ML20098G629
| ML20098G629 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 09/30/1984 |
| From: | Rahe E WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19277H871 | List: |
| References | |
| EQDP-ESE-3C, WCAP-8587S1R-ESE-3C, WCAP-8587S1R0-ESE-3C, NUDOCS 8410050241 | |
| Download: ML20098G629 (14) | |
Text
'i
[. .* '
WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 EQDP-ESE-3C Rev. O, 9/84 EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION DATA PACKAGE This document contains information, relative to the qualification of the equipment identified below in accordance with the methodology of WCAP-8587. The Specification section (Part 1) defines the assumed limits for the equipment qualification and constitute interface require ments to the user.
Tobar Differential Pressure Transmitters (Group A)
M APPROVED: N bO 8 "#
' yn .P Rahe, Nanager ear Safety Department WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION NUCLEAR ENERGY SYSTENS PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15230 8410050241 041002 DR ADOCK 05000482 PDR 7792Q
WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 SECTION 1 - SPECIFICATIONS 1.0 PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS 1.1 Electrical Requirements 1.1.1- Voltage: 20 - 45 VDC i IV 1.1. 2 Frequency: N/A 1.1.3 Load: 4 - 20 MA 1.1.4 Electromagnetic Interference: None
1.1.5 Other
None 1.2 Installation Requirements: Wall mounted per Westinghause Drawing 8765069 1.3 Auxiliary Devices: None 1.4 Preventive Maintenance Schedule: Per the Westinghouse Equipment .
Qualification test program, the maintenance required to maintain the qualified life stated in Section 1.9 is that the cover 0-ring must be replaced each time the cover is removed. This does not preclude development of preventive maintenance program designed to enhance -
equipment performance and identify unanticipated equipment degradation as long as this program does not compromise the qualification status of the equipment. Surveillance activities may also be considered to support the basis for, and a possible extension of, the qualified life.
1.5 Design Life: 40 years 1.6 Operating Cycles (Expected number of cycles during design life, including test): Continuous duty.
7792Q 1
4 1.7 Performance Requirements for Functio.'. (b): Pressurizer Level Containment D8L ConditionsI "I Post DBE Condition],(a) y Normal Abnormal Test c
Parameter Conditions Conditions Conditions FL8/SLB (QCJ Seismic FLB /SLB LOCA Seismic 1.7.1 Time requirement Continuous Included Test Event Event Event 4 months 4 months Continuous under normal Duration Duration Durat. Duration 1.7.2 Performance (c) i 15 Included No damage i 16% i 16% i 115 1 161 1 lb1 1 15 requirement (d) 0.4 Sec under normal 10 secs. 10 secs. 0.4 secs. 10 secs 10 secs 0.4 secs 1.8 Envirornental Conditions for Same Function (b) 1.8.1 Temperature (*F) 50 - 120 Included Am lent Figure 2 Figure 3 Ambient Figure 2 Figure 3 Asetent under normal M 1.8.2 Pressure (psig) -0.1/+0.3 Included 70 Figure 2 FigLre 2 Figure 3 0 Figure 3 0 N ur. der normel 1.8.3 humidity (1 RH) 0 - 95 Included Ambient 100 100 Ambient 100 100 Aa61ent g under normal C 4
m 1 8.4 Radiation (R) < 10 Included None included Included None 3.9x10"Y 4.1x10 TI None under normal 5 8 under Under 6.4x10 8 9x10 8 S Post DBE Post 08E 1.8.5 ca Chemicals None Included None Figure 2 Figure 3 None Figure 2 Figure 3 None under normal 1.8.6 Vibration None Included None None None Mone None None None undtr normal 1.8.7 Acceleratton (g) None Included None None None Figures None None None under nomal 1 A 18,1C Notes: (a) DBE is the Design Basis Event,
, (b) Margin is not included tw the parameters of this section.
(c) Reference accuracy specified. W1ues shown for accuracy under D8E and Post D8E conditions include i 17 for normal conditions which is not part of the D8E induced of fects.
(d) Time Response (e) Continued operation required, no specified accuracy or time response.
^--.tr o
1.7 Performance seguirements for Function (b): Steam Generator Water Level (NR) ' ~
Containment D8E Conditions (a) Post DSE Conditions (a) y Normal Abnormal Test u> ggrameter conditions Conditions Conditions [L1 LOCA/SLB Seismic FLB/SLB L9L& Seismic o
1.7.1 Time requirement Continuous Included Test < 5 min Event Event 4 months 4 months Continuot.s under norinal Duration Duration Saration 1.1.2 Performance (c) i 15 Included No damage i 115 1 161 1 115 1 165 1 165 1 15 requirement (d) 0.4 sec under normal 0.4 secs. 10 secs. 0.4 secs. 10 se.s 10 secs 0.4 secs 1.s Env1 onnental Conditions for Same Function (b) 1.8.1 lemperature (*F) 53 - 120 Included Ambient Figure 2 Figure 2/3 Ambient Figure 2 Figure 3
' Ambient b
under normai N
1.8.2 Pressure (pstg) 4.1/'O.3 Included 70 Figure 2 Figure 2/3 0 Figure 2 Figure 3 0 E
cn under normal b C
1.8.3 Humidity (E RH) 0 - g5 Included Ambient 100 100 Ambient 100 100 Ambient jq w under normal 1.8.4 n Radiation (R) < 10" Included 4.1x107T
^
under normal None InCiv4ed Included None Under Post Under Post 3.9x10*Y 5
6.4x10 8 gx10 88 None
{
cn DSE DRE ca i
l 1.8.5 Chemicals none included None Figure 2 Figure 2/3 None Figure 2 Figure 3 None a
) unJer morinal j 1.8.6 Vibration hone Included None None None None None None None i unJer normal 1.8.7 Acceleration (g) None Included Noce None None Figures None None None under norinal 1A,1B,1C Notes: (a) DBE is the Design Basis Event (b) Margin is not included in the parameters of this section.
(c) Reference accuracy specified. Values shown for accuracy under DGE and Post OSE conditions include i 11 for norinal conditions which is not part of the DOE induced offact.
(d) Time Response
WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 0 .
l .
1.9 Qualified Life: The currently demonstrated qualified life is ten years (10 yrs.) based on an average ambient temperature of 40*C (104*F). The demonstrated qualified life based on an average ambient temperature of 120*F is six years (6 yrs.).
1.10 Remarks: Beta dose only applicable to transmitter seals 77920 4
m-WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 SECTION 2 - EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION DATA i 2.1 QUALIFICATION PLAN i
The qualification of the Tobar Model 320P1 Differential Pressure Transmitter i (Group A) is based on a combination of analysis and testing. 'The testing was l performed on a Veritrak Model 76DP2 Differential Pressure Transmitter and is described in Reference 2. The analysis is described in Section 4 of this report and in Reference 1.
Complete qualification testing was performed on the Veritrak Model 760P2 to simulate the following conditions:
Thermal Aging l Radiation Environment Containment Pressure Seismic Environment High Energy Line Break (HEL8)
Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) l A similarity analysis, described in Section 4, was performed in an effort to extend qualification to the Tobar Model 320P1.
I t
1 77920 5
I WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 e .
SECTION 3 00ALIFICATION BY EXPERIENCE Westinghouse does not employ operating experience in support of the qualification program for the Tobar Group A Differential Pressure Transmitter.
7792Q 6
I WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 SECTION 4 OVALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS 4.1 COM8INED ANALYSIS AND TEST APPROACH Westinghouse does not employ methods which rely solely upon analysis in their qualification programs. In the qualification program for the Tobar Model 32DP1 Differential Pressure Transmitter a combined test and analysis approach was taken.
Testing was performed on the Veritrak Model 76DP2 Differential Pressure Transmitter and documented in Reference 2.
4.2 ANALYSIS A similarity analysis was perforned to establish qualification for the following conditions:
Thermal Aging Radiation Environment Containment Pressure Seismic Environment High Energy Line Break (HELB)
Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA)
'The two-phase analysis consisted of:
- 1. A rigorous review of drawings for both the Tobar model and the Veritrak qualification unit. Any differences founc between the Tobar Model 320P1 and the Veritrak Model 76DP2 qualification unit were noted and investigated.
- 2. A review of design changes which may have been implemented on the Tobar Model 32DPI but not on the Veritrak Model 76DP2 qualification unit.
77920 7
WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 The sir.ilarity analysis results showed no differences between the Tobar model and the Veritrak qualification unit which would result in performance outside of the specifications given in Section 1.7 for the conditions given above.
4.3 CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the similarity analysis (Reference 1) comparing the Tobar Model 320P1 with the Veritrak Model 76DP2 which was tested and qualified (Reference 2), it is concluded that the Tobar model will perform its required safety functions in an equivalent manner to the veritrak Model under the conditions described in Section 1.7.
Description Model W Drawing Number Differential Pressure Transmitter 32DP1 8765D69/6
4.4 REFERENCES
- 1. Shubert, J. J., " Equipment Qualification Analysis Report, Tobar Differential Pressure Transmitters - Group A", WCAP-8687, Supp. 2-E03C.
- 2. Skeers, D. M., Drost, P. S. , Black, J. P. , Rygg, D. E., " Equipment Qualification Test Report, Veritrak Differential Pressure Transmitters -
Group A", WCAP-8687, Suop. 2-E038.
7792Q 8
WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 10456-3 l
100.0 8
6 4
2 10.0 3 8 2 6 # A o s' \
E , / 1 g i
/ '
i O 2 1.0 8
6 4
2 0.1 0.1 2 4 6 8 1.0 2 4 6 8 10.0 2 4 6 8 100.0 FREQUENCY (H2)
Figure 1 A. Required Response Spectrum (RRS) for Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE)
(Input A) Along the Principal Axis 7792Q 9
WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 l
l . .
10456-1 100.0 8
6 4
2 10.0 8 _
6 r i 3 7 g 5 4 / \
h I 7 5 '
d 2 \
l 1.0 8
6 4
2 0.1 0.1 2 4 6 8 1.0 2 4 6 8 10.0 2 4 6 8 100.0 FREQUENCY (HZ)
Figure 10. Required Response Spectrum (RRS) for Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE)
(Input B) Along the Principal Axis 7792Q 10
I'.
i WESTINGHOUS'l Ct. ASS 3 l
.c l
t c456-2 100.0 8 I 6
4 2
10.0 3 8 2 g I \
9 / \
E 4 / \
$ / h d r y2 1.0 8
6 4
2 0.1 0.1 2 4 6 8 1.0 2 4 6 8 10.0 2 4 6 8 100.0 FREQUENCY (H2)
FigureIC. Required Response Snectrum (R RS) for Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SS'd)
(input C) Along the Principal Axis 7792Q 11
i.
i
.f CESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 h~ * .*
1053S1 180 300 500 70 450 -
60 400 -
u.
] -
50 9
E 3
350 -
40 $
w k
cc 3
g 300 -
30 h
?u !E H
- 25G -
20 200 - 10 150 !
0 100 10 1 10 2 10 3 104 10 5 10 6
107 10 8 TIME (SECONDS) 3.15 x 107 1 YEAR Figuro 2: Required HELB Profile 7792Q 12
WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 10539 2 200 300 2000 350 70 300 -
60 250 -
50 E
- ~ 6 vi E 200 -
40 E 3 ua k en
,5 150 30 h'
t-100 20 50 - 10 NOTE A : O O I ! ! ! I O
10 0 3 10 1 10 2 10 104 10 5 10 6 107 10 8 TIME (SECONDS) 3.15 x 107 1 YEAR NOTE A: INITIAL 24 HOUR CONTAINMENT SPRAY SOLUTION OF 2500 ppm BORON WITH 0.24% NaOH Figure 3: Required LOCA Profile 7792Q 13
_ . . . .. -_