ML20080B442
| ML20080B442 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 12/08/1983 |
| From: | Lucks A STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| To: | Cook R NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20080B405 | List: |
| References | |
| 14358, NUDOCS 8402070140 | |
| Download: ML20080B442 (13) | |
Text
--____ _ ________ _ -_____
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
P.O. Box 2325 BOSTON, M AssAcHusETTs 02107 I
December 8, 1983 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Midland Site Resident Office J. O. No.14358 I
Route 7, Ref. MPF 63 Midland, MI. 48640 Attention :
Mr.
R.
Cook DOCKET NO.
50-339/330 MIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF UNDERPINNING REPORT NO. 63 A copy of the Independent Assessment of Underpinning Weekly Report No. 63 27, 1983 through December 3,1983 is enclosed for the period of NovemberIncluded as attachments are the minutes of the daily meetings held during the week between members of the Assessment Team with this letter.
and Site Engineering, Construction, and Quality Assurance personnel.
If you have any questions with respect to this report please contact me at (617) 589-2067 A.
Stanley Lucks Project Manager Enclosures ASL/pd 8402070140 840203 gDRADOCK 05000329 PDR
J.-0. No. 14358 Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Independent Assessment of Underpinning Weekly Report No. 63 November 26, 1983 through December 3 1983 l
Personnel on Site Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.
W.
Kilker 11/30 - 12/3 J.
Springer 11/30 - 12/3 L.
Rouen 11/29 - 12/3 P.
Majeski 11/27 - 11/29 B.
Holsinger 11/27 - 11/29 Meetings Attended Date Represented Purpose 11/26 - 12/2 Stone & Webster Daily Assessment Bechtel Team Meeting Consumers Power Underpinning and Remedial Soils Activities - Construction The Stop Work Order issued October 21, 1983, continued in effect throughout the week.
Assessment Team - Observations With the Stop Work Order still in effect and since MPQAD has not completed the Phase I review and release of the FCR/FCN issue resolution, the Assessment Team has no observations on the site activities for this time period.
The Team members continued to review Work Activity Packages and deal with the issuing and resolution of various NIRs.
Work Activity Packages Work Activity Package 59 comments have been satisfactorily resolved with WAP 71 remains open, awaiting _re_sponse the final approval of the FCR.
WAP 69 was reviewed and comments were submitted to to one action item.
FSO for reselution.
Nonconformance Identification Reports Date
'NIR No.
Description (Opened) (Closed) 14 Nut Procurement 8/11/83 12/3/83 O
~
I
'J'. O. NN. 14358
-Midland Plant' Units 1 & 2 Independent Assessment of Underpinning NIR Wo.
Description Date (Opened)(Closed) 16 Crack Monitoring 11/4/83 Procedure 17 FCR/FCN Review 11/15/83 Program 18 Crack Monitoring 11/17/83 Program QA/QC Review of 11/22/83 19 Crack Mapping Data 20' Concrete Admixture Dispenser Calibration 12/1/83 1 Open Items Items discussed during coetings are categorized as follows:
An itsm'for which an action is required. The. item will
.0 PEN ITEM -
remain open until the required action has been taken. Tracking is required.
CLOSED ITEM - An ' item, usually brought forward by the Assessment Team, that is discussed and adequately responded to. No tracking is required.
An item, brought forward to provide general background INFORMATION ITEM -
information regarding work, such as work status or an upcoming design change. No tracking is required.
An opinion or suggestion, given by the Assessment Team, OPINION ITEM -
The expressing an alternate construction or quality assurance technique.
opinion'or suggestion is given as a possible alternate that may facilitate No response or implementation is required as a result of an an operation.
Opinion Item.
CLOSES ITEM -XX-XX - This notation identifies an action that closes a previously identified open item. Tracking of the open item stops.
The following is a listing of all Open items from the Daily Meeting Notes with Bechtel and the Weekly Meeting with MPCAD.
Carry-over items from past weeks which have been Closed this week, are also listed.
~
f O
J. O. N3. 14358 Midltnd Pltnt Unita 1 & 2 Independent AI:s sm:nt of Und rpinning Closure Description _
Item No...
I' 63-16 Procedural or WR 9, Daily Meeting Notes, 11/15/82, No.8 Specification Change Verification WR 30, pg. 3 Project Engineering 63-17 Evaluation of Welding FCR Final Approval Open WR 51, pg. 2 Process Weld Tech Sheets Open WR 54, pg. 3 Wall Ties open 57-17 MPQAD Supervisory Open 57-6Q Personnel Lack of Drawing open WR 56, pg. 2 Reference Tubular Steel open 58-3 Lagging Slurry for Removal 63-3 58-13 of 36 In. Dia Casing Additional SWPS Cracks Open 59-5 Inspection of Non-Structural - Open WR 60, pg. 2 Welds WJE Procedure Open 60-4 Crack Mapping 63-15 62-2 Procedures MPQAD Review of Crack Open 62-4Q Monitoring Change Document Evaluation Open 63-11 Report Meeting
~
b Project Manager Project Engineer I
e
~
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan 1
November 28, 1983 Present For:
Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster G.
Murray J.
Fisher R.
Sevo B.
Holsinger J.
Gaydos P.
Majeski T.
Dabrowiak Parsons None FURPOSE
_. This meeting is hsid each day to discuss the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.
DISCUSSION Status Item Item 63 Rejacking at E8 Grillaga.
J.
Fisher reported that the E8 Grillage required rejacking on 11/23
-and again on 11/27 because movement reached a,lert levels.
Currently, the jacks on the grillage are being held at a load approximately 15 %
higher than the previous lock offload _.in order. to limit future movement.
( INFORMATION ITEM )
- New Item Item 63 Non-Structural Weld Inspection.
Majeski clarified the concern raised by the Assessment Team in Weekly P.
Report 60, pg. 2.
He indicated that the Assessment Team believes that the base metal for non-stru'etural welds on permanent steel should be inspected by MPQAD. Steps should be taken to assure that this will occur. (INFORMATION ITEM, Item WR 60, pg. 2 Remains Open )
Response Item Item 63 Slurry for Removal of 36 In.
Dia. Casing.
J.
Fisher acknowledged the Team's concerns regarding the mixing and consistency of the bentonite slurry.
He indicated that if similiar work was performed in the future, these concerns would be considered during preparation of the procedure.
P.
Majeski said that he had reviewed the drilling procesure Torinstallation.of the soldier piles and concurred Since there with FSO's previous conclusion that a change is not required.
are no plans to drill additonal slurry supported holes, other than those covered under the soldier pile installation procedure, the Assessment Team considers the discussion of the item closed.
(CLOSES ITEM 58-13)
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan November 29, 1983 Present For:
Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster J.
Fisher R.
Sevo P.
Majeski G.,.,Murray J.
Gaydos B.
Holsinger T.
Dabrowiak Parsons None PURPOSE This-meeting is held each day to discuss the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.
DISCUSSION
' Status Item c
Item 63 15 - Rejacking at E8 Grillage.
J.
Fisher reported that the load on the grillage has been maintained _at.
about 15% above the previous lock off lord. It is expected that the settlement -
rate criteria will be met by tomorrow at which time the load will be' reduced to 135% of design loac (previous lock off load was 125% ).
( INFORMATION ITEM )
New Items _
Item 63 Review of Weekly Report 61 For Open Items.
Week)y P. port 61 was reviewed for open items. No additional open items'were noted. (CLOSED ITEM )
Item 63-6 Evaluacion o7 tidnge and Nonconformance Documents Update Meeting.
Majeski indicated that W. Craig will be on site next week. He requested P.that FSO provide an update of the ongoing review of Quality Action Points, the status of providing additi.onal engineering personnel to the site for processing NCR's and FCR's; and a discussion of FSO scheduling practice.
This meeting is scheduled for December 6.
( OPEN ITEM )
Response Items There were no response items discussed.
e
Notes of Daily Meeting Indeper. dent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan November 30, 198)
Present For:
Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone-& Webs'er -
t G. 'Murray J.
Fisher R.
Sevo L. - Rouen J.
Gaydos J.
Springer" E.
Cviki Parsons None PURPOSE This-meeting le held each day to discuss the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.
DISCUSSION Statur Items
~
Item 63 Crack Monitoring.
E.
Cviki stated that. resolution of crack monitoring problems may become a critical path item ina lifting tihe Soils Stop Work Order. (INFORMATION ITEM)
Item 63 Rejacking of E8 Grillage.
On 11/29 the load on E8 Grillage was reduced tol 135% and locked off after the settlement criteria was met. (INFORMATION ITEM)
New Item Item 63 Admixture Calibration Data.
L.
Rouen requested more information concerning calibration data for dispensers of superplasticizer. ( OPEN ITEM )
Response Items There were no response items discussed.
I S
I-e' Notes of' Daily Meeting
. Independent Assessment of Underpinning.
Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Cosoani Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan December 1, 1983 Prosent For:
Consumers Power Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster G.
Murray J.
Fisher R.
Savo L.
Rouen J.
Springer J.
Gaydos E.
Cviki W.
Kilker Parsons None
- PURPOSE, This meeting is held each day to discuss the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant, Units 1 & 2.
. DISCUSSION c.
Status Items There were no new status items discussed.
New Items Item 63 WIR f 20.
Rouen informed the group that NIR, '20 was issued concerning the calibration L.
of concrete admixture equipment. (INFORMATION ITEM)
Response Items Item 63 Meeting on the Change Evaluation Report.
Fisher stated that FSO has reviewed the report and is addressing the J.recommendations contained in the report. A meeting will be held with the The discussion Assessment Team on 12-6-83 to present and discuss the responses.
will include the 3 topics requested by the Assessmerit Team in Item 63-6.
(CLOSES ITEM 63-6) (OPEN ITEM)
Item 63 Admixture Calibration Data.
Larry Rouen reported that the requested information was' supplied by J. Gaydos.
(CLOSES ITEM 63-9) e
k.
Notes of Daily Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning
. Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan December 2, 1983 Present For:
Consumers Powe'r' Bechtel MPQAD Stone & Webster G.
Murray J.
Fisher R.
Savo L.
Rouen J.
Springer J.
Gaydos E.
Cviki W.
Kilker Parsons None PURPOSE This meeting is held each day to discuss items regarding the Independent Soils Assessment at the Midland Plant Units 1 & 2.
DISCUSSION Status Item Item 63 Stop Work order and Crack Monitoring.
J.
Fisher reported that the target date for resolution of the Soils
'Stop Work order is December 12, in order to resume work on the Auxiliary The late date for resolution of items relating to the SWPS Building.
and direct hire work is December 25 E.
Cviki reported that resolution The of action items (NIRs, NCRs and QARs) is targeted for December 15 Stop Work Order will not be lifted until resolution of all crack monitoring.
(INFORMATION ITEM)
New Item Iten 63 Review of Weekly Report Number 62.
The Observations Weekly Report. # 62 was reviewed for potential open items.
section of the report contains several Team comments that evaluate the crack monitoring' activities. -In addition, the Management Review Team Trip Report contained an observation on work progress. Typically, these comments would result in action items to be responded to by one of the site organizations.
Kilker said, in this case, all of the comments are already However, W.
being addressed by either action items, open NIRs, or as part of the on-going general assessment of the work. Therefore, no new open items' will be listed.
(CLOSED ITEM)
Response Items Item 63 Engineering Review of Crack Monitoring Data.
Cviki submitted a copy of a memo issued to the Resident Engineering staff E.regarding the importance of timely reviews of WJE crack monitoring data J.
Springer replied that the memo adequately addresses submittals.
~
the Assessment Team concerns as stated in Item 62-2.. (C1,0SES ITEM 62-2)
I-Notes of Daily Meeting
~
Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumers Power Company Held at Midland Site
~
Midland, Michigan December 2, 1983 Ites 63 Verification of Specification or Procedural Changes.
Kilker reported the Assessment Team has verified the actions taken.on W.specification or procedural changes committed to in the Daily Meeting Notes of November 15, 1982. In the Team's opinion all of the items have been adequately addressed either through incorporation of changes in specifications
/ procedures or by further explanation and clarification. ( CLOSES ITEM 8, DMN 11/15/82 )
Item 63 Project Engineering Evaluation of Welding.
Fisher supplied a copy of the report-the project welding engineer prepared J.
The report contains numerous observations on changes to earlier this year.-
drawings or procedurea. The Assessment Team will close its' action item based on the submittal of this report. Further evaluation of welding by the Assessment Team will be done periodically as part of the general on-going assessment. ( CLOSES ITEM WR 30, pg. 3 )
1
Notes of MPQAD Meeting Independent Assessment of Underpinning Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Held at Midland Site Midland, Michigan December 2, 1983
-;No meeting was held this. week.
D 6
e I
e
I l.
.. o-
$ ;NE AND WEBSlER ENGINEERING'COR..kATIOM MIDLAND NONCONf0RMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT Fage 1 of 2 11-H-83 17 DATE OF NONCONFORMANCE:
-N!R Number FID - 2.400 FCR/FCN Review and Resolution.
IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS:
Prorram. Phase I.
r 1
FCR's from a samole of ninety-three do Thirty DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE:
not comolv to section 5.1.2.1 of crocedure FID - 2.400.
lot size of C64 which were classified Thi n mm-nle was taken from a nu not vanni ri ng re nnluti en in sectinn 5.1.2.2.
Roe n tt.m ahad lint nr nreacted FC9's.
REMARKS:
i
~ -
PROJECT 9
DATE: ll'lS~8 3 MANAGER;Ch jh]u,CJ+ Aslveks INITIATOR:
27 y b
Jn{60
/
y MPOAD CORRECTIVE ACTION BY:
(IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION)
Beview of the revised FID 2.400 determined the changes to t' accropricte and acceptable.
Review of the status of the identified FCR's show correct identification, per revised procedure.
These items close NIR # 17.
/g[ [I DATE:
PROJECT MANAGER :
INITIATOR:
I J
f./* v r--
.___.___.___-.___1____2
f"
(
N I R # 17 Page 2 of 2 CIVIL FCR's c-2636 C-32 c-2795 c-66 c-2834 c-230 c-3061 c-351 c-3669 c-386 c-3773 c-816 C-4110 C-868 c-4534 c-994 c-4656 C-1251 c-4915 c-1350 c-5500 c-1419 c-5949 C-1644 c-6088 C-1776 c-6183 c-2068 c-6601 C-2130 i
_