Text

Suppl to Annual Environ Operating Rept:Radiological for 1982. W/830613 Ltr
	ML20024A397
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	06/07/1983
From:	Mckee P, Reuschaefer E, Westafer G; FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:	James O'Reilly; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
	3F-0683-03, 3F-683-3, NUDOCS 8306170221
	Download: ML20024A397 (108)
	v • d • e

,

I Florida P9?e!

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 1982 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT RADIOLOGICAL Supplement gaa'n85'a88Tgg

. . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - #J

)

l l

l FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 1982 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT RADIOLOGICAL APPROVED BY: [d/7/E.9/f /(, EN#

Nuclear Plant Manager DATE: h,, e 7, / 9 f3 APPROVED BY: {[$ uk/!), /.// /L 2'f

~

Manager, Sife Ndclear Services DATE: de,u ~7,

/993 V

_ _ . . . . . . . .U

af e .,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction 1 List of Sampling Stations 3 Site and Area Maps 5 Sample Station Locations 7 II. Milk and Green Leafy Vegetable Census 9 Ill. Media Other Than External Radiation 10 Air Inhalation Pathway 11 Precipitation Pathway 19 Sea Water Pathway 22 River Water Pathway 28 Ground Water Pathway 31 Potable Water Pathway 34 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway 38 Seafood Chain Pathway (Marine Plants) 45 Ingestion Pathways Crab 50 Carnivous Fish 55 Herbivorous Fish 60 Oysters 65 Shrimp 69 Milk 73 Animal 77 Food Crops (Citrus) 81 Food Crops (Watermelon) 83 Food Chain Pathways Grasses 85 Soll 89 Meat 90 Poultry 92 Eggs 94 Green Leafy Vegetables 96 IV. Exte nal Radiation 101

-i-

I. INTRODUCTION The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program provides information which can be used in assessing the type and quantity of radiation exposure in unrestricted areas resulting from plant operation. The Program is conducted via a contract with the University of Florida, Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Gainesville, Florida and a grant to the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Orlando, Florida. The parts of the Program for which each are responsible are listed in Table I-1. Figure I-l depicts the relationships of the plant effluents to the food chains and the associated pathway links that are monitored in the surveillance program. Figures I-2 and I-3 provide maps of the offsite and onsite environmental sampling sites surrounding Crystal River Unit 3.

Table I-2 provides sample station locations by distance and direction from the plant.

In essence, the Program provides a continuation of the preoperation program so that any increases of radioactivity in the environment can be detected. No pathway has shown any confirmed increases of radioactivity in the environment due to plant operation during this report period.

Each pathway is addressed in the report, as appropriate, including data summaries, graphical presentations, and narrative. This report is a supplement to the Annual Report submitted in March of this year. The initial report did not contain data summaries and comparisons due to computer code problems at the University of Florida.

l

. . ._ . . _ . .._.J

l tsoute attr asts AIAGORWE RELtasE S l

l mLT(44AL $(A y&T(Rh AIE I R A DI ATIOR j lO

, u SE0iedEMTS FORAGE CAUSTACEA W FISM T MILE MAN CRITICAL Pa?nways LfGWlO RELEA$f3 ABRSQRNE R(LE ASES M% g sCA WATEm ]

lAiRf g h

( 4 1 d

'If h d 4r 4 4h d

' sceiutars -e ^lf,^,',',C w ,' [^,' ",

soil r roRast cfef, eacciairation -p j ,"j ,E,",",',';,e--

- , _a hsr 3r GRCuM3

", WATER

[ MIL K l 4

roTAstr ,g g , ~

WAf(R waygg ir 3/ 1r ar sr TERRESTRIAL WIL Q LlF C 1r sr 3r sr sr ,e s ,

hr l M A= _l oracR monito Rio ear

ways Figure I-1 Environmental Medic and Exposure Pcth wa y s

TABLE I-l Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RESPONSIBILITY PATHWAY SAMPLE STATIONS University Air Submersion C04, C14H*, C14M*, C14G*,

C40, C41, C43, C46 State Air Submersion C07,C09,C18,C26 University Air Inhalation C41*

State Air Inhalation C04, C07, C18, C26, C40, C46 State Precipitation C04, C26, C40 University Sea Water C01, C09, C13, Cl4H, C14M, C14G*

State River Water CIS State Ground Water C40 Unive.sity Potable Water C07,C10,C18 Unive sity Shoreline External C01, C09, C14H*, C14M*, C14G*

Sediment University Seafood Chain C29,C30 University Ingestion Crab C29*, C30 University Ingestion Fish C29*, C30 (Carnivorous)

University Ingestion Fish C29*, C30 (Herbivorous)

University Ingestion Oysters C29,C30 University Ingestion Shrimp C27 University Ingestion Milk C47,C49*

l University Inge: tion Animals C45 l

( University Food Chain (Grasses) C05, C40, C41 State Ingestion Food C19 Crops (Citrus)

._I

TABLE I-l (Continued)

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RESPONSIBILITY PATHWAY SAMPLE STATIONS State Ingestion Food C04 Crops (Watermelon)

University Food Chain (Soil) C04, C07, C18, C26, C40, C41, C46 State Meat C50 State Poultry C51 State Eggs C51 University Food Chain C47,C48*

(Green Leafy Vegetables)

Critical Pathway Sample Stations

-4 i

/

C47 in Gainesville 52 Ni NNE 15 miles 9 ,

. ----- ..h,,i (

, '\.,

' j

.. - -- ... A

/ ,,ct,s tocn 40 '. u _], )

DUNNELLON mi vaNnt[ Tows \ UNNtttON

, ,Cl 8 C04 C19 .

't N4 FLORIDA power CORP '*

5 milesy gg toCk&OAu ,

, e%

PLANT [M .

HotDER %,-

8' c4dl)g5 C10e

,j, !

, \

n,yg, ,.

- e nt;iv unt

.c09 07 , %,tts TsAt A 2Poon ,

CJ:' Or utwCo % ,h, l %

0 . .

N ,- t

' (4--4 .- LECANTO <

CRYSTAL ,. -

/

H O M O S ASS A' .. 'ase f cI CIT R U S s- p dc- i

'gl l

(49i) i h JAT _ N n ~

xN s

l

, -/

I 4 -/ / ~7 OFF SITE OPER ATIONAL R ADIOLOGICAL PROGR Au SAMPLING SITES CPYST AL RIVER UN!T :-

Figure I-2

///,j j.

\\

A N

. - - \ /

\ ~

m :

~,~

s ~

t y

f ,

' , 1;

. dk's-2.

((x~ ,

/. -

n.

g ,-

'd .

;, N

~

s

.\

f

p%-

f~

c$ 4 e C

\g&j, e.

p y

y Q

f sm gi g

~

C t 4

' C1 s. ,

y 4 ,%~.

%s 2 rs u

t y

%C __ -

/

sb c

~

k n

- .. j n

g

?

2 4 ~/ ' [~

~

CYc ~ / i ib C 1

, 3 J,.^#

l h

s~

l * ** -

C' Nb' //

^

t i %wfg <

e

,~

w osMhb,Of~rmk?9,e0,^ , . , .,

? Lq4,4ooMkt mNf czO ".f, .

.;e

-r. '

qn<M4brN - < q cy1~ ,. -

n eo N M= a ~<~ a".

f -

r g

uf

/ /

/ !! ,' i I l' 'I I )/

w

l s

TABLE I-2 Operational Sample Station Locations :

l Station '

Distance From Distance From Number Location Plant (miles) Plant C01' Levy County Park ' 4.9 NW West End State Road 40 C04 State Park Old Dam on 6.3' ENE River near road intersection C05 Entrance to Hollinswood Ranch ' -

3.8- ENE C07 Crystal River Public Water 7.5 ESE Plant' 1

, C09 , Citrus Country Park 3.2 S a West End State Road 44 '

~

( C10 Indian Waters Public ,' . 5.9 ESE

~

Water Supply; i4 ,

Mouth of Intake Canal C13 3.4 WSW

' Cl4H Head of Discharge Canal 0.1 NW 1'

s' ~ i

- C14M Midway out Discharge Canal 1- 1.5 W Cl4G Gulf of Mevico end of 2.8 W

\

Discharge Canal V -

1 y i i CIS g Withlfcoochee River , ,_

' 5.0 'E N N Yankeetown Dock

~

s t ' ,

's t s s -

e. X: 4t Isaac Walton Lodgs '; s ._ i . , ' s,

[' ;x h ~ ," ' N

':\ -

/' C m\ \]

gg tv Yankee' ton City Wet!

/d 5.2

. . N l " C19 -

NW Corner $$ ate Road I/ Y8.5 / "cENE

re ' < -[,

~ . \' \l ' 488 and State'; Road 49)

" \ 'i _ ,

\ 2 .

N.

l

,j , \\s L I-C26 FPC Substations on State Roa'd , ' ' ( '\6.6 IT

' i\ iDiE "

'{'

491 between' Beverly Hills and p ,1 ? i s Holder , i\ , t 'l' s

I i

' >' _7 ' *

/' .

k kws

\. ,%

.k 6

i, s . . . 'O i '

ss y.

'\

1

'y ,

i l

TABLE I-2 I i

Operational Sample Station Locations (Cont'd)

Station Distance From Distance From Number f Location Plant (miles) Plant s, '

\

C27 Ralston Purina Research f 0.6 WNW Facliity between Intake ' ,'

and DischarSe Canals C29 Discharge Area 2.0 W C30(a) Intake Area 3.6 WSW C40 On site near N.E. Boundary 3.5 E at excavated pond and pump station C41 Onsite meteorological 0.4 SSW C43 S.E. corner Hollinwood ,

4.7 -

ESE C45 Between C40 and C46 ( ,

NA '

,NA C46 North Pump Station O.4 : 'N' C47 Univ. of Fla., Gainessilld 52.0 NNE C48 To be determined from A'rdual' Vegetable Garden Census ,

C49 To be determined from Semiannual '!

Milk Animal Census i

I (a) This station is considered as background station for marine sampling. '

. +

\

J, .

II. MILK AND GREEN LEAFY VEGETAE.LES CENSUS Environmenta! Technical Specificatien 3.2.1 requires a census of animals producing milk for human consumptica to be c6ndected semiannually. If this census fails to locate any such animals, a. census 'of gardens producing fresh leafy vegetables for human consumption is required annually.

The garden census, required as a result of a lack of findings on the milk animal census, was completed on June 16,21, and 28,1982. Eight (8) garden sites within 5 miles of the plant were located and an evaluation as to the critical station is being conducted.

/ 1-A semiannual milk cow .$urvey was completed on June 16,21, and 28,1982 with no milk animais found within 5 miles of the site.

)

A semiannual milk cow census was completed on December 30,1982. Milk animals were located within 5 miles of the plant site in this census, but no milk was immediately available from the animals. One (1) cow was identified east-northeast of the plant at approximately 4.5 miles and another cow in the same direction at approximately 5 miles. Both animals were dry at the time of the census, but should

,- be able to provide milk the second quarter of 1983.

j k.

I &

4

,'a'

k

\i 1

+

t O

t e

A i

,N * ,

t

III. MEDIA OTHER THAN EXTERNAL RADIATION This category includes all samples of the food chain pathway other than External Radiation as depicted in Figure I-1. The samples are collected and analyzed in accordance with Crystal River Unit 3, Environmental Technical Specifications, Section 3.2.2. Each pathway analyzed is presented in this section by data summaries, data comparisons, and plots in order to document in easily usable form the effects of effluent releases from Crptal River Unit 3 on the surrounding environment.

Each Pathway summary contains a brief narrative, two tables, and, as appropriate, a trend plot of the nucildes of interest. The first table provides a summary of each pathway data formated as required by Section 5.6.1.A, of Environmental Technical Specifications. The second table provides a comparison of required reporting levels to the analytical data as required by Section 5.6.1.c(2) for critical pathway samples as well as general pathway samples. The nuclide trends were developed from the means of all locations for each parameter analyzed from 1977 to 1982. The limits for comparison of highest single value for each pathway were calculated as described in the tables. Where no preoperational data were available, a control station was used and where no control station existed, preoperation data were used for the limits.

AIR INHALATION PATHWAY The Air Inhalation Pathway is one of two pathways split between the University and the State. In addition to the assigned stations, the University operates a station at C47 (Gainesville, Fla.).

Weekly Gross Beta Analysis One (1) weekly gross beta sample was not collected and analyzed and the following discrepancies noted:

-C47 for the week of January 29,1982 - filter lost between sampler and laboratory.

-C47 first quarter, second week sample exceeded the LLD limit due to sampler failure resulting in too small of an air volume.

There are no critical stations for this type of analysis.

The operational concentrations are similar to the preoperational concentrations and consistent with previous operational years' concentrations.

Weekly I-131 Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. Station C41 is the critical station for this type of analysis and no samples had activity greater than 10 times the control station's 95 percentile values. There is no pre-operational data.

The following discrepancies were noted:

-C47 first quarter, second week sample exceeded the LLD limit due to sampler failure resulting in too smhl! of an air volume.

-C41 first quarter, second week sample LLD exceeded the limit due to excessive time before decay back calculation was performed causing the LLD to be slightly above acceptable limits.

Quarterly Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations for this type of 1 analysis.

The concentrations of nuclides by gamma analysis during 1982 were generally less than the preoperational concentrations and consistent with all previous operational years' concentrations.

Quarterly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis All samples were collected. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

The following discrepancy was noted:

-C41 sample was not put in the lab in a timely manner. Data is unavailable but sample will be analyzed.

There are no preoperational data and all operational concentrations are consistent with historical operational data.

-.1 1 -

TABLE III-l ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/-12/31/82 PATHWAY

TYPE

NO.

LLD

A

H10 HEST MEAN

- - - - LL

LOCATIONS ****************************** LOCATION

CONTROL LOCATION *NR

t

AIR INHALATION

IDDINE

t

416* 0.035t0.031( 2/ 416)*C47 *0.043t 1/ 52)*0.043( 1/ 364)* 2

* * (0.020-0.043)* * (0.043-0.043)* (0.043-0.043)*

FATHWAY

TYPE

HO.

LLD *

HIGHEST MEAN

- - - - ALLLOCATIONS ******************************* LOCATION

CONTROL *NRR LOCATION

- - - - S**********************

AIR INHALATION

GROSS B *

416* 0.013*0 019( 396/ 415)*C07 *0.023( 52/ 52)*0 020( 346/ 363)* 1

* (0.002-0.059)* * (0.011-0.039)* (0 002-0 059)*

I PATHWAY

TYPE 8 NO.

LLD

ALL LOCATIONS

HIGHEST HEAN LOCATION

CONTROL LOCATION *NRR I *****************?t************************************************************************************

AIR INHALATION * * * * * * *

(PCI/M3)

SR 89/90 * * * * * *

ANALYSIS 32 * * * * *

0

SR-90 30.0008* 7.97E-05( 2/ 31)*C41

9.21E-05( 1/ 3)* 6.7 E-05 ( 1/ 28)*

*

6.7E 9.2E-05*

9.2E 9 2E-058 6.7E 6.7E-05*

SR-89 30 0016* 2.53E-04( 1/ 31)*C41

2 53E-04( 1/ 3)* ND ( 0/ 29)*

*

2 5E 2.5E-04*

2.5E 2 5E-04f

NO-ND

TABLE III-l (Cont'd)

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORINO PR00 RAM SUMHARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-307 CITRUS COUNTYe FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/82-12/31/82 PATHWAY

TYPE 8 NO.

LLD

ALL LOCATIONS

HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION

CONTROL LOCATION *NRA

- - - - t*********************

AIR PART. * * * * * * *

(PCI/M3) .* GAMMA * * * * *

AIR INHALATION

ANALYSIS 32 * * * * *

0

CE-144

0 050* 0 030( 1/ 32)*C41

0 030( 1/ 4)* <LLD ( 0/ 28)*

* * ( 0.030- 0 030)* * ( 0.030- 0.030)* *

BA-140

0.010% ND( 0/ 32)* * * *

TH-232

0.018* <LLD( 0/ 32)* * * *

l-131

0.010* ND( 0/ 32)* * *

1 * * * * * *

g * * * * * *

b> 1 RA-226

0.034* 0 010( 2/ 32)*C41

0 010( 1/ 4)* 0.010( 1/ 28)*

g i * * ( 0.010- 0.010)* * ( 0.010- 0.010)* ( 0.010- 0.010)*

RU-106

0.047* ND( 0/ 32)* * * *

CS-137

0.010* <LLDC 0/ 32)* * *

1 ZR-95

0.010* ND( 0/ 32)* * * *

MN-54

0.010* ND( 0/ 32)* * * *

2N-65

0.020* ND( 0/ 32)* * * *

K-40

0.091* 0.017( 3/ 32)*C41

0.017( 3/ 4)* HD ( 0/ 28)*

* * ( 0.010- 0 030)* * ( 0.010- 0 030)*

i

TABLE 10-2 AIR INHALATION Sampling No.of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD le Value Location (pel/m3) (pci/m3) Sing (pci /m3) (pci/m3)

I-131** all < LLD 416 0.035 ---- ----

C41 * * ---

1 0.012 0.020 0.040 Preop C47 --

1 0.038 0.043 0.040 preop Grcss Beta all 0.019 416 0.013 -- ----

CA1** 1 0.02 0.028 1.20 preop C40 1 0.01 0.059 1.20 preop Sr 89 all <LLD 32 0.0016 <LLD C41** --

1 0.002 < LLD Sr 90 all < LLD 32 0.0008 <LLD C41** --- 1 0.001 < LLD

Dsfined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational pr: gram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational prcgram or operating station used to calculate limit.

OoCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclide.

l l

l 1 1

TABLE III-2 (Continued)

AIR INHALATION Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/m3) (pcl/m3) (pci/m3) (pci/m3)

G mma Analysis Rs 226 all <LLD 32 0.034 --- ---

C41** --- 1 0.005 0.01 2.41/ preop C47 -- 1 0.005 0.01 2.41/ preop Th 232 all <LLD 32 0.018 <LLD ----

C41** 4 0.005 <LLD 0.08/ preop I131** all <LLD 32 0.01 <LLD --

C41** - - - 4 0.005 <LLD 0.04/ preop Bm 140 all <LLD 32 0.01 < LLD --

41** 4 0.01 <LLD 0.16/ preop Ru 106 all <LLD 32 0.047 < LLD --

C41** -- 4 0.01 <LLD 2.16/ preop Cs 137 all <LLD 32 0.01 <LLD C41** --- 4 0.005 < LLD 0.13/ preop cD; fined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit, ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclide.

TABLE ID-2 (Continued)

AIR INHALATION Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Par; meter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pcl/m3) (pci/m3) (pci/m3) (pci/m3)

Grmma Analysis Zr 95 all < LLD 32 0.01 < LLD C41 *

4 0.005 < LLD 0.43/ preop Mn54 all < LLD 32 0.01 < LLD C41** 4 0.005 < LLD 0.10/ preop Zn 65 all < LLD 32 0.02 < LLD C41** --

4 0.005 < LLD 0.10/ preop K 40 all 0.017 32 0.091 0.01 C41** 3 0.005 0.01 1.10/ preop

Dcfined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational pr: gram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational prcgram or operating station used to calculate limit.

)

ooCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

y E.

FIGURE IIId AIR INHALATION NUCLIDE TRENDS Il 10 1 e

r D I-13l l M ar4 Q. E 10 a

4

@ Gron Beta.

) ? _. .

-- - - - - . . _ . . . - . --, . ~ . . . - . .

~ '

10-3

~~

e

- ^

3,.g q

. _ _ <; ; g ._

l{

~

~ ~~

y g g,.QC

L A A A A

'5977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

e.

FIGURE III-2 AIR 1h"dALATION NUCLIDE TRENDS 10 1 o

( Ru,4 A. AJ 4 Cs tyy 10-2 I , d

- .xJ2 t

t

=

g

~

}, - .

, egag x ,.v. c. ,,,

't f 10 8 l\ . .

_m-.

-mum e4 10-"

~

1982

~

^1977 1978 1979 1980 19'81 PRECIPITATION PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze precipitation samples. There are no additional stations for the pathway.

Monthly Gamma Analysis All monthly samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

The 1982 operational activities of the nuclides determined by gamma analysis were non-detectable as were the preoperational and all operational activities to date.

Monthly Tritium Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

All of the 1982 operational activity data for tritium were less than the LLD's.

No trend plots of the precipitation pathway are provided due to the lack of variation in the data. Since 1977, all of the monthly gamma analyses and tritium analyses have been less than the LLD.

i L

TABLE III-3 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-303 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/03-12/31/82 PATHWAY A TYPE 3 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A PRCCIPITATION A A A A A A A (PCI/L) A GAMMA A A A A A A A ANALYSIS 36 A A A A s A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A PA-140 A 17.0A ND ( 0/ 36)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A I-131 A 17.0A ND ( 0/ 36)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CS-134 A 17.0A ND ( 0/ 36)A A A A A A A A A A A I

A A' A A A A A N A A A A A A O A A CS-137 A 17.0A ND ( 0/ 36)A A A A I A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CO-58 A 17.0A NC ( 0/ 36)A A A A

, A A A A A A A A A A A A. A A A A A A A A A A HH-54 A 15.0A HD ( 0/ 36)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A ZH-65 A 30.0A ND ( 0/ 36)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CD-60 A 17.0A ND ( 0/ 36)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A PATHWAY A TYPE & NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST NEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A PRECIPITATION A .

A A A A A A (PCI/L) A TR IT IUM A A A A A A A IR A ANALYSIS 36 A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A H-3 A 200.0A (LLD( 0/ 36)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

TABLE 15-4 PRECIPITATION Sampling No.- of- .. Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value -Location (pcl/l) (pci/l) (pcl/1) (pci/l)

G mma Analysis I131 all <LLD 36 17 <LLD 170/ preop B2140 all <LLD 36 17 <LLD 170/ preop Cs 137 all <LLD 36 17 <LLD 170/ preop Cs 134 all <LLD 36 17 <LLD 170/ preop Co58 all <LLD 36 17 <LLD 170/ preop Mn54 all <LLD 36 15 <LLD 150/ preop Zn 65 all <LLD 36 15 <LLD 300/ preop Co 60 all <LLD 36 15 <LLD 170/ preop Tritium all <LLD 36 200 <LLD 2000/ preop

Dsfined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational pregram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational pregram or operating station used to calculate limit.

l SEAWATER PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze seawater samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Monthly Gamma Analysis The monthly samples were collected and analyzed with the exception of the following:

-C01 May sample analysis was considered invalid due to high voltage failure and lack of K-40 results.

Sample Station C14G is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the preoperation or centrol station values.

The concentrations of nuclides by gamma analysis during 1982 were consistent with preoperational and operational concentrations for previous years.

Quarterly Tritium Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

The concentrations observed in 1982.were consistent with preoperational and previous operational concentrations.

Quarterly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The First Quarter sample at station C01 was not collected and analyzed. All other samples were collected and analyzed. Sr-89/90 are not critical nuclides in this pathway. There are no preoperational data. The 1982 Sr-89/90 concentrations are consistent with those of previous operational years.

The following discrepancy was noted:

-C01 first quarter sample lost during radiochemical procedures. First quarter gamma results indicated only naturally occurring radionuclides. C01 is a control station.

l

. .~. - _

TABLE III-5 ENVIRONMENTAL REDIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMM22Y' CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCMET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/82-12/31/82.

PATHWAY A TYPK 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR 4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A.

A A A A A A SEA WATER A A A A A (PCI/KG) A GAMMA A A A 1 A ANALYSIS 72 A A A A A A

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 15.6A 17.7( 1/ 71)AC13 A 17.7( 1/ 12)A 17.7( 1/ 59)A A A A ( 17.7- 17.7)A A ( 17.7- 17.7)A ( 17.7- 17.7)A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A

A TH-232 A 9.7A 15.4( 12/ 71)AC13 A 17.4( 2/ 12)A 15.7( 9/ 59)A A A A ( 10.5- 21.0)A A ( 13.8- 21.0)A ( 12.2- 21.0)A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A

A I-131 A 5.0A 14.7( 2/ 71)AC14MA 14.7( 2/ 12)A 14.7( 2/ 59)A A A A ( 7.8- 21.6)A A ( 7.8- 21.4)A ( 7.8- 21.6)A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A.

I A RA-226 A 12 1A 33.4( 64/ 71)AC14HA 38.3( 10/ 12)A 33.5( .53/ 59)A N A A A ( 8.6- 76.5)A A ( 19.8- 64.5)A ( 8.6- 76.5)A A A A A A A A.

A A A ,A I A A A A CS-134 A 5.1A 11.0( 3/ 71)AC14GA 21.4( 1/ 12)A 5.8C 2/*.59)A A A A ( 5.0- 21.4)A A ( 21.4- 21.4)A ( 5.0- 6.5)A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A A RU-106 A 40.2A 69.6( 1/ 71)AC13 A 69.6( 1/ 12)A 69.6( 1/ 59)A A A A ( 69.6- 69.6)A A ( 69.6- 69.6)A ( 69.6- 69.6)A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 5.3A 7.0( 5/ 71)AC14GA 7.9( 2/. 12)A 6.3( 3/ 59)A A A A ( 4.4- 10.2)A A ( 5.6- 10.2)A ( 4.4- 7.9)A A A A A A A

' A A A A A A A A

A ZR-95 A 8.3A 7.8( 1/ 71)AC09 A 7.8( 1/ 12)A 7.8( .1/ 59)A A A A ( 7.8- 7.8)A A ( 7.8- 7.8)A ( 7.8- 7.8)A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A

A MN-54 A 4.5A NDC 0/ 71)A A A A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A

A ZN-65 A 10.4A ND( 0/ 71)A A A A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A A A A A . A A A A K-40 A 86.5A 253.9( 56/ 71)AC14MA 300.0( 10/ 12)A 248.6( 47/ 59)A A A A ( 89.0- 406.83A A ( 246.4- 404.8)A ( 89.0- 406.8)A 4 4 4 A A A A

TABLE III-5 (Cont'd)

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPOPTING PERIOD 01/01/81-12/31/8f PATHWAY A TYPE & NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CGNTROL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A SEA WATER A A A A A A A (PCI/KG) A TRITIUM A A A A A A A ANALYSIS 24 A A A .A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A H-3 A 423.0A 743.7( 7/ 24)AC14HA 1200.0( 1/ 4)A 830.6( 5/ 20)A A A A ( 304.0-1200.0)A A (1208.0-1200.0)A ( 384.0-1208.0)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A PATHWAY

TfrE 3 NO.

LLD

ALL LOCATIONS

HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION 9 CONIROL LtfCATION *NRR SEA WATER * * * * * *

I (PCI/KG)

SR 89/90 * * * * *

N

ANALYSIS 24 * * * * *

O g * * * * * * *

3R-90 *0.2979* 1.04E+00( 13/ 23)*C13

1.64E+00( 3/ 4)* 3.72E-01( 11/ 19)*

* * ( 0.170- 3.670)* * ( 0 573- 3.470)* ( 0.341- 3.470)*

t * * * * * *

GR-89 *0.6568* 1 07E+00( 6/ 23)*C140* 1.12E+00( 2/ 4)* 2.33E-01( 4/ 19)*

* * ( 0.933- 1 250)*

C 0.984- 1 250)* C 0.933- 1.220)*

O 4

6

TABLE III-6 SEA WATER Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gemma Analysis Rn 226 all 33.4 72 12.1 -- ---

C14G** ---

1 18.2 69.7 593/C13 C14M 1 14.4 76.5 593/C13 Th 232 all 15.4 72 9.7 -- --

C14G** 1 10.8 20.7 70/ preop C13 ---

1 12.8 21.0 70/ preop I131** all 14.7 72 5.0 C14G** ---

11 17 <LLD 170/ preop C14M ---

1 2.6 21.6 170/ preop Bn 140 all 17.7 72 15.6 C14G** ---

11 17 <LLD 110/ preop C01 1 10.5 17.7 110/ preop Ru 106 all 69.6 72 40.2 C14G** --

11 120 <LLD 1200/ preop C13 --

1 44.4 69.6 1200/ preop Cs 137*

all 7.0 72 5.3 C14G** 1 4.8 10.2 100/ preop C14M 1 5.3 7.91 100/ preop Zr 95 all < LLD 72 8.3 --

C14G** 11 20 < LLD 157/C13 C09 1 6.4 7.8 157/613 CDIfined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational l prcgram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

TABLE III-6 SEA WATER Sampling No.of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

G mma Analysis (Con't)

Cs 134 *

all 11.0 72 5.1 ---

C14G * * ---

1 5.0 21.38 97/C13 C09 1 4.3 6.5 97/C13 Mn54 all <LLD 72 4.5 --- - - -

Cl4G** --

11 20 <LLD 200/ preop Zn 65 all <LLD 72 10.4 --

C14G** 11 20 <LLD 200/ preop K 40 all 253.9 72 86.5 -- ---

C14G** ---

1 61 329 4290/Cl3 C14M 1 168 406 4290/C13 Tritium all 744 24 422 C14G** ---

1 567 594 870/ preop C14H 1 307 1208 870/ preop Sr 89 all 1.07 24 0.66 ---

C14G** --

1 0.37 1.25 12.6/Cl3 C09 -- 1 0.36 1.22 12.6/Cl3 Sr 90 all 1.04 24 0.30 --

Cl4G** 1 0.24 0.25 44.4/Cl3 Cl3 --

1 0.26 3.67 44.4/Cl3 l

l OD ; fined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational

pregram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's

! influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational pregram or operating station used to calculate limit.

l l OCCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

l l

l a.

FIGURE III-3 SEAWATER NUCLIDE TRENDS

.f , ;

10 2 As 106 k

10 1

+ 4'

m

& Y0 1

n

V2 ,

x,::.: .

10 0 _c h

n o

[

, , . Sr -89 + Sr 90 l _

l 10-1

{

~1577 1978 1979 1980 1981 19'82 RIVER WATER PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze river water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Quarterly Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

Neither preoperational nor operational samples have had detectable activities present within the required LLD's.

Quarterly Tritium Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

Neither preoperational nor operational samples have had detectable activities present within the required LLD's.

No trend plots of the river water pathway are provided due to the lack of variation in the data. Since 1977, all of the quarterly gamma and tritium analyses have been less than LLD.

i l

l l

TABLE III-7 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUNHARY

. CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/82-12/31/C2 PATHWAY

TYPE 1 ND_.

LLD

ALL LOCATION

HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION

CONTROL $NRR

- - - - S**************************************LOCATIDH *************

RIVER WATER * * * * *

PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * * * * *

ANALYSIS 4 * * * * *

0

DA-140

17.0* ND( 0/ 4)* * * *

I-131

17 0* ND( 0/ 4)* * * *

*

t

t

CS-134

17.08 ND( 0/ 4)* * * *

$

CS-137

17.0* ND( 0/ 4)* 8. * *

CO-5B

17.0* ND( 0/ 4)* * * *

MN-54

15.0* ND( 0/ 4)* * * *

t

t * * *

ZN-65

30.0* ND( 0/ 4)* * * *

CD-60

17.0* ND( 0/ 4)* * *

PATHWAY A TYPE 5 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIDHS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A RIVER WATCR A A A A A A A (PCI/MG) A TRITIUM A A A A A A

+ ANALYSIS 1A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A H-3 A 200.0A <LLD( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

TABLE III-8 RIVER WATER Sampling No.of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pcl/kg) (pci/kg)

G mma

__ Analysis I131 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD B2140 all <LLD 4 17 < LLD ---

Co 58 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD Cs 137 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD Cs 134 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD Mu54 all <LLD 4 15 < LLD Zn 65 all <LLD 4 30 <LLD --

Co 60 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD --

Tritium all <LLD 4 200 <LLD

#D: fined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational prcgram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

l 1

GROUND WATER PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze ground water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semlannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. All operational samples had no detectable activity (except for naturally occurring isotopes) and there are no preoperational data.

Semiannual Tritium Analysis There are no critical stations in this pathway. All operational samples had no detectable activity and there are no preoperational data.

1 l

l

TABLE III-9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING FROGRAM SUMMAPY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERI'0D 01/01/02-12/31/02 PATHWAY

TYPE

NO.

LLD

AL

- - tt*************************************LLOCATIONS **********************************

HIGHEST MEAR LOCA TION

CONTROL LOCATION *NRR

- - - - t*********************

* *

1 liROUND WATER * * * *

(PCI/KG)

OAMMA * * *

ANALYSIS 2* * * * *

* *

0 PA-140

17.0* ND( 0/ 2)* * *

I-131

17.0*

ND( 0/ 2)* * *

CS-134 *

17.0t ND( 0/ 2)* *

I * * * *

$

CS-137

17 0* ND( 0/ 2)* * *

1

CO-58

17.0* ND( 0/

2)* * *

NN-54

15 0* ND( 0/ 2)* * * *

2N-65

30.0* ND( 0/ 2)* *

CD-60

17.0* ND( 0/ 2)* *

PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A GROUND WATER A A A A A A A (PCI/KO) A TRITIUM A A A A A A A ANALYSIS 2A A A A A A' A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A i

A H-3 A 200.0A <LLD( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A O

TABLE m-10 GROUND WATER Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parcmeter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Grmma Analysis I 131 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD Ba 140 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD -- '

l l Co58 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD --

Cs 137 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD --

Cs 134 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD Mu54 all <LLD 4 15 <LLD --

Zn 65 all <LLD 4 30 <LLD Co 60 all <LLD 4 17 <LLD Tritium all < LLD 4 200 <LLD

DIfined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational 7 program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

T i

g

% \

., i e,'

POfABLE WATER PATHWAY s.s

. s s '

+ s 3,

Nx -

sN, , ;,

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze potable wrter samples. There are no additional stationst'or this pathway. -

, s Quarterly Gamma Analysis ' '

~ i i

All samples were collected and analyzed. Tnere are no critical stations in this pathway.

t The 1982 opcrational activity was generally less than the preoperational activity levels and consistent with previous operational years' activities.

s .

The following discrepancy was noted:

-CIO first quarter 2n-65 sample LLD exceeded Technical Specification LLD by less than 0.5%

Quarterly Tritium Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway. All '

sample activities were less than the sample LLD or non-detectable. -

I, t. .s c,

[ f g

,% N, ,

\\

\s

s T

6. g s '

i

, e

'i i 3,

6 6 A

T g om

, I *

'\

i p

1 '

s s

i g

, ('.,- y- - - . . . .. . -

3-

., g f..- -

o i/ .,

f f 7/ . ' --

,< ~ - *s ' (

~ , -

y [

't v , '_, ' , -

- -n e 1: ,

~s . ;_

/,> - '

9'

, TABLE'IIIh1 -

J '-

~

ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONff0 RING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

f -

,.- ,- , , ..z,. ,

CRYSTAL RIVEP UNIT N .- DOCKET NO.50-302 / ,

- ~~ .,

CITRUS COUNi . FLORIDA REPORTIAG PERIOD 01/01/82-12/31/82 , , .

r* ~: ..

PATHWAY

TYPE 1 NO.

LLD *.'ALL LOCATIONS

HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION

CONTROL LOCATION *NRR i

- - - - stwt***********

POTABLE WATER L f

/

r

tFCI/KG) C "?.NMA ,

t .

-- -* ~ * , t <

'[C, '

, t I N G L C.~I ON

ANALYSIS 12

t%, / s' *

f'

1

'.,t i * *, * /* 't

.. t -

a 1" - * ~'s . f ,' *./ / I '

-* ;* ~14. 7 C dp(' 1/ [th)* ' -#g. * *

~

! , DA-140 /,, *2 ~ 1.s4 *ff l* 't *l 't *

/ s>

'ft - * <

# I 'k 31 * -%9.' 7.3(/ 1/-/:24*C1'N f O 7. 3 (' 1/r 4)* 7.3f 1' 2.M S -

* .O 9.3 rf^e.3)**'~' + t 7 3- / !.3)* ( 7.3- ;' .3 )

t'..._.*' / . , /> := ; t * * -

, CS-334 * ' $.49 13.6( 1/ 1241C10

13.6( 1/ 4)* "3.6( 1( 12)* ,/

e 13.6- 13.6)F * ( 13.6- 13 6)* ( --13 6- 14 6)*

/, *3,e .,

8 "

-5 g g g g 9.- g d ,-

f- ' CS-137

5.9% 6.0( 1/ 12)*C07 t '6.0( 1/ 4)*, 6.0i 1/ 12)* ,

'/,

/ fi i6.0- 6.0)t -

* * ( 6.0- 6.0)* 't 6.0- 4.0)* -

, 3 I - . , g g 3 ,'s 3 g -

f'

CO-58

5.6* <LLD( 0/ 12)* 4 * *- -

*

t

j * % -

*

3j t * * * ' ~,

' ^

MN-54

0/ 12)* * *

5 1* <LLeo e 3' * *

i.

l

A * * ,

.' s ;/

2N-65 % 11.1* ND4 , 0/ 12)* * * ,/_

I t t *( ' -

t t ~* 'l /f, - * ,

CD-60

6 3*

6.2(

1/ 12)*C07

6.2( 1/i t*i 6.2(

t/- 12)*

e, j'.;) .

*

f 6.2- 6.2)* * ( 6.2- '6f2)* ( 4.2- 6 2)* '<

t '* 3 t * ,g ,s ,

't o'

PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLQ - A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST NEAN LOCATION A CONfRDL' LOCATION ANRR ,;

l A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Akk*a A A A A A AAACsAA A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A AA A A AA A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 8 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A # A A A 4 -

A ~. '

POT (.DLE WATER A A A: - , A A A /~ , ' ( * /

(PCI/MG) A TRITIUM A A- ./' - /- A A -A '

/-/*? [ .'

A ANALYSIS / 12 A A,[- A A ~

A >

A'*>

/

, A 4 H A A A , ,, A' ,. ~ / .- A

]~_

l A A A J/, - A -A '

A A

,'~

A H-2 A 565.0k G Lut U/ 12)A A

( A i A A A . A A "," , . , .

-4 _

- A l

i A A A A A,

,,/,' ,- ', ,4 y A

,?" f' ) [

i l

1

TABLE IB-12 POTABLE WATER Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pcl/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

G mma Analysis I131 all 7.3 12 5.9 --

C10 1 6.0 7.3 100/ preop Bn 140 all <LLD 12 17.7 <LLD 500/ preop Cs 137 all 6.0 12 5.9 --

C07 --

1 4.3 6.4 200/ preop Cs 134 all 13.6 12 5.9 <LLD 150/ preop Co 58 all <LLD 12 5.6 <LLD 150/ preop Mu54 all <LLD 12 5.1 <LLD 200/ preop Zn 65 all <LLD 12 11.1 <LLD 200/ preop Co 60 all <LLD 12 6.3 --- ---

C07 ---

1 3.2 6.2 200/ preop

~

Tritium all <LLD 12 565 <LLD 12000/ preop cD:; fined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational prt: gram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperaticaal pregram or operating station used to calculate limit.

l i

l I

l l

d

~

FIGURE III-4 POTABLE WATER NUCLIDE TRENDS f

?

8.

10 1

(>

l l Da /40 m

% ze dS 2 s

- s, f- TN,32 /JJ 'A!!<

p 0

l 10 l

l 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

SHORELINE EXTERNAL SEDIMENT PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze shoreline external sediment samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The critical stations for this analysis are Sample Stations C14H, C14M and C14G.' No sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value.

The 1982 operational data showed nuclide concentrations generally lower than the preoperational data and consistent previous years' operational data.

Semiannual Sr-90 Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The critical stations are Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G. No sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value.

There are no preoperational data and the 1982 data showed no significant change in Sr-90 concentration, in this pathway, over previous years' concentrations.

l l

TABLE III-13

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NONITORINO PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVRR UNIT 3 DOCHET No.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/82-12/31/82 A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A A A A A A A BOT. GEDIMCHTS A A A A A A (PCI/MG) A GAMMA A A 0 A A A A

SHOREL1HC CXP. A ANALYSIS 10 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 14.3A ND( 0/ 10)A A A

A A A A A A A A A A A

A A 2)A 29.9( 2/ 4)A TH-232 A 10.4A 29.9( 2/ 10)AC09 A 39.1( 1/

A A A ( 20.8- 39.1)A A ( 39.1- 39.1)A ( 20.8- 39.1)A A A A A A A A A A A ND( 0/ 10)A A A 1-131 A 4.1A A A A A A A I A A A A A A A w A 2)A 97.6( 4/ 4)A

"' A RA-226 A 15.3A 398.0( 10/ 10)AC14HA 1000.7( 2/

A A A ( 45.2-1278.3)A A ( 723.0-1278.3)A ( 45.2- 133.0)A A

8 A A A A A A 4)A 2/ 2)A 7.3( 1/

CS-134 A 4.3A 8.7( 4/ 10)AC14HA 9.7(

7.3)A A

A A ( 7.3- 10.6)A A ( 8.9- 10.6)A ( 7.3-A A A A A A A A A A A 20-106 A 31.4A HDt 0/ 10)A A A

A A A A A A A A A A A A 4)A A

2/ 10)AC01 A 25.4( 1/ 2)A 25.61 1/

A CC-137 A 5.0A 17.7(

( 25.6- 25,6)A A A ( 9.9- 25.6)A A ( 25.6- 25.4)A A A A A A A A A 2)A 8.8( 1/ 4)A A %R-?S A 6.6A 8.8( 1/ 10)AC01 A 8.8( 1/

( 8.8- 8.8)A A ( 8.8- B.8)A A ( 8.8- B.8)A A A A A A A A A A

4.1( 1/ 10)AC14MA 4.1( 1/ 2)A ND ( 0/ 4)A A HN-54 A 3.9A A A A ( i.1- 4.1)A A ( 4.1- 4.1)A A A A A A A A A A A

A %H-65 A 8.7A N0( 0/ 10)A A A

/ A A A A A A A A A A A A 4)A 47.7A 176.8( 10/ 10)AC14HA 329.3< 2/ 2)A 90.5( 4/

A K-40 A

( 50.5- 140.9)A A A A ( 50.5- 364.7)A A ( 294.0- 364.7)A A

A' A A A A A

A A A A A A

POTTOM SED. A A A A A

( PC I /l"U A SR 09/90 A A A A A A 0 A

SHORELINC EXT A ANALYSIS 10 A A A A A A A A A A A A A

A A 10)AC01 A39.00( 1/ 2)A26.50( 3/ 4)A A SR-90 A 0.10A17.90( 7/

(39.00-39.00)A (10.30-39.00)A A A A ( 0.28-43.30)A A A

A A A A A A

TABLE 15-14 SHORELINE EXTERNAL SEDIMENTS i

1 Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

G:mma Analysis Ra 226 all 398 10 15.3 1278 --

C14H *

1 40.5 1278 1760/C09 C14M *

1 13.8 337 1760/C09 C14 G * * --

1 13.9 579 1760/C09 Th 232 all 29.9 10 10.6 C14H** 2 15.5 <LLD 700/C09 C 14M *

2 10.4 <LLD 700/C09 C14G** 2 13.7 <LLD 700/C09 C09 1 11.6 39.1 700/C09 1131 all < LLD 10 4.1 <LLD C14H *

2 5.5 < LLD 78/C09 C14M *

2 4.3 <LLD 78/C09 C14G** --

2 5.4 <LLD 78/C09 CD: fined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational pr: gram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational pr gram or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

l l

l l . . . _ _ . _ - . _ _ _ - - - -- -

TABLE HI-14 SHORELINE EXTERNAL SEDIMENTS Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pcl/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) ' (pci/kg)

GTmma Analysis (corft)

Ba 140 all <LLD 10 14.2 <LLD C14H** 2 16.5 <LLD 275/C09

! C14M * * --

2 14.4 <LLD 275/C09 C14G** -- 2 18.6 <LLD 275/C09 Ru 106 all <LLD 10 31.6 <LLD C14H** 2 45 <LLD 568/C09 Cl4M** --

2 32.4 <LLD 568/C09 C14G*

2 39.4 <LLD 568/C09 ;

Cs 137** all 17.7 10 5.0 C14H*

2 7.2 <LLD 83/C09 C14M *

2 2.8 9.9 83/C09 C14G** 2 6.0 <LLD 83/C09 C01 1 3.7 25.6 83/C09 j Zr 95 all 8.8 10 6.6 --

! C14H** 2 9.2 <LLD 163/C09

! C14M *

2 6.7 <LLD 163/C09 C14G*

2 8.8 <LLD 163/C09 C01 1 2.8 8.8 163/C09 l

4 cDrfined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational preyam or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

l TABLE IE-14 SHORELINE EXTERNAL SEDIMENTS Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Mean Samples LLD le Value Location Parameter Location Sing (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci /kg) (pci/kg)

G mma Analysis -

(corft) all 8.7 10 4.3 10.6 Cs 134**

6.9 10.6 122/C09 C14H** 1 C14M*

2 4.7 <LLD 122/C09 6.4 7.8 122/C09 C14G** -

1 all 4.1' 10 3.9 4.1 Mn54 C14H** -- 2 5.4 <LLD 80/C09 C14M * * --- 1 2.2 4.1 80/C09 C14G** -

2 5.2 <LLD 80/C09 all <LLD 10 8.7 <LLD Zn 65 C14H** 2 11.9 <LLD 162/C09 2 9.1 <LLD 162/C09 C14M*

C14G** -- 2 11.9 <LLD 162/C09 l cD; fined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational prcgram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

o* Critical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

l 1

TABLE ID-14 SHORELINE EXTERNAL SEDIMENTS Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Grmma Analysis (con't)

K 40 all 176.8 10 47.7 365 --

Cl4H *

1 82.1 365 1347/C09 C14M * * --

1 54.9 202 1347/C09 Cl4G** ---

1 68.9 194 1347/C09 ,

Sr 90 all 18.0 10 8.1 43.3 --

Cl4H * * ---

1 0.37 1.4 331/C09 C 14M * * ---

1 23.9 43.3 331/C09 C14G *

2 15 <LLD 331/C09 ODcfined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational pregram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational pr: gram or operating station used to calculate limit, ooCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

i I

. . .rp FIGURE.III-5' _-

. - -~ ~ -1 SHORELINE EXTERNAL ~ SEDIMENTS NUCLIDE TRENDS

~

e me 2 gm 10 ___ -

v ~

s

--O M 90

(

ec w -A R

~

..-y 101_ .

~ . - . ._. y l[$

._.I . . . _ . . . _ _ . _ . _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ .

+^ 5:3 l c Ba 140 cs

_g .__ _ . . _

. ,p , y

, t_

-p _ .. y , y .. .

Wi s

.N g

\ ~ _. _ _ . _ _ _ . .

10 0'

. . _ . _. -~ _. - - _ . _ - . . _ - _ -._.

l(

_.___--._.__.--._.--. -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- =__- _ _ . . . . . . . _ . _ _.

1977 1678 1979 1980 1981 19'82 SEAFOOD CHAIN PATHWAY (MARINE PLANTS)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze marine plants in the seafood chain. There are no addiitonal stations for this pathway.

Semlannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

The 1982 operational concentrations are generally less than the preoperational concentrations and are consistent with previous operational years' concentrations.

l Semiannual Sr-89 and 90 Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

There are no preoperational data and the 1982 data showed an increase in the Sr-90 concentration, in this pathway, over previous years' concentrations, however, C30, the control station also displayed the increase indicating the Sr-90 trend to be non-plant related.

RA 1 0 RA HA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

) ) ) ) ) )

A ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NA 27 22 21 28 2 20 20 OA . 5 IA 5 1 7 3 0 TA 2 6 7 1 1 9 AA / / / / / /2 1 CA 1 1 2 1 0 27 //

OA - - - - - 23 LA 7 3 3 8 0 5 A .

LA (5 ( 1 ( 9 (3 ( ( 5 7 OA 73 36 25 81 2 RA D 5. 0 ( (

TA 5 1 0 3 N 77 2 l

t A 2( 6( 6( 1( 4( 5 0A 2 CA 7 3 A 1 2 AAAnAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

) ) ) ) ) )

8 A )) ) ) ) 3 ) 1

/ NA 27 22 24 28 21 20 20 Y 1 OA .

5

_ R 3 IA 5 1 9 3 3 0 A / TA 2 6 8 1 3 1 9 M 2 AA / / / / / /5 1 M 3 1 CA 1 1 2 t 1 27 //

U 0 - OA - - - - - - 23 S 3 2 LA 7 2 1 0 5

- 8 A . C. .

M 0 / t t A ( 5 ( 1 t ( 3 ( 3 ( 5 7 A 5 1 AA 72 26 i 31 1 3 2 R 0 EA . . 5. 0 ( (

G O / MA 5 1 3 3 3 77 2 O H 1 A 2( 6( 7( 1( 3( 6( 5 R 0 TA 2 P T SA 7 3 E D EA 1 G

t K

C O

I HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA GA I O R IA 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 5 R D E HA 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 1 O P A C C C C C C C T AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA I G A ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

I N H A 47 12 4 11 4 18 41 1 4 40 30 3 I O 1 A .

5 IM T SA 5 1 3 3 0 R HA 2 6 1 3 1 9 EL O GA / / / / / /5 1 LA P I A 1 2 / 1 / 2 1 / / 17 // /

BC I E TA - - 0 - 0 - - 0 0 - 33 0 A 3 R AA 7 1 2 1 7 5 G CA . .

T O T OA ( 5 ( 8 ( 7 (4 ( 3 ( 7 7 L I LA 72 72 0 13 5 0 N A A ( G. ( . ( ( 2. 9 ( ( (

I U D LA 5 1 D 0 D 0 3 0 f 1 33 1 D I LA 2( 1( N 7( !t 1 ( 3( N N 0( 3 D A R R AA 7 N W E O A 5 3 V L A 1 L I F A AA A A A A A A 9A A A 0A A A 7A A A 0A A A A A A 5A A A 1A A A A A A A A A A A '. A A A A A A A A A A A A A R 6 7 4 0 7 T , A .

5 8 R L Y DA 0 3 5 5 5 7 1 4 7 0 5 E A T LA 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 0

H T N LA 2 6 N S U A D

k Y

R O

C AA4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA' A

AAA I C A i i V p . A t U OA E k HA 0 2 1 4 6 /

T A S 4 3 3 3 0 3' 5 1 5 0 0S 0 9 I 1A I 1 2 1 2 1 1 9 5 6 1 9I 9 8 C A S - - - - - - - - - - /S - -

EA AY A H I A U G N. N N H 9Y R R PA ML B T R W C ' I I 2 8L S S YA MA A TA AN RN A GA SA A

AA4AAA4AAAAAAAAAAA A

AAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A N A N T I A f I N A A f l A A) H YA A H LGC AA L) C PM WA PG / D HA KD EIO TA C/O NCO AA HIO II' F PA (

CF R( A A RPA A E A A( E M S 6 M S

~

I

$I n_

TABLE IB-16 MARINE PLANTS Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

G mma Analysis Rn 226 all 70.8 4 15.8 C29 1 20.8 89.4 930/C30 Th 232 all 44.7 4 13.0 C30 1 12.6 61.2 1010/C30 I131 all <LLD 4 5.7 <LLD Bn 140 all 25.7 4 20.9 -- --

C30 1 21.7 25.7 280/C30 Ru 106 all <LLD 4 55.6 <LLD Cs 137 all 10.0 4 7.5 --

C30 1 7.3 13.8 184/C30 Zr 95 all 33.1 4 11.1 --

C29 --

1 10.9 33.1 127/C30 l

l

! cDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational prcgram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ThdLE HI-16 (Con't)

MARINE PLANTS Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pcl/kg)

G mma Analysis (Con't)

Mn54 all <LLD 4 6.9 <LLD --

Zn 65 all <LLD 4 17.4 <LLD K 40 all 5988 4 240 --

C30 --- 1 106 7510 79500/C30 Sr 89 all <LLD 4 6.58 <LLD Sr 90 all 13.3 4 0.57 C30 --

1 0.73 19.5 364/C30

Defined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational prcgram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

g;l*

4 gg .. .- -.. _._. .

_ _ ~ _ . - -

..-SEAFOOD CHAIN --(MARINE PLANTS)-NUCLIDE-TRENDS'

.- - - - . . . - .. . - . . - _ - . - ~ . . . _ _ _ . . _ _ . - . ., gy

... -- . . _ . _ . . . _ . _ - . _ . _ _ . ~ _ .

- -~_

~_ _. - .. _ _ _ _ ___ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ . _ . _ .

.4 2

10 _.

.._, p

(

t Ra, 2%

U --

b ..

Ru106

_ _ _ g

(

O Th 212 i_ .. .

(

Ze 95 e_

-O Os NO 101-A zn 65 G 90 1_ - _ . - _ . . -- . . g y7 _.. . .

l t

y a

[

t _ _ _ . . . . _ _I _ _

9 g g . ._ _ ..

-\ + .

te 87 c_ _

[, = z

l_. .. .. -_._ . ._. -

.. . . . . . ..-.---..-__--..a . . _ - . . . -.. - . .

.-._ i . .. ' -d'.

( _ _ _ _ _ .

~~

'* . ;_r: ' _ _. ~-~

' ~ ~ ' " ~ ~ ' ~ ~ - ~ ~ - -

~

_-_1._._. - . _ -

~

_ _ . _. 1- . _ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ Z._ _ 4 _

l I 1d81 1982 wmi.us.na 9 77 1978 1979 1980 4 Qtto a lh tu the inct. -. .- -

i I

INGESTION PATHWAY (CRAB)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze crabs. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semlannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station or preoperational values.

The 1982 operational concentrations are generally less than the preoperational concentrations and consistent with previous years' operational concentrations.

TABLE III-17 l

ENVIRONMENTAL RADI0 LOGICAL MONITORING FROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/82-12/31/82 i

A TYPE 8 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR PATHWAY AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A

' A A A A A A A A CRABS A A A A A A A (PCI/NG) A GAMMA A A A A 0 INGESTION A ANALYSIS 4A A A A A A A A

! A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 21.7A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A TH-232 A 11.3A HDt 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 4

A A I-131 A 6.0A (LLD( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A I

98.0( 4/ 1)AC30 A 113.8( 2/ 2)A 113.8( 2/ 2)A A RA-226 A 17.1A on

>d A A A ( 34.8- 129.6)A A ( 108.6- 119.0)A ( 108.6- 119.0)A A A A A A A A 4)AC30 A 9.3( 1/ 2)A 9.3( 1/ 2)A g

A CC-134 A 4.5A 9.3( 1/

( 9 .'3 - 9.3)A A A A ( ?.3- 9.3)A A ( 9.3- 9.3)A A A A A A A A A

A RU-106 A 53.2A HD( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A- A A A A A A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 7.1A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

HD( 0/ 4)A A A A ZR-95 A 10.2A A A A A A A A A

' A A A A A A A

A MM-54 A 5.6A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

A ZH-45 A 13.9A HD( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A I A A A A A A A A A A

A K-40 A 162.0A 1780.1( 4/ 4)AC30 A 2150.4( 2/ 2)A 2150.4( 2/ 2)A A A A (1100.0-22io.0)A A (2060.9-2240.0)A (2060.9-2240.0)A A A A A A A A

l

TABLE III-18 CRABS Sampling No.of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pcl/kg) (pci/kg) l G mma Analysis Rs 226 all 98 4 17.1 129.6 C29** 2 21.6 129.6 1300/C30 l

Th 232 all <LLD 4 11.3 <LLD C29** --- 2 9.6 <LLD 158/C30 1131** all <LLD 4 6.0 <LLD C29** -- 2 5.1 <LLD 98/C30 Bm 140 all <LLD 4 21.7 <LLD C29** 2 18.8 <LLD 259/C30 Ru 106 all <LLD 4 53.2 <LLD --

C29** --- 2 46.8 <LLD 720/C30 l

CDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational pr: gram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

i ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

l

TABLE HI-18 (Cont)

CRABS Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gemma Analysis (Con't)

Cs 137+* all LLD 4 7.1 LLD C29** 2 6.1 LLD 108/C30 Zr 95 all LLD 4 10.2 LLD C29** --

2 8.6 LLD 130/ preop Cs 134*

all 9.3 4 6.5 --

C29** 2 5.9 LLD 80/C30 C30 --

1 6.6 9.3 80/C30 Mn54 all LLD 4 5.6 LLD C29** 2 4.9 LLD 79/C30 Zn 65 all LLD 4 13.9 LLD C29** 2 11.9 LLD 188/C30 K 40 all 1780 4 162 --

C29* 1 223 1640 23100/C30 C30 --

1 92.6 2240 23100/C30 i

)

l OD: fined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational l prcgram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's

l. influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational j prcgram or operating station used to calculate limit.

l l OcCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

e -

w -, . -

,, ,,-,w --.r ~ , - - . - - - -- - . , , - - ., - --,. .,,-, , - , - , , . . . , - , -

Y FIGURE -III-7 - - -

~~

_ _ _ _ . _ _ .[_ ._ _

N ?ATHWAY ~(CRABSTkUCLIDE TRENDS _

c _._ - . _ _ _ . _ . . _ . _ . . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ . . - _ . . _ . . - . _ _ . _ . . -__ .-

I 10: ,

k 40 e ___ . _ . . _ . . - _ . _ . . . . _ _ . _ . . _ _ . ._ _ . . _ _ .. .

O 10 2, , , , _ , _ _ _ __

t )

(

(,. yq Rs 226 w

Y o.

-~< '

g .._

Rs lot t

q . . . _ . _ _ . _ _

q l 1.__f _ - _.. - -

10 1 . _ . _ ._

_\

C -.

3 8* /VO S a a En m

,,,,,, 3 Zn $5

, Cs 137

' Y ZP

- Th A32 f 1 T Zr 97. __ _

l 5_ t O]._.

.. - . . . _ CC 134 . .

e_ __ .. ..

7 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^

Cs./J 7_ _ ._

e_ -- L : 1. g 3 g . - _ _ .

. .= ._T ~ ~ ~

~ ~

m.sv

.- _.- . . _ + - . . _ - - _ - . _ . . _ . .

S 10' 2 _

g-

' ^

._ ~ ... ._ _

=.f:-R_:=-- --

(

m_ :;.r _:--

1_. ._..- .

- .1: -l_Z _

j. ~ ~ ~

l w - -

w 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 l l . _ _ .

INGESTION PATHWAY (CARNIVOROUS FISH)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze carnivorous fish. There are no cdditional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station or preoperational values.

The operational concentrations for 1982 are generally less than the preoperational concentrations and consistent with previous years' operational concentrations.

4 TABLE III-19 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIGLOGICAL NOMITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/82-12/31/82 PATHWAY A TYPE t NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A CARN. FISH A A A A A A A (PCI/KG) A GAMMA A A A A A A -

INGCGTION A ANALYSIS 1A A A A A A 1 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A HA-14C 4 21.3A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A. A A TN-232 A 10.9A HD( 0/ +)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1-131 A 6.0A NUC O/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 8

A A RA-226 A 12.9A 17.2( 1/ 4)AC29 A 48.9( 2/ 2)A 45. 4( 2/ 2)A La A A A ( 19.7- 72.4)A ( 25.2-

A 72.6)A ( 19.7- 71.1)A A -A A A A A A t A CC-134 A 7.0A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A RU-104 A 48.6A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CC-137 A 7.8A 50.8( +/ 4)AC30 A 71.3( 2/ 2)A 71.3( 2/ 2)A A A A ( 14.6- 124.0)A ( 16.4- 124.01A A ( 16.6- 126.0)A A A A A A A A A ZR-95 A 10.2A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A. A A A A A A A NN-54 A 4.1A 6fD( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A ZN-65 A 14.0A HDt 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A K-10 A 201.1A 3808.3( 4/ 4)AC30 A 4063.5( 2/ 2)A 4043.5( 2/ 2)A A A A (2826.2-4280.0)A A (3966.9-1160.0)A (3966.9-1160.0)A A A A A A A A a

TABLE 15-20 CARNIVOROUS FISH Sampling No.of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD le Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) Sing (pci /kg) (pci/kg)

G mma Analysis Rs 226 all 47.2 4 12.9 72.6 C29** 1 14.9 72.6 1170/C30 Th 232 all <LLD 4 10.9 <LLD C29** -

2 9.8 <LLD 208/C30 1131 all <LLD 4 6.0 <LLD C29** -- 2 5.5 <LLD 100/ preop Bn 140 all <LLD 4 21.3 <LLD --

C29** 2 18.5 <LLD 357/C30 Ru 106 all <LLD 4 48.6 <LLD --

C29** - 2 41.8 <LLD 554/C30 Cs 137** all 50.8 4 7.8 --

C29** 1 7.8 30.5 430/ preop C30 1 7.9 126 430/ preop 1

CDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

OoCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

9 ... . . . . . . .

TABLE IE-20 (Con't)

CARNIVOROUS FISH Sampling No. of Highest Parameter Location Limit

Mean Samples LLD Single Value (pci/kg) Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

G:mma Analysis (Con't)

Zr 95 all < LLD 4 10.2 <LLD C29** 2 8.8 <LLD 120/ Preop Cs 134** all <LLD 4 7.0 <LLD C29** --

2 6.1 <LLD 101/C30 Mn 54 all <LLD 4 6.1 <LLD --

C29'* -

2 5.3 <LLD 89/C30 Zn 65 all <LLD 4 16.0 <LLD -

C29** --

2 13.7 <LLD 238/C30 K 40 all 3808 4 201 4280 C29** -

1 102 4280 38550/ preop 1

7 l

ODIfined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational prrgram oc operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

4- ~

C ~~ Z ~ Z '_'_ E 1 .~_~.E Z Z.~.~_~_ Z .T Z __. FIGURE _III-B

~-- ~ ~----~ -~ -~~ INGESTION PATHWAT -(CARNIVOROUS risti) RUCLTDE TRENDS _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _

g gg 4 __

3 ; - - - - - - - -

10 -

t___ _ ._. __.-._ . __

f _.. _

10 2 _ , .

t 4

y _-

o -

CL

~- -

~; /06 10 1

._4 . - _ . - . _ . - _ _ _ - . Ba /YO 4

\

Ra 226

~~

'~ ~ ~

n . - . . _ _ _ Th 2 2 2 __ _ _

i . . _ _

c __

_ _~ 3 .

Cr 434 - - - - -

t-Z l31 fl% EY -

g ._

L_ - _ _ _ _ _ _

10 0 3-

_ _- ~ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ .__. . . _ . ._ _

~ ~

~

.iG-.._=

I = .-

= . = . _

- -_:n ~

~

1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

' J INGESTION PATHWAY ( HERBIVOROUS FISH)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze herbivorous fish. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis No smples were caught during the second semiannual period at critical location C29 and Station C30. All othe; samples were collected and analyzed."

The 1982 operational concentrations are generally lower than preoperational concentrations and are consistent with previous years' operational concentrations.

l I

l l

TABLE III-21 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET No.50-302 CITEUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/0!/82-12/31/82 PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL. LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A HERB. FISH A A A A A A A (PCI/XG) A GAMMA A A A A A A INGEST (ON A ANALYSIS 4A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A

. A A A A A A .A A BA-140 A 27.4A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A TH-232 A 16.1A 23.2( 1/ 2)AC30 A 23.2( 1/ 1)A 23.2( 1/ 1)A A A A ( 23.2- 23.2)A A ( 23.2- 23.2)A ( 23.2 .23.2)A A A A A A A A A I-131 A 7.6A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A RA-226 A 16.9A 142.0( 2/ 2)AC29 A 177.0( 1/ 1)A 107.0( 1/ 1)A

i A A A ( 107.0- 177.0)A A ( 177.0- 177.0)A ( 107.0- 107.0)A i

, A A A A A A A s A CS-134 A B.6A 8.9( 1/ 2)AC30 A 8.9( 1/ 1)A 8.9( 1/ 13A

, A A A ( 8.9- 8.9)4 A ( 8.9- 8.9)A ( 8.9- 8.9)A A A A A A A A A 20-106 A 69.3A NDt 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

A CS-137 A 9.0A 12.7( 1/ 2)AC30 A 12.7(, 1/ 1)A 12.7( 1/ 1)A A A A ( 92.7- 12.7)A A ( 12.7- 12.7)A ( 42.7- 12.7)A i A A A A A A A A ZR-93 A 13.iA ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A HN-Si A 7.2A 7.8( 1/ 2)AC30 A 7.8( 1/ 1)A 7.B( 1/ 1)A l A A A ( 7.8- 7.8)A A ( 7.8- 7.8)A ( 7.8- 7.8)A I A A A A A A A A %N-63 A 18.6A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A l A M-40 A 98.6A 2905.0( 2/ 2)AC30 A 3400.0( 1/ 1)A 3400.0( 1/ 13A A A A (2410.0-3io0.0)A A (3400.0-3400.0)A (3400.0-3400.0)A A A A A A A A

.i.

TABLE IH-22 HERBIVOROUS FISH Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location

~

(pci/kg) (pcl/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) ,_

Grmma Analysis Ra 226 all 142 4 16.9 177 C29** --

1 17.6 177 3100/ preop Th 232 all 23.2 4 16.1 --

C29** 2 17.1 <LLD 840/ preop I 131*

all <LLD 4 7.6 <LLD C29** 2 7.5 <LLD 100/ preop Ba 140 all <LLD 4 27.4 <LLD --

C29'* --

2 27.7 <LLD 500/ preop Ru 106 all <LLD 4 69.3 <LLD --

C29'* 2 72.9 <LLD 900/ preop Cs 137*

all 12.7 4 9.0 12.7 C29** 2 10.3 <LLD 1100/ preop C30 1 7.7 12.7 1100/ preop CDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit. !

ocCritical Pathway Sampie Station and critical radionuclides.

l

TABLE 1H-22 (Con't)

HERBIVOROUS FISH Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis (Con't)

Zr 95 all <LLD 4 13.4 <LLD C29** 2 13.7 <LLD 90/ preop Cs 134** all 8.9 4 8.6 C29** 2 9.4 <LLD 150/ preop C30 1 7.8 8.9 150/ preop Mn54 all 7.8 4 7.2 --

C29** 2 7.9 < LLD 200/ preop C30 1 6.4 7.8 200/ preop Zn 65 all <LLD 4 18.6 <LLD C29** 2 19.6 <LLD 630/ preop K 40 all 2905 4 98.6 C29** 1 110 2410 31006/ preop C30 -

1 87.2 3400 31006/ preop 1

CDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

- - - _ - - _ . -- ---- .~ _-. . - . . . , . . . . - - . - - . . -

l l

_. __.__ . . _ __ . _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _. . __ FIGURE 131-9

..___ ____ _ .~~ INGESTION PATHWAY -(HERBIVOROUS FISH) NUCLIDE TREND $

(

\

. .. . - . __-. C -

3 y go - -

g..i. e aw-. a . -

l 2

10 ,__

Ra.226

(.' ec H d

E. - -

6./06

--A I

~ ~

~

~~ 4 s se n'o w

]

10 1 . . _ - - - . . . . . .

Th 232.

E:Isr 3

\- x ,-

g 3_, f.

,y.,g 2

$W~ . 0 Y - - - - -

e _ - _

_ l 4 _ _ . _ . . . . . . . _ _ . . . . . - .. _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ -__ . . . - _ . . _ . . _ . j 10' : .

( ;

..-...._._'_-._[_-._._ _ _

l -

l

... . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. : . ~. - _ ::." :.1. '"~. . . . . * . . .

l 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1932

l 1

I INGESTION PATHWAY (OYSTERS)

The' University has the responsibility to collect and analyze oysters. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semia'nnual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

The 1982 operational cencentrations are consistent with previous years' operational concentrations and generally lower than the preoperational concentrations.

TABLE III-23 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/82-12/31/82 PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGilEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION AHRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A. A A A A OYSTCRS A A A A A A A A A (PCI/KG) A GAMMA A A A A INGESTION A ANALYSIS iA A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-110 A 28.3A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A TH-232 A 13.9A 28.1( 1/ 4)AC30 A 28.1( 1/ 2)A 28.1( 1/ 2)A A A A ( 28.1- 28.1)A A ( 28.1- 28.1)A ( 28.1- 28.1)A A A A A A A A A I-131 A 7.4A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A I A A A A A A A

, A RA-226 A '19.6A 91.3( 1/ 4)AC29 A 129.1( 2/ 2)A 59.5( 2/ 2)A m A .A A ( 39.6- 151.3)A A ( 107.0- 151.3)A ( 39.6- 79.4)A A A A A A A A

, 3 1 A- kU-106 A 73.1A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CS-137 A 9.5A 7.1( 1/ 1)AC30 A 7.it 1/ 2)A 7.4( 1/ 2)A A A 'A ( 7.1- 7.43A A ( 7.4- 7.4)A ( 7.1- 7.4)A A A A A A A A A 2k-95 A 12.6A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A l A A A A A A A

! A A A A A A A l A 'NN-51 A 6.8A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A IN-65 A 16.3A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 4 A K-10 A 150.5A 1384.8( 4/ 4)AC30 A 1423.8( 2/ 2)A 1423.8( 2/ 2)A A A A (1160.0-1687.6)A A (1160.0-1687.6)A (1160.0-1687.6)A

, A A A A A A A

TABLE III-24 OYSTERS Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter , Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Grmma Analysis Ra 226 all 94.3 4 19.6 C29 1 28.4 151 1410/C30 Th 232 all 28.1 4 13.9 C30 1 14.4 28.1 432/C30 I131 all <LLD 4 7.4 <LLD Ba 140 all <LLD 4 28.3 <LLD --

Ru 106 all <LLD 4 73.1 <LLD Cs 137 all <LLD 4 9.5 C30 1 6.6 7.4 108/C30 Zr 95 all <LLD 4 12.6 <LLD Mn54 all <LLD 4 6.8 <LLD Zn 65 all <LLD 4 16.3 <LLD K 40 all 1385 4 150.5 C30 1 214 1688 21600/C30 CDafined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95' percentile confidence value from preoperational pr: gram, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preeperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

l t

+

4 ' ___ __ _ __ ___. . . _

FIGURE -III-10 --

- - - - ~

~ INGESTION PATHVAY -(0YSTERS) NUCLIDE TRENDS _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - .

g 10 3 K Vo 10 2

-_t _ ._

t 4 m Q j-l & Ra au g 3 As tot

--1...

9*

4 4 8s iso + TA 22.2.

TA 10 1 '

te

, _ 3 Za 4S ze

/p- -

azar I _ . . . _ _ _ ..._._ . _ . _

m ._ . . . . _ _ _ _ _ . .

1 - .-_ _.... .__.. . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ . _ . _ .

} {I,3p _ __ -

_- _ . am ..

~

t_ . _ ___._ __ . _ _ . .

m _._ - _.m.% .,,

10* ._-- -- . . _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ . . _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . .

( I

= 77 - - . - - _ . . _ . _ . _ .. _

F V V W w w 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 68

INGESTION PATHWAY (SHRIMP)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze shrimp. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

The 1982 operational concentrations are consistent with previous years' operational concentrations and preoperational concentrations.

The 1982 samples were collected in the vicinity of the Discharge Canal rather than the Ralston Purina facility. This is because the Ralston Purina facility is no longer operating.

This collection method will replace Station C27 for this pathway.

The following discrepancy was noted:

-C27 Zn-65 LLD's exceeded, by less than 5%, the required LLD's primarily due to the small amount of sample collected.

TABLE III-25 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOOlcAL HONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 .

CITRUS COUNTYe FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/82-12/31/82 PATHWAY

TYPE

NO.

LLD

ALL LOCATIONS

HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION

CONTROL LOCATION *NRR

- - - - l******

t * * *

SHRIMP * * * * * * *

(FCI/KG)

OAMMA * * * * *

TNGESTION

ANALYSIS 2* * * * *

2 I

t 3A-140

29.89 ND( 0/ 2)* * * *

TM-232

15.6* 20 4( 1/ 2)*C27

20.4( 1/ 2)* 20.4( 1/ 2)*

* * ( 20.4- 20.4)* * ( 20.4- 20.4)* ( 20.4- 20.4)*

I-131

02* ND( 0/ 2)* * *

g

RA-226

23.4* 31.0( 2/ 2)*C27

01.0( 2/ 2)* 01.0( 2/ 2)*

* * ( 50.4- 111.5)* * ( 50.4- 111 5)* 50.4- 111 5)*

y * * * * * * *

RU-106

76.9* HD( 0/ 2)* * *

I * * *

t * *

CS-137

7.99 14.1( 2/ 2)*C27

14 1( 2/ 2)* 14 1( 2/ 2)*

* * ( 13.7- 14 5)* * ( 13.7- 14.5)* ( 13.7- 14.5)*

2R-95

14.B* ND( 0/ 2)* * * *

MN-54

3 38 MD( 0/ 2)* * * *

2N-65

20 8* ND( 0/ 2)* * * *

K-40

224.0* 2926 1( 2/ 2)*C27

2826.1t 2/ 2)* 2926 1( 2/ 2)*

* * (2252 1-3400.0)* * (2252 1-3400.0)* (2252.1-3400.0)*

t t t t t t t

1 c

TABLE III-26 SHRIMP l

Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter, Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis Ra 226 C27 81.0 2 23.4 112 300/ preop Th 232 C27 20.4 2 15.6 20.4 500/ preop I 131 C27 <LLD 2 8.2 <LLD 100/ preop Ba 140 C27 <LLD 2 29.8 <LLD 500/ preop Ru 106 C27 <LLD 2 76.9 <LLD 1200/ preop Cs 137 C27 14.1 2 9.9 14.5 200/ preop 2r 95 C27 < LLD 2 14.8 <LLD 200/ preop Mn54 C27 <LLD 2 8.3 <LLD 100/ preop Zn 65 C27 <LLD 2 20.8 <LLD 200/ preop K 40 C27 2826 2 224 3400 25140/ preop eDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

- Critical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

f- . ... - . - . .

.. . ...- FIGURE -111-11

~

3 . ~

._. E _2 [. ., INGESTIdN PATHWijf ,lSHRINP) N_ULTiDE Tl[END5 __

/ -

. 4 '.___._..

^

. ' ~ ~ 3 K 40 ~ ~ ~ ~

10 8 l

10 2 ._, _

g n-. ..

g g .

m --A 22s o a s06 g _

- 7% a - - - -

N~. ._

4 g, gw 1

10 rh .ts1 + za 63

'I a

f

_._.. _.- - j .. .. . . .-

1_

E _ _

E_

Q 3 2.234 A Fin JY e ., .:---

y .

e- .. . .

s 4--.--..--.--..-...:._.....

10 o*- .=--

( ,

~ ~ ~^'~

\

...~:. .: . ... - . :~.-'2:: .= .: . . - .

! - - --- - - : :-- - - .: . .. . ---- --* :.r .. ..: = - .: .

a..--.-...........-

.- _. . _ . ...__1......_.._o.-____..

t 1977 1978 1979 1980 19'81 1982 l _ . __ _ .__ _ _ . . _ _ _ . .. __ .- .. - _ _ _ . . .- - ._ -,

INGESTION PATHWAY (MILK)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze milk. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The samples at Sample Station C49, the critical station for this pathway, were not collected due to the unavailability of milk. All other samples were collected and analyzed.

The 1982 operational concentrations are consistent with previous years' operational concentrations and generally lower than the preoperational concentrations. The Ba-140 and I-131 values plotted on the Nuclide Trends represent only 1 measured value each out of 12 samples. All others were non-detectable.

Monthly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. Sample Station C49 is the critical station for this pathway and no samples were collected due to the unavailability of milk.

The 1982 operational concentrations are less than the preoperational values and are consistent with other operational concentrations.

TABLE 111-27 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAH

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 D0citET NO.50-302 .

CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/02-12/31/82 FATHWAY A TYPE E NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION AMRP AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A

.A A A A A A A A A M ILt( A A A A A A GAMMA A A (PCI/L) A A A A 0 INGESTION A ANALYSIS 24 A A A A A A 4 A A A A A A A A A

15.74 117.2( 1/ 12)AC47 A 119.2t 1/ 13)A 119.2( 1/ 12)A A 8A-140 A

( 119.2- 117.2)A A A A t 119.2- 119.2)A A i 119.2- 119.2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A I-131 A 4.8A 17.4t 1/ 12)AC47 A 17.4t 1/ 13)A 17.4( 1/ 12)A A A A t 17.4- 17.4)A A ( 17.4- 17.4)A ( 17. 4 ' 17. 4 ) A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A A

A C3-134 4 5.54 NDt 0/ 12)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A l A A A A A A A y

5.7A C.?( 0/ 12)AC47 A U.9( 8/ 12)A 8.7t 8/ 12)A

- A CS-137 A 4.4- 16.2)A A A A ( 4.4- 16.2)A A ( 4.4- 14.2)A (

I A A A A A A A

) A A A A A A A A ZR-95 A 7.3A 10.2t 1/ 13)AC47 A 10.2( 1/ 12)A 10.2t 1/ 125A !

A A A ( 10.2- 10.2)A A ( 10.2- 10.2)A ( 10.2- 10.2)A l A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

A CD-58 A 4.7A HDt 0/ 12)A A A A A A A A A A A' A A A A A A A A A A A A A 12)A A A A MM-54 A 4.8A ND( 0/ A A

A A A A A A

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CD-60 A 5.4A 9.2( 3/ 12)AC47 A ?.2( 3/ 12)A 9.2( 3/ 12)A A A A ( 7.6- 11.9)A A ( 7.4- 11.9)A ( 7.6- 11.9)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A M ILit A A A

A SR 89/90 A A A A A (PCI/L)

INGESTION A ANALYSIS 24 A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

A SR-90 A 0.38?A 3.034( 11/ 12)AC47 A 3.034( 11/ 12)A 3.034( 11/ 12)A A A A t 0.824- 5.410)A A ( 0.824- 5.410)A ( 0.824- 5.4101A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A

A SR-89 A 3.757A 7.073( 3/ 12)AC47 A 9.093t 3/ 12)A 9.093( 3/ 12)A 6 4 4 ( 4.500-14.000)A A ( 4.500-14.0003A ( 4.500-14.000)A L_______.._______._____________ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ .

I TABLE ID-28 MILK Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter - Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gnmma Analysis I 131** C47 17.4 24 4.8 17.4 Bn 140 C47 119 24 15.7 119 Cs 137 C47 8.9 24 5.7 16.2 Zr 95 C47 10.2 24 7.3 10.2 Cs 134 C47 <LLD 24 5.5 <LLD Co58 C47 <LLD 24 4.7 <LLD --

Mn54 C47 < LLD 24 4.8 < LLD Co 60 C47 9.2 24 5.4 11.9 Sr 89 C47 9.1 24 4.0 14 --

i Sr 90 C47 3.0 24 0.39 5.4 C47 is located in Gainesville, Florida, well outside the plants influence. Milk was unavailable frcm critical sample location C49 CD; fined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational pr: gram or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical radionuclides.

+

FIGURE-III-12

~

~ ~ ' ~

$_ _ INGESTIC" y4Tif5AY-(MIIf)~NVdL_IDE,_ TRENDS 2

\ 9a -

~__.

10 2

, .Ba NC

( ' ~+.a u

c, _

~

t da 10 1 ; __ _ . _ _ . _ _ . ._

o Z 421 1 .... _. .- _.

l 2 - c. Je . . _ _

f_/ I_. _ . _.

..__ A Z ,, 9y5 ,ffy,.3 g

~'

Q __ ~4 _ .f / _ . _ . .

g- - - - - -

!Me .

[ _

I e_ > .

l * -

Ce 58 4 m j~y 4_ - _ - . . _ _ . . .' _ . _ _ _ _ . .

_ _ . . .. _ . . _ ..._ _ . .___ _ ____ a _ _.. _.. a.-

10 82-

^

' - N -9 0---- --

(

._~ _~_. --

~ ~ '

. ' . .I: _, _

_~~___.:_.~.'__.__.*_ _ _ . . . . _

' ~

_.....____~.

, . _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ ._.__'..'_J_._._. '.. __ . .

_.4 _ __ i _ . . . .

1.9/7 1978 1979 19i10 1981 1982

l l INGESTION PATHWAY (ANIMAL)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze small terrestrial animals. There are no. additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis Samples for the first half of 1982 could not be obtained. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

The 1982 operational concentrations are consistent with preoperational and previous operational years' concentrations.

j

TABLE 111-29 ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL N0HITORIHQ PROGRAN

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCI:ET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, PLORIDA REPORTING PERICD 01/01/82-I2/31/82 PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A l

SMALL ANIMALS A A A A A A A (PCI/KC) A OAMMA A A A A A A IHOCSTION A ANALYSIS 2A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A DA-110 A 32.9A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A l A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A TH-233 A 17.3A HDt 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A I-131 A 9.0A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 3 A RA-234 A 29.4A 179.7( 1/ 1)AC15 A .179.7( 1/ 1)A 179.7( 1/ 1)A

-4 A A A ( 179.7- 179.7)A A ( 179.7- 179.7)A ( 179.7- 179.7)A 8 A A A A A A A I A RU-104 A 83.7A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A C3-137 A 13.1A 15.5( 1/ 13AC15 A 15.5( 1/ 1)A 15.5( 1/ 1)A A A A ( 15.5- 15.5)A A ( 15.5- 15.5)A ( 15.5- 15.5)A A A A A A A A A 1k-95 A 15.3A Nut 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A MM-51 A 8.5A HD( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A i A 2N-45 A 19.5A ND( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A ,

A A A A A A A I A K-10 A 311.2A 3321.2( 1/ 1)AC15 A 3321.2( 1/ 1)A 3321.2( 1/ 1)A l A A A (3321.2-3331.2)A A (3331.2-3321.2)A (3321.2-3321.2)A l A A A A A A A

TABLE IB-30 ANIMALS Sampling No.of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis Ra 226 C45 180 2 29.6 180 7200/ preop Th 232 C45 <LLD 2 17.3 <LLD 500/ preop I 131 C45 <LLD 2 9.0 <LLD 1000/ preop Ba 140 C45 <LLD 2 32.9 <LLD 500/ preop Ru 106 C45 <LLD 2 83.7 <LLD 1200/ preop Cs 137 C45 45.5 2 13.4 45.5 800/ preop Zr 95 C45 <LLD 2 15.3 <LLD 700/ preop Mn54 C45 <LLD 2 8.5 <LLD 100/ preop Zn 65 C45 <LLD 2 19.5 <LLD 1600/ preop K 40 C45 3321 2 314 3321 35866/ preop ;

CDefined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program or ,

10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperatior.al program or operating station us, to calculate limit.

E Mgb .

FIGURE-III-13 -

- _ . . ~' ~~ ~~ --~1NGESTION PATHWATTANIMALS)TCLTDE TRENDS i r _ __.___ __. _ _ . .___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -.. _ _ _ _ . __

k

~

VO s

lo .._ _ . . . _ . . _ . . . _ . .

.e_ . - - e.e. .. , _ , e%-.- m smhm * - * .

. . . . . . . -. -. . . . . - .'i'

.-.g m.up esa .- . .

M - m- g.. . . - - 4.'+e

_ l I

10 2 i

l OC ___

k,.e -- ARs /06 0 -

Q. . . . p

. A CrIM q ._ . _ . . _ _

10 1 :. __ ._ .

6. No

~

A

-- .. . - - .-. .--_... _ - - ~

y, .

"t) T4.2f.!

__ ^ . . - .

--O Ze f.f v cc /J'/

w-

' ~

[ ^

V._'_..

(

\ -/ _ _ _ _ _ _

8,

~ ... , x __- *f.~~~-- -

- - ~ ~ ' ' ~

10 . - . - - . . . . . . - . . . . . - - . . . . . -. - _-_ . .._ .- ..

.D .N.pe 6 e g. _-

.w a e

( :_

~---

~ - -

1._;- ;. _ ; .

. _.. . .i! . . . .

.- . . . - . - . . . . _.. . . . 4 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

... -M-.- .- .. _ - - _ - . - . -.

INGESTION FOOD CROPS PATHWAY (CITRUS)

The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze citrus samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Annual Gamma Analysis There are no critical stations in this pathway. All samples were collected and analyzed.

The 1982 operational analysis resulted in non-detectable activity as did all previous operational analyses. Therefore, no trend plots are included with this pathway.

l l

RA 0 RA NA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A

NA OA IA TA AA CA OA LA A

LA OA RA TA NA OA CA A

2 AAAAAAAA =AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 8 A

/ NA Y 1 OA R 3 IA A / TA M 2 AA M 2 1 CA U 0 - OA S 3 2 LA

- 8 A M 0 / NA A 5 1 AA R 0 EA G O / MA O N 1 A R 0 TA P T SA E D EA G t i O HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA N C I GA I O R IA 1 R D E HA 3O P A

- IT AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA) ) ) ) )

I G A ) ) )

1 1 I NO N A 1 1 1 1 1 1 I A I H T SA R NA EL O OA

/ / / /

LA P IA / / / /

0 0 BC E TA 0 0 0 0 0 0 AI 3 R AA TGO CA T OA L I LA ( ( ( (

0 N A A ( ( ( t 1 U D LA D D D D D D D n 9 I LA N H N H N H N H A R R AA R E O A V L A L I F AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA0 0 0 0 0 A R A 0 0 0 T , A N L Y DA 4 4 4 4 4 1 2 4 E A T LA 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 M T N LA N S U A O Y O AAAAAAAAAA4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA R R C A I C A 1

. U S .A .

N U OA C R NA 0 1 4 7 T A S 4 3 3 3 8 1 5 0 I 1A t 1 1 1 1 5 5 6 4 C A i - - - - - - - -

CA AY A I S 3 O M N* O FA ML B C C C M 7 C YA HA TA AN A GA A

AAAAAAAA4A44AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A

A A

YA AA )N WA GO HA t i (

TA AA M/T tI1 PA PCC A TPG A I( N A C I I

mN I i

INGESTION FOOD CROPS PATHWAY (WATERMELON)

The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze watermelon samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Annual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

there are no preoperational data for this pathway. The 1982 operational analyses resulted in non-detectable activity as did all previous operational analyses. Therefore, no trend plots were included for this pathway.

~ -- . - . .

TABLE III-32 CHVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PP0 GRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCI(CT NO.50-303 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA PCPORTING PERIOD 01/01/33-12/31/93 PATHNAY A TYPE t NO, A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTRDL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A WATCPMCLON A A A A A A A (PCI/MG) A GAMMA A A A A A A INGCGTION A ANALYSIS 1 A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A BA-140 A 29.0A ND ( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A I-131 A 24 0 A HD ( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CC-131 A 2+.0A ND ( 0/ s)A A A A

, A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

$ A CS-137 A 29.0A HD t 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A 8 A A A A A A A A 00-58 A 29.0A NO ( 0/ t)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A MH-Si A 21.0A HD ( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 7.N-65 A f2.0A ND ( 0/ 124 A A A ,

A . A A A A A A A A A 7 A A A A CO-40 A 2+.0A NO ( 0/ 1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 6

FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY (GRASSES)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze grass samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There are no critical stations in this pathway.

l The 1982 operational concentrations are similiar to previous operational and preoperational concentrations except for Ru-103, Cs-137, Th-232, and Ra-226. No operational events or effluent releases could be linked with these elevated data.

The following discrepancies were noted:

-C05 first half I-131 sample LLD equals the Technical Specification LLD due to a programming error.

-C40 and C05 first half Cs-137 LLD exceeded the Technical Specification required LLD due to the computer being down during the analysis. The actual concentrations were calculated with Nuclear Data firmware and LLD's calculated manually after the sample was removed from the system. Data shown is best values for method utilized.

l

TABLE III-33 '

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL HONITORING PROGRAN SUNNARY ,

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/82-12/31/82 PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD 'A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST Nte'1 LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAnAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A

A A A* A VEGETATION A A A A GAMMA A A A A

( PC I/ EC) A A TOOD CllAIN A ANALY3IS &A A A A A A 3 A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A

A BA-140 A 32.3A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A

A TH-232 A 19.5A 47.9( 3/ 6)AC40 A 45.2( 1/ 2)A 47.9( 3/ 4)A A A A ( 31.4- 45.2)A A f 65.2- 65.2)A ( 31.4- 45.2)A A A A A A A A A t-131 A 9.0A HD( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A I A A A A A A A

$ A RA-226 A 19.9A 86.7( 6/ &lACi0 A 120.2( 2/ 2)A 86.7( a/ &lA A A A ( 32.0- 140.0)A A ( 109.0- 131.3)A ( 32.0- 140.0)A 3

A A A A A A A A RU-104 A 45.1A HD( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A i A A A A A A A A

A CS-137 A 19.1A 405.2( 6/ 6)AC05 A 752.5( 2/ 2)A 405.2( 4/ 6)A A A A ( 14.1-1040.03A A ( 445.0-1060.0)A ( 14.1-1040.0)A A A A A A A A

A ZR-95 A 9.8A HD( 0/ 6)A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A A A A A A HN-Si A 6.74 14.1( 1/ 6)AC40 A 14.1( 1/ 2)A 14.1( 1/ 6)A A A A ( 11.1- 14.1)A A t 14.1- 14.1)A ( 14.1- 14.1)A A A A A A A A A %N-43 A 13.9A HD( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A M-40 A 181.5A 1525.6( 6/ 6)AC41 A 1793.4( 2/ 2)A 1525.6( 6/ 6)A A A A (1056.2-2110.3)A A (1520.0-2046.8)A (1056.2-2110.3)A A A A A A A A 1

6

TABLE 1H-34 GRASSES Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter ~ Location Mean Samples LLD le Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) Sing (pcl /kg) (pci/kg)

Gtmma Analysis Rs 226 all 86.7 6 19.9 C41 1 16.3 140 23630/ preop Th 232 all 47.9 6 19.5 --

C40 1 15.3 65.2 1200/ preop I 131 all <LLD 6 9.0 <LLD 100/ preop Ba 140 all <LLD 6 22.3 <LLD 2530/ preop Ru 106 all <LLD 6 65.1 <LLD 1200/ preop Cs 137 all 405 6 19.1 C05 1 7.8 1060 54160/ preop Zr 95 all <LLD 6 9.8 <LLD 310/ preop Mn54 all 14.1 6 6.7 C40 1 8.1 14.3 100/ preop Zn 65 all < LLD 6 12.9 <LLD 5890/ preop K 40 all 1526 6 181.5 C05 1 367 2110 24302/ preop

D: fined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (;

10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever i smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station use to calculate limit.

l

l l ,&

l yIGURE -III - - -

. j_ ~ ~

__ _ .'_ .. INGESTION'PATHWA{~(CRAS$ESTNDCLIDE T, RENDS t ._ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ . . - - - . _ . - .. - - . . . . . - - - . .

t - _. _. . . . .

10 8 -

--- .. . - - . _. km

-a p .. _. . _. . _ . .

4 ..

Cs /M i

10 2

.1

~

4

[ g *

\ T f ~__ y .

/ Rs 226 S. ~ Rn /0G 4-H - ._ . . ..

O 101 . . _ . _ . _ _ _ .. . _ . . . . _ . _ _ . _ _ _. .

AN

_/ _

y . __. . _

2_ ._

g,47 ._

g a . _. . . . __. _

\ >. . _ _ , __

f -

. _ . 1 e_ =. -V \ /~

__I___._..._.__

~

.{__.__._....__......_.

8 10 - - - - - - - -- ~ - - - - - - - - - -

'r----~ -

1- --

. - _..~. ~~.'".._T..

- ~

- ^z

_. _?:'..-

= _.'=:. : . _ .'. '. _ . .

l

- - - - ^ \

. . . . . _ . _ _ _ _ ,. q

~

1917 1978 1979 1![80 1981 1982

FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY (SOIL)

The University of Florida has the responsibility to collect and analyze soil samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

_ Gamma Analysis The soil sample collection and analysis is required once every three years. Samples were obtained in 1981 and are not required again until 1984.

i

FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY (MEAT)

The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze meat samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There is no critical station in this pathway. There are no preoperational data for this pathway. All 1982 operational analyses resulted in non-detectable activity which is consistent with previous operational analyses. Therefore, no trend plots were provided.

I

TABLE III-35 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCl:ET NO.50-303 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/93-13/31/82 PATHWAY A TYPE t NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION AHRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A MEAT A A A A A A A (PCI/MG) .A GAMMA A A A A A A r000 CilAIM A ANALY313 3A A A A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A 1: A-140 A 37.0A Nt:( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A (-131 A 33.0A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A g A CS-134 A 60.0A ND( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A

$ A A A A A A

A A

A I

A CS-137 A 37.0A HD( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CD-5B A 60.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A MN-31 A 33.0A HD( 0/ 3)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 2N-65 A 66.0A MD( 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CO-40 A 40.0A HD( 0/ 3)A A A .

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A I

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ ^ _____ _

i l

l FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY (POULTRY)

The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze poultry samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There is no critical station in this pathway. There are no preoperational data for this pathway.

The 1982 operational concentrations were non-detectable as were all previous operational concentrations, therefore, no trend plots were included.

l 1

1

TABLE III-36 CNVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCHET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/82-12/31/82 PATHlfAY A TYPE E NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA POULTRY A

A A A A A A AAA A A A (PCI/MG) A GAMMA A A A A A A FOOD CHAIN A A A ANALYSIS 2A A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 A A A A

A A A

A FA 140 A 39.0A His t 0/ 2)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A f- 1:11 A :fD.0A NDt A A

0/ 2)A A A A

A A I A A A A

A A A A e A A A W A CO-134 A 60.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A

A A A A

A A '

g A A A A A A A A A C1-137 A 37.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A CD-58 A 60.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A A A

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A NN-51 A 32.0A HD( 0/ 2)A A A A

A A A A A A A A .A A A A A A

A ZN-65 A 66.0A ND( 0/ 2)A A

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

A CO-60 A 60.0A N0( A A

A 0/ 2)A A A

A A A A A A A A A A A A

A A

1

FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY (EGGS)

The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze egg samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Semlannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. There is no critical sample station in this pathway. There are no preoperational data for this pathway and all 1982 operational analyses resulted in non-detectable activity as did all previous operational analyses.

Therefore, no trend plots were provided for this pathway.

f 9

- - - - - tp t , a % y

~

' RA 0 RA MA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A

NA

, OA IA TA AA CA OA LA A

LA OA RA TA NA OA CA A

3 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 8 A

/ NA Y 1 OA R 3 IA A / TA M 2 AA M 3 1 CA U 0 - OA S 3 2 LA

- 8 A M 0 / NA A 5 1 AA R 0 EA G O / MA O N 1 A R 0 TA P T SA E D EA G K O HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA N C I GA 7

I O R IA R D E HA

3- OT P A I I G AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

I N N A 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 I O I A M T SA E R NA L L O OA A P IA / / / / / /

B C E TA 0 0 0 0

/ /

AI 0 0 0 0 3 R AA TG CA O T OA L I LA O N A A ( ( t t t t ( (

I U D LA D D D D D D D D D I LA N H N H N H N H A R R AA R E O A V L A L

A I

R F

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T , A O.

N L Y DA 9 3 0 7 0 3 6 0 E A T LA 3 3 6 3 6 3 M T N LA 6 4 N S U A O Y O AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA R R C A I C A 3 V S .A N U OA E R NA 0 1 4 7 T A 1 8 3 3 3 8 1 5 0 I EA 1 1 1 1 1 5 3 6 6 C A 1 - - - - - - - -

EA AY A I C S O H N

O PA ML B C C C M 7 C YA MA TA AN A RA A

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A

A A

YA H AA ) f HA Ro HA Ml i TA /C AA I PA GC0 A GF0 A G( 0 A E 0 J

eu g

FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY (GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES)

The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze green leafy-vegetable samples.

There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis All samples were collected and analyzed. The critical stati;n for this trype of analysis (Sample Station C48) is in the east sector at 4.0 miles from the plant. There are no preoperational data for this pathway.

The 1982 operational concentrations are consistent with previous operational years' concentrations.

The following discrepancy was noted:

-C48 second half Cs-137 LLD was greater than the Technical Specifications required LLD due to the computer being down during the analysis. The actual concentrations were calculated with Nuclear Data firmware and LLD's calculated manually af ter the sample was removed from the system. Data shown is best values for method utilized.

Semiannual Sr-90 Analysis All samples were co!!ected and analyzed. The critical station for this type of analysis is Station C48. The 1982 operational concentrations for Sr-90 were above the LLD for the analysis. No operational events of effluent releases from Crystal River Unit 3 could be linked with these values. The elevated concentrations may be the result of residual fallout from the 1980 weapons tests.

TABLE III-38 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NONITORIMO PROGRAN SUNNARY ,

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCl:ET NO.50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/82-12/31/82 PATHWAY A TYPE 1 NO. A LLD A ALL LOCATIONS A HIGHEST NEAN LOCATION A CONTROL LOCATION ANRR AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA A A A A A A A

A A A A G. L . V R O .' A A A A A A A (PCI/MG) A OANNA A A A 1 4A A A A INGESTION A ANALYSIS A l

A A A A A A A A A, A A A A A A 94-140 A 24.3A P0( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A TM-232 A 13.5A 34.3( 2/ 4)AC47 A 47.4( 1/ 2)A 47.4( 1/ 2)A A A A ( 19.1- 47.4)A A ( 49.4- 49.4)A ( 49.4- 49.+)A A A A A A A A A I-131 A 6.6A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 3 A A up A RA-226 A 16.2A '126.5( 3/ 4)AC47 A 166.0( 1/ 2)A 166.0( 1/ 2)A

'8 A A A ( 58.6- 166.0)A A ( 166.0- 166.0)A ( 166.0- 166.0)A A A A A I A A A 4)A A A A A RU-106 A J7.6A ND( 0/

A A A A A A A

A CS-137 A 15.5A 343.1( 3/ 4)AC48 A 479.8( 2/ 2)A 67.5( 1/ 2)A A A A ( 69.5- 495.7)A A ( 464.0- 495.7)A ( 69.5- 69.5)A A A A A A A A

A 2R-95 A 11.0A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A

A NN-54 A 6.2A NDt 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A i *A 2N-65 A 15.2A ND( 0/ 4)A A A A A A A A A A

' . A A A A A A A A

A N- 40 A 189.1A 3072.0( 4/ 4)AC17 A 4660.0( 2/ 2)A 4660.0( 2/ 2)A A A A ( T47.?-4760.0)A A (4560.0-4760.0)A (4560.0-4760.0)A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A G. L. VEG. A A A A A (PCI/MG) A SR 89/90 A A i FOOD CHAIN A ANALYSIS 4A A A A A A 0 A A A A A A A

, A A A A A A A A SR-90 A 1.22A57.20( 4/ 4)AC48 A70.00( 2/ 2)A44.40( 2/ 2)A A A A (24.00-79.003A A (61.00-79.00)A (24.00-64.803A A A A A A A A

i

l TABLE 1H-39 l

GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pci/kg)

Gamma Analysis Ra 226 all 126.5 4 16.2 C48** 1 16.7 155 3040/C47 C47 1 12.6 166 3040/C47 Th 232 ali 34.3 4 13.5 -- --

C48** -

1 15.3 19.1 836/C47 C47 1 12.1 49.4 836/C47 I131** ali <LLD 4 6.6 <LLD C48** -

2 7.8 <LLD 90/C47 B2140 all <LLD 4 24.3 <LLD C48** -

2 28.5 <LLD 272/C47 Ru 106 all <LLD 4 57.6 <LLD C48** 2 67.4 <LLD 592/C47 Cs 137 all 343 4 15.5 496 C48* -

1 42 496 1266/C47 OD; fined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

CoCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

TABLE ID-39 (Con't)

GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES Sampiing No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (pci/kg) (pci/kg) (pcl/kg) (pel/kg)

Gamma Analysis (Con't)

Zr 95 all <LLD 4 11.0 <LLD -

C48** -

2 12.2 <LLD 125/C47 Mn54 all <LLD 4 6.2 <LLD --

C48** -

2 6.8 <LLD 72.2/C47 Zn 65 all <LLD 4 15.2 <LLD C48** 2 15.1 <LLD 180/C47 K 40 all 3072 4 189 C48** 1 81.9 2020 54166/C47 C47 -

1 86.7 4560 54166/C47 Sr 90 all 57.2 4 1.2 79 -

C48** -

1 1.4 79 1010/C47 l

l

Defined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational i

program or operating station used to calculate limit.

1. Critical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

l l

. _ . . _ _ _. __ _ .___ . --F IGURE -III --

~ ' - '

l

~ -

_5. _ F_00DCIfi1N PATHNAY_',_(GREEN}EhFY VEG8T5BLES)-QCLID'E'~T3 FENDS .

t.-_ - - _._--..-.-- _... .-_ .-- . _-.. . . . . _ . - .

- . . _. . .._ - -. X 40 I

~

10 8 _ . - _ _ . - - - . - _ ___-._ . - - - - - . - - - - - - - - -

U#

10 2

, 9 O Rs 22&

q $ -4 y -- _

Q

.J

, 4, R.s IN r Se 90 10 1 '

'TA>J2

w ._ _ _. _._. .

._1 . _ _ da ._.

t, _ -. . _ .

/ .. . _- . . -.

z, sr

~~ ~ ~ ' - -

[ ~ " - - - ~ ~

/ - ._. ._. .__

% \ ._

~

/ '

c __ .. ..__

~

} M5i3jy _ _ . I 10% . . - - --

,____.r..____._.___..._.. .

_ . _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ . . . ._.N ...._ __ . _ . _ _ _ . _ - . . _ . _ _ _ . _ . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _

. .] . ~ ..._ 4.-.._ _

(

. 1. _ ._I'~-~~~'.__;

~~

._w. ._e* m-_4. w- . er-_.-_ . . _ _..e.

m.,_ ~ g W y w _

1917 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

- 100 -

l l

IV. EXTERNAL RADIATION 1 l

. This category includes measurements of ambient radiation at numerous locations l and frequencies as required by Section 3.2.2 of Environmental Technical Specifications. A brief narrative summary, two tables and a trend plot, is provided to oocument in easily usable form the effects of effluent releases from Crystal River Unit 3 on the surrounding evnironment.

The first table summarizes the data as required by Section 5.6.1.A of Environmental Technical Specifications. The second table provides a comparison of required l

reporting levels to the analytical data as required by Section 5.6.1.C(2). The trend '

plot was developed from the mean of the State DHRS and the University of Florida external radiation data for alllocations from 1977 to 1982.

l

- 101 -

1 1 1

. l l

l l EXTERNAL RADIATION

. The " External Radiation" portion of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (Specification 3.2.3) is split between the University and the State. (See Table I-1.) The University also has a TLD at Sample Station C47 and the State has

- additional TLD's at Sample Stations C04, C40, and C46. Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G are the critical stations in this pathway.

The 1982 data from all TLD stations are consistent with previous operational years' data and preoperational data. Additionally, the critical stations and the control stations of the University also compare very well. However, because the University and the State use different types of TLD's, it is necessary to report their results separately. The higher values associated with Station C26 are attributed to the concentration of phosphate local to the station as well as substrate adjacent to the TLD location.

-102-l i

TABLE IV-1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NONITORING PR00RAN SUNNARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO.50-302 .

CIFRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/82-12/31/02 PATHWAY

TYPE 5 NO.

LLD

ALL LOCATIONS

HIGHEST HEAN LOCATION

CONTROL LOCATION FNRR ttttttttttttttt*****tttttttt****tt******************s****t*********************************ttssettttt; .

2 9 t * * *

AIR SUBMCRSION t EXTERNAL * * * * * *

(MREN/YR)

RADIA110N 1 * * * *

U OF F 1 36* 15.0

50.( 36/ 36)*C47

70.( 4/ Alt 51.( 24/ 24)t 0

* * ( 20.- 125.)* * ( 50.- 125.)* ( 20.- 125.)?

PATHWAY t TYPE 1 t!D .

L t. D t ALL LOCATIONS

HIONEST MEAN LOCATION

CONTROL LOCATION tNf:P ty' tter**tttt**ttttttttttt**tf**tt*********t**tttt*******ttttt***t****************tt**tttttt*tttest

t * *

t AIR SUPHERSION t EXTERNAL t * *

8. t (HREM/YR)

RADIATION * * * * *

STATE 1 29* 20.0

53.( 28/ 28)*C26

154.( 4/ 4)* 53.(

28/ 283r 0 1

* ( 29.- 163.)* * ( 145.- 163.)* ( 29.- 163.11

>=

O W

9 S

e

TABLE IV-2 EXTERNAL RADIATION Sampling No. of Highest Limit

Parameter Location Mean Samples LLD Single Value Location (mrem /yr) (mrem /yr) (mrem /yr) (mrem /yr)

External Radiation (U of F) all 50 36 15 Cl44** 1 15 72 770 Preop C14M * * --

1 15 81 770 Preop C14 G *

1 15 58 770 Preop cD; fined as either (1) 10 times the upper 95 percentile confidence value from preoperational program, or (2) 10 times the upper 95 percentile value from operating stations outside the plant's influence, whichever is smaller. The location associated with the limit designates preoperational program or operating station used to calculate limit.

ocCritical Pathway Sample Station and critical radionuclides.

-104-

4.+

no

...e _ _ _ ... _.

. FIGURE-IV-1

. . i __ - . .

--- - ~

-l ~ -

EXTERNAI RlDIATION~ TRENDS

(, ,

w .__ . . _ _ . . . _ _. . - _ ._ _ _

6 ssoo . . _ . . .- . _ _ _ . _ . . -- _ .- ._

t_ _ __ _ _ . . . _ - _ . _ _ . _ . _ _

100

(

u _ . .

N ._ - - . -

e._

p . _ i _ _.

E

, y __. _ -

L_ _ . _ . . . _ _ . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ .

._ _ . ..s , __ .. _ . _ _ _ _ _ .

LD_ . . - . _ . . _ - _ . . .

E- ~

t_

O state of MA -DNAtr _ .. _ _ _ _ . . _ .

~

7 _ ._ .

E_ _ A 14m'a#f. y d M*A L ._ .

3

. __ . .. ._. _ . ____._z_ . _ .

7 J __ :..._____..

__. ._. - _ . _- - ', ..a.___.. _

.s _

~

_.~_~L~~~.~.".T._~M_"~' .: ~._.

( ~

~. . -_ .

-__4.-_.-..____.

_.~'^.._]:.'.~_T.:..__..* 9

~

...--.u _ .i._w_m..

. . . _ _ _ .. _ _ . ..._ ....._.._... _ ,._. . __ _ ._ _ .. _ ._ .____.__.. i . _.__ .. . . _ ._ .

.___w__....

. s.. .._ a_ ___ .. ___.

, ! Z l _

1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

- 105 -

ML20024A397

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML20024A397

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search