Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
Results
Other: A830006, Identifies Proprietary Portions of Technical Evaluation Repts Re Safety Evaluation for Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment,Per NRC, A830007, Comments on SER & Technical Evaluation Rept for Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment Exposed to Harsh Environs,Per IE Bulletin 79-01B.Continued Safe Operation of Facility Reasonably Assured, A830014, Responds to 10CFR50.49(g), Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants & NRC Requests.List of Equipment Important to Safety Encl, ML20010G270, ML20084H473, ML20107F870
|
MONTHYEARML20004E0271981-06-0808 June 1981 Safety Evaluation Re Environ Qualification of safety- Related Electrical Equipment.No Equipment Requiring Immediate Corrective Action Identified Project stage: Approval ML20004E0241981-06-0808 June 1981 Forwards Safety Evaluation & Technical Evaluation Rept Re Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment.Requested Info Should Be Provided within 90 Days Project stage: Approval ML20010G2701981-09-0404 September 1981 Forwards Revision 2 to 801031 Response to IE Bulletin 79-01B, Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment, as 90-day Response to NRC 810608 Safety Evaluation on Same Subj.All Concerns Addressed,Will Not Be Resolved by 820630 Project stage: Other ML20041D8851982-02-22022 February 1982 Forwards Request for Addl Info Per Response to Safety Evaluation Re Environ Qualification of TMI Action Plan Installed Equipment Project stage: Approval ML20028C0211982-12-20020 December 1982 Forwards SER & Proprietary & Nonproprietary Review of Licensees Resolution of Outstanding Issues from NRC Equipment Environ Qualification SERs (F-11 & B-60). Proprietary Version Withheld Project stage: Approval ML20028C0281982-12-20020 December 1982 Safety Evaluation Re Environ Qualification of safety-related Electric Equipment.Licensee Must Provide Plans for Qualification or Replacement of Unqualified Equipment & Schedule for Proposed Corrective Action Project stage: Approval A830006, Identifies Proprietary Portions of Technical Evaluation Repts Re Safety Evaluation for Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment,Per NRC1983-01-17017 January 1983 Identifies Proprietary Portions of Technical Evaluation Repts Re Safety Evaluation for Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment,Per NRC Project stage: Other A830007, Comments on SER & Technical Evaluation Rept for Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment Exposed to Harsh Environs,Per IE Bulletin 79-01B.Continued Safe Operation of Facility Reasonably Assured1983-01-24024 January 1983 Comments on SER & Technical Evaluation Rept for Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment Exposed to Harsh Environs,Per IE Bulletin 79-01B.Continued Safe Operation of Facility Reasonably Assured Project stage: Other A830014, Responds to 10CFR50.49(g), Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants & NRC Requests.List of Equipment Important to Safety Encl1983-05-20020 May 1983 Responds to 10CFR50.49(g), Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants & NRC Requests.List of Equipment Important to Safety Encl Project stage: Other ML20151H8891983-10-0303 October 1983 Exemption from Schedular Requirements of 10CFR50.49 Re Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment Project stage: Approval ML20084H4731984-03-22022 March 1984 Discusses Determination of Equipment within Scope of 10CFR50.49(b)(2).Components Added & Removed as Result of Internal Reviews by CNS Plant Engineering,Consultants & Further Engineering Studies Project stage: Other NLS8400127, Forwards Addl Info Resolving Open Items of SER Re Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment. Proposed Resolution of Deficiencies Discussed During 840329 Meeting W/Nrc.Issuance of Sser Requested1984-04-24024 April 1984 Forwards Addl Info Resolving Open Items of SER Re Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment. Proposed Resolution of Deficiencies Discussed During 840329 Meeting W/Nrc.Issuance of Sser Requested Project stage: Meeting ML20101M5881984-12-26026 December 1984 Responds to 841106 Request for Confirmation of Environ Qualification Justification for Continued Operation. Expenditure of Funds & Engineering Resources for Confirmation Unnecessary Because Plant in Major Outage Project stage: Request ML20107F8701985-02-15015 February 1985 Requests Extension of Deadline to 851130 for Environ Qualification of Electric Equipment,Per Generic Ltr 84-24. Delay Due to Lack of Vendor Documentation for Rewound Drive Motors.Justification for Continued Operation Encl Project stage: Other ML20215G3871986-10-0909 October 1986 Confirms Dates for Equipment Qualification Insp on 861027-31.Mgt Entrance Meeting Scheduled for 861027,plant Walkdown Insp of Equipment Planned for 861030 & Mgt Exit Meeting Tentatively Scheduled for 861031 Project stage: Meeting ML20215L1081986-10-20020 October 1986 Confirms Discussion Between J Jaudon,Re Ireland & G Horn Changing Dates of Equipment Qualification Insp at Plant from 861027-31 to 861103-07.Mgt Exit Meeting Tentatively Scheduled for 861107 at Plant Site Project stage: Meeting 1983-10-03
[Table View] |
Text
.
GENERAL OFFICE j
j Nebraska Public Power District
"5 March 22,1984 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Operating Reactors Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Attention : Mr. Domenic B. Vassallo, Chief
Reference:
1.
Letter from H. R. Denton to All Operating Light Water Reactors, September 17, 1979 2.
Letter from J. M. Pilant to H. R. Denton, October 8,1979 3.
Letter from J. M. Pilant to D. B. Vassallo dated May 20, 1983
Dear Mr. Vassallo:
Subject:
Determination of Equipment Within the Scope of 10CFR50.49(b)(2)
Paragraph (b)(2) of 10CFR50.49 requires that licensees identify "Nonsafety-related electric equipment whose failure under postulated environmental conditions could prevent satisfactory accomplishment of safety-functions..."
The District originally performed this analysis with the results documented in Reference 2.
However, several new analyses and evaluations have been performed since that time.
Therefore, the previous assessment has been modified to include the impact of a revised HELB study, and the further equipment requirements identified in I.E. Bulletin 79-01B,10CFR50.49, and Reg. Guide 1.97.
The re-evaluation was performed using the following methodology to identify the subject equipment:
1.
A list was generated of safety-related electric equipment as defined in Paragraph (b)(1) of 10CFR50.49 required to remain functional during or following design-basis Loss ot' Coolant Accident (LOCA) or High Energy Line Break (IIELB) accidents.
The LOCA/HELB accidents are the only design-basis accidents which result in significantly adverse environments to electrical equipmcat which is required for sate shutdown or accident mitigation.
This li.st was based S # l N 8405080072 840322 PDR ADOCK 05000298
\\ b P
PDR
\\
4 Page 2 March 22,1984 on reviews of the Piping and Instrument Diagrams (PAID's),
Electrical Elementary Diagrams, and Electrical Distribution Diagrama.
2.
The elementary wiring diagrams of the safety-related electrical equipment identified in Step 1 were then reviewed to identify any auxiliary devices electrically connected directly into the control or power circuitry of the safety-related equipment (e.g.,
automatic trips) whose failure due to postulated environmental conditions could prevent the required operation of the safety-related equipment.
3.
N ext, the operation of the safety-related systems and equipment were reviewed to identify any directly mechanically connected auxiliary systems with electrical components which are necessary for the required operation of the safety-related equipment (e.g.,
cooling water or lubricating systems).
4.
Finally, the nonsafety-related electrical circuits indirectly associated with the electrical equipment identified in Step 1 by common power supply or physical proximity were considered by a review of the original Cooper Station electrical design.
The systems and equipment generated in Steps 2, 3, and 4 above were then compared to the " Master List of Electrical Equipment at Cooper Nuclear Station for 10CFR50.49" dated '
May 20, 1983, Reference 3.
Components have been added and removed as a result of internal reviews by CNS Plant Engineering, consultants, and further engineering studies.
All of the added equipment was determined to meet the classification of paragraph (b)(1) of 10CFR50.49.
No additional equipment was found to be applicable to (b)(2) of 10CFR50.49.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact my office.
Sincerely, W.
.1. Pilant i.
Technical Staff Manager Nuclear Power Group JMP/kew:cm::20 /4
=
is c : ::RC Distributien E. M. Mace R.
H chne"
- 5. J. Jobe
..~ a c h a
.s.
.