ML20027B672
| ML20027B672 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/05/1982 |
| From: | Andrea Johnson, Reinmuth G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20027B656 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-82-345, REF-QA-99900902 NUDOCS 8209290201 | |
| Download: ML20027B672 (4) | |
Text
~
^
l.,
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT q
January 20,1982 i
Docket No.:
'99900902/81-04
~
Environmental Qualification Program:
Phase II Test Program for Rosemount 1153 Series D and Foxboro N-E 10 Series Pressure Transinitters, Report No. 3,
. Normal (Nonaccident) Radiation Simulation Results Equipment Identification:
i Rosemount Test Specimen No.
Mod. No Tm Range i
R1 1153DD3 Differential 0-30 inches water R2 1153005 Differential 0-750 inches water R3 1153HD7 Differential 0-3000 psia R4 1153AD6 Absolute 15-100 psia R5 1153GD9 Gauge 0-3000 psig Foxboro F1 N-E11GM-HIE 2 Gauge 1600-2400 psig i
F2 N-E11GH-IIM2 Gauge 0-3000 psig 1
F3 N-E13DM-IIM1 Differential 30-150 inches water F4 N-E13DH-HIM1 Differential 0-200 inches water F5 N-E130H-IIH1 Differential 0-500 inches' water i
Test Organization:
Wyle Laboratories (Eastern Operations), Scientific Services and Systems, 7800 Governors Drive West, Huntsville, Alabama 35807 Contract No.:
Wisconsin Electric Power Company (For Utility Group), Purchase Order Number A-61384 Inspection Conducted:
November 17-20, 1981 RIV Inspector:
A A. R. Johnson, Equipment Qualific6 tion Engineer, Date Vendor Inspection Branch, Region IV s
Approved By:
A I Ct2 t 4
///dJd-G. W. Reinmuth, Chief, Vendor and Special Date Projects Branch, IE Summary:
The purpose of this inspection was to review the documented test records, completed by Wyle personnel, during the Normal (Nonaccident)
Radiation Tests, performed at the Frank H. Neely Nuclear Research B209290201 820826 PDR FotA YOUN082-345 PDR'
g j
. Center, Atlanta, Georgia, on September 1-5, 1981.
D. G. Mcdonald, NRC Consultant, Los Alamos National Laboratory and J. 'Benson, NRC Consultant, Sandia National Laboratories assisted in this inspection.
Results:
The review performed during this inspection indicated:
1.
The information and' data, called for by test procedures, were obtained during the test and documented accurately.
2.
All necessary information and data were collected to allow evaluation of test results in relation to the acceptance criteria.
3.
The test results were well within the prescribed margins of acceptance.
4.
Anomalies from the test plans and procedures were evaluated, corrected and documented.
]
Y 4
,-,.------g---------,m, g. -,- -,
,---,,,e
~
Details Section Prepared By:
A. R. Johnson A.
Persons Contacted Larry Frazier - Test Projects Manager, Wyle Laboratory Edward W. Smith - Director of Contracts & Purchasing, Wyle Laboratory William Voshalik - Project Engineer, Wyle Laboratory B.
General The purpose of the subject test program was to qualify pressure trans-mitters manufactured by Rosemount and Foxboro for use in safety-related systems in nuclear power generating stations.
Wyle qualification test plans No. 45352-1 and 4352-2, Rev. A, have incorporated the NRC staff's recommendations and resolved their concerns, and appear to meet the requirements of IEEE Std. 323-1974 and NUREG-0588, Rev. 1.
Wyle Laboratories development of test procedures, No. 45592-1, dated August 19, 1981, and No. 45592-2, dated July 1, 1981, have been approved for use in implementing the methodologies and requirement of these test plans.
The test procedures include checklist / data sheets which have been completed during the test program, providing auditable records of the qualification testing.
The purpose of this inspection conducted by the RIV NRC inspector was to review the documented test records, completed by Wyle personnel, during The Normal (Nonaccident), Radiation portion of the test program, conducted at the Frank H. Neely Nuclear Research Center located on the campus of Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, during the week of September 1-5, 1981.
A report of the tests conducted at Neely a s docu-mented in the Office of Inspection and Enforcement (Docket No. 99900902/
81-02, Report No. 2, dated December 8,1981).
Review of documented test records by the RIV NRC inspector during this inspection was performed, to i
monitor, maintain awareness, and obtain reasonable assurance, that test results were acceptable within prescribed margins to meet the IEEE Std. 323-1974 and NUREG-0588, Rev. I requirements.
The RIV NRC inspector accomplished this effort by review and inspection of checklist / data sheets, plots (radiation exposure verses error), tables, documented anomalies, qualification plans, test procedures, other selected documents, and discussion with Wyle Laboratory Test personnel.
C.
Normal Radiation Test documentation 1.
Objectives The objectives of the Normal Radiation (Nonaccident) documentation review during this inspection were:
To verify that the information and data, called for by Wyle test a.
l procedures, were obtained during the test and documented accurately.
. b.
To verify that all necessary information and data were included, to allow evaluation of test 'esults in relation to the acceptance-r criteria specified in the qualification plan and test procedures.
c.
To verify that test results are within the prescribed margins of acceptance to meet the Ccmmission's requirements of IEEE Std. 323-1974 and NUREG-0588,,Rev. 1.
d.
To verify that anomalies from the test plan and procedures were evaluated, corrected, and documented.
2.
Findings Test data was obtained on each transmitter upon arriving at a TID of 12 x 103 rads, 24 x 103 rads ad 3.5 x 104 rads during the Normal Radiation Test program.
The documented data sheets obtained at each of these intervals was plotted (radiation exposure verses error) for each transmitter at zero, 75% of calibrated span, and full span.
In addition, a table was prepared at each of these intervals, to show the calculated values of zero shift, 75% of span shift, full span shift, and accuracy of each span point.
All plots and tables showed transmitter outputs differing slightly from baseline data, well within the acceptable margins of 5.0%.
The 5-point calibration checks, voltage variation tests, and verification check that pressure and input voltage is returned to 75% of calibrated spen, also was well within the acceptable margins.
i Notice of Anomalies issued during this portion of the test, documented in the Office of Inspection and Enforcement Report No. 2, dated December 8,1981 (Docket No. 99900902/81-02), did not impact any data sheet accuracies as recorded.
3.
Summa ry l
The Normal (Nonaccident) Radiation Documentation and test records for i
the above subject electrical equipment, reasonably assures, as evidenced by test results within the prescribed margins, that the requirements of IEEE Std. 323-1974 and NUREG-0588, Rev. 1 for normal (nonaccident) radiation environment, have been met.
The results of this report will therefore be used by the NRC staff to evaluate the above subject equip-ment, pending completion of all environmental qualification tests as required by the Commission.
l
-