ML20087D365

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Draft Equipment Qualification Data Package, Rev 0 to EQDP-ESE-47A, Boron Dilution Fix - Source/Intermediate Range Neutron Detector
ML20087D365
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/1983
From: Rahe E
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20087D270 List:
References
EQDP-ESE-47A, WCAP-8587S1R-ESE-47, WCAP-8587S1R0-ESE-47, NUDOCS 8403130375
Download: ML20087D365 (20)


Text

.. -_ . . ._

% I WESTINGHOUSE Cl. ASS 3 EQDP-ESE-47A gg[ Rev. O, 5/83 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION DATA PACKAGE  ;

This document contains information, relative to the qualification of the equipment identified below, in accordance with the methodology of

' WCAP 8587. The Specification section (Section 1) defines the assumed limits for the equipment qualification and constitute interface require-ments to the user.

Boron Dilution Fix Source / Intermediate Range Neutron Detector .

-t i

APPROVED:

E. P. Rahe, Manager Nuclear Safety Department Westinghouse Electric Corporation Nuclear Energy Systems -

P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 l

8403130375

. PDR ADOCK 0 PDR A

0936P

'. WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION DATA (PART 1 - SPECIFICATIONS) 1.0 PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS Source and Intermediate Range Detect' ors WL-24157 and WL-24159 l.1 Electrical Requirements 1.1.1 Voltage Source: 300-2500 VDC Intermediate 300-1500 VDC

1.1.2 Frequency

N/A l.1.3 Load: N/A 1.1.4 Electromagnetic Interference: Per M11-N-199008

1.1.5 Other

None 1.2 Installation Requirements: W drawing 583F278 and applicable Source ar,d Intermediate Range Technical Manual 1.3 Auxiliary Devices: Source Range and Intermediate Range .

Drawers, Source Range Pre-amplifier , .

1.4 Preventative Maintenance Schedule: As a result of the completion of the qualification program, no maintenance is required to support the qualified life defined in Section 1.9.

1.5 Design Life: 5 years 1.6 Operating Cycles (Expected number of cycles during design life, including test): Continunus 2 -

0936P

'O w -

v l

1.7 Performanc legstrements for Function (CI(dI: Source and Intermediate Range Detectors Condition Containment DBE Post DOE Parameter Normal . Abnormal Test FLB/SLB IRA Seismic FLB/SLB LOCA Seismic .

1.7.1 Time requirement Continuous 12 hrs N/A N/A N/A Note a N/A N/A Continuous

1. 7. 2 Performance Note b Note b no desage; Note b requirement Note a.

1.8 Environmental Conditions for Same FunctionICI 1.8.1 Temperature ( *F)65-135 200 N/A N/A N/A M blent A4fent Conditions Conditions at 1.8.2 Pressure (psig) -0.1/+0.3 2 Atmospheric Atmospheric m M

1.8.3 Humidity (1 RH) 0 - 95 95 A-tient Ambient g cn 1.8.4 Radiattan (R) 2.2x109 None None None Z 6.3g10 17 @-

n/cm g w

1. 8. 5 Chemicals None None None Mc..e O 1.8.6 Vibration None None None None 1.8.7 Acceleration (g) None None . Figure 1 None* W Notes a: Detector required to fu;ction before and af ter a seismic event.

b: Accuracy + 5% If near full scale as measured at NIS output.

c: DBE is the Desig'n Basis Event. Margins are not included in the parameters specified in this section.

d: A separate set of Performance Requirements and Envisonmental Conditions are specified for Egsipment employed in dif ferent class IE functions.

m a _m-___ _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ ._

WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 1.9 Qualified Life: The currently demonstrat:d qualified life is 5 years based on the actual test conditions identified in Table 1.

1.10 Remarks: None O

e

  • l 0936P 4

- WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION DATA (PART 2 - QUALIFI:AT!3N BY TEST)-

2.0 TEST PLAN Environmental cycling was performed on the Source and Intermediate Range Excore Neutron Detector Assembly in the Westinghouse Industrial and Government Tube Division (WIGTD)' temperature and humidity chamber in Horseheads, New York. The portion of the chamber used.for this test was a 20 foot length of 8 inch schedule 40 stainless steel pipc. The ele-vated temperature was generated 'by heated oil. High humidity was achieved by adding water to the chamber and pressure was ad.iusted at dwell times using a high pressure air source. Reference 1 provides a more detailed description of the test facility.

Seismic tests were performed at the Westinghouse Advanced Energy Systerns Division (WAESD) Seismic Laboratory on the 8'x 8' Magnesium Table.

Reference 1 provides a more detailed description of the test facility.

2.1 Equipment

Description:

NIS Source and Intermediate Range Excore .

Neutron Detector Assembly i 2.2 Number Tested: type test on one-(1) each

2.3 Mounting

per Section 1.2

2.4 Connections

triax connectors for each unit tested 2.5 Aging Simulation Procedure 2.5.1 Thermal Aging: Thermal aging is covered under separate test programs as detailed in Reference 1. .

2.5.2 Mechanical Aging: N/A 2.5.3 Radiation Aging: Radiation aging is covered under separate ,

test programs as detailed in Reference 1.

2.5.4 Vibration Aging: :5 OBE's l

1 0936P 5 ,

i

-- _ _ _ . , .l

~

o y 2.6 Service Conditions to be simulated by testIII: Source /Intennediate Range Excore Neutron Detector Assembly Containment Nonnal Abnonnal Test Seismic HELB Post-HELB 2.6.1 Temp. (*F) 80* to 135'F 135* to 200*F N/A Ambient N/A N/A sixteen cycles four 24 hr.

cycles 2.6.2 Pressure (psig) 2 2 0 m

fG 2.6.3 Humidity (% RH) 95 95 , ,

Ambient ,

E 5

2.6.4 Radiation (R) None None None h n

E 2.6.5 Ch2micals None None None $

u 2.6.6 Vibration None None 5 OBE's 2.6.7 Acceleration-(g) None None TRS>RRS Figure 1 4

4 O

w

!- WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 2.7 Measured Variables for Source /Iatennediate Range Excore Neutron Detector Assembly Not'

! 2.7.1 Category I - Environment Required Required j 2.7.1.1 Temperature A B i

2.7.1.2 Pressure A B 2.7.1.3 Moisture - A B 2.7.1.4 Gas Composition A,B 2.7.1.5 Vibration B A 2.7.1.6 Time A,8 2.7.2 Category II - Input Electrical Characteristics 2.7.2.1 Voltage . A,B 2.7.2.2 Current A,B 2.7.2.3 Frequency A,B 2.7.2.4 Power A,8 -

2.7.2.5 Other A,8 l

2.7.3 Category III - Fluid Characteristics 2.7.3.1 Chemical Ccmposition A,B 2.7.3.2 Flow Rate A,B 2.7.3.3 Spray A,B 2.7.3.4 TE:aperature A,B l 2.7.4 Category IV - Radiological Features l

l

, 2.7.4.1 Energy Type - A,B l 2.7.4.2 Energy Level A,8 2.7.4.3 Dose Rate A,8

( 2.7.4.4 Integrated Dose A,B' l

l l

l 0936P 7

WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 2.7.5 Category V - Electrital Tharacteristics 2.7.5.1 Insulation Resistance A,B 2.7.5.2 Output Voltage A,B 2.7.5.3 Output Current A,B 2.7.5.4 Output Power A,8 2.7.5.5 Response Time A,B 2.7.5.6 Frequency Characteristics A,B 2.7.5.7 Simu~1ated Load A,B 2.7.6 Category VI - Mechanical Characteristics 2.7.6.1 Thrust A,B 2.7.6.2 Torque A,B 2.7.6.3 Time A,B 2.7.6.4 Load Profile __

A,8 2.7.7 Category VII - Auxiliary Equipment (List Function and Required Measurements) .

A: Operational Test', Normal and Abnormal Conditions B: Seismic Test l

8 0936P

i WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 l 2.8 Test SequInce Dreferred(2)  !

2.8.1 Inspection of Test Item 2.8.2 Operation (Nomal Condition) ~

2.8.3 Operation (Perfomance Specification Extremes, Section 1) 2.8.4 Simulated Aging (3) 2.8.5 VibrationI4) 2.8.6 Operation (Simulated H_igh Energy Line B_reak Conditions)(31 1 2.8.7 Operation (Simulated. Post }ELB Conditions')(3) i 2.8.8 Disassembly and Inspection l

2.9 Test Sequence Actual (2): Detectors Step Justification 2.8 1 2.6 2 ,

2.8 3 2.8 5 2.8 8 2.8 4 Aging uses separate test program - not sequential-2.8 6 ti/A - Detectors not required to operate during ,

2.8 7 N/A or after a IELB.

2.10 Type Test Data 2.10.1 Objective The objective of this test program is to demonstrate, employing the recommended practices of Reg. Guide 1.89 (IEEE-323-1974) and Reg. Guide 1.100 (IEEE 344-1975) the capability of the Boron Dilution Fix to com-i plete its safety related functions described in EQDP Section 1.7 while i exposed to the applicable environments defined in EQDP Section 1.8.

l

(

0936P 9

. WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 2.10.2 Equipmen Tested The testing was performed on type WL-23821 Source and Intermediate Range Detector Assembly, WL-23821, S/N-815201.

2.10.3 Features Demonstrated by the Test Testing demonstrated that the unit would function bu. during and after abnorcal service conditions. Reference 1 summar.. 'he results of environmental cycling.

The single design basis event considered is a seismic event since the detectors are not required to function during or after a HELB. The unit functioned properly before and after seismic excitation. Reference 1 summarizes the results of seismic tests. At the end of the test sequence, electrical tests, disa::sembly and inspection resulted in find-ing no significant degradation.-

The Source and Intermediate Range Detectors are not required to perform .

a function during or after a HELB. It is expected that the detectors would initially short when exposed to the HE'LB and eventually open. The shorting would be of no concern since the high voltage power supplies are current. limited and are not exposed to the HELB. Erratic _ operation may occur as some components may be damaged. The intermediate range compensating power supply is isolated from primary power by a transformer so failures in this area would be of no concern.

2.10.4 Test Procedures A number of performance measurements (known as acceptance tests i.e.,

resistances, leakage currents, capacitances, gamma sensitivity, gama compensation, neutron sensitivity, background test and thermal neutron sensitivity check) were carried out by Westinghouse IGTD during normal l- conditions; further detail is given in Reference 1. Simulated service conditions consisting of sixteen 80 to 135*F cycles, four 135' to 200*F (abnormal) cycles, seismic excitation and post environmental tests are 1

0936P 10

. WESTINGHOUSE CLASS'3

- . l all o tli ed in test procedures contained in Reference 1. The purpose l I

of the environmental cycling was to simulate the conditions experienced during 5 years of continuous service. Seismic testing consisted of a resonance search, five OBE's and four SSE's. The post seismic test procedure consisted of a repeat of electrical acceptance tests and disassembly and inspection as described in Reference 1.

2.10.5 Test Data and Accuracy '

All electrical test results obtained before and after each test sequence remained within specified acceptance limits. The Detector sensitivities were not expe:ted to change from the beginning to the end of the test program. Any variation within +5% were considered to be measurement error. The sensitivities of the proportional counter and compensated sonization chamber after the seismic event were within 5% (which is measurement error) of the original sensitivity measurements. Test data met the normai acceptance Ifmits except for a portion during envi-ronmental cycling that was not considered to have a significant effect upon operation. A su.m ry of test data and accuracy. discussion can be .

found in Reference 1. , ,

2.10.6 Conclusions The results of environmental cycling and seismic testing described herein and reported in Reference 1, demonstrate the qualification of the Source and Intermediate Range Excore Neutron Detector Assembly employing the practices recomended by Regulatory Guide 1.89 and 1.100.

2.10.7 References

1. Riling, R. W., Chang, S-M., " Equipment Qualification T.est Report, Source / Intermediate Excore Neutron Detector" WCAP-8687, Supplement 2-E47A (Proprietary).

l ll 0936P

~

- ' WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3  ;

2 11 Part 2 Notes (1) The generic tests conducted by Westinghouse employ parameters designed to envelope a number of plant applications. Margin will be demonstrated on future plant applications by comparison of the generic Westinghouse qualification parameters to plant specific parameters.

(2) Paragraph 2.8 shows the preferred test ssquence as specified in IEEE-323-74. The actual sequence employed is shown in paragraph 2.9 including justification for any deviations from the preferred.

(3) Radiation dose from normal operation and HELB may be com-bined. If combined, HELB and post-HELB conditions need not include radiation.

(4) Simulated seismic and other vibration seen in service.

9 0

l 0936P 12 i

- s . --

- WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 PART 3 AND 4 QUALIFICATION BY EXPERIENCE AND OR ANALYSIS i

WESTINGHOUSE DOES NOT EMPLOY OPERATING EXPERIENCE OR ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF THE QUALIFICATION PROGRAM FOR THE SOURCE AND INTEREDIATE RANGE NEUTRON DETECTOR ASSEMBLY.

O e

i .

1 M e- .

g f WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 5% Damping 100.0 . . . . _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _ . . . _ _ _ . . . . . _ . .

. . . _ . __4 _ . _ _ , . --i--.-'

.. . . . .. -  : _ - 4_' _4 % q_ -4..++ e 9-'::il.:E GE - .i-d sNNN-i _' Y i f $ .. .4

~

~~ l' l f I .-i-

- - - = y-1 .= =._:= v-- :.= p: ~.* ..'

. .. . .c I .r

.* .:f- ~i .8- t. :-_:- .: _ _ _ ._ =, -- - - - ,-

. ~ -.=- - --

', . . . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ , m, . , . _ - ..._m. . ; ,

P

i '..I .T:Eh.).M= -- ~O M' ._ CTP T :*!

, I .i 4 ,: ..f pJ #4

. . . *: - .M.]Q_ L'*_

-3@ .] hM b - --f_."_*h. NY:1 ~]

  • s p.2_ . . . : _.;-- - - - m ..u.  : s :1:t: ,1

-'_ I - 2 ***-1* * ** -

  • m "-** f __ _ 2. .

. . . s.-- =t- . . 23 l -- - - M =- . . - n :.:.:-- u*. 2 ..

-"i"""*

'-'.: 4:.'.~.:*. 1 4 .1:1 2 -~ -' ' , .e - .: i.. A .

-- . r.- .1:* 12 _ ..  : .a -ct-__-P .: : .

d ,-

.. . 4'

~_. .a y . 4.

t - t, . . *4=-_.,t -6 . .

y

)O.C J.. r . . _ .__1....._..4.. __..=.!. . -4

.. -- ; _ .,. i . 2 .

[

.. _ . ... _... . 4 4 .._. _..~..4...-.

-- . . _ _ . . , ,_ m _ , _ . . . . , _ _ _ _ , . . .

4 . . .i. . ;n. .g;.4 g. g .p . .hq...; ._ g.._ .

-g ~ ' :*~j 9i .-i i ~ [.fj#~ .-TI: :- '-j -[- .Ggy_MQ .][_@-j; j ;i .

8

.3 ,.=

. . ...,: ... .,. u ._. .. : 1 . . .. _. _ _=. _= . . :=. .._. . ._; u. r m._.r.{.__:.=.__ ..._. ..

_ . , _._ L._ .y4. ,_ . . . . ...... . .

.o . .e, :.-t -i : t . t. i .

-;. ... - . ,=. e.... _u p.._=.i -._;__ -

. ... i.. ..+-i- _ _- .c. 4 : .. =ii. =. a. t 3* '

+ " 3.i0 .*i / N 5 5 E:h 5j'N I.N:li.I=~ ds5M ~!@ -i  ;

.u: .p: r. n

._;. .. . n ..:.y . . . i _: ,p.- . . _ _ .

c r 3_ . ==:

-M -- - - --- 4 :4----* . . :- :. . . . : .

=

u tu t4 T.: *

+ .

s -- .

. - _1 3  ;,a . . . . . . ..........._q ,._ _ - i > .

__4. 1 ,. . ! .

q ,

_ _ . . . . . . , . . 4 ._...__......_..,.u__._. - _ _ . _ . . ..

' e 4 .. . . , ., ^

....4.... . . _ . . .- ., _6 . .

. 9 2

. . . . . . . . ...4.,. ...m.--._, u -..

4 .. .

t

--- :. :(-  : . } . .i H j p : .j == . . _ F-i. .-_ :-59_91 t ?-5:i_%:t.-M. _. l@: _- - l --

r

. .i '

..( '.*l . ) f . l 4 *; .J. a*. ;3 '-- " : :./

. J =:O:.- . h_. . .) * -. ) . . l 1.

i 8

. . . . . . . .g..____,__.. ._

.n;.;. 3
: -. . . _ . __.- . m ._p ._. . - _4_ .__ __ ..h.- .:&- . .._..... ~ .. .,g 7 ' . .t - g -

4 t .__ . m _ .

3 t .t . -l.i.h .

' !c = + :-

. . . =. .: _+ . : . ;,

~

~'

2 Mii - ,I d-h hs NNi5 5-t@!S P'_-- I 5 'F: ~ -

i

'.}. .

-.__. . < ..I

__  : . . ..i..3..r . ::..._.. .. .,: -. . -- - -' - " * - -. _ . . . . . . . I '

. __. . . .l_ _.: l ;. 4_ _

t_.._;_ _m. . ;.t;.,. .".! t ,

i .. .

. . . . . .. 6 . . , . _ . _ __._ __ .._. . . , ,,

I,!.,

. . . + .,.. . . _ . . . . _ .. -

. . , . . . ....e . , . i . - - -

. . . . p' O 10 0 100 0 Frequency (Hz) .-

1 Fiaure 1: Required Response Spectrum Alona't'e n 14orizontal Control Axis (SSE)

J l

l 0936P 15

TABLE 1 '

ACTUAL QUALIFICATION TEST CONDITIONS t

EQUIPENT (1) LOCATION QUAL '

MANUFACTURER ABNORMAL / ACCIDENT ENVIRONENTAL EXTREES OPERABILITY ACCURACY (1) QUAL QUAL QUAL PROGRAM SYSTEM / CATEGORY STRUCTURE / AREA T YPE/MODEL PARAE TER ,

SPECIFIED (2) QUALIFIED reg DEM E REQ DEM LIFE ETHOD REF STATUS '

SOURCE / INTER- Containment W-lGTD Temperature 200*F Remain Remain -+5%

EDIATE Bldg / Detector E -24157 Pressure 2 psig -+51 5 yrs. Sequen- E47A Completed Func-Func- tial RANGE EXCORE Well E-24159 Relative 951 - tional t;onal NEUTRON HumfdIty(1) test DETECTOR Radfat1on 9 .

2.2x10 y i Chemistry 6.3x10 II

' n/cm2 Acceleration Ffgure 1-g '

Q

$ i g 8  ;

NOTES:

M -

p 1.

For defintt fon of the category letters, >

Equipment," Appendix E. Sectton 2. refer to NUREG 0588 "Interfu Staff. Posit fon on Envfronmental Qualif feat fon of Safety-Related Electrfeal M

2. Plant specific environmental parameters are to be Inserted by the appifcant.

to f

G 4

-w.

l l

SNUPPS Interim Justification Position for the Seismic Qualification of the TC/CCM Systen (ESE-56A) e l

Background

The SNUPPS Thermocouple / Core Cooling Monitor System (TC/CCM) comprises two identical microprocessor-based monitoring assemblies or trains, each monitoring various analog and digital inputs, performing calculations using the information obtained from the inputs, and actuating caution or alarm outputs when preset trip points are exceeded. Each provides relay contact outputs for caution and alarm conditions, along with serial data outputs, to j the Technical Support Center (TSC), digital and analog recorders, and a remote digital display. The local and remote control panels have lamps that indicate POWER on; processor RUN, STOP; and system status (NORMAL, CAUTION, and ALARM) conditions. Switches on both the local and remote control panels reset the central processing unit (CPU) and acknowledge alarm or caution outputs. In addition, there are controls for selecting display format and content and, on -

the local control panel, for testing the system, adjusting setpoints for cautions and alarms, and activating or deactivating selected inputs. ,' '

The upper six ifnes of the remote digital display unit are allocated for .

thermocouple, RTD and pressure data, and the lower two lines are f,or, core cooling data. Alarm and caution outputs and indications are shared by both functions. If one alarm or caution is ictive and a second alarm or caution condition occurs, the appropriate relay will cycle and, if the plant annunciator system has the capability, alarm or caution signals will be reflashed to ind1cate the new alarm or caution condition.

The TC/CCM enables the plant operator to activate necessary manual safety functions following a Condition II, III, or IV event. These safety measures include providing information needed to maintain. the plant in a safe shutdown

condition, or to proceed to a cold shutdown, consistent with the Technical Specification limits. .

Previous Environmental Testing (This equipment is located in mild environment areas of the SNUPPS plants)

The TC/CCM system has been subjected to the complete IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1975 qualification testing. The TC/CCM system successfully passed -

temperature and humidity testing and seismic testing. Aging simulation is I

l ,

L

addressed in a separate program, as described by Subprogram C of Appendix B to .

~

WCAP 8587, currently in progress.

The specific parameters of tests already conducted are as listed below:

Temperature / Humidity Testing:' Two twelve hour cycles at 120*F, 35% RH Two twelve hour cycles at 82*F, 95% RH Seismic Testing: Tested per IEEE 344-1975 requirementswithoperabblity demonstrated before and after each SSE.

TC/CCM Cabinet Electronics:

Current Status: Data is being reviewed; accuracies are being calculated.

Repeatability of the data is acceptable. During seismic - -

testing the requirement was for all equipment to function properly before and after each SSE. '

Remote Digital Display: (See ESE-46A) 4 No failures occurred during temperature / humidity testing and seismic SSE test runs in positions 1 and 2. During position 3, a vertical column on the plasma display blanked out and another vertical column became intermittent. During position 4, ar,other vertical column blanked out. This condition continued to exist after the testing had ended and also during subsequent operation of the display.

The display was removed from its panel and sent to the original manufacturer for checkout, test and evaluation. Upon energizing the disp. lay the manufacturer reported that the display operated properly with all columns working. The display was then disassembled in an attempt to identify a cause ,

for its intermittent operation. They concluded that certain vibration modes cause fretting of the edge connector contacts and board edge fingers. The fretting produces microscopic particles of oxidized material that act as.a

. 6

l l

1

! insulator, thereby causing intermittent or open circuits. Based on the nature -  ;

of the failure which occurred during the third SSE, the testing provides sufficient evidence that the plasma display vould perform properly during one SSE. However, to provide additional margin, the manufacturer is developing a lubricant / oxidation inhibitor which would minimize the fretting and also minimize any fretted material from becoming an insulator. If appropriate, this inhibitor will be incorporated into the SNUPPS desig~n.

One additional problem occurred with the PS-2 power supply. Its performance was satisfactory during all seismic testing, however, its output became intermittent at high temperatures during the temperature testing. Further i

testing is scheduled; however, for SNUPPS this system is in the control room which has Class 1E HVAC and will not experience an abnormal environment.

TC/CCit Digital Printer (See ESE-46B) l No failures occurred during testing. The printer functioned properly l throughout with acceptable legibility and accuracy. .

Test Schedule ,

s. .

Testing is scheduled for completion, including the submission of the test report by July, 1984.

. \

l l

l

I 1

4 SNUPPS Interim Justification Position for the Seismic Qualification of the Target Rock Head Vent System Control Module (HE-108)

(A draft copy of EQDP-HE-10B is attached in lieu of analysis; the report meets all requirements for supporting qualification of the Head Vent System Electronic Control Module. This equipment is located in a mild environment area). .

o

  • e e

.