ML20055E380
| ML20055E380 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre, Rancho Seco  |
| Issue date: | 12/14/1987 |
| From: | Lieberman J NRC OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT (OE) |
| To: | Chandler L, Martin J, Miraglia F NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055C206 | List:
|
| References | |
| EA-86-110, NUDOCS 9007110308 | |
| Download: ML20055E380 (23) | |
Text
. - - -
j,
- A
\\
RE EO I
umiso starts C
e NUCLEAR REGULATOMY COMMIS$10N RE 10N V
.k P2) DEC 21 A II: 10 -
nee a w
.n.
- ,n,
E MORANDUM FOR:
$bNh.O Jack B. Martin y
3 Regional Administrator
- /
- hyj, p W ; dg T 1,
Region Y J ', Ms n:We,t ad 1%
Frank Miraglia Associate Director Wag Njj
- M for. Reactor Projects
.a d
- av He<
o Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
^ kM,) %fy Larry Chandler, Assistant Gene T:
Af e %;ka.
for Enforcement gt4%, "$;;w)jfc fi h
Office of the General Counsel
- ~ g~=
- n
'NC
~"
FROM:-
James Lieberman, Director Office of Enforcement
$UBJECT:
RANCH 0 SECO (EA 86-110)
TheAssistantAttorneyhandlingthecasehasrequestedthattheNRCrefrathfrom u
. proposing.a civil penalty in this case pending their decision on prosecution.
y
'Therefore, in en effort to resolve the-intelrity issue, it is proposed that the enclosed request for information under 10 C4 50.54(f) be made.
I committed
{
lJ to discussing our final approach with D0J before issuance.
D Unless a request under 10 CFR 50.54(f) is sought to verify the licensee's b
cogliance with the current licensing basis of. the facility, the NRC staff v
must prepare,the repons for each.information request made under 50.54(f)
! l I
to ensure the burden on the respondent is-justified in view of the potential safety significance of the issue.
i In this case it appears clear'that the NRC V
staff is seeking information to both verify the extent of the licensee's already
- i established noncompliance with the plant. licensing basis as well as information' to verify the. licensee's cogliance with the curre 1
~1n-sy view, an analysis does not appear necessary.nt licensing. basis.. Therefore. ':
In an effort to meet the previously agreed timetable for resolving restart l-o enforcement concerns-at Rancho Seco, please call Jim Luehmen with your comments a
after you have reviewed the enclosure.
[(
l:
James Lieberman, Director Office of Enforcement
Enclosure:
As Stated
-cc:
J.. Taylor DED0 I ~!
I hh z
i 4
900712C308 90062
? ?- 63 FDR ADOCK 03000 h
P P
p
,w w -
p h
h l'y e
I Docket No. 50-312 EA 86-110 Sacramento Municipal Utility District Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station ATTN:
G. Carl Andognini Chief Executive officer Nuclear 14440 Twin Cities Road Herald, California 95638-9799 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION This refers to a special NRC inspection conducted at Rancho Seco by members of the NRC staff during the wriod of April 1, 1986 through May 15, 1986, of activities authorized by (RC License No. DPR-54. The subject inspection report was transmitted to you by separate correspondence dated June 6, 1986. An enforcement conference related to the inspection findings was held at the Region V office on June 20, 1986, with members of the District staff. Based on the results of this inspection and discussions during the enforcement conference, it appears that certain of your licensed sctivities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements.
The findings set forth in the inspection report demonstrate a failure of the District to implement its technical specification requirements to preclude release of liquid effluents containing radioactivity in amounts exceeding the dose criteria set forth in 10 CFR 50, Appendix 1 evaluate changes to the facility as required by 10 CFR 50.59: maintain and implement procedures and report the release of radioactive material in effluents as prescribed in the facility Technical Specifications. The inspection findings present a picture.
. of. how the District during 1985, in spite of commitments made in the letter dated September 24, 1984, permitted piping to connect the primary and secondary water storage systems allowing a pathway for discharge of radioactivity to the environment and decreased counting times for effluents with the apparent purpose of lowering the detection capability for radioactive releases which resulted in improper discharges.
We have received and reviewed your July 3, 1986 and October 8, 1987 letters l
describing your corrective actions in response to the inspection findings. We also acknowledge your continuing efforts to improve your performance in the area'of radioactive affluents as well as many other areas since the plant was shut down two years ago. The two letters referenced however, limit themselves largely to corrective actions of a technical and programmatic nature.
In order to enable the NRC to determine the extent of the enforcement action to be taken including what action, if any, should be taken with respect to your i
license, you are to submit within 30 days, under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(f),
your assessment of the management and wrsonnel considerations surrounding the inspection findings.
Your submittel siould include any reports of invest <gation you might have in this matter, en identification of the involved managers and
f 0
,0 Secremento Municipal Utility District supervisors, a review of the decisions they made relative to the control of the sip ng modifications and radiological effluents paying particular attention-to t w asis and motivations for the decisions. Decisions made,by any esp oyees who still work in your organization should be closely examined and your be is for having confidence they can properly discharge activities under the facility license should be discussed.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.7H of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2 Title
- 10. Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
The responses directed by this letter and the enclosed Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of.1980, PL 96-511.
Sincerely, s
John B. Martin Regional Administrator cc:
J. Vinquist, SMUD G. A. Coward, SMUD l
K. A. Meyer, SMUD State of California 1
l
. A
.1.
0 k:)
,.N v ;., o...!
.. i,.
j 1
Secremento Municipal Utility District 3
i 01stribution:
i
.PDR
.LPDR ACR$
i
.CA-l SECY-JTaylor,'DEDR0
'JMartin,'RV
., l '
JLieberman,-DE
[
a
- Avehmen, OE j
E
. LChandler, OGC F!ngram PA Enforcement Specialist
. RI, RI! RIII, RIV. RV i
Uo.
BHayes.0I SConnelly, O!A l
EJorden, AE00 o
TMurley,'NRR
'FMiraglia, NRR
{
OE File.
DC$
.0
.l'
.i u
.p I
+
s.['
t l
i e
b l','
OE-OGC RV OE:D DEDRO JLuehmen LChandler JMartin JLiebernen JTaylor 12/. /87
.12/ /87 12/ /87 12/ /87 12/ /87 l l' l:-
h
.J
=
m.
4 K-y 9
1 b
1 i
.p,, -
76 1
SMUD/NRC M EETIN G y
m m,.
, ep, J'
j l
5-.
=
1 did h@4:
M AN AGEMENT OF j
I 0
i.. e
~'1 c#r-M.h R ADIOLOGICAL i
_ %Ig.
f"x ": !
EFFLUENTS
$73E B.
3 7 a 2 1H.'1. ~ M :4
. =. =..
- 13ir, Me m
_-,ynF $
l
?,g JF T rr
~.r;, N=-= g m i
__- wr 3
Y=>
l r
5 NOVEMBER 13, 1987 l
-n
)
'l
.i I
l l
- - " ~ "
- awe,
-<y-m
.s..,____--
_._,__.,m-u. _ _ _ _ _ _
_u.,_.__m_ _ __u__.-ee
=
AGENDA o
INTRODUCTION
( DON MARTIN )-
CURRENT STATUS ( HARVEY STORY- )
o WORKING SESSION - '( ALL- ) '
o
SUMMARY
(
DON MARTl_N )
o l
1 1
. ~ -... _.
~-
1 _
- J.
met-IING PURPOSE 4
AN INFORMATION AND. WORKING SESSION TO:
o ENSURE AGREEMENT ON AND AN UNDERSTANDING OF THOSE SPECIFIC ACTIONS NECESSARY TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO AND AFTER RESTART o
PROVIDE A FORUM FOR A TECHNICAL EXCHANGE (WORKING SESSION) TO PERMIT TIMELY CLOSURE OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES 1
G y
-~w y=
m p
- g*,
u m
._,.____.m.m_.
mm.
.~
s.---a
-4.-
4.
- .7 4
SUBMII I AL/ REVIEW CONCERNS o
OCTOBER 26, 1987-NRC ' ETTER ODCM/REMP/ SYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS SUBMISSIONS RETS REVISIONS : SUBMISSIONS EFFLUENT CONTROL PROGRAM IMPLEM ENTATION DESIGN BASIS o
DELAYS DUE? TO INTERNAL V&Vs RESULTING -lN IMPROVED QUALITY.
o DISTRICT STANDS READY-TO ASSIST IN EVERY WAY POSSIBLE.TO SUPPORT A-TIMELY-REVIEW BY -THE NRC S
=
. a v.
c
~
~
g m...
~ _.
4 EFFLUENT ACCOUNTABILITIES AT RESTART F CEO
- NUCLEAR s
' I a AccouNrAmt.mES TRANSPERRED TO
- g..
cNamsrwr otrr. Arret REzrmr I
DIRECTOR l
- QUALITY
- - To cEn
' I
- Auorr AND sumeu#ecE g
or RApiot.concAL enusENTS P"="~
I l
ACM.
I TECHNICAL AND I
- Agy ADMINISTRATIVE I
NUCLEAR.
SERVICES I
POWER I
I I
.. 3 I
g
. DIRECTOR I
D! RECTOR otRecton TECHNICAL I
NUC. OPERAn0NS PLANT '
^
I AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES -
SUPPORT I
i I
I
. l l
1 I
MANAGER-u-
MANAGER MANAGER
- I
- RADIATION MANAGER LICENSING PROTECTION I
E
~ ~~~-
e PRE-REEASE EVAU5 a oA3EDUS Em.UENT~
+ NRc NmerAcE
. Em.utNr PRooRm a APPRoVAUB SAMPuNo ovERSnz a coNmot
- APPROVE MONITOR a PRE-RELEASE DOSE
. Emutwr oosE SEr PoeNr CHANCES cat. cut.ADoNS PRoJEenoNS
- #ETIAMoN a MtMMADON a REM ASE PEMur 1
- ENVRoNMENTAL DOSE
. or RELEASES ogNepAnon
~
ASsEssuens
- RADIAMoM McNm.RMo MANAGER
. - PRooRAM SYSTEM -
ENGINEERING AND DATA ANALYSES
. Em.utwr TEcN SPEC MANAGER MANAGER
. &TE MA!NTENANCE CHEMISTRY
. oES,oM cNmoES To RADlot.DCICAL ENV.SAMPuMo PRooRAM DEPARTMENT Em.uENT SYWTEM o LDNo TERM -
- MerTENANCE AND '
.PAooRm uAnc cauenAnoN or
= uove EFPWENT i
iMPMovEMENTs Em.uENr MoNfToRtNo SAMPUNo seSmuMEwrAnoN
. uoue a oAsEous e ADJUST NSmUMENr SWPtX ANAC.YSIS
"*""3
~
l oM.4 11/ie/e7 -
-PP++.
e.m
--e.'
.,e-e1
" ' * ' -p p.
- ,e-g
-*ey,..g-pmere++i 3
ra
- T'dgw
%a==*a
.a-'
-eu?'w g
-v.m'.-ee.-*
-g
,e'<wy au-r='"'fwa1 r>
c-
'rJ.-('
y
,+=W"*M M-3sy-9 h.--e F~'q1"WT g
Mgwe " hmq"
74E.
"W-j
IHealth Physics / Chemistry Services ^j l Radiological Effluent Support j
supervisor.
E,,_.
g I
__________.___j HP/ Chemistry Services
- 7 g,g liarvey Story Y
1, toy
~
l:
m Technical [ssistantl:: C E.
Vic.*.nderson b% #NN '
_' t, -
-l 8
. _. L.._ -
i HP/ALARA Supervisor Environmental Programs Chemistry Support C
Supervisor C.yg., Supervisor I. V Bob Baron i
William Wadman 3., y e,,
i YCyp 3 A
- u. %g '
oh '
" D' " 4 8
Health Physicist Health Physicist 9%
._ Chemistry Support C
C Bob Hite Se Turf E-Tom Valley Peter Murphy YYI
[
Chemistry Support Health Physicist C
Engineering Tech-nician S
C Rod Christenot Jack Beentjes 93 %e Tom 3uess i
Health Physicist Health Physicist y%
Chemistry Support C
Bob Harrington Jennifer Cameron C
Health Physicist Health Physics 3
Chemistry Support C
y l
Robert Hudspeth Techn,cian i
l Al Bulf l
' Health Physicist C
Art Kamrowski
)
I Ss SMUD l
t C = Contractor-C f
Health Physicist Y"
- "I l
Ruby Lee a
r.
.c._-___
. -.. "i...
~
e_
~
^
=s
=
-f
.o,.
4 SMUDL APPENDIX i P'OSITION l
l DESIGN IS ADEQUATE'TO STAY WITHIN APPENDIX l-UNDER o
NORMAL CONDITIONS RANCHO SECO ' WAS NOT AND 15 NOT DESIGNED TO STAY WITHIN
]
o
. APPENDIX l FOR ALL POSSIBLE OPERATING EVENTS _
o MANAGEMENT'S OBJECTIVE 115 TO OPERATE THE PLANT WITHIN APPENDIX l ALARA GUIDELINES AND CONTINUE TO DEVELOP.
l A LARGER OPERATING ENVELOPE.
APPROPRIATE -CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WILL BE TAKEN AND THE NRC o
INFORMED ^ WHEN PROJECTIONS INDICATE APPENDIX l MAY BE EXCEEDED' APPROPRIATE ACTIONS MAY INCLUDE TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS, o
PERMANENT' MODIFICATIONS, AND/OR PLANT SHUTDOWN
~
").
a
,s_,
. _,, _..,, ~
.__._.____._.__.,m
.. a
=.
w ACTION ITEMS l (A PENDIX l
COM MITM ENTS)
RESULTING FROM:'
~
~
o INSPECTION R EPORT186 o FRANKLIN REPORT e
~
o NRC EVALUATION l
o QCl-12 PROCESS o NEC AUDIT l
l o
33 OF 63 ITEMS COMPLETE o
6 REMAINING ITEMS REQUINED PRIOR TO RESTART l
o 11 REMAINING ITEMS NOT REQUIRED PRIOR TO RESTART BUT WILL BE CLOSED PRIOR TO RESTART o
13 REMAINING ITEMS TO BE CLOSED AFTER -RESTART:
~
l 6
G s
qE
.~ ; %s
....f%.,-
a-.9 p.-,.7
=pg.
$wwy.
re
M'
"-eW v
--*N'--
PF<
" - -- w vv -
'-w"-*
p
"'W&
=
rh"'
a
.. 7
- t MAJOR SYSTEMS DESIGN / OPERATIONAL. CHANGES o
DISPOSABLE SECONDARY SIDE RESINS' o
RHUT "C" (NON-RADIOACTIVE -WASTE WATER) **M M o
DEMINERALIZATION AND STRAINER ' PROCESS lNG o
HARD PIPING TO SPENT REGENERANT TANKS o
RHUT "A" AND B" CANNOT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY 'OFFSITE o
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION UPDATED en g
e - wi
,,.,m-m.
gj.
.m-.!
---n
-w1 a.--
es.sshcs
- g
-pE<
p--A p,.c.a
. - = -
y
%=u,
-wmp
,, r9 p,m g
.y.c.i 4,-p.a-*g.a
"*4#
T M4i' w'WM%
f9'**-N'
1 - ll l
gmy ;;g97g;;
l
-:23 Q r.,.,_)[ [,[if, ' ;[9 M=
.. =
=
,g; n.
a.
m.,,
A.,,
1 HARDWARE EVALUATIONS:
o CALC ULATIONS o
INDEPENDENT -CALCULATION REVIEW o
GALE CODE PREDICTIONS W
~
-~
~~
&I I
' RANCHO SECO OPERATIONAL ENVELOPE.-- FRACTION OF
- APPENDIX I ALARA-GUIDANCE FOR GIVEN FUEL' DEFECT AND PRIMARY T0 SECONDARY LEAKAGE l
PRI-SEC LEAK: RATE (GPM)
FAILED FUEL (%;
0.01 0.02 0.03
'0.04-0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 do y
Y
.01
. 0.04 0.07 0.11
'O.15 0.18 0.22 0.26 0.29
'0.33-0.37 y
.02 0.07
'0.15 0.22 0.29 0.37 0.44 0.51 0.58 0.66 0.73 g
l
.03 0.11 0.22 0.33 0.44 0.55 0.66 0.77 0.88 0.99 1.10
,p l
.04 0.15 0.29~
0 0.58 0.73 0.88 1.02 1.17 1.31 1.46
[
.05 0.18 0
-0.73 0.91 1.10 1.28 1.46 1.64 1.83 I
.06 0.22 OW4 0.66 0.88 1.10 1.31 1.53 1.75 1.97 2.19 i
.07 0.26 0.51 0.77 1.02 1.28 1.53 1.79 2.05 2.30 2.M
.08 0.29 0.58 0.88 gl.17 1.46-l'75 2.05 2.34 2.63 2.92
.09 0.33 0.66 0.99 l'.31 1.64 1.97 2.30 2.63 2.96
.3.29
.10 0.37 0.73
-1.10 1.46 1.83 2.19 2.56 3.29 3.65
.11 0.40 0.80
- 1. 7.1 1.61 2.01 2.41 3.21 3.62 4.02
.12 0.44 0.88 1.31 1.75' 2.19
- 2. 63..
3.07 3.51 3.94 4.38
.13 0.47 0.95 1.42 1.90.
2.37 2.85 3.32 3.80 4.27 4.75
.14 0.51
-1.02 1.53 2.05 2.56 3.07 3.58 4.09 4.60 5.11
.15
- 0.55 1.10 1.64-2:19-2.74 3.29 3.83 4.38
~4.93~
5.48 l
i.-
. - ~ -
.m._. -.
.~:
- ~ _.. _, _ _ -
_ _. - - - ~
-m__.
~... -.
-. 7 7
7
-O FFSITE D OS E CALC U LATIO N. M AN UAL-
~
+
o REVISED AND INTERNALLY APPROVED 10/3b/87 o
SU BMITTED TO NRC 1O/30/87 o
VALIDATION / VERIFICATION SCHEDULED FOR CO M P LETIO N IN' EAR LY-- 'D EC EM B ER h
o INCORPORATE V&V COMMENTS PRIOR TO RESTART 1
==3,e:<a g
=
.eu,-
w.
f
.ps, w
4 J.
-.,,,w.
g.<
h p,.,..
e.a..
+ -. 7-,#N,.
,-g,+
~,,.
..g__,_
m.
~-:jf q: -
f =':
~
~
~
"D%
1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP); MANUAL i
i o
DEVELOPED AND INTERNALLY APPROVED 10/7/87 L
l o
SUBMITTED TO NRC 1O/20/87 f
o SUBMITTED UPDATE TO NRC 11/13/87 &g, o
VALIDATION / VERIFICATION. SCHEDULED-FOR COMPLETION IN EARLY DECEMBER INCORPORATE V&V COMMENTS PRIOR, TO.' RESTART o
O e
g
_i... ~.,,
_.,. r;
.,a
~.,,-.._.,,.;....
_A,
.: ~ ; -
1
,f f-L TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS -(PA 155) l o
SUBMll l ED TO NRC 6/30/87 o
REVISION 1
SUBMil.l ED TO NRC 10/3/87' o
REVISION 2 TO BE SUBMITTbD TO NRC IN MID-DECEMBER A
a p
x> -
v f
p.,. 4 l
-(//
09#
L e
e l.
l t.
-. = -
~
..:-..~..=
~
ac A
~
TRANSITION -PLAN-IMPLEMENTATION OF-REVISED MANAGEMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL LIQUID EFFLUENT PROGRAMS WILL BE IN THREE PHASES
^-
PHASE I (SHORT -TE.RM - RESTART)
- o o
PHASE 11 (NEAR TERM POST RESTART) o PHASE Ill (LONG TERM EVALUATIONS / MODIFICATIONS)..
9
=
0 Q-.m.=,
_m.-cma g-s-
.p-m.
.m-m=,.c
.s m,a%-.
w.,%ew w+
wam has:.wse m a ss -
mwin-a-EM _aw er, e-eww--
.g_,_ _.,,
w-i
~
~
~
..a
- 3 1
R:
~ '. k'.
~ -
w I.
TRANSITION PLAN i
PHASE I (SHORT TERM RESTART)
SYSTEM HARDWARE (LIQUID EFFLUENT SYSTEM) o TEST EQUIPMENT o
ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES EVALUATE INCREASING CHARGING /Lt_l DOWN' FLOW-o o
TRAIN PERSONNEL a
o IMPLEMENT' OPERATING. PROCEDURES W
2 e
.,2
,e-
---.h<%-,.
u..-
+., - ' - -
g,
.v ee n.
,%.y
'e's
'.w--e,.
-e
--+=Nmy.--
u.
+r
-q,W+-
~ e + n er-d'w--+
-~b-m
-**'s- -'- * "'-
'W- - - - - - - - --
2' - -
~
g c
TRANSITION -PLAN PHASEI (SHORT-TERM RESTART)-
PROGRAMMATIC /ANALYSISL SU PPORT.
EFFLUENT - CONTROL MANUAL- (POLICY DOCUMENT)?
o o
EFFLUENT CONTROL MANUAL lMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT ACTION PLAN k'Y o-o SECURE NEW DETECTO'R AND REVISE CHEMICAL PROCEDURES 0o 3
o PA 155,.REV. 2 AND 'IMPLEM E'NTATION PLAN SU8MITTAL o
NRC.; ACCEPTANCE OF ODCM o
APPROVAL. OF ODCM -lMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE o
IMPLEMENT REVISED S ODCM,- PROCEDURES, AND
" RESTART PORTIONS" OF -PA 155, s REV 2 i
..,_qe.....
me u-p r <
~
..g p u
- rg e-a
.,--.e._
g-'5aw, g.
.a.
w-e.s.m_
,,,-w.y..e:.
<w-p o,,,,-
. =..
y....,W
=
ggy
-~
3__+
~
~
r
~
TRANSITIO N PLAN.
PHASE 11- (NEAR. TERM
-POST RESTART)
~
o-CONSTRUCTION-OF TANK. FARM FIX.
M> N o
DEVELOP ON-LINE' EVALUATION / TRENDING PROGRAM o
TRANSFER RP ACCOUNTABILITIES TO CHEMISTRY
~
- REVISE EFFLUENT PROCEDURES f "d
- TRAIN-CHEMICAL TECHS
.gh' y
v DEBUG, TEST, AND V&V NUCL' EAR DATA' SOFTWARE (REIMS) o o
IMPLEMENT EFFLUENT PROGRAM WITH REIMS o
INSTALL ADDITIONAL FLOWRATE-MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION e
me.
m
- - -..mm:--
N.--.m--..__u=
.__a se#e_u.mm.e---
am..e h-
-v_..m..w-.--
_s#.
s-=%--
-m
r-
+
g~
-c-y
= - -
=
p
~ ~
-.f.
c.
v
-4 m.
-TRANSITIO N PLAN PHASE Ill (LONG TERM -EVALUATIONS / MOD 1FICATIONS)
~
COST-BENEFIT EVALUATIONS FOR FURTHER' HARDWARE /OPERAT.lONAL~
~ ~
ENHANCEMENTS-
~
o LLDs AT 10% EQUIVALENT APPENDIX lVALUES o
ADDITIONAL PROCESSING-EQUIPMENT
- ADDITIONAL DEMINERAOZERS
- ADDITIONAL RHUTs PRIMARY / SECONDARY--WATERf INVENTORY CONTROL PROGRAM o
o INCREASE Cs PRIMARY SIDE -FILTRATION CAPABILITY INSTALL ~ ADDITIONAL SAMPLIN'G POINT.(WELL) ON-SITE o
4 4
e
- a