Text

Annual Environ Operating Rept,Vol 2,Radiological,Jan-Dec 1980,Suppl 1.
	ML20039B120
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	12/31/1981
From:	Baynard P; FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20039B105	List: ML20039B104; ML20039B113; ML20039B120;
References
	NUDOCS 8112220310
	Download: ML20039B120 (97)
	v • d • e

_. _ .~_ ... . . . __ .. ..

e - . . .

i b

ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT I VOLUME 2.- RADIOLOGICAL L

4 J 1/1/80 - 12/31/80 SUPPLEMENT 1 f-

' CRYSTAL RIVER - UNIT 3 FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION

,1 l FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-72 1

DOCKET N0. 50-302 December, 1981 i

!O j

f 4

i l APPROVED BY: Manager -

t Nuclear Sup ort Services M ud DATE:

!- (

i i

i.

8112220310 811209"1 PDR ADOCK 05000302 R PDR.

i -- . . . . .

. _ - - - . . _ _ . . . . - . _ , , _ _ _ , . . _ _ . - . . . _ _ . . , _ _ . . _ . . . . . . . . . . _ , . _ _ _ . . . , . _ ~

.--- ._.- . - - =.=.=a e ..u..w_._.,---- .

. =. . = . - --

TABLE OF CONTENTS O PAGE I Introduction 1 II Milk and Green Leafy Vegetables Census 4 III Media Other than External Radiation 5.

IV External Radiation 88

?

i i

1 O :

i l

l I

l i

l l

l i

l i I

lO I

l i

j 1

4 w gi me n.ss-. . . , ._ - , ,. . -,. .a. . . c .-.-we,. --, _.s,

. - . - _ . . . _ . . = _ _ . _ _ _ _ _.. . . _ . . _ _ - . - _ _ _ _ _

= - . - - .. .-. - . -

LIST OF TABLES PAGE I-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 2 III-1 Air Inhalation Pathway - Gross Beta Analyses Sumary 7 III-2 Air Inhalation Pathway - I-131 Analyses Sumary 8 III-3 Air Inhalation Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 9 III-4 Air Inhalation Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 10 III-5 Air Inhalation Pathway - Sr-89 and 90 Analyses Summary 11 III-6 Precipitation Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 13 III-7 Precipitation Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 14 III-8 Precipitation Pathway - Tritium Analyses Sumary 15 III-9 Sea Water Pathway - Gama Analyses Summary 17 III-10 Sea Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 18 O III-11 Sea Water eathwey - Tritium Anaisses Summery 19 III-12 Sea Water Pathway - Sr-89 and 90 Analyses Sumary 20 III-13 River Water Pathway - Gamma Analyses Sumary 22 III-14 River Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 23 III-15 River Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Sumary 24 III-16 Ground Water Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 26 III-17 Ground Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 27 III-18 Ground Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Sumary 28 III-19 Potable Water Pathway - Gamma Analyses Sumary 30 III-20 Potable Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 31 III-21 Potable Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Sumary 32 O

11

_ . _ _ _ ~ _ . _ . _ _ _ -

q LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

J PAGE 111-22 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 34 111-23 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 35 III-24 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway - Sr-90 Analyses Sumary 36 III-25 Sea Food Chain Pathway - Gamma Analyses Sumary 38 III-26 Marine Plant Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 39 III-27 Marine Plant Pathway - Sr-89 and 90 Analyses Sumary 40 111-28 Ingestion Crab Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 42 III-29 Ingestion Crab Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 43 III-30 Ingestion Carnivorous Fish Pathway - Gamma Analyses Sumary 45 O III-31 In2estion Carnivorous Fisn eethway - Statisticai Evaluation of Analyses 46 III-32 Ingestion Herbivorous Fish Pathway - Gama Analyses Summary 48 111-33 Ingestion Herbivorous Fish Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 49 III-34 Ingestion Oysters Pathway - Gamma Analyses Fummary 51 III-35 Ingestion Oysters Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 52 III-36 Ingestion Shrimp Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 54 III-37 Ingestion Shrimp Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 55 III-38 Ingestion Milk Pathway - Gamma Analyses Sumary 57 III-39 Ingestion Milk Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 58 III-40 Ingestion Milk Pathway - Sr-89 and 90 Analyses Sumary 59 iii

- . , = . = . . - - . - . . . . . . ._ _ . .- , . . .

LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

PAGE III-41 Ingestion Animals Pathway - Gama Analyses Sutmary 61 III-42 Ingestion Animals Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 62 III-43 Food Chain (Grasses) Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 64 III-44 Food Chain (Grasses) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation

' of Analyses 65 III-45 Ingestion Food Crops (Citrus) Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 67 III-46 Ingestion Food Crops (Citrus) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation Analyses 68 III-47 Ingestion Food Crops (Watermelon) Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 70 III-48 Ingestion Food Crops (Watermelon) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation Analyses 71 III-49 Food Chain (Soil) Pathway - Gama Analysis Sumary 73 III-50 Food Chain (Soil) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 74 III-51 Food Chain (Meat) Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 76 III-52 Food Chain (Meat) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 77 111-53 Food Chain (Poultry) Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 79 III-54 Food Chain (Poultry) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of 80 Analyses III-55 Food Chain (Eggs) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 82

! III-56 Food Chain (Eggs) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 83 III-D Food Chain (Green Leafy Vegetables) Pathway - Gama Analyses Sumary 85 O

iv

..4._. __.

--: _=. . : -.: . - - - --.--- . . . ~- - - - . ._

t LIST OF TABLES (Continued) .

PAGE III-58 Food Chain (Green Leafy Vegetables) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 86 111-59 Food Chain (Green Leafy Vegetables) Pathway - Sr-90 Analyses Sumary 87 IV-1 Air Submersion Pathway - TLD Analyses Sumary (University i of Florida) 89 IV-2 Air Submersion Pathway - TLD Analyses Summary (State of Florida) 90 i IV-3 Air Submersion Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 91 O

e I

4 1

O V

i

* ~

eg. +4a, e e --4er- w w . ,

,u

...-..,-,,==em**w.. . _ . . . - . . ~ . , ,

q I. INTRODUCTION V

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program provides information which can be used to assist in assessing the type and quantity of radiation exposure in unrestricted areas resulting from plant operation. The Program is conducted via a contract with the University of Florida, Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Gainesville, Florida and a grant to the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Orlando, Florida. The parts of the Program for which each are responsible are listed in Table I-1. In essence, the Program provides a continuation of the preoperation program so that any increases of radioactivity in the environment can be detected. No pathway has shown any confirmed increases of radioactivity in the environment due to plant operation during this report period.

In the sumary analysis tables, two terms are used which need explanation.

The term "ND" means that the activity of the nuclide for the samples was non-detectable or less than half of the LLDs for those samples. The term

"<LLD" means that the activity of the nuclide for the samples was less than the LLDs for those samples. In this way, an apparent change in activity below the lower limits of detection can be trended without getting bogged down in " actual" activity values.

The statistical evaluation of operational analyses were performed using one-fourth the LLD value if the activity was non-detectable and using three-fourths the LLD value if the activity was less than the LLD value.

When a non-detectable or less than LLD concentration is used in an evalua-( tion, the results are prefaced with a "<" sign to show that the results do not indicate only detected activity.

Finally, the statistical evaluation of the operational concentrations where there are preoperational results includes the median values. This is done solely for comparison to preoperational results.

l l

O 1

- - . ,n- , - . .-,e - - , n. .- - - - . , , , . . . . n - - - - , .-

Table I-l Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RESPONSIBILITY PATHWAY SAMPLESTATI0t{S(l)

University Air Submersion C04, C14H*, C14M*, Cl4G*,

C40, C41, C43, C46 State Air Submersion C07, C09, C18, C26 University Air Inhalation C41*

State Air Inhalation C04, C07, C18, C26, C40, C46 State Precipitation C04, C26, C40 University Sea Water C01, C09, Cl3, C14H, C14M, C14G*

State River Water C15 State Ground Water C40 University Potable Water C07, C10, C18 University Shoreline External C01, C09, C14H*, C14M*,

i Sediment C14G*

University Seafood Chain C29, C30 University Ingestion Crab C29*, C30 University Ingestion Fish C29*, C30 (Carnivorous)

University Ingestion Fish C29*, C30 (Herbivorous)

University Ingestion Oysters C29, C30 University Ingestion Shrimp C27 University Ingestion Milk C47, C49*

University Ingestion Animals C45 University Food Chain (Grasses) COS, C40, C41

. O 4

O V

Table I-1 (Continued)

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RESPONSIBILITY PATHWAY SAMPLE STATIONS (l)

State Ingestion Food C19 Crops (Citrus)

State Ingestion Food C04 Crops (Watermelon)

University Food Chain (Soil) C04, C07, C18, C26, C40, C41, C46 State Meat C50 State Poul try C51 State Eggs C51 University Food Chain C47, C48*

(Yegetables)

O i'

,

Critical Pathway Sample Stations l (1) See ETS Table 3.2-4 and Figures 3.2-2 and 3.2-3 for the description and location of all Sample Stations.

O 8

3

___,7

..- ,,. -..- ,_,,,,_- - - . ,,--., -,_m, . , _ _ . . . . . .~,..m_.._, _ _ . _ _ _ , _ . . . . . . . _ , - __ _ _ _ _ . . , _

- -._ - - -.... . . .-:,--.. _. _ - - = . - :. ._ ...

II. MILK AND GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLE CENSUS Environmental Technical Specification 3.2.1 requires a census of animals producing milk for human consumption to be conducted semiannually. If this census fails to locate any such animals, a census of gardens producing j fresh leafy vegetables for human consumption is required annually.

The garden census, required as tie result of a lack of findings on the milk animal census, was completed ,n April 7 and 8,1980. The critical garden (Sample Station C48) found tu be in the east sector a*. 4.0 miles from the plant.

A semiannual milk cow survey was completed on July 31, 1980 again with no milk animals found. The critical station for green leafy vegetables was continued at the garden 4.0 miles from the plant in the east sector.

A seminannual milk cow census was completed by December 22, 1980. No milk animals were located within five miles of the plant site in this survey.

i O

1 o

LJ 4

O 11t- stot^ otsta tw^w extrawa' a^otattow AIR INHALATION PATHWAY The Air Inhalation Pathway is one of two pathways split between the Univer-sity and the State. In addition to the assigned stations, the University operates a station at C47.

Weekly Gross Beta Analysis The summary for the gross beta analysis is in Table III-1. Three weekly samples were not collected and analyzed:

C07 for the week of April 21, 1980 due to missing particulate fil ter.

C41 for the week of May 2,1980 due to failure to make required collection.

C47 for the week of March 7,1980 due to personnel error that resulted in discarding the particulate filter.

All other samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations for this type of analysis. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational O data is preseated ta rabie 111 The operational concentrations are similar to the preoperational concentra-tions and consistent with the 1979 operational concentrations.

Weekly I-131 Analysis The summary for the iodine analysis is in Table III-2. One weekly sample was not collected and analyzed:

C41 for the week of January 4,1980 due to personnel error that resulted in discarding the charcoal cartridge.

All other samples were collected and analyzed. Station C41 is the critical station for this type of analysis and no samples had activity greater than 10 times the control station's 95 percentile values. A statistical evalua-tion of the operational data is presented in Table III-4. There are no preoperational data.

The statistical analysis of the critical and control stations for the period of this report is presented in Table III-4.

O 5

" ~ ~ ~'

_ _z_1.- _. .:__ _ .. . . _ _ . _ _ _ . . ..

Quarterly Gamma Analysis The summary for gama analysis of quarterly composites is in Table III-3.

All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations for this type of analysis. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-4.

The concentrations of nuclides by gama analysis during 1980 were generally less than the preoperational concentrations and consistent with the 1979 concentrations.

Quarterly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The summary for the stron tium analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-5. All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no criti-cal stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational-data is presented in Table III-4.

1 There are no preoperational data and all operational concentrations are consistent.

l O

1 i

O 6

l

. . . _ _ . ~ _ _ _ _ . . _

. _ _ . . _ . _ _ . . , . _ _ _ - . _ _ _ , _ . . . . _ _ , , _ . _ . _ . . . _ . , _ , . . . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . . _ _ . . . _ _ _ . _ . . ~ . . _ . . - - , _ _ _ _ _ , . _ _ , , _ . . . . . . , _ . -

p Table III-1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLOilIDA REPORTI. i PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/90 PATHUAY l TYPE !< NO. LLD I ALL LOCATIONS I HICHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRJ

nec>n******s,*,r*nx**************.c************************** nun ***********************************m****

u * * * * *

AIR IrlHALATION * * * * * * *

( P C I / t-13 )

CROSS D 416 *0.008 *0.030( 378/ 409)*C26 *0.036( 46/ ! 52 )

SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * (0.004-0.261)* * (0.011-0.126)* *-

n * * * * *

i I

N t

i i

i !

i f

O-

~

O O v V y Table III-2 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO 'S0-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/00-12/31/00 PATHWAY ! TYPE 2: NO. I LLD I ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION i CONTROL LOCATION INRR-9kns*****************************r,****n*************a**********************Wo**************************

44 * * * * * *.

AIR IrlHALATION * * .* * * *

i (PCI/M3)

Iodine- 131 416 *O. 039 *0.062( 2/ 411)*C47 *0.081( 1/ 1)* 'SEE COLUMN 4 *

x * * (0.043-0.081)* * (0.081-0.081)*

i e

i h

a 9

y -- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ . .

ZO

-*C000000 GCC COC CCCCOOCC*CO* CCC COQOCOQQQ C O

20 00

~*

U*

O*

J*

O*

c*

He Z*

O*

U*

O ~******** *** *** ************ *** *********

C3 * ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~

N Z* v v v v v vO y w a g. O N m N m N C O "" m oe o o N -

O

< N >* o. o o. o. o. ,

Z N N <* o o o o Z O - U* N.4,I N I N8 N. 8 N. a N, t 3, m e c* c vm mN vM c4 to v g* g o y, o o o o N d m

O O

o. o. o. o. o.

Z O N Z* o. o o o o o q w <g o ww w w ww ww ww g O U 1e ww to m N O O- . N Z* C En D

o N

o o

N b O 4 # *.. o.

c 0 H* o. o. o. o. o. g C. H LO

o o o o o i WQ W*

O -c O Z******** *** *** ************ *** *********

Z U

C*

- O c ~*- n H A M M c C W Im v v v v v a.c O C.

O U U U U U H

m o

~~ ~~ nn n n ~~ ~~ nn Z Z v N Cr NO NO N N CJ N NO N '

O -

On ON 00 O O 00 00 c" O I H U)

O O O O O .N,', ,

e c Zu .

o' b .J O Oy 0 0. 0. 0. 0.

" <J c. ~* Ni NI NI N N NI NI NI

- U W Hu WS C:N IN - N N CD - NC (D O

- O c <* O O O O * - O - Q Q -

ca 0 U* O O O Z O O Z Z O m O H On . . . . . .

H JO Z - J*

vw O

ww O

O

w ww O

ww O

w O

- D < J* r>- 4 N 2 C - O t%

C C Jo N O O J J O O M

< c - <t O O O J J O e C.

c. W c ir . . V V .

o,

> O n O O O. ') O.

J

J -*****.a***************************************

< c u.,

O - 0 0 CD C2 C1 CD CD 4 0 H . c 0 07 - O O O O O O - C3 Z J > O* O O O O O O O O O O O W < H J et . . .

Z - Z JA O O. O. O. O. O O. O O. O. O.

Z C:: O

O > O --v********************************************

c C: O 03

- U - - C-J

> L1 .4 01 0 2 D C* >

e c Ze J t 4 N - O 4 .N H v <>W e D1 O O v o O O r O O

- 65

ZJH - CJ G -4 - - - & O 4 7

<c- I ! i i i i i 1 l- i i W* W 0i W ' T - < D U1 c Z Z li' c_ * <-O U c H C3 % U N Z N

>$ ZC2 5-

Z<Z

<DC

OCG

.- * * *

n ;: ***2***********aa*********=*****u******

6

Z e O

'?** * -- a

$O Cv JZ 77 < N.

I' Z~

k~ '- Zu O. ? v

.- e 9 n -

a .-

. ~ . -- . . . . . - . . . . .

- ~ _ . - _ - . . ._ - - .

i O O O

! Table III-4

]' AIR INHALATION PATHWAY f STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pC1/m3 )

l!l Nuclide Preoperational Values _

Operational Values Control Station. Critical Stations j Iodine Analysis Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile

! I-131 -- --

<.010 <.010 .021 <.010 <.020 .010 .027 l t

Gross Beta Analysis .029 .12 .023 <.029 <.086 <.029 <.083 .024 .103 [

i Ganma Analysis

, Ce-144 .003 .172 <.015 <.014 <.029 <.015 <.030 <.004 <.012 ii

,) Ra-226 <.2 .241 <.010 <.009 <.016 <.009 <.013 <.008 <.024 l; Th-232 <.01 .008 <.005 <.004 <.007 <.005 <.007 <.002 <.004 g I-131 <.07 .004 <.003 <.002 <.004 <.002 <.004 <.0001 <.0003 Ba-140 <.01 .016 <.005 <.004 <.010 <.004 <.010 <.0004 <.001 l

j Ru-106 .025 .216 <.0125 <.019 <.049 <.022 <.050 <.001 <.002 i

j' Cs-137 <.01 .013 <.003 <.002 <.003 <.002 <.003 <.001 <.002 ji Zr-95 .003 .043 <.003 <.013 <.116 <.005 <.011 <.019 <.092 4.t i! Mn-54 <.01 <.01 <.003 <.002 <.004 <.002 <.004 <.001 <.003 I

j+ Zn-65 <.01 <.01 <.005 <.004 <.008 <.004 <.008 < 002 <.006 l K-40 <16.8 <16.8 <.028 <.030 <.092 <.026 <.036 <.06 <.243 Strontium Analysis

, Sr-89 -- --

.0005 .0006 .002 <.0005 <.0008 <.001 <.006 i-l Sr-90 - --

.0003 .0002 .0004 <.0002 <.0004 0 0 i

e 8 8 >

Table III-5 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY I TYPE & NO. I LLD I ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR oce*********************************************************N******************************************- '

AIR INHALATION * * * *

l (PCI/M3) MSR 89-90 * * * * *

j

ANALYSIS 32 * * * * *

l

SR-89

O.002*O.002( 3/ 32)*C41 *0.005( 1/ 4)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * (0.000-0.005)* * * *

SR-90

O.001*0.000( 1/ 32)*C41 *0.000( 1/ 4)* SEE COLUMN 4

su i

4 l

..- ~ . - , .. .

PRECIPITATION PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze precipitation samples. There are no additional stations for the pathway. No samples were available in May due to lack of sufficient precip. cation.

Monthly Gama Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the monthly samples is in Table III-6. All monthly samples were collected (except for May) and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-7.

The 1980 operational activities of the nuclides determined by gamma analysis were non detectable as were the preoperational,1977, 1978 and 1979 operational activities.

Monthly Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of the monthly precipitation sample is in Table III-8.

All samples were collected (except for May) and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evalutaion of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-7.

All of the 1980 operational activity data for tritium were less than the LLDs as were the preoperational and 1979 operational activities.

l 1

O 12

8 8 -

8 Table III-6 ENVIRO!4 MENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/00 PATHWAY I TYPE & NO. I LLD 1 ALL LOCATIONS l HIGFiEST M$EAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR o*oo******************+-******************************************I,**4**********************************

PRECIPITATION * * * ** * *

(PCI/L)

CAMMA * * ** * *

ANALYSIS 36 * * ** * *0

I-131

17

ND ** * *

BA-140

17

ND ** * *

CS-137

17

ND ** * * '

+ * * ** * *

* * * ** *

I

~

CS-134

17

ND ** *

w * * * ** * *

CO-58

17

ND ** * *

MN-54

15

ND ** * *

ZN-65

30

ND ** * *

CO-60

17

ND ** *

c I

-i j '

l l

r i

o

' ^

_..__J..____-.=__n __-_ _ _____. . ...:c_ _ m a

Table III-7 Q

PRECIPITATION PATHWAY i STATISTIJAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values

[ Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysis I-131 <.4 <.4 <4.3 <4.3 <4.3 Ba-140 <10 <10 <4.3 <4.3 <4.3 1 Cs-137 <10 <10 <4.3 <4.3 <4.3 Cs-134 <10 <10 <4.3 <4.3 <4.3 1

Co-58 <10 <10 <4.3 <4.3 <4.3 Mn-54 <10 <10 <3.8 <3.8 <3.8 Zn-65 <20 <20 <7.5 <7.5 <7.5 Co-60 <10 <10 <4.3 <4.3 <4.3 Tritium Analysis H-3 <320 <320 <150 <150 <150 f

i i

s O

l 14 i

- -... _ m ,, . . . ,.

ww,+---m-# w.e-y-- 9w -py, s.-g-ro--egW'T'8 " " "' ' **g*-'T'"*"'""'"T"P*en---gri.wy-- e-*ee-g w w-t cW - - my- t e m ev +y-yve--+ m Ny -ww w ww9 vgvTw m m eg g ew y+*g - v-w w g g- 'twwww*"w--w-**'*-'*M* 'T

3 Table III-8 8

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTINO PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80

<. PATHWAY I TYPE t< NO. I LLD l ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR oo*****************************************************************************************************

k * * * *

PRCIP * * * * * * *

(PCI/L)

TRITIUM * * * * *

i AIR

ANALYSIS 36 * * * * * *O

H-3

241 * <LLD( 34/ 34)* * *

l.

i I

t Q SEA WATER PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze sea water sam-ples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Monthly Gama Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of monthly samples is in Table III-9.

All samples were collected and analyzed. Sample Station C14G is the criti-cal station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value. A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-10.

The concentrations of nuclides by gamma analysis during 1980 were generally less than the preoperational concentrations and consistent with 1979 con-centrations. The critical stations and the control stations concentration were almost identical.

Quarterly Tritium Analysis The sumary for the tritium analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-11. All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-10.

f%

d The concentrations observed in 1980 were consistent with preoperational and 1979 operational concentrations.

Quarterly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The results of the analyses for the quarterly samples of Sr-89 and 90 are presented in Table III-12. All samples were collected and analyzed.

Sr-89/90 are not critical nuclides in this pathway. A statistical evalua-tion of operational data is presented in Table 111-10. There are no pre-operational data. The 1980 Sr-89/90 concentrations are consistent with those of previous operational years.

O V

16

, - --. T ~::: ~ ~ - v: : ~ . := . __

l 8 S S Table III-9 l

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY I TYPE t< NO. I LLD I ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHES MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

o*****************n***********************************n********T

- - - - n********

SEA WATER * * * * * * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * * * * *

ANALYSIS 72 * * * * *

O ,

* * * * *

i

RA-226

11

31( 66/ 72)*C09

40( 12/ 12)* 33( 55/ 60)*

* * ( 5- 71)* * ( 20- 71)* ( 13- 71)* ,

TH-232

10

17( 54/ 72)*C01

17( B/ 12)* 17( 46/ 60)*

* * ( 9- 29)* * ( 13- 22)* ( 9- 29)*

I -131

5* 6( 5/ 72)*C140* 7( 2/ 12)* 6( 3/ 60)*

* * ( 6- 7)* * ( 7- 7)* ( 6- 6)*

q * * * * * * *

DA-140

18

26( 2/ 72)*C140* 34( 1/ 12)* 18( 1/ 60)*

* * ( 18- 34)* * * *

RU-106

40

47( 2/ 72)*C14M* 55( 1/ 12)* 47( 2/ 60)*

* * ( 39- 55)* * * ( 39- 55)*

CS-137

6* 5( 16/ 72)*C01

7( 3/ 12)* 5( 14/ 60)*

* * ( 3- 11)* * ( 5- 11)* ( 3- 11)* ;

ZR -95

9* 10( 1/ 72)*C14M* 10( 1/ 12)* 10( 1/ 60)* '

j

CS-134

6* 5( 8/ 72)*C14H* 7( 2/ 12)* 5( 7/ 60)*

* * ( 3- 7)* * ( 7- 7)* ( 4- 7)*

MN -54

5* 6( 1/ 72)*C14G* 6( 1/ 12)* O( O/ 60)* '

ZN -65

12

17( 1/ 72)*C14M* 17( 1/ 12)* 17( 1/ 60)* :

K - 40

53

246( 69/ 72)*C14G* 301( 12/ 12)* 235( '57/ 60)* -

* * ( 61- 502)* * ( 194- 502)* ( 61- 362)*

(%)1

? (

v i Table III-10 SEA WATER PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF #4A1.YSES (pCi/kg) >

l Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Control Stations Critical Stations -

l Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95."crcentile -Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentfle i Ganina Analysis Ra-226 --

600 <29.3 <29.0 <59.0 <30.3 <61.5 <22.5 <41.9 1

l Th-232 --

7 <15.3 <12.9 <26.4 <13.3 <26.7 <11.0 <24.9

! I-131* <.4 <.4 <1.5 <1.5 <3.6

<1.5 <3.8 <1.4 <2.3 !

j Ba-140 <10 11 <5.8 <5.1 <13.4 <4.7 <9.7 <4.7 <8.6

!! Ru-106 -- --

<10.8 <11.1 <25.9 <11.2 <26.8 <11.0 <20.1 l

5 Cs-137* <10 10 <2.0 <2.4 <6.1 <2.4 <6.3 <2.2 <5.7 i' I

3 i

+

Zr-95 <10 <10 <2.3 <2.1 <3.8 <2.1 <3.8 <2.3 <3.9 1 I i

, Cs-134* <10 <10 <2.0 <1.9 <4.4 <1.9 <4.6 <1.8 <3.1 i

j Mn-54 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.3 <2.8 <1.2 <2.2 <1.7 <4.5 Zn-65 <20 7 <2.8 <3.1 <7.0 <3.1 <7.3 <2.9 <4.9-

,4 K-40 150.8 368.7 <240.0 <241.7 <419.9 <223.9 <400.4 <300.7 <480.9 i

Strontium Analysis I !

Sr-89 -- --

<0.5 <0.5 <1.2 <0.5 <1.3 <0.5 <0.9 Sr-90 -- --

0 <0.3 <1.4 <0.4 <1.5 0.0 0.0 i!

Tritium Analysis i!

'! H-3 71 87 <290.5 <326.3 <881.72 <324.28 <899.25 <336.63 <856.62

Critical nuclides for critical station. I

9 8 Table III-11 3 '

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/00-12/31/u0

't PATHWAY I TYPE & NO. 1 LLD I ALL LOCATIONS l' HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR I

ooo***************************************e*********************p**************************************

l * *

y

1 *

SEA WATER * * * *

l *

i (PCI/KG)

TRITIUM * * * * * *

ANALYSIS 24 * * * * * *O l * * * * * * *

H-3

530

752( 4/ 24)*C14M* 977( 2/ 4)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 363- 1445)* * ( 508- 1445)*

I 5

E l

l 1,

i l

i

i t 8 8 Table III-12 8

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 i CITRUS COUNTY FLORIDA REPORTINO PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 I PATHWAY I TYPE & Nil. I 1.LD 1 ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

- - - - x*****************n**********n**n**************************n**************************kk*

4: a a * * *

SEA HALER u * * * * * *

(PCI/KG)

SR-89/90 * * * * *

a ANALYSIS 24 * * * * * *O a a * * * * *

M * * * * *

SR-90

O* 1( 9/ 24)*C09

1( 2/ 4)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( O- 2)* * ( 1- 2)* *

l 38 * * * *

a * * * * * *

GR-09

1m 1( 2/ 24)*C09

2( 1/ 4)* SEE COLUMN 4

a * * ( 1- 2)* * *

E$

i

'. l

,f i i i 1

Q RIVER WATER PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze river water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Quarterly Gama Analysis The sumary for the gama analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-13. All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-14. Neither preoperational nor operational samples have had detectable activities present within the required LLDs.

Quarterly Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-15. All samples were collected and analyzed. The LLD for tritium in Table III-15 is higher than the required LLD of 200 pCi/kg.

This is due to fourth quarter equipment problems which caused the LLD to be 400 pCi/kg. This equipment problem has been corrected. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-14. Neither preoperational nor operational samples have had detectable activities present within the required LLDs.

O O

21

_--_______.____.__________________________1___________________________MZZ1__1J.EM_

! # 8 Table III-13 8

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

j CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. SC.-302 i CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY I TYPE & NO. I LLD 1 ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR oo*o********************mn***************************************************************************** '-

RIVER NATER * * * ** *

i (PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * ** *

li

ANALYSIS 4* * ** * *O

t * * * ** *

l' * * * ** * *

!!

I-131

17

ND ** * *

t * * * ** * *

BA-140

17

ND ** *

a CO-58

17

ND ** *

m

CS-137

17

ND ** *

m * * * ** * *

CS-134

17

ND ** * *

MN-54

15

ND ** *

i * * * ** * *

ZN-65

30

ND ** * *

CO-60

17

ND ** *

z... . :- -

-- ..=.; _-- - - -- - - -

=' -

Table III-14

. RIVER WATER PATHWAY t

STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysi.

1-131 <.4 <.4 <4.3 <4.3 <4.3 i Ba-140 <10 <10 <4.3 <4.3 <4.3 Co-58 <10 <10 <4.3 <4.3 <4.3 Cs-137 <10 <10 <4.3 <4.3 <4.3 l Cs-134 <10 <10 <4.3 <4.3 <4.3 Mn-54 <10 <10 <3.8 <3.8 <3.8 Zn-65 <20 <20 <7.6 <7.5 <7.5 Co-60 <10 <10 <4.3 <4.3 <4.3 Tritium Analysis H-3 <320 <320 <150 <187.5 <334. 5

%~

23

_ .__ ~ . , _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ . . _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . .

p,qgys, e.-- ryy-.y- g-y,ye----gy.,,.,,-y y,-y w, w.,

ff e,m. ,.m-,qae 9%, 9

S S S Table III-15 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 i CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERJOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY I TYPE 84 NO. I LLD 1 ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

o*o***************n************************************************n**************************n*******

^

RIVER WATER * * * * * * *

(PCI/KC)

TRITIUM * * * * * *

ANALYSIS 4* * * * * *O

H-3

250 * <LLD( 4/ 4)* * *

i N

1 i

l

'l i

l

, i 1

4

. ... ..- :2. - . - - - . . -

Q GROUND WATER PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze ground water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiar.nual Gama Analysis The sunenary for the gamma analysis of semiannual samples is in Table III-16. All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no I critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data is presented in Table III-17. All operational samples had no detectable activity and there are no preoperational data.

Semiannual Tritium Analysis

The sumary for the tritium analysis of semiannual samples is in Table 111-18. The tritium analysis sample for the second half of 1980 was lost in a laboratory accident. There are no critical stations in this 1 pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table 111-17. All operational samples had no detectable activity and there are no preoperational data.

O

, O 25

~ ~ ~~ 2:~ ~l:T:~~; _., , --- ::: - ., .- _. L: .::,~,~: 2 L . L: ___. . _ .

1 e t t '

Table III-16 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY I TYPE t< NO. I LLD 1 ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHES MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION I NT o***************************************************************T

- - - - t

i CROUND WATER *' * * ** * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA *

5 * * *

ANALYSIS 2* * * * * *(

I *

I-131 17

ND * * , *

1 * * * * * *

1 * * * * * * *

DA-140

17

ND * * , *

l * * * ** * *

,

CO-58

17

ND * * * *

$ $ $ I $ * $

CS-137

17

ND * * *

i y * * * ** * *

* *

4 * *

CS-134

17

ND * * * *

MN-54

15

ND * * * *

ZN-65

30

ND ** * *

CD-60

17

ND ** * *

?

l .

i

O tabie ttt-t7 GROUND WATER PATHWAY i STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg) 4 Nuclide -Operational Values

' Mean 95 Percentile i Gamma Analysis I-131 <4.3 <4.3 Ba-140 <4.3 <4.3 Co-58 <4.3 <4.3 i

Cs-137 <4.3 <4.3 Cs-134 <4.3 <4.3 Mn-54 <3.8 <3.8 Zn-65 <7.5 <7.5 '

t Co-60 <4.3 <4.3 Tritiun: Analysis H-3 <150 <150 L

i 1

1 r i

t O

27

. - . . - ... - ..:: . -._-. . -. ._ . _ , ::::.2_- - . . - . ::::: -. - _ --,- -, .. . .. - - :::.. .-

e e 3 Table III-18 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/00-12/31/80 PATHWAY i TYPE & NO. ! LLD ! ALL LOCATIONS; I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INR

- - - - u************uun*************************************************

CROUND WATER * * * * * * *

(PCI/KG)

TRITIUM * * * * * *

ANALYSIS 2* * * * * *0

H-3

200 * <LLD( 1/ 1)* * *

f i

l t

. . - . u. . . . - .. . .

Q POTABLE WATER PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze potable water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway. i Quarterly Gamma Analysis The sumary for the gama analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-19.

All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a com-parison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-20. The 19PJ operational activity was generally less than the preoperational activ-ity levels and were consistent with 1979 concentrations.

Quarterly Tritium Analysis The sumary for the tritium analysis of the quarterly samples is in Table III-21. All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-20. All sample activities were less than the sample LLD.

O O

29

.-_ JT i _, . . _.-.T if,~ T i _ _ ,1. _ _ ___T'.J_ _ _.: :.._.; n ::::~f ~' _

3 O O O v v g.

Table III-19 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

5 CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 j CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REP 3RTING. PERIOD 01/01/00-12/31/80

'i~

PATHWAY I TYPE & NO. I LLD ALL LOCATIONS l dIGHEST MEAN LOCATIO 1 CONTROL LOCATION INRR t

onno*********************4************1

- - - - N *************************

POT. WATER * * * * * * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * * * *

INCESTION

ANALYSIS 12 * * * * *

* * * * *O

I -131 *

7e ND * * * *

DA-140

21

ND * * * *

CS-137

7* ND * * *

w

CS-134

7* 3( 1/ 12)*C07

3( 1/

4)* SEE COLUMN 4

o * * * * * *

CD-58

6* ND * * *

MN-54

6* ND * * * *

ZN-65

15

ND * * * *

CD-60

6* ND * * * * ,

4

() Table 111 20 POTABLE WATER PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile .

Gamma Analysis 1-131 <.4 <.4 <1.8 <1.6 <2.5 Ba-140 <10 <10 <5.9 <5.3 <9.3 Cs-137 <10 <10 <1.8 <1.7 <2.6 Cs-134 <10 <10 <1.8 <1.7 <2.6 Co-58 <10 <10 <1.5 <1.5 <2.1 Mn-54 <10 <10 <1.5 <1.6 <2.3 Zn-65 <20 <20 <3.8 <3.6 <5.7 O Co-60 <10 <10 <1.6 <1.6 <2.4 Tritium Analysis H-3 <320 <320 <195.5 <176.7 <286.2 f

O 31

Table III-21 l

I ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD O$/01/80-12/31/00 PATHWAY TYPE 24 NO. I LLD 1 ALL LOCATIONS ! HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

co***************************************************************q*p**********************************

POT. WATER * * * * *

(PCI/KG) a TRITIUM * * * * * *

ANALYSIS 12 * * * # * *O

*

y * * *

H-3

600

534( 1/ $2)*C1B

534( 1/ 4)* SEE COLUMN 4

M h

Q SHORELINE EXTERNAL SEDIMENT PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze shoreline ex-ternal sediment samples. There are no additional stations for this path-way.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gama analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-22. All samples were collected and analyzed. The critical stations for this analysis are Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-23.

The 1980 operational data show nuclide concentrations less than the pre-operational data and consistent with the 1979 operational data.

Semiannual Sr-90 Analysis The summary for the strontium analysis of the se:qit.nnual samples are in Table III-24. All samples were collected and analyzed. The critical stations are Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G and no sample had activi-ty greater than 10 times the control station value. A statistical evalua-tion of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-23.

There are no preoperational data and 1980 operational results are consis-tent with previous operational data.

O 33 7 .-

O O O :

i %. .

Table III-22 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 l'

PATHWAY l TYPE & NO. I LLD I ALL LOCATIO I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CO

- - - - NS

- - - - NTROL LOCATION INRR'

- - - - y BOT. SED. * * * * * * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * * * *

SHORELINE EXT

ANALYSIS 10 * * * * *

0

RA-226

8* 317( 10/ 10)*C14H* 765( 2/ 2)* 141( 4/ 4)*

* * ( 69- 925)*

l

( 605- 925)* ( 120- 162)* i

TH-232 *

8* 65( 8/ 10)*C14H* 130( 2/ 2)* 44( 4/ 4)*

* * ( 27- 183)* *

( 77- 183)* ( 27- 76)*

I-131

3* 5( 1/ 10)*CO2

5( 1/ 2)* 5( 1/ 4)*

w * * *

i

BA-140

9* ND * * * *

RU-106 *

17

ND * * *

j > * * * *

i 5 CS-137

i

3* 9( 5/ 10)*C14H* 15( 1/ 2)* 11( 2/ 4)*

4 * * * ( 4- 15)* * *

+5 * * * *

( 8- 14)*

2R- 95 *

=

4* ND * * *

i CS-134

3* 7( 2/ 10)*C14H* 7( 1/ 2)* ND *

* ( 7- 7)* * * !

-e *

1 * * * *

MN- 54

2* ND * * * *

ZN- 65

6*

4

+ ND * * * *

K-40

31

199( 9/ 10)*C14H* ,

*

71-439( 2/ 2)* 121( 3/ 4)* '

( 612)* * ( 265- 612)* ( 96- 164)* ;

1

O O O- ,

Table III-23 SHORELINE EXTERNAL SEDIMENT PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values i

Control Stations Critical Stations Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Pertentile Gansna Analysis f

Ra-226 2900 10,000 192.0 316.9 847.8 140.8 175.9 434.3 1024.0 Th-232 90 300 <38.0 <51.9 <155.2 44.3 87.5 <57.0 <190.3 1-131 <.4 34 <.8 <1.2 <3.9 <1.8 <6.0 <0.7 <1.7 Ba-140 <10 <10 <2.5 <2.2 <5.2 <2.6 <3.6 <2.0 <5.9 g Ru-106 190 690 <4.8 <4.3 <10.5 <4.8 <7.1 <3.9 <12.1 g Cs-137* <10 250 <2.5 <4.8 <16.0 <5.9 18.4 <4.1 <15.4 Zr-95 12 40 <1.0 <1.0 <2.1 <1.0 <1.6 <0.9 <2.4 Cs-134* <10 <10 <.9 <2.0 <7.2 <0.7 <1.2 <2.0 <6.9 Mn-54 <10 19 <.6 <0.6 <1.2 <0.6- <0.9 <0.6 <1.4 Zn-65 -- --

<1.4 <1.4 <3.0 <1.4 <1.7 <1.4 <3.6 K-40 259.8 1,006 141.0 179.8 507.9 92.7 219.8 237.8 618.9 f

3 I 1 Strontium Analysis l

Sr-90 -- --

<15.0 <13.5 <29.6 20.0 33.9 <9.2 <21.4 -

Critical nuclides for critical station !

L O -

O O V U v ja j, Table III-24 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM EUMMARY >

ll

j. CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 k i CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 f

=

4 ,

s

!i PATHWAY I TYPE & NO. I LLD I ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST HEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

- - - - i***********************

* * * * *

7 i

DOT. SED * * * * * * *

(PCI/KG)

SR-90 * * * *- * *

, SHORELINE EXT

ANALYSIS 10 * * * * *

O 1 4 * * * * * *

SR-90

15

53( 6/ 10)*C14H* 22O( 1/ 2 ) +- 25( 3/ 4)* '

* * ( 6- 220)* * * ( 23- 27)*

't I

j. $ i ;

i 1

i i, i

l - ,

k A f 1 i i i ;

I l

D i' p -

i; i l' !

P t

-, __ __ - . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . ._ ~

(] SEA FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY (MARINE PLANTS)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze marine plants in the sea food chain. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The sumary for the gama analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-25. All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-26.

The 1980 operational concentrations are less than the preoperational con-centrations and are consistent with 1979 operational data.

Semiannual Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The summary of analysis of the quarterly samples for Sr-89 is presented in Table III-27. All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data is presented in Table III-26. There are no preoperational data.

The 1980 Sr-89/90. concentrations have shown a slight increase over previous operational years' concentrations.

No apparent reason for this increase could be determined. Florida Power Corporation will continue to monitor this pathway.

37

. ~~~~T_. _

_ __ _ J. . . _ -

-_ C : : :: ~: : ~~~ r ; L .L ..._.-

O O O

- w ,.

1 Table III-25 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY l' TYPE & NO. I LLD ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATIO I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

- - - - N 1

MARINE PLANT * * * * * *

PCI/KG

GAMMA * * * * *

GEAFOOD CHAIN *. ANALYSIS 4* * * * * *0 i

RA-226

13

S1C 4/ 4)*C30

S7( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * * ( 15- 74)* * ( 40- 74)* *

* * *

i

i, 1 * * * * * *

i

TH-232

12

S4( 4/ 4)*C30

67( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 27- 82)* * ( S2- 82)* *

I-131

3* ND * * *

g * * * * * *

co * * * * * * *

DA-140

9* ND * * * *

RU-106

22

ND * * * * '

a * * *

l 1

CS-137

3* 6( 2/ 4)*C30

6( 1/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4

l * * * ( S- 6)* * *

j* * * * * * *

4

ZR- 95

4* ND * * * *

MN- 54

S* 9( 1/ 4)*C29

9( 1/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4

i ,

ZN-65

6* ND * * *

a * * * * * *

1 * * * * * * *

K-40

69

2327( 4/ 4)*C30

2999( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * * ( 68- 3930)* * ( 68- 3930)*

ii I

t O rabie III-26 MARINE PLANT PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile 1

Gamma Analysis Ra-226 624 3300 56.5 50.5 106.3 Th-232 --

280 54.0 54.3 98.4 I-131 <10 37 <0.6 <.9 <2.0 Ba-140 <10 75 <1.9 <2.1 <6.4 Ru-106 -- 3ca <4.9 <5.4 <16.3 Cs-137 <10 181 <2.6 <2.9 <8.9

~

Zr-95 18 157 <0.8 <1.0 <2.9 O Mn-54 -- 43 <1.1 <2.9 <10.9 Zn-65 --

156 <1.3 <1.5 <4.4 K-40 1508.4 12570 1654.5 2326.8 7461.9 Strontium Analysis Sr-89 -- --

8.5 21.1 78.9 Sr-90 -- --

2.0 2.5 8.4 i

1 39 r = ~ n... _ _ _ _ . m _.~... crr , __ nnrc c- . ..-x - - -- - n. ;;;TCxxxC; rz r J T- 2-- --

O O O

'" w W Table III-27

I f i ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

I

{ CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/81 PATHWAY I. TYPE & NO. I LLD l' ALL LOCATIONS- I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR ;

- - - - n*****x************u**x*********Kn******u**********ns********k********x**********

,r * * * * * *

'; MAR. PLANT a * * * * * *

' (PCI/KC)

RRB9/90 * * * * *

SEAFOOD CH

ANALYSIS 4* * * * * *O a * * * * *

i a a * * * *

4

ER-09

3* 27( 3/ 4)*C30

35( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * * ( 6- 65)* * ( 6- 65)* *

x * ** * * *

t a e * * * *

i

SR-90

0* 5( 2/ 4)*C29

6( 1/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

) * * ( 4- 6)* * * *

!t 4

I a i o i,

f 21 jI i

i

4 I 4 i>

li !

1 i ;i i

i4 h

4

}

1 tacesttow CaA8 eatsway O

The Univers;^y has the responsibility to collect and analyze crabs. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The sununary for the gansna analysis of the edible portion of semiannual sam-ples is in Table III-28. All samples were collected and analyzed. Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-29.

Except for naturally occurring K-40, the 1980 operational concentrations are less than the preoperational concentrations and consistent with previ-ous years' operational concentrations.

O 1

i O

41 l

.-:-.-=._-- :-. ; --.--. :=: = -_. -

i s a 3 Table III-28 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302

.l CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 f, PATHWAY I TYPE & NO. I LLD I ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION I NRL 00***********************************************************v*******************I CRABS * * * * * * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * * * *

ENGESTION

ANALYSIS 4 * * * * *

O

'li * * * * * * *

RA-226

13

102( 4/ 4)*C30

130( 2)* 130( 2/ 2)*

( 69- 190)*

( 2/

69- . 190)** ( 69- 190)*

TH-232

12

2O( 4/ 4)*C30

30( 2/ 2)* 30( 2/ 2)*

* * ( 24- 30)* * ( 29- 30)* ( 29- 30)* ,

I-131

7* ND * * * *

* * * * *

i k * * * * * * *

DA-140

23

ND * * * *

RU-106

56

ND * * *

i

CS-137

7* 11( 3/ 4)*C30

11( 2/ 2)* 11( 2/ 2)*

* * ( 10- 12)* * ( 10- 12)* ( 10- 12)*

ZR-95

11

ND * * * *

CS-134

7* 8( 1/ 4)*C29

8( 1/ 2)* O( O/ 2)*

MN-54

6* ND * * *

il * * * * * *

i

ZN-65

16

ND * * *

j * * * * * * *

't * * * * * * *

!

K-40

78

1969( 4/ 4)*C30

2630( 2/ 2)* 2630( 2/ 2)* '

* * ( 226- 2830)* * ( 2430- 2830)* ( 2430- 2830)*

Table III-29 i

i INGESTION CRAB PATHWAY

STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Control Stations Critical Stations

! Median % Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile l Ra-226 1325 3600 75.0 102.3 217.3 129.5 297.2 75.0 88.9 li j' Th-232 92 170 29.0 28.0 33.3 29.5 30.9 26.5 33.4 I-131* <10 <10 1.8 1.8 2.3 1.8 2.4 1.8 2.4 Ba-140 <10 55 5.9 5.8 7.1 5.9 6.9 5.8 7.8 ,

O Ru-106 -- --

14 13.9 16.7 14.1 17.2 55 68.9 f Cs-137* <10 75 10 8.4 17.6 11.0 13.8 5.8 17.5 I! Zr-95 <10 13 3.0 2.7 3.5 2.6 3.0 2.8 4.1 ,

t' j

Cs-134* <10 <10 1.6 3.3 9.5 1.9 2.2 4.8 13.8 Mn-54 <80 24 1.5 1.5 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.2 Zn-65 <160 127 4.1 4.0 5.2 4.1 5.2 3.9 5.6 K-40 1424.6 2011.2 2410.0 1%9.0 4279.6 2630.0 3184.4 1308.0 4307.2 _,

i

Critical nuclides for critical station

, t

/

3 O iactstion c^awivoaous riss extawar The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze carnivorous fish. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Ganna Analysis The sunnary for the ganna analysis of the edible portion of semiannual sam-ples is in Table III-30. All samples were collected and analyzed. Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational

. data is presented in Table III-31.

The operational concentrations for 1980 are less than the preoperational concentrations and consistent with previous years' operational concentra-tions.

O i

~

O 44

.. . . :::=: z - , . :_ =- _. --..--,.:.--,. . - - n- - : : . . : :: -

ii 8 % S ,

Table III-30 ls ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

l t CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80

i

! PATHWAY I TYPE & NO. I LLD 1 ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CON TROL LOCATION ************

INR i

e**************************************************s*******y*****g*******************

C. FISH * * * * * * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * * * * *

, INGESTION

ANALYSIS 4 * * * * *

O.

g

RA-226

11

63( 4/ 4)*C30

76( 2/ 2)* 76( 2/ 2)*

* * ( 22- 85)* * ( 67- 85)* ( 67- 85)*

TH-232

10

29( 4/ 4)*C30

34( 2/ 2)* 34( 2/ 2)*

* * ( 20- 41)* * ( 26- 41)* ( 26- 41)*

I-131

7* ND * * *

A * * * * * * *

DA-140

22 * .ND * * ,

RU-106

47

ND * * * *

CS-137 * .6* 21( 4/ 4)*C29

23( 2/ 2)* 20( 2/ 2)*

* * ( 6- 39)* * ( 6- 39)* ( 12- 27)*

ZR-95

10

ND * * * *

CS-134

7* ND * * * * ,

MN-54

6* ND * * * *

ZN-65

14

ND * * *

i

K-40

79

2868( 4/ 4)*C30

2985( 2/ 2)* 2985( 2/ 2)* j

* * ( 1630- 3870)* * ( 2840- 3130)* ( 2840- 3130)* :

O O O 4

Table III-31 :

4 INGESTION CARNIV0ROUS FISH PATHWAY ,

j STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

l , Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Control Stations Critical Stations

, Median 95 Percentile Median Mean % Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile J

I Ra-226 335 2400 71.5 76.0 100.9 62.5 117.3 49.0 123.8 Th-232 --

92 26.5 28.5 45.9 33.5 54.3 23.5 33.2 j; I-131* <10 <10 <1.6 <1.6 <1.6 <1.8 <1.8 <1.5 <1.5 l

.j Ba-140 <10 72 <5.4 <5.4 <6.5 <5.9 <6.2 <4.9 <5.2 (-

& Ru-106 -- --

<10.3 <11.8 <15.5 <13.4 <15.1 <10.3 <10.3 Cs-137* <10 43 18.5 21.0 50.2 19.5 40.3 22.5 68.2 Zr-95 <10 12 <2.4 <2.4 <3.0 <2.6 <3.0 <2.1 <2.5 A .i

!l Cs-134* <10 <10 <1.6 <1.7 <2.2 <1.9 <2.2 <1.5 <1.5 i

j' l Mn-54 <80 <80 <1.4 <1.4 <1.7 <1.5 <1.5 <1.3 <1.3 ,

4 i Zn-65 <160 99 <3.6 <3.6 <4.4 <3.9 <4.2 <3.3 <3.9 i

, K-40 2346.4 3854.8 2%5.0 2867.5 4694.3 2985.0 3386.9 2750.0 5854.5 l

Critical nuclides for critical station ,

i 1 i

r i'

. . - . .L . .. :. ~ ~ ' L : L ~ J - L ... ....... . ^ ^ ' ~ ~ ~

^^- ~

. ~ ^ L: ... . . . - . .

4 E

Q INGESTION HERBIVOROUS FISH PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze herbivorous 3

fish. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gama Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the edible portion of semiannual sam-ples is in Table 111-32. No samples were caught during either semiannual period at the control location C30. All other samples were collected and analyzed. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a compari-son with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-33.

The 1980 operational concentrations are generally lower than preoperational concentrations and are consistent with 1979 operational concentrations.

1 I

l O

47 1 ~~~ - - ..

i ,, ..- . ::.:.L . :::: ;_. L- _ , _, __,___, _ , _ 3_33_ _

j O O O w s u Table III-32

, ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 .

CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/00-12/31/80 y

PATHWAY l TYPE & NO. I LLD ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST NEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INR>

3-

o**************************************************************************************************s*j 1

i 3 g

~

H. FISH * * * * * * * '

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * * * *

li INGESTION

ANALYSIS 4* * * * *

O i i * * * * * *

4 * * * * * *

4

RA-226

13

36( 2/ 2)*C29

36( 2/ 2)* ND *

* * ( 10- 61)* * ( 10- 61)* *

TH-232

13

2O( 2/ 2)*C29

20( 2/ 2)* ND *

* * ( 14- 26)* * ( 14- 26)* *

I-131

6* ND * * *

a * * * * * *

m * * * * * *

3

DA-140

23

ND * * *

t * * * * * *

I * * * * * * *

RU-106

56

ND * * *

t * * * * * *

j

CS-137

7* 23( 2/ 2)*C29

23( 2/ 2)* ND *

( 18- 28)* * ( 18- 28)*

4

ZR-95

11

ND * * * *

r * * * * * *

i

CS-134

7* 9( 1/ 3)*C29

9( 1/ 2)* O( O/ 0)* a

* * * * * *

1 1 * * * * * * *

MN-54

7* ND * * *

i 4 * * * * * * *

!

ZN-65 * .17

ND * * * * ,

1 * * * * * * * ; 1 4 * * * * * *

t

K-40

90

3125( 2/ 2)*C29

3125( 2/ 2)* ND

i

*- * ( 2910- 3340)* * ( 2910- 3340)*

i .

, i

O O O

~i.

i

!! Table 111-33

I

<i INGESTION HERSIV0ROUS FISH PATHWAY

j STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

}t

i

-Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Control Stations Critical Stations Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Ra-?26 960 3100 - - - - -

35.5 106.2

j Th-232 --

84 - - - - -

20.0 36.6

'i 1-131* <10 <10 - - - - -

<1.5 <2.2 Ba-140 <10 50 - - - - -

<5.8 <8.5 ,

fl @ Ru-106 --

90 - - - - -

<13.9 <17.7

.i ; !,

4 j Cs-137* <10 110 - - - - -

<2.3 <36.9 Zr-95 <10 9 - - - - -

<2.8 <3.4 Cs-134* <10 <10 - - - - -

<5.4 <15.4 li Mn-54 <80 <80 - - - - -

<1.6 <2.0 il j' Zn-65 <160 63 - - - - -

<4.1 <5.2 i

K-40 2178.8 3100.6 - - - - -

3125.0 3720.9 ii ,

i

Critical nuclides for critical station '

i, it

'- I .

i

~

-JT__ -...- - - .- . . - - - -- w Q INGESTION OYSTERS PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze oysters.

There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the edible portion of semiannual samples is in Table III-34. All samples were collected and analyzed.

There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-35.

The 1980 operational concentrations are consistent with the 1979 operation-al and lower than the preoperational concentrations.

O 50 l

l 1

w--s - a s. _ _

O O O v v .

Table III-34 4

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/00-12/31/00

! -PATHWAY- I TYPE & N3. I LL I .ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION CONTROL LOCATION I NRI 4*********************************D***********************************************!

j OYSTERS * * * * * * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * *. * *

i INGESTION

ANALYSIS 4* * * * * *O

RA-226

14

66( 4/ 4)*C29

75( 2/

1-

*

34-2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

( 99)* * ( 50- 99)*

l

TH-232

11

31( 4/ 4)*C29

33( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

.l * * * ( 19- 38)* * ( 31-4i * *

34)* *

'l i I-131

7* ND * * * *

) $ * * * * * *

i

BA-140

24

ND * * *

t * * * * * *

* * *i

.t

RU-106

57

ND *

i l, * * * *

j * * * * *

l

CS-137

7* 8( 2/ 4)*C30

8( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( B- 8)* * ( 8-j * *

8)*

4' * * * * * * *

ZR-95

11

ND * *

k * * * * * * *

!

MN-54

7* ND * * * *

ZN-65 *

15

ND * * *

4 1

K-40

58

122O( 4/

4)*C30

1330( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4

i; * ( 1000- 1360)* * ( 1300- 1360)*

t ,

l

~_.J ..

~ ~ ^

J .. ..L._ . :- : :.. - .

O "'- 5 INGESTION OYSTERS PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 --

534 66.0 66.3 124.2 3 Th-232 -- -- 32.5 30.5 46.5 1

I-131 <10 <10 <1.8 <1.8 <2.4 Ba-140 <10 <10 <5.4 <5.9 <8.3 Ru-106 --

82 <13.0 <14.1 <21.3 Cs-137 <10 <10 <5.1 <5.1 <11.7 Zr-95 <10 <10 <2.6 <2.7 <3.5 Mn-54 <80 <80 <1.5 <1.6 <2.5 O zn-65 <160 33 <3.8 <3.6 <4.6 K-40 -- 1843.6 1260 1220.0 1528.7 O .

52 i

.'Me g.wg,,p.p.._,.-,_e_9y_my,,.,_ ,,,_v__,_ ,, .p_y_ . p _ , . ___ _

INGESTION SHRIMP PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze shrimp. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gama Analysis The sumary for the gama analysis of the semiannual samples is in 4

Table III-36. All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no crit-ical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the . operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-37.

The 1980 operational concentrations are consistent with the 1979 operation-al and the preoperational concentrations.

i d

O J

O 53 9'" 'e * *' 7 p--w. ,-r--es , vi+vs - -, m-,, ,*wq .,,.s.p-y-,y,,ew,+--.-wm. --=.w

, 9m,.grcmm,.w.,-.~.p.,ws9w.,,aum.,y-y,,,e-+--.*wy-e-+y-,,w.+tpww"----'*=-r*v i--e-t

)

l v

! Table III-36 i

i ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY I TYPE t< NO. I LLD l ALL LOCATIONS 1 HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION IN

- - - - RR SHRIMP * * * * * * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * * * *

INGESTION

ANALYSIS 2* * * * *

O

RA-226

31

102( 1/ 2)*C27

102( 1/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4

j

TH-232

15

S6( 2/ 2)*C27

56( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 47- 65)* * ( 47- 65)* *

I-131

8* ND * * *

cn

DA-140

30

ND * * * *

RU-106

72

ND * * * *

CS-137

9* 13( 2/ 2)*C27

13( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 11- 15)* * ( 11- 15)*

1

ZR-95

15

ND * * * *

* * * * *

1

MN-54

8* ND * * * * !

* * * * *

I

ZN-65

20

ND * * *

I * * * * * * *

K-40

93

2412( 2/ 2)*C27

2412( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 2340- 2483)* * ( 2340- 2483)*

t 6

1 4

LJ -... , - - - .

'*"'-7 O

INGESTION SHRIMP PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 -- --

<56.0 <56.0 <183.5 Th-232 --

36 56.0 56.0 80.9 I-131 <10 <10 <1.9 <1.9 <2.9 Ba-140 <10 <10 <7.5 <7.5 <11.7 Ru-106 -- --

<18.4 <18.4 <29.1 Cs-137 <10 37 13.0 13.0 <18.5 Zr-95 <10 <10 <3.4 <3.4 <6.5 Mn-54 <80 <80 <2.0 <2.0 <3.4 O Zn-65 <160 <160 <4.9 <4.9 <8.0 K-40 921.8 2514 2411.5 2411.5 2609.6 i

O 55 7_ - - _-.

^

INGESTION MILK PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze milk. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Monthly Gamma Analysis The sumary for the gamma analysis of the monthly samples is in Table III-35. The samples at Sample Station C49, the critical station for this pathway, were not collected due to the unavailability of milk. All other samples were collected and analyzed. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-39.

The 1980 operational concentrations are consistent with the 1979 operation-al, and lower than the preoperational concentrations.

Monthly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The sumary for the strontium analysis of monthly samples is in Table 111-40. All samples were collected and analyzed. Sample Station C49 is the critical station for this pathway and no samples were collected due to the unavailability of milk. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-39.

O The 1980 operational concentrations are less than the operational values L.) and are consistent with other operational concentrations.

O 56 pr*,- g y 9- , ,

.9.,,,..m._ , _ , , , _ _ _ , .-__ _

e 8 Table III-38 3

f ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAli

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 l CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY I TYPE & NO. I LLD l ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAli LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

- o**************************************************************p***************************************l MILK * * * * *

I (PCI/L)

CAMMA * * * * * * '

INGESTION

ANALYSIS 24 * * * * *

O i * * * * * * *

!

I -131

6* ND * * *

1 * * * * * * *

DA-140

21

28( 2/ 12)*C47

28( 2/ 12)* 28( 2/ 12)*

* * ( 21- 35)# * ( 21- 35)* ( 21- 35)*

CS-137

7* 11( 8/ 12)*C47

11( 8/ 12)* 11( 8/ 12)* '

* * ( 7- 15)* * ( 7- 15)* ( 7- 15)*

~

* * * * *

i

ZR- 95

11

ND * * * *

CS-134

8* ND * * *

i

* * * * *

l J * * * * * *

i

'

CO- 58

6* ND * * * *

MN- 54

7* ND * * *

j

* * * * *

i

* * * * *

l

CO- 60

7* ND * * *

i f

6

O O O i

f '

Table 111-39 ,

{ INGESTION MILK PATHWAY

I STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pC1/kg) r ii !

i>

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Control Stations Critical Stations Il Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile l Ganma Analysis

! I-131* <10 <10 <1.3 <1.4 <2.6 <1.6 <2.7 NC/M NC/M 2

Ba-140 <30 <30 <3.5 <4.8 <9.6 <5.1 <9.1 NC/M NC/M

Cs-137 16 22 <11.0 <12.6 <29.7 <7.7 <16.7 NC/M NC/M i i !

g Zr-95 <20 <20 <3.1 <3.3 <10.2 <2.8 <5.0 NC/M NC/M

]j Cs-134 <10 <10 <2.3 <1.9 <3.9 <1.9 <3.4 NC/M NC/M Mn-54 <10 <10 <1.5 <1.4 <2.7 <1.7 <2.9 f NC/M NC/M i]

1 Co-58 <10 <10 <1.5 <1.7 <4.6 <1.5 <2.7 NC/M NC/M j i

i ,!

4 Co-60 <10 <10 <2.1 <1.9 <3.9 <1.8 <3.1 NC/M NC/M i-l., i

!I Strontium Analysis

Sr-89 -- --

<6.3 <19.9 1

4 j Sr-90 4.0 6.0 <0.8 <3.0 tl i

Critical nuclides for critical station ;

i 4

4

O O O

-. v %,

Table III-40 ENVIRONMENTAL RA"IOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUG COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/B0

)

i PATHWAY l TYPE & NO. I LLD 1 ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR 1

* * * * *

3 l

a * * * * * .-

t1 ILK *

(PCI/L)

SR 89/90 * *

INGESTIOl4

ANALYGIS 24 * * * * *

O !.

a * * * * *

t a * * * * * *

SR- 89

3a 10( 6/ 10)*C47

10( 6/ 10)* 10( 6/ 10)*

* * ( 4- 23)* * ( 4- 23)* ( 4- 23)*

a * * * * * *

!

SR- 90

0* 2( 4/ 10)*C47

2( 4/ 10)* 2( 4/ 10)*

* * ( 1- 3)* * ( 1- 3)* ( 1- 3)*

$ I

,i-l 1

-1

~

\

. t' 4

Q INGESTION ANIMAL PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze small terres-trial animals. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The sumary for the gama analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-41. All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-42.

The operational concentrations for 1980 are consistent with the 1979 opera-tional and lower than the preoperational concentrations except for Cs-137 and Ra-226. Cs-137 is still elevated due to residual Chinese weapons test fallout; Ra-226 concentrations are similar to preoperational concentration.

O l

l I

l l

i O

60 l

~:::~: : ~ 2 - ., -. :,7 _2 ,_ _ . - - . z : .: - - ,._ -.__. :: : : L :.. - ~ : - ... :, .- ~ ::::

q p

< t i q)

Table III-41 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD OJ/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY ! TYPE & NO. I LLD 1 ALL LOCATIONS I IIIGHEST MEAN ' LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR'

- - - - n**************************4*******p**************************

ANIMALS * * * * * * *

(PCI/L)

GAMMA * * * * *

INGESTION

ANALYSIS 2* * * * * *0

RA-226

16

64( 2/ 2 64( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

( 22- 106)*C45

)*

( 22- 106)*

1

TH-232

12

21( 2/ 2)*C45

21( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 8- 34)* * ( 8- 34)* *

I-131

9* 3( 1/ 2)*C45

3( 1/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

BA-140

26

ND * * * *

RU-106

52

ND * * * * '

CS-137

16

2890( 2/ 2)*C45

2890( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 20- 5760)* * ( 20- 5760)* *

ZR-95

6* ND * * *

n * * * * * * ,

MN-54

4* ND' * * * *

ZN-65

8* ND * * * *

K-40

42

1252( 2/ 2)*C45

1252( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 * :

* * ( 303- 2200)* * ( 303- 2200)* * !

i

~

Table III-42 4

INGESTION ANIMALS PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 --

720 64.0 64.0 180.4 Th-232 -- --

<21.0 21.0 57.0 1-131 <10 100 <3.3 <3.3 <3.9 Ba-140 <10 <10 <6.5 <6.5 <18.3 Ru-106 -- --

<13.0 <13.0 <37.9

Cs-137 <10 80 2890.0 2890.0 10845.2 Zr-95 <10 70 <1.5 <1.5 <3.6 l Mn-54 <80 <80 <0.9 <0.9 <1.9

, O Zn-65 <160 160 <2.0 <2.0 <4.8 K-40 1656.5 3586.6 1251.5 1251.5 2880.6 O

62

. . . : _ . .- _. 1-. ... .- .-_.-_. _ . TZZZZEE. .-, . _. l . - ._ . .-._, ,_ __ _ Z.Illl l___ ,-.[J. 2. . li . --.. ,--[i-.. .--,

.w w

'ro+ - + - --E # hJ, Meduq %, m ,a ,%We -wu

, -wh ,h. m e w 2--em- - h e4 O-W y%w- w a- # 'Whh e e 94- -i-FOOD CHAIN (GRASSES) PATHWAY O The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze grass samples.

There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-43. All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no criti-cal stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is } retented in Table III-44.

The 1980 operational concentrations are similar to the 1979 operational and preoperational concentrations except for Ra-226, Th-232 and Cs-137. Cs-137 is still elevated due to residual Chinese weapons test fallout; Ra-226 and Th-232 are both naturally occurring and their concentrations are consistent with preoperational data.

O O

63

.- ::::~~ .:::. . ;:: :rz__ -._ ;;_ L;~;T.L _L,. :;;_ _; ___

^

8 . S S Table III-43 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY l TYPE & NO. I LLD I ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR ooo****************************************************************************************************I GRASS * * * * * * *

(PC1/L) u GAMMA * * * * *

FOOD CHAIN

ANALYSIS 6* * * * *

0

RA-226

16

107( 6/ 6)*C41

131( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 63- 157)* * ( 128- 133)* *

* *

y * *

TH-232

14

111( 6/ 6)*C41

145( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 56- 201)* * ( 88- 201)* *

* * * *

k

I-131

8 *. ND * * * *

DA-140

25

ND * * * *

RU-106

54

82( 1/ 6)*C05

82( 1/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

CS-137

7* 256( 6/ 6)*C05

308( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 12- 513)* * ( 118- 498)* *

2R-95

11

ND * * * * ,

MN-54

7* ND * * * *

ZN-65

15

ND * * * *

K-40

72

1715( 6/ 6)*C40

1915( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

, * * * ( 1420- 2290)* * ( 1540- 2290)* *

~ ~~

--- .L

^

*~-

Table III-44 ;

FOOD CHAIN (GRASSES) PATHWAY.

1 STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 --

2363 108.5 106.7 181.3

^

Th-232 --

120 78.0 111.3 246.3 I-131 <10 <10 1.9 <2.0 <3.1 1 Ba-140 26 253 <6.3 '<6.2 <8.4 Ru-106 -- --

<14.1 <25.0 <79.8 Cs-137 1363 5416 223.5 255.8 689.7 i

Zr-95 <10 31 <2.8 <2.8 <3.2 Mn-54 -- --

<1.6 <1.6 <2.1

~

, O Zn-65 --

589 <3.e <3.8 <5.r

! K-40 578.2 2430.2 1600.0 1715.0 2350.0 i

I l

l 1

1 I

i l0 65 N -. - 1 = _.2: = . :: = = = = 2. .- - = - = - , . ::: = 2 = -. -

_ . _ _ _ . _ - . . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ .

O INGESTION FOOD CROPS (CITRUS) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze citrus samples.

There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Annual Gansna Analysis The sununary for the gansna analysis of the annual samples is in Table 111-45. All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-46.

The 1980 operational concentrations were nondetectable as were the 1979 operational and preoperational concentrations.

O O

66

t t S Table III-45 i

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOOICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTINO PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY I TYPE t< NO. I LLD I ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION I NR R' co************************************************3************3****************************************'

CITRUS * * * ** * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * ** *

INGESTION

ANALYSIS 1 * * ** * *

I-131

24* ND # * * *

BA-140

24* ND * * * *

CD-58

24* ND * * * *

CS-137

24* ND * * * *

CS-134

24* ND * * * *

MN-54

21* ND * * * *

ZN-65

42* ND * * * *

CO-60

24* ND * * *

t

! I

._. . . - _ . ~ __ _ _ _ _ - - _ .

. - . _.._____.,_e.

Table III-46 Q

INGESTION FOOD CR0PS (CITRUS) PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile I-131 <10 <10 <6.0 <6.0 --

Ba-140 <10 <10 <6.0 <6.0 --

Co-58 <10 <10 <6.0 <6.0 --

Cs-137 <10 <10 <6 0 . <6.0 --

Cs-134 <10 <10 <6.0 <6.0 --

Mn-54 <10 <10 <5.3 <5.3 --

Zn-65 -- -- <10.5 <10.5 --

Co-60 <10 <10 <6.0 <6.0 --

4 0 a

i I

O 68 y.-g- p--g- -gw-w--ww-,-.e.4,-wrwewisc---,,p+9.-gm.--- y-p m-e_ g.r y w--y wry e- -, y 9 9-m g-g,y y.-s-wi--e9 w4.ps-. -g--me-9-=-.ee .y-.w g y --9--st- a*-wpa_wp,.i - e- m * --

i INGESTION FOOD CR0PS (WATERMELON) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze watermelon samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Annual Gamma Analysis The sumary for the gama analysis of the ar.nual samples is in Table III-47. All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table III-48. There are no preoperational data for this pathway. All 1980 operational analyses resulted in non-detectable activity as did the 1979 operational analyses.

O i

1 l

i O

l 69 i

l

~ '

,_ ~.1 ~ ~.l., ..il.'Z..' .,[Tl2 _ _.__ . _ ,_ _ _,__.

._Z,.._..._....~_, .~_Z_.___.._

i 8 8 9(s Table III-47 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY I TYPE & NO. I LLD I ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST.MEAN LOCATIO I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

- - - - N WATERMELON * * * ** * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * ** *

INGESTION

ANALYSIS 1 * * ** * *

I-131

24* ND ** *

t

BA-140

24* ND ** * *

CD-08

24* ND ** * *

* * ** e *

CS-137

24* ND ** *

y * * * ** * *

CS-134

24* ND ** * *

MN-54

21* ND ** * *

ZN-65

42* ND ** * *

CD-60

24* ND ** *

t t

4 k

i l-i

-~

Q Table III-48 INGESTION FOOD CR0PS (WATERMELON) PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Operational Values Mean 95 Percentile I-131 <6.0 --

Ba-140 <6.0 --

Co-58 <6.0 --

Cs-137 <6.0 --

t Cs-134 <6.0 --

1 Mn-54 <5.3 --

Zn-65 <10.5 --

Co-60 <6.0 --

O O

71 7 .-- . - _ _ _ _ _ _

2__.-.. .._.-.-..._- __ . . . . _ . _ _ _ . .._ _ . . . m _

O r000 caatu (Sott) erraway f

The University of Florida has the responsibility to collect and analyze soil samples. Soil samples are required every third year. The last sample

. . was taken in 1978, therefore, no sampling was required in 1980.

f I

O 1

l t

l l

l O

t 72

-,...-,,...--.._.,-,,_,.........,-=..=....=-..--au:..,_====.=- -

%a_m.. ~ >A J._m.A_,s.=--,_444.-- %, . _Aq- - 4 4-44-. u J _.-.A4~2g. n mm L 2mm.- ---4m. .w_,w r_,_ m m.

,,, --.C=h..a e.m - se-- u4,s- e as. -. m u,4,--

,ewww, e

wo me- " * * - "aba.eA r. a'# 4d '.eea MM ' - -*h WW *

.w m mw e

i i

t Table III-49

-Q FOOD CHAIN (S0IL) PATHWAY 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMULY i

I~

i l

T

, NOT REQUIRED IN 1980 f

J i

4 I

1 i1 G :

l.

t l

l l [

t i :

e 1

O 73 ,

-t

- - . ~ n .. . _ ,._,_ __ , , _ , _ , _,_ . ,

- - - - - - r- - -

9weweg 9-tww

,4e4 e *4aw**em.4 -*W ed -4 = -- -* * * * "

,,e ., --

Table III-50 FOOD CHAIN (S0IL) PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES NOT REQUIRED IN 1980 O

1 O

74 l . - . ~ .. . _ . . - . _ - . _ , , . - . .

FOOD CHAIN (MEAT) PATHWAY The State has the responsf aility to collect and analyze meat samples.

There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gama analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-51. All samples were collected and analyzed. There is no critical station in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data is presented in Table III-52. There are no preoperational data for this pathway. All 1980 operational analyses resulted in nondetectable activity which is consistent with previous operational analyses.

4 f

}

O 75

, ,.-,--.m v -.%--- .. -. -r---.-,.,,,,-...-we, .-.r., ..--,v...- . ,,,- -y.. .w.~.-. --m - ,., , ,, _ .v-.-c.,

Table III-51 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYM RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302

ITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY I TYPE t< NO. I LLD I ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST NEAN LOCATIO I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

- n***************************************************************************N

- - - - w**********

MEAT * * * * * * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * * * *

FOOD CHAIN

ANALYSIS 2* * * * * *0

I-131

38

ND * * * *

* * * * *

i

DA-140

39

ND * * * *

CO-58

60

ND * * * *

CS-137

37

ND * * *

M * * * * * * * .

CS-134

60

ND * * * *

MN-54

32

ND * * *

i

ZN-65

66

ND * * * *

CD-60

60

ND * * *

i i

k i

e--se ww.- ande m -

)

4 Table III-52 Q

FOOD CHAIN (MEAT) PATHWAY I

STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Operational Values i

Mean 95 Percentile J

I-131 <9.5 <9.5 Ba-140 <9.8 <9.8 Co-58 <15.0 <15.0 Cs-137 <9.25 <9.25 l Cs-134. <15.0 <15.0 j

Mn-54 <8.0 <8.0 Zn-65 <16.5 <16.5 Co-60 <15.0 - <15.0 i

1 l

t l

a O

77 i

l lNN ~ Il~A l - ,. - Al^ . .---.AA,~ A L,.~...,, A L ,,, _,- ,---n AI N-, n,-.,n

, ,.. A Al_, c-.-,-. -

- ?- A', - , .. ,

_ _ . _ . '._._.-^:.. :;.r r -

.1. .:.1

~ ~ - ~

1__ _n . . - . _ . . .

2 Q FOOD CHAIN (POULTRY) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze poultry samples.

There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis i The sumary for the gama analysis of the semiannual samples is in l Table III-53. All samples were collected and analyzed. There is no criti-cal station in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data is in Table III-54. There are no preoperational data for this pathway.

The 1980 operational concentrations were nondetectable as were the 1979 operational concentrations.

O i

i r

O 78 7 - _

s

(

8 \s Table III-53 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY I TYPE & NO. I LLD 1 ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR ocu*************************************************************************************************a**

POULTRY * * * ** * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * ** *

FOOD CHAIN

ANALYSIS 2* * ** * *O

I-131

3B

ND ** * *

DA-140

39

ND ** * *

CO-SB

60

ND ** * *

* * ** *

t u

CS-137

37

ND ** *

e * * * ** * *

* * ** *

r

CS-134

60

ND ** * *

MN-54

32

ND ** * *

ZN-65

66

ND ** * *

CO-60

60

ND ** *

I i

___ _ . . _ ._ _ _ m .. : -- - ..--. __. .

i i

i Table III-54 FOOD CHAIN (POULTRY) PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Operational Values Mean 95 Percentile i 1-131 <9.5 <9.5 Ba-140 <9.8 <9 8

. Co-58 <15.0 <15.0 1

t Cs-137 <9.3 <9.3 !

1 j Cs-134 <15.0 <15.0 i

Mn-54 <8.0 <8.0

- Zn-65 <16.5 <16.5 Co-60 <15.0 <15.0 O

i, 1

1 i

I i

l l

l O

80 "t* "Y'T P +g-a-'tw pqv-4 **-"tff Ft MeDrWW-7 -My'49='** wqr gry p- TW em-NF4gre-Mads' m *w $ ' 3g*T W TT'M ve y ty' N4e' w*N*19 e "E m *upr'm- W= W ehq er9m ' M m e-% ggwm wgeyseN9g r9y=t eme$-' g qqFT

._ - .._ _ . 1. _

-~~

O FOOD CHAIN (EGGS) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyse egg samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Semiannual Gansna Analysis The sunenary for the gansna analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table 111-55. All samples were collected and analyzed. There is no criti-cal sample station in this pathway. A statistical evalution of the opera-tional data is presented in Table 111-56. There are no preoperational data for this pathway and all 1980 operational analyses resulted in nondetect-able activity as did all 1979 operational analyses.

l O

4 O

81

~

-. - -. :.- . ::TL _ _ _; 3 ,' ; _ _ , _,._ , __ ;; ; 3 3 ; ; ; 3 -- ;;_ -_ -;

,rm (y is ) U h r%

G Table III-55 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY TYPE & NO. I LLD ALL LOCATIONS I HIG MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

- - - - k*HEST I l

- - - - u*p**********************************

ECCS * * * * * * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * * * *

FOOD CHAIN

ANALYSIS 2* * * * * *0

, * * * * * *

t

I-131

38

ND * * * *

DA-140

39

ND * # * * ,

CO-58

60

ND * * *

co

CS-137

37

ND * * *

N * * * * * * *

CS-134

60

ND * * * *

MN-54

32

ND * * * *

ZN-65

66

ND * * * *

!

CO-60

60

ND * * *

l l

't ,

,i

"'-5' O i F000 CHAIN'(EGGS) PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Operational Values j

Mean 95 Percentile i

! I-131 <9. 5 <9 5 .

I Ba-140 ,

<9.8 <9.8

] Co-58 <15.0 <15 0- . ,

{ Cs-137 <9.3 <9.3 i

Cs-134 <15.0 <15.0

- Mn-54 <8.0 <8.0 4

i Zn-65 <16.5 <16.5 j Co-60 <15 0

. <15.0 i

O

]

1 1

1 l

2 e

5 4

1 O

- 83 gw - -aw#*w reme=gep; es+s+%-e----sup p _ % W p ,g e ,

y-==--t m *- w.y9%.c F-W-w-'egpmy==,*g9gw myep Wwy-w,9 g--wg,-weg g %yp y9 -y-9 vg q p.-p w y gy g 9 9 m+ o p gp=mmmm,wa- g -gwegspegw w- y , g pyNwe-499gep 4 -w g v ergNe e m we yw-en y ,y #g w-

i l

l FOOD CHAIN (GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES) PATHWAY b~

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze green leafy vegetable samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The sumary for the gama analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-57. All samples were collected and analyzed. The critical station for this type of analysis (Sample Station C48) is in the east sector at 4.0 miles from the plant. A statistical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table III-58. There are no preoperational data for this pathway.

The 1980 operational concentrations are less than the 1979 operational con-centrations except for Ra-226, Th-232 and K-40, all of which are naturally occurring.

Semiannual Sr-90 Analysis The analysis of the semiannual samples for S r-90 is presented in Table III-59. All samples were collected and analyzed. The critical station for this type of analysis is Station C-48. The critical station showed a Sr-90 concentration of 87 pCi/kg, which exceeded the control station concentration (no detectable activity) by more than ten times. LER No. 80-028/04T-0 was generated to report this occurrence.

O Resampie eaaissis coafirmed tne hi9h levei of Sr-90 was e vaiid fiadins.

Sr-89 was not detected in either original or follow-up sample. Operation of Crystal River Unit 3 is not believed to be responsible for this finding.

Supplemental LER 80-028/04T-1 supports this determination.

i O i

i 84

~- _., _ , . _ - _ , _ . _ . _

y -e ,- , , . . - - -

O O 04 v v v Table III-57 ENVIHONMEt1TAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUE COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/00 PATHWAY- l TYPE & NO. I LLD I ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHE NEAN LOCATION.I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

- - - - ST C. L. VEG. * . * * * * *

PCI/KG

GAMMA * * * * * *

ANALYSIS 6* * * * *

0

RA-226

15

76( 4/ 4)*C41

100( 2/ 2)* 2)*

j * *

53( 2/

( 48- 103)* * ( 96- 103)* ( 48- 58)*

I

TH-232

14

102( 4/ 4)*C47

150( 2/ 2)* 150( 2/ 2)*

* * ( 45- 171)* * ( 129- 171)*

( 129- 171)*

I-131

7* ND * * * *

BA-140

23

ND * * * *

',

RU-106

55

ND * * *

CS-137

7* 335( 4/ 4)*C41

657( 2/ 2)* 13( 2/ 2)*

* * ( 11- 1170)* * (

143- 1170)* ( 11- 14)*

ZR-95

11

ND * * * *

NN-54

6* ND * *

l ZN-65

17

ND * * *

l * * * * * *

K-40

79

2632( 4/ 4)*C47

3505( 2/ 2)* 3505( 2/ 2)*

* * ( 828- 4430)* * ( 25G0- 4430)* ( 2580- 4430)* !

i i

e -

I t

O O O -

Table III-58 FOOD CHAIN (GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES) PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg) f

' t Nuclide Operational Values i Control Stations Critical Stat %ns ,

) Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Pt.fosittle l

j Gansna Analysis

. t 5

Ra-226 76.3 129.8 53.0 60.1 99.5 109.2 l

Th-232 101.5 217.0 150.0 208.2 53.0 75.2 4

i 1-131* <1.75 <2.44 <1.50 <1.50 <2.00 <2.69

!l Ba-140 <5.69 <7.82 <5.00 <5.69 <6.38 <8.80

)

Ru-106 <13.7 <17.4 <12.6 <13.7 <14.8 <29.5 :' '

s Cs-137 334.5 1432.9 12.5 <16.7 656.6 2079.8 Zr-95 2.75 3.15 <2.63 <2.80 <2.88 <3.22 1.50 1.50 <1.50 <1.50 <1.50 <1.50 j!1 , Mn-54 I' Zn-65 4.12 4.76 <4.25 <4.94 <4.00 <4.69 K-40 2632.0 5515.6 3505.0 6069.0 1759.0 4340.0 4

$ i i Strontium Analysis {!

!i

4 . Sr-90 23.5 106.6 3.0 11.3 44.0 163.2

i i!

it

Critical nuclides for critical station

~

l' 1?

1

3 8 Table III-59 3

ENVIllONMEN TAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL HlVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUC CCUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHllAY I TYPC & NO. I 1.LD i ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR o**.n*******************x********************ap*****************************9******a.n**********n**s*****

a '

a a * * -

C.L.VEG a a * * * *

PCI/nO a GR- 9f) * * * * *

FOOD CHAIN a ANALYStB 4* * * * *

O a a a * * *

a * * * * * *

SR-90

1

31( 3/ 4)*C48

44( 2/ 2)* SEE COLUMN 4

a a * ( 1- 87)n * ( 1- 87)*

i i

l 1

r i

1

, i e

t

IV. EXTERNAL RADIATION The External Radiation portion of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (Specification 3.2.3) is split between the University and the State (See Table I-1). The University also has a TLD at Sample Station C47 and the State has additional TLDs at Sample Stations C04, C40, and C46. The summaries for the University's data is in Table IV-1 and for the State's data in Table IV-2. Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G are the critical stations in this pathway.

Table IV-3 presents a statistical sunnary of all data. The 1980 data from all TLD stations is consistent with the 1979 data and the preoperational data. Additionally, the critical stations and the control stations of the University also compare very well. However, because the University and the State use different types of TLDs, it is necessary to report their results separately.

O 1O l

88

~~

~'

.- : :..~-. . - l _ . JT - . '. T ~ . .

3 3 Table IV-!

8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCFdT NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIllD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PATHWAY I TYPE & NO. I LLD 1 ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR ooooo***#uo******************************w*************************************************************

j * * * * * *

AIR SUDMERSION * * * * * * *

(MREM /YR) * * * * * *

U OF F

EXTERNAL * * * * * *

RADIATION 36* iS

43( 34/ 34)*C41

49( 4/ 4)* 44( 23/ 23)* O n * * ( 27- SB)* * ( 40- 54)* ( 29- 58)*

P t

1 i

i l ,

7

(~

% )'

Table IV-2 ENVIRONMENTAL PADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM'

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/80-12/31/80 PCHWAY l TYPE & NO. I LLD ! ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST' MEA LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR

- - - - 3*************************************************g*y***N AIR mVDMERSILM * * * * * * *

(MREM /YR) * * * * * *

STATE

EXTERNAL * * * * * *

RADIATION 28* 20

SO( 28/ 28)*C26

130( 4/ 4)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 29- 160)* * ( 48- 160)*

o

)

i l

1 I

e t

~ . - . - . - - - . . .

f i

i Table IV-3 Q EXTERNAL RADIATION PATHWAY

! QUARTERLY TLD ANALYSIS (mrem /yr) ,

Median Mean 95 Percentile Value , Value Value Preoperational 62 -- 77 All Stations 42.0 46.4 97.9 i State 37.5 50.1 124.6 University (All Stations) 44.2 43.3 60.1 University (Critical Stations) 44.8 41.1 55.2 University (Control Stations) 45.5 44.4 62.2 t

O i

^

O 91

_ , , _ . , , , , , _ , . . _ , _ . _ , _ , , _ , , , _ , , , _ _ ,

ML20039B120

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML20039B120

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search