ML20044C311
Text
r,
._ r
~
g.g MAY 171991 g
.>\\
This letter refers tc concerns that you provided to us on April 9,1991, alleging; (I) harassment related to your 1990 performance appraisal; (2) improper quality controls associated with'a "fitup" inspection of the steam generator air ejector radiation monitor housing; (3) inadequate training for technicians performing fire protection. surveillance and monthly function surveillance SP 2410A; (4) drawing omissions associated with modification l
package PDCE M2-90-032; and (5) " unrelated, obscene criteria" on two Millstone Unit 3 i
]
~
Regarding your claims of harassment, the Depanment of Labor (DOL) has the authority to investigate this issue. In order to protect your rights, you must file a written complaint with DOL within 30 days of the occurrence of the discrimination.
We have initiated action to.have the Northeast Utilities staff review your concerns stated in -
i
(2). (3), and (4). Attached are the issues as we intend to characterize them to the licensee.
We will inform you of their review findings. You did not pro'.ide us enough specific information to follow-up on issue (3). Please provide us with further details such as the specific procedures that were affected or when the PORC approval occurred.
Should you have any further questions, or ifI can be of funher assistance in these regards, please call me collect at (215) 337-5225.
Sincerely, Orideal Cignad By
'l l
Edward Wenzinger, Chief l
Reactor Projects Branch 4 Attachments: As stated I
i 12=3 tin in '12 m:td re.s dd2:cd l
in accctee with the Fredom of Information i
Act, exemplist.s __df_28
[
~ 9303220154 921217-50:A _.841/dk i
'f-
.PDR' FCIA
.I
.j
,;HUBBARD92-162. PDR 1
p OFFICIAL RECORD COPY bec:with enclosure R. Fuhrmeister RI-91-A-0064 W. Raymond J. Stewart i
RI:DRP RI:DRP RI:DRP
'l
.xc,-,
5//f/
- J' (P,M dIw OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
o** *' 4g
+
_ 7.,0, UNITED ST ATEs
(
[
S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION '
I
-[
REOloN I f
478 ALLENDALE ROAD -
K!NG oF PRUS$1A PENNSYLVANIA 19404 MAY 171991
~
t This letter refers to concems that you provided to us on April 9,1991, alleging; (1) t harassment related to your 1990 performance appraisal; (2) improper quality controls associated with a "fitup" inspection of the steam generator air ejector radiation monitor housing; (3) inadequate training for technicians performing Gre protection surveillan monthly function surveillance SP 2410A; (4) drawing omissions associated with mo l
package PDCE M2-90-032; and (5) " unrelated, obscene criteria" on two Millstone l
i Regarding your claims of harassment, the Depanment of Labor (DOL) has the autho investigate this issue. In order to protect your rights, you must Gle a wntten complain
- 3 DOL within 30 days of the occurrence of the disenmination.
!t We have initiated action to hase the Nonheast Utilities staff review your concerns stated in i
(2), (3), and (4). Attached are the issues as we intend to characterize them to the licensee We will inform pu of their review 6ndings. You did not provide us enough specific 3
information to follow-up on issue (5). Please provide us with further details such as the speci6c procedures that were affected or when the PORC approval occurred.
Should you hase any funher questions, or ifI can be of further assistance in these rega please call me collect at (215) 337-5225.
i r
1 ly, S>
r
/
U ward -
.i ige, C. -
i Reactor Projects Bran h
-l i
Attachments: As stated l
l
)
1 I
li.IOTC]liori ifl this ferDid VC; d2MIrd in 2::ordance with the Fre %. c; !rhrr.2iion A:t, u.cm % x: _ [ / 2 0 FO'A. 9.2 -N Z
?
r// #l
a-W.
Y h
L bec:with enclosure R. Fuhrmeister RI-91. -0064 l
W. Raymond l
J. Stewan I
L
' I i
t
+
i h
2 P
b 5
?
i 4
m.y
- --. rm s**ww.. war m
.. e==wera,
emp%-
i ENCLOSURE t
Issue 1; On March 28,1991 a QC inspector was called by Generation Construction to 7
perform a final weld inspection of a prefabricated structure for the new steam jet air ejector j
monitor. The final inspection was part of procedure GWS-006. After the inspection, the QC i
inspector questioned if a " fit-up" inspection had been completed, as required by procedure.
j The fabrication and assembly of the structure were Non-QA, thus as required by GWS-006,
[
the job supervisor performs the " fit-up" inspection. Based on indication that no " fit-up" inspection had been completed, the QC inspector initiated NCR 2-91-035. On April 1, l
Generation Construction completed the authorized work order and documented that a " fit-up" l
inspection had been completed; however, it had not been completed. This is the way non-l QA inspection and documentation are normally accomplished.
-f Please discuss the validity of the above assertions. Please discuss the need for a " fit-up" inspection and the circumstances surrounding its comp!etion, if required. Please discuss any corrective actions that you have taken or may take in response to any identified problems in
.l procedural compliance or quality controls. Please discuss if the assertions are indicative of any generic problems.
t i
i l
Issue 2; On April 8,1991, a NNECO technician (") and a contractor were assigned fire protection surveillance, IC-2439A. The NNECO technician had never been trained on the
{
surveillance procedure. On April 3,1991, another technician was performing monthly function surveillance SP-2410A for the acoustic valve monitoring system associated with the
'y pressurizer relief valves. This was the first time the technician had performed the surveillance since the last major revision and again, there had been no training on the conduct of the procedures with the incorporated revisions. In both cases, the technicians experienced i
difficulty in completing the procedures and numerous questions were raised.
Please discuss the validity of the above assenions. Please discuss employee training prior to performance of complex surveillances especially in cases involving first time assignment and performance subsequent to major revisions. Please discuss any corrective actions that you j
have taken or will take in these cases, to ensure that the surveillances are completed
)
competently and safely.
(*) The identity may be obtained from the Senior Resident Inspector.
i i
i 1
5 i
'?^
,. & W.
(o g
O f..
[
N;, @ 9[6 IMAGE EVALUATION
/ /
f f j %,,
<f
\\//o//7
%[
$[##
TEST TARGET (MT-3) t" 4 s
4, f
s v tg{;,
Y>V
/4 44 l.0 iW 2 I
t-n' w L
b6=
l L.
l,l 3
lin= =
.,1 lll 1.8 n=
i 1.25 I
l.4 1.6 I
4 150mm 4
6" l
h.
%s 4%p*/,7*x J5>
%y.
s
+A
./
j y Ag/ g,3 4 A 4x c-v g, t
.p,3;gg o/
y$e r
L Sn.
, J
+;
-,: w s ; a
Wh.
Q>
/ lo
%g>&'%@',k k
T [e$e
/,jj///
t&
IMAGE EVALUATION
/f 4,
O 4g
\\///7 ffft (q
TEST TARGET (MT-3) e e
g, Y, W
//4,%'k
~
,p x*
i 1.0 Ea M l
j;l;y liliE 1.1 em p"o L
1.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 i
4 150mm 4
6" 40llAo l
ay@4>n,#y,%
v,-
m
%f 4S x
u 4
4t, ;;r /f\\ r
//(~a wo s o
i o,
y##g g
4 E
-.a o
a
\\M&,.-sa.
.w mansM&$45
$ :s op a
/C r:V..o,
" p";p f,q/
ve, I/
Q2[% 4, IMAGE EVALUATION O///
'; } ) ?'
TEST TARGET (MT-3)
/4
/ gey v, +,p
,4g
- z i.o u
p;= 2 u
e
[:
is2.0 e
l,l lL m lWI l.8 io\\==m 1.25 Fl I.4 1.6 ill i-4 150mm 6"
%y
'*3'
<>4 //%
- A Sf
_ A.nf4Nx
- ; s y s
c v 4,,
7 1 g,g, g,
- -A4-
[. Myg'.Q[j,
'5 8,.IdY,'
g -.
e y 2,
.4 ;
,y p-i L{
Issue 3; During performance of modification package PDCE M2-90-032, drawing errors were k
' noted for radiation monitor RM-9095. The errors invohs the omission of a terminal board
' between the 120 VAC power supply and the radiation monitor solenoid valve on drawings.
25203-39092 sheet 14a,25203-31118 sheet'1, and 25203-32026 sheet'53. In addition to not
- identifying the drawing errors, the modification package did not identify the need for an equipment tagout.-
[-
L Please discuss the validity of the above assertions. Please discuss actions that have been I
taken to correct any deficiencies with the modification package and with work control.
deficiencies, in general.
i t
I.
I:
g r
i q."
f i..
s
,I I '
'~
.+g
.A