sept ember 19 'through 26 1982
~
'Tersonnel on-S it e e=
Stene & Vds: er Inginee ri ng Cor; ora: ion f.c TC)
W. E. Kilker 9/20/82-9/26/S2
?. 3a rry 9/20/82-9/23/82 L. T. Kouen 9/20/82-9/24/82 E. Fel singer 9/20/82-9/26/82' A. Scott 9/20/82-9/26/82
.A.
S. Lucks 9/21/82-9/23/82
' Pars ens, 3rinker.hoff, Quade, & Douglas (FBQD)
P. Pa ri s h 9/21/S2-9/24/S2
~
J. Fa:ner 9/22/S2-9/04/S2 Ac tivi ti es
, Thi s re p r ' s t== ari ce s the fi rs t week of activi:ies and ebs ervati ens of the 5".IC ' i nde pe nd en t a r s e s s= en t :ea= (including the F.:@ prsc nn el).
The t e am,
-hi ch at the pres ent time cohsists of seven engineers re pres en:i ng Geotech -'
nical, Structural, Construction, and Quality Assurance dis ci plines, arrived et--the si:e between -Sep:enber 20 and Sep:cs: ber 22.
The.' ass erscent- ' te am has established separate on-site office space and has contracted f or clerical assistance.
Introductions of all team members. vere made to on-site personnel repres enting c
Bechtel Enginee ring and Construction; Cons tner s Power Cc pany Quality Assu ance and Quality Control; -Wiss, Janney & Els ner (WJ&E) Ins t r t:se n t at i on Moni torin g; and Margen:ic:e Construction.
Tours and bri efings of the sarious areas and ac:ivi ti es rei a:ed to : the,, unde pi nni'ng vere 'gi ven throughou: the we'ek ' a t :he recuest. of.:he assesscent t e am.'
in clud ed in th es e tours and briefings were the in place access shaf:s and TIYT superstrue:ure
- supports, the dea;-seated ben ci= arks and rela:ive mo:5 cc me as ur e.en: 3: atiens, ' the e xt ens om e: er-and strain page ins:rt=en:a:i on ins: all ari ens, the crack capp-ing, the VJ6I i ns tr tn.e n: s t i er. moni t e rin F and data re cor ding s t ati on, the lagging and reinf or cing har f abri cati on sheps, a nd the mat eri al t es t i ng l aborat ory.
- Also, the ass esscen: team pe ri odi e'a!1y obs eived the verk on the coch up pier (loca:ed near the Outage Building) and the j a: kin g s:and mock up (l oc at ed
.adj a:en: to the I ag;i ng f abri ca:i en sher).
All !ar-ing and shnring vare in place on.:he nc k-up prior to the cac's arrival on site, but oiservations 15X21435E.05
u-re r:rd e of the rei nf c.r o. :nt in.st all eti on and the pl ate:: ent of c c,r.c r et e i n-the 1e-er half of the pier. Th ree m.v.bers of the aer e r.sr.en t t< <= n : r.- r e d t h e-pi er for fi rs t i.a nd obs erva t i on s of the ins t al l at i on.
The Q::ali ty Cont rol accid ries.ad do: mentation pre pared prior to reic'ase f or concrete place ent wde descrit ed and/or provi d< d as re gaest ed by the t c/im members.
Daily meetings were held starting September 21 between personnel repres enting the ass ess.ent. t' am, 3*ch t el Engineering ' and C on s t r uc t i on, and C ons u :e rs
? eve r Ccr.pany Engine + ring and Quality Assurance.
These meetings provided a f o::at for the as s es sment - team to re qu es t inf orm a t i on and cl ari fi cati on as well as to ' dis cuss obser.ations.
Me: hers of the. t eac: have read the Sur:cary of Soil s-K el at ed ! ss ;es ?.eport and are re viewing. applicable speci ficatiens, drawings,- cc.ns truction, and Qu ality Control procedures, instr =ent moni toring procedures, and 7.' s n t Quality A ss urance doctnents.
An ass essment team Proj ect Manual has been prepared that i,a cl ud es the Proj ect Ortsni:ation Qu ali t y Assurance Plan and re por ting
'and do:u entation
- ire ced ur es.
Meetines Mt e R e pres ent ed Pur po s e 9/20/82 Stone & Webst er I nt r odu ct i on to
~
Cons.cers F ower Co.
Site Persennel 3echt el M e r ge n-i= e o/21/S2 Stone 4, Webster Daily Meeting thro :gh Parsons 9/25/82 Cons tners ?cr er Co.
3echtel Observatiens The assesscent team received f ull cooperation of on-site pe rsonnel.
Ind e pe n-dent of fice space and t elephone co:cunication have been provided. Cons t=ers Fe er O c_ pa n y and 3e cht el pe rs onnel have complied wi th team regaests for to er.isting inst allations, briefings, doctments, and records.
access f I
- e (2 L h.D..}. 24
- /.o.
Froject Ingi nee r Frej ect Mana ger O
e k
EF115 258.06'
-..,.,n.
4,,
g STONE 6 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 SUMMEM S Tn RET, B cSToN. M ASS ACHUSETTS Amances ALL ConnesPONSENCE TO P.O. SOX 1328. SCSTON. MASS. 01107 w y.TELg2 SA CCCt
- i:';..
==o*"
- ':::"'" " ^
- .';0"'*"
%.7.',*.*,
n';'.IL*."'.
.O. m 7,,;,..,...,g..
United States Nuclear Regulatory Cournission October 12, 1982 Midland Site Resident Inspection Office Route 7 J.O.No. 14358 Midland, MI 48640 Ref. MPR-2 Attention Mr. R. Cook RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNING-REPORT NO. 2 A copy of the Independent Assessment of the Auxiliary Building Underpinning Weekly Report No. 2 for the period September 27 through October 3,1982, is enclosed with this letter.
If you have any questions with respect to this report, please contact me at (617) 589-2067.
/ C sd.
A. Stanley Lucks Project Manager Enclos ce ASL:pms t
e BX214358-2
J.O.No. 14358 Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 Independent Assessment Auxiliary Building. Underpinning Weekly Report No. 2 September 27 through October 3, 1982 Personnel on Site.
Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC)
W. E. Kilker 9/27/82-10/1/82 P. Barry 9/27/82-10/1/82 L. T. Rouen 9/27/82-10/1/82 B'. Holsinger 9/27/82-10/1/82 A. Scott
.9/27/82-10/1/82 A. S. Lucks 9/27/82-9/29/82 Parsons, Brinkeroff, Quade, & Douglas (PBQD)
P. Parish 9/27/82-10/1/82 J. Ratner 9/29/82-10/1/82 Activities The assessment team continued their review of the reports, specifications, drawin;3 and procedures in order to gain familiarity with the initial phases of the pending underpinning work. The review concentrated on issued excavation, lagging, ground stabilization and concrete placement procedures. Discussions to resolve any questions conc'erning these procedures were held with Bechtel and Consumers Power site personnel. The plant QA program and Quality Control procedures on concrete and reinforcement were reviewed by QA team members.
The Assessment team and repre.sentatives of Consumers Power Company met with NRC. representatives. The role of the assessment team and the interaction with the various site groups, and the methods of reporting the team findings were discussed in this meeting.
Two of the team members attended a public meeting of the NRC and Consumers Power Company.
The discussion focused on the establishment of the Midland Plant QA program under Consumers' Power Company administration and control and the certification of QC inspectors under the Consumers Power Company program.
O
.BX214358-2 e
w
-,,.m
,-,.,7 9 - --- -, - - - - _
-.-.----.9r.-
9----..y
,,.,e
+
2
-Meetings Attended Date Represented Purpose 9/28/82 Stone & Webster Introduction of USNRC Consumers Power Co.
and Assessment Team. Discus-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory sion of Assessment Team's Commission role.
9/29/82 Stone & Webster Public Meeting - Discussion Bechtel of QA Administration and USNRC QC Certification.
Public 9/30/82 Stone & Webster Presentation of Underpinning Consumers Power Co.
model.
Bechtel 10/1/82 Stone & Webster Weekly Soils Review Meeting Consumers Power Co.
Bechtel
~
Mergentime 9/27/82 Stone & Webster Daily Meeting through Consumers Power Co.
10/1/82 Bechtel Observations The Assessment Team has continued to receive cooperation of on-site personnel.
Team members observations, questions or ' suggestions have been given prompt and complete attention by the appropriate site personnel.
O.Aht2 -
Qb Project' Engineer s Project Manager (J BX214358-2 wr-w.
rwP-9 ee-w+---'
yy &w-M
-%y*-g
--q9 wr W-r y&
v up y
-gv--
M-w---
-e
--*'-W~*
-Wg+ = *w-
-'e
m Dr
- a. 1 -
STONE 6 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 SUMMER STREET. Boston. M ass ACH U SETTS ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO P.O. BOX 2323. 80STON. M A S S. 02107 W U. TELEX 94-0001 oss ca s,.UCTf oM L*.',*a "rJ"'!,,o~.
- .".'r.".* a" t"."
- Tlt"M'.".*.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 13, 1982 Midland Site Resident Inspection Office Route 7 J.O.No. 14358 Midland, MI 48640 Ref. MPR-3 Attention Mr. R. Cook a
RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNING-REPORT No. 3 -
A copy of the Independent Assessment of the Auxiliary Building Underpinning Weekly Report No. 3 for the period October 3 through October 9, 1982, is enclosed with this letter.
If you have any questions with respect to this report, please contace =e at (617) 589-2067.
A r
y,;. /
- WW A. Stanley Lucks Project Manager Enclosure ASL:==m
\\
e e
- ~
lC L 1
J.O.No. 14358 Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 Independent Assessment Auxiliary Building Underpinning Weekly Report No. 3 October-3 through October 9, 1982 Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC)
W. E. Kilker 10/5/82-10/8/82 P. Barry 10/4/82-10/8/82 L. T. Rouen 10/4/82-10/8/82 B. Holsinger 10/5/82-10/8/82 A. Scott 10/4/82-10/8/82 Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quade, & Douglas (PBQD)
P.. Parish 10/4/82-10/8/82 J. Ratner 10/4/82-10/8/82
- Activities
-The start of the underpinning work has been delayed pending the recertification of the' Soils Remedial-Quality Control Inspectors.
In the interim, the Assess-
. ment team members have completed the' review of several of the construction specifications and procedures associated with the-initial phases of the_under-pinning work.
Team member questions or observations have been presented to site personnel for resolution.
- Several of the. team members toured the off-site concrete batch plant and received _
~
a briefing on the plant lay-out and production procedures.
A general interest-
)_
tour of the Auxiliary Building and Reactor Containment Structure was given to all of the team memoers by site engineers.
~
Observations were made of the un'derpinning contractor performing routine back-packing maintenance with sand and excelsior on the access shafts' lagging.
y
- ,e e-
-er.r esee-.,
-e iw
-eve---
3 m
--,-w-
-r.,- - -,
-e--
w--
e-.--m
,e.w.
v
.,-3-er--
t-
E
~
j.
2 Meetings Attended Date Reoresented Purcose
'10/8/82 Stone & Webster Weekly Soils Review Meeting Consumers Power Co.
Bechtel Mergentime 10/4/82 Stone & Webster Daily Meeting through Consumers Power Co.
10/8/82 Bechtel Observations Fa=iliarization with the specifications, drawings, and construction procedures associated with the initial phase of construction is generally complete.
Observations and questions from the team members on the construction documents have been discussed with site personnel.
a),diJbw V
Proj ect Engineer Proj ect Manager V
I e
e eq l
O
~
--p
-w n
e p n w -- - -
--e
-=-e,~e--,-
--v-n
--m
- ~~
r --
1-STONE 5 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245. SUMMER STREET. BCSToN. M ASS ACH U SETTS ACORESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO P.O. SOK 2325. DOSTON. M A S S, 02107 w U.7ELEX.9. 0001 0,He C msTowC,*oM
- "':" ~" " '
" :?."",,..
- "'f.*?.*.
- "*1M6".*,..
.? ". ". ~.i, * ". '.*c."
wi ro United S tates Nuclear Regulatory Commissien Octobe r 18, 1932 Midland Site Resid'ent Inspection Office Route 7 J.O.No. 14358 Midland, MI 48640 Ref. MP R-4 Attention Mr. R. Cook
. RE : DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDIAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPLNNING REPORT NO. 4 A copy of the Independent Ass essment of the Auxiliary Building Under-pinning Weekly Report No. 4 for the period October 10 through October 16, 1982, is enclosed with this letter.
If you have any questions with res pect to this report, pleas e contact me at ( 61 7) 589-2067.
A. Stanley L ks Project Manager Enclos ure
.ASL:ck I'
l-
>~
s n y
$ l d/ V @ lW 0
l BX214358-2
'J.O.No. 14358 Midicnd Plant
~
Units 1 and 2
+
Independent Assessment
- Auxiliary Building Underpinning Weekly Report No. 4' Octobe r 10 through Octobc r 16, 1982 Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC)
W. E. Kilker 10/12/82-10/15/82 P. Barry 10/12/82-10/15/82 L. T. Rouen 10/11/82-10/15-82
- 5. Holsinger 10/11/82-10/15/82
'A.' Sco tt 10/11/82-10/15/82 Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade, & Douglas (PB@) '
J. Ratner 10/11/82-10/15/72 Activities The Assessment Team completed the review of all construction specifications and procedures associated with the initial phases of the underpinning.
Faniliarization with the drawings and Quality Assurance / Quality Control procedures continued.
Discussions with site personnel were h eld to resolve questions and observations on the various construction documents.
Team memberr read the portions of the NRC's Supplanental Safety Evaluation Report No. 2 applicable to the Auxiliary Building Underpinning.
The team members attended the site Soils Training ' Classes on quality plans, soils work permits and coordination forms.
Meetings Attended Repres ent ed Purrose 10/11/82 Stone & Webster Daily Meetings through Consumers Power 10/15/82 Bechtel 10/14/82 Stone & Webster soils Remedial and' Consuners Power Training Program 10/15/82 Bechtel Cours es Mergentime.
10/15/82 Stone & Webster Weekly Soils Consumers Power Review Meeting Beiche el Mergentime d
Observations - None h$hu 0'l-Proj ect Engineer Proj ect Manager cggegn-g.,
- - - - - - - - - " ~ - ~
J.O. Na.. 14 3 5 8
}fid1'end Plant U$ita 1 ond.2 Ind3 pendent Assessment
- . Auxiliary Building Underpinning 1
STONE AN: iiEESTE: ENGINEE.ING CORPORATION P0N ~.O N F OR*.A'. E;10ENTIFICATION REPORT 10/24/82 DATE 0: NONCONFORMANCE:
g;; N n,.
IDENTIFICATION /!.0~ATION OF ITEMS: Procedure for Mechanical St,11eine or Reinforcement-(MCP 16.000: Rev. 3.1 e
DiSCRIPTION OF NONCON~OR".f-NCE:
Technical sneciriention for Underninnino.
of Auxiliarv Buildine and Feed <ater Tsolation Valv. P4tn (nara i
11.5.3-r) recuires subcontractor's procedure for % chani cal Splicing of Reinforcement to nrovide a method of machan4ca11v locking the nosition splices.
The Merrentime Procedure does not nrovide for ma ch ani e n 11 v i
locking sp_1 t c e s.
t Ihli!ATOR:
DATE:
PROJECT M*NiGEMENT CONC'JRRENCE:
Ms.dsku G.JLL.>cng CORRECTIVE ACT10t. EY:
(IDENTITT lT'2ISTIITTUN TAKIN5 CCRRECilVE ACTUh) l IhlTIATOR CO.NCURRENCE:
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONCURRENCE:
DATE:
as upp-W
.eP 4
>d<m-y-.-cp r-%--,,,-%,,%-we.,,.,,,,.-.,3,-----,-,e..-.---.w-
,--..,-,-----.--_w,,,e----e-.,,-,-w,.c-,.m
,,m..----e---,.
E r c,' t :*. E r 00 60.;r f E-2.s~
A::a:r.ser.: 1 Fage 1 of 1 5'.'O N'~ a'
'n':~ '.C '. - '. c.'w- ' t. "r. : r'. '..'m' '
- r. 0, D "r. ' ~.10 n
r 3
- v n.
NONCON"0;*. MCI IDENTIF10ATION REPORT DATE OF NCh~3NFORV.ANCE:
October 28, 1982 Ti!E Number p
IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS: Technical Seeci'ientien for Un4*~9"""
e' Auxiliary Euildins and Feedvater Isolation Valve Pits. =nd =s seef A-4 CEM Series Dravinas, located at MPAAD and QC.
DESC;1FT10N OF ho c h 0;MANCE:
'I'ne M%D and QC eer. trolled ce-* +s e' th- =hev-Specification a.nd Drawins are missins the follevina chante decurents:
4C's -
1)
Specification - Specifiestien ebance Fetice (SCN)
No. 12002, 12003, and 1200k.
EC and
- 2) Drawing C1424 2 - Drawing Chanxe Notice (DCN) No. 7 MPRAD Field Change Recuest (FCR) _ No. CL7h1 and ChL85.
Ihh!T.p' ?R :
DATE:
PROJECT MAN'p~EMENT CONCURRENCE:
dyMih>:
A.S.Lodt
- 2 Barry.. Ec1 singer Cetober 28.1982 e.:2:r.- 5.
t-e..0..
By.
~~
(:DENilF ORG E AT 3N tar.JNG CURREG d'_ T TUtif l
i I
l l
151TIATOD CONCURRENCE:
?>00ECT M MiGEMENT CCNCURRENCE:
DATE:
s
.a. _
STONE 5 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 SUMMER STREET, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS ACORESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO P.O. SUX 2328. SCSTON. MmSL 02107 W y. TELEX. 944001 TON 940977 otslON CM chev wiLL. N J.
esponts (JE AMIN ATTONS CO.N S.U..L.T.I.N G..
N n
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 27, 1982 Midland. Site Resident Inspection Office Route 7 Midland, MI 48640 J.O.No. 14358 Ref. MPR-5 Attention Mr. R. Cook RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 INDEFENTENT ASSESSMENT OF AUXILIARY BUILDING UNDERPINNING REPORT NO. 5 A copy of the Independent Assessment of the Auxiliary Building Under-pinning Weekly Report No. 5 for the period October 17 through October 23 1982, is enclosed with this letter.
If you have any questions with' respect to this report, please contact me at (617) 589-2067.
A. Stanley Lucks Project Manager Enclosure i
ASL:nb
(
I D 9 f o fLI A iAn Tvi~iYt9[
I l
L
~
a.
2,t.
.ed 2.
, ndent. Asses'sment -
..uxiliary Building Underpinning Weekly Report No. 5 October 17 through October 23. 1982 Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Ehgineering Corporation (SWEC)
W.E. Kilker 10/18 - 10/20 P. Barry 10/18 - 10/22 L.T.~ Rouen 10/18 - 10/22 B. Holsinger 10/20 - 10/22 A. Scott 10/20 - 10/22 Activities The focus of.the Assessment Team effort was the disposition of numerous
' questions that had been raised over the past 3 weeks with respect to the pending underpinning construction specifications, drawings and procedures.
To this end, the team members had meetings and discussions with site engineering and construction personnel and resolved the majority br the items.
Pending items will be resolved within the next two weeks.
Temn Pkmbers -attended a critique meeting on the placement of rein-forcing and concrete in the mock-up pier.
The team was also represented at discussions of recently recorded settlement date.
Meetings Attended Date.
Represented Pu'rpose 10/18 Stone & Webster Daily Meeting through Consumers Power
-10/22
'Bechtel 10/19 Stone & Webster Settlement Consumers Power Monitoring Bechtel Records Mergentime-
- 0/19 Stone & Webster Critique of Consumers Power Mock-Up Pier-Bechtel Reinforcing Steel
' Mergentime and ' Concrete Placement 10/20 Stone & Webster Discussion of Bechtel Excavation and Mergentime Lagging Procedure 10/20 Stone & Webster Training Sessions on Bechtel Excavation and Lagging, Mergentime Jacking, and Sbil Stabilization
,w
+
e - - - --,, - -,,.,
y e--~
, - - - - - +
- +. ~. -,
,--+-=+c e-
,.m 4,
+,-e--
- c ~ - '* '
-(
U.S. NUCLEAi! REGULATORY COMMISSIO
)
REGION III r
CUTGOING TRANSMISSION SERVICE REQU{ST
\\
c:, m. - -
2l10,Q5 Number of Pagesf/]f ')
d' n (1.m n._p. g.
67wa/c.
7
~ :a: :
?
4?
!/ 9 4 )92, ;'-
i ::' crio tion _ 1nytyro k
0M&
f)hl IOkaelT3 "
$b i N_ f/u,1hbE.1....
.h 3ights "idg.
FOR WP & D/C USE
- /r (c. nrs
)I System 6 (WP) r [ t t..p.
Rapidfax b-
- 3 3M Ext #727
. "iliips 31dg.
3M Ext #728 l'
I 7,J.er sorings FTS t/.
{Uilb.te Bldg)
Commercial
,y
+
- 1 cr.<l.avt 31 dg.
Time Started 28 8
' $c. ion !
Time Completed i
" $wn (1 Trans. Time
- .. aian !V
( Actuall!.u:tss) pir.n y Ope rator ed.b
~.
.p.iene at
~ ' - - ' ' '
- v. ~ c.
en i
c u onetate Office
':d:ntify recipient & fax number i
, Vam'
' ('Hi n.1te-include fax number
.i t
- u.y 1/L q i
--e-.-~_,y-,
.-g
-c-.---.,w-.,
+---r
,e--
e
.s
. jk5is7-m.
< t 5.u1 t:.
'.':'t : T A F M (r.8 L A T M. Y CO.".':fd l5 5 lOf.
us uw; or u.- a en n : nc
. t. t.... n...::a..1 n 9
- .22',
s s. i e
F3.M:ury t oit :
T. Novak, Ar.mistant. Director for 1.icensinC, Division -
of Licensing FROX:
F.. F. 'a'arnick, Acting Director, Of fice of Special Cases SC/hG:
~ bl.GUI.ATORY Gl'IDE 1.29 EXCEPTIO.Ns r.:r fi:.; a 'r.:u: !nu In.pe:.f.10n of M1.iland the inspecturh deLermined that
..:.e' ~of ne e.s trenei C1.
c' r.ene vntor exhaust system han> crs was not.
- w:str4 t s d 4.cre,t diny. ec. t he drawines. The volds attaching the hnnrer r.c stristvrai s. ;.;+rt Steci voro found to be inadnquato.
This hc.ngcr t a : :: ni vi., i s "r. et ly ever the d !=>:el, and is clant.ified an "rion Q".
- f the m.
b.fie c' ca:.d t hu han er drcpped on t.he diesel, it could e
--@ c t h.
sit. s< 1 in.q.o rat. ive.
Trie.' I:a.;.eLers 'i-%r:vd the licenr:eu that t.he abovn condicden does not r.: e t t 'i t rs9 1r ccry cf P.cgulatery Guide 1. 29, P.)t:it. ion C.4 Position C.!.
- .. nss, ir p..rt, rhnt t.hn c.ualit.y ' ausurance rec,uirernents of Appendix B 6x.uid be pr* Int' to it11 ' these actisi t. irs af f ect. Lug t.he' functions of
' c;se r,crrie no ur n.:n-afut.y syn. term ehose failure could -reduce the fonet icitng c: -eny plant safety system. A copy'of the ke; nintory Cuide is caci MCd.
Ths. lie.: woo's position was that, t.he FSAR.- Ayyundir. - 3A, took except. ion t..:. Eer.u
- ot ry - Guide 1.29, Posit. ion C.4, and the refore, this hanner does owt have to hc cunn.ructed under Appendix B criteria.
A copy of Appendix 3A r
is lent.l osud.
- r:absecuent.1v,..t.no inspc crors had discussions with Darl Hood and ot hers ei your s t c f f a8>ot.r t.he e.shaus t system hangers., The inspectors were e.alerawd t.h..: not only are the hangers considered to be "Q", but the ditseis nxt:::u..i. pipiac, itsel f is also considered to be a tsafety related z c p.speuent..
Tsu licenus 's posi tten was tha t the exhaust piping, is a non-saf et.y relc. red cr.pptiunt of the c:::crgency syntum.
9
.U
% 1 R l /l,% I m \\,
h Didi t Yl3 T
-~
,,,,u
.m.
,r_ _, _ - -.,. -. -
-.ww
.-e
. ': 6.1,. -
2 Q. Sij us!
.* ile -ill 4.. rc.. ' wI t.h your stof f.
In udr'ition. Ve he'liuvt-t.he ret;uir,:rente a: h-p.;ctory A. cide.1.29 - Paragraph C. *., should be applicabie to Ildla:::1
.c:d s.upticew ' tri thin posf Lion should be limited rather chan :,la::L-wide.
'.Y rc.-l es t. c inri f ic ut.iun cf the !;HC position. Doun NRK accept the FS\\M, A. ge ndi:<." <:w.w; r. lun r.o RG 1. 29, C.4 ?
Are the== urgency Jiesel rencrator
<.ause system..nd hancer safety-rulated?
-i.f you !. ave any <,ut..i,tions, please cont.act either Voyne Shnf er or t nelI.
](4
{.e L%l g, w
[R. F. k'arnick, Acting, Dirc.ctor j
OEfice of Spc-cla3 Cases tsclotores:
As stated O
a W
e e
5 f-d y-,
p.
..-,v,
.-,y---,
,,.v,
,,,,-.,,,,,,r.,y-w
--,r.v
^
1,i s. cit.ic i. < R s'.: G ill W: O K Y_ C D s.. i.ils. IO N t.3;,h,,.. j
' f-
- )
t.
t.v;.
.a OFFICh.O F STAN D ARDS DI-V ELO PM ENT RtGULATORY GUIDE 1.29 SFISMIC DEStGN CLASStriCATION A.
LNT RODUCTION
- t. net of light w.ter. cooled nuclest pov.es pleas Ai.
~
sheuld be designed to withsiaud the effects of 'hc s.i.e.:al I)c ir (.::revio n 2....)es.'en R oes for SS E.
The A ih.isory ommittee on 9.r.t.frn.
P:.. e. :....c A ia.:.si %.t.:ral P% ~enr na.",of A. icn.
Safeguerds has been cor.so!!cd icprd.m t: this p.g.#
d a A. ". th : t :
D.>ign O..itos les %, s. car Pow er
?
es e >d ha c..s orteo in the rey:.. tory permon.
4.
.a
... !,ari 50,..!.,..ene ric I. ice.m:ng
...rn, to ti. t d Pr..tr.*i..
..* 1*ttheation Facilities," tequires D.
DISCUSSION
- h.' n;..Lr J-tr ;1 ant s: ac:.:res, n stems, and After resiewing a m.n.ber of ap; h.caimns for ua.-
ru, % t.g e r s 6 ; -r....qe in Q fets I e des.it n(d to A f th.
s.,:
- o.d' t he c!.,. s v..,. v.o f,.qi.a. c. s..., uic le. s o f c apa.
strt.ctio a p. rmits and opemm, e h.e nse:,
'.c a n-dHd l'If'>UII/ed % DIci HUfIC I pUh 0I p!ddI.. Ib? s'..
.. :s n. j i n w. n..i., - s r. c:s.g ir c:, ens staf f has docioped a sc.isnnc u,csegn &w.f.-
9 ni Appe.in B. 'Qnlity As iaarece Criienta for Nu.
sy stem for ide:siifyinp, those. phni fcs:ures et ho iL
. k..t res. : P:.....d Fuct Regio. e sing Plants," to be desiened to withstand the effe.-tz. c.f iht Wh
- d.!is.o i]:..lity me. ance re.
Those structures, sy stems.,,nd con:poorni: 4:*
t 8 0 C* k P. t :.0 r
- q. %:,cor. r,. ;. doign, s or ttoctin., and opera.
hould be des.igned to icer.ain f uncthmt.1 if t'. W o
< ! tc ;f ar,. -c; ph.nt s u n.;'"s es. 3 *1 cms, and orcnis h:n c been designated as Seismic ii.e yury.
. tit,
t
.... p oc. :.
t!..c ;,..: i.: or n it;g..:e the e oasequer.ces
+
of sw:ul.ac.'
ct I'.at cou'd cie.~e n...'ac risk to -
C.
IlrGUt. A TOl1Y POSITIOr'
'he br :i:h.r.J..!::s of the puNic. Ti.c pe tinynt re-I,T5c following strue:.nes, sy sicms, and ww.c.
q o'
11 ai p?) to all arin ties af-
..c.ts of a rn.clcar pouci pl. int, ine!:: Arc ti ci inc r..
t
. :s nti,,ns ant' supports. ue des:grancd as ics,.ic
'^"' #
fes tim t?.e a'i :..
1 ft:re:: ors ef thrac st-ue.
,i sa..
3.ory I and.l.n :Id be de ip ed to with> >ini ihe ef f. c!.
.; os.enn.
u:es..,
- n>.
of the SE and semain func:ional The pertir.can w, s
s
.Cc.i i s m i c.. n..a Cc oloe e Sising 2
.,. ; p e i. i o s e.
a Crueria for St.. ' s.. Pi.wcr Phcitt," to IU Cl R Pr.it I'F
'"#"DC' '"4"I*"'"
"I '\\ ppend u. a to W '.
6 100. "Reactu.%c Csiteria," reydves that all nu.
Part 50 should be applied to all activiuc s ahteinc r? o be desi;ned so that, if the Safe the safety related functier.s of thesc sin.et.on, m cicar n.we:
t
.j e,imdow n Ear.' 3...Le t.SSE) occurs, certain strue-tems, and etunponenn.
i tures, systems. and comporients ternain functional.
- a. The scactor coolant pressure bour..%:y.
T'iese niant fe.v. es are those v.cceuary to ensure (1)
- b. The scactor enre and reactor,cuel hucrna.t the ir.:cgrity oW rexior coo?ar.t pienure boundary, t'; :he capahlt". to shut dewn :he reactor and runin.
i
- c. Surems' or port ons of syttems ; hat aic...
trin it in a safe s'..:rdow n cr.m'ition, or (1) the espa-qui #ed fo'r (1) einerrr.ncy core cooling, W pas: ace b:my te preur:' te ~utirate the consequcnces of ae.
eider.ts that wh' vesal: in jwrnual effsite empowres e t,,,,,,,,,a,,,,,,.f,,,,.. ;,,, n,,,,,,,,,, 3.,,,,,,,3 ;m,
tiin.pai;iltIr to t.e pasIdcline e spos.iic.s of 10 CI'R
' rt., re w. h.er > ii.ci...*.. ew.,, m<...
w v....,;..
i P.n1 100.
rp.ied u. r..;te-r!; h u.c pe..r.,4 sate 3 fu,ctioa 2:a cri sw.a pig 4r g up so anal inclusfang une f'irst ulse Dr.cluihre a...et* i s
'"his g m de.'s 1bes a nec*!.pd wh rpt.thIt to the erterf uls6 U.M it citi.cr iorer.eHs a h. ed nr ca d:e c':
m
...w,.hes, ihe ur i,, r..< non d e,. pace.
tifying and clauifying those fen.
N n C iaff for..
c
- c. mems s.was be esas en ew 5 e.eur, e' v.e Cv - e in ',
.e r g e,v., r,.
,' aC 8tr gut AICRV cou:
g,.o.,, p,e eg
' tst.
Cr5 m.
.we, co-.a ws.un. w, r.it sn. n c 72/.A Ance...
nur ne
.s. - er ow.s. ew.
- 6. a.
,m, in p.,,%, tine se f sia# o8 *=;*ge. 'Jw e. v.h pe ap s ere **r *M..*.me r P., f"e sta*.as et vrie The gu.se, e., awuss 46 she teks.v mg tw 1.%.s e%..>
=u.
era rsia! *.
C ee.s* <r s. w.,.. *
- v. eve.,
to a<.; w *g s..
- e. se=* wtee me.. er aw ri e. ate g cance.m.
I I' ".** f **. 'tre
& l'.'e-sur'viravi th C 6 8
,.~"..f.P.=...
/
=%*
ps :
,g save e.e asi s.eg M sws tre ees.a *vis one ca e
7.T
..t...
e.ar b.e=ww.s e.r ya.av.e ed==a=i. turn Pese 2 #"he8 8"81*** paarants pa.wi. p Pes.6 fer yte f.ad.egs 3 heus a==W Mee, s iadwa E Css 66*i.* 4 e
.. =ci ef s,e e e.
e 8 ***s.e**sei aM.S iac,ia
,,. ene e. t e c..o.
a.
f A....aserens.te...<
w..
.,,,,,,s v e
- rest para e' s send
<a tr ea.*
D, om
..v e :
es
.e
.e 1, wn...n e,e ts p.<
rs
- u. r.e...;
s
- . -)
P,eisee s ley emaw y c.a.se o8 km.se g..ges ! sh =,, t n.e
... m a
ir
-. w e<i....
Y.
e..
...,..,_.. i., r,s
.... i,,
e., em.g,. e,,.e e,.,
,w,--..
v., e...w i.e e n. u *. s r.,
,..e.,. ae e: e. c.-
.a.., u
..e
,.r
.rev
..-se.y.,........
ee w i.,
<,v.yan.e.wi tr.c x.e.a A e,..
w,,,
o n..m 9...,
..,t..
- ... x e,e.
a
.....s
.e
,e. _. _,
e......., e.=
cu.
7, 44 y
we.,, u~.
g
- z.,..
---g-------
s 2
.q',4 -
" w
- : e..
,i
, ? *. '.c..
- f
- hu *,...~.
.a
~
., n.
j.,
- g-
- du...sr.!
. :d..e Oh p:.. *, t i.4nt
- n. Tl e s o.o1 r...m
- . - '.:.g-o i
t r.
- p 't f. f y,h e,it. re.
egmp e.ent and all eg.apr. vm r...
d to a:n -
t.:
.. :s control. room within a.afe b..'.-i: Sility 1;: nits for personnel and safe es:sirm n:t nia! limits f e: viu'
(
m o, u : cms :,..:o are re-
.*,. o r.1 - ',
-.i !c o.iuny hral re-
.f.
t,
!s.
.. to eg.Np:hent.
. : 1..e < ?.. -
- ', -;. n! 'wel see:arr P""!
- o. Primary and rcond.cy ic.:cisn co.tLit.r'. cat e no.c.
-. n of t e u..m v. cerm of boil.
... ' c,.-[c. (. c? ' Ag f:se. the pi.icrinc st con '
- p. Sy>tems,(other than raboucthe wit r-:a y e
..'. 'ics.. !.e s:p to I :st not includir g the agement syitems, not emued by ltenc,1.ath!"ug:
u 't. s !ve, a: d s err.s eted piping of 2%
1.0 abuse that contain or may eve.tain ra n.n;tr.c n..
.. o: :.::, c:
- tr.:d, -} e Or u; to and including terial and whose postulated failure we Id (cuilt it.
. fn : ulle ' ::: iieater ov:. alls closed or capa conservatively calculated potentisi olf : uores (is-
! h of. o.:... is a t... e.'..:ing al! In: des of ruirmal 805 meteosology as reconeniended ir Rei:..h ro t )
Gu.de 1.3, " Assumptions Used for E a.::r.:ni. tiu.
i
- < ;. : <r.r.t:on. T5.c to:Mne top s abe should t..
..cd :t 6:
- i.! L'.e ME and -. intain its Potential Radiological Cernequcnces < f a 1 oss o.
Coolant Accident for ficiling Water Rr ;ctors.",c:
...... t s Regulatory Guide 1.4, " Awumptio. 3 1' ed 'f or
- f. T1.o-e p. r a..r:s o: d.c vea m and reedwater Es aluating the Potential Ratticinrical ( onse:;1rr.n e:
. w of p6. e,v.' s...:ct rs e tors estending from of a im of Conlant Accident for Preo abrd he:
- .8
- :..!- b: 3. : c w.* !aty ;de of steam ;i nerators Reactors *) that are nmre than 0.5 rer.
.o the w h.-Y
. ;z in ri.t i e:.fer, t'.c e.:.
< u c ont:dnn ent,i ols-body or ist equisalent to any part of the 1 ociy.
Qa... v., :o.! c.
. ce:d pipnt, of. 2% inches or ge:
,.c., i:..d ; !g.e
/6 ap to and itw!udir p the first
- q. The Class IE electric sptems. :.cinda.e ihr
.c; <inc;.s m: n 3 ft t,. w selli.T whe) that is either musiliary 53 stems for the ondte ele :tric rew er
..dly etc. sed u. s.:;..Nc of...t.".atie ele".,re dur-u:pplies, that provide the co.cirency e ertric pm.er
- uf.41 wt'.. of r.. n..J to..ctee.p. retion.
needed for functioning of p? ant feature incle:kd i..
items 1.s through'1.p above.
p cr.ot.;ng w..te r, compone nt coot.:ng, and
.' + 3 rec.'...! : >;, m 'p: [o tims of the se sys-L Tbc portioni, of strue'.. irs, u st m>. nr com.
ponen's whose confiniard function is'no icq;iied bur
. n., ire!. 8 np :.c :: Je stm ture>, that use re-y....d fm (13. wr r, ey nue t t >I;ng (2} pmtacci-whme failure <.ould reduce the fune:iar.ing of.my
.i*
...m,
.h...r. i !
..! o.mm al. (1) p. 3taccid. nl con-plant fi.atue insluded in iiems 1.a thno ich I n abew to an unaccept:.Ne safetv Icsel or could're> ult in i.r t it c....; *.. c <!w :p, (.n :r sidual heat re-i s..! ' c :. ibi.c... or or (5) c o-4tng the s; cnt fuel esp (itating injury to oe'cupants of the contrei reum i
,ei.otd should be designed and conuructed 30 that the SM. i
- a would not cam.e such failure.)
- h. Co..'iny w ict and seul water systems' or p.;r,Jo:.s of 1 c e >y
.ms that are re. quired for func-5
- 3. Seismic Categor:s I design requiremce. shouirl a,..:;ne of.c:n, tor..= n..mt miem s o".penent> impor-extetid to the first setsune seunamt be,ond d:e o.c.
- ant to s.dctv* v rh a> scactos s vclant pornps.
fined boundaries. Those ponions of stsuetures, sp-a
- i. Sy siems or p..rtions of sptcins that are re-tems, or enmponents that form interfaces Se wre i 8
q iired to su; ply foci for erncitency equipment.
Seismic Category I and non Seismic C:tenmy I te::.
tures should he designed to Seitmic Catemrv i
< All eterine and mech m.eal dev. ices and ca.r.
i requirements.
c.itts hetaren iiie process ind the.inp.it terminals of
- !.r. :.ctu:.ror e.sie-n inse. bed in rencrating signals
..ne penir.cnt quality a>s.rance re juinn: en'i? r!.
b
"..o retaarc p:o:c. ar.e ac 'on.
Apprndix B to 10 CFR Pan 50 >hould be.:po ed in
- 1. S t uen.s ' or ;-utions of syuem> that. re te, mH uethities affecting the safety-selated futse icn> oi qaned fo'r (1) moni*e:ing of sycen:s important to thme ponions of structoies, synems., and compo j
t.ifety and p) actu;ttion of sy >: cms irnpos tant to
,c nents covered under Regulatory Positin:n 2 and 3, -
'ove-
..tei),
.= * *.
i
- 1. %e spent feel > avare pool sinacture, melud-i' i:T the fuel racks.
gg,,r,e A ce on,as.ruc requiren.c.ns rne e w.the. u,
" 8' """' "?"'" I' " "d" d' "f"" -
- m. The reacthits connot sv>tems, e p., control 7"*heneter practical. struriuses and equirtrc' t v i.<nt
..rl m ods, eonteof f od dris es and boron. injection could rouidt3 rsuse n.ch ininir..t' cued be t, tame. v:.c;.
?>Mem.
nned so ine esren, required ic et;rn;naie niin pow tula,.
1.29-2
.a
. -- 7 7, y.,
.c g.
y,..,
,g-w ps.57.iey g.
- r...
-~ -
(*,s"..f,,' 0. D f..* 5#." M d. h.,i-3 f, b.." 4-N i, h k= y.,.Gerx~,
~,'. N I
- ~
.L w,.~.. n..
. :...e
. yc.v g..c
-n
' (*).
L'.*,.'t.L *'.i ?,i h'it Q.N
. r.
t~
- \\ ': ~-
s
. '.r. :
s
- s.. t-.;
2
.*-g n*
r i.
, ( i. n..,. i. -.. t c. ;.. s f e : f.. :n a.
r* '., !a' :'1. %~
' ' ' ' ' h' ;
,l,.
... S... t'.c N M C..'..f '" i '::
for
- i " t' ': * # i"
- "!,I"
',[
i.fi.
ei
- s. !
' ; b fo: ajr L i-
~
s Ed
- P ' ? ' ' ' s' ** ' '
. i :.. s s '....r.s t.;::':! t o : 'r.-.' l' i s '
s.
.. ' c. :s cctrent NW C r, if ; :.c ti: e m.is
- <,' - :. c
'.o : I' r * : ~;"
- 4.,;fs.I.,is.1
'.: l',o e c.i.n ir, w '.:.h clie :st,%-
a. i. w.
v.
A
.. J c
- *.s I..,.9 3
..,a-
- s. 14 _ _ _ __ __ _
.. _ _,, - e.* mr~ ~
-........ys,...- a,..
. r j..
. r
_ ?,,-
WQ6A.
..., ? ;;'.
......,... sC:. r..,. '.... -.
a..... ' ?., '..
... '.1.
~
- !.* ?
~. wr....
7 e
t., g
.i
.e v.
.M
- 1. ~.' 'y c F i M I C I 271 GN F T r. yi. ' i
- r C.
,t os (Rev.
.3, 9//G)
. 5:
. :a;o.h.: ign c ? ar n i fi < a Li on fe r p3.u:t st.ructu: ec, s yste.m, and
- 4.,. :P. :: - r : e-t.s ne ~ i nt ent of rw gul,,1 ory Guide 1. ?9.
Jr. order f.he.i nt.<-nt c f 1.he Rc;gu l a1.ory Gui de, ci-e t.t.i n w :.
,.eic:stJons 01 t b r.
gu i de a re
.r-c: :::sary.
The 103 icwing i tems
,,. :.' be i.1.ese el at. i f 5 ca t i ons.e red vpeci fi c e.xeep t i<..no to the s.
~
- Povi tion C.1. d - Syst r mn f r-qui red for reacter shutdo.n e
of ten.iduel heat remova t n.uut be designed fo r the w;t.:.
'h i s t c it,te s pre t.ed to i,, elude onl y : hor.e mi nimum
- t.-
fas
..h.i ch :r unt fune:t ion in the pc r foni.ance of mi d.- r. l y...1.u t d c e n a nd i n c..:i n t.i nance of t.hc p' ant io the
- 0. : %., q c.. id i t ion.
Fc!r t.he - t easons s t e L <. d ita renponse
- i. t h g4,:inty uide 1. / ',, t be coo'.t i ng ua Li.u-tc ths.
1,e '.de un cooli-i n i n not. d:-r i gt:ed t.o Sc i e mi e it.. l ego r. y 1 tunda dn.
The chem tca l ade'ition sys" :m Incated in a t o :.,;.-lo I.: Jt.+ c. t ed bu i l di ng i n no t de:i i gned t o S -i r.+ ! c
(;u t.egu t y 1
-y.2i rer ent.c ai nce the d.':3T and.bS can J!uvide du r r i..i ent bo ri c. ne'd for :euetor hb t dc.en/es..oldcWu a fte r a t.* inm ic ewin t..
T}m lio: i. acid
- .n-the Wr.ET.ind EBS in used to corr.p]ete at: 0 2 <iec < l y : ecd v.it.hout h2 ed shutdcwn,eco3down of t.hc s c a c t.o r piaov in ihe event thal the 1etd wn s.';i.c:n and ch.:mi c a 1.
addiiion
> y M.c : s are unavai3eble,tnd f.he most react.lve cont.r6i
- .'od i s 31.uci<. out--of the cole as described 'in iSAR sub.ect i.ons
- 9. 2.0 nnd 9. 3.10.
'r.'
Fori tion C.1. h - Since the t ea c t or. coo.l an t. pua:ps. d:. no t
.nortoim any safety function, and since faiiure of the rc..ctoe enci ont pumps. due to cool.ing water system failure does not have safety implicat.ionc (nee FSAR
- subuct ion 5.4.1) the cool.ing wa tcr sys tc.m for the c tactor cool unt tsumps i:.not designeci to vi thn tand.in M I:.
(Note:
The design has been revir.ed for great er
- r
- c..n r.c rv a t ;, str. an der.cribed fol]owing item c boJow.)
i
~ c.
Position C.1.p - This pai 491uph covers nystems, other i
.than radienet ive wast.c management. synt.etac, not noeci fic.411y addressed by the regula tory guide "that cont < tin or may contain r hdioactive material," and sei:s a dividing line between reicmic category I and nonuejsmic Category I b.$ned on. an of fuite done resul t.i ng ' fr om fai3 nte of coinpenents in the synts:ms.
The divi ding' :li ne value oC 0.S rem, which'may-be based on t.hc normal annuel relcar.e limits of 10 CFR 20, conflicts dit e-ct ly with the thi rd 'paz agraph of the i nt. oductica to the ir.d. d c.
Such systems. are not designed for the SST unless th.ti r failure would rerntlt in of fsite dones approachinc t.he guid:23 ine valuen of 10 CFR 100.
Revision 33 3A-38 4/81
p.-
N.
- e O
e e
f.
2
.a 3
. ~..
l'-
I...
t 3
.s 4
- tl
.n
.4-
,i,, ts.s
.f
.t...
e
(%.
1 s
.t, N
a s
tv s-
..-4.'.z*
, .'# i.,.
-..s 2
..c-a
\\*
e.
e.3. r e..
.s. t.
r5L
- e.. s, f.:..
..o.
c w
<..'.4...
. '*. !. r.j p g. f w..
., ' *a,, -s
.q
'.,(,.
- .. s.. *
- e 4.
..,g
.ega,.
.s w.t
.r s
' 'i 4Ai T.D I.i.! ]
. a e it~ C ' - i.e * ' O,t C
,. E '< 0.I.
S
-.... ~
. s,.;. 1 e
a l *.....
, r..s w g,...;
t.
t
.J Es j.
- .i (..
..b.,..,...
..(
.
- a. u". '..
r..* J.-
.a...
s I
nV.)
230' a ; ! ' e ; #".
'.f
- T..] U j*
4; 9
- m.
4.
.n
,.g a.
- L...,
.t.
- .s:
<:n t e:st
.t-
.GQ.'.'<*
- 't 1
d.'
e
. I :*
. i.' ' 3
- C.
E I)
.t:
- 31.. ;.I,:
- L i i ~,* *.,
f e t l U ', '. *
- d
- t ',
..s '. ',;'
- f. * "
'n-
'*. 1 *A.,- ' u','
..e r4 ! -'.... t.
v'.-
(.* '.'. s ! *
. s
. g r " ' j.ss g. }.' [ l'. i.
, i,, g i ; -, ;. } 3.
( 'j ",' i,
.}H:
.-3 0.c, t ;;.
e.-i l'. r -.. *.r. t
+
- pt, C i, i. G e7 !. 's. ; 1 C
- .*.
't e
' t
- r,I
- '.. i *,,. d. r ' ? O 'f f l
.l.
'O i'7.
- .)...p-(..
s.
.. t c.
,1 r i.. *t.e.s -..,* e.1. r.,a.=.
s a.
,e.-
i
'.as.
4
.. i r,...: (. }. u..g.
i.e)
~
...<.. f r y
(... t :.....
s
.s..
/. N.. u
.i '... W i
- l : t '.. ;
,f
" * : M b.:- < a u '. r: *}:e StM'c
- ,.... c. =
.u r
s-c~. '- e g.
.*'..Im
- s,,
e r. I. i-C' ' ' tu ; C
- t
~ '
-~
j; aw : r.: *.e
~
...s r
.'s i. t t :., L: :'
! it ! ** " i ;) '. I st t: * : 21.i. c l 04: n i
oF I t:
e c :;;. p. ". m 700l.1. 15:
- 'd l (* L'
,' (.' Ch' ) i0 31:
- l t*
- e.
- AlJo, r.n M:P p.ubs.
l. c r.. t., N.} } bt: p ~. 'O T.r.ad
'. < w r.h i '. U e.' mc ' u *
- UI t'..o r. r.e i. i hu u t, e: s 3.1. I)c:
- '.=:t
- :.i '.W d in
.WI' '4 s. : i.. ' -
5.1
.,n
..,._.,,3,
- e....,... : s,.~
e
- r.,...
- q. -
t
.o.
U,: e '.1. : ik t..'
s orv
." h t to
- s.,
. : n..
. s
'. u.. :. t; r :i l'n
.)
tto-*
ss1.* v t,
' ~, *....: an o.' t * '
V'
.1..'*<
i.r
,e a:
s n/
r...~
.: :( I e-C d.
S p
- "* i t;1C o '. '
e
- f. -
1/fl )
j-b
[, i ',
' d',..
i
= =. * -
- 4s I
J Jeries W O M w
-Q #~,'
.r,;-
dh
%er P=ssidnt r%sl*ct. 2nper i L /
and Conanction cow ;cmsw 134s w.= rare a 4.ms, waea, wt a:ct. (s1717ss.s4*s Decemb'er 3, 198C HaroldRDEntos, Director Offica of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dirision of Licensias US Nuclear Regulatory Co=ission Washington, DC 20555 J 0 Xepplar Ad=inistration, Region III 4
US Nuclear Reguistory Co= mission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Illyn, II, 60137 MIDLAND NUCIIAR cam TION ?IANT tiIDI.AFD DCCKET:NOS 50-229,30-330, MIDLAND ?LANT nm.r:.a* DENT.457?IV'P10G3Att FIIZ:
31.1.5 SERIAL:
13750
-RE72PJi'NCZ3 : (1) J V ::00X LETTER TO E R DENTON AND J G IZFPIER, SIRIAL 18879 DATED 10/5/82 (2) NRC 512f!!ARY DAIID 11/8/82 C710/25/32 NG CN INDE72NDENT DISIGN VERITICATICN Referance (1) provided a description of the !!idinnd Plant Independent Review Program. Referenes (2)' summarized the Octabar 25, 1982 meeting wherein Consumers Power Co=pany and their contractors, ifanagemann Analysis Cocoany OfAC) sad Tern, discussed in more detail' the Independent Review Program.
During this meeting, questions posed by the Staff ware responded to by the Ccapany and its contractors.
At the and of the meeting, Conan=ers Power Company rehtested the Staff to provide the applicant with poli:7 guidance en the proposed Indepe= dant Review t
Program.
The Staff agreed to provide prelisinary faedback to Csesunars ?cuer Co=pany by October 29,.1982 and to arrange for additional =eetings as deened appropriate.
This was subsequently done and an additional =eetist was ' eld on o
Novenber 5,1982 to pesvide tha !GR Staff nore details of the Stena and Vebster third party assessment of the i=plenents:fon of the soils underpt#
verk.
9 ff 9 r1 q /~)' n
- OG I O c< t u v v y ogg
J d
3ased upo: the =tening of Octo'ce 25, 1982 and subsequa=: i: dhack 5:c:.he NRC Staff, Co' sumers Power ;:oposes the folleving chs:ges to se Independen:
Review ?:os:2.n as sub=ittad in Reference (1) and discussed a: the 00:ober 25, 1932 coe i:5; (1) The th:se specific evaluations will not be ecsbined into a si=gle p:og:a=
with coordination of the individual : sports by MAC.
(2)
The Tara Isdependent Design Verification (IDV) effort will be completaly separate from the liAC effort wi h neitha subcostractor having emhe:s f:om their compa:7 isvelved in the otha: enspany's efforts.
(3) The Tara IDV vill be on the Auxilia:7 Taedwater Systas (.743) as origi= ally plan =ed, and.will also be i=plemented on ano her srs_e:n which the Staff is to select based on three candidates p:wided by Consu=ars Power Coepany on a risk assesse.ent basis. The three ca:dida e systa=s proposed by Consu=ars Power Company ara:
1 Electric Power Systan (Diesel Gamerats:)
~
a.
b.
Safeguards Chilled Wate: Systes c.
Contaic: cant Isolation System (4) Tha Tera ID7 will be expanded to i:clude s = ore in-dsp h review of construction activities to provide assu:ance of as-built co:struction adequacy of the systans inc1'uded i= the Tera (ILV).
(5) For the IDV, say discussio: ' between project person =e1 and Ts:s os confi:=ed fi=ditgs vill take place in fo'rsal aseti=gs with the N3C being motified of the meetings in ti=a to atte d, if they desire.
(6)
For the INPC Co struction ?:oject Evaluation, e copy of the final :eport will be given to the N1C when it is sent to INP0.
. We believe that this letter documents the conclusions resched betweec ou:
organizations regard
- g he Midland Independent Reviav, t
SC/G5X/bjh CC Atemic Safacy and Lice: sing Appeal Board C3echhoef er, ASL3 MECherry, Esq I"PC:Was, ASL3
.UCeok, Midland Rasident Inspector RSDeckar, ASL3 SGadler, Esq JHarbeue, ASL3 G3s: stead, Harstesd E=3 neering i
ar1137-ot?24100
~
/
a 3 _ ~ M),
+
ou T Ei., i;T :.TES
{
.i
- ' "'.t E r R P :G'.' L ?. T G A Y C C'..'
n.mn TcN. ::, c. r. 2 -
<f a
l.1'! * '
1*. :
h......-
'f_f NOTE TO:
ThomasM.kovak,AssistantDirector
'~
for Licensing Division of Licerising
-Es/
FROM:
Ronald Hernan, Project Manager!
Licensing Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing S'JEJECT:
DECEMBER 7, 1982, MEETING WITH REGION III - MIDLAND QA Per our discussion on November 19, a management meeting has. been scheduled with Region III (Keppler, Warnick, Shafer) on December 7,15i82, to discuss inclementation of QA and Independent Design Verification p.ograr.s at the Midland Plant.
According to Wayne Shafer (R:I!), the agen::a.till include:
1.
Discussion of the cremitments in the two Consurers Po>.e.- Company letters dated September 17, 1952.
These letters dealt with QA program implementation.
2.
Discussion of the results of Region III's recent " hardware" frspection.
These results may indicate a breakcewn of OA at
.4idl and.
2.
- gree upon the manner of NRC's response to the Consumers Power istters of September 17 ano October 5, 1982.
T.te 32tf g is schedulec to start at 1:00 pm and '.<ill ;rctably be held in W. Eise nut's office.
-i o
- o *,as,' o lt.
I'w-
- " s ". -
.A Ronald W. Mernan, refect "anager Licensing Branch *c.
2 Division of Licensing cc:
H. Centon D. Eisenhut W.'Johnston R. Vollmer J. Scinto W. r ten a
E. Adensam O
~
l-
m.
1 PRESENTATICN CN THE CONSTRUCTION PROECT EVALUATICN CN CCNSUMERS POWER CCMPANY MICLAND ENERGY CENTER PROICT I
UNITS 1 AND 2 1
1 1
I Performed by:
MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS COMPANY 4
March 15,1983 I
I l
f
//
,I I
- f.
1 1
1 1
.I g
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT EVALUATION SPECIFIC AREAS BEING EVALUATED I
a ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION l
e DESIGN CONTROL e
CONSTRUCTION CONTROL e
PROJECT SUPPORT e
TRAINING g
e QUALITY PROGRAMS l
e TEST CONTROL ll l
lI iI I
I
l[.
3 1
~
3
~
REQUIREMENTS FOR SUCCESS l
e CLEARLY DEFINED TEAM LEADERSHIP A SELECT TEAM WITH COMPLIMENTARY CREDENTIALS e
e SUFFICIENT TRAINING l
e DETAIL PLANNING e. SUFFICIENT PRE-REVIEW OF DOCUMENTATION l
SUPPORT OF UTILITY MANAGEMENT e
I PRE-BRIEFING OF CONSTRUCTION / ENGINEERING STAFF AS TO PROGRA e
OBJECTIVES AND MANAGEMENT'S SUPPORT PERFORMINGEVALUATIONANDSUMMARIZINGNESULTSCONSIST e
INP0 FORMAT ll COOPERATION FROM MANAGEMENT IN THE HANDLING OF FINDINGS e
L
'I l
I I
I
11080-2 3-2 TABLE 2 MICLANO CCNSTRUCTION PROZCT EVALUATICN TEAM I
1 Ccnstructicn Evaluation Manager Evaluatien Team Lecnard Kube 1
Lewis Zwissler (Team Leader)
Project Eucpert Cesign Construction Crganization Quality System and Programs Test Administratien J. Sriskin K. Horst V. Johnson L, zwi881er L. Zwissler A. Recese j
O. Hubbard L. Kube R. Kelley L. Kube J. Ccpie,-
C. Huebar l
R. Lee L. Kube J..Briskin W. Friedrich E. Schlinger
~
8 lE E
E sai!
g
11080-2 33 TABLE 3 MICLANO CCNSTRUCTICN PROJECT EVALUATICN SCHECLLE 1
CCT.
NOV.
CEC.
JAN.
I Program Planning 1
Meeting with Regulaterv I
Identify Project Overview Material and Oistribute for Review I
Occument Review Eva aation I
Consolidate Findings I
Present Findings To g
CP Co and BPCc I
Cevelec Corrective Action (CP Co Secpe)
I Issue Final Report and I
Cbservations l
I I
~
(
EiiE
EVALUATICN Mt. i HCOCLCGY l
e CCCUMENT REVIEW PRESENTATICNS (SY PRCICT STAFF) e e
PLANT WALK CCWNS 1
e CBSERVATICNS I
e INTERVIE'NS I
e CETAIL FACT FINDING e
SUMMARIZATICN 1
1 1
. 1 I
1
1 i
i i
SUMMARY
FINCINGS EVALUATICN CETAILS CSSERVED FACTS I
i CEVELCPMENT CF AN EVALUATTCN (By Performance Cbjective)
I i
1 siiii 1
\\
1
'l
\\
l i
l 1
REPORTING METHODOLOG','
WEAKNESSES WERE REPORTED IF ANY NON-COMPLIANCE WITH e
J A PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE WAS IDENTIFIED, g
SOME WEAKNESSES ARE INTER-RELATED DUE TO OVERLAP IN e
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE CRITERIA.
I GOOD PRACTICES WERE REPORTED ONLY IF THEY WERE SIG e
,j FICANT AND APPLIED SUCCESSFULLY, l1 1
I I
l1 l1
~
ly siiE 1 -.
l 1
1 1
l TABul_ATION OF EVALUATION RESULTS 1
bNCE YD EVALUATION AREA P
l 0$JECTIVES WEAK ESSES PRAC ICES-ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION 3
3 0
DESIGN CONTROL 5
11 5
l CONSTRUCTION CONTROL 7
8 2
PROJECT SUPPORT 6
7 3
TRAINING 4
1 4
QUALITY PROGRAMS 4
5 0
g TEST CONTROL 6
1 1
1 L1 I
'I
- I
,y siili I
= - - - --
l.
l 3
1 1
1 j
THE FOLLOWING ARE THE FINDINGS IN ABBREVIATED j
FORM AND CATEGORIZED INTO MAJOR ACTIVITY / FUNCTION 1
1 1
1 1
NOTE:
SEE REPORT FOR EXACT WORDING OF LEACH FINDING AND ASSOCIATED CORRECTIVE ACTION I
l E
l
1 1
CESIGN METHCCCLOGY l
FINDING DESCRIPTION CF GCCC PRACTICE C C.1-4 CCCUMENIATION CF CESIGN REQUIREMENTS ANO INPUTS CN SOME CESIGN ACTIVITIES WAS EXCELLENT 1
\\
l CC.3-2 CCCUMENTATICN OF INFORMATION FLOW ANO INTERf* ACE CEFINITICN WAS EXCEPTICNAL CN A NUM8ER CF CESIGN ACTIVITIES 1
C C.4-4 MANAGEMENT SPCNSCRSHIP CPCUALITY IMPROVE-MENT PROGRAMS HAS SEEN COMMENCABLE 1
1 C C.a-5 RECORCING CALCULATION ICENTIFICATICN NUMBER CN SELSA' RESTRAINT CRAWINGS !5 A CCCO PRACTICE 1
1 I
1 1
filiiii I
O
~*
\\
CESIGN METHCOCLCGY FINDING CESCRIPTION CF WEAKNESS OC.1-1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSIBILITY ANO MAIN-l i
.E TAINABILITY NOT SPECIFIC i
O C.1-2 OIFFICULTY IN IDENTIFYING CESIGN REQUIRE-MENTS APPLIEO IN THE CESIGN PRCCESS O C.1-3.
NEEO TO IMPROVE FACTCRING INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE INTO CESIGN O C.2-1 MISSING INFCRMATION/OATA FLOW AND INTER-FACE DESCRIPTIONS FOR CESIGN/RECESIGN g
EFFORTS OC.2-2 E-INTEROISCIPLINE TRANSMITTALS NOT READILY RETRIEVABLE OC.3-1 LACK CF EMPHASIS OURING OESIGN REVIEWS CN ASSUMPTICNS, METHOOS ANC MEETING CESIGN CRITERIA OC.4-1 INSUFFICIENT EMPHASIS CN CONSTRUCTABILITY AND MAINTAINA8ILITY l
l3 O C.4-3 ENGINEERS PERMITTED TO WORK WIT'-!
!4 UNCCNTRCLLEO ORAWINGS
.E E
c I
I I
CESIGN CHANGE CONTRCL FINDING CESCRIPTICN CF GCCO PRACTICE O C.5-3 METHCO CF CHECXING FCR INTERFERENCE 5 !N THE DESIGN CHANGE PRCCESS IS VERY GCCO I
1 1
I i
~
I I
I I
E
. l 4
,r
_y_,,,,
4-%--,-
w-,---e--.-e.-e-y
.y--=*+---4 j - - -- - - - -- - - - --*
-es-m-F=^
e-
---+-w'---*
l1
~
l I
~
l OESIGN CHANGE CONTROL
_FINOING CESCRIPTION CF WEAKNESS I
f, OC.1-2 FIELO CHANGES NOT SEING ACEGUATELY REVIEWEO FCR ROOT CAUSES CF THE CHANGE OC.5-1 INCORPORATION OF REOLINES (A ORAWING CHANGE METHOO) NOT SEING HANOLEO IN A CONSISTANT MANNER OC.5-2 IDENTIFICATION CF CUTSTANOING REOLINES NOT l
IN THE PROJECT ORAWING STATUS REPCRTING SYSTEM PS.6-1 SOME STICK FILE 5 WERE FCUNO OUT-CF-CATE I
I l
1 1
1 siili g
6 I
I
' H CONSTRUCTICN ACTIVITIES - GENERAL FINOING DESCRIPTION CF GCCO PRACTICE CC.2-2 PRACTICES USED IN ECUIPMENT RIGC!NG WERE EXCEPTIONAL I
~
g CC.7 -1.
TEST EQUIPMENT FACILITY AND SYSTEM WERE g
EXCELLENT 25.1-2 GCCO SAFETY PRACTICES ARE SEING ENFORCED' I
PS.1-3 INSPECTICN CF RIGGING EGUIPMENT WAS EXTENSIVE I
PS.1-4 IMPLEMENTING A GCCO ECUIPMENT TAGGING PRCCRAM 4 -
l I
I I
I
1 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES - GENERAL l
FINDING CESCRIPTION Cr WEAKNESS 1-CC.2-1 SULK LAYCC1NN AREA WAS NOT ACECUATE CC.3-1 MAINTENANCE /INSPECTICN PROCEDURES CN INSTALLEO ECUIPMENT NOT SEING FCLLOWEO I
CC.3-2 E
INSTALLED ECUIPMENT SEING CEGRACED/
OAMAGEO i
PS.1-1 POTENTIAL FIRE DANGER RESULTING FRCM USE CF NCN-FIRE RETAROANT WCCO I
i i
l PS.1-5 AREAS WHERE CCNSTRUCTICN CONCESTICN PREVENTED SAFE REORESS I
I E
l t -
4 E
t
I CCNSTRUCTICN WORK INSTRUCTIONS j
i FINDING OESNTION CF WEAKNESS CC.1-2 I
INSUFFICIENT INPUT INTO CESIGN/CONSTRUCTICN PACKAGES RELATED TC INTERFERENCES, INSPEC-TICN ANO PROCECURES 1
CC.4-1 CRAFT'S WORK INSTRUCTICN PACKAGES HAVING INSUFFICIENT OR CONFLICTING INFCRMATICN I
CC.5-1 WORK INSTRUCTION PACKAGES LACKING CLEAR o
INSPECTION PRCCEDURES AND CRITERIA I
e GP.2-1 l
LACK CF STANDARDIZATICN IN QA/CC INTERPRE-TATICN CF INSPECTICN REQUIREMENTS I
l e
9
\\
l i
I
~
CRGANIZATION/AOMINISTRATION FINCING DESCRIPTION CF GCCO PRACTICE TN.1-1
. MANAGEMENT SUPPCRT CF TRAINING PROGRAMS WAS EXCEPTIONAL 1
.3 TC.3-1 A LARGE ANO EXPERIENCED STAFF IS SEING E
APPLIED IN THE TEST PRCCRAM PLAN CEVELOPMENT 1
I i
1 Li 1
I I
I sisii I
m
.~,-,,,r._.--_.
....e
CRGANIZATIONAL/ ADMINISTRATION FINCING.
CESCRIPTION OF WEAKNESS OA.1-1 RESPONSIBILITY CHAPTER IN PROJECT MAN NEEDS UPDATING OA.3-1 POSITION DESCRIPTIONS ARE NOT AVAILABL ALL MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL CC.1-1 INSUFFICIENT FIELO ENGINEERING SUPPORT GP.1-2 QA/GC ORGANIZATION CHART NOT UP-TO-OAT TN.2-1 ORGANIZATIONAL RESPCNSIBILITIES FOR QA TRAINING IS FRAGMENTED I
i j
QUALITY ACTIVITIES l
t FINDING CESCRIPTION OF WEAKNESS CA.2 -1 LACK CF PRCOUCTICN PERSONNEL INVOLVEMENT
.IN O!SPOSITIONING CCRRECTIVE ACTION GP.4-1 CURRENT METHCO FOR TRACKING CCRRECTIVE ACTION WAS NOT EFFECTIVE CP.4-2 SIGNIFICANT CONDITICNS ADVERSE TO QUALITY ARE NOT ALWAYS VISIBLE IN TRENO REPCRT e
e l
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING FINDING DESCRIPTION OF WEAKNESS
' CC.5-2 INSPECTION SCHECULING IS NOT CONSISTENTLY APPLIED PS.2-1 PLANNING / SCHEDULING PROCEDURES ARE NOT
~
CLEARC.Y DEFINED PS.2-2 PLANNING / SCHEDULING PROCESSES ARE NOT INTEGRATED PS.3-1 CURRENT MILESTCNE SCHEDULE CAN NOT SE ACHIEVED PS.3-1 FLOW OF PROJECT CONTRCL INFORMATICN IS NOT CLEARLY DEFINED GP.1-1 PLANNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND INSPECTION ACTIVITIES IS NOT A COM8INEO EFFORT i
TC.5-1 PREPARATICN CF WORKING LEVEL TEST PROCEDURES IS SEHINO SCHEDULE I
E3 TRAINING FTNOING CESCRIPTION CF GCCO PRACTICE TN.2-2 TRAINING PRCGRAM CEVELOPED JOINTLY SY BECHTEL AND CP CO WAS EXCELLENT TN.3-1 NEW HIRE ORIENTATION ANO TRAINING.WAS EXCEPTIONAL TN.4-1 TRAINING f*ACILITIES, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL WERE ABCVE AVERAGE e
9 O
9 e
---v
MAJOR STRENGTHS THE SPACE CONTROL PROGRAM FOR INTERFACE CHE e
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF DESIGN CHANGES IS EXCEL THE PROGRAM FOR SCHEDULING AND TRACKING TEST e
ACTIVITIES IS COMPREHENSIVE AND WELL STAFFE0.
-F e
1
MAJOR WEAKNESSES CONSIDERABLE EFFORT IS REQUIRED IN IDENTIFYING e
AND RETRIEVING DESIGN CRITERIA DOCUMENTATION, THERE HAS NOT BEEN SUFFICIENT CONSIDERATION GIV e
EN FOR CONSTRUCTABILITY, MAINTAINABILITY, AND INSPECTABILITY.
WORK INSTRUCTIONS TO THE FIELD ARE SOMETIMES e
INCOMPLETE AND CONFLICTING, CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA e
FOR ACCEPTANCE A$E NOT ALWAYS CLEARLY DEFINED, INADEQUATE PLANNING COORDINATION OF QA INSPECT e
WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, QA/QC REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCEFTABILITY ARE NOT CLE e
LY DEFINED AND DOCUMENTED, 4
UNITED STATES
[',
s.
I NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I
I WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 1
- Q)' ! -
DEC 2.152 MEMORANDUM FOR:
James G.- Keppler, Regional Administrator Reg _ ion III FROM:
Richard C. DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement
SUBJECT:
MIDLAND AND ZIMMER As a result of the recent EDO direction regarding more in-depth Program Office involvenent in significant problems associated with individual licensees, I have designated certain -individuals as responsible for representing IE and assuring that IE is appropriately involved in ongoing agency actions associated with the subject facilities. Mr. James Sniezek, Deputy Director, IE, should be kept informed of and involved in all deliberations and actions involving policy issues.
For the Division of Reactor Programs, Mr. James Stone, Chief, Construction Program, Section A, IE, should be kept informed and involved in all other deliberations and actions involving the subject facilities.
In-addition, Messrs. Sniezek and Stone should be on distribution for significant incoming and outgoing correspondence regarding the facilities.
Examples of such corresposidence are inspection reports, investigation reports, Confinnatory Action Letters, Congressional correspondence, and correspondence with interested parties.
They will ensure that requested IE comments on various documents and proposed actions are provided to the Region within the established time frame.
Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated.
./
9 g
itchardC.DeYoung,, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement cc:
W. J. Dircks, EDO H. R. Denton, NRR E. G. Case, NRR D. G. Eisenhut, NRR J. M. Taylor, IE E. L. Jordan, IE J. A. Axelrad, IE J. H. Sniezek, IE J. C. Stone, IE l
g e
- ' s: "
u D/7/gc.
4 I
V 4
PRESENTATION TO NRC CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM (CCP) e' 4
i f
I e
l
4
. 4 AGENDA INTRODUCTION EVALUATION CRITERIA BASIC PROGRAM DESCRIPTION DETAILED PLAN DISCUSSION PLAN RESPONSES TO CRITERIA-e 9
e 9
...,~,_...__....,.._-,.-7___,.
,_m,,._,
..,,_1,r._,._,,,,_,,
9 D
e
=
EVALUATION CRITERIA I
O e
6 6
e 5
EVAU!ATION CRITERIA TO REBUILD CONFIDENCE IN BECHTEL "Q* WORK THE PROGRAM MUST:
1.
PRING PLANT INSPECTION STATUS UP TO DATE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
2.
VERIFY THAT QUALITY ISSUES IN PAST WORK HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AND ARE BEING TRACKED.
3.
PROVIDE AN INSPECTION PROGRAM THAT CLOSELY TRACKS ALL FUTURE CONSTRUCTION ~.
u.
4.
INSURE THAT ANY NEW WORK DOES NOT COVER UP PAST PROBLEMS..
5.
INSURE THAT THE PLAN IS FULLY CONTROLLED BY CPCO'AND MONITORED BY KNOWLEDGEABLE PERSONNEL.
6.
IDENTIFY AND PRO IDE SUFFICIENT RESOURCES TO ACCOMPLISH THE PLAN.
7.
BE SPECIFIC ENOUGH FOR A SATISFACTORY MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING AMONG ALL PARTIES.
8.
RESOLVE OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS REGARDING QA PROGRAM.
9.
GIvE CONSIDERATION TO ORDERLY AND EFFICIENT CONDUCT OF THE f
PROJECT.
10.
PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY FOR PLAN ADJUSTMENT AS REQUIRED BASED ON INITIAL FINDINGS.
O O
,,-.,--,-------,.--,---,r-
-,-n-,,--.------,
0 0.
e e
O O
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM (CCP) 4 e
~
e S
8 e
. ~.., _ _ -
,n,_-~-.
.n,,,.,
THEME OF CCP
. IMPROVE PROJECT PERFORMANCE (FORWARD)
AND DETERMINE-THE STATUS OF THE PLAN'T (BACKWARD) 6 6
6 6
0 9
e e
A
9
' & _ c.
t 8
CCE REDUCE MANUAL MANPOWER ON THE PROJECT TO ACCOMPLISH THE FOLLOWING:
WORK NON-Q SYSTEMS TO COMPLETION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE PROVIDESTAFFINGTbWORKOFFTURNOVEREXCEPTIONSAND SUPPORT TEST ACTIVITIES ON TURNED-0VER SYSTEMS IMPLEMENT THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM (SEE NEXT PAGE)
COMPLETE ZACK ACTIVITIES COMPLETE B&W ACTIVITIES PERFORM REMEDIAL SOILS WORK CONTINUE WITH QA REINSPECTION CABLE HANGERS o
9 9
e
6 SPECIFIC BUILDING CCP A.
PREPARE THE BUILDING FOR REINSPECTION (COORDINATED WITHDRAWAL)
REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL ANE CLEAN ALL AREAS OF THE BUILDING.
AS WITHDRAWAL.IS MADE, PLACE SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT IN LAYUP (IEST ENGINEERS TO COORDINATE).
COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION NECESSARY TO LAYUP EQUIPMENT.
ALL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT REMOVED TO AN AREA FOR
' INSPECTION AND SCRAPPING AS NECESSARY.
B.
AS AREAS ARE CLEANED, ASSEMBLE SYSTEM TEAMS (SEE NEXT' SHEET)
AND PERFORM AN INSFECTION OF THE AUXILIARY BUILDING ON A SYSTEM-BY-SYSTEM' BASIS.
INCLUDE ENGINEERING WALKDOWNS I '
(SEISMIC II/I, PROXIMITY, ETC) AS PRACTICABLE.
C.
AFTER A REVIEW OF THE SYSTEM OPEN ITEMS, COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION ON A SYSTEM BASIS AND TURN OVER TO CPCO.
D.
AS THE AUXILIARY BUILDING PROGRAM DEVELOPS, NOVE INTO THE DIESEL BUILDING AND THE CONTAINMENTS.
SERVICE WATER PUMP STRUCTURE TO BE LAST DUE TO THE NUMBER OF SYSTEMS IN THAT BUILDING THAT HAVE BEEN THROUGH THE TURNOVER PROCESS.
4 e
9 p.
~., -. -.,
-,n.,
--n.
.. ~, -,
n,,.7,.-..,,,,., - - -,,, -, -r,,_,,-w..,..-r-m.,-m,,r,,-.,,--._,_
,.amy,,,n
_-a,- - -
rn-y-,,--
&w S
"o A
w a
a c
\\
l o
w 9
S A
o A
a p
~
3l i
l
)e M
l P
F' lh; 6
S "a
T t~
M i
e r
o i
e v a
m e
u
/
6 c
6i rs s
N :-
i n s i 1
\\
i-
- k I iI 6
.s 1
\\!'
S N
O b'
I TA A'
Z I
~
NAG R
O M
A E
I R-L A
e U
T 9
P E
C 9
NO C
L
~
'O
^
- E.
f DISTRIBUTION - NRC OPEN ITB!S LIST R.A. Wells M.L.Curland (4)
J.K.Meisenheimer H.P. Leonard L.E. Davis J.G.Gilmartin (4)
M.A.Dietrich E.C. Smith J.A.Rutgers J.W. Cook D.B. Miller (2)
B.H. Peck (6)
P. Corcoran D. Anderson-e 1/22/82
...,. 1 e
- The following coments are applicable to Revision 2, dated 11/22/82, of the NRC Open Items List:
- 1) The list has been updated and reflects activities which took place on Friday, November 19, 1982.
- 2) A new status column has been added to describe open/ closed status with the NRC and the Project.
-3)
Please contact me if you have any coments/ corrections to the list.
9 e H
G 9
de F
O O
e e
D
- 11/22/82 O
I-r A
b e
b e
m 8
U N
f>
N N
03 N
N Nm M
on
~
O em U
w o
_r5 Cf.
NRC OPEN ITEMS LIST 1.
'Ihe purpose of this list is to keep track of Construction related open items from NRC Inspections at the Midland Plant.
~2.
Guide to using the fom:
Item Number - each item / issue is numbered sequentially using the following key:
A - Administrative C - Civil E - Electrical M - Mechanical
...S..- Soils Date Initiated - enter:the date the item / issue is opened with the NRC.
Description.- enter a brief description oN the item / issue.
NRC Inspector - name of the NRC Inspector
~ Responsible Engineer - initials of the responsible Site !!anagement Organization (SMO) - Construction Department
. individual _using_the following key:
JGB - Balazer, JG_ (ext. _511)
BE - Evans, Et (ext. 417)
DDJ - Johnson, DD (ext. 422)
GBJ - Johnson, GB (ext. 468)
JSK - Kreple, JS (ext. 405)
GN.- Rxrray, GM (ext. 508)
BHP - Peck, BH (ext. 400)
DWP - Puhalla, Di (ext. 408)
GWR - Rowe, GW (ext. 414)
DES - Sibbald, DE (ext. 418)
TAS - Spelman, TA (ext. 415)
~
IUV - Vokal, IU (ext. 404)
MM - Wheeler, Et (ext. 416)
RHW - Wieland, RH (ext. 408)
__ 16D W M M- ---- -----
Action - briefly describe action planned or being taken.
~
Due Date - enter a response / item closecut date, where applicable.
hE Status - enter the status of the item as far as the NRC is concerned.
OPEN - The hE is awaiting acticn or information from us.,.
CLOSED - No other action is required.
Project Status - enter the status of the item as far as we are concerned.
OPEN - We owe the NRC some action or information, or we have a document needing closure (FCR, NCR, etc.)
CI4 SED - No other action is required.
4
+4 9
9 BHPeck 11/22/82 9
9 e
e G
9 0
t I2 ds
/
ea f1 ep c1 r
N rS a.
1 a iU
- ss t
WA 1
e' ea nrN gd RT dI PS edP ap PU lO aI SU CI RK NrS E
ET UR II g
r s
n uo s
i ot ek u
rr s
onedo r
t oWdw u
i a
p dt t
oc. s eu el mt eei roe rt g sl d r al aeb eodm N
roec a
s rn ol O
ae p
ot r IT hr lt u
u sl eC C
Ct 1 i wn A
Tu t oo I
1 bf0 shdM PG SN P
EE I
R N
I f
r CP e
RS n
NN d
I ra G
s
'N I
P I
e h
N t
O I
n T
o P
I s
R n
C om S
ia E
t r D
sg ie e
r Q l' 4
i u
28 l
/9 TI 1
/
I I
0 N
1 I
f 1
M
-A I
T
ITM 8 iWTE DESCRIFFION NRC RESP.
ACTION IDE NRC PROJECT INITIATED INSP.
ENG.
IRTE STKlUS STATUS C-1 10/22/82 lbnorail over Diesel Gener-landsman JSK
%e status of this Closed ator (Dwg. C-1009 welds not item is being tracked per drawing, under M-19B.
I C-2 10/22/82 Stmctural Steel - vendor Landsman Dill 1his item was origin-1/83 Open - Need t welds.
ally found by us - not close out SCI-NRC.
Issue will re-main open until closed out mer schedule prep.
and ay Bechtel.
C-23 11/10/82 Ilote in concrete filled Bruce TAS
'Ihe following inform-Closed block wall at elevation Burgess ation transmitted to 645', west side, into B. Burgess on 11/10/82.
degassifier room. Ilole A) Spec. 7220-C-231Q was for shielding IIVAC duct, Rev 22. See 9.2.2 AGB.
B) Dwg. 7220 C-1194Q Rev 2 Page 2 of 17 Update 11/22
.(--.
RESP.h
~
1M f INie:'
E1FSrRIFf15 K
ACflW IN E
6 INITIATED INSP.
M.
INIE STAMIS STAllIS 3
10/22/82 FSK procedure requires ref-tandsman l#fP
-Issu2d NCR-M-01-9-2-l'5 i OPIM - Need I
- v. 2 erence to design drawing.
-Eng. Eval. need for expand scope FSK-CY-1935 does not.conply.
ESK/ design dwg. cross Also, MtC wants design dwg.
reference.
to reference assoc. FSK's.
FE Review FSK is for i
similar problems.
-1 10/22/82 he design drawing C-1004 landsman 3M' For beam connectors Closed
- v. I does not show detail for dwg. C-147 allows fieI< f beam connections.
to detail-dug. C-147 provides criteria for welds not shown on C-1004. No other act-ion required. Contact Steve Harvey.
10/22/82 FSK should designate if 'V'. landsman gg.
NCR-N-01-9-2-155 is-Open - Need t sued.
expand scope.
FE to review FSK's for similar problems.
10/22/82 (Superceded by C-4) i See C-4 10/22/82 D/G Bldg. - span change for landsman ilMP Span is o.k.
Inspec-Closed fan support not per drawing.
tor misread drawing.
j No other action re-quired. Contact Steve learvey.
l 10/22/82 Size of knife blade not landsman IIIIP
-Detail for bracing to Closed specified.
be clarified (FCRC-5174) copy to MIC 11/2- /82
-NCR-M-01-9-2-155 is-sued.
-Field to review con-trol of detailing.
'~
hth ${fN/
IM 8 IKsc#
IIRemIpTMBI IK RESP.
ACTIGI IRE IK sW1pILT IRTE STAllIS STA115; INITIATIB INSP.
- lys, 9
10/22/82 thylicate QCIR's for dry landsman IEF IIere not duplicates Closed
]
pack - same as IPIN problem.
Best-were revisions..
Nu otteer action re-quired.
13 ' 10/22/82 pt IUt fer a fu support.
landsman ISE' Iksplicate IER reretir-Open Ca=AY ed. Original could
.Auditi not be found. Ido othe-action required. Con-
- IDb, tact J. Ihavis.
11 10/22/82 Iletired IUt - should be an-lasedsman ISE' Procedure changed to Open - Reviet notated on current drauing.
require retired ICR/
Retrofitting 10s annotation.
12 11/5/82 11ee A-572 beams used in Lasuh===
ISA' Ineview QCIR for attri-11/8 Closed Reactor Bldg. - How does QC bute. Contact Steve verify they are in fact A-Harvey/Ed Ikstton.
572 beasms?
13 11/5/82 Prior to 1979 idest was the Landsman IndP pelC give. copies of-11/8 Open - Write; esterial control to keep all old procedures
~
Q and nose-Q steel segregated F prior to 1979.
~
up on other sites.
14 11/5/82 fletail 3 on dug. C-1004 shoes standsman IMP
-NCR wiritten on plates 11/8 Operi - Need l" angle and 5/16" plate -
-FE to rework under-Chronology field measurements indicate sized plates.
for 100 and '
Engineering '
saml1 plates.
disposition q summiler plats
~
15 11/5/82 Provide ISIC with QCIR for landsuman IRIP Infonmation available 11/8
' Open - Perfo:
structural steel for still for ISIC Ineview.
Inspection framing for secosed floor of' I
}-
IVG Bldg. - Also any OftR's for framing steel.
~.
Page 4 of 17 I
~
t4xiste 11/22/E,
IIM f MT:
11ESCRIPTI(W NRC RESP.
ACTION IllE f5tC heatlECT INITIATFD INSP.
ING.
MTE STAlllS STAltlS t
! :- l'a 11/10/82 FSK procedure does not allom Landsmar f1NP KR initiated to clar-Closed j
field to do design.
Be-ify detailing vs.
l cause connections are de-d,esign. Cave FCR to i
signed by Field, the pro-the MtC on 11/22/82.
cedure is violated.
l :-17 11/10/82 Material in 'iydown area doe s Several trips to lay-Closed.
not seem to w segregated ostan1==
IlWP down area with Mtc l
marked per Field Procedure.
with no open items identified.
l ll-18 11/10/82 tb the 1" plates and L's on landsman 18fr Plates meet ASIM-A-6 Closed -
l fan support meet tolerances L's not to be checked Reviewed FER l
for ASIM A-67 per MIC
' :-13 11/10/82 Somn connection in llVAC fan landsman 11NP NCR written to cover Open - DeveR supgert was bolted while Bay 3 dwg. called for welded.
dwg./QC sign sequence.
- -20 11/10/82 Address why QCIR for fan Landsman llWP QMt written to address Ogen -ht.
support steel is closed yet concern.
simuld QCIR as-built is not per draw-address.
ing.
i :-21 11/10/82 Revision 6 of dwg. C-1004 landsman 18dP Correct drawing revis-Closed l
incorporated IO8-C-335 yet ion block.
the revision block did not Contact D. Anderson /
rete this.
R1Akers
- -22 10/28/82 Osipping of concrete on CB Barrett IMI Refer to NCR M-1-9 Open - Need -
fI exterior well at el. 680'.
154. Additional in-close out NC
~
fonmation provided to Corrective Mr. Barrett on 11/18/
action should 82.
address gene concerns.
Page 5 of IB Ipdate11/28 l
g-5f!N f IRTE DESCRIlfrION NRC ltESP.
ACr10N 1110 NRC PRWLUf INITIATED INSP.
ENG.
y IMTE srA W S STAWS ~
<j
- ' R-1 f,
- 1(&,'14/82 Generator Control Panel Gardner GWR FCR H-6655 written on 11/26
'Open-need Y
1C-231 anchor bolts not 9/21/82 (lost) re-close out of
-.., f
"/.f.
~
'not installed according to written on 10/14/82 FCR.
~ ']
vendor drawing..
, requesting alternate anchoring detail.
4 11-2 10/14/82 Internal wiring separation Gardner GWR This problem identi-11/30 Open-need d is inadequate-Panel IC-232.
fled on CPCo NCR-075
~ close out W (RET-Delta is supplier of in June 1981..
l 231 and 232 panels to RTU-Dalta on site (MpqAD) i Delaval) 11/16/82.
Barriers f, boxes to be added via 3
DCP.
M 1here still are open items that RTE has not i
addressed relative to this NCR.
i s
~
i g li-3 10/14/82 Foundation bolts for Pane'l Gardner GWR Traceability found and 10/22 Closed 1
1C-111 have no traceability shown to Mr. Gardner.
1 li-3b -
10/14/82 Anchor bolt washers missing Gardner GWR Insufficient flat 11/30 Open-need and cannot verify Bevel washers on site to
. close out F+
washers are there.
complete work.
FMR-EY9382 to Procure-i ment 11/11/82 ETA-11/22/82 l
FCR M-7026 written i
11/10/82 to request i
option of using Bevel washers or not.
FCI(
4 due 11/22/82 for dis-j gmsition.
Page 6 of 17 j
Update 11/22
4 IM f IMTE DESCRIlffl0N '
NRC RESP.
ACTION IXfD NRC PIKUECT INITIATED INSP.
IM;.
IRTE STAWS STAWS
-4 10/14/82 Defective shop teminations Gardner GMt DeLaval Rep to be 11/30
'Open-Need to-in Panel IC-111.
requested to make site close out SCI visit to assess defec-Live' terminations.
SCRE #64 response due 11/22/82.
-5 10/14/82 General concem on channel Gardner GMt QAR F-191 written on 12/15 Open-Need tc.
separation of wiring.
8/2/82, response was revise docu-t throughout the plant.
to revise E-47 fi E-42 ments.
~
and modify PQCI E 3.0.
Resident Ihgineering to issue clarification DCN by 11/24/82 which supplies all i
criteria for inspec-tion.
Field Engineering to prepare FIE 4.200 to give inspection criteria'by 12/16/82
'-6 10/27/82 Mr. Barrett found cable Barrett GMt Background infomation 11/30
.Open-Need traveling across the tray is contained on 11/1 procedural barrier and then back.
and.11/10/82 updates.
revisions.
FPE 4.000 is being l
revised - due IJ/22/82 FPE will give tie l
down requirements for j
horizontal trays, 1
criteria for fill above barrier and will be a retrofit.
j Appropriate IV'I's will be revised upon Page 7 of 17 issuance of FPU 4.000.
tipdate 11/22/f I
Preliminary copy of l
FPE 4.000 sent to Mr.
Barrett on 11/19/82.
3
flM f IMTE DESCRIlffION NRL RESP.
ACfl0N
' 1XHI NRC f>ilWBCf INITIATED INSP.
ING.
' JMTil SrA1US.
STA1US I
li-7 10/19/82 Dimensions on Drawing E-796 Gardner GWR FCN's.7040 and 8536 11/18 Closed do.not agree with as-built DW #16 to E-796 conditions, written and approved.
Copies given to R. Gardner on 11/10/82
- li-8 10/19/82 Pull boxes for conduits Ganiner GWR Background infonnation 11/19 Closed 2BN004 and 2BN007 in Bay 4 is contained on up-of the D/G Bldg. appear to date of 11/10/82.
be taxlersizbd according to FCR E-3157 was approv-i E-42 Sil 42.
ed on 11/17/82 and a copy sent to Mr'.
Gardner on 11/19/82.
i 11-9 11/2/82 Traceability of base plate Ganiner GWR According to E-42 11/18 Open Becht<
mterial.
SII 100 misc. steel is to review l
purchased to C-233Q.
. closure of C-233Q is a fabrica-C-233, App.
j tion specification.
i Bulk material is pur-chased to G-33Q and approval to purchase i
l bulk materials against l
G-33Q is granted in i
C-233Q.
l li-10
-11/2/82 Mr. Gardner requested Gardner GWR Gave Mr. Gardner copy 11/5 Closed i
approved methods of tray
'of Ilusky-Btmidy hold attaciunents to supports.
down clip detail, l
specification for hold-down criteria (E-42 sh 8A, Sh 64 6 Sh 64A). Welding details being utnerote are specified in E-42.
I I
Gave Mr. Ganiner Page 8 of 17 t
l l
SIRX'-A hold down clip, M ate 11/22 i
l copy of non Q G Q P.O. 's
i
'IM f IRTm DESCRIPTION NRC RESP.
ACTION
. IDE NRC NdUfff INITIKTED INSP.
ENG.
IMTE STA1US STATUS 1-1 10/14/82 Exhaust system hangers in I,andsman JSK llanger drawings have.
Closed Diesel Generator Building.
Corcoran been revised Q.
MiyAD Why is this hanger non-Q.
1.cwis hps written an NCR Ballweg
(#M01-5-2-166) 1-2 10/19/82
' Strut Support not welded Landsman JSK lianger Constniction Closed 4
according to drawing Marl not complete.
652-1-510.
i 1-3 10/19/82 Strut support not welded according to dwg. 652-1-510 Landsman JSK llanger Construction Closed Marl not complete.
t i l-4 10/19/82 Item #1 Bill of Material Landsman JSK llanger Dwg. redlined i n Closed not according dwg. "10x8" Marl Standish Fab Shop due 1
tube steel replaced by "10 to lack of material.
i x10" and not called out on Redline not included work print 652-1-510.
in work print.
i I-5 10/19/82 No preheat done to struc-Landsman JSK PQC1 CW 1.00 does not Closed i
tural steel in Diesel Sprague require verification l
Generator Building prior
'redianelli for preheat less than i
to welding of exhaust sys-Ilarrison 70'F.
NRC position is
((
tem hangers. 11652 sh 1.
that verification of all temperatures should i
be required.
BPCo has written FCR C 5150 to have welding spec changed to reflect pre qualified AWS spec 1976 Telecon to Paul Barrett 11/18/82 to j
discuss following PQCI s:
1 P-2.10, PW-1.00, E-2.1 E-1.0, FPW-4.000, CW-Page 9 of 17 l
1.00, W-1.60 UPDATE-11/22/1-J 4
' 1-6 10/19/82 Field Welding Engineer does Landsman JSK NRC observation that Closed j
not keep records of non-Q non-Q field welding,
j inspections or what to im-records are not readily pact.
accessible.
.IM 8 DATir DESCRIlffl0N -
~ NRC RESP,_
ACTION IME NRC he.NrfT INITIATED INSP.
ENG.
DATil STKlUS STATUS 1-7 10/20/82' Qnestions concerning large I.andsman JSK 18nn 84 civil as called Closed bore hangers in D/G H1dg.
out in weld spec. G-1.
Where is weld rod type 27.
i specified for stiffener plate welding symbol.
, 1-8 10/20/82
'2. Diesel Exhaust snubber Landsman JSK Assembly furnished by Closed-1-652-1-19 No stanchion 11T Grinnell, no weld-to plate welding symbol.
ing required at goint in question.
! i-9 10/20/82 3
Upper llangers on Diesel Landsman JSK P129 forms have not yel
. Closed i
Exhaust system. llave they Marl been filled out by FE's been inspected by QC.
llangers not released j
to QC.
l-10 10/20/82 4.
Stiffener Plates Welded Landsman JSK Technically acceptable-Closed to Structural above hanger Corcoran obstruction would not in question welded on one allow welding to both i
side only, is this good sides.
Eng'g practice 7 i
- 1-11 10/20/82 Qnestions concerning large Landsman JSK FCR 6925 written to 11/4 Closed bore hangers in Diesel Gen-Marl cover installation.
l crator Bldg.
Is there a redline for snubber 1-652-l 1-19 showing weld to imbed 1
i in bay 2.
Similar situatio i i
in Bay 1.
i j st-12 10/20/82 Bay 2 left side beam attach 1,amisman JSK.
Weld is okay, at least 11/4 Closed i
ment for spring hanger, al-Sprague 7/16".
f though weld-there is a gap l
between two welded pieces is this acceptabic redline Page 10 c 17' to 1-652-1-501.
UPDATE - 11/2 t
e GI f DAT V DESCRIlrfl0N.
NHC RESP.
ACriON 11111 NRC hGIECT INITIATED INSP.
ENG.
DATI!
ST,YIllS STATUS
-13 10/19/82 Number on hanger FSK is not I.andsman JSK M652 Sh.1 Rev. 9 F1 11/4 Closed the same as utenber on ISO Marl corrected problem.
that references detail no.
(
(1-652-1-19) US.
2-652 l 19.
l i
-14.
10/19/82 Procedure for the time limi 1,andsman JSK IIPCo internal memo 11/4 Closed on forwarding SPEC changes JDavis directing FE that two from Ann Arbor.
Gilmartin days will be allowed for tech. review prier j
to distribution, i
! -15 10/19/82 Painting requirements for Barr6tt JSK BPCo has determined 11/9 Closed j-welds.
Painting inside Riat that based on metallur-cont. is Q.
Painting out-Corcoran gical review of the side is non-Q.
Is paint-problem that painting ing of Q welds required to is not required to maintain the integrity of maintain integrity of the weld.
the weld.
(Need to confirm this with flarrett).
j -16 10/28/82 Control of distribution of Barrett JSK IIPCo has developed flos 11/22 Open redline changes should go Gilmartin charts of the. existing l
through Document Control JDavis and proposed methods 1
not Field Engineering as of handling drawing is presently done.
changes to route throut h
}
D/C.
Copy of flow charts forwarded to NR(
1
~
-17 10/28/82 Is there a program to con-Ilarrett JSK
!!PCo presently has sev-11/15 Closed trol removal of temporary Cook Pulito eral methods of con-hangers?
trolling temporary.
- i They include
- 1. System 14mchlist
- 2. System Walkdown Page 11 of 17 l
- 3. Ilanger Walkdown
- 4. PSDIV Section 5.8.1 UPDATE-11/22/8 i
This program will be explained to ItCook N!!C.
L
71)I I 1RTr.
DESCitIlvfl0N NitC
. R SP.
ACTION.
IXJE NRC 1*all!CT INITIATED
'INSP.
- ling, JMTII STATUS -
STA1US.
1-18 10/28/82 Material traceability prob-Barrett-JSK Thlecon to Barrett.11-Open lem. Material purchased Corcoran. 18-82 did not resolve from non-approved vendor.
Marl concern. Additional (NCR3266)
McClure infomation is being Anderson gathered by IMnderson.
i Detrich l
t-19 A 10/22/82 Monorail over diesel gener-landsman JSK MPQAD has written a QAI.
Open ator.
Why is this Non-Q?
Corcoran
(#F228).
Calculations Anderson to show siesmic analy-Senn sis has.been perfomed have been reviewed by
}
NRC.
2 ov.cr 1 generic
{
issue.
1-19 H 10/22/82 Monorail over diesel gener-landsman JSK Welds confom with sym-Open ator. Welds do not con-Corcoran bols on dwg. however, form with what's on dwg.
Anderson interpretation of weld i
C-1009 (1his item was C-1).
senn symbols pertaining to 3
the extent of weld must be clarified for the g
NRC.
- l-20 A 11/10/82
'Ihe diesel engineer exhaust Burgess JSK Vendor dwgs. M-18-357-Closed l
silencer is designed to mov a Kilizzek 1 and M-18-358-2 shows j
horizontally on 2,1/8" stai i-Marl flourocarbon bearing i
less bearing plates.
4,1/1 I
plate detail.
1 bearing plates have been in i
stalled.
i 1-20 B 11/10/82 Will dirt between the plate : Burgess JSK 5 of 16 flourogold beai Closed j
hinder the movement.
ing plates are suffi-cently warped to allow inclusion of dirt. Top j
flourogold plate is larger than the bottom Page 12 of 17 j
to preclude the in-UPIWTE-11/22/3-clusion of dirt.
BPCo j
will develop a program j
to blow out.before T/O.
j (cont imw.11 l
'IN I DKin DESCRIlrfl0N NRC HESP.
ACTION 1110 NRC adUECT INITIATED INSP..
ENG.
IMTE STA1US STA1US 1-20 B Vendor brochure FC-5015-3 states that
{ continued) plates should be pro-tected from contamina-tion.
1-21 A 11/10/82 Support bearing plates in Burgess JSK FCR 7047 written to Open Bay 1 are not larRe enough Kiliszek cover stitch welds.
to be welded to exhaust Marl All plates are' welded silencer support.
Dwg per dwg.
7220-M18-250-5 calls for bearing plates to be weld-ed.
i l-21 B 11/10/82 Miy are there slots in the Burgess JSK Dwg.'M-18-425-4 shows Open*
center support en the si-Kiliszek detail and notes to en-lencer in Bay 4.
Marl large center holes in field to clear anchor j
bolts where necessary.
i
! l-22 A.11/10/82 Exhaust silencer has cal-Burgess JSK NCR 4693 has been writ.
Open
~
4 culated horizontal growtli Kiliszek ten to rework plates.
j of.532" per dwg. M-18-250-Marl Slots were torch cut 5.
'lhe slots in the bear-and not machined to i
ing supports are not uni-dimensiens shown on dw; fom in all bays and may not allow predicted thermal j
expansion.
i l l-22 B 11/10/82 Miy didn't the QC receipt Burgess JSK Receipt Inspection Pro Open inspection program catch Kiliszek gram was not required j
the slot problem.
Marl.
to inspect to that de-l tail.
l I-23 A 11/10/82 Center support beneath ex-Burgess JSK Silencer was installed Open haust silencer in Bay 1 is Kiliszek prior to exhaust pipes.
i not grouted completely and Marl
! Pipes were then fitted Page 13 of 17
{
may put additional load on Anderson to silencer from enginc UPlWTE - 11/2e, exhaust nines.
i.
'IM f IMTir' IESCRIlffl0N NRC-RESP. '
ACTION IXJU NRC bdl)ECf INITIATliD INSP.-
ENG.
IMTE STA1US STATUS 1-23 B 11/10/82 Miat does the lack of grout llurgess JSK Calculations done by Closed in center support do to Kiliszek BPCo field eng'g show harm the outside flourocar-Marl 1 pad to be about 31 PS' bon bearing support plates.
Brochure for flourogolt flow much weight can they bearing plates show
, stand.
that they can withstand 500PSlat 400*F.
1-23.C 11/10/82 Vendor dwg M-18-250-6 show Burgess-JSK NCR 4694 has been writ-Open jacking plates to be in -
Kiliszek ten against installation bedded in concrete beneath Marl of jacking plates. No1 support jacking screws, all plates are missing.
~
Mmt effect does jacking D. Anderson is doing
~
screws have on bare concret concrete cales.
Show calculations to prove concrete strength was ade-quate to support jacking wi Lh out failure.
(1-24 11/10/82 Center silencer support Burgess JSK Extra nuts have been Closeil drawing M-8-250-5 shows tha :
Killszek
- removed, anchor bolts have one nut Marl while there are actually tw i
units installed in field.
Al-25 11/10/82 M-18-250-5 notes that sup-Eurgess JSK Set screws have been Closed port plate set screws shoul I Kiliszek removed.
be removed after grouting Marl and they heve not been.
it-26 11/10/82 Starting air lines in Bay Barret JSK Starting air lines were Closed 2.
What year of the ASMli IMnderson supplied by Grinnell.
code are these lines con-Table 3. 2.4 of the structed to? What year of FSAR states that " shop the ASMli code are these lin 3s fabricated piping 21,,
Page 14 of.17 examined to?
and larger is designed UPIRTE-11/22/
to the 1981 ASMli code stenmer '73 addendum.
(continued)
O
!LN f IMTh DESCRIlvfl0N NRC RESP.
ACTION
- 1X10 NRC Iduirr INITIATED INSP..
ENG.
IMTE STA1US' STA1US
-26 Table 3.2-3 of the FSAl states that the liner-
! continued) gency Diesel generator:
(supplied by Delaval-are designed 1974 ASME code, steuner '76 adden-dten.
i
'Ihe 1981 code states that section III pip-l ing 4" and less does t
, not require NDE nore i stringent than visual.
~
l lhe 1974 code changes the size to 2" and less.
,I QAR F-222 has been
' written by MPQAD.
i i
i 1
i Page 15 of 17 1
UPIMTE-11/22/8; 4
i t
[131 3 DATE Dl!SCRIPTION NRC RiiSP.
ACTION DUE NRC PHQJECT INITIATED INSP.
ENG.
DATil STA1US STATUS S-1 8/9/82 Develop Procedure For Gardner Gl4 Ready to close.
11/5 Closed Construction Coordination Resolve with Gardners 1orms.
next visit.
3-2 7/15/82 Provide NRC with our pro-Gardner DES SWP Procedure issued-11/11 Open cedures to drill with Fbre-trench procedure Revert.
needs revision.
4-3 9/22/82 BWST Crack Grouting landsman IMP Review FIPQAD Closed - Sent item of response to N Nonconpli-ance.
1-4 9/22/82 Slope layback 1.andsman GM Review FHyAD response Closed - Sent Item of response to N Noncoupli-ance.
- - 5 9/22/82 Petcock location Landsman DES Review ifQAD response Closed - Sent item of response to N Nonconpli-
- ance, i-6 9/24/82 Why is EPA moving up?
Landsman GN Prepare response 1y 11/5 Open Resolve question with 11/1/82
- 11. Landsman, i-7 10/22/82 Tenporary underp' inning Landsman DES Addressed w/NRC on 11/11 Open beneath T.B. "Q.
Define 11/4/82 Work to be on C-45.
board order plus MINAl
~
1 li 2.
i-8; 10/22/82 Haffle T Perimeter Dike Q?
I.andsman EllW Same as S-7 11/11 Open i
Page 16 of 17 I
HPnATP-11/77/;
e
f 7 /
1 2 2,
f /
o 1
1 T
LS 7
1 E DV n
T J
lA e
e A MT p
g D tS O
a P P U SU
'C 1 RA NTS E
5 BT
/
UM 1
DJ 1
-re t
te l
dpnu eswo ol tl N
o O
yf I
e T
nd C
oe A
oe Nn O
PG e
SN M
EI U
R I
na CP m
RS s
NN d
I n
a.
1 5
4
-C no N
C "Q O
RN" If r
r oo I
I tf RC rw S
ee L
ti D
t v ee l r D
2 E
8
'T
/
A 2
hT I
2/
I 0
t
~
N 1
I I
9 N
4
- iI;!
- ii t
ii
- l l1iiI 1!
4 j
- ,jI l1
56CQ Vt.12TH PLACE
- CHICAGO iCICERO)ILL 60650
- 312/242 3434
[)'~
4401 WESTERN
- FLINT MICHIGAN 48S06
- 313/730 2o40
,r m%
the @@Cdco.'
CUSTOM METAL FABRICATION
-w November 30, 1982
- 7220-M-151-Zs-754 Bechtel Power Corporation P.O. Box 2167 CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY Midland, M1. 48640 l
Attn:
Mr. L.E. Davis, Site Manager 83 3 '-
DEC 011982
Subject:
Safety Related Wel' ding MPQAD HVAC QA Gentlemen:
During the past few weeks an extensive effort has been expended by the Bechtel Corporation, Consumers Power Co. and the Zack Company to evaluate the Photon Audit Findings and determine its impact on the Midland Pro-ject HVAC installation.
As a result of these efforts and the discussions held November 29, 1982 (see minutes attached) the following actions have been initiated by the Zack Co.
- Effective 3: 00 a.m., Tuesday Nove=ber 30, 1982 1.
The Zack Co. has discontinued all safety related welding.
2.
The Zack Co. has discontinued the Qualifi-cation of new welders.
3 The Zack Co. has withdrawn all safety-re-lated weld procedures.
- Effective Tuesday, November 30, 1982 a total of 151 craft were laid off from ist and 2nd shift.
- A recovery plan has been initiated and will be presented to Bechtel by December 10, 1982 (see attached outline).
The above actions were taken by the Zack Company in conjunction with MPQAD and Bechtel Corporation to con-tinue to promote the need for unquestionable quality on the Midland Project above existing commitments to project schedules and completion ~ objectives.
. FOUNDED TO SOLVE THE UNICUE METAL FABRICATION NEEDS OF INDUSTRY *
- DEDICATED TO CLEANING AND CUSTOMlZlNG THE AIR OF THE WORLD *
- 7220-M-151-Ze-754 Page 2 4
The Zack Company will work with Bechtel Corporation to redevelop and reestablish a project schedule based upon successful resolution of the welding problems.
Should you have any problems or questions concerning the above please do not hesitate to contact the under-signed.
Very truly yours, mfd R
David E. Calkins Project Manager DEC/ps cc:
C.Z. DeZutel D.R. Mal ahn E.J. Riley R.B. McCarley D.W. Graf J.G. Balazer gFiler '- Midland Files - Chicago MPQAD - H. Leonard e
o P
G A
MEETING MINUTES Y
SUBJECT:
MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER - HVAC SUBCONTRACT 7220-M151, AUDIT OF PHOTON TESTING, INC.
The purpose of this letter is to document the agreeme.ts reached
~\\
in the Bechtel, Zack, CPCo meetings held on Novembe
- , 1982 f*
LLj?b"
.regarding the subject audit.
jf I
s MPQAD conducted an audit of Photon Testing, Inc. during the period September 14 through September 16, 1982.
Audit report M01-336-2 was issued' October 14, 1982.
The audit report included 11 find-ings and 2 observations.
As a result of a Bechtel, Zack, CPCo meeting held on November 3, 1982, it was agr.eed that MPQAD would review the audit report to assure the issues are properly defined.
This was to be completed November 19,, 1982.
It was also agreed that welder certifications would continue to be acceptable until this review provided objective evidence to the contrary.
A further conclusion at that time was that the audit results might be caused for challenging the qualification of Zack welding procedures, and that, again, based on the resuits of the MPQAD review, it may be necessary to reverify the procedures.
The MPQAD review of the audit results was completed November 19, 1982.
Subsequently, several Bechtel, Zack and CPCo meeti.gs have occurred to analyze the results.
The following conclusions have'been reached:
Page 2 1)
Although needing to be restated for clarity, the original audit. findings are to remain.
The audit'concl'uded that Photon is not implementing a quality assurance program, and this is a unsatisfactory condition and that Photon should be removed as an approved vendor.
The fundamental issue is that the applicable programmatic requirements of ANSI N45.2 were not invoked upon Photon, and those require-ments which were invoked were not implemented properly by
~
Photon.
Accordingly, insufficient assurance exists that procedure qualification and welder certification were done in accordance with the project programmatic requirements.
2)
The audit results do contain sufficient cause for challenging both the qualification of Zack welding pr.ocedures and the certifications of Zack welders.
As.a r'esult of the above conclusion, Bechtel, Zack and CPCo have voluntarily agreed upon the following course of action:
1)
Zack will develop a new procedure for the qualification of weld procedures and the certification of welders.
This new procedure will address all the applicable programmatic requirements of ANSI N45.2 and Bechtel Specification 7220-G-23 2)
Zack will discontinue certifications of new welders to existing procedures effective.:00 am, Tueday, November 3
30, 1982.
3)
Zack, Bechtel and CPCo will participate in a task team effort to write new weld,ing procedures.
Zack wi11 qualify these c.
procedures in accordance with the programmatic requirements defined in item 1 above.
i
~
l Page 3 9-4)
Zack will recertify all existing welders and' certify new welders for safety related work in accordance with the pro-cedure-developed in item 1.and item 3 above.
5)
Effective 3: 00 am, Tuesday, November 30, 1982, Zack will discontinue all safety related welding.
When items 1 and 3 above are completed and as individual welders are certified and recertified, those welders may resume welding safety
.related work.
6)
Bechtel Project Engineering will evaluate the Zack Company technical justification of existing work to determine whether
'the programmatic failures have resulted in any actual loss of' integrity to the welding.
Bechtel Project Engineering will advise MPQAD as to whether any situation exists which may be reportable under 10CFP.50.55(e) 7 )' MPQAD will revise audit report M01-336-2 and the associated findings and observations and reissue.
8)
MPQAD,-Zack and Bechtel recognize the project commitment to quality takes precedence over the project schedule.
9)
Zack Company will prepare an outline of a recovery plan by 12/3/82 and will develop complete plan by 12/10/82.
8 9
e
o a
OUTLINE OF RECOVERY PLAN / OPERATING PLA 1.
Establish a weld task team to develop, rev new weld procedures.
a) task team to consist of (5) Zack perso:
(1) BPCo M & Q (2) BPCo Res.
(2) CPCo Qualit initial meeting scheduled Wednesday 12,:
b) task team to:
(R. Harris Zack Co. to t 1.
Identify required procedures ar.
BPCo/Zack Weld Matrix - write a cedures.
2.
Establish prequalified PQR's.
3.
Establish schedule for balance qualified (est. 4 - 6 weeks).
4 Establish schedule for qualifier (est. 6 - 8 weeks after PQR qua:
5.
Provide supervision, direction a of weld procedure qualification:
qualifications.
-2.
Establish new 6 week schedule utilizing avai' related work and non-welding safety related ment installation).
3.
Assign Field Engineers.and Foreman to task t statusing on safety related systems.
a)
Action items:
1.
Assign G. Gavits Team Leader.
2.
Walkdown all safety related systems.
-develop worklist/punchlist'- status
-identify all open RFI's - define nee:
status and construction impact.
-identify all open NCR's - define sta~
struction impact.
-w'ork with MPQAD to define "Q" status-above.
3.
Work with MPQAD to complete backlog c:
inspections.
4 Scheduling department - action items:
a) l Intergrate statusing information from walk scheduling mapper program n
-r--
-e-
+<--
e y
e-ex-w wi-
-y.-
r--wr-e,
_-y c
e w--+,---c
- - =, - -,---=
+-
-w.
---=.,e-
+ -,, - -
Page 2 update to latest information
-. complete programming and computer loading.
b)
Maintain slow down scheduling on 6 week schedule basis only
-c)
Evaluate impacts to project schedule d)
Project recovery-plans
- estimate completion of weld problem 3 months.
- using existing man loading as of 11/29/82.
- using new demand schedule. completion October 1982.
- using first shift only full capacity.
5.
Detailing:
action items.
a)
Establish back log
- develop recovery schedule.
- evaluate night shift (supervison requirements).
- address needs for non-safety work.
O 9
1
. = -,;.
~.
j p.'
James W cook L
%\\,.
Vice Pressdent - Projects. Engsneersng end Constr=ctson
.. General Offices: 1945 West Pernest Acad. Jacaraon. MI 49201 + (517) 788 0453 December 6,1982 James G'Keppler Regional Administrator US Nuclear Regulatory Comisssion Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT -
SOILS
. START CONSTRUCTION OF PIER 12 -
FILE 0485.16 SERIAL 20262 REFERENCE 1)
J W COOK LETTER OF SEPTEMBER 17, 1982 TO H R DENTON AND J G KEPPLER, SERIAL 18845-2)
D B MILLER LETTER OF NOVEMBER 24, 1982 TO W D SHAFER, SERIAL CSC-6437 REGION III This letter responds to recent discussions with Region III. regarding the resumption of construction of the soils remedial project, specifically piers 12 East and 12 West, and documents Consumers Power Company's implementation of the comitments listed in Reference 1 and overall readiness to resume construction.
In Reference 1, seven new comitments were made in order to enhance the implementation of the overall quality program and performance of the job with regard to the soils remedial work.
The following is a listing of the
.comitments and discussion of their status:
1.
Retaining a third party to independently assess the implementation of the auxiliary building underpinning work.
Status:
Stone and Webster and Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas
,are on site, are implementing the independent assessment program, and are fully prepared to assess underpinning construction activities.
L 2.
Integrating the soils QA and QC functions under the direction of MPQAD.
Status:
The soils quality functions have been integrated under the direction of MPQAD.
QC inspection personne arebefg 7g oc1182-3219a112
~()
d / #4 l
SERIAL 20262 2
recertified_ir, accordance with MPQAD procedure 3M-1.
QC inspectors necessary to start Pier 12 are qualified.
A certificatidn schedule has been developed to insure that the required inspectors will be available to support construction activivites.
3.
Creating a " Soils" project organization with dedicated employees and a single-point accountability to accomplish all work _ covered by the ASLB order.
Status:
The soils team under the direction of J A Mooney is in place and is in charge of all work covered under thi April 30, 1982 ASLS order; 4
Establishing new and upgraded training. activities, including a special quality indoctrination program, specific training in underpinning activities, and the use of a mock-up test pit for underpinning construction training.
~
Status:
The training program has been upgraded and personnel involved in the soils remedial work have received the appropriate training.
The pier mock-up has been completed and procedural modifications as a result of the mock-up work have been incorporated into the specific construction procedures of piers 12 E/W; 5.
Developing a Quality Improvement Program (QIP), specifically for soils remedfal work.
Status:
The QIP Program manual for soils was issued on September 24, 1982.
In' addition, supervisory orientation sessions have been initiated; 6.
Increasing senior management involvement in the soils remedial project through weekly, on-site management meetings wherein both work progress
[
and quality activities are reviewed.
Status:
The on-site meetings are held with management involvement as noted; 7.
Improving systems for tracking of and accounting for design commitments.
Status:
The comitment list' for Piers 12 E/W and for work through. the end of the year has been issued.
The total commitment list is l
in review and will be issued prior to December 22, 1982;
~
In addition to the specific comitments above, the following is the status of related items (numbering system continued from above) for work on Piers 12 East and 12 West:
1 l
8.
The engineering specifications have been issued for constructiori (with changes from the mock-up incorporated as noted in 4 above);
oc1182-3219a112
'I SERIAL 20262 3
9.
The. engineering drawings have been issued for construction (with changes from the mock-up incorporated as noted in 4 above);
10.
The subcontractors construction prncedures have been issued for construction (with changes from the mock-up incorporated as noted in 4 above);
11.
The PQCI's and PIPR's have been issued based on Item 10 above; Based on the' discussion outlined above, CP Co believes that the soils program
~has been thoroughly and critically evaluated and that all prerequisites for successful implementation of Piers 12 East and 12 West have been accomplished.
The. Company's program, with the initial overview from the independent implementation assessment team, and the continuing overview by the NRC-staff and management-should provide adequate assurance that the remedial soils
, activities will be successfully implemented.
~
Accordingly Consumers Power Company requests authorization to proceed with the work specified in Reference 2 which will specifically allow the start of Pier 12 West followed one week later by the start of Pier 12 East.
Consumers Power Company By James W Cook Sworn and subscribed to before me on this 6th day of December,1982.
Notary Public, Jackson County, Mich My commission expires JWC/JRS/jlh CC RJCook, Midland Resident Inspector
.DSHood, US NRC WDShafer,"US NRC, Region III
/>@f.fw_ ? A?, u.C 2R-, &E - G oc1182-3219a112
.,,,.n,
,,~--
w*='~'~'~
' ~
" '