ML20080B449
| ML20080B449 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 12/12/1983 |
| From: | Lucks A STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| To: | Cook R NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20080B405 | List: |
| References | |
| 14358, NUDOCS 8402070144 | |
| Download: ML20080B449 (16) | |
Text
.
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC, /P9f f ricq 5targ LA 'gpaz q
J.
I P.O. Box 2325. BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS O2107 1[/*
f zy
- C
..: A 12
'.d y gh h-h,F-.
ri;9 43
_}
December 12, 1983 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Midland Site Resident Office J. O. No. 14358 Route 7, Ref. MPF 64 Midland, MI. 48640 Attention:
Mr.
R.
Cook DOCKET NO. 50-339/330 MIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF UNDERPINNING REPORT NO. 64 A copy of the Independent Assessment of Underpinning 'o'eekly Report No.64 10, 1983 is enclosed for the period of December 4, 1983 through DecemberIncluded as attachments are the m with this letter.
meetings held during the week between members of the Assessment Team and Site Engineering, Construction, and Quality Assurance personnel.
If you have any questions with respect to this report please contact me at (627) 589-2067.
- b-fow A. Stanley Lucks Project Manager Enclosures ASL/pd h2 44 840203 G
K 05000329 PDR
I t
l J
O. No. 14358 Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Independent Assessment of Underpinning Weekly Report No. 64 December 4, 1983 through December 10, 1983 Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.
W.
Kilker 12/4 - 12/8 J. ' Springer 12/4 - 12/6 L.
Rouen 12/4 - 12/6 P.
Majeski 12/6 - 12/10 B.
Holsinger 12/6 - 12/10 S.
Lucks 12/5,12/6,12/8 W.
Craig 12/5 - 12/8 Meetings Attended Date Represented Purpose 12/5-12/7,12/9 Stone & Webster Daily Assessment Bechtel Team Meeting Consumers Power 12/6 Stone & Webster
-Ascessment Team Meeting MPQAD with MPQAD 12/8 NRC Monthly Meeting Consumers Power with NRC Stone & Webster Underpinhing and Remedial Soils Activities - Construction The Stop Work Order issued October 21, 1983 continued in effect throughout the week.
Assessment Team - Observations The Contractor provided responses to the five recommendations contained in the Assessment Team's report entitled " Evaluation of Change and Nonconformance Documents," durios the Daily Meeting on December 6, 1983 The responses are comprehensive and fully address the issues brought forward in the report.
Since implementation of the response activities is ongoing, the Assessment Team will continue to monitor these items.
The Team received a status of the activities associated with the upgrading of the administrative functions at US Testing.
Based upon this update, it appears that all problem areas will be corrected by the beginning of the coming year.
2 J. O. No. 14358 Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Independent Assessment of Underpinning Work Activity Packages The following is a listing of the Work Activity Packages that are in the open response stage, or have been completed in the past week.
WAP No.
Title Status 69 SWPS Piers 1 & 1A Open Excavation and Soil Load Test Open 71 SWPS-Thru Anchor Bolt Holes 73 Train-B Service Open Water Pipe Replace-ment Nonconformance Identification Reports NIR No.
Description Date (Opened) (Closed) 16 Crack Monitoring 11/4/83 Procedure 17 FCR/FCN Review 11/15/83 12/6/83 Program 18 Crack Monitoring 11/17/83 Program 19 QA/QC Review of 11/22/83 Crack Mapping Data 20 Concrete Admixture 12/1/83 Dispenser Calibration Open Items Items discussed during meetings are categorized as follows:
OPEN ITEM - An item for which an action is required. The item will remain open until the required action has been taken. Tracking is required.
CLOSED ITEM - An item, usually brought' forward by the Assessment Team, that is discussed and adequately responded to.
No tracking is required.
6
3 l
J. O. No. 14358 Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Independent Assessment of Underpinning INFORMATION ITEM - An item, brought forward to provide general background information regarding work, such as work status or an upcoming design change. No tracking is required.
OPINION ITEM - An opinion or suggestion, given by the Assessment Team, expressing an alternate construction or quality assurance technique. 'The opinion or suggestion is given as a possible alternate that may facilitate an operation. No response or implementation is required as a result of an Opinion Item.
CLOSES ITEM -XX-XX - This notation identifies an action that closes a previously identified open ites. Tracking of the open item stops.
'ihe following is a listing of all open items from the Daily Meeting Notes with Becthel and the Weekly Meeting with MPQAD. Carry-over items from past weeks which have been Closed this week, are also listed.
Item No.
Description Closure WR 51, pg. 2 FCR Final Approval 64-13 Process WR 54, pg. 3 Weld Tech Sheets Open 57-17 Wall Ties open 57-6Q MPQAD Supervisory Open Personnel WR 58, pg. 2 Lack of Drawing Open Reference 58-3 Tubular Steel open Lagging 59-5 Additional SWPS 64-6 Cracks WR 60, pg. 2 Inspection of Non-Open Structural Welds 60-4 WJE Procedure Open 62-4Q MPQAD Review of Crack 64-4Q Monitoring 63-11 Change Document Evaluation 64-7 to 64-11 Peport Meeting
k J. O. No. 14358 Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Independent Assessment of Underpinning Item No.
Description Closure 64-7 QAP Review Pro 5 ram Open 64-9 FCR/FCN Processing Open 64-10 Trend Analysis Open r'
W W' Cov Ws silkeu h W' Manager
' con A s t cas P66 ject Engineer PFoject um I
6
l l
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units.1 & 2 Cor.sumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan December 5, 1983 Present For:
Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster G.
Murray J.
Fisher R.
Savo L.
Rouen J.
Gaydos J.
Springer E.
Cviki W.
Kilker Parsons None e
PURPOSE
- This meeting is held each day to discuss items regarding the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant Units 1 & 2.
DISCUSSION Status Items Item 64 FCR Interim Approval.
E.
Cviki reported that the procedural change on interim approval of FCRs is undergoing final sign-off. It was reported that the change will ultimately eliminate the interim approval phase of the FCR process after a few month transition phase. (WR. 51,pg. 2 Remains Open) (INFORMATION ITEM)
Item 64 NIR # 14.-
L.
Rouen reported the Assessment Team is satisfied with the MPQAD response requiring 100 percent receipt inspection. Therefore, the Team will close NIR # 14. (INFORMATION ITEM)
Item 64 Reporting Alert Level Cracks.
R.
Sevo said the QAR on the procedural violation in reporting alert level cracks has been dispositoned.
W.
Kilker said the Assessment Team will review the QAR prioi to closing Item 59-5. (Item 59-5 hemains open)
(INFORMATION ITEM) a New Item Item 64 US Testing. Corrective Action Status.
W.
Kilker requested an update on US Testing's corrective actions resulting from the MPQAD audit. and the Subcontracts G roup observations.
J.
Fisher said FSO will respond on 12/7/83. (OPEN ITEM)
Response Item There were no new response items discussed.
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan December 6, 1983 Present For:
Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster R.
Wieland J.
Fisher W.
Lytle J.
Springer R.
Wheeler J.
Gaydos R.
011ver' W.
Kilker J.
Schaub E.
Cviki S.
Lucks D.
Lavelle' W.
Craig M.
Blendy
- J.
Simpson' Parsons None
- Part time PURPOSE This meeting is held each day to discuss items regarding the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant Units 1 & 2.
DISCUSSION Status Items No new status items were discussed.
New Items Item 64 Coordination of Specification and Procedure. Changes.
R. Wheeler asked E.
Cviki what has been done to insure that change requirements in the spe'eification describing WJE activities ~will be reflected in the procedures.
Cviki st,a_ted if a procedural change is proposed, Engineering will withhold E.sign-off until an evaluation of any potential effects on the specification are,
Conversely, WJE has assigned a Lead Engineer to be responsible for incorp-made.
orating specification changes into the procedures, as required.(CLOSED ITEM)
Response Item Item 64 SWPS Crack Reporting.
. J.
Springer reported that FSO supplied a copy of the signed-off QAR addressing The Assessment the procedural violation on reporting of alert level cracks.
Team reviewed the QAR disposition and believes the, action being implemented is appropriate. ( CLOSES ITEM 59-5 )
The followins five items'are the Bechtel resconses to the five recommendations made in the Assessment Team Report entitled " Evaluation of Change and Nonconformance These responses refect the Status as of early December 1983 Documents."
Item 64 QAP Review Program.
The Bechtel Field Soil Organization (FSO), presented a proposal for the QAP review Subsequently, the generic concept of the QAP
-program to Consumers management.
review was accepted by Consumers management, who assigned the lead responsibility e
4
______1_. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _
~
L-Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of "nderpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan December 6,1983 of this activity to MPQAD and established a Task Force approach involving a full committee and subcommittee.
The Task Force committee established guidelines as follows:
a.
Select a pilot review program.
.b.
Develop guidelines for the subcommittee c.
Identify subcommittee representatives d.
Schedule activities e.
Review subcommittee recommendations f.
Make recommendations to management The subcommittee reviewed " Installation of Hilti Bolts" and covered the PQCI, construction procedare, and the specification and made recommendations to the Task Force committee regarding proposed revisions to these documents. It was decided that a review of a second procedure would be necessary. After the review of the second procedure is completed, the Task Force committee will make further recommendations about the continuation of this effort and ongoing QAP reviews.
The final extent of this effort and the decision to review other documents is contingent upon the recommendations that will be made to Consumers management by the Task Force committee after the completion of the review of the second procedure. (OPEN ITEM)
Item 64 Engineering Support At Jobsite.
The design calculations for the Borated Water Storage Tanks were delivered to the site as of November 2, 1983 The design calculations for the Service Water Pump, Structure will be delivered to the site in two phases.
The proposed delivery, dates coincide appropriately with the, construction activities.
The design calculations for the auxiliary building, with the exception of computer calculations or extremely complex calculations, will be delivered to the site in three phases. An initial review of the delivery schedules indicates that they, coincide appropriately with the construction activities. These calculations will also be supported with additional design people assigned to the jobsite.
The resident engineering staff has been reorganized and an additional group lead, dedicated to the handling of FCR, FCN and design-related NCR's and vendor drawings, has been assigned. Seven additional design engineers have been assigned to this group.
Bechtel Power Corporation has issued a memorandum covering the reorganization of the resident structural engineering soils group, assignments of increased respensiblity at the jopsite, and defines the goal of having the capability to process to final approval, 80 percent of the change documents at the jobsite.
Technical support is currently onsite for the engineering-consultants of Hanscr.
Engineering Inc. and Mueser, Rutledge, Johnston and DeSimone. (The Assessment Team will continue to review the staffing levels at the jobsite as part of its
\\
8 e
Notes of Daily Mesting
'Independcnt Anssssmant of Undsrpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan December 6,1983 -
(CLOSED ITEM) ongoing assessment, therer' ore this item is considered closed.)
Item 64-9_-
FCR/FCN Processing.
Field Change Request / Field Change Notices, PEP No.
'Bechtel procedure entitled 4.62.1, Rev. 1 dated December 2, 1983 has established time 1,ntervals from An expected approval time interim to. final approval of FCR and FCN's.
l has been stipulated, and an overall approval time from initiation to fina approval has been stipulated.
This procedure also established guidelines for the updating o d a maximum time after
. drawings from the issuance of the first documents an the issuance of a fifth document.
The response time will be improved with the delivery of the calculations on l engineering
. the jobsite, increase in the staff of the resident structura group and its reorganization, B_echtel has also instituted a review for drafting completeness on the change documents in order to expedite the turnaround time on drawing update.
proposes to also phase out the use of interim approval on the FCR's and FCN's and expects to implement this in the first, quarter of Conrumers Power Company 19.84..
(OPEN ITEM)
Trend Analysis.
Item 64-10_ -
Bechtel performed a one-time study of NCR's that related t the number of NCR's to This study indicated a direct the construction effort in terms of man-hours.ber of NCR's issued and the level o correlation between t e num However, no trending of quality can be h
of man-hours that was being expended.
made from this study.
Bechtel has entered all of the NCR's in a computerized logging system that permits ibutes.
the NCR's to be sorted by date, subject matter, response time, and other attr The FSO has developed and is using an NCR evaluation form which will review ea NCR issued and determine if there is a need to take corrective action methods used to accomplish the work.
The FSO is also performing a detailed evaluation of all NCR's related to welding.
Consumers MPQAD group is developing a trend analysis system which will be f
plantwida which will evaluate a total number of attributes against a number o It is expected unsatisfactory attributes vs time for each activity and attribute.th
~
84.
(OPEN ITEM)
O
__________.___m___
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan December 6, 1983 Item 64 Critical NCR's.
The FSO will continue to identify and status critical NCR's at the weekly engineering / construction meeting which are attended by AAPD project engineering, resident engineering, field engineering, MPQAD, and SMO.
with additional The resident structural engineering group has been expanded personnel onsite who have specific responsibility and authority to disposition design-related NCR's.
This should reduce the current response time and minimize the response time on priority NCR's which would impact the progress of the work.
Bechtel will continue to prioritize the NCR's being reviewed by MPQAD. (Assessment of the timely dispostion of critical NCR's is considered part of the normal activities of the Assessment Team therefore this item is closed.)(CLOSED ITEM)
G
~
e
_ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _
a Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan December 7. 1983
~
Present For:
Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster G.
Murray J.
Fisher R.
Sevo W.
Kilker R.
Wieland J.
Gaydos P.
Majeski E.
Cviki W.
Craig R.
Cleary J.
Werner Parsons None PURPOSE nis meeting is held each day to discuss items regarding the Inde;:endent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.
DISCUSSION Status Items
'Ihere were no significant status items discussed.
New Items Item 64 Drift Support Steel.
Majeski asked why some of the drift support steel in the drift to E5 was P.
marked "non-Q".
J.
Fisher responded that the material was purchased non-Q but the installation is Q.
Project procedures do not require that steel for temporary underpinning be purchased to Q requirements, although it must be installed under Q requirements. As a result of a recent procedural change, such non-Q material will be painted with a white stripe to prevent its possible use as Q material, after it has been removed from its present application.
The "non-Q" markings have been placed to Jdentify the steel in preparation to painting the white stripe.
(CLOSED ITEM)
Response Items Item 64 FCR Final Approval.
Cviki supplied a copy of the revised Engineering Procedure that changed the E.
final approval process.
Final approval of FCRs must now be completed within 20 days of the interim approval disposition. The previous procedure issue imposed no time restriction on the final approval sign-off. Bis response adequately addresses the concerns raised in Weekly Report 51. (CLOSES ITEM WR 51, pg. 2) 1
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consu'mers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan December 7, i983 Item 64 US Testing Corrective Action Status.
In response to an earlier Assessment Team request, R.
Cleary, and J.
- serner, of the Subcontracts Group provided an update on the response of US Testing to audit findings and a field engineering evaluation of their organization All of the original Consumer Power audit findings, dealing and performance.
Efforts are underway directly with US Testing have been closed, except one.
to resolve the remaining open finding that concerns Field Docuement Control.
Numerous changes have been made organizationally and procedurally at US Testing including assigning a new site manager, cross-training of personnel, increasing certification levels of lab chiefs, upgrading test forms and the filing system,,
formulating checklists and work instructions, and developing a QA overview group In addition, new equipment has been installed to provide within US Testing.
The number of NCRs have better control conditions for concrete cylinder curing.
The Subcontracts Group believes that US Testing been substantially reduced.
is making the adjustments & changes required to adequately respond to their observations.
This response adequately addressed the request for an update of the US Testing
~
corrective action status. (CLOSES ITEM 64-4) e
"'-~------------_-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Notes of-Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan December 8, 1983 No meeting was held on this date.
s e
1 e
'l e
O I
9
~
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan December 9, 1983 Present For:
Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster G.
Murray J.
Fisher R.
Sevo P.
Majeski J.
Gaydos B.
Holsinger E.
Cviki Parsons None PURPOSE This meeting is held each day to discuss items regarding the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units t & 2.
DISCUSSION Status Item Item 64 Rajacking E8 Grillage.
J.
Fisher reported that the E8 Grillage required rejacking because structural settlement exceeded the 10 mil alert level. The lift off loads were approximately 160 and 150 percent of design load for the Y and Z jacks respectively. These loads are currently being held. (INFORMATION ITEM)
New Item There were no new items discussed.
Response Item There were no response items discussed.
Notes of MPQAD Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan December 6,1983 Present For:
Stone & Webster MPQAD A.
Lucks (part-time)
J.
Meisenheimer J.
Springer R.
Oliver W.
Kilker M.
DeWitt G.
Johnson PURPOSE This meeting is held to obtain and discuss information relative to Q.A.
activities for scils underpinning work at the Midland Units 1 & 2.
DISCUSSION Status Items Item 64-1Q - Stop Work Order.
The J.
Meisenheimer provided an update on the status of Stop Work Order.
Phase I effort is complete and Phase II is nearing completion.
The Phase III document " clean-up" activitiy will be done by packager. (i.e., Civil Electrical, etc.) After this work is complete, the Soils work will be resumed under the Work Permit system. (INFORMATION ITEM)
New Itejn Item 64-2Q - MPQAD Review and Verification of Soils.
Meisenheimer reported the MPQAD Soils group has begun to review the irs J.
prepared at the site prior to September 1982.
This review is in conjunction with CCP cosmittment to the NRC to review old irs.
Any violation or deficiencies uncovered are being logged as NCR's.
(INFORMATION ITEM)
Response Items Item 64 Use of Supervisory Personnel.
J.
Meisenheimer described a draft to Item 57-60. The Assessment Team will review and comment on the response when it is issued.
(ITEM 57-60 remains open) (INFORMATION ITEM)
Item 64 40 - MPQAD Review of Crack Mapping.
Meisenheimer responded to an earlier Assessment Team request to sammarize the J.
The revised recent MPQAD corrective action with regard to crack monitoring.
PQCI will impose time limitations on completing the crack monitoring verification and MPQAD will receive a copy of the WJE data concurrent with submittal to the The PIPR update will require an audit of the WJE logs and verification of RSE.
timeliness of the QC activity. Specification changes have established a 30 mil crsck as the alert level and the written notification time has been set at 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
The Assessment Team believes this description of MPQAD corrective action adequately addresses the request raised in Item 62-4Q.
Onee work resumes.further a
g o'
Notes of MPQAD Me0 ting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Held at Midland Sit's Midland, Michigan December 6, 1983 part of the evaluation of crack monitoring by the Assessment Team will be this discussion item.
(The NIR's on-going evaluation and not reference end other open items will remain open until corrective action is completed.)
(CLOSES ITEM 62-40) e e
0 e
S s
g
- - - - - - - _ _. _ _.. _.