ML20024E332

Responds to NRC Re Emergency Preparedness Deficiencies.Corrective Action Plan Per 10CFR50.54 Encl

ML20024E332
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	07/15/1983
From:	Reinaldo Rodriguez SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To:	Martin J, Vickers R Federal Emergency Management Agency, NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
Shared Package
ML20024E324	List: ML20024E323 ML20024E328 ML20024E332
References
RJR-83-552, TAC-46265, NUDOCS 8308100257
Download: ML20024E332 (11)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:.

s.. d DISTRICT C 6201 S Straat. Box 158"11. Sacramertto. Califomis 958th (91

,a UTILITY [ SACPAMENTO MUNICIPAL _

I..

a..gn a RJR 83-552 July 15,1983 s J B PARTIN R L VICKERS REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR ^- sc; REGION V. . REGION IX .f ' 0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT ' MFEDERAL/ EMERGENCY:MANAGEM

1. ~

• ~ ' "

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COWilSSIDH ATTENTION K NAUMAN l 1450 t%RIA LANE SUITE 210 PROJECT OFFICE *t,. WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 PRESIDIO OF SAN FRANCISCO BLDG 105 SAN FRANCISCO CA! 94129 e NRC LETTER DATED JUNE 15. 1983, J. B. MARTIN TD-R. J. RODRIGUEZ g.p l V.,k 1 [* Pursuant to the above referenced letter, please find in Attachment.1 the '?

1 District's corrective action plan to address amorgency preparedness.deficiencie

Y.l'qSXi4here' documentation of completed [ work or work'.in? progre [l$ number}of the Etion p'lan.- W$44:.m -j d%sp%pg(the dndicite 4 4 provided -herein"a6d slabeled 'sslanlexhibit'in"stipport of

g. 4.,.,, y3

. w.., g 6 ,- Q ,( .m .gg m yq : xy ,33 3.. 4, Please feel free.to. contact R. -W. fiyers 'at extension60 Jf'f you'have 'questi,onsa u_

" m ' regarding this submissi'an or require additionaljinformation. y%

g/pyp ~ , nm,h,. w v. f: ^ .l f 7 [ iC'"" 9 rQ- .gy;}. g ft

y fe..

4 j & Tf ^k ? c

bll*~ &

x;~ g W-R. J. R iguez Executive Directori uclear ( ' %g;,~ wjyE.c: 2 .c 5 +,. . QQ Jp :~ m y c, a .j ~% Attachment 4 f' r >gl x' cc: S, M. Crowder w/atch 46 R. E. Baldaf n w/atch H. White w/atch J. Kearns w/atch 3T'm 4 .f % ' i :L 'l 2: 8308100257 830805 PDR ADOCK 05000312 ,c n ja,. q 2' u eqjs F PDR gw s b

• A8 r**ss'-

't y t 1 8 Y $(RJtML ?/ *I 4 f IW4% 6 fi l' J t! "# ' ' Id I

• I

~l" # A 8I '8 .=

M Q 5[dW W h -lg A , 7;/>Cr - ; i sM i% M2 . J. NN~ z*

• :' ~W g; y n. n % v ;y s W E,N h y : % mJa,.~, Qli w W~

\\ lO . w.. y y ~.,m ..,[; ~.,f.;;gg.p&a}Q-Q-p., ys g&.QQ. gy,, p_. y. 4.< :n::,q . n.. ;f Q%> 3 q &).3 m hgy m Q, &e w m w h m.y; f . ~ 3: m w. %. v y . c.: u 'iW - Q*.<L:Q hga:"yf ';Q ^ w 2lR 1 A .x 4- . a. e- <,o a. f RAaCHO SECD DERGENCY PREPAIEDIESS CORBGCTWE ACTIOl PLAu. V 'S ' ~ R ECSP0hSEPUS$UAhTT018CftM.54:(s)(2)(it)N.md((7

I' m

3 ..w: & X, %.:t: ' ..; ;.Wy+%ny,;4rr y.;q;s ^ . +a. w J7 Pro',ected Actual ' 4,,. w-t 3*; '- g

y< s;y -.

p -1 ye w .g M: 3

• 4,

. e ,._,cw - q w

1. 3 @ q,.M'

~ g~ M CFR Eefercoce CCrrective @i Adharity ' SupOCrt " CNpletion Completten Coeurentatten { Primary I t c*. ct RUREG C654 MC Action'r' "" Authority l Gale Ogg Y/M Tv3 L.Eynlaa Sttrafard. FDM Firdina g. ,%,J...a ef:q ,b. m. q ,..y -s; w. u- /R '.1 j ~... - 4.a i 20 b.? Emergency. Plan Procedarei ~. s N.7 'i' M,c ~~ nc w. r.. y Y. 3p;C vg: g $,1 y N cant. AP 528, which provides n rn's W me...'i._.,g .N M. ~ s ] _~ @ E a r guidance for recomeMing protective actions to the - apreopriatt local and state $/d y ^&. 3

. e

' '.s a-j- '~ -K w J- ~ authorities (Instruction. J,w. e. WR, 4 C u , i. ' 5.1 sf AP 528), did not MlN 4fR R '- ,p.FC . include estergen:y actico ~ctions that are b3 sed on ). Q g @::_r- . ;~ 1cteis or protect 1st 3 4 facility systen parm.ters. Tg M.g. .c , w%?* $,$*F l &y ~ ih . c. .p G-h,; 9 .; w n :o x v - _ N+. y f;ya. y W. "i; r .q L.;y, ' : .,,o u id &~- .a, ' h'e g ;;.W.w t...'*-], C 4',p,. h .W'.. 3;, n - -d c f ~' % *g ,-,,.p, g t g 3, ~~ -*R*h'.i.t..%)r*d2Cv,* y.' ' - ;; 3 l' \\?i lr* M4c Q =t* + ns '.Q y-@D ' ^ . h.~ 'A-

• ' 'sw

, -Q si f. Us: -. "N - L. t ; j.,,

=s

.p .h. 4 A^t Q.s% W.4,- .M at .H. W 9 z.? s r -ed 4;&y.4-a;. .,.%: n 1,,.,.

• . ~,,.

y ? c. ,..c a (- es, , 4,f g*M 4 h* ~ ^ G' 13A* s

• W.

M'* . o. xy.a..f. * [;. ~y_ t - V ,p r r L', + f a Ngb.=..*,y..,..N

• 9,.

y s ,s. v. + ,J t -pt Q ; W, .,,s >,m a -o- -s e: ,s, h, d '.;? . ',.w W,3.;h. w..., - 40.'

4..,.

W y M. .c .5 =t t.- - e. .'? ' .m n ',, '. l .TM..pg..w j% ~ MrQ h. 4. a ~ ,.( ~ ~ ,'; f.ws$.f.v..; _ j.,.,N, ;.., 4 ,r' a s; a -, s. - < p%.4 + v- ,c m . ~ -, .v. g... 4 .~n re + A,JRN

f~ l

• c;

.k

,$.,'r, - * ;*?*.>, 1., 4 ~. E. %g. r-, ' ;-A 1' .[ a. . 6 ;.1../. ' " e a . %,4m*

• gp

/. "," 6. -

• M f

g. . p. Ve,y f ~ s' gy - y a y y ; i;. > ; if %ne. R.; C$ y.* .o'I. f,' g, s y$** nl l s s p. f,- ~. -- h *.. 1 D',,7 ".k ) f4 [ -' ]. A IJ M "J ,$ j

• J'#

<h e a [' . % g )*' 'i

W >l::::. A g a;' .y .s.;RMCHO SECO EMEEGENCY PREPaarenMt (IBMCThWE'ACT20E'Ptalll hl ~,,,,,,, s f 3:$7., ' ^'i. 'M 4 s. $4b W- , RESP 0a.SE PURSUANT Q10'.CFRYA,54,(s)(2)(ii)Mk.c,.fg N W.J. , w. ' l.., _,. d: m ,. / m g.. e ,,.4 emshq,v 8_.. m yb.h. : m;tA.. # s... r +, . :n q; .A . g ' ' gs N 'g W L Projected ' Actual ';p, 'f O ~ w';3 %;.- e 4 p ' ? 1qay$p@g.h "':

1. n

..s. CrR Peferente O ^ e

ten or WiMEG %54

@C . Corrective W Prieary "- Support 1 " Completion Corpiction. Documentation: S. Planninn StvtlarL. fem Findina Actinn

• h E Autharttv~

Authoritv ~ Oate _ ,_J)1te YL11 Typt!;g + r' mQ mt w b H: MM 20 10 CFR 50~ N 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) requires Revise AP S M N Jtstrict;s W Qj J/M9/33,7;. ..K OhservableQ exercise. @ that a standard emergency clas, Reference AP S Mt $77J 6 N i_ % y &gd 3b 6 ~- GY~ App. E sification and action level inclassifica"l^ hp% b g MT. schere, the basis of which in-tien procedureti F0 J q.. /v^" N n c-i M cludes facility systsa ar.d ef- ~. f. g a g

p. 4.W "4

rc M-W - fluent parareters, be in use by e s.w..%,q _ f);& ' WE Myg j

• pkt; j

the 11conste fer deterednations-spDase sleasuresr In addition.- gy;p n.Q

• 7

~"V-y' of sdninm felttal offsite re 4 Gy i. @ ~~ i Section IV 8 of Agendix E re-AE! CON y' 4 j @tres extsency acticn levels 74%f OQc,Wh. d St &,ix'R -A t -@d V'MM M '~ lt i that are to be used for deter-3 mining when and W at type of ~ protective measures should be

• R "W W

,4 l considerad within and outside .MO 1 -,;lp u W A;d.~ d. the site boundary to protect ,q, w- .A, _a.p.%., g. NW@i health and safety. o gc.. f

,.L p

1 e. l Section 6.2.1.b of the Emer-: @w s ~ j eency Plan states that the jfQ h' Sic? ' 'T. 4 P t.. ~' M% i - ^' - District (licensee) Emergency - g-p).if,2 M W. Organi:ation ".... is respon-sible for recommending to the l:;hM M ih /.d'. counties that some form of pro-d .Of$yr # f-3,E, . $@$j ?$id

• C tectico action be consider &d."

4 -i ~ Sectiort 5.1.1.d of Emergency Q

5. '.

p@x 1,. Plan Procedure 164. AP 548, fga 5;(h'.

[y ;. -.;

identifies the making" of recom-

f. g 9 r

i t.h a ' "W N' 23tiorts as cne of the function-O.d t/, mendations'to affsite creant-F Y;, M e'" %J;? fQ dg/ l al respanstbilities assigrad to w

g n lly.

-^ g py , m,: '. the Energency Coordinator. ~ 7Q. j Contrary to the above:

yfpe 6 y, '

.;f4, - y% m.. ,w 4. There is r.a assurance that M 27, n i protective action recQwen. MIJ ) datto.% Will be M3d3 to Mb IA, ~4 4 J = A ~ b d 4 offsite SMrgercy n3n3ge- , Q~r a rert agencies due to the N' -? a reluctance of some shift 5,7.fE. R. if supervtsors functionino as %&u .a.. ' - s i. p Emerstncy Coordinators to . g 69 S f.[,% h y* distinrge Lheir responst-j w%. T g j' Q bilities for_ ruHN thne 7 h i neu w %ty s. g m

,,f:{0.fp,ry,. y.. ,1 - qa .M RANCHO SECO EME9GOsCY PREPAREONESS. CORRECTIVE' A 1 i 'k. ~ ~ ~ ' - (> g.' a 'C' 'I icd yf3 RESPONSE PURSUART Q)S CFR554:(s)(2)[Il)j/(.y : Md'tDr..;;r.. 6 y -r

• hl'U.1 g

z. ,,;w.wq:. w. q, ,. 3 wi q, 4 vn. p.cA ,1 p>- n5 - % c. . ;e. _,. .g .9 CF2 fefcrence ,a x f 3h['f' [,.hNProjetted Attu31 I^ ~n er W REG C654 anc A~ .._, flEntna_St3aurd_ FLHA Firdlas CorrectheI3Q*/iPridary Support W Complotten. '.Cocoletion Doctawntation: Action M W Authority 9 Authort h Date - Date Y /t[ Tgt ( xw,p n ) 10 CFR 50 71 10 CFR 50.47(t)(15) requires ' Schedule train-? Olstrict C' ~l 9/43-Observable ?-._ {. .g ;, c.. E that radiological'owreeney re-in; to be coor-S T.;j dc l exercise. 4p. E sponse training be provided to dinated with 5 P;r y those h% ouy be Called on to. SK!O EzergincyM J,c L; assist in an enersency.,. Plan revision.,in' 3.)M@@ n process.

G sfg,.a..

Sectico IV.F of Ap;0ndix E, c,.- 1 'D; M M. ", e t; ^1 10 CFR Part 50, requires ini * . :_ r .5" 9 tial training and periodic re. 'M A.s trainin2 of emergency person-s @j M,h/y I'.7; n01. f: jh. ]67%. g

f.,% Xdi

/y 4(7,~ Sectlen 5.4.2 of the licensec's ,;7' - f(*.e 7,. j ' f k ' (- w. Frergency Preparedness Proce-Jare, AP 580 IGin)n2. reesires training afunever there are 4,13 w'.-fy 6. significant revisions to the Q 2 Egd?N,$ c,.i V, 2,b., emersency plan or: procedures. .E ~ %l,. W T or equipment, or when changes 'E W f '.. m ' ;2 - b occur to em2rgency assienecnts. E: 9

,t....,/

y .Q.: Contrary to the above, the - ._'~Q rEJb% A c ye. {~3N r ? ~~S w. training of emergency personnel

1. ,,7 m, [

w s deficient in that: W P 7 s.. S- <v

a. As of the date of the in-

.f. :. .,.1 spection, training had not 1 3 7^2,5'n 3 been conducted on the re-N. K~ }%^I@$.4 ,)6 .!g:. visions to the faergency y 6# g9y.1 ~ Plan Procedures, dated-w 2Lr n January 5, 1983 and Febru- ? ~3 ary 3, 1931 which were in-9 $. a 'Mc

• 9%j,

s ardtately implancnted. h WN': N.T 2MJ e;E,W T'. ' These two revisions rodf-O '. e W E ~., f 'C fled 41 of the total of SS !? i'.f.' 'U' Energency Plan Procedures. ' m, .3 0 s b. Dae shift supervisor was .., s,,,.~,. y' ~;- w n r ? f.N'p 47, T3 .y& inadequately tratacd and t 4 Jn t ,n P ~ not kncwledgeable of the .i,# f~ G }c}. dulics and responsiblittles ~ of tha freccexy Ccerdi. fr c8 g.lo ~ v nator, a position he would '?. f 40 assime in an emernency. } e,4 f$ ',_{ l.g fge j o. t f'..g

y p

7g y; ..y w:- ,. n, k. A ~. t " s j

_-......... j..,...............,ok;, ,., e r.., ...v Crit Reference p . [E$hihYbD?,,. h ',Ygy.i \\. W ~ ,,d.;, Item' or NUREG 0654 - N2C "Y ?:' V s. W.G{ W '..g.p. AP Projected-l," Actual 'a 4Correctiveg'M Primry.JW uthoritw" ' #l$wport ?? Canpletion, fCogletion.,.Docwentattenf V). Pj,2.g}pe Standgrj, y g Findine Actlan* A Antharitw IQtte 7Date YIM ~ s Tree O@(c PE L F The c:ergency medical ocrtion TrainingaNd':.g iDistrict Actual re-Respowe of the exercise did not demo-drt11. d.'. R c.G.f-sponse 11/82 rexrt. Drill' strate an adequate ability to 9 M9%, ijty.1, l' 74 _Drt11 f/83 records aMjf 'g' handle injured and contaminated M6 - q~. c' W video tape. % a paticcis. The hospital person-NQ f

1. ' ' I *I d

nel were enthusiastic partict- '+ C - I' p3nts and perfoned with effec. i tive aM eff tcient pret,1 ration Mdj i s'. F ?? of the handling and treatetnt - ~ CM k$ ?? 1 1' N o ' [i[Z $[II. 'b ME .g.^ areas. The hospitsi plan ^ shodid have doctrer.tation sheet- -*. 7 J3 ^ ing regular revlen and update .M' of the plan. Hospital person-M 6 1 A nel did not have adcwate non-6,M N; %: i 7L Y" itoring eelpeent and training. ?.%,@3 hQ~ 7 A in the use of that cwiinent, iM~ The lleensee response was not +y adewate. There was a lack of M~' 'E~ hospital up-dates on the status of the incorning patients. The i,pb ? JE. J c technictan mas withaut monitor-i' ~^ Q c inn e e tpment and there was no ~ k. support to the hospital staff M regarding the radiological con- .g ~ i dition of the patients. c %+ ,,.W:,. :.d; ~ u '

p

1. d i

1. 17 N F There was a series of'traintas CompletoPaky0 ' District Cour.ttes 9/83 Revised draft and drills accorspitshed prior County Plans M of Part V cf~ [96 to the June 23. 1982 exercise. i -- g' County Flans s. Sir.cc that exercise.there has M 4 been no fonal training and 5;I" 9QP' l drill schedJle'develCDed. lhe kQ:. l' G draft plan section covering .O. .N 1 this standard is shown as 4 4, ' "To te done". j 0 . %. '$. c . *WN ms 13 0 F There was a series of training Schedule ofWnu ,. District ~ This has Provided and drills accompitsbcd prior trainips andig ~ ~ been submt-hercio. to (M Ju.1c 23.1932 exerciso. drills. ,1 N Led and for-ladJitirstal There h3s teen sarte linited $6 warded by copy) trainina done slece that time - pp. ~ .1~ State OfS to but there is no form 11 training FEMA. and drill schedule. The d-aft Erergency Worker: State / 01 strict 7/83 Draft lessen pl3d Section en this stafv!3rd Training Pra(., rA 395 Cowities t e. W.n % te r' nrlu f I f N.c n el- , af .,,.( Y gg 5-i' s' .. f",' .=

• lve t'?j*t:= +,- *.

.M. W~ ..w ce v =m~*

a p,.,, ? ., a s u s o n@,g, f, < C Q:Q.., q: M> ~g;M~ pglh m - . ~ ;Ma - ~ a..-- 1;g CFR Afere.nce ,iS..j y. D,:s+tw 4.."c t g @ 9 " i n E 3 df Q % U P oj ct d % @w vActuar e. w w e w, g... M.. ,. o - + gc d.y-ds . o. - o (C43 Plannira( or W fG 0654. kaC Y- . F ree T % Cerretti: Actsan - A'1 <WPrimary 4 -) SupportWR Comple ttog i ' T Caspletion : Doc'JeantatteeG itanhrd FD1A F1adine L W L mw:.aitv2 whnett,5 Bate 'nate Y/k 'Twee- ?- 1 i H e g; 7.y 14 J F TN plan review shDwed that a t w c.,;,. A cm s p g iostcal process had been devel-procedure $,d Ravise W .Anador. ?i../ -7/43 Revised Graft;.. %[%~ s.TW

Sacramento.

44 CantyPlans.)i oped for determining appropr1-: -MVM Jand San 4 c " l'kh P. f ~ r M9 J"' att protective'3ction' hut the - aj,$f&d IJeagutn # , / - W{M U E' reviews recommended the step by

M N Counties M h' 'Y step approach he consolidated

%s A9 -2 e j if possible and riade the re-M S@p i 3;< 4 sponsibtitty of cm or two in- - Mj de. W@&$w$s- ;., E - Ml' i;. P wA 14 n dividuals in the decisten snic - ~N. U'N.a 9Pi$' 1' u. - 3, 1ns group to present. ^The ex.: +yk:i '~ 3l ': ' E ~ crcis,e eeatuation shmed that m while the ECF participants des- %i hi ~ + { i or,$trated an ability to develop ' 46 M'M - / 'k,#"^ f . action, the procedores, brief - J$ 4 receracndations for protective - eMd) d ^~ m -@~'- M ~, j ins forins, and logic diagrara j n . @*4 y;-% i recuired by the plan were rtet ,., S: m uttil2ed to lasare that a prop-C, ~ er infor1stion flow was attain- $6 O d. I ed and all aspects of the pron-2.gfi p@g@yr_ Q. $ o' les were addressed. Q[ f.J, 7 4,

- /

. 2,4 G, _

9. y*Wm"[

w p* ~- t 2 v i 3 F The plan revleaishowed that the Supply 115% farf Aa& der. Olstrict 7/83 Revised Oraft list of handicapped persons g needing transportatien has not CountyPlansy;**(.5acramento.; . 's ~ us.'e sien County Plans. WT 'and San 2 T.. ' i been included. yl g cv e.. .s,

W Ceunties. -.

w;. < c. W, s n s sw-I Wse, 'W' %d[..., ', j,,,p g, I

• b.% :

^ ..qg bh'O Q

• qg-y.'

{

• ',,: f. s. *J...

(,* h y i ,. +,. t j y:ml, _n., -mg p f 'f%'4 Qly.li".* g-er ; i Q' ' ' f ' 5' \\ g i 5 NW/ ~.gi .. +. - .'G%.s;g,w&%.. ' } y C. ^ ?.. I h qq;a ,~@Q. er.&r - w, ..s i w-5 .a 4 1 t A,pll .r, t ep p ~'" u 1

• ...f.

%. 35, N 47 7 t, j A . %%. ~. , A .x c %. 1~- 4g 1 \\ Y p,4. ~. 4 - 9" ,h i ,$=.. ,= .' O') _y-i .m ' 97)h,;UA' 5 1 J ~ :,n ,, r.v. p)p.: , s M+ ...r ag. / .a M. .x;.. .. g. - -;. ..p

• j

). s ~ D. = $V W"'*SN'***'** r

.u. g,.. y n. .g<. ;,n g>29 m. O..u m.. g .l.. RANCM0 SECO DEEGENCY PREPAREDIESS CDeeKTIVE'ACTIDIPLAN Of _ ' M s. 4f' ) 4 M RESP 0kSE PilASIMaf T0;18 Cfts 50,54.;(s)(2)(til 2:A.::a@4;lf c . _ '... W...'m c ~' i rr.3. r , %.x : a ",h ..,; ?. %~ ~, y %,,g %. gtg b..a;g e,,q : V.' w % r;g}Y q yA:. m,;2 ' M P 'Actsal .0 %, m

w..

n . -, a,m, =y ;Q,. ws c, ,.. L,, ,,.9 ? .:16 ' n;?+: v; ~ y p ;,;r %'W h6" : m I F CrE teference J tm er kJRIG C654 W3C CorrectiveF". O j Primary support 5 ' - Co@letion Cwoletion DocuentationY. h_ Alana102.514Dd2tL.f.Dit Undin.e aett an - - '. antherity - antharitv2 D2tg .... Date - Y Lk Txat - i. ~ fr%

n.,

m1 ,C

l2 I

F The plan reticw sh b ed that due . Train Asador..innd' (: District.

Amador, q

3/12/83 San Traintns con'., d' to the few trained ennitors San Joacuin V'y 'L M "'# Sacrawento, Joawin tent. records.tA - natlable in the three cetn-Ccunty Plune. ~ '+ 'and San n 4/23/63 And attendance. ties, State or fedcral assit-Monitors. T e Joaquin G Am dar I1sts. tance weald have to tie provided WR ist Ccunties a 5/5/83 to supplement the county Leans. $1Nf Mh. r,) ;.c .M i^:.. .M Sacrarer.t0 ' '+F N 'V '. $ 'r;"$(' ^ Additicnal resources such as.

m. -Q ' yh g ccrrdicattoos episcent and' N

M-e- sops of local conitor poirls!, fM l- ~ were reccarended to support

.%5

A - s N,ir these teams. The exercise. yi Nfj 5 ,Mx San Joaquin n%yOf. showed that the radiclogicale, J, 3 ' :'- upconico W: i;.. decnnstrate ~- e nttor te m requested from the State by San Joawin County did Ccunty rad 105 W not have comunications equip-Mi A- { ~ exercise rent on the frequency used by - M. the Ccunty monitor teasts, J- -. &,f S ' ^ Forward Comrand. Post, and the I M. n t >., p~.%. ?,. b.n UDAC T.

y;;;;

N. .b g. ' n, m

13 I

F In Amado? County the co munica-Votingreceiver'6 f. District Mid-July, field test-- ticos systcra at the Forward installatlan n t % y-

f, _.

Md3 late Jaly. ~ Conrand Post (FCP) was not,ade-andactisitioni

TW & ' -

m. 3: &ccJisition quate for reliable comunica-of additionaliij 7'W^ t-2 schedule ttens to the EOC or the field etulpment J? monitor teams. 'd 4J e sM@,;;4.0 g;-; 7 p SQ 7'

.y;M.,3. :.a ;

y 'F W3.,. -::"~ t , ~. .y. Ys f{ c'.-,, .,n.,- s t ? 8 _.,f. a. .jy G,- '_ 7 ..m.,..,. ,.4%,, vs i a 4 ' q.y : A v 2 2 - 't ..f';ll l p;;.'. ' ~ ), . a.' L o - .Q. f 3 M p.]. -( , m... <[ f j., + . Q3 c

x

3. - ' e

Al.- k l f..:;

• N

&. V, ini*k '3 i',. .c . q.c m, A gygh,;zsg 2,;y j < p,, ;my - n. e, y, .y 3 - w. T.m J g 3.., s M RAhCEQ SECO DE9CENCY PEPAMMESS COEltECTIVE ACT1018 PLANId..,y2" .4l$f < f. 3 - r,'. ~V @ [fi ' K$P0nSE PURSUAkT TDi18 CFR 50.541s)(2)(tt)$,

• j5W w M:, ?, '. X',

,M7M w W ~.

7~

~ an.. ;7..c s.;. M ,y 3 .3. m; .. ~ ~ 8, .w Projected Actual /,.. V.q : 7 8y. n*! E ? ~;. n. -e n> CIR ' Reference W c Itm or NUSEG 0654 NRC PN Corrective h Primary t$upport:a.' Completion Cedroletion Docmentation a Actian MM AutMrity _ _ Authority > _.1Le _ J.L N Troe; p Dita N. ___. PJ Nn102.513011Cd. FDtA FiDdine . fl.t i

w. < a g5pgC

!., <.d? 10 11 F The exercisa des nstrated that Construction?,- R District A

9/81-(Con-tillt throu f i the phisteal arranscaent of the 3D i hW struction) opportvotty te c;"

te provided. - current taiporary EOF shoJ1d he JM DJ / revised to adequately accomo .W3M $N,f .f E< MO - ~ /gpp Q{9:;..' 3* w. [. ~$ r.t y date the required supporting ' e' e comunications er.uiprent, rupsv , f.g 4 rm ard status boards. This is ef-L'* W &}dt, 1 particular iro2rtarce as this $i EOF includes the functions of Qi? ""Q'JWfy County decision asknog, Ualfled M"y j> 1 90? + " u, ' ' I- .c 2 ).*! i' ' D)se Assessment and Energency O kans Center.1The Itcensee has stated that the lack of approv-

d$_f al frem NPC during the past

i. M '

year regarding the suitability

f. (fy.

~ .)p of their EOF location prevented ygg O'q-Y ~ ', c g '~ them from estabitshing and Wg equipping a permacnt E0F at an 77 5

.?

eariter date. Based on the

-{.

s. November 9,1982, approval from, MC S ^ ?- the ESC the licensee now pro.. Og7; y,2:.M. t jects that the construction af -..s@@Mh %,F u, the penunant ECF will te cors-d' ^ N i' ~.

• pleted by Septenber 1983, and j

the facility should be fully ,6 7 'i ,E Mg,." cperattocal by Novost>er 19&3. e .( wh7 j,;g ,. g% e 3 s 11 H F The exercise dersonstra'ted that Procedures,$$ - District: Counties during Training ugecning content and t!e Unifled Dose Assessrrent training,and? Center (U0AC).did rot receive drill. 7;Ji s;e exercise attendar.ce itsts. Draf t - prmpt, corplcte ar.d a4wate j % Q' inforrr.3 tion fron the licensee's N, procedures Technical Support Center.

1. ['Q

.;.s, perding PRC 3 Tf approval. z '9W + , ;-y '.Q 4 l t bkji- _ sf '[ Cia ., g _q D~;t l ,.f.,.u 4.gs, g...

• p-n

. z.. .D Q 4'.A w.

d e,.'

z ' t ?: i.yhy.: - c x 8 ~ n ( ;.4%

mm - ,y-T ' 4-3 us% a M

h. R.tNCHC SECO EMERCDIOY 79EPAnfD4ESS C099ECTIVE ACTIGH PLAll q; s.

4 f RESPQ185E PUaSUAllT T(Cf3 ($ 54;(S)(2)(11)@IvM,4 3 t,. - (;r ' %,k - Q~w :~I. ' - 1 M-WQ w-M ~ W:t:. ~ \\; m m '? o- , x+ ' O.N i[ Projected' Actt;al' N CFR Reference ' Corrective N".$ Primary A SupCort ' Co@!etica C01pletion Ocetsentation Itto cf EUf!EG 0654 MC

1,.

PL:,W(It itygh ard FDiA _ _ findiris Aclian s ' ~ Authnelty Authority" thlg _ ELig. ,.If.jt -T,x d 1 m .:gyJ? un ;. v w., ,a Devised draft i 8 G _f ' F The cruatles. State ard licens-- raestaife 6 1 2 District Amador,'1 % turtr.o > ' ^ < ce did not demonstrate a Lkrcly network and DC ' '3 Sacramente, upcomins c. Cot.nty PlansV ' _ exchance and coorcination of precedure 2 , _, p. and $an exercise' O utritt plan h Min h3 quin

prcelded, public infomatica during the exercise. Thistresulted fras

~ o ??? i JdfR Counties .@ Mit_p@s W A the coibinat'on of a la,ck orc - corwuitcations egalonent and ? fu

eS dy?,.;, Q"u;p ay,-

e i.. JYo specific operatin; procedures? GM'2 9# W A (509) far the Esergency Hed. ~ -ky ^ ^ ' M4 F Cer.ter. The development of e such a procedure is primarily ' MM O. the responsiblitty of the ' Sh WM - %'~ f Tfg%3 Q .d f ~ licensee in accordance with 4p l#;. S thatr arrar>2ceents with the Plannip2 Team.ig ) %q - 7.2n . j. i The draft plan # s itheceplete on Streninforse@. $01'strtet

faador, Pending

~

CODy of 5120 t 9 G F the subjects of providing an tion signs and: 1 J Sacramento. Parks Sept. Q

text, g

and San approvat and Distribution amual dissemiliatten of e,rtr-decals. PublicJ .loaquin constraints. list. gency inforantion to the public infomstion bro-Counties: brochure. Letter to and providing emerse:my infor-churcs (calendar) u. $ tate DES - 4/&3 Sean Crcmder raation to transient popula-JW q tions. <- In June of 1982 a, ydo Pt and Parks' ~ svbile information trochure J,,jd"' N@ Department,' Q' y.O covering the topic was distrib-s ,V 's y uted to the residents by the b :,.e - y;;.,9 Q. 11censee tut no actinn has been @.s h%' a C~ ry taken to provide rar tre tran, stent populations. Q jw 7 - r .:,9v sx y.

• ft u.'s w'

s l + t p e-q' e ,D q

• M

'd w ~ 'O '.] @ 4 d e> ~, ;f.. c

• }, '

,.a.* C

• f9 g".

V Y' 9 k. '*O '".q "m.-4 . e= Y i((N ^~.y ; -. k [{ ' ,a. ~., p ,4 7, pp.,s.{ N D' .,v,

_m. a 9 p y sr 3. y; s?' .y., RAllCWO SECO EMEAC411CY PREPAGEDRESS (DRIECTIVE ACT10ll.PLAll sM 7pL l g ~ ' w ; E.>;% .n ..?- [f :l. ; RESP 0aSE PURSunali 70i p}D{f((sH2 H .41 1R 505 e .e M l f ? l% N l 'j. (NflRs M' } ~. ~ ~ - JM Qf': k " " N J Projected Actiell 'M -G CFR 132ferenC0

en er mKEC 0654 MC r/

Corrective 4 W Primary Support? 'Corpletion Ccepletion Metrieritation'. .,. P.13001na Shnned fM rimfine utt an7' ' %whMtw' Autharity " Data gge_ XLp

• Tygt l

c C

.~

1. i q Mw QW.> r

<;P z., y

5 F

F The plan review showed that - fevelop comm,w f Disttietf Amador.. g g7/41, Reviseddraftf '. 2 @' M Sacramento... V' of County %g many parts of the plan' refer-plans ' ?"* 2 9 'andf5an. plans ring to ccrnruitcations had not Joaquin been done. E3 cts comty should 1 S,#}Q); s jy: fT y Counties. 3 _};45.s 4 devalco a connunicaticas plan. - p. .o 4 .g.., - < - - f 6 F F The n arcise darcastrated that 12nst211ation and . Olstrict ~during to-J Cbservatie y th2 data connunications equipV drill of fac -d coming drill and ~ a rent and factittles liiting the simile networir;9 W.. exercise system . $~ > diagrm. i 53C d"" Mg7' '4 h- * . EOF to t.he State EOC. County i 'I C E0C's.ud County Forward.' ~ Q T$ .M .m Conmard F0sts are not adequate"

?/r;g qm 4;

~ to prwide a prompt and accu-WNJ W ~ l rate loforration flow in accer-s; g .g dance wtth the county plans. m y,. w- + :. ;.. ;pna.. .M s ,y

, G:

"Q ? W f. T ~ ~ ' 7'.N.% . District. M same as item Observable r l7 F F The exercise demonstrated that Facsi:sile 1 i 6 drill and the procedures and contrartica-network. s tioes equistsent used for DistrictPlanY ~' ;7.4 : systen i change in emergency classifi- ' ff. .7 Q 2/1/83 diagram. issuins the notificatica of a EPM - 15 .p.e% Clstriet Plan ? gj". ~' i .;4 prortded t.' @$ k' ~ %"W s cation level from the site,to -~ . s 3@ .C 6~ the EOF and EOC?s should be t I troroved. The Gereral Emer-g- nency declaration was oot ' h;;.' 4 X passed fton the site lo the

• p.

,T! ? 7,., j p .M Y@E

1. NF a severrw a t representatives at

% i,: the EDF for t=enty minutes M7M Lten tre smoancecent was reads 34 .,P. /h 5 i after that level was declared. ZN 4 1 enly the staff in the briefing lgd "M Si m, rcon heard that arnounceret. ci7J5.%'n m, j w - ppp .g s d Q,. R 'l ~. y-gp e:4 s ~ w s n3 E,$. E / j y C <^ 1- ~ @d v,~ r,,. m } v. l .e s c m'9 e., ~ ;- b' .,y 1 ~ s ,2 5l. ; my.y ;c ~ n . a;

.w

• w..

k %. k'. Jg ,.Y#g-W 9 ,::gencp y p.a 'ag~ 0

M l~ L Q+Q &&.

b 6

2 q~ \\ ~ [,..,,M. ",f. e RAhCMD SECO EK 2GEhCY PilEPA unarte CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN'I+- h ,, RESP 0mSE PutSUANT TO:.le-Q e ec,(s)(2)(ti) '; M E ', 50.54 e ' 9f' " .y ,0 m w Wre us. A. ' , crn,; a.- c - Um-93. wh%w:f -- / N- + ui ~.. % C.% '. '. ".IZ E i .wg%M,~Frojected Actual 4 S, .4 - ~ - 1y.. ;ww# ' c , fM.pg ~.13 CFE Reference w er4 s w.- 5 1..,o Itm er FAEG C654 BC ^ Corrective t.N.' Prtrary ' Supporti -.Corpletion Ccroletion Co:trentation it._fQ: ming.SL3aIard. FEM Firdina Acit an 19

• hherity -

M harity: M Lg. D:ite Y / II - Teet lQ

p...

~ Q. [, : f* N. I A F The draf t plar[althovah n:t - SMIO Eracrgency j 4 strict Di '2/1/d1 District Plan,1 + coreleted for sone elenents Plan Revistan;15: 6%e l' ' ?7 Mf: under this standard shcw no JJ 3" j W M mjar deficiencies in this M@.gj' ~ y area. The esercise showed that U4 4 m-N

k. 4+

Setal had asstgned too saray W y/ 1: - I . o 2 -W Q .. Y; critical Ef>T functions to a: J f' served as the SMJD liaison to' 94n N%@ / sin 21e person."That person Q E C~:(.T R.Q the counties. the EDF Admints-456. trative Support Manager, the d'.3 - f ?T'. ' *Q~ ~ F,n technical assistant to the SetlO 5;7 Ny.y; ild Emergency Ha. nager, liaisort to ',A - itPC. liaison to the U3AC and w' 'C, liaison to the State. 20 sin 21e persea can accesipitsh that cany tasks effectively. $.0 5 1 r

pigs.. & n y

Q 'Y a c 2 E F The plan revic22nd the exer-Cot.nty Plans W..

Amador, District 7/83 RJylSed draft cise both confimed that tM Rcvision 9t-Eacramento.

cf Ceuity existipo text and formt of the m and San F13r.s preeritten ERS public instruc- . M, Joaquin i

w. f.hi Cointies : q

.a tions are not adequate. wks 4 V .Q':: -s 3 E F The exercise evaluation showed SWD Emergency' 'Ststrict. 2/1/83 Training '~ that during the activatlan of Plan Revision 15 M records. h; y j, the EOF staff there m s a delay M[.. 'y(: .,s g e at the SMUD switchboard because W ' er. M' the cperator's did rot have ., l,ffd d 'c 3deqJate instrUClicoS. + %w el, s lN ?g*h, s e a s. 4 E F The stren based warning system ' Na probleras have' District [' . 3.. 8/13 Ncdtftcation-hos teen installed and is oper-occurred in thei ^ schedule and , attonal in accord Mth the pastsixmonths.} 3 descriptica, plar.s. A tralfunctlar has de-hwever, en-h selc>ed in the sirt.ns resulting coter/ decoder W L in the spantaneous sounding cf erAarcr.sient' iSh - S' IC.. individtal strens for no appar-tetos dor:e by t, cat reawn. Repeated false theDistrict.I'~. ', ^ alarss mill r:egate the value of R. the strens as an effective !p public marning device.

m;

_A. 14 A a :.

• yf p y -

o c Qg N g~ 4 .-}}