ML20093N690
Text
_______ _.
-;.y
$Dh n
-r Jciefar. trnn-ntaston %
a.
.,,,c
,. 1,... t,.,,. n,.... e...
- e., n
.......t
...._ e. -. t. a. n m.at...
to
~ ~,!
3,,,,.. c. r, ri. i c,, in i i. n
. t i..e
~
...e
--,y fri
- F eine I se 1IphI cr py.
' r y l.
t h y 2 fi, I!88 1 yn
,N.
I'c a r !!r. T.c pp l e r,
w l }.t.~ I i want t o t ha nt: ynn oca in f ear e oe t itic "lt ma l't s t 'llinr edny
[
in Illdinnd.
Your etI e cet ncn r avnl ere nore:n e in entnre me I o re-rnnnica te T
vith yen enec vioic.
[g * ;:. ",
1 nm I re l ud l oc.,-y a crent retfonn t ble h we 1. sicily d8cenmacd.
i I am piso liit:In.Ilnc reta, jorn in.tle erretta n1 It la tay t'tidoret ending i
QOM f r s== Constemers and some I:l:C pct menne I that fle"y t='y not hnvc been i
hh prc=enteri to the Itir, j
.fR I.%.[.i I nIno viele te I:nve t hle final inent inte yevr npcei.Ine. QA
. f.
efccinian. You con il.'o r < et renener e n th neceptable in 197n hernuse Y.d..
thoy identify tier 1r ci n ste f I < l e.e t e =, A 1:hnnch I cong idct such M
,)
IdentiIlentIcn n 11 Ic chlitntlen, e ven thie Is qvcetlennble in 1980
' p- :.- t cenalderlor, 1) the Ir
.t, n t.it nf a flA b.
- ilorn 19 goII= in their
, J.- s An=rer to r:ot J cc cf tie p r inc.. ?) th It - indline. of the ".nrh rnt ter, ant!
,MJ 3)
~"
~
fire.le t e l ' ee e f e bho li i ng o f I n f re nn t le." reinteel le the Pipe 1Thip t
ip]
ncettnint problem (ehich etatre h m e l, e. 17# scroer 78-10).
-j
- w:
l h ',..:.a F ren t4"t c l~perennt it -n tbr 'ldent i f fi el len of pr oble e e, 1* the
?
K' rc9elutten of pechinaa onen f.IrnsIIIed.
It la npp* nnt in pleaent
- 7'[ [; ]
cvery tailor pr obit m estn re n, um.. a ba= coconne ered ever the yert r e,
- g tien t the weciller cut el probleta r eur t re, avnt til t i-1t c receint ion
,f:p{;;;
cf the preble,ag 1:a = tuve e.ecurved in n t imely ta'nner. on t heir pra lpLg Init intive, ns yen air vcll pente.
~
I li Perhapa tbn heat exo-ple nf t ie f v l er repenmers nrreptnure of c.
- L j-<e poor quen i t t y pe r f orce'nti-by 14thtcl. vbIch ha-been the innterlyine,
- s t e n u n c o f p n vas tiy p t,$ b i g not.
I vcn s bi i, Ihe pt eble 'a bon been Identiiled,
) ), j ' 1 na in their 1075 In"-nt t nr*Inne reehici foe nerifernce in reisst rne-K, ';..
t i en n nd sle= J p n o f in 11 ente n, et na in the ir s ceton c t o 50-5/e f eg.23 3
"y T ns to root enture of t bc noll cet t le ru nt r' eb l o r". the re Pechtel
{r,:if.I h
ticficiencica are ten.fened nintelcatfor<t to ter"*t t in. meelve s.
w' r,
Ycur !!nv. 74 l'ints fat p i cp,,,s t nept the pont FAl.P nssesrt,cnt Lh,;.t '
of their 9% refot= t e rt ninly Indira' ret reed f or 1"T r over$ n t. And
- 5. "..
n1 hauch I nm not in a ponfIIen i o et.t n in 1.n e d 1:sf c nit lest nbout g'l this twoat s cre tit per iod of fl% pet f oe mvire. I ninterntnant Ihnt Itiry T.'-
Sjncinir hns n inpc i n rh l t h ret l.*, =.t l eene n thr le reluctat.co to 1
vI '
rerpor t Q% esiticon, t h lrls rvey t enf i r m vhrit bne herrt efore been only j.. :
- henrany, f,
- i t
.r
('
i
< N-8408020107 840718 H
P.&
S RICE 84-96 PDR G
1 f ft W
'r
.. ~ -
e
..s I
t ** t 8?tnaa-ets dirnprecs float recently. I *
- a.I In in8'y'- Impre 1
elih t lie IDet! ete t he sitt ere I t y el I alt int ver : en t he re,,Il her e pipes i
t he r e eI r'* n e e r e-t l a t ed. t$nco acntn they wbl]c not ll verotte sai 4
scch to Pine" vel at tbelt een 1-1. vishent rya-I nit :: tlic f aill cr. tent cr. r on't entire ei the pt el lcm.
l e tae. 11:1e enva r-a
- c nbent Costeur*cre hd[
ij f la rinnasre Jn I a t t iI pe'c ccercenien 9A peahler5, ninf bov it r evi11oe the s av=..
t ha n any = t a t e.ar n t e of Inttitt or 1-pre-rive l',pr ovrear nt s an
',Q ik i deraenst rated f ri Ilic inepceslen lor s we
- I:.
fife
' U I' I do tio t crlelcira tha ;c=pectlen Itarli na It took pinte Inst
,fhf.
I uni e r r t nifel t he filtC verk.
lint I con ttrrIbiy ecencrtine8*1th rhnt t
Int evi s t e iln ui t le tien t report in t e r vaa cf fronrinc five venre of l
f?f n
, M, _,
pont QA ele f ic icne:laa besnnac of it.
At the I;ce. 74 19 t10'." AI.P
.h eeat tue, yco rn id t'en t yen Int ene's d t o Iny eet abc broad overview cf Cenei*nere en peileiri,nce ne yen elld at t i a t,,cr t inc., nint let yg"E the Itnard etc. l.Ir "1 t he i r 9% a t t i l 'Ir f ena l b l ei" po you titiv intend (y' O r;
to pr'e=ent a concluelen inntend?
i@ l,.
rjlwe;",
I have no chaire but to relac tbcac qn*=tlens need contervis,
}l f or I n'a deeply tilr t e r nee d vi t h v1.a t I pre <tevelepInc. nnd belpst fy,.
f leiet t f red se spele h ty, fly.cence s es rer's bryend the effect of this 4
enn'entlan, to i t s pr of outeil Q;.,
pendine stipalstion nn var coac nr
!=pl i t n t leine for Ioelt htal t h eteil r n f e t v tius r f it'i+r. l et tits' rest
'~
k.["
of t he pr orrrellop, nod for f:ttt' ter"I*'Ints ni n 9 hole.
Kti.
$l l.
': int ri r I v.
- 91., - i
{ $'
'in t bne n F t ensf r I n a
q t8, iT
..j f,. -
e
,3
.a..
4**
P * ?$ 3 t
7 t
yC i
,s1 V-i ff J
.4
>p u_
i' r
}
.)
[,,.
E4 J
r I,
,"y
,1 o_,
{.
Rej
'...i iA.i W
p]d
[
r e
W, gy
'e w
L.
,..... i..i s..,
Kane g
COC\\
D k
l 11** liesvor abia Chatica Pee-blet o f er Chnlt saan of t lie htemic !M f aty and I.lcen*'i nn P"ar'l l
flucJenr Pe solatory Cemirri bn j
ifn hington, lic 20r S",
i Dc:r Judoe Pechhocter*
't In relatlon to tha Conenmer'n Pr.>ve r r:99tinty. Midtend flottenr Pintet Doeltet tiurther enntinnally atisa wit h,cet act to the 1
50-329 anel 50-310, ecrico: Ine -t. s en a leproper flitino of tino t'Idlated tint-lear I lont.
A
- o n e r '"*P l a, tecent datas showri timt the rirl:= of low 1avel andlatinn is eventat titan shat vn= 4c11cved to be the ecce only ena year n tre.
Feience f *= in r l e.c r..r ? ? **,y, 1 'n) at=a Jndicates that p
'l radiation is even enra towlc to human I et n r-t hen vnm I Ile ved when t.has !!!dland
]
P!nnt was fitted wltliin tha city af f*ldland.
't
,l ro r the t ta*ir a, tha plant wa9 sited in the fit *"o rinin of the Tittalnvamace Ittvers, whleh increnwe= the *9tential hnravd to public haalth an.s cafety over and alove
~
th7 new radiation harard by t hl= lescre.rer ly et t ed sinclent plant, e
Th2 ff ar let on Int ervenor e nirec erely I. Ileve that tl a Atet-Ic Sa f ety Licensing lioned chnnld take Ir-aadi at a ect. inn to eter ccne'rnetinn of tha Hidland truelcar Plant for 1
th> following ren*one:
1.
S i t l ei<t of glant within eta ci t y of talelland in violation of flPC
~
i elting rulce neul e c9nint inun.
2.
111erc9ard of tha hund'"4 Yast f leadlen rt't etet in t of tlie river in hnildino the pInnt en t ha un=*n.ta fInnd plain.
s 1
3.
Sinki n9 tif +nl 141:n pi and In'etabilit y of innterne r'nno pipIno an pointed cut in linc increction= tif the plant.
as 4.
Que=t ionel.le 1"al i t y ennt rol re e.n:edu, an in I nlldina t he pinnt,
ptilnted out I y I!Pt Irrrre etient.
S.
A prelnbla p:st reet 191' f r r 11 tal f irst len and/or deccaturri t ion and de-rtabillration of tiec t yt c t.f f ann l't le n c"'-t nal t ion in conat t uction at this nit e.
{
i 6.
Quc'itlanable ntability c*l' rella, ennd nnd rott, in which foundation t
footinqn nta alted.
3 J
]
7.
The neccan t ty I<> clicilnat e I1781 fle;ntlen I ot ent Int due to the general water ce.nillttone in t he al ri tetuit 'r en't tr at inn of a par nennnt dewatcr-I ing mystem for tha plant.'s alte.
{
B.
The rot ent ial cr oct al peli f t t ea n i t i n't tre,envern = alt and brine i
exts act lon neut nt har ta$4-ta*da und"e nt "unal ne't t vi t len,
i i
Me -
o 1
f-
- - -.. ~_ _
.a
a N
4
'Ihe lit.nnt ab)a 8'im* lee f*ce filer c f e r
.Sune 3, tant rnoa Tvn 9.
The pr e.ihabic ctust inna t et ruetter e sat t icearit in the etivapacted fill rene.
q.
30.
A recent study n= pol.I t anc.s in <:ct enec, pth et t' y, I?871. Indientes niericar platite will ba at I
that in tha 100 's, elect r iele y f rara tiow lenet 259 t est e cireanniva t hars elect rie (ty f rem siaw coal pin,nta.
if i
I c.t erst t al C r i t I'l e t ** alpanrinet les g rF. Spectr:1rit,
"T)cet ravase,snae lc I is p eces ffny InnI, pp. 4 I. 4 t. nnd iera *p;nt i en r ravr-r St ce'. t n" Jinna, 1"PJ, pp.
4n-49 paint ri set
- t he eer inns r"r pr e bica whic h hae sitet barn a44tenned by the f:PC in the chleidlnet of tinrient plants to ptotret f rert ' rrtrs.
Prmetrir.
1, p e a.te+. w n, a non-I c.i e enf et y cri.s t' nee e with tiPC. contentla 4
a non:lont venpan in *lnte over tlia l'ni t ed that i f new criemy (fa tt'eint esi j
Stataa, r.t'ra ennld Inl t Int c r alt -dawn 9 lei cycey nuclent rencter in j
the enterst r y.
Ita enn tarie) t ive vnincrahtilt y cuet l'a overcer-* by le preectitly dnna with lerartant clet t renics, cerraunigntions, s h l a 1.f i n't, na and other f aelli t.len eene:l t ive to r"ra.
Ni in well known, coal plants n e c no t-en-e art. II'la to r"rm er cre e raa l f - ek v'ie.
37.
Finally, na a ae-nlt of t lic Frienrr nt'lela a:4to'1 abnve, thia new I n f n t r,s t l ein will. cec *altate tha t eve lt inn e f f lee raany b*gle tinctivecnt s on f lee ha r s, et i nf r aillat iers j nc tisilti; tina elef in i t Ive work "The 1%f) 13 A P. fM od y tus t h e r f f a * * 's aC !s is le've l ' l'ad l a t t ais".
In view of" tt:Im, your bone d ahnu t d act iebe ly rt*ne le1< r tha hesith en.1 enfety of tha ftlaland pnpul at ion wl.o will ba cypored i n e ndl at lan A l me.bn e nc's frerm the plant.
In view of the abova tvelve t en e.t.n *, t iva P'rl e' n's 1 p' c e vent'r a, on 1.chnif of the haalt.h and enf ety of tire tilai nen1 r"pai nt len, veelcetfolly in*pu"it that plant conatruction be at"rped until the twalva l ' ce's l i e.t cil ns.~ve nec co plately rentelved.
4 Plence rintia copices of fbla Ittter n y 11 ) 'li) r* to t's. I',I[ h S. lia*;ker afn! f*r. Frederick P. Cowan, Pamber's of yenir baned, onel t o niet I"* cele whee ehemlit hava ceipl ea.
't Sincerely,*
t.
i
, y4 ; "
/ ;'. -
,/.'.v.,)jlar t
f t cye-J. Cri j
l/
Techolcal Cnnnultant t'aplet on int ar vanne n a
p--
cet Wendell 11 fin r e h a l l Itealdent I'9 p] ci tui Ifit cf Vetint a F.tG/ nra
\\
., ~ : ::. : D
'(
y 19 I c
.c c
D5pnie ho Idf 3 h1TED STATES OF AMERICA UCo
- j. m.ik[
h
- D*
3,
[/s,
r [ 45i y NUCLEAR RECULATORY CO)DtISSION p,
Lb Y
p j
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSINC BOARD
- }
al C
In the Matter of'
)
S
)
Docket Nos. 50-329-0M
.j CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY
)
50-330-0M 1
)
50-329-OL (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2) )
50-330-OL
)
j CONSUMER POWER COMPANY'S ANSWER
- - a TO NRC STAFF INTERROGATORIES
.h u
s Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 52.740b, Consumers Power Company hereby resconds.to NRC l
Staff Interrogatories 1-3.
I Interrogatory 1
. Have any laboratory.cettselidation takts been conducted on samples of. plant.
i
, fill that were recovered in the diesel generator building foundation area since the removal of.the surcharge load in August of 19797 Anwar
~
l No laboratory consolidation tests have been conducted.on samples l
l 3f plant fill from the diesel generator building area since removal of the e
surcharge load.
.}
Interrogatory 2 i
S.,
If the. answer to Interrogatory one is yes, please provide ris'lts and u
conclusion with regard to future settlement of the diesel gene'r,ator building.
Answer Since the answer to Interrogatory Number 1 is, no, this is not applicable.'
Interrogatory 3
' hat is the reason for the discrepancy in the magnitude of the loading stress indicated.on Figure 2 (September 14, 1980 Report,." Discussions of the Applicant,'s Position on the Need for Additional Borings") with inforriation' previously. provided~
in response to NRC Question No. 4. Table No. 4-1A (Volume 1) and on Tab:e 2.5-14 '
of the TSAR (Volume 4)? This ( ancern involves both dead and live loads at foundation elevation 628 feet at the time of surcharge and for long term plant operaciun conditions.
- ) g s,2.
. an a an
\\\\
,,.wu,7,
y:
y
.~
. a_
2,
(
Answer 4
h Data concerning the diesel generator building in the three Tables and i
y
.I figures' referenced in the interrogatory (i.e. Figure 2 of the report,
' Discussion of the Applicant's Position on the Need for Additional Borings "
U -
' Table 4-1A of the response to 10CFR 50.54, Question 4 regarding plant fill, v.
and FSAR Table 2.5-14) were prepared for different purposes and with different assumptions. Hence, the different loads presented in these tables and figures do not constitute a discrepancy.
e e
y,
[
The value given for the stress under the diesel generator building in FSAR
' Table 2.5-14 was used to demonstr' ate the factor of safety for bearing capacity.
D For the diesel generator' building this information is contained in 'the Response I
tid 10CFR 50.54, Question 35 regarding plant fill. Table 4-1A of the Response to I
Question 4 was prepared to show a settlement history and prediction of future j
settlement, which were based on measured settlement data taken during the surcharge l'
1
- W.not on the approximate load data presented in the cabin. Figure 2 of the report
" Discussion of the Applicant's Position on the Need for Additional Borings" vee
' foutaitt,ed to show with particularity the stress distribution below the building 8 d5 various elevations along a vertical line durias the preload, and to compare 22hmee stresses with stresses which would be felt during normal operations.
With' regard to FSAR Table 2.5-14, the stress level indicated for the diesel
~
- _ generator building (4.5 kys) was taken at the point along the building foundation
, having the largest contact stress. This, stress consists of the dead load of the O
structure' (excluding the grade slab) and the full design live load for structural L(
.. purposes of the intermediate floor and roof. This design live load is larger than the load expected to be transferred to the fou'ndation soil because calculations i,
of live loads for structural purposes must be based on the full design live loads 6
l
(
1; 5
_ = _ _, - _ _...... _. _.. _..
.-2 u
c __
3
,z;;.
_u g
h
, *t.
~
f whereas the soil will experience some reduced value of live load based on'
~
actual building occupancy.
- The live load expected to be transferred to the
,4 foundation soil has been conservatively estimated to be 25% of the fu'd. design
[
live load.
The latest bearing capacity calculations which were made and presented in the September 14, 1980 Report (" Discussion of Applicant's Fonition on the
[
Meed for Additional Borings") and in the answer to 10 CFR 50.54f, Question 40, regarding plant fill, did not use 4500 psf as the applicable load. Instead,,
a value of 3400 paf, which represents the not maximum dead load, wa.s ut(Lized.
t
\\
The Applicant intends to modify its latest bearing capacity calculations to l
L
- account for live loads, in its next Amendment.
1 Data presented in Table 4-1A of the Response to Question 4 shows the average 7l approximate pressure (averaged over the building area rather than taken at any particular point as in Figure 2 and in FSAR Table 2.5-14).at the foundat, ion level at various times. Exact data at any particular point or time were not ft presented in Table 4-1A, which was included to give the reader some indication L
of the approzimate stresses applicable during the various stages of the construction process. The load data in Table 4-1A were not used to. predict future settlement nor to verify the adequacy of the preload. The dead'1oad y,
J portion of the loading pressures for Table 4-1A consists of 'the appr'nt te o
li l
rj weight of.the structure. The live load portion (.8 kys in stages V and VI) ls consists of the approximate full design live load of the roof, intermediate L
floor and grade slab. Piping and equipment were included in the live load
?
increment.
-m--
.--->a
./
/;
'4
}
_g.
A e
Figu're 2 of the report " Discussion of the Applicant's Position on CLe Need for
(,j
.' Additional Borings" was presented to show the stress distributica below the
.a
]
building during and af ter surcharge. For this presentation the foundation footing pressure at the building's southwest corner was used. The dead load t
h' shown includes the superstructure weight, and the live load is the actual' F
espected live load during the life of the building. This is estimated to be
~23X of the full design live load. kiso included in the live load increment of this figure are piping and equipment loads. The Applicant intends to nahe a slight modification of Figure 2 in the near future to account for construction aftar removal of the surcharge.
2 e
t
.j 1
i
/
?
e
.' a ;.
- M
- !st.
+
r e
.8
- ' t. C *.
t
- ?*.
i
,q
,.w e
e e
D
}.
~
w-.c
-?
, l p
to i
4 UNITCD STATCS OF AMEP. CA N
NL' CLEAR RF.CULATOP.Y CO*tMISSION Vff. L'~q O
ll BEFOP.L THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSINC ROA'ID
.g
- g In the Matter of
)
DOCKET N05. 50-329 CONSU!!ERS F0WER COMPANY
)
50-330-0 N f
)'
50-329-OL q
(Midland, Unita 1 and 2)
)
50-329-OL
)
)
COUNTY OF WASMTENAW)
)ss STATE OF MICHIGAN )
.)
AFFIDAVIT OF NEAL SWANBERC Neal Swanberg, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he' is employed by Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, as an Assistant c
Project Engineer; that he is jointly responsible with, Sherif Afift for providing answers to NRC Staff Interrogatories to Consumers Power Company Numbers 1-3, and that to the best of his knowledge and belief the above information and the answers to the above interrogatories are true and correct.
4 Neal Swanberg Subscribed and sworn to before se this
/$
day of ///s w ltv 1980.
/
A
/
- ~
Notary Public, Washtenaw County, Michigan MyCoemissionExpiresthhs, w b 3{. //Q
...,n.
e l
_,.,r--.e=M--
' ~~~
_ =-
~:
l i
r e
l l
a g
n.
i UNITED STATES OF AMERICA o
".g Ig i.TCLEAk REGULATORY CottMISSION l
. BEFORE TlfE ATOMIC SA TY AND LICENSINC MOARD IO196( )
Milt @ 9/
T.
In the Matter.of
)
DOCKET Nos. 50-329%
b
~l CONSthfERS Poller COMPANY
)
50-330 3
s
)
50-329-OL M
(Midland, Units 1 and 2)
)
50-329-OL t
)*
1 COUNTY OF WASMTENAW) e
)ss
+
STATE OF MICHICAN )
bj AFFIDAVIT OF SHERIF AFIFI Sherif Afifi, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is
- employed by Bechtel Associates Profsseional Corporation, as an Engineering i
Supervisor; that he is jointly responsible with Neal Swanberg for providing I
' answers to NRC Staff Interrogatories to Consumers Power Company Nuenbers 1-3, and that to the best of his knowledge and belief the above information and the answers to the above interrogatories are true and correct.
a I
i Sherif Afifi Subscribed and sworn to before me this
/d day of d ec h 1980.
e k
J
.1A t
w Notary Public Washtenaw County, Michigan My Conmission Expires: h w k e77 8 //f*
4
- 7:_.........
..i....... 1...i
. L d...i,1 %
u_a
.7,"_,-
I' N
Ms. Mary Sinclair 5
5711 Summersec Street 7 --
Midland, Michigan 48640 I
William D. Paton, Esq.
~ '
Counsel for the NRC Staff
.J U. S. Nuclear Regulacory Cossaission' l
Washington, D. C. 20555 Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Barbara Stamiris 5795 Horth River Road e
Route 3 Freeland, Michigan 48623 Sharon K. Warren 636 Hillcrest Midland, Michigan 48640 l
l EamesE.Brunner,Esq.
t Consumers Power Company l
212 West Michigan Avenue
. ackson, Michigan 49201 Mr. Michael A. Race 2015 Seventh Street Bay City, Michigan, 48706 Ms. Sandra D. Raist 1301 Fourth'St.
.j Bay City, Michigan 48640
~
Lester Kornblith, Jr.
Atomic Safety & Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
Washington, D. C.
20555 b.
Tamas E. Brunner 1;
r
\\i
- x.....,
(
3 ~.
Na
~,
[*
E
{,
4 f'
.[
l r'
'J