ML20040A004

Forwards Draft of Proposed License Conditions Re IAEA Safeguards Implementation at Facility.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)

ML20040A004
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	01/12/1982
From:	Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Mattimoe J SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
References
TAC-43460, NUDOCS 8201200154
Download: ML20040A004 (1)

Text

3ANUNY 1 2 1982

.DISTRIBbI0ilWITHOUTENCLOSUR EXCEPT AS NOTED W/*:

~

NSIC ACRS-10 (1*)

~

Docket File

• ORB #4 Rdg Gray File NRC PDR DEisenhut H0rrstein L PDR RIngram EBlackwood

, f 'h X TERA MPadovan(1")

JG Asos (19 qp Docket No. 50-312 IE-3(l*)

El ~

C p

JAN191932o !!j Mr. J. J. Mattinoe

- NPF 3~1

'~

Assistant General Manager and

i; '

h Chief Engineer b

• [6 Sacramento Municipal Utility District g

6201 S Street P. O. Box 15830 Sacramento, California 95813

SUBJECT:

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA) SAEEGUARDS IMPLE-ENTATION AT RANCHO SECO As you are awam, the U. S. is committed by Treaty to permit the IAEA to apply safeguards in the U. S. in the sane manner as in non-nuclear weapon countries.

10 CFR 75.8 specifies that a Facility Attachment (FA) will be developed, and the FA will be implemented at the nuclear facility thmugh a license condition. The following presents the status of the above subject for Rancho Seco at this tine.

The FA, pmviously developed for Rancho Seco, is not yet finalized. A copy of the latest U. S. appmved version is enclosed, but additional minor changes might be made by the IAEA. We don't know what the changes will be, but we will not issue a license condition to implement the FA until it is finalized and discussed with you.

Regarding the license condition, we sent you an August 10, 1981 letter that contained 6 " draft stanmary evaluation" for your~ comment. The draft sumary evaluation was our first attempt to define appropriate license conditions. We reviewed your coments to our sumary evalua;1on, and our reply to your comments was hand delivered to Mr. Columbo when Mr. Padovan visited the plant site on November 4,1981. Mr. Coltzbo later told us that SMUD had no additional comments.

Having considered your coments, a draft of pmposed license conditions j

has been developed by us, and a copy is enclosed for your review and p'fOF coment. We are looking fon<ard to having your input on this atter.

and we appreciate your cooperation in applying IAEA safeguards at the S

j Rancho Seco facility.

J

Siqcemly,

/ [

a..~..

- a n Y

oljgfjg Do PDR John F. Stolz, Chief

,i pg@

upt:ra 6 my nt:at w o o ranu ornce>

..Di.vistan..of. Licensing.... 0.RW4.:.P.L........C.. _ B.thDL.

MPadovan

............ /. c bJSt

+

su= - e>...tnciosun :....................

,1,g,,,

om >.....Dra f t FA.

.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,5,e,,e, n,,,e.

ifjy82,,,,

'02 cc w/o enclosure:

xt pg.

hac ronu os now Nacu cao

v...s AL RECORD COPY usom. ion-m,*