ML20039B626
| ML20039B626 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 12/03/1981 |
| From: | Brownlee V, Rogers R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20039B616 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-321-81-31, 50-366-81-31, NUDOCS 8112230319 | |
| Download: ML20039B626 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000321/1981031
Text
"
'
.p reioq
't
UNITED STATES
h,
v
!
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
o
g
c
REGION II
o,,
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SulTE 3100
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
o
, , , * * * * *
i
Report Hos. 50-321/81-31 or.d 50-366/81-31
Licensee: Georgia Power Company
270 Peachtree Street
Atlanta, GA 30303
!
Facility Name:
Hatch 1 and 2
)
Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366
1
.
Inspection at Hatch site near Baxley, Georgia
Inspector: [ wNthe
/4/?/r/
Re F. Rogers
(/;/
/
v
Date Signed
/z./5///
Approved by:
C_
h
V'. L. Brownlee, Se/cgion Chief, Division of
Date Signed
Resident and Reactor Project Inspection
SUtti;ARY
Inspection on October 21 - November 20, 1981
Areas Inspected
This inspection involved 110 inspector-hours on site in the areas of Technical
Specification compliance, housekeeping, operator performance, overall plant
operations, quality assurance practices, station and corporate management
practicas, corrective and preventive maintenance activities, site security
'
procedures, radiation control activities, surveillance activities, IE Bulletins
and Circulars, and Tf11 Task Action items.
Resul ts
Of the 12 areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
Ohd9fjfggy
o
--
_ -
-
.
-
.
.
1
.,
.
2
i
DETAILS
i
j
1.
Persons Contacted
Licensee Employees
!
l
- M. fianry, Plant fianager
!
- T. Greene, Assistant Plant flanager
~
- C. T. Jones, Assistant Plant fianager
,-
S. Baxley, Superintendent of Operations
R. Nix, Superintendent of flaintenance
- C, Coggins,. Superintendent of Engineering Services
W. Rogers, Health Physicist
- C. Belflower, QA Site Supervisor
!
Other licensee enployees contacted included technicians, operators,
i
mechanics, security force members, and office personnel.
'
- Attended exit interview
i
2.
Exit Interview
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on November S and 20,
,
1981, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
4
3.
Licensee . Action on Previous Inspection Findings
Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items
1
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Plant Operations Review (Units 1 and 2)
!
The inspector periodically during the inspection interval reviewed shift
!
logs and operations records, including data sheets, instrument traces, and
records of equipment malfunctions. This review included control room logs
'
and auxiliary logs, operating orders, standing orders, jumper logs and
equipment tagout records. The inspector routinely observed operator
alertness and demeanor during plant tours.
During normal events, operator
performance and response actions were observed and evaluated. The inspector
l
conducted random off-hours inspections during the reporting interval to
assure that operations and security remained at an acceptable level.
Shift
'
-
'
l
turnovers were observed to verify that they were conducted in accordance
l
with approved licensee procedures.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
l
.
- - , _ .
-
.
.
.
.
- - -
- .
. . -
-
. .
..
.
_
..
.,
2
6.
Plant Tours (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector conducted plant tours periodically during the inspection
i
interval to verify that monitoring equipment was recording as required,
l
equipment was properly tagged, operations personnel were aware of plant
conditions, and plant housekeeping efforts were adequate.
The inspector
also determined that appropriate radiation controls were properly
l
established, critical-clean areas were being controlled in accordance with
procedures, excess equipment or material is stored properly and combustible
material and debris were disposed of expeditiously.
During tours the
inspector looked for the existence of unusual fluid leaks, piping vibra-
tions, pipe hanger and seismic restraint settings, various valve and breaker
,
positions, equipment caution and dar.ger tags, component positions, adequacy
of fire fighting equipment, and instrument calibration dates.
Some tours
were conducted on backshifts,
j
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
7.
Technical Specification Compliance (Units 1 and 2)
During this reporting interval, the inspector verified compliance with
selected limiting conditions for operations (LCO's) and results of selected
'
surveillance tests. These verifications were accomplished by direct
observation of monitoring instrumentation, valve positions, switch
positions, and review of completed logs and records.
The licensee's
compliance with selected LC0 action statements were reviewed on selected
a.
occurrence as they happened,
)
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
i
8.
Physical Protection (Units 1 and 2)
i
The inspector verified by observation and interviews during the reporting
'
interval that measures taken to assure the physical protection of the
facility met current requirements. Areas inspected included the organi-
<
zation of the security force, the establishment and maintenance of gates,
door and isolation zones in the proper condition, that access control and
badging was proper, and procedures were followed.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
.
9.
NRC Task Action Plant Requirements Review (NUREG 0737) (Units 1 and 2)
,
The inspector has reviewed the licensee implementation of various require-
ments associated with the NRC Task Action Plant (TAP) in response to the
'
!
Three title Island accident. The current status is summarized below.
Item
numbers refer to TAP line items.
i
- - .
.
-
.
-
. .
..
.---
-
.
- ..
.
.
- .
.
3
4
i
Item No.
Description
Completed
'
j
Action Date
!
II.D.1.2.b
Licensee
1/1/82
Yes
Submittal
,
II.K.3.30.a
Licensee
11/15/80
Yes
i
Submittal
10. Followup on IE Bulletins nd Circulars (Units 1 and 2)
i
For the following IE Bulletirs and Circulars, the inspector verified that
the response, if required, xns timely, included the required information,
,
contained adequate commitmnts and that corrective action as described in
{
the written responses was completed or scheduled for completion.
For
circulars, the inspector verified that the circular was received, reviewed,
and appropriate cor rective action taken or planned.
These Bulletins and
j
Circulars are addressed as they are issued and summarized below for record
,
a
purposes,
i
j
3.
IE Bulletins
!
}.
IEB 79-13 (Closed) Cracking in Feedwater Systeia Piping
!
IEB 79-17 (Closed) Pipe Cracks in Stagnant Barated Water Systems
'
IEB 79-21 (Closed) Temperature Effects on Level Measurements
i
IEB 80-04 (Closed) Analysis of a PWR Main Steam Line Break with
Continued Feedwater Addition
!
,
l
IEB 80-12 (Closed) Decay Heat Removal System Operability
IEB 80-17 (Closed) Fuel Pin Damage Due to Water det from Baffle Plate
i
Corner
b.
IE Circulars
i
IEC 79-08 Attempted Extortion Low Enriched Uranium
IEC 79-22 Stroke Times for Power Operated Relief Valves
i
i
<
. , . - - ,
- , _ _
e
-
.m
. -, .
, , .
.~,.--s
..--.
__
x
, _
_,__-._,,,-,...y-
, _
. - . _
. - , _ - .