ML20087D321

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Draft Equipment Qualification Data Package, Rev 4 to EQDP-ESE-13, Process Protection Sys
ML20087D321
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 06/30/1983
From: Rahe E
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20087D270 List:
References
EQDP-ESE-13, WCAP-8587S1R4-ESE-13, NUDOCS 8403130358
Download: ML20087D321 (22)
v • d • e


Text

.- . .

. 1

)ESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 l EQDP-ESE-13 Rev. 7 +/83 Y (o ,

I EQUIPENT 00ALIFICATION DATA PACKAGE I f This document contains information, relative to l the qualification of the equipment identified below, in accordance with the methodology of WCAP L 8587. The Specification section (Section 1)

{ defines the assumed limits for the equipment 1 qualification and constitutes interface requirements to the user.

PROCESS PROTECTION SYSTEM

~

APPROVED:

E. P. Rane, manager tsclear Safety Department Westinghouse Electric Corporation Nuclear Energy Systems P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 8403130358 840306 PDR ADOCK 05000482 A PDR 7909A:1/012183 1

)EST8NGHOUSE CLASS 3 SECTION 1 - SPECIFICATIONS 1.0 PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS 1.1 Electrical Requirements

1.1.1 Voltage

Cabinet power supply in: 118 1 5% VAC Cabinet power supply out: 26 1 1 VDC (pr.imary),

24 1 2 VDC (backup) 1, i .2 Current: Cabinet power supply in: 21.5 A max. steady state, inrush 10 times steady state

1.1.3 Frequency

Cabinet power supply in: 60 1 3% Hz; 55 max. harmonic distortion Cabinet power supply out: DC 1.1.4 Load: N/A -

1.1.5 Electromagnetic Interference: N/A 1.1.6 Other: N/A 1.2 Installation Reauirements: Per WISD Drawings 8797D33 Rev. 9 and 8797D34 Rev. 9.

1.3 Auxiliary Devices: None l l

1.4 PreventativeMaintenanceSchedulei.Asaresultofthecompletion of the Westinghouse Aging Evaluation Program (References 5 and 6) no maintenance beyond that defined in the equipment instruction manual *is required to support the qualified life defined in Section 1.9. .

~

1.5 Design Life: 40 years -

1.6 Operating Cycles (Expected number of cycles during design life, including test): Continuous. Refer to Appendix Al of WCAP-8687 (Reference Si for mechanical cycling of the potentiometer and relay.

7909A:1/050283 2

  • ~

. - i

+ ..

  • .R 1.7 Performance togstraments for(b): Aeacter Trip. Engineered Safeguard Functions and Post Accident Hoeltering Centalement DEE Conditleas(a) Post DGE Conditions (a) j Hermal Abaermal Test Parameter Conditless Conditlens Conditless FLS/RB LOCA Selselc FLO/5LB LOCA Selsmic 1.7.1 Tlee reclutrement Centlaucus 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> ,Il/A Event- Event. Event 'Contlamous Coattauous Coattamous

. duration ,

duretten durstlen 1.7.2 Performance regstrement Ilote c Isote d II/A uste c Ilote c elote c Ilete e uste c alote c

. 1.4 Enviroemental Candittens for Same Function (b) ,

1.6.1 Temperature!*F) 60-80 Flp 1 M/A Ambient Ambient Aehteet Ambient Ambient Ambient Canditlen 3 ac 1.8.2 Pressure (psig) Ambient Ambient N/A Ashleat Ambient As49ent Ambient Ashlent Ambient 8

a 1.8.3 Ilueldity (5 Mil 30-50 Fig. 1 M/A Ashleat Ashleat Ashleat Ashleat .% lent Anblent ,

conditten 3 1.8.4 Radiatlea (R) *400 Included II/A lacluded laciuded Ilene included Included Mome [

hder Mosual hder tiermal beer Hermal hder liessel hder Normal 1.8.5 Cheetcals lisme 11eae ll/A Itsee liene lione. liesse tiene leone 1.8.6 Vibretten IInne liene II/A Mene Ilmas lione leone thee lione i 1.8.7 Acceleratten Igl liene tiene al/A Ilesp tiene Fig. 3 Mene liene liene 1,

Ilotes: a: BAE la the Sesign Basis Event.

b: Norgia is met lacluded in the p6rameters of this secties. i c: Channel accuracy

  • 0.51 span.

4: Chamael accuracy T 1.01 span.

i \

  • - ESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 1.9 Qualiffed Life: 5 years.

1.10 Remarks: None

.e J

I l

l

~

l 1

1 7909A:1/011983 4 s

ESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 SECTION 2 - QUALIFICATION BY TEST 2.0 TEST PLAN Abnormal Environment and Seismic tests were perforsned in the testing laboratories at Westinghouse Industry Electronics. Division (H IED) in O'Hara Township, PA. and Westinghouse Advanced Energy Systems Division (W AESD) in large, PA.

2.1 Equipment

Description:

Westinghouse ISD 7300 Serie: Equipment o 2-Bay Process Protection Cabinet o 3-8ay Process Protection Cabinet o PC Cards and Card Frames o NIS, N-16 Subsystems

~

2.2 Number Tested: Type test on one (1) of each equipment type

2.3 Mounting

Cabinet: floor mounted with bolts. ,,

Cards: mounted in card frames.

2.4 Connections

Malticonductor cables.

2.5 Aging Simulation Procedure:

By a separate component test program described by Subprogram C of Appendix B to WCAP-8587 and reported in Reference 5.

i 7909A:1/012183' 5

l 2.6 Service Conditions to be Simulated by Test III Natainment Normal Abnorinal Test Seismic ELB Pos t-ELB 2.6.1 Temp. (*F) Ambient Fi g'. 2 N/A Ambient N/A N/A 2.6.2 Pressure (psig) Ambient Ambient N/A Ambient N/A N/A 2.6.3 Numidity (1 RH) ~ Ambient Fig. 2 N/A Ambient N/A N/A 2.6.4 Radiation (R) None Mone N/A Mone N/A N/A Ni b

2.6.5 Chemicals None Monsi N/$ None N/A N/A N,

l 2.6.6 Vibration None Mr.e N/A None N/A N/A n E

' 2.6.7 Acceleration (g) None None N/A Fig. 3(2) N/A N/A w 1

. I

f WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 2.7 Measured Yariables This section identifies the parameters required to be measured during 1

)

the test sequence (s). ,

I A. Seismic Test B. Operational Test, Nonna1 and Abnonnal Conditions 2.7.1 Category I - Environment Required Not Required 2.7.1.1 Temperature B A 2.7.1.2 Pressure A,8 2.7.1.3 Moisture B . A 2.7.1.4 Composition A,8 2.7.1.5 Seismic Acceleration A B 2.7.1.6 Time A,8 2.7.2 Category II - Input Electrical Characteristics

~

2.7.2.1 Voltage -

A,8 i 2.7.2.2 Current A,8 ~

2.7.2.3 Frequency A,8(3) 2.7.2.4 Power A,8 2.7.2.5 Other A,8 2.7.3 Category III - Fluid Characteristics 2.7.3.1 Chemical Composition A,8 2.7.3.2 Flow Rate A,8 2.7.3.3 Spray A,8 2.7.3.4 Temperature ,

A,8 l

7909A:1/011963 7

. _ . . - . .~. _ . . - - _ .

)ESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 Required Not Required 2.7.4 Category IV - Radiological Featurer 2.7.4.1 Energy Type A,8 2.7.4.?. Energy Level A,B 2.7.4.3 Dose Rate A,B 2.7.4.4 Integrated Dose A,8 2.7.5 Category V - Electrical Characteristics 2.7.5.1 Insulation Resistance ,

A,8 2.7.5.2 Output Voltage A,B I3) 2.7.5.3 Output Current A,B 2.7.5.4 Output Power A,B 2.7.5.5 Response Time A,B 2.7.5.6 Frequency Characteristics- .

A,8 2.7.5.7 Simulated Load .

A,8 2.7.6 Category VI - Mechanical Characteristics 2.7.6.1 Thrust A,8 2.7.6.2 Torque A,8 2.7.6.3 Time A,8 2.7.6.4 Load Profile A,B 2.7.7 Category VII - Auxiliary Equipment .

None f

.l l

i

. \

)

7909A:1/011983 8

WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 2.8 Test Sequenca Preferred This section identifies the preferred test sequence as specified in IEEE-323-74, Section 6.3.2.

l 2.8.1 Inspection of Test Item 2.8.2 Operation (Nomal Condition) 2.8.3 Operation (Perfomance Specifications Extremes, Section 1) 2.8.4 Simulated Aging 2.8.5 Seismic Vibration 2.8.6 Operation (Simulated lj,igh E_nergy kine 8,reak Conditions) 2.8.7 Operation (Simulated Post IEL8 Conditions) l 2.8.8 Inspection 2.9 Test Sequence Actual

. This section identifies the actual test sequence (s) used in the qualification of the 7300 Series Process Protection System. The ,

following subsections indicate separate test sequences completed on different, but essentially identical, equipment and/or components.

The justification for employing anything other than the preferred sequence is as follows:

The 08E is simulated by the test sequence of Section 2.9.2. The HELS Tests (Sections 2.8.6 and 2.8.7) are not required since the 7300 Series Process Protection System is, due to its location, not exposed to the }EL8 envirorument. The aging test employs the preferred test sequence (Section 2.8) excluding IEL8 and Abnormal Extremes (Sections 2.8.6, 2.8.7 and 2.8.3) on a representative sample of components from the Process Protection System. The Aging

(

Tests demonstrate that during the qualified life there are no in-service aging mechanisms capable of reducing the capability of ,

the Process Protection System to perform during or after a seismic event. As a consequence, the seismic testing on the un-aged 7300 Series Process Protection System equipment is not prejudiced by any in-service aging mechanisms.

7909A:1/020483 9

y', WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 Step Notes 2.9.1 Production Test Sequence 2.8.1 System test performed on all production units 2.8.2 2.8.8 2.9.2 Environmental and Seismic Test Sequence 2.8.1 2.8.2 t 2.8.3 Abnormal Environment extremes followed by seismic

'2.8.5 test on the same equipment 2.8.8 2.9.3 Aging Test Sequence 2.8.1 2.8.2 Aging is addressed by separate testing as

' 2.8.4 described in Subprogram C of Appendix B to, 2.8.5 WCAP-8587 and reported in References 5 and 6.

2.8.8 ,

7909A:1/050283 10

~- - - - - - - - - ~ - -- - - - - - - - - --

- )ESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 2.10 Type Test Data 2.10.1 Objective ,

i l

The objective of this qualification test program is to demons-trate, employing the reconnended practices of Regulatory Guide 1.89 (IEEE-323-1974) and Regulatory Guide 1.100 (IEEE-344-1975) the capability of the 7300 Series Process Protection System to perfom its safety related functions described in Section 1.7 while subjected to the simulated abnormal environments and seismic service conditions defined in Section 1.8.

2.10.2 Equipment Tested 2.10.2.1 Normal Environment Testing A system 5st under norinal environmental condi-tions is performed on each 7300 Series Process

- Protection System at the completion of the '

~

manufacturing process.

2.10.2.2 Abnomal Environment and Seismic Testing The modules which are used in the 7300 Series Process Protection System were tested. For details see Table 1 of Reference 1.

2.10.2.3 Aging Evaluation Program A representative sample of critical components from the 7300 Series Process Protection System is i included in Subprogram C of the Aging Evaluation f Program described in Appendix 8 to WCAP-8587 and l

reported in Reference 5.

7909A:1/012183 11

)EST8NGHOUSE CLASS 3 2.10.3 Test Sunmary 1

~

2.10.3.1 Envirc:::nent Testing Westinghouse requires that the 7300 Series Process Protection equipment be located such that it will not be exposed to an adverse environment as the result of a high energy line break. Therefore testing is only required to demonstrate equipment capability under normal and abnomal service conditions. . . .

Reference 4 sunnarizes the results of available radiation testing of organic and inorganic mate-rials and justifies that for radiation doses less than 104 rads, no deterioration in material '

structural properties is detectable. As a conse-quence, irradiation simulation is not required on this equipment, since estimated in-service 'radia-tion doses will'not prejudice the capability of the equipment to perfom under design basis event -

(i.e. seismic event) conditions.

The environmental testing reported in References 1 and 3 demonstrated the capability of the 7300 Series Process Protection System modules, to meet the safety-related perfomance requirements speci-fied in Section 1.7 when exposed to the abnomal environment specified in Section 1.8. Margin was included in this test by submitting the equipment to a double cycle of electrical ar.d environmental extremes also shown in Figure 2. This test is considered to satisfactorily demonstrate qualifi-cation of the Process Protection System in accor-dance with IEEE-323-1974 Section 6.3.2.(2) and (3).

7909A:1/012183 12

. _ . . - = . - - - . - . .-- - - . -. . ._. .

=, .

s

)ESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3

. 2.10.3.2 Saismic Tests The single design basis event capable of producing an adverse environment at the squipmenc location is s seismic event.

The seismic testing reported in References 1, 2 and 3, was completed on new eauipment employing multi-axis, multi-frequency inputs in accordance with Reg Guide 1.100 (IEEE-344-1975). Reference 2 describes testing of the two sad three bay cabinets. These tests provided the basis for the ,

development of the device required response spectra used in the seismic qualification of Process Protection System modules reported in References 1 and 3. ,

2.10.3.3 Aging Evaluation Subprogram C of the Westinghouse Aging Evaluation Program (Appendix B, WCAP 8587) has incorporated a representative sample of components from the 7300 Series Process Protection System'. This program is completed and is reported in Refer-ence 5. Subprogram C demonstrates that during Um qualified life there are no in-service aging mechanisms capable of reducing the capability of the Process Protection System to perform during or after a seismic event.

2.10.4 Conclusion The currently demonstrated qualified life of the 7300 Series Process Protection System is 5 yea s. Westinghouse is plan-ning an extension of Subprogram C of the Westinghouse Aging Evaluation Program to increase the demonstrated qualified life. The results of the aging program, together with the  !

seismic and environmental testing described herein, demon-strate the qualification of the Process Protection Equip-ment. Because of differences in individual NSSS Process 7909A:1/012183 13

< 6 ESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 Protection Systems, test results must be considered on a plant specific basis to establish the qualification of a l particular Process Protection System. -

2.11 Notes (1) The generic tests completed by Westinghouse employ parameters designed to envelope a number of plant applications. Margin is a plant specific parameter and will be established by the appifcant.

(2) Test response spectrum (TRS) to envelope the required' response spectrum (RRS).

(3) Fmquency and output voltage measurements were required only for the testing reported in Reference 3.

l l

l l

l 7909A:1/012183 14

.1

., ESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 2.12 References i

1. Capone, J. A. , Maurer, B. F. , Schell, L. " Equipment Qualifi-l l cation Test Report Process Protection System (Supplemental Testing)", WCAP-8687, Supplement 2-E13C (Proprietary),

(later)

2. Skeers, D. M. " Equipment Qualification Test Report Process Protection System" WCAP-8687, Supplement 2-E138 (Proprie-tary), January 1981.
3. Coslow, B. J., " Equipment Qualification Test Report,' Process Protection System (Seismic Testing)", WCAP-8687, Supplement 2-E13A (Proprietary), October 1980.

4

! 4. Damerow, F. W., " Effects of Gama Radiation Doses Below 10 Rads on the Mechanical P'roperties of Materials", Appendix C WCAP-8587 (Non-Proprietary) January 1981.

5. Jabs, R., Parello, J., Huang, J., Yalick, M., " Equipment Qualification Tests Report Short Term Component Aging Test Program", WCAP-8685, Supplement 2 Appendix A1 (Proprietary),

March 1981.

6. " Equipment Qualification Test Report Material Aging Analy-sis", WCAP-8687, Supplement 2, Appendix A2 (Proprietary),

March 1981.

4 7909A:1/012183 15

, )ESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 SECTIONS 3 & 4 QUALIFICATION BY EXPERIENCE AND/OR ANALYSIS Westinghouse does not employ operating experience or analysis in support of the qualification program for the 7300 Series Process Protection ,

System.

i 7909A:1/011983 16

e *.

WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 .

TABLE 1 ACTUAL SIALIFICATical TEST CONDITI0sts

@AL ECIPIENT (1) LOCATI0li NAIRFACiutER AtuGANAL/ACCISENT Ellvit000 ENTAL EXTREDES OFSABILITT ACQeRACYll) @AL @AL @AL PROGRAN SVSTEN/CATEG0AV SituCTURE/ AREA TVPE/N00EL PARADE TER SPECIFIEB (2) ORALIFIED M DEN reg g LIFE >'iH00 MF STATUS Centrol W 150 Temperature 120'F 12 hrs. Two +0.5 +0.5 5 Seq. E SE- Dagaing Process Protectica building / 7300 Series. Pressure Atmos. It span span yrs. Test 13 Systes/ leCR Process Rel. hesoldity 951 hr.

4 cycles RPS Protectlen Radiatten 10 R(v)

Cat:gery d III System Chemistry tiene llodules I

Ilotes:

1. For deflattless of category letters, refer to MumEG-0508 "laterte Staff Posittoa en Environmental llualificatlea of Safety-Related Electrical Espelpment." Appendte E. Section 2.

'2. Plant specific environmental parameters are te be laserted by the appitc. ant.

. ~ .

ESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3

_2 -

8. g 3-
3. . -

I

~

I MI 0

E f Ni

- a3E , .g j 3 ! !""

! !!st / g  %

/ -

5 l

5 $ H 4J

  1. 9 p/z h # .!i -

' S. I

?.;.

g s = a e' s s s ae a' p.

4

. . S.

WESTINGHOUSE. CLASS 3

120*F TEMPATURE

}

,------ 82*F

--e.-~~~~~~

955 RH HUMIDITY

325 RH 1

l

+12 :  : 12 r  : 12' e 12

  • HOURS I

l l

l 1

  • Figure 2 Enviramental Test Profile Requirement l

19

, . .) ,.

~'

WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 102 '

a 8 -

}

4 -

2 - .

g l c 1 I

{o 10 3 -

E s I t

4 -

5

> 2 -

4 .

a .

5 100 8  :

H -

4 8 -

4 - (soft: cet atquinas assPenst 3PtcTitues = 0.5 sat ses) 2 -

ig-1 I i I I i11tl I i iiintil i i i i v iii j

10-1 2 4 ea 10 0 2 4 e a 10 1 2 4 e a 102  ;

l FREQUENCY (Hz)

I I

Figure 3 Required SSE Floor Response Spectrum 20 .

E

__ _.._..m. . . ,y _.

l l

SNUPPS Interim Justification Position for the Seismic Qualification of the l Boron Dilution Fix (ESE-47) i i

e e

  • e

l The Baron Dilution Protection System equipment, which consists of the Source and Intennediate Range Drawers, Soarce/ Intermediate Range Detec-tor and Source Range Pre-Amplifier, and f .S Console has completed Seismic and envirc7 mental testing. The seismic testing was successfully completed for all equipment. The Boron Dilution Protection System is classified as NUREG-0588 Categary C equipment.

Although the Source-Range Pre-amplifier successfully passed the seismic and environmental tests, it was noticed to be noise susceptible during system verification testing which leads to an operational concern.

For this reason, a new pre-amplifier (model MK II) was designed. SNUPPS will operate with this redesigned part, which is yet to be seismically qualified. The unit has been functionally tested and determined, in fact, to be a superior design to the MK I with respect to filtering

< extraneous noise. Environmental qualification testing (temperature and humidity cycling) has been performed with successful results. .

Seismic testing of the pre-amplifier will be, accomplished early in 1984.

Again, the MK I demonstrated its quality of design and manuf acture in sustaining its capabilities throughout the range of seismic tests. The MK II's similarities to the previous design with respect to function, size, mounting and manuf acture provide a high degree of confidence that setanic testing of the MK II will be successful.

Upon completion of testing of the MK II pre-amplifier, a draft report titled " Boron Dilution Fix (Source and Intennediate Range Drawers and Source Range Pre-Amplifier)" and a report titled "NIS Console, Source and Intermediate Range Drawers, Source Range Pre-Amplifier Box (Environ-mental Testing)" will be issued.

All reports would then reflect the redesigned equipment. All testing, including reports, will be complete in June 1984.

- __ - ___ - ________- - ______________

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20087D321&oldid=2737044"