Text

Annual Environ Operating Rept,Vol 2 - Radiological,1981
	ML20050B391
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	03/31/1982
From:	Baynard D; FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20050B372	List: ML20050B371; ML20050B379; ML20050B391;
References
	NUDOCS 8204050278
	Download: ML20050B391 (98)
	v • d • e

_

i d

4 O

i ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPE'lATING REPORT VOLUME 2 - RADICLOG CAL 1/1/81 - 12/31/81 i.

1 T

.I l

1 CRYSTAL RIVER - UNIT 3 j

FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION 7

FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-72 1

DOCKET NO. 50-302

. O March, 1982 l

l-i i

i I

i j

APPROVED BY: Manager Nuclear Support Services dTah.

L l

oATe: bl2 2 9 / 9/L

\\

LO i

8204050278 820331 PDR ADOCK 05000302 l

R PDR

O 148tE or courents PAGE q

Introduction 1

II Milk and Green Leafy Vegetables Census 4

III Media Other than External Radiation 5

IV External Radiation 88 i

O O

i

~~

O

'IST OP Tastes PAGE I-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 2

111-1 Air Inhalation Pathway - Gross Beta Analyses Sumary 7

III-2 Air Inhalation Pathway - I-131 Analyses Sumary 8

III-3 Air Inhalation Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 9

III-4 Air Inhalation Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 10

!!!-5 Air Inhalation Pathway - Sr-89 and 90 Analyses Sumary 11 III-6 Precipitation Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 13 III-7 Precipitation Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 14 III-8 Precipitation Pathway - Tritium Analyses Sumary 15 III-9 Sea Water Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 17 III-10 Sea Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 18 O

III-11 Sea Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Sumary 19 III-12 Sea Water Pathway - Sr-89 and 90 Analyses Sumary 20 III-13 River Water Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 22 III-14 River Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 23 III-15 River Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Sumary 24 III-16 Ground Water Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 26 III-17 Ground Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 27 III-18 Ground Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Sumary 28 III-19 Potable Water Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 30 111-20 Potable Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 31 III-21 Potable Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Sumary 32 OG 11

-~

LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

PAGE III-22 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 34 III-23 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 35 III-24 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway - Sr-90 Analyses Sumary 36 III-25 Sea Food Chain Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 38 III-26 Marine Plant Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 39 111-27 Marine Plant Pathway - Sr-89 and 90 Analyses Sumary 40 111-28 Ingestion Crab Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 42 111-29 Ingestion Crab Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 43 111-30 Ingestion Carnivorous Fish Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 45 III-31 Ingestion Carnivorous Fish Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 46 III-32 Ingestion Herbivorous Fish Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 48 111-33 Ingestion Herbivorous Fish Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 49 III-34 Ingestion Oysters Pathway - Gamma Analyses Sumary 51 III-35 Ingestion Oysters Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 52 III-36 Ingestion Shrimp Pathway - Gama Analyses Summary 54 III-37 Ingestion Shrimp Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 55 III-38 Ingestion Milk Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 57 111-39 Ingestion Milk Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 58 III-40 Ingestion Milk Pathway - Sr-89 and 90 Analyses Sumary 59 iii

J Q

LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

PAGE d

III-41 Ingestion Animals Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 61 111-42 Ingestion Animals Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 62 111-43 Food Chain (Grasses) Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 64 111-44 Food Chain (Grasses) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 65 III-45 Ingestion Food Crops (Citrus) Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 67 III-46 Ingestion Food Crops (Citrus) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation Analyses 68 111-47 Ingestion Food Crops (Watermelon) Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 70 111-48 Ingestion Food Crops (Watermelon) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation Analyses 71 Q

III-49 Food Chain (Soil) Pathway - Gama Analysis Sumary 73 III-50 Food Chain (Soil) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 74 III-51 Food Chain (Meat) Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 76 III-52 Food Chiin (Meat) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 77 111-53 Food Chain (Poultry) Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 79 111-54 Food Chein (Poultry) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of 80 Analyses III-55 Food Chain (Eggs) Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 82 III-56 Food Chain (Eggs) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 83 III-57 Food Chain (Green Leafy Vegetables) Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 85 O

iv

.=. -

=

t.

I I

I i

O

'ist or tastes (coat 4aueo) t i

PAGE j

III-58 Food Chain (Green Leafy Vegetables) Pathway - Statistical l

Evaluation of Analyses 86

.q III-59 Food Chain (Green Leafy Vegetables) Pathway - Sr-90 Analyses Sumary 87 IV-1 Air Submersion Pathway - TLD Analyses Sumary (University of Florida) 89 1

d IV-2 Air Submersion Pathway - TLD Analyses Sumary (State of Florida) 90 4

IV-3 Air Submersion Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 91 l

1 I

I i

!O Y

1 i

i 1

i i

1

,l O V

i'

O I.

R*ucTI

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program provides information which can be used to assist in assessing the type and quantity of radiation exposure in unrestricted areas resulting from plant operation. The Program is conducted via a contract with the University of Florida, Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Gainesville, Florida and a grant to the State of Florida, Department of Heal th and Rehabilitative Services, Orlando, Florida.

The parts of the Program for which each are responsible are listed in Table I-1.

In essence, the Program provides a continuation of the preoperation program so that any increases of radioactivity in the r

environment can be detected.

No pathway has shown any confirmed increases of radioactivity in the environment due to plant operation during this report period.

1 In the sumary analysis tables, two terms are used which neeo explanation.

The term "ND" means that the activity of the nuclide for the samples was non-detectable or less than half of the LLDs for those samples.

The term

"<LLD" means that the activity of the nuclide for the samples was less than the LLDs for those samples.

In this way, an apparent change in activit.y below the lower limits of detection can be trended without getting bogged down in " actual" activity values.

The statistical evaluations of operational analyses were performed using one-fourth the LLD value if the activity was non-detectable and using three-fourths the LLD value if the activity was less than the LLD value.

O when a noa-detectabie or iess thea LLD coaceatretica is used ia ea evaiua-tion, the results are prefaced with a "<" sign to show that the results do not indicate only detected activity.

Finally, the statistical evaluation of the operational concentrations where there are preoperational results includes the median values.

This is done solely for comparison to preoperational results.

l i

l O 1

l t

s O

Teaie 1-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RESPONSIBILITY PATHWAY SAMPLE STATIONS (1)

University Air Submersion C04, C14H*, C14M*, C14G*,

C40, C41, C43, C46 State Air Submersion C07, C09, C18, C26 University Air Inhalation C41*

State Air Inhalation C04, C07, C18, C26, C40, C46 State Precipitation C04, C26, C40 University Sea Water C01, C09, C13 C14H, C14M, C14G*

State River Water C15 State Ground Water C40 O

ua4 erster eatebie weter co7 cio ct8 University Shoreline External C01, C09, C14H*, C14M*,

Sediment C14G*

Universi ty Seafood Chain C29, C30 University Ingestion Crab C29*, C30 University Ingestion Fish C29*, C30 (Carnivorous)

Universi ty Ingestion Fish C29*, C30 (Herbivorous)

University Ingestion Oysters C29, C30 University Ingestion Shrimp C2/

University Ingestion Milk C47, C49*

University Ingestion Animals C45 University Food Chain (Grasses) COS, C40, C41 0

2

()

Table I-1 (Continued) i i

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 4

RESPONSIBILITY PATHWAY SAMPLE STATIONS (1)

State Ingestion Food C19 Crops (Citrus) 1 State Ingestion Food C04 Crops (Watermelon)

University Food Chain (Soil)

C04, C07, C18, C26, C40, C41, C46 State Meat C50 State Poultry C51 State Eggs C51 1'

Universi ty Food Chain C47, C48*

(Vegetables)

()

1 l

8

Critical Pathway Sample Stations (1) See ETS Table 3.2-4 and Figures 3.2-2 and 3.2-3 for the description and location of all Sample Stations.

j 3

i

1 l

11. MILK AND GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLE CENSUS O

Environiaental Technical Specification 3.2.1 requires a census of animals 4

producing milk for human consumption to be conducted semiannually.

If this i

census fails to locate any such animals, a census of gardens producing

]

fresh leafy vegetables for human consumption is required annually.

l The garden census, required as the result of a lack of findings on the milk animal census, was completed on June 9 and 10, 1981.

The critical garden (Sample Station C48) found to be in the east sector at 4.0 miles i

from the plant.

l A semiannual milk cow survey was completed on June 9 and 10,1981, again with no milk animals found.

The critical station for green leafy vege-tables was continued at the garden 4.0 miles from the plant in the east j

sector.

l A seminannual milk cow census was completed on December 14 and 21,1981.

j Ho milk animals were located within five miles of the plant site in this i

census.

j O

i

(

o l

i

'l 1

O l

4

Q III. MEDIA OTHER THAN EXTERNAL RADIATION AIR INHALATION PATHWAY The Air Inhalation Pathway is one of two pathways split between the Univer-sity and the State.

In addition to the assigned stations, the University operates a station at C47.

Weekly I-Gross Beta Analysis The summary for the gross beta analysis is in Table III-1.

Four weekly samples were not collected and analyzed:

C41 for the week of February 25, 1981 due to the sample being lost in mailing.

C04 for the week of June 15, 1981 due to equipment malfunction.

C47 for the week of October 9,1981 due to power interruption to sampling equipment.

C41 for the week of October 17, 1981 due to failure to collect the sample.

(Sample spanned a two week period.)

All other samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations for this type of analysis.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-4.

O The operational concentrations are similar to the preoperational concentra-tions and consistent with previous operational years' concentrations.

Weekly I-131 Analysis The summary for the iodine analysis is in Table III-2.

Three weekly samples were not collected and analyzed:

C41 for the week of April 10, 1981 due to an error which resulted in discarding the sample prior to analysis.

C47 for the week of October 9,1981 due to power interruption to sampling equipment.

- C41 for the week of October 17, 1981 due to failure to collect sample. Sample spanned a two week period.

All other samples were collected and analyzed.

Station C41 is the critical station for this type of analysis and no samples had activity greater than 10 times the control station's 95 percentile values. A statistical evalua-tion of the operational data is presented in Table III-4. There is no pre-operational data.

The statistical analysis of the critical and control stations for the period of this report is presented in Table III-4.

l l

5

Quarterly Gama Analysis _

The sumary for gama analysis of quarterly composites is in Table III-3.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations for this type of analysis.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-4.

The concentrations of nuclides by gama analysis during 1981 were generally less than the preoperational concentrations and consistent with all previous operational years' concentrations.

Quarterly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The sumary for the strontium analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-5.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A stati stical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table III-4.

There are no preoperational data and all operational concentrations are consistent.

O l

4

_m i

Table III-!

EllVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NONITORING PROGRAN

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL HIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/01 PATilWAY I

TYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR 4 * * * * *

u s e z * * *

a n u m * * * * * *

n n u s * * * * * *

a * -4 *

i e 4

u n a s *

u * * * * *

n s * * * * * * * * * *

a m * *

s 4 * * * * * * * *

a a i m *

a z e * * *

4

e l

AIR l t N IAl. AT I ON

k (PCI/H3) n GROSS D 416 MO.000 #0.107(

406/

412)*C07 *O.122(

51/

52)*

SEE COLUMN 4 (0.002-0.504)*

(0.018-0.482)*

n a

n r

N i

i l

l l

)

1

.6

Uo

<g 3

Table III-2 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NONITORING PROGRAN

SUMMARY

CRY 0TAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PAlllWAY l

TYPE & NO.

I LLD i

ALL LOCATIONS I NIGHEST HEAN LOCATION i CONTROL LOCATION INRR

>nuaunu*********xu**m********u****xw*************as*****an***xs*x********xc**n****em*****nexa***z*una***

i n

p

-a AIR It411Al ATION

i (PCI/N3) m

.T-131.

416 50.036 kO.410(

1/* 414)mC41 NO.117(

4/

4)*

SEE COLUMN 4 (0.410-0.410)*

(0.015-0.410)*

p i

e 01 4

t

m*

cv Z*

-***s****

O Zw on un He e

e e

U=

2 2

Z Z

Z 2

2 Z

Z C=

E E

E J*

D D

D J

J J

J Ja o

a O

C O

O O

on U

U U

Z8 W

W W

Ze W

W W

W ta.

O*

U3 U3 U3 03 U2 fa U3 fa U3 U*w w

-m*******

CD N

Z*

C*

nm en nn enne en en en em Z

G aC

.r m em amee em

~r e em

~r o m

C C

C m

C C

E CJ N.

C.

ro um 3 g l g,

O C

C C

C

% e N

N e N I N I

% 6

% i N 6

% i U3 I 4*

wm am ma mmmm

<C NO mc

~r* 03 O G3 C

C C

C O

C Z n N Z*

C.

4 4,

m

. O We v8 w$

w$

wSw$

w$

w8 w8 v8 o O N E*

C w

m C

~

m m-O Z *"*

O C

C C

O C

E o

H*

C.

C.e g p gg y y c wm C

C C

C C.

C C

o g C Zn*******

- - - - r Z U w C*

n m

N m

m w

m O x

~a

~r w

w e

~r w

a

~r

~x o W Cs u

u o

o u

u O

U U

C a,,

')

H

~**********************************=************

m, m

o nn en

-n n.,

nn nn nn fT Z

Z NO NN Na N

Nw NM NC NN N>

~

d" O

=

Ov OO P3C P3 C3N 00 P3 e 00 P30

/

E F-(D

O O

O O

y Z*

~J G

C*

O O.

O O

O O.

O O

4 a

-=

NI N

Nt N:

NI NI Nt y

U W

H*

4M ON 4*

NM 00 Na CC On w C3 m O

O O

Q

O O

ao O

C O

o U*

O O

O Z

O O

Z C

O &

on O

O O.

O O

J w J*

O O Z ww ww ww ww ww ww

,w ww 3 <

Jv CU e

w P2 c3 N

O O

O Q

J*

CJ O

O O

C O

O

< c -

O O

O zW z

\\

> 0 w

o O

O O.

O O

O l

J w J

- * = * *

a e a a a a e a a *

m a m a * = * = m

a * * * = * *

a a a s m * * *

m. m a e i

< := Lt.

4 O

C

3

3 O

O O

c M

i H

er M

O O

M C

C C

O Z J >

cm O

O O

W < H Jm O.

O.

O O.

O.

O O.

E H Z J*

O O

Z tD D O >- O

-**mm***=*****************m********************m c=

U U2

- U.

n M

0; U2 33 c3 Z

3 C*

W c::

Z*

J

<r 4

cJ O

O N

H

<>W v

O!

C3 C7 e

C C3 n

e n

C w

de ZJH rJ N

a e

n 4

y U

=

<xw I

I I

i i

I Ld

W UI W

C M

D U3 c

Z Z

g L*

<mo U

=

H m

O U

N Z

N E22.

Hs E<E

<OG

=

000

-*aaaaueaaa2***************ma***aaa2maa*=aaeamem a

Z O*

O I

~

l l-. -

4. d

<* JE 3*

<N Z8 QW g

t-w

~U H Q.

CL.

w 2*.

er =

A*

O O

O Table III-4 4

AIR INHALATION PATHWAY 3

STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/m )

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Control Stations Critical Stations Iodine Analysis Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile I-131

<.010

<.020

<.009

<.014

<.015

<.126 Gross Beta Analysis.029

.12

<.055

<0.11

<0.31

<0.11

<0.31

.086

.251 I

Ganna Analysis Ce-144

.003

.172

<.015

<.030

<.015

<.027 0.018 0.050

[

Ra-226

<.2

.241

<.010

<.009

<.015

<.009

<.002

.004 0.010 Th-232

<.01

.008

<.005

<.004

<.008

<.004

<.008

<.001

<.001 i

E3 1-131

<.07

.004

<.003

<.002

<.004

<.002

<.004

<.0003

<.001 Ba-140

<.01

.016

<.003

<.002

<.004

<.002

<.004

<.001

<.001 Ru-106

.025

.216

<.008

<.010

<.024

<.010

<.023

<.007

<.025 Cs-137

<.01

.013

<.003

<.007

<.003

<.007

.002

.004 Zr-95

.003

.043

<.003

<.012

<.041

<.012

<.042

<.006

<.024 Mn-54

<.01

<.003

<.002

<.004

<.002

<.003

<.001

<.003 Zn-65

<.01

<.005

<.004

<.008

<.004

<.007

<.0003

<.0003 i

K-40

<16.8

<.028

<.023

<.041

<.025

<.038

<.007

<.009 Strontitan Analysis Sr-89

<.0005

<.001

<.003

<.001

<.002

<.008 Sr-90

<.0003

<.001

<.0003

<.001

<.0001

<.0003

c: 0

=v Z0

-=moamaa******

a Z=

0s

-a e

v Hs

<a Z

2 oe I

Os D

D Jn J

J O

O Jw U

U Qs Q:

W W

H=

W W

Z*

CD U3 C*

us w

-m*******msema C

w

.m.

^

%" O N

Zv

~

Cn c

M

-s e

o N

He o

I N OJ O

O E O -

os sd s a D M I

On N i NO U3 1

js N

O O

O III s

O C

e I st) N Zs o

O a

c

. O la s c Q N rs

~~

~

8 O

C Z

=

O We o

O 1 H C*

O O

W O Ww O ::t O Is***mmesammas Z U -

Os O c

-s ts c O W Is e

v Q

C.

M U

U H

-m****====****

3 O

s a

n-y my A

~

m e

me mO y C a

E H

If3 =

o O

c Zs o

3 J

Q C*

O.

7 c.

-s so sI U

W Ws v i mO 4

- M c N

O O

Os O

O O

O H On J -

J*

o o

O Z

~~

3 <

J*

e

~

O O

Js O

O O

O

< C: ~

c W c

=

O

> 0 O

J -

a

===*m***mamass

< C t.L s

ni H

s O

O 2 J >

O*

O O

W < H Ja O

I H 2 Ju O

Z CD C s

O > Q

-s*********m=*

= c U

- U

=

ni C3 M

Z D

C*

W

=

Z*

H 6

O

.b

C::3 C3 D-c D- ~

t t

W*

i C3 C"

=

1s ID

D C!

&a ZZ s

L3 <

-saa=====ma==m s

O a 2 s C s

&=

>c

< P3

<s

C 2n

<N Za 2-

-= ZU 11

<a at

c..

9 O

I m

__m.

)

()

PRECIPITATION PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze precipitation samples.

There are no additional stations for the pathway.

No samples were available in May, June or November due to the lack of sufficient pre-cipitation.

Monthly Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the monthly samples is in Table III-6.

All monthly samples were collected (except as noted above),

and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-7.

The 1981 operational activities of the nuclides determined by gamma analysis were non detectable as were the preoperational and all operational activities to date.

Monthly Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of the monthly precipitation sample is in Table III-8.

All samples were collected (except as noted above), and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evalutaion of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-7.

All of the 1981 operational activity data for tritium were less than the LLDs as were the preoperational,1979 and 1980 operational activities.

O 12

1 R*

R*

O N*

N m******************m*********

I

'/

u Nz O*

I*

T*

A a-C*

On Lau Lx O*

R*

Ta N*

O4 C*************************n**u**

1 I

0 a

/

Nw Y

1 Oz R

3 I*

A

/

Tx M 2 2 A*

M 0 1

Cu U 3 -

O*

S -

1 L*

0 8 M 5 /

N*

A 1

A*

R

. 0 E*

G O /

(*

1 O N 1

R 0

T*

P T S*

E D Ea G K O Hm****************************

N C I

Gz I

O R I*

R D E H*

6 O

P T

Ia*********#*****#**e******m**

1 1

G 1

4 N

1 to I

e M

T S*

l b

R N*

a L

O O*

T A

P Ix C

E T*

I 3 R Aa D

D D

D G

Cm N

N N

4 t

O T O*

L I

L4 O N I

U A L*

D D

L*

t I

A*

A t

R E R V O a

g*en*uanun*nKsun*nnugknunNnun L

I l

i A H F n

T a

7 7

7 5

0 7

N L Y D*

1 1

3 1

E A T L*

M T N L*

N S U

- - u**aa****a*e*nnn*uu**nu*n*u 0 Y O I

1 l

C n

l l

I C

a 6

V S

.n 3

N U

Ou E

N*

O 7

4 l

iT E

1 i

3 3

u 4

D 0

i I

I 3

l 1

1 t

t i

i 6

6 1

C s

S E*

AY A

S S

O N

O i

t C

C C

M Z

C P*

ML I

J I

Ys MA l

T*

Al CA m

mennann*nuNuKnxnnn*n*HnnnDnnE l

1 m

t

O

(

I

T Y*

A A*

I

'I )

Jim t

Pl l

I/

~u l

A*

CI P*

EC pifP t

.a I

i O

Tenie III-7 PRECIPITATION PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysis I-131

<.4

<4.3

<4.3 Ba-140

<10

<4.3

<4.3 Cs-137

<10

<4.3

<4.3 l

Cs-134

<10

<4.3

<4.3 Co-58

<10

<4.3

<4.3 Mn-54

<10

<3.8

<3.8 Zn-65

<20

<7.5

<7.5 O

i Co-60

<10

<4.3

<4.3 Tritium Analysis H.3

<320

<150

<150 l

O 14

Oo (o

O Table 111-8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL [tIVER Uri!T 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITHUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATilWAY l

TYPE 8. NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS I HIGiiEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

- - eenzuun ****munema4******uunm**zens*****s**uxes**************m********<****4

awa****sewu***an-a*****

PRCIP E

E (PCI/L) u TRITIUM AIR a ANALYSIS 36 *

O p

n M

E p

li-3 200 * <LLD(

28/

28)*

h

(

()

SEA WATER PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze sea water sam-ples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Monthly Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of monthly samples is in Table III-9.

All samples were collected and analyzed. Sample Station C14G is the criti-cal station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value.

A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-10.

The concentrations of nuclides by gamma analysis during 1981 were consis-tent with preoperational and operational concentrations for previous years.

Quarterly Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-11.

All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-10.

The concentrations observed in 1981 were consistent with preoperational and O

previous operational concentrations.

Quarterly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The results of the analyses for the quarterly samples of Sr-89 and 90 are presented in Table III-12.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

Sr-89/90 are not critical nuclides in this pathway.

A statistical evalua-tion of operational data is presented in Table III-10.

There are no pre-operational data.

The 1981 Sr-89/90 concentrations are consistent with those of previous operational years.

l l

l C:)

l l

l 16

OO O

o Table III-9 ENVIf10NMENTAL flADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

i CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NQ. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY.Fl.ORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/01-12/31/B1 4

PAlllWAY l

TYPE & NO.

I LLD i

ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INdR 94**o*mununauw*****=*-s****x***s***=***u ses4********=******ms**uu******amans***a=us*******u***an**x*a*

n SEA UA')ER n

- (PCI/KC) n OANNA n

ANALYSIG 72 *

O n

RA-226 13

29(

60/

72)*C14 tin 36{

11/

12)*

30(

52/

60)*

(15-120)*

t 18-120)*

(15-120)*

n n

K 1l{-232 4

12 m 16(

46/

72)*C09

17(

11/

12)*

16(

40/

60)*

n n

n

(

9-26)*

(

9-25)*

(

9-26)*

n n

n K

u n

n I-131 E

6 m 7(

2/

72)*C01

7(

1/

12)*

7(

2/

60)*

n n

(

7-7)*

(

7-7)*

n K

5 n

n llA-140 m

H2

ND

~u n

u n

n u

n HU-106 m

40 m 30(

3/

72)*C01

44(

2/

12)*

44(

2/

60)*

n n

n

(

4-57)*

(

30-57)*

(

30-57)*

n n

n u

n CS-137 m

7 n 6(

7/

72)*C13

7(

1/

12)*

6(

7/

60)*

n

(

4-7)*

(

4-7)*

n u

n n

a n

2R-95 10 m 15(

1/

72)*C14Gu 15(

1/

12)*

O(

O/

60)*

n n

K CS-134 m

7m 13(

5/

72)*C14HE 40(

1/

12)*

2O(

3/

60)*

n n

n

(

1-40)*

(

4-48)u n

u n

n MN-64 6 m 6(

2/

72)*C01

6(

2/

12)*

6(

2/

60)*

(

5-6)*

(

5-6)*

(

5-6)*

n a

p n

u n

-a n

2N-65 13 m NI) n p

n an 4

n 1-40 m

57 m 276(

72/

72)*C13

ala(

12/

12)*

269(

60/

60)*

K

(43-398)*

(

170-385)*

(

117-398)*

O O

O Table III-10 SEA WATER PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Control Stations Critical Stations Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 PercentTie Gansna Analysis Ra-226 600

<24.5

<25.1

<57.5

<26.2

<59.4

<19.9

<47.0 Th-232 7

<12.5

<11.5

<25.0

<12.1

<25.8

<9.1

<21.0 I-131*

<.4

<1.75

<l.7

<3.6

<l.7

<3.8

<l.5

<2.4 Ba-140

<10 11

<5.75

<5.5

<7.9

<5.4

<8.0

<5.8

<7.3 Ru-106

<13.5

<13.0

<26.0

<13.3

<27.3

<12.0

<17.9 5

Cs-137*

<10 10

<2.0

<2.1

<4.7

<2.2

<4.9

<l.6

<2.6 Zr-95

<10

<2.8

<2.7

<5.9

<2.5

<3.8

<3.5

<10.8 Cs-134*

<10

<1.8

<2.6

<13.4

<2.7

<l4.5

<2.0

<4.0 Mn-54

<10

<l.5

<1.6

<3.1

<1.6

<3.2

<1.5

<2.3 Zn-65

<20 7

<3.5

<3.3

<5.1

<3.3

<5.0

<3.3

<5.7 K-40 150.8 368.7 276 276 415 269 398 308 488 Strontium Analysis l

Sr-89

<l.0

<2.3

<8.8

<2.6

<9.6 (0.7

<2.1 I

Sr-90

<.25

<0.6

<2.4

<0.6

<2.6 0.3

<1.2 Tritium Analysis 4

H-3 71 87

<98.4 <218.8

<681.9

<220.8

<695.7

<206.8

<654.4

Critical nuclides for critical station.

00 O

C)

Table III-ll ENVIRONHENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NONITORING PROGRAN

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL ftIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITflUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/01-12/31/81 PATilWAY l

TYPIE & NO.

I LLD i

ALL LOCATIONS l HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR o *

n e *

x u g e z e n *

m a n n u z * * * * *

u * * * * * * * * *

s

4 * < *

u :t a m *

w m e n s *

u * * * * * *

m u s u u d m *

u * *

4 u d e s

u e *

s w a n a u x * *

4

p u

SEA UA'IER E

(l'C I /KO )

THITIUN

ANALYSIS 24

n

O n

p a

p M

11-3 3'76 m 646(

S/

24)*C13

843(

1/

4)*

SEE COLUMN 4 i

w

(

S31-843)*

i C

1 4

00 O

Table III-12 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAtt

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITpus COUNTY, FLORIDA flEPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 P AlllWAY l

TYPE t< NO.

I LLD i

ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAll LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR s

w c * *

w s o m 4 *

s a m * *

x 4

s g * *

u *

n s * * *

n n * * * * < *

u m e x 4 *

n e n e e u n u m * * * *

s * *

n e u -a a m u +s -4 4 v 4

m *

u a m * *

n 2 * * * *

4

n n

SEA UAlE R n

u (PCI/KC)

SR-89/90 u

u n

m

ANALYSIS 24

m

O n

m 2

6f t-90 1

1 #

2(

6/

24)*C14Mn 4(

1/

4)*

SEE COLUMN 4 u

u

(

1-4)*

u u

E N

E Sft-U9 3 #

5(

6/

24 ) M C 14(1 E 8(

2/

4)*

SEE COLUMN 4

(

1-16)*

(

1-16)*

E$

O aivra watea a^ Taw ^v The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze river water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Quarterly Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-13.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-14.

Neither preoperational nor operational samples have had detectable activities present within the required LLDs.

Quarterly Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-15.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-14.

Neither preoperational nor operational samples have had detectable activities present within the required LLDs.

I O

l 21 i

00 6

d Table III-13 Et4VIRONMENT AL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL HIVER UrJIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COutJTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PAlHUAY l

TYPE & NO.

I LLD 1

ALL LOCATIONS 1 HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION ItJRR, '

- - 2**2ws*******m*****x****ma*****x***e=*a1*****=us**g*m****xs***********v**mn***es*********4**aan*****-

u-u RIVER WATER n

a u

(PCI/KG)

CAMMA

AtJALYSIS 4 m a

O n

u x

n E

a n

I-131 17 m ND a

n u

n n

13 A-140 17

ND u

u a

a n

n CD-58 m

17 m ND 2

n CS-337 17

ND n

a n

n n

CS-134 17 m ND lj u

-n n

M E

NN-54 15 m ND u

a u

n u

u ZN-65 30 2 ND u

CD-60 17 m ND n

s

_ _ _.. _ ~,

()

Table III-14 RIVER WATER PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg) 4 Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysis I-131

<.4

<4.3

<4.3 i

Ba-140

<10

<4.3

<4.3 Co-58

<10

<4.3

<4.3 1

Cs-137

<10

<4.3

<4.3 Cs-134

<10

<4.3

<4.3 Mn-54

<10

<3.8

<3.8 t

(:)

Zn-65

<20

<7.5

<7.5 Co-60

<10

<4.3

<4.3 Tritium Analysis H-3

<320

<150

<150 I

f I

l l

23

Oo to 6

Table 111-15 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL PIONITORING PROGRAtt

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL HIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 P ATilWAY I

TYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR co*****use******uses*******as********s***x1*4*u*as**ut*****nux**e**u*****r******nt************zwa***as u

e RIVER HATER r

(PCI/KC)

TRITIUM

f.NALYSIB 4 *

O u

a u

u ll-3 200 * <LLD(

4/

4)*

M i

()

GROUND WATER PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze ground water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of semiannual samples is in Table III-16.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data is presented in Table III-17.

All operational samples had no detectable activity and there are no preoperational data.

Semiannual Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of semiannual samples is in Table 111-18. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statisti-cal evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table III-17.

All operational samples had no detectable activity and there are no preopera-tional data.

O O

25

k Table III-16 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL ftIVER Ur4IT 3 DOCKEl NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUt4TY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/S1-12/31/S1 P ATilWAY I

TYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS I It! CHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR ocanuen*nemne******se4a***tuunsm**u*******4s*****u*********nungm***uemmuages**44*4e4***xa*<*****tus**4*

W W

GROUT 4D WATER K

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA

Af4ALYSIS 2*

O i

n n

i u

a I

n I-131 17

ND n

E N

u HA-140 17

ND n

a w

w N

E E

CO-UU 17

ND n

CS-137 17 u ND u

se n

m n

CS-134 17

ND m

n a

a e

a

[

u a

n n

MN-34 15

ND n

u K

u ZN-6b 30

ND n

u a

u E

CD-60 m

17

ND h

i J

4

([])

Table III-17 4

GROUND WATER PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg) i Nuclide Operational Values Mean 95 Percentile-i Gamma Analysis I-131

<4.3

<4.3 Ba-140

<4.3

<4.3 j

Co-58

<4.3

<4.3 i

Cs-137

<4.3

<4.3 i

Cs-134

<4.3

<4.3 Mn-54

<3.8

<3.8 i

Zn-65

<7.5

()

Co-60

<4.3

<4.3 Tritium Analysis H-3

<150

<150 e

4 k

I 1

l i

+

9 I

([)>

i j

27 I.

00 0

Table III-18 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATilWAY l

TYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS l HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR y o 4 e c o * * * *

4 * *

n * *

s u s * * *

x a * * * * * * * * * * * * < * < z -4 *

u.a z * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

a u * * * * < *

1

4 * * *

x e g z * * *

i n * *

4

D W

GROUND WATER E

(idC I /KG )

TRITION

-n n ANALYSIS 2*

u

O u

E E

l t-3 200 E <Lt.D(

2/

2)*

l$

()

POTABLE WATER PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze potable water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Quarterly Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-19.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a com-parison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-20.

The 1981 operational activity was generally less than the preoperational activ-ity levels end consistent with previous operational years' activities.

Quarterly Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of the quarterly samples is in Table 111-21.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-20.

All sample activities were less than the sample LLD or non-detectable.

1 i

O 29

r-n

(~d

(

Table III-19 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL HIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITilUS COUNTY, FLORIDA flEPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 1

PATHWAY I

TYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS I HICHEST MEAT 1 LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR c o a *

e n v * * * * * * * * * *

a n a

u * * *

s * * *

a m m e n * * *

1 s *

a s e s *

m a * * *

m *

z z e * *

u * * *

4 u u t e n 4 4 * -= < 4

m * -a * *

t n

PO'I. WATER M

(PCI/KU)

GAMMA IhCESTION

ANALYSIS 12

u

O n

u R

5 n

I-131 7*

7(

1/

12)*C10

7(

1/

4)*

SEE COLUMt1 4 r,

n u

a IIA-140 22 m 33(

1/

12)*C18 7 33(

1/

4)*

SEE COLUMN 4 u

u y

E M

E u

CS-137 7 u 7(

2/

12)*C10

7(

2/

4)*

SEE COLUMN 4 r.-

a

(

7-7)*

(

7-7)*

u e

m G

p C8-134 m

7 p 6(

2/

12)*C18

8(

1/

41-2 SEE COLUMN 4 u

(

4-8)*

u a

a mo a

n n

CO-50 u

6 u ND n

u n

M K

MN-54 n

6*

6(

1/

12)*CO7

6(

1/

4)*

SEE COLUMN 4 u

u a

E R

E E

ZN-6b 14

ND u

n n

u x

n CD-60 6 m 6(

1/

12)*C10

6(

1/

4)>

SEE COLUMN 4

1

( )

Table III-20 P0 TABLE WATER PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile 2

Gamma Analysis I-131

<.4

<2.0

<2.2

<5.3 Ba-140

<10

<5.5

<7.8

<23.6 Cs-137

<10

<2.0

<2.6

<6.7 2

Cs-134

<10

<1.9

<2.5

<6.2 Co-58

<10

<1.25

<1.4

<2.3 Mn-54

<10

<1.5

<1.8

<4.5 Zn-65

<20

<3.5

<3.4

<5.4 O

Co-60

<10

<1.5

<1.9

<4.6 Tritium Analysis H-3

<320

<320 98.4

<158

<390 0

31

b F.

O Table 111-21 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER Ut1IT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATilWAY l

TYPE & NO.

I LLD i

ALL LOCATIONS l HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

* * *

e a * * * * * * *

m * * * *

x

w e * * * * * * * * * * * * *

a a

t i 4 * *

n * *

w * *

x *

n n a * * * * * * * * *

x u * * *

4

4 -c * * * * * *

x x u *

n -x * * * *

x e E

M POT. UNI ER n

x (PCI/KG)

TRITIUM u

ANALYSIS 12 *

O n

u n

n 11-3 396 * <LLD(

3/

12)*

r 4

O saoae't"E exTea"^' seoise"T e^ Taw ^v The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze shoreline ex-ternal sediment samples.

There are no additional stations for this path-way.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-22.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

The critical stations for this analysis are Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a umparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-23.

The 1981 operational data show nuclide concentrations generally lower than the preoperational data and consistent previous years' operational data.

Semiannual Sr-90 Arialysis The summary for the strontium analysis of the semiannual samples are in Table III-24.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

The critical stations are Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G and no sample had activi-ty greater than 10 times the control station value.

A statistical evalua-tion of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-23.

There are no preoperational data and the 1981 data show a slight increase in Sr-90 con entration, in this pathway, over previous years' concentra-tions.

l O

33

Oo Cg t(3 Table III-22 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRY 8TAL RIVER Ut1IT 3 POCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PAlllWAY l

TYPE 6 NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

* *

u -a * * *

n u n a a g * *

a a * * * * *

u s * * * *

n

a u *

x * * * * *

a x 4 * * * *

a *

n u m u * * * * * * * * *

w * * * * * * * *

4 * *

a * * *

a * *

a * * * * *

u N

Dor. SED.

u n

n m

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA u

SHORELINE EXT u ANALY818 10 e u

O u-n n

u 4

n RA-226 m

14

313(

10/

10)*C14Hu 506(

2/

2)*

181(

4/

4)*

n u

(78-524)*

(

488-524)*

(78-261)*

n g

n u

n Tli-232 16 u 67(

6/

10)*C14H*

86(

2/

2)*

58<

4/

4)*

n

(43-105)*

a

(66-105)*

(

43-72)*

n u

x E

H n

I-131 2

7*

ND u

16 IJA-140 23 n 16(

1/

10)*C14Mn 16(

1/

2)*

O(

O/

4)*

n u

n me 4

R u

110-106 n

49 u 46(

1/

10)MC09

46(

1/

2)*

46(

1/

4)*

n u

n CS-137 m

7n 13(

4/

10)*C01

17(

1/

2)*

14(

2/

4)*

(

10-17)u

(

11-17)*

E E

n N

n ZR-95 11 n 14(

4/

10)*C14He 16(

1/

2)*

13(

3/

4)*

(

7-18)*

(

7-18)*

n n

CS-134 5

6

8(

6/

10)*C14HE 15(

1/

2)*

7(

3/

4)*

n

(

5-15)*

(

5-8)*

n n

u n

n NN-54 6

6(

1/

10)mC01

6(

1/

2)*

6(

1/

4)*

n n

n ZN-65 13 n ND n

p u

u n

K-40 56 n 188(

10/

10)*Cl4H*

275(

2/

2)*

197(

4/

4)*

p i

n

(67-291)*

(

259-291)n

(67-242)*

O O

O Table III-23 SHORELINE EXTEflNAL SEDIMENT PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pC1/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Oper4tional Values Control Stations Critical Stations Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ganina Analysis

~

Mean 95 Percentile kan 95 Percentile Ra-226 2900 10,000 336.5 312.5 580.3 180.8 329.4 400.3 564.3 Th-232 90 300

<49.5

<41.8

<112.7 57.8 81.2

<31.1

<117.2 1-131

<.4 34

<l.6

<l.8

<2.7

<1.6

<2.5

<l.9

<2.8 Ba-140

<10

<6.4

<7.1

<13.7

<5.3

<7.9

<8.3

<15.9 I

Ru-106 190 690

<13.0

<16.1

<37.6

<20.0

<54.3

<13.4

<20.3

.i w

m Cs-137*

<10 250

<3.8

<6.2

<18.3

<7.8

<22.7

<5.1

<15.8 Zr-95 12' 40

<3.5

<6.8

<19.5

<10.2

<23.3

<5.0

<15.7 Cs-134*

<10

<5.0

<5.6

<14.1

<5.4

<10.8

<5.7

<15.7 Mn-54

<10 19

<1.6

<2.0

<4.9

<2.5

<7.1

<l.7

<2.6 Zn-65

<3.4

<4.8

<3.0

<4.1

<3.6

<5.2 K-40 259.8 1,006 1M 188 333 194 360 183 326 Strontiun Analysis Sr-90

<36.0

<65.4

<252.8

<39.8 (56.0 (82.5

<326.8

Critical nuclides for critical station

O O O

~C3 Table 111-24 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MotJITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL [tIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET No. '30-302 CITRUS COUNTY.Ft.ORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATHUAY I

TYPE & NO.

I LLD I

ALL LOCATIONS l HIGHEBT MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR o a 4 c c o m u *

s u m * *

n *

a n * * * * * *

u * * * * * * * * * *

4 m m a 4

u * * * *

u n n a * * * *

u * * * * * * * * * * -a x * * * *

a 4 s * * * * *

u e x

4

a x -a u s a t *

DOT.DED p

(PCI/KO)

DR-90 a

EliORELItJE EXT

ANALYSIS 10

z

0 SR-90 33

B6(

7/

10)*C14H*

330(

1/

2)1 43(

3/

4)*

(18-330)*

(

38-50)*

SEA FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY (MARINE PLANTS)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze marine plants in the sea food chain.

There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gama analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-25.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-26.

The 1981 operational concentrations are generally less than the preopera-tional concentrations and are consistent with previous operational years' concentrations.

Semiannual Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The sumary of analysis of the quarterly samples for Sr-89 and Sr-90 is presented in Table III-27.

Due to a laboratory error, the samples for the second half of 1981 were not analyzed in time to provide meaningful Sr-89 results.

All other samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data is presented in Table III-26.

There are no preoperational data.

O i

i i

O 37

t l

(.

Table 111-25 i

l l

ENVIRONMENI'AL RADIOLOGICAL mot 4ITORING PROGRAtt

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET t40 50-302 CITidUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PAlllWAY l

TYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I cot 4 TROL LOCATION I Nrt R,

- - nna*u*=***nusuun*u.a*****sanm**ma**s*44**4xan-an*********nua**u******* amen **+a+=m*****m4*m=*a4a******

I!

n 4

MAR)tlE PLAtlT n

n n

PCI/itO n OAN11A u

u EEAFilOD Cll41tJ

AtlALYSIS 4*

u a

O n

n u

n n

u RA-226 lb u 115(

4/

4)*C29

170(

2/

2)x SEE COLUl4N 4 E

u n

(59-219)*

(

120-219)*

n u

n n

111-232 14

46(

4/

4)mC29

60 (.

2/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 n

n n

(

27-93)*

(

27-93)4 n

n n

n I-131 m

7u ND a

n n

u a

n a

n u

x n

ll/r-14 0 n

20 n ND a

n n

n M

N u

u (IU-106 u

63 n ND n

n n

n CS-137 7 n 14(

4/

4)mC29

18(

2/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 n

x

(

7-22)*

(

14-22)*

n u

n n

n ZR-93 n

12 m 138(

4/

4)*C29

214(

2/

2)x SEE COLUl1N 4 n

u a

(11-402)*

(26-402)*

n n

n u

n n

(11t-04 7 u ND n

u n

i K

u n

E ZN-6b n

16

ND n

n n

n

.x K-40 m

77 n 2004(

4/

4)*C30

2295(

2/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 a

n n

n

(

765-3460)*

( 1300- 3210)*

a b

()

Table III-26 MARINE PLANT PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysis Ra-226 624 3300 90.5 114.8 261.9 Th-232 280 31.0 80.1 207.4 I-131

<10 37

<1.9

<1.8

<2.8 Ba-140

<10 75

<6.8

<6.9

<11.4 Ru-106 360

<16.0

<15.7

<24.5 Cs-137

<10 181

<13.0 13.8 26.0 Zr-95 18 157 70.0 138.3 494.3 O

43

<1.8

<1.7

<2.4 Mn-54 Zn-65 156

<4.0

<3.9

<5.69 K-40 1508.4 12570 2295.0 2203.8 4818.6 Strontium Analysis Sr-89

<1.3

<5.9 Sr-90

<0.6

<0.8

<2.52 O

39

)

Table III-27 ENVIRONTlEN1AL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORIl1G PROGRAli

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/01 PAlilWAY l

TYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS l HIGNEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR a s a e v e a u a a a 4 * *

a m * *

u a 4 x

v u e s * *

u * * * * * * * < n 1 a * * * *

u d

u u * * * * *

n * * * * * *

u s -z *-x * * * * * *

4 4 * *

a w * * = = x -4 * *

a * *

d 4

M n

4 MAR. PiANT e

(PCI/KC) u BRB9/90 SEAFOOD Cij.

ANALYSIB 4m n

0 u

u a

n M

4:-

GR-UY O n 2(

2/

2)nC29

4(

1/

1)4 SEE COLUl1N 4 p

a u

(

0-4)*

n u

N k

n GR-90 0

1(

2/

2)*C29

2(

1/

1)*

SEE COLUMN 4 n

n n

(

O-2)u E

O t"ots'to" ca^8 e^T" war The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze crabs.

There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the edible portion of semiannual sam-pies is in Table III-28.

All samples were collected and analyzed. -Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-29.

Except for naturally occurring K-40, the 1981 operational concentrations are less than the preoperational concentrations and consistent with previ-ous years' operational concertrations.

I O

O 41

. _ ~.

Table

-28 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITOR!i4G PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL ftIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATHWAY I

TYPE t< NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS i HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR o4**nussnma***nus***a*****xus**xnume******zsan**z**u**ma****sununnu****zu**au*eas**** nam **uu****xa**4*

n n

u ERAl:8 r,

n 6PCI/KG)

GAMMA u

INGESTION n ANALYSIO 4 W u

uO n

u u

n n

E n

H6-226 13 u 96(

4/

4)mC30

97(

2/

2)*

97(

2/

2)*

n

(83-110)*

(

B3-110)*

n n

u 4

n a

y r,

TH-232 12 a 16(

3/

4)*C30

20(

1/

2)*

20(

1/

2)*

u t

(

14-20)*

s n

n

-u n

I-131 N

O u ND n

n n

u UA-140 24

ND u

u u

n u

a HU-106 b3 2 ND n

u a

n u

u u

CS-137 7 p 6(

1/

4)nC30

6(

1/

2)*

6(

1/

2)*

u n

n Z[t-90 u

11 u ND u

n CS-134 7m ND n

u n

u MN-04 6

ND n

a u

u u

ZN-65 lb

ND n

n n

u n

A n

K-40 U2

2293(

4/

4)*C30

243S(

2/

2)* 243S(

2/

2)*

n

( 2000- 2470)*

( 2400- 2470)*

a

O O

O Table 111-29 INGESTION CRAB PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Control Stations Critical Stations Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Mean 9Nrcentile Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 1325 3600

%.0

%.3 122.3

%.5 133.9 96.0 121.0 Th-232 92 170

<14.5

<13.3

<26.4

<12.0

<34.2 14.5 15.9 l-131*

<10

<1.9

<2.8

<2.0

<3.4

<1.9

<2.3 Ba-140

<10 55

<5.8

<6.1

<8.5

<6.4

<10.2

<5.8 (7.1 8

Ru-106 1

<12.4

<13.2

<18.2

<14.1

<21.4

<12.3

<15.0 Cs-137*

<10 75

<2.1

<2.9

<7.0

<4.1

<9.3

<1.8

<2.5 Zr-95

<10 13

<5.3

<2.6

<3.2

<2.6

<3.7

<2.6

<3.0 Cs-134*

<10

<1.6

<l.8

<2.5

<1.9

<2.9

<1.6

<2.0 Mn-54

<80 24

<1.4

<1.9

<1.5

<2.2

<1.4

<1.8 Zn-65

<160 127

<3.6

<3.7

<4.5

<3.8

<5.2

<3.6

<4.0 K-40 1424.6 2011.2 2350 2293 2699 2435' 2532 2150 2566

Critical nuclides for critical station

INGESTION CARNIV0ROUS FISH PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze carnivorous fish. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the edible portion of semiannual sam-ples is in Table III-30.

All samples were collected and analyzed. Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-31.

The operational concentrations for 1981 are generally less than the pre-operational concentrations and consistent with previous years' operational concentrations.

i O

t

{

1 44

0o Table 111-30 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL filVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/01 PAlllWAY I

TYPE F4 NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS l HIGHEST HEAN LOCATION l CONTHOL LOCATION lt4RR oc4aunaw*nu4****unnena******u*x*xanm**u*xx24*****s**u*****maxa**n*******au*amus44*a4****manex**xeu***4*

n u

n C.

FItill n

n n

(PCI/KG) n OAMMA k

k It4GESTION u ANALYSIH 4

u

O u

n n

n E

u RA-226 15 u 105(

4/

4)*C29

154(

2/

2)*

57(

2/

2)*

(47-171)m

(

136-171)u

(

47-66)*

n u

li 5

E n

Til-232 n

13 u 23(

4/

4)*C30

27(

2/

2)*

27(

2/

2)*

u

(

14-31)*

(

23-31)*

(

23-31)*

u n

u o

u n

I-131 O u ND u

u n

ll A-14 0 u

25 m ND r

u n

n b

E N

k RU-106 n

60 u ND n

u n

u m

n n

CS-137 7*

24(

4/

4)*C29

20(

2/

2)*

21(

2/

2)*

(

11-31)*

(

26-2914

(

11-31)*

n n

K n

ZR-95 12 #

ND n

u n

n CS-134 O u 9(

1/

4)*C30

9(

1/

2)*

9(

1/

2)*

n n

u x

R M

n n

MN-D4 u

7 u ND e

u n

Sc E

ZN--6b 17 n ND n

n E

R u

K-40 u

CR n 2688(

4/

4)*C29

3315(

2/

2)* 2060(

2/

2)*

l n

( 1830- 3380)*

( 3250- 3380)*

( 1830- 2290)*

n e

O O

O i

Table 111-31 1

INGESTION CARNIV0ROUS FISH PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Control Stations Critical Stations Median

% Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 335 2400 101.0 105.0 219.31 56.5 82.8 153.5 202.0 l

Th-232 92 23.5 23.0 36.68 27.0 38.1 19.0 32.9 l

l-131*

<10

<1.9

<l.9

<2.41

<2.0

<2.7

<1.9

<2.3 Ba-140

<10 72

<6.3

<8.15

<5.9

<7.6

<6.8

<8.9 M

Ru-106

<14.9

<15.1

<19.88

<13.5

<17.0

<16.6

<21.1 Cs-137*

<10 43 40.5 24.3 42.03 21.0 48.7 27.5 31.7 Zr-95

<10 12

<2.9

<3.90

<2.6

<3.6

<3.1

<4.1 Cs-134*

<10

<2.3

<3.8

<10.65

<5.3

<l5.7

<2.3

<2.9 Mn-54

<80

<1.6

<1.7

<2.16

<1.6

<2.0

<1.8

<2.5 Zn-65

<160 99

<4.3

<4.3 (5.90

<3.6

<4.6

<4.9

<5.9 K-40 2346.4 3854.8 2770 2688 4158 2060 2698 3315 3495 l

Critical nuclides for critical station L

1

INGESTION HERBIV0ROUS FISH PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze herbivorous fi sh. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The sumary for the gema analysis of the edible portion of semiannual sam-ples is in Table III-32.

No samples were caught during the first semi-annual period at the critical location C29.

All other samples were collected and analyzed.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparienn with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-33.

The 1981 operational concentrations are generally lower than preoperational concentrations and are consistent with previous years' operational concen-trations.

l l

l i

47

20 tr

O Zo

-c0CCCCCCCCCC000000000000CCC00CC000000CC000 a

nn en nn n

~~

Zu NN N c3 N4 N

NO on w

w

~

0~

mn N

Q O

/

-e on NI

%i Nl Nl O*

N-NT NT NO JW T

N 4

n

-Q Ju a

ce g*

ww ww ww w

ww H*

W W

D T

C Z*

0-P3 N

O*

W O*

CU t

-*****************************************5!r a) m-a m

N Z*

NN N

Os v

c c3 m=

N H*

I OJ OJ I O

Ov NI N

N N

N D M I C*

Nw

.-e rn i -

_J

t-O (I!

I o N Z*

c

. O L1J s ww w

w w

0 C N Z*

e C3 M

e C

O Z

0-C3 C2 a

0 c:

O l-

N c.

H U3 s T

lit C W*

O % C Is*****************************************

Z U -

On M

C all Me O

0-O D*

a: Q W Z*

P3 O!

W M

D3 O

Q.

O O

O H

w O

aa aa aa a

aa N

Z Z

ON OM OM M

CO O

~

9-e 0

0 d

E H

03

Ol

^

, O m

Z*

v Y.-.

J a

a*

a.,

mm NI NI NI N

NI 3

O W

H?

03

OT CT CIC o

w O m t

CJ C

C3 c

Q c

C 0

m O

O*

Z Z

Z.

Z 0

fa O

l--

C*

J ~

J7 C O

=

ww

~~

ww w

O <

J?

O' O

e O

Q Q

b C3 GI S

< c -

<m O

% til E

?

CI

.'.> Q

,,,)

- * * * * * *

a m a s = a a a m * * = m * * * * * * *

2 2 m.* * *

c :s * * * *

J

< C LA.

T C3 C

C C

h N

.N N

N 4

Z J >

cm N

n 0-W < H I H Z

.J W Z 03 D c > c

-**mm***********

mum ************************

Z O*.

U M

U

=

T 03 i

[

Z 3

C*

W c:

Z*

0 fu O

4 N

e H

UI N

C T

C C3 0

03 e

a m

.5 m CJ N

CT

-+

~

C*

n 4

O O

y U3 i

1 I

I I

I e

til

I I

3 03

=

C3 Z

Z l

0. 2 EJ

=

P-w 3

=

U N

U Z

N

=c

>=

Z<

<Z O<

u

-

4

2

3 *

2 Mr

m 3 2

2 * * :.8

2 MB C 2

4 * $ $ 1 * * *

2 2

2 2

2 2 O'

3

>S E

aC Zu Z *J M Zk m%H r- * - N C3

<=

A-W Q. nr UC 3.Z

[ww 40 l

O O

O Table 111-33 INGESTION HERBlV0R005 FISH PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg) i l

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values l

Control Stations Critical Stations l

Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Single Value I

Ra-226

%0 3100 49.0 79.0 194.7 94.0 240.9 49.0

.j Th-232 84 38.0 35.0 54.3 33.5 59.8 38.0 1-131*

<10

<2.0

<2.1

<2.8

<2.1

<3.1

<2.0 Ba-140

<10 50

<7.0

<6.9

<10.1

<6.9

<11.4

<7.0 ds Ru-106 90

<15.3

<14.5

<21.2

<14.1

<23.5

<15.3 Cs-137*

<10 110

<16.0 21.0 41.5 15.0 17.8 33.0 Zr-95

<10 9

<3.3

<3.0

<4.3

<2.9

<4.6

<3.3 Cs-134*

<10

<2.0

<5.8

<19.7

<7.8

<25.1

<2.0 e

Mn-54

<80

<1.8

<1.7

<2.4

<1.6

<2.7

<1.8 Zn-65

<160 63

<4.5

<4.3

<6.0

<5.6

<3.9

<5.0 K-40 2178.8 3100.6 3290 3070 5645 2475 4734 4260

Critical nuclides for critical station i

INGESTION OYSTERS PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze oysters.

There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gama analysis of the edible portion of semiannual samples is in Table 111-34.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with tne preoperational data is presented in Table III-35.

The 1981 operational concentrations are consistent with previous years' operational and generally lower than the preoperational concentrations.

l O

l l

O l

50 1

.~. --

. + -. -.. - -,., -,..

O O

<O Table III-34 Et4VIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORINO PROGRAt1

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL ltIVER UrlIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITitUS COUNTY Ft.ORIDA REPORTINO PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATilUAY l

TYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

*

4 * *

u n 4 * > * * * * * * *

m *

4 * * *

u n n s *

w n * *

a * * *

4

m u s * *

s * *

s *

n u x 4 * * *

m a x x x

x * -a m u 4 * *

u 4 * * * * * * * * *

s t z * * *

4

n OYS~1EHB E

n u

(PCI/MO) n GAMMA 4

,^

INCESTIOil u ANALYSIO 4*

O n

N HA-226 15 n 100(

4/

4)mC30

100(

2/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 u

n n

(66-120)*

(

104-1113n 161-232 14

22(

3/

4)*C29

26(

1/

2)n SEE COLUMN 4 E

u n

(

14-26)*

n n

I-131 ll n ND n

n u

K n

M

{

n

!! A-140 m

20

ND n

a u

a U

n n

u 11U-106 m

60 m 73(

1/

4)*C29

7D(

1/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 n

n n

F CS-13'/

n 9 m NI) n rr n

n n

ZR-90 12 n 13(

2/

4)*C29

15(

1/

2)u SEE COLUMN 4 n

(

10-15)*

u if 5

a Nti-04 6 n ND n

n n

ZtJ-6b n

16

NI) n K-n n

n n

n K-40 4

65 n 120S(

4/

4)*C30

1305(

2/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 n

4 m

( 1100- 1360)*

( 1250- 1360)*

Table III-35

{}

INGESTION OYSTERS PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pci/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile 534 107.5 100.3 146.8 Ra-226

<20.0

<17.3

<38.9 Th-232 I-131

<10

<1.9

<2.0

<2.7 Ba-140

<10

<6.6

<7.0

<9.9 82

<19.9

<31.9

<88.8 Ru-106 Cs-137

<10

<2.0

<2.1

<3.1 Zr-95

<10

<6.6

<7.7

<19.3 Mn-54

<80

<1.5

<1.6

<2.3

()

Zn-65

<160 33

<3.9

<5.4 1843.6 1180 1205 1448 K-40 4

C:)

i 52

[

INGESTION SHRIMP PATHWAY _

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze shrimp. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The sumary for the gama analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-36. All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no crit-ical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-37.

I The 1981 operational concentrations are consistent with previous years' l

operational and preoperational concentrations.

The second nalf sample was collected in the vicinity of the discharge canal rather than the Ralston Purina facility.

This is because the Ralston Purina facility is no longer operating.

This collection method will replace Station C27 for this pathway.

O 1

I a

O 53

CO Q1 CD Table Ill-36 ENVIllONMENl AL RADIOLOGICAL MOtJITORIt1G PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL [(IVER UrJIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 l

PNI'llWAY I

TYPE & NO.

I LLD 1

ALL LOCATIONS l HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR z e ** z a q u e a n n e m = * *

e n ** n * * * *

u n * * * *

n n a n 4 * *

z *

m *

x

n * * *

e n * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

m

a n ** 4 4* a * * * *

z

m

4

n n a z e a d *

n y

u SHRINP E

(PCI/KG)

OAMMA u

It4GESTIOt1

At1ALYSIS 2*

O u

a n

n a

n n

HA-226 17

159(

2/

2)mC27

159(

2/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 u

(57-261)*

n e

u n

a n

u 1ll-232 15 m SB(

2/

2)MC27

S8(

2/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 u

(

34-81)*

(

34-81)*

n u

u p

I-131 On ND u

n n

HA-140 27

ND n

a n

7 N

n HU-106 60

ND n

n n

US-137 9

14(

2/

2)mC27

14(

2/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 n

u n

(

11-16)*

(

11-16)*

n n

a a

z n

u u

2R-95 J3 n ND u

u a

D MN-54 0*

ND n

u E

n ZN-6b 10 m ND n

u n

K-4J 89 u 281S(

2/

2)*C27

281S(

2/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 w

( 2490- 3140)*

( 2490- 314014

. - _ - = _.

f Table III-37 INGESTION SHRIMP PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile 159.0 159.0 441.7 Ra-226 36 57.5 57.5 122.6 Th-232 I-131

<10

<1.9

<2.2 Ba-140

<10

<6.6

<8.4 4

<16.9

<21.4 Ru-106 Cs-137

<10 37 13.5 13.5 20.4 Zr-95

<10

<3.3

<3.9 Mn-54

<80

<1.9

<2.2

()

Zn-65

<160

<4.5

<4.5 K-40 921.8 2514 2815 2815 3716

)

i l

t 55 I

- - - - ~..

- ~.

l

(])

INGESTION MILX PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze milk.

There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Monthly Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the monthly samples is in Table III-35.

The samples at Sample Station C49, the critical station for this pathway, were not collected due to the unavailability of milk.

All other samples were collected and analyzed. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-39.

The 1981 operational concentrations are consistent with previous years' operational, and lower than the preoperational concentrations.

Monthly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The summary for the strontium analysis of monthly samples is in Table 111-40. All samples were collected and analyzed.

Sample Station C49 is the critical station for this pathway and no samples were collected due to the unavailability of milk. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-39.

C.

The 1981 operational concentrations are less than the preoperational values and are consistent with other operational concentrations.

O 56

'O O

O Table 111-38 ENVIROtJMEN1 AL RADIOLOGICAL HOrJITORING PROGRAM SUHNARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 P A~Il dJAY l

TYPE & HO.

I LLO I

ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST HEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

- - - max ***a*****seman****nuz*********uu****u****ze**u***n*****a*********auena*4an*ae****as*********a***

u a

3 HILK (PCI/L)

CAMMA INCESTInti n AtJALYSIB 24

u

O u

n n

I-131 7 n ND u

a a

n a

w n

UA-140 2D

ND n

1 E

ll CS-137 9*

12(

S/

12)*C47 e 12(

S/

12)*

12(

5/

12)*

E

(

9-14)*

(

9-14)*

(

9-14)*

I u

n M

ZR-93 13

ND n

a u

a CS-134 9*

ND e

wu n

u n

CO-DO 7 m ND u

a n

x Hil-54 7

ND w

ij n

CO-60 O w 7(

1/

12)*C47

7(

1/

12)*

7(

1/

12)*

i l

I

O O

O Table 111-39 INGESTION MILK PATHWAY i

STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Control Stations Critical Stations Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Mean 9_5 Percentile Mean 95 PercentTle Ganna Analysis i

1-131*

<10

<1.8

<l.7 2.0

<1.7

<2.0 NC/M NC/M Ba-140

<30

<6.3

<6.2

<8.1

<6.2

<8.1 NC/M NC/M Cs-137 16 22

<2.8

<6.3

<l5.8

<6.3

<l5.8 NC/M NC/M i

Zr-95

<20

<3.3

<4.1

<3.3

<4.1 NC/M NC/M i

Cs-134

<10

<2.3

<2.2

<2.8

<2.2

<2.8 NC/M NC/M Mn-54

<10

<2.0

<1.9

<2.5

<1.8

<2.1 NC/M NC/M Co-58

<10

<l.8

<1.8

<2.1

<1.9

<2.5 NC/M NC/M 3

Co-60

<10

<2.3

<2.6

<5.4

<2.6

<5.4 NC/M NC/M Strontium Analysis Sr-89

<1.8

<8.1

<35.4

<8.1

<35.4 NC/M NC/M 4

Sr-90 4.0 6.0

<2.5

<6.8

<2.5

<6.8 NC/M NC/M

Critical nuclides for critical station

CD 0

o)

Table III-40 EllVIRONMENTAL' RADIOLOGICAL mot 41TORING PROGRAtt

SUMMARY

CHYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTIhv PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATHWAY I

TYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS l HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

* * * * *

x * * * * * * *

m *

m a x -e *

e * *

n s u * * * * * *

a * *

z * * * *

x * * * *

u * * * *

m x * * * * * * * * *

u *

m a 4 4

e -s 4 * * *

s *

x * * = * * * *

n *

u mil K (PCI/L)

SR 89/90 5

INGESTION u ANALYSIB 24 m n

O UR-09 7*

27(

3/

12)mC47

27(

3/

12)*

27(

3/

12)*

(

16-48)*

(

16-48)*

(

16-48)*

x SR-90 1

3(

8/

12)mC47

3(

8/

12)*

3(

8/

12)*

(

1-6)*

(

1-6)*

(

1-6)*

l i

a

-. ~ - _ _ -.

INGESTION ANIMAL PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze small terres-trial animals. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table 111-41.

Samples for the first half of 1981 could not be obtained.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A compar$ son with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-42.

The operational concentrations for 1981 are consistent with preoperational and previous operational years' concentrations.

l l

t t

O 4

t O

t 60

O ty 9

O l

(J u

Table 111-41 Et4VIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL HIVER Ur1IT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS Cour1TY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATilWAY l

TYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIOt4S I HIGHEST 11EAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR sc44ma*mansum***s**sudu**eunna****m**m**anas**meazwwensa****** zen **s****auumme44*=a****iu***zeenavnea4*

Ar11MAlti x

x a

(PCI/L) m OAMMA Il4GESTION n ANALYSIS 2m n

O a

u n

n f(A-226 IH u 29(

1/

1)mC45

29(

1/

1)n SEE COLUltri 4 n

n u

TH-232 m

14

21(

1/

1)*C45

21(

1/

1)*

SEE COLUMN 4 n

n t

I-131 W

Qn ND n

n UA-140 20 m ND n

n n

n f(U-106

/1 4 ND m

a e

n n

~

n n

n u

CS-137 B n 38(

1/

1)nC45

38(

1/

1)*

SEE COLUMN 4 n

ZR-93 n

14 n ND 2

s a

n u

a u

u NN-Si n

Un ND a

n i

M u

ZN-6b

?O

ND n

n d

n K-40 a? n 252O(

1/

1)*C4S

2520(

1/

1)*

SEE COLUMN 4 s

E

Table III-42 INGESTION ANIMALS PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Single Value 720 29.0 Ra-226 Th-232 21.0 I-131

<10 100

<2.0 8a-140

<10

<7.0 Ru-106

<17.8 Cs-137

<10 80 38.0 Zr-95

<10 70

<3.5 Mn-54

<80

<2.0 O

Zn-85

<160 160

<5.0 K-40 1656.5 3586.6 2520 l

l f

l l

4 i

O l

62 l

. ~.

,, - - - - -. _ _ _ ~, _.. -... _ -.

FOOD CHAIN (GRASSES) PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze grass samples.

There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table I11-43.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no criti-ul stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-44.

The 1981 operational concentrations are similar to previous operational and preoperational concentrations except for Th-232 and Cs-137.

Cs-137 is still elevated due to residual Chinese weapons test fallout; Th-232 is naturally occurring and it's concentration is consistent with preoperational data.

l O

2 I

O 63 i

~...----

On

( )9

)

~

G Table III-43 Et4VIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA Rr'3ORTING PER IOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATHUAY I

TYPE & NO.

I LLD i

ALL LOCATIONS l HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR nocaoumu*me**s** mens **m*****una******a***********u*****u****xe*****u****aun***4*4=w****zza**zeemau***4*

GRAGS (PCI/L)

K GAMMA n

FOOD CilAIll

ANALYSla 6 *

O n

n m

((A-226 16 n 60(

6/

6)*C40

BB(

2/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 n

(27-129)*

(46-129)*

n e

TH-232 14 m 222(

6/

6)*C40

555(

2/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 n

(

26-1070)n

(

40- 1070)*

n u

n a

I-131 O

ND 1

II A-140 29 m ND

=

u a

u f(U-106 62 m 80(

2/

6)mC05

87(

1/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 u

(

72-87)*

n n

CS-137 O u 621(

6/

6)*C40

1409(

2/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4

(

18-2210)*

(

607-2210)*

u E

N E

M ZR-95 12

168(

9/

6)*CO5

229(

1/

2)x SEE COLUMN 4 n

(19-252)n n

n n

n E

NN-b4 7 m 8(

1/

G)*C40

O(

1/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 n

M n

2N-65 15 m ND a

d K-40 b4

2118(

6/

6)*COS

2740(

2/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4

( 1130- 2910)*

( 2570- 2910)*

J Table III-44

{}

FOOD CHAIN (GRASSES) PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 2363 41.0 59.8 140.5 Th-232 120 38.0 222.2 1039.8 I-131

<10

<2.3

<2.0

<2.8 a

Ba-140 26 253

<7.9

<7.2

<10.7 Ru-106

<17.0

<36.2

<102.8 Cs-137 1363 5416 333.0 621.2 2281.7 Zr-95

<10 31

<94.5

<112.5

<343.1 Mn-54

<1.9

<2.8

<7.8

()

Zn-65 589

<3.8

<5.2 X-40 578.2 2430.2 2105.0 2118.3 3313.9 s

O 65

INGESTION FOOD CR0PS (CITRUS) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze citrus samples.

There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Annual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the annual samples is in Table 111-45.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-46.

The 1981 operational concentrations were nondetectable as were previous operational and the preoperational concentrations.

O O

66

O G

10 Table lii-45 Et4VIRONMEr4TAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

4 d

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATHWAY I

TYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAT 1 LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATIOt4 INRR I a n n * * *

u *

m * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

m a * * * *

m e e n *

4

a u * * * *

m u m m * *

m * * *

a z * * * * * * * *

z u * = *

a s *

s * * *

e * *

n w e * * * * * -a * * *

c CITRUS (PCI/MG)

OAMMA m

INGESTIO!4

ANALYSIS 1

w 3

m n

I-131 4

24*

ND n

n u

UA-140 24*

ND e

4 E

u CO-Da 24*

ND n

E n

x CS-137 24*

ND u

u s

l E

CS-134 24n ND m

n u

a e

n n

u u

(1N-54 m

als ND n

n n

E ZN-65 42*

ND n

K-M n

CO-60 R42 ND 4

t l

a t

Table III-46

{)

INGESTION FOOD CR0PS (CITRUS) PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values _

Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile I-131

<10

<6.0 Ba-140

<10

<6.0 Co-58

<10

<6.0 Cs-137

<10

<6.0 Cs-134

<10

<6.0 Mn-54

<10

<5.3 Zn-65

<10.5 Co-60

<10

<6.0 O

O 68

INGESTION FOOD CR0PS (WATERMELON) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze watermelon samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Annual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the annual samples is in Table 111-47.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table III-48. There are no preoperational data for this pathway.

All 1981 operational analyses resulted in non-detectable activity as did all previous operational analyses.

O i

i O

69

(-)O (d'

Table Ifg_47 Et4VIROt4 met 4TAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORIt40 PROGRAll

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATHWAY l

TYPE & NO.

I LLD 1

ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATIOt1 INRR o

4 o u s.t u u s * * * * *

e n a *

g a m * * *

s

x a * * * * * * * * * *

e 4

m * = < * * * * * * * * * *

m *

o *

m * * * * -a c *

s

4

a t e *

m a n n e x * *

n n -a m m e

4

m WATEl(MELON n

(PCI/MG)

GAMMA m

It4 GEST ION

AllALYSIS 1

w n

x e

I-131 e

24*

ND r,

n 4

a e

n BA-140 245 ND u

E CO-SH 24#

f4D u

a CS-137 24u ND a

n u

u u

C6-134 24n ND m

u n

MN-54 21*

ND u

E E

Zti-65 42*

ND u

CO-60 24u ND J

..- -.... = =.

i t

4 t

4 i

Table III-48 j

INGESTION F000 CROPS (WATERMELON) PATHWAY 1

STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg) i.

i Nuclide Operational Values l

Mean 95 Percentile I-131

<6.0 I

Ba-140

<6.0 1

Co-58

<6.0 l

Cs-137

<6.0 Cs-134

<6.0 1

l Mn-54

<5.3 i

Zn-65

<10.5 l

Co-60

<6.0 O

1 I

I i

i k

I i

i i

O 71 i

h p-r,-+, - - - + -,-w,,ym-,

,,,

y, w - n g -w w m - - p rw m, n

,,e,,

,, see y-w-m e 7 rw w.w,,,%-er-,, -, -w m-. e. -. 4

-e e e s eneemamannen -..-

a-..-6m,=e-wu

FOOD CHAIN (SOIL) PATHWAY The University of Florida has the responsibility to collect and analyze soil samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Gama Analysis The sumary for gamma analysis of the soil samples is in Table III-49. All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison to preoperational data is presented in Table III-50.

The 1981 operational concentrations are consistent with preoperational, 1977 anc 1978 operational concentrations.

O O

72

(jm V

V n

O U

U Table 1I149

)

t ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATHUAY l

TYPE 6 NO.

I LLD I

ALL LOCATIONS i HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR o c c a m o n e n e *

m

u n * * * * * * * *

z u u * * * *

w * * * * * *

v e *

m e a n u m * *

a n *

n w a * * * *

u s * * * * < *

a n -4

a a s * * * * * < * *

s * * * * *

e

4

u SOIL u

O 4PCI/KG)

K GAMMA FOOD CHAIN

ANALYSIS 7*

q i

l RA-226 am 368(

7/

7)*C46

702(

1/

1)*

SEE COLUMN 4

(

132-702)*

e n

n m

e TH-232 9m 119(

6/

7)*C46

367(

1/

1)*

SEE COLUMN 4

(18-367)*

s u

n I-131 4*

ND u

n e

a UA-140 14*

ND O

u a

e RU-106 aun 35(

4/

7)*C46

66(

1/

1)n SEE COLUMN 4

(

4-66)*

a n

CS-137 4m 186(

6/

7)*C46

S33(

1/

1)*

SEE COLUMN 4 l

(13-533)*

n M

ZR-93 6u 12(

4/

7)*C04

12(

1/

1)*

SEE COLUMN 4

(

12-12)*

E a

MN-S4 4m 4(

1/

7)*C26

4(

1/

1)*

SEE COLUMN 4 u

a a

N E

ZN-60 7*

ND a

K-40 34w 150(

6/

7)*C46

P 1(

1/

1)e SEE COLUMN 4

(24-211)*

. :. := : ~ - --

.-== --

=-:-

J l

Q Table 111-50 i

FOOD CHAIN (S0IL) PATHWAY 1

STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES 1

ANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 2200 353.0 368.4 843.0 j

Th-232 300 59.0 101.7 347.4 I-131

<10

<1.0

<1.1

<2.2 i

Ba-140

<10

<3.3

<3.5

<7.1 Ru-106 0

330

<10.3

<23.6

<71.8 Cs-137 270 1100 s48.0

<109.8

<558.G Q

Zr-95 40 150

<12.0

<7.5

<18.6 Mn-54

<10

<1.0

<1.4

<3.8 Zn-65

<1.8

<1.7

<3.5 K-40 713 1482 175.0 130.2 302.7 i

O 74

FOOD CHA1N (MEAT) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze meat samples.

There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Semiannual Gama Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-51.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There is no critical station in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data is presented in Table III-52. There are no preoperational data for this pathway.

All 1981 operational analyses (except Cs 137) resulted in nondetectable activity which is consistent with previous operational analyses.

Cs 137 is probably elevated as a result of 1980 weapons tests conducted by the Peoples Republic of China (please see the Food Chain (Grasses) Pathway).

O O

75

0

~

t1 6

0 Table 111-51 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAtt

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UtJIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CIT 8US COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATHWAY l

TYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS l HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION l CONTROL LOCATION INRR e a st *

n

u u n a n *

a * *

s u s x

z

z u n * *

u * * * * * * * * * * * *

a m

m a * *

w. m * *

m * * * * *

a * * *

n a u *

m

4 * * * < * *

m u z

4 * * *

m a m * *

a

MEAT u

a e

(PCI/KC)

OAMMA 1

FOOD CilAlil

ANALYSIS 2*

0 E

I-131 30

ND u

u 136-140 39

ND u

n n

CO-50 E

60 m ND 1

x u

u a

CS-147 37 m 66(

1/

2)*C50

66(

1/

2)*

SEE COLUMt1 4 u

E N

N N

u CS-134 60 m ND u

u M

N MN-54 32 u ND m

n u

u N

u ZN-65 66 u ND c

e u

n

-4 u

u CO-60 60 u ND i

l i

3 i

1 ()

Table III-52 FOOD CHAIN (MEAT) PATHWAY l

STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg) j Nuclide Operational Values Mean 95 Percentile

)

I-131

<9.5

<9.5 Ba-140

<9.8

<9.8 l

Co-58

<15.0

<15.0 I

I Cs-137

<37.6

<116.3 1

Cs-134

<15.0

<15.0 i

Mn-54

<8.0

<8.0 i

i Zn-65

<16.5

<16.5 Co-60

<15.0

<15.0 0

4 4

l

)

b j

77

}

. _. _ - -.. _ _,.. _, _ _ _ _. ~.. _.. _.. _.... _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. - _. _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. - _ _ _.. _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. - _ _ __ _ _ _ _.

I I

Q FOOD CHAIN (P0ULTRY) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze poultry samples.

There are no additional stations in this pathway.

4 Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gama analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table 111-53. All samples were collected and analyzed. There is no criti-cal station in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data is in Table III-54.

There are no preoperational data for this pathway.

The 1981 operational concentrations were nondetectable as were all previous operational concentrations.

O O

78

Tble III-53 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MOtJITORING PROGRAN

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL ltIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COut4TY.Ft.ORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATHNAY l

TYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST NEAN LOCAT oowoons**=*****uunnenan*****um****ve*****x*u*an**x**wm**********u***=*mmauwe* ION I CONTROL LOCATIOt1 INRR

- m44 4*<**x****** mas *****

POUI.TR Y u

(PCI/KC)

OANHA E

FOOD CHAIt4

ANALYSIa 2*

O u

n n

a I-131 30 m

'ND 4

s u

u a

a UA-140 39 e ND u

E CO-58 60

ND s

CS-137 37

ND u

a E

R 4

CS-134 60 m ND e

ye u

m n

e e

n NH-64 5

32

ND n

n E

E n

2N-6b 66

ND u

m m

u e

E CO-60 60

ND

1 a

i i

j l

Table III-54 O

F000 CHAIN (POULTRY) PATHWAY 1

1 STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Operational Values i

{

Mean 95 Percentile s

]

I-131

<9.5

<9.5 i

J Ba-140

<9.8

<9.8 i

Co-58

<15.0

< 15. 0 -

4 1

Cs-137

<9.3

<9.3 Cs-134

<15.0

<15.0 Mn-54

<8.0

<8.0 3

l Zn-65

<16.5

<16.5 i

Co-60

<15.0

<15.0 i

O 4

l l

i l

I s

lO

'80

F000 CHAIN (EGGS PATHWAY O

The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze egg samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table 111-55.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

There is no criti-cal sample station in this pathway.

A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data is presented in Table III-56.

There are no preoperational data for this pathway and all 1981 operational analyses resulted in nondetectable activity as did all previous operational analyses.

O O

i 81

f.

~

Table III-55 ENVIRON!! ENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NONITORING PROGRAtt

SUMMARY

CItYSTAL HIVER UrJIT U DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITilUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 P AlllWAY I

TYl'E & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS l HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I cot 4 TROL LOCATION INRR o**aanauua*****aan*s*******aa********an**n****mues**uun**e***zu**e****unaunaa**-sa4z*a****=*a*********4*

EGGS n

(PCI/KG)

OAMMA n

u FOOD CilAIN u ANALYSIS 2u

O u

n u

n I-131 30

ND n

u M

n IIA-140 3'/ n ND a

n a

n i

n n

.a u

CO-Da 60

ND n

a n

CB-137 37 m ND n

M M

co n

CS-134 60 W ND a

u e

n a

n NN-54 32

ND u

n u

u

'lN-6 b 66 m ND n

K CO-60 n

60 u ND I

i 1

4 i

I

9

)

(~}

Table III-56 FOOD CHAIN (EGGS) PATHWAY i

STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Operational Values Mean 95 Percentile i

1-131

<9.5

<9.5 Ba-140

<9.8

<9.8 l

Co-58

<15.0

<15.0 Cs-137

<9.3

<9.3 Cs-134

<15.0

<15.0 Mn-54

<8.0

<8.0 Zn-65

<16.5

<16.5 4

Co-60

<15.0

()

1 i

+

i f

i i

i

(:)

4 83

FOOD CHAIN (GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES) PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze green leafy vegetable samples.

There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semianrual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table 111-57.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

The critical station for this type of analysis (Sample Station C48) is in the east sector at 4.0 miles from the plant.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table III-58.

There are no preoperational data for this pathway.

The 1981 operational concentrations are consistent with previous operational years' concentrations.

Semiannual Sr-90 Analysis The analysis of the semiannual samples for Sr-90 is presented in Table 111-59.

All samples were collected and analyzed.

The critical station for this type of analysis is Station C-48.

The critical station showed a Sr-90 concentration of 83 pCi/kg in the first half of 1981, and was nondetectable in the second half of 1981.

The high level is believed to be residual fallout from the 1980 Chinese weapons tests.

O O

84 e

"a O

O O

Table 111-57 Et4VIROt4 MENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

l CflYBTAL RIVED UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 l

CITRUS COUNTY,Ft.0RIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/01-12/31/81 P AlliUAY I

TYPE & NO.

1 LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS I HICliEST NEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INR, neanezausaaa****u***u**xe*******zu***sta******unas***nem>***xs**=********s**u*****s4*au***x*zwe*a*****

n n

n

0. t.. VI: 0 n

n PCI/KC n GAMMA

ANALYSIS 4

n

O K-n p

n n

m n

HA-226 15

133(

4/

4)-aC47

166(

2/

2)*

166(

2/

2)*

n

(66-255)*

(77-253)*

(77-255)*

n k

n n

n Til-232 14

117(

4/

4)*C47

166(

2/

2)*

166(

2/

2)*

n a

n

(41-209)*

(

122-209)*

(

122-209)*

u n

n n

1-131 8

7 n ND n

n k

UA-140 p

26 m ND n

u n

u HU-106 n

62 u 83(

1/

4)*C47

83(

1/

2)*

83(

1/

2)*

n m

n a

p n

CS-137 n

On 142(

3/

4)*C48

201(

2/

2)*

26(

1/

2)*

n n

n

(26-222)*

(

179-222)*

n a

a I

n u

n 2R-93 12 #

44(

4/

4)mC48

45(

2/

2)u 44(

2/

2)*

n a

p

(

1S-75)*

(

15-75)*

(

18-69)*

n n

rr n

MN-54 7n ND n

n n

n 2N-6D 10 p ND n

a n

n n

K-40 93 m 3618(

4/

4)*C47

4620(

2/

2)* 4620(

2/

2)*

( 2340- 4870)n

( 4370- 4870)=

( 4370- 4870)*

6

O O

O Table 111-58 F000 CHAIN (GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES) PATllWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Operational Values Control Stations Critical Stations Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile l

Ganma Analysis Ra-226 133.0 302.0 166.0 412.7 100.0 194.2 Th-232 116.8 254.2 165.5 286.1 68.0 142.9 l-131*

<1.8

<2.4

<1.6

<2.0

<2.7 Ba-140

<6.6 (8.5

<6.0

<6.7

<7.1

<9.5 Ru-106

<32.8

<98.4

<49.1

<143.0

<16.4

<17.4 Cs-137 107.3

<322.0

<14.0

<47.3 200.5 260.0 l

Zr-95 44.3 107.3 43.5 114.2 45.0 128.2 Mn-54

<1.8

<1.8 Zn-65

<4.5

<5.2

<4.6

<5.6

<4.4

<4.8 K-40 3618 5%3 4620 5313 2615 3377 Strontium Analysis Sr-90

<31.0

<103.2 20.5 46.8

<41.5

<156.5

Critical nuclides for critical station

(

Table 111-59 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY,Ft.ORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PAlllWAY I

lYPE & NO.

I LLD l

ALL LOCATIONS l HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR wo4n**=u***4****a***nu*4***zu*****unnun+444**********nnan****anun*****anzu**m********meau**m4* nan ****4*

n u

u u

G.L.VEC n

n PCI/KG u SH-90 n

FOOD CllAIN n 6NALYSIS 4 *

O n

n n

SR-90 2*

41(

3/

4)*C48

83(

1/

2)*

SEE COLUMN 4 n

n

(

11-83)m 8

i h

a h.

3 IV. EXTERNAL RADIATION The External Radiation portion of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (Specification 3.2.3) is split between the University and the State (See Table I-1).

The University also has a TLD at Sample Station C47 and the State has additional TLDs at Sample Stations C04, C40, and C46.

The summaries for the University's data is in Table IV-1 and for the State's data in Table IV-2.

Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G are the critical stations in this pathway.

Table IV-3 presents a statistical summary of all data.

The 1981 data from all TLD stations are consistent with previous operational years' data and preoperational data.

Additionally, the critical stations and the control stations of the University also compare very well.

However, because the University and the State use different types of TLDs, it is necessary to report their results separately.

O O

88

20 T*

O Z*

y am O

Z*

MO On N4 w*

He Us NI C*

MO J*

NN Ju Q*

m*

ww H*

n Z*

M O*

Uw*

O aa N

Zv MC O*

4 m

O we N

He I N N E O w Um NI 3 O I C*

M4 m i

Ja M

O W

=

I n N Z*

w o

O.

O Wm ww m

N I*

O Z w e

m O

H*

A H W*

W c W*

O E O r*********

Z U w C*

w O c w*

b 2 Q W Z*

T Q

1 U

s H

w e

=

ma Z

Z no O

w 04 3

I H

mm o

2 Z*

m J

O ov H

1 ww NI U

W HW nM w O m CW c

U*

O H C*

J w JW O Z s

ww D <

J*

4

-c O

J*

O

< T w

% W c

> Q J w a

-mmm******

< c 1 i

H Z J >

O*

O W < H J*

l I H Z J*

l Z O D O > O C C U 4

i

- U O

M

.n Z

D C*

W c

Z*

Z H

Jo da

<w i

U ZH W5 c<

ts Ww WC M*

x<

I W:

u

-Qs***5**'5 Z

O i

w

Wa CZ L W>

3*

EN 1 23 OE O ra OW C=

0 89 1*

r

zw I

.. -. - -.. ~

O

'D D

Table IV-2 i

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50--302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/01-12/31/81 ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHE8T ME INRR

- - n**4x*****************a***

AN LOCATION I. CONTROL LOCATION l

TYPE L NO.

I LLD

- - - - ..I

2. PATHWAY

- x>****x***4

- - - - xne m ********4.

n j

l AIR SullMERSION n u

(MHEM/YR) u a

n STATE u EXTERNAL

II ADI ATION 28*

20 m

59(

28/

28)*C26

171(

4/

4)*

SEE COLUMN 4

(30-188)*

(

154-188)*

i o

I i

l I

[

4

=

. = _.

Table IV-3 O

EXTERNAL RADIATION PATHWAY QUARTERLY TLD ANALYSIS (mrem /yr)

Median Mean 95 Percentile Value Value Value Preoperational 62 77 All Stations 37.0 46.0 113.2 State 41.0 58.8 152.2 University ( All Stations) 33.0 35.7 54.6 University (Critical Stations) 36.0 36.8 57.5 i

University (Control Stations) 33.0 35.1 53.4 i

4 0

91

_ = -,_ -.-..

T.-

f-h A-se -

M b

b ll l'

i k.

f.

i.

lt t

t' I

L; i

.N 1 I, A.

i s.

b'.;s, I

g 'a.

c.'

&&,. S c. & pL

-ff-'

kyne.;

A e

E,

ML20050B391

Contents

Text

R*ucTI

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML20050B391

Text

R*ucTI

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search