ML20012B731
| ML20012B731 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | La Crosse File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1989 |
| From: | Berg W DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE |
| To: | Davis A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| LAC-12899, NUDOCS 9003160184 | |
| Download: ML20012B731 (76) | |
Text
_ _ _....
cw An
.i-4
-k-
-, g.
i.
p DA/RYLAND COOPERATIVE. : 00eAs7 ave.so.. e.o.Boxeir. LActiosse wisconsiws400a.0eir
.. (808)788 4000 FAX NO. (808) 7674420 -
WILUAM L. BERO February 26, 1990 General Managet -
In reply, please refer to LAC-12899 DOCKET NO. 50-409 Mr. A..Bert Davis, Regional Administrator
.U.'_S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Read Glen Ellyn, IL-60137
Dear Mr. Davis:
SUBJECT:
Dairyland Power Cooperative
.La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor (LACBWR)
LPossession-Only License No. DPR-45 Radioactive Effluent Report and Radiological Environmental' Monitoring Report For the Period January 1 throuah Decentiar 31, 1989
REFERENCES:
-(1).NRC Letter, Keppler to Linder, dated August 12, 1983, Inspection Report 50-409/83-10 (DRMSP)
(2) LACBWR Technical Specifications 6.9.3.a and 6.9.3.b In accordance with 10 CFR 50.36a(a)(2), this letter serves to transmit to'you the Radioactive Effluent Report and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for the La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor (LACBWR) for the--
period January 1 through December 31, 1989.
If you have any questions, please contact us.
+
Sincerely, DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE hM William L. Berg, Gen al Manager WLB:LLN dhtsks Enclosures cc - Mr. James M. Taylor (10 copies)
Document Control De n (3 copies)
NRC Project Manager (P. Erickson)
'D. Sherman, ANI Library
//
9003160184 891231 E
[ K, PDR ADOCK 05000409 R
PNU
(
2
&) ~
.7,' '
1 o. =.
.=
l f
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT AND RADI0 LOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT
'o FOR THE LA CROSSE BOILING WATER REACTOR (JANUARY 1, 1989 TO DECEMBER 31, 1989)-
DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE 4
Docket No. 50-409 s.
s i
immi um.-
imisinii is-ii-im
~
g' it. t.
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION~
TITLE PAGE A.
Radioactive Effluent Report Introduction 1
1.0 Regulatory Limits 2
2.0 ~
Maximum Permissible Concentration 4
3.0 Average Energy 4
'4.0-
' Analytical Methods 4
.S.0 Batch Releases 6
- 6. 0 '
Abnormal Releases 7
7.0 Estimated Total Analytical Error 7~
8.0 Offsite Dose Calculation Summary.
'and Conclusions 15 e
9.0 Meteorological Frequency Distribution 16 J
by Stability Class
.B.,
Environmental Report Introduction 25 L
1.0 Sample Collection 26 1
2.0 Results of the 1989 Radio-Environmental Monitoring Survey 28 i
3.0 Conclusions 31 4
4.0 Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results 32 J
~
l 1
i i
i i
i REM j
l l
l
o TABLES.
TABLE NO.
TITLE PAGE 1A Effluent and Waste Disposal Gaseous Ef fluent Release Summaries 8
1B Gaseous Effluents - Elevated Release 9
2A Liquid Release Summary 11
~2B Liquid Effluents 12 3
Solid Waste and Irradiated Fuel
-Shipments 13 4
Percentage Wind Frequency Distribution by 17.
Pasquill Stability Class 5
Sample Frequency and' Analysis of.
Radio-Environmental Samples 37 6
Permanent Environmental Monitoring Station Locations 38 7
Environmental TLD Locations 39 8
Radio-Environmental Samples Collected January-December 1988 40 i.
9 Quarterly TLD Measurements in the LACBWR Vicinity 41 10 Weekly Beta Air Particulates in the LACBWR Vicinity 43 v
11-Air Particulate Composite Results 47 12 Results of Analysis of Mississippi l
l River Water in the Vicinity of LACBWR 59 l
13 Results of Analysis of Mississippi River Sediment in the Vicinity of LACBWR 65 i
L.
1; l
11 REM l
l c..-
3 i
w
?
r TABLES - (cont'd)._
)
. TABLE NOI TITLE PAGE 14 Results of Analysis of Milk Samples in the Vicinity of LACBWR 66 15, Fish Samples Activity in the Vicinity of LACBWR 68 16.
Vegetation Samples Activity in.the Vicinity of LACBWR 70 i
l FIGURES
'NO.
~ TITLE PAGE-FIGURE 1 LACBWR Property Map 33 FIGURE 2 Permanent Environmental Monitoring Station Location 34 -
FIGURE 3.
LACBWR Environmental Dose Assessment
' Locations-35-FIGURE 4 LACBWR Environmental Dose Assessment Locations 36.
'I 1
s til REM
_-y 7
i?
- s..
,s is l
4,
}' ;
- \\
h :;
- s?
^
i L..
L.. -
l 1
'.*':-. 3 i
L
~
5 1
fs'-
n L
t
?
i
.i t
7 t
SECTION A 4
i s
'.r 1
s RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT r,
I L
l N-Ie l.-
.t 6;
i-i l'
r t
l h
\\
.=
INTRODUCTION:
The La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor (LACBWR), also known as Genoa Station No. 2, is' located'on the east bank of the Mississippi River near Genoa, Vernon County, Wisconsin. The plant was designed and constructed by the Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company. It was completed in 1967 and had a generation capacity of 50 MW (165 MW(th)). The reactor is owned by Dairyland Power Cooperative (DPC).
The reactor went critical in July 1967 and first contributed electricity to DPC's system in April 1968. 'After completing full power tests in August 1969. the plant operated between _60% and 100% full power,- with the exception of plant shutdowns for maintenance and repair.
In April of 1987 plant operation was ceased. The reactor is presently e
defueled and work is' progressing to place the plant into a SAFSTOR mode.
In-x
- August of 1987 a possession-only license was received.
i In accordance with LACBWR Technical Specifications 6.9.3.a & 6.9.3.b and in compliance with 10 CFR 50.36a(a)(2), this document is the Radioactive Effluent Report for the period January 1 through December 31, 1989.
.g.
'is.
I 3
b-.
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT (Supplemental Information)
FACILITY: Lacrosse Boilina Water Reactor LICENSEES-DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE DOCKET NO. 50-409 :
'l.
-REGULATORY LIMITS J
a..
Gaseous Effluent Release Limits:
LACBWR's Technical Specifications for gaseous effluent. releases of
. radioactive material limit the release rates of the sum of_the
-individual radionuclides, in Curies per second, so that the dose rates to members of the public beyond the Effluent Release Boundary do not exceed 500 mrem / year to the whole body, 3000 mrem / year to the skin from noble gases, and 1500 mrem / year to a c'ritical organ from H-3, 1-131/133 and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days.
I Also, in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I, the Technical Specifications for gaseous effluent radioactive material limit the air dose to a member of the public from noble gases in areas beyond the Effluent Release Boundary to less than 5 mrad gamma and 10 mrad beta per
. calendar quarter, and less than 10 mrad gamma and 20 mrad beta per calendar year.,The dose limits'from H-3, I-131/133 and particulates with half lives greater than 8 days are less.than 7.5 mrem per calendar quarter, and less than 15 mrem per calendar year to any organ.
Cumulative dose contributions from gaseous effluent releases are determined in accordance with the LACBWR Offsite Dose Calculations Manual.
2-
..)
=.:
4 b.-
Liquid Efflutnt ReleA** Limits:
LACBWR's Technical Specifications limits for liquid effluent
' releases are limited to those concentrations of individual radionuclides such that the diluted discharge does not exceed 1 MPC in a 168-hour week -
averaged over the calendar year. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration is limited to a total activity concentration of 2 x 10 pCi/ml.
For alpha emitting radionuclidos, the concentration _is limited-to a total activity concentration.of 4.9 x 10** pCi/ml, based upon an actual alpha emitting radionuclide analysis performed on a representative water sample. The values reported in tables 2A and 2B, Liquid Effluents, are based on dilution with the combination of LACBWR' and Genoa Station No. 3 condenser cooling water flow prior to discharge to the Mississippi River. No credit is taken for further dilution in the mixing-zone of the Mississippi River.
Also, in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I, the dose' commitment to a member of the public from radioactive materials _ released in liquid effluents to areas beyond the Effluent Releas'e Boundary are limited'to
-less than 1.5 mrem whole body and 5.0 mrem organ dose per. calendar quarter, and less than 3.0 mrem whole body and 10 mrem organ dose per.
calendar year via the critical ingestion pathway.
Cumulative quarterly and annual dose contributions from liquid ef fluent releases are detetuined for the adult fish ingestion pathway in accordance with the LACBWR Offsite Dos,e Calculation Manual. l
l i
c.
Solid Radioactive Waste All solid radioactive wastes are handled in accordance with-a q
Process Control Program as defined by LACBWR procedures in order to assure that all-applicable transportation and burial site disposal l
requirements are met.
2.-
MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATION (MPC) 1 The MPC used to calculate permissible release rates are obtained from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B. Tables I and II.-
In addition, the following values are used:
)
Tritium in Water = 3 x 10 3 pCi/ml.
Tritium in Air
= 2 x 10*7 pCi/cc.
-1 3.
AVERAGE ENERGY j
The release rate limits for LACBWR are not based on. average energy.
-l 4.
ANALYTICAL METHODS f
a,
, Liquid Effluents Liquid effluent measurements for gross radioactivity are performed'.
by Go-Li gamma isotopic analysis of a representative sample from each tank discharged. A composite sample is created by collecting representative aliquots of each sample from each tank batch discharged, and is analyzed monthly for Tritium, and quarterly for Iron-55 and Strontium 89 & 90.
The iron and radiostrontiums are analyzed by a contractor. In addition, each batch discharged tank is analyzed for alpha activity concentration.
4-f.:- [
n g
'e
- b.
Airborne Particulates Airborne particulate releases are determined by Go-Li gamma isotopic analysis. This analysis is performed by analyzing a glass fiber filter paper taken from the stack monitor (Eberline SPING) which continuously isokinetically samples and monitors the stack effluent.
This filter is changed and analyzed on an approximate weekly basis and analyzed within 7 days after removal. This filter is also analyzed for alpha activity. A quarterly composite of these filters is sent to a contractor for Sr 89 and 90 analysis.
c.-
Radioiodines Radioiodine releases are determined by Ge-Li gamma analysis of a TEDA impregnated activated charcoal cartridge taken from the stack
. monitor which continuously isokinetically samples and monitors the stack effluent. This charcoal cartridge is changed approximately weekly and analyzed within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> after removal. Since the plant shutdown in April 1987, the I-131/I-133 have decayed completely to stable elements.
e d.
Fission and Activation Gases The gaseous releases converted into concentration (pCi/cc) are.
continuously sampled from the stack release flow by two stack monitors, which are inline monitors. These gas concentrations (pci/cc) are averaged by the monitors microprocessor and flowrate/ pressure compen-sated to obtain the daily gaseous release of the plant. Since the plant shutdown in April 1987, gaseous releases have been i;nmeasurable. All fission gases except Kr-85 have decayed completely to stable elements......
=.
',.1 e.:, Tritium
/
Tritium releases are determined by taking a grab sample of the stack atmosphere at the effluent of the stack monitor. Tritium, as tritiated _ water, is removed from the sample stream by condensation, using a cold trap containing an organic compound and dry ice. The
-condensed water vapor is then distilled and the distillate is analyzed for H-3 concentration, pCi/ce, by internal liquid scintillation spectrophotometry and the results are expressed in terms of tritium release rates. The tritium grab samples are obtained on at least a once/ month basis unless the upper reactor cavity is flooded, at which time the sampling frequency is increased to at least once per 7 days.-
5.
BATCH RELEASES a.
Airborne All airborne' effluent releases at LACBWR are from a single Continuous-Elevated Release Point.
b.- ' Liquid All liquid effluent releases at LACBWR are batch releases. This.is sununarized as follows:............. _ _ _
' :w i
n (1) Number of Batch Releases:
39 (2) Total Time. Period for Batch Releases:
274.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> i
'(3) Maximum Time Period for a Batch Release:
18.4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> m
(4) Average Time Period for Batch Releases: 7.3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> E
(5) Minimum Time Period for a Batch Release: 3.25 hours2.893519e-4 days <br />0.00694 hours <br />4.133598e-5 weeks <br />9.5125e-6 months <br /> 1
(6) Average Stream Flow Rate During Periods of Release of Effluent into a Flowing Stream
'21,600 ft /sec 8
l.-
l 6..
ABNORMAL RELEASES L
There were no abnormal releases of radioactivity in plant effluents as l-I summarized as follows:
l a.
Llauid l
(1) Number of Releases: None (2) Total Activity Released: N/A
'b.-
Gaseous (1) Number of Releases: None l
l L
(2) Total Activity Released: N/A 1
7.
ESTIMATED TOTAL ANALYTICAL ERROR The reported analytical results contain'the following estimated errors:
Counting Error t 1 Standard Deviation 5
' Sampling Volume Error i 5%.
The lower limits of detection (LLD) are expressed in terms of a 4.66 o as defined in Technical Specifications.
i
~.1
]
TABLE 1A EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT - 1989-GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES
)
?
l l UNIT
! OTR
! OTR
! OTR ! OTR ! TOTAL l A.
FISSION & ACTIVATION GASES l 1. TOTAL RELEASE l
l l
l l
l 2
l Ci O.00 !
0.00 !
0.00 ' O.00 1 0.00 l l 2. AVERAGE RELEASE RATE l-l l
l l
FOR PERIOD ~
! uCi/See !
W B.
IODINE I-131 l 1. TOTAL IODINE-131 l
l j
j j
l l
l Ci 0.00 O.00 ' O.00 ' -0.00 ! 0.00 l l 2. AVERAGE RELEASE RATE j l
l l
l FOR PERIOD
! uCi/See !
l l
+
C.-'PARTICULATES l 1. PARTICULATES W/ HALF-l l
l l
l l
LIVES > 8 DAYS Ci
'7.88E-6"3.40E-8'2.28E-7!4.87E-6 1.30E-5l
- 2. AVERAGE RELEASE RATE l
i e
FOR PI:RIOD
! 901/Sec ' 1.00E-6i4.33E-9' 2,89E-8' 6.21E-7l l 3. GROSS ALPHA l
i l
l
^
RADI0 ACTIVITY Ci-
'9.00E-8!
0.00 14.30E-8 9.93E-8l 4
D.
TRITIUM l
l 1. TOTAL RELEASE.
l_
l _
l-l l
-l l
l Ci
!4.41E-1!2.21E-1!2.55E-1!1.40E-1! 1.06 l l 2. AVERAGE RELEASE-RATE l l
l l_
j l
l
-FOR PERIOD
! uC1/See !5.67E-2!2.81E-2!3.21E-2!1'.78E-2l E.
PERCENTAGE OF (APPENDIX I) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION LIMITS 1.
NOBLE GAS RELEASE
! QTR
l GAMMA 0.00 !
0.00 !
0.00 !
0.00 1 0.00 l l BETA 0.00 !
0.00 !
0.00 !
0.00 1 0.00 l 2.
1-131. I-133. H-3, AND ALL RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM WITH HALF-LIVES GREATER THAN 8 DAYS l
! OTR
! OTR l QTR QTR
! YEARLY l l HIGHEST ORGAN 11.67E-2!8.20E-3!9.49E-3!5.24E-3!1.98E-2l
- j. 1 i
g
.=
TABLE IB
_ EIFLUDTP AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT - 1989 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - ELEVATED RELEASE CONTINUOUS HODE e
.j NUCLIDES RELEASED
! UNIT
! QTR
! OTR
! OTR
! QTR ! TOTAL l 3
1.
FISSION GASES l
Ci L
l KRYP M -85M l
Ci l
KRYPTON-87 Ci l
l KRYPTON-88 Ci l
l l
XENON-133-Ci l
l XENON-135 Ci l
l XENON-135M Ci l
l XENON-138 Ci l
l KR-89 Ci l
,l XE-133M Ci l
- r l
XE-131M Ci l
l.
l XE-137 Ci l
l AR-41 l
Ci
.l Ci l
l-l Ci l
l TOTAL FOR PERIOD Ci O.00
! 0.00 l- 0.00 0.00 ! 0.00 l
t 2.
10 DINES I-l 10 DINE-131 Ci l
l l
10 DINE-133 Ci l
l IODINE-135 Ci=
l l
TOTAL FOR PERIOD i.
Ci
! 0.00 0.00
! 0.00 0.00 l - 0.00 l
'3.
(SEE FOLLOWING PAGE FOR PARTICULATES.)
_9
,c ei 4
TABLE IB - EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT - 1989 t-GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - ELEVATED RELEASE - (cont'd)
CONTINUOUS HODE l NUCLIDES RELEASED
! UNIT
! QTR
! TOTAL l l
h 3.
PARTICULATES 0.00 l l
l 1
j STRONTIUM-89 Ci 0.00 l l
STRONTIUM-90 Ci O.00 l l
CESIUM-134 Ci 11.86E-6' 5.38E-6l l
CESIUM-137 Ci l 3.55E-6i 3.40E-8 0.00 j l
BARIUM-LANTHANUM-140 :
Ci
! 0.00 l l
-l CO-57 l
Ci O.00 '-
l CO-58 t-Ci "1.40E-7L3.01E-6 7.19E-6 p
j CO-60 1
C1 4.04E-6'-
0.00,
r l
CE-144 Ci l
0.00 '
I l
CF.-141 Ci O.00 '
l j
CR-51 Ci 3.78E-7l 8.80E-89 l
.NN-54 Ci 2.90E-7L 0.00 l l
j FE-59 C1 0.00 l l
l-ZN-65 Ci O.00 '
1 l
l ZR-95 Ci 0.00 ',
l NB-95 Ci 0.00 W-j RU-RH-106
{
Ci 0.00 l l
RU-103 l
Ci l
1 Ci l
l Ci l
i i
t 0
l Ci l
I t
l_
l t
Ci 1
l l
l Ci l
l
8
~
e a
TABLE 2A H
EFF1UENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT - 1989 i
1.IOUID EFFLUENTS - SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES l
! UNIT
! OTR
! OTR
! QTR
! OTR
! TOTAL l L
A.
FISSION & ACTIVATION PRODUCTS l 1. TOTAL RELEASE (NOT INCL l l
j.
l l
l TRITIUM. GASES. ALPRA) '
Ci
!6.01E-2' 4.34E-2!3.26E-213.24E-2' 1.69E-1l l 2. AVERAGE DILUTED CONCEN-l l
j j
l TRATION DURING PERIOD l uct/mi !5.62E-8!S.14E-8!1.16E-8!!.41E-8l B.
TRITIUM l 1. TOTAL RELEASE j
j j
j j
l l
' C1 1.12 17.20E-1!5.97E-l'3.48E-1" 2.79 l l
l 2. AVERAGE DILUTED CONCEN-;
j l
l 1
l TRATION DURING PERIOD l uC1/ml ll.05E 8.54E-7!2.12E-7! 1.51E-7 L r
C.
DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES l 1. TOTAL RELEASE l'
l l
,l l
l l
l Ci O.00 !
0.00 !
0.00 !
0.00 0.00 l l 2. AVERAGE DILUTED CONCEN,
l l
l l
TRATION DURING PERIOD luci/mi l
D.
GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY l 1. TOTAL RELEASE l
l l
l l
l l
l
! Ci
!5.92E-5!4.00E-5!2.03E-5!1.20E-4!2.40E-4j,
lE. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED l l
l l
j j
l l
(PRIOR TO DILUTION)
! Liters-!1.17ES !1.12E5 11.53E5 11.27ES !5.09ES j lF. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER l l
l l
l l
-l
~
-l USED DURING PERIOD
! Liters 11.07E9 !8.44E8 12.82E9 12.30E9 !7.03E9 l G. PERCENTAGE OF (APPENDIX I) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION LIMITS FOR LIQUID RELEASES
! OTR
! QTR
! YEARLY l l HIGHEST ORGAN
! 0.40
! 0.26
! 0.078 l 0.155 ! 0.45 l
l WHOLE BODY
! 0.89
! 0.57
! 0.17
! 0.341 l 0.98 l
?
TABLE 2B EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT - 1989 LIQUID EFFLUENTS j NUCLIDES RELEASED
! UNIT ! OUARTER OUARTER QUARTER
! OUARTER l
l STRONTIUM-89
! Ci 1.27E-4
- 5.46E-5 l
t l STRONTIUM-90
! Ci t 3.05E-4
' 2.91E-4 1.73E-4 1.94E-4 l CESIUM-134
! Ci
! 1.80E-4 5.27E-5 1.21E-5
' 8.53E-5 l
! Ci
? 1.37E-2 6.89E-3 5.09E-3
' 9.60E-3 l
l l IODINE-131
! Ci i
l l COBALT-58
! Ci l COBALT-60
! Ci
" 2.93E-2
, 2.38E-2 2.00E-2
! 1.43E-2 l
l l IRON-59 Ci
?
?-
3.70E-5 l
! ZINC-65 Ci l MANGANESE-54
! C1 2.54E-3 1.07E-3 2.17E-3 7.15E,4,__,, '
. l CHROMIUM-51
! Ci l ZIRCONIUM-NIOBIUM-95 Ci l MOLYBDENUM-99 Ci l
l TECHNETIUM-99M Ci t
l_ BARIUM-LANTHANUM-140 Ci l-l CERIUM-141
- Ci g
l CE-144 Cl 7.44E-5 j CO-57 Ci
' 1.50E-5 l I-133
- C1 l
l I-135
! Ci l
j NP-239
! Ci
'l j RU-103
! Ci l
' RU-RH-105
! Ci l
- RU-RH-106
! Ci l
ll SR-91
! Ci I
l SR-92
! Ci l
! 3.90E-5 l
' AG-110M
! Ci
! 9.49E-5 l FE-55
! Ci
! 1.39E-2 1.13E-2 4.99E-3 ! 7.38E-3 l
! 3.90E-5 l-AM-241.
Ci l
Ci l
l j
Ci l
l
! Ci l
i i
i l TOTAL FOR PERIOD (ABOVE)! Ci
! 6.01E-2
! 4.34E-2 3.26E-2 ! 3.24E-2 l
l j XENON-133
! Ci l
l l XENON-135
! Ci l XE-131M
! Ci l
l XE-133M
! Ci l
l KR-85M l Ci l
l YR-87
! Ci l
l l Ci l
l
! Ci
! t
~
.i
=.
J r.
TABLE 3 i
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT - 1989 1
SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS
.I A.
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (NOT IRRADIATED FUEL) l l 6-MONTH ll 6-MONTH l l
) 1. TYPE OF WASTE
! UNIT ! PERIOD PERIOD ! TOTAL l 3
- a. SPENT RESINS, FILTER SLUDGES, j m 4.62 4.62 l l
EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS. ETC.
Ci
- 3.19El 3.19El l l
- b. DRY COMPRESSIBLE WASTE, 3
2.12 2.12 l i.m 4
l CONTAMINATED EQUIPMENT. ETC.
Ci
! 2.23E-1 2.23E-1l j.
- c. IRRADIATED COMPONENTS, a s i
. l CONTROL RODS. ETC.
Ci l
- d. OTHER (DESCRIBE) m 3 l
Ci 1
2.
ESTIMATE OF MAJOR NUCLIDE COMPOSITION l 6-MONTH ! 6-MONTH l (BY TYPE OF WASTE) l PERCENT! PERIOD PERIOD l 9
a.
" 55.73 ' 1.78E1 Cs-137 9.42 3.01
'5.32E-3' 1.70E-3 '
' 1.31E-2' 4.17E-3 '
Fe-55 l 25.17 8.04 Ni-59
'5.70E-2' 1.82E-2 Ni-63 5.01 1.60 Sr-90 5.89E-1; 1.88E-1 Tc-99 6.11E-5l. 1.93E-5 I-129
': 2.94E-3 ! 9. 38E-4 '
l U-235 2.45E-6' 7.81E-7 !
l U-238 2.07E-6 6.60E-7 !
l Pu-239/240
,4.48E-3 1.43E-3 !
l Am-241
'3.22E-3' 1.03E-3 l
Cm-243/244 1.41E-3 4.51E-4 l
Pu-238 7.98E-3, 2.44E-3 l
-Pu-241
!3.57E-1! 1.14E-1 Cm-242
!1.80E-2! 5.76E-3 l
b.
Co-60 43.79 !
! 9.77E-2 l Cs-137 2.09 !
! 4.66E-3 l Mn-54 1.83 !
! 4.08E-3 l Fe-55
! 45.09 !
! 1.01E-1 l Ni-63 6.84 !
! 1.53E-2 l Pu-241
!3.60E-1!
! 8.03E-4 l l.
t y.
TABLE 3 - (cont'd) 1 EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT - 1989 Sol.ID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS i
- 3. SOLID WASTE DISPOSITION 1
NO. OF SHIPMENTS HODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION 1
Scle Use Barnwell S.C.
4 Sole Use (Quadrox) Oak Ridge, TN i
B.
IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS (DISPOSITION)
NO. OF SHIPMENTS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION I
6 i
t,
4 ys
8.
OFFSITE DOSE CA1,CULATIONS
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS:
a.
Gaseous Effluent Releases The maximum quarterly offsite gamma dose due to noble gases was 0.00 mrad. The cumu'lative 1989 annual offsite gamma dose due to noble gases was 0.00 mrad.
The maximum quarterly offsite beta dose due to noble gases was
[
t 0.00 mrad. The cumulative 1989 annual offsite beta dose due to noble f
i gases was 0.00 mrad.
The maximum quarterly offsite dose to any organ from the release of 1-131. I-133. H-3 and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days was approximately 1.25E-3 mRom. The cumulative 1989 annual maximum organ dose frot; these radionuclides was approximately 2.97E-3 mRes.
The highest historical monthly and annual, average X/Q's for the period 1985-1987 for the worst case offsite receptor location, in accordance with the ODCM, were used to calculate these offsite dose
- values, i
l b.
Liquid Effluent Releases The maximum quarterly organ dose from liquid releases was approximately 0.02 mrem. The maximum cumulative 1989 annual organ dose was approximately 0.05 mrem. The maximum quarterly whole body dose for i
liquid releases was approximately 0.01 mrem, and the cumulative 1989 t
annual whole body dose was approximately 0.03 mrem.
c.
Conclusion l.
All calculated offsite doses were below Technical Specification l
limits.
RER -
I j
t.
i i
9.
METEORO1DGICAL FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION BY STABILITY CLASS i
The following Table 4, pages 17 thru 24. contains the joint wind frequency data valid for LACBWR stack releass.s. This wind data is collected 1
from a mounted boom projecting out near the top of the vent stack. The i
stability determination is based upon the temperature difference between the i
10m surface meteorological tower and the 100m meteorological boom. The staSility class is then ascribed following the method outlined in Reg. Guide t
1.23.
l e
i I
1 i
l t
l l
l l
l 1
~ ~
PASEs..
1 RUN DATE:
1-25-96 DPC ENTIE0fMffAL unrTTrymTs'4"STETEN PERCENTBGE StIND FREQUENCY HISTIBUEIDE 3Y BAEOUILL S?naTrTrir CLASS
_====e-___
==e
___ =-
.eeee seeeeeee...
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee==_====_=eee:========_-
e e
8m8m ET1.2. IEEES 11 SITE EMER: LACBI8Ei-STACK FERIOD OF RECOED: E1-91489 TE M 12-31-89 NYN STRETT. TTY ZEB M TW W SAROAD Juo 51362EEE4 e
- =__=e==___
e_
_ =:=-
_==
... e e eeeeeee esesee ee eeee ess eesseee e e = = = = = = = = e = _ = = = = = = =.
M 8'm'**'t WI M SPEED (M E)
DIRECTION E 4-7 S-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TUTEL EB M
==ee==_
=_ =-
==__==-
=====-
eee.
eee....eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee=_======e==_
e e
N E.EE E.96 E.11 E.21 E.11 E.91 E.43 15.7 NEE E.96 E.EE E.EE E.M R.M E.M E.M E.8 EE E.EE K.EE E.99 E.BB E.M K.99 E.M E.E EEE E.EW E.EE E.M E.91 E.M E.M E.91 16.7 E
E.EE E.E1 E.EE W.EE E.M G.M K.81 5.E ESE E.EE E.EE E.EE E.EE E.EE E.M E.M K.E
- =
SE E.98 E.EE E.El E.81 E.EE E.M 9.32 11.8 SSE E.EE 1.96 K.EE E.EE E.EE R.EE 3.M E.3 S
E.EE E.El E.EW E.95 E.M E.M E.06 14.9 a
SBw 9.99 E.El E.M7 E.E2 E.E5 R.M R.15 13.4 SW E.EE E.El E.91 E.EE E.M R.M E.62 7.2 HEW E.EE E.EW E.EW E.M E.M W.M R.M E.E w
E.EE E.m E.EE E.M E.M E.M E.M E.E NR>t E.EE E.9S E.M E.EE E.M E.M E.M E.R 9 99 E.96 E.EE E.99 E.91 9.9V E.M R.91 IE.8 RRet E.9E 9.96 E.94 m.95 E.97 E.M E.15 16.3 vAninnt.2 E.g6 s E.EW g.EE E.M
- E.M B.M B.M R.E
=====__
.=====_
---_ ^==-
eseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee========ee==
e=- -
I PERCENT TOTAL E.EE E.95 E.23 E.36 E.22 E.El E.EE AVG SPEED E.E 6.7 9.8 15.3 21.E 24.7 14.9 EvamTT.Tvf.
EtB PERCENTAGE FIEQUENCY OF 8*mT.anTDISTRIBUTED. anryFE WTE 11erymanettv 1masvanta VALID READINGS ~=
475 vant.2 17 -
FBSE:
2*
RUN DATE:
1-25-9E DPC ENTIROKENTAL HDETTnRIss;sSYSTM PERCENTRGE WIND FREQUEBCY DISTIB1PFION BY PASOUILL STBSTTTTY CLASS e==__========___ _===
- ===
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeseeeeeeeeeeeee===_ _
e SITE IWutEn IACBWR STACK PERIOD OF REORD: 91-EleS9 TEN 12-31-89 PaanUILL Class BJ.
- SAROAD 30 51362#E94
's ST1BTITTY IHrsgemmuMrarrey-nELTa TEW 8mrMEmmTEEE WEEETBELE.
e
_======_.
=
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesseeeeeeeeeeees=========e.======_=e======
==--_
WIND SPEED (NFE)
FEREEurr. WEMbSE DIRECTION 3 4-1 8-12 13-13 19-24
> 24 TUTEL BFEED eeeeee..eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee=========e_========e===__==eee===========___=====e -
--======.
e e
B E.EE Ea95 E.21 E.16 E.14 6.94 9.66 13.9 NEE E.CC E.H E.EE 9.90 E.96 6.96 B.96 E.6 ME E.EE E.El B.81 E.M W.9E E.96 E.82 1.9 ENE E.EE E.EE E.96 E.M 6.96 E.96 E.90 9.9 E
E.EE E.H E.86 6.01 6.96 S.96 E.11 13.9 ESE E.EE E.H E.96 6.96 B.96 E.9W E.H E.E SE 6.EE E.EE S.E2 6.91 W.96 E.96 E.94 11.8 SSE E.EC E.91 E.81 E.99 E.92 H.96 E.13 14.9 S
E.EE R.91 E.12 W.25 9.61 9.96 E.44 14.7 SSN K.H E.95 E.94 0.99 6.99 E.M B.21 14.9 SW E.EE E.82 E.E6 E.96 6.81 6.EW K.99 16.8 MSw E.gE E.99 g.EE E.EE R.H B.96 E.96 E.6 W
E.EE E.99 E.E1 S.96 6.H 6.N R.01 E.8 Hnnt E.EE 6.EE E.EC E.96 E.91 E.BB E.91 21.2 s
nt E.51 E.EE g.E2 9.95 B.62 W.M B.11 14.1 nnw E.Eg 2.E5 g.gs E.95 8.01 E.96 E.2E 16.8 VAnTamLE g.gf 3.3E g.gE g.Rg
-gN g.N g.N g.g e
e eeeeeeeeeeeeeoseeeeeeeeeeeeeeee=========e=_
=
===e:
=====e==-_
-=
^ _======
====-
PERCENT TOTAL E.61 R.2E E.66 6.16 B.39 E.94 1.99 AVG SPEED 3.1 6.4 9.9 15.2 2E.7 25.1 13.7 s
sTamTT. TTY e 3.5 PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY OF CALMSYDISTRIBUTED ABOTE WITE N Y E N Tn3Eg VALID READIDGE =
113 e
18 -
.. +- -
u~-o-
- 2..
~.
m 70sRe.
3 DPC ENFlanssumTAk unstrgDRIBBNSYSTM RUN DATE:
1-25-98 PERCERThGE WIND FERDUEEE:Y DISTIIstION ET SSSOUIIJ. STBSTtTw Class
- ::==
_:==
eeeeeooe eeeeeeee-:_-
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesseeeeeeeeeeesseeeeeeeeeeeeeeo.ooeese= _:::==:eeee e
SITE MhaER: LACBNR STBCK PERIOD OF ME9ED: #1-K1999 T M 12-31-89 PRBGEILL 1"tama C1 3TasTtTTY Im m m. Tm stTussyLY -
e SAROAD E0 $1362X984
's e
- =
re_--
2 2 - _ o eo : - _ _ ^:-__ ^=::==-
^
^=
_:=
e eeeesseseeeeee=======see::======e===_:===:e::-
=
p anrsumanE WIND SPEED (IWg)
DIRECTION
- -3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTh BrEIN
- --==:_-__ _ :::=.
eeeeeeeeee se eeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee e_:-_::::=s;:==:
- e:
N E.EE E.35 E.6E 9.41 0.19 K.62 1.51 12.6 MEE B.9E E.91 E.96 B.BB E.9B 9.99 6.9%
6.1 EE K.91 9.96 6.95 9.M B.BB E.M B.96 S.2 ERE K.BW 9.98 9.91 6.M R.M R.M 9.91 12.3 E
6.66 E.96 K.91 3.06
~9.98 E.M 9.91 8.2 ESE K.90 9.92 B.82 B.M B.00 W.M B.05 8.3 SE K.99 9.06 6.98 8.99 9.96 E.M B.13 11.8 SSE E.90 9.86 S.11 9.25 B.99 R.M B.44 15.5 5
9.55 f.15 f.SF f.39 5.16 8.M 1.11 12.5 SSW E.BR B.98 E.95 B.13 E.82 6.M B.28 12.1 SW E.91 E.92 6.95 9.01 9.96 9.M E.09 8.8 wSW E.90 9.90 E.62 6.M 1.06 9.M 9.92 11.1 w
R.9E K.96 6.9E E.95 B.M B.M B.13 11.1
- ~
Snnt 9.96 9.81 E.99 E.92 B.99 R.BB E.18 13.6 M89 E.BW E.E4 6.15 9.39 9.94 B.M R.61 13.9 ENIt S.Sf f.16 E.15 K.32 K.13 f.96 S.92 14.4 YAR7ABLE K.96 s.
R.99 9.96 B.96 B.90 K.M B.9E 9.6 e
e oesesseeeeeeeesseesseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeosee:__
TOTAL K.82 f.85 1.98 2.98 S.68 f.98 S.62 PERCENT AVG SPEED 3.s 6.1 9.7 15.6 28.9 27.4 12.7 avamTETw e
- sg PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY OF CALMSYDISTRIBUTED ABOTE WITE StTamTET MTBBLE VALID READINGS
- 485 4
TABLE 19 -
- c.,..: :
---~__.__
e e
y --
2 RUN DATE:
1-25-95 DPC ENFIRGIENTAL MONITOWTEE4378TWE NSEE4.
4 PERCENTAGE WIND FR N DISTIEUTION'EY PRSOUILL STRSTtTTF CIASS
e=====
=
eeeeee......eoe ee
..eeeeeeeeeeeeee.oeooseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee..=========e=_
PassWILL cf.ans Dr SITE IWueEs LACBNR; Star =Y PERIOD OF RE9EDs #1-fleS9 TEN 12-31-89
- SAROAD 180 513628584 3
ST&BTT.' TTY IggranummentfeW-DCLTR TWW BENTues.
=. = = = _ - _
- -==-
=
=
- eeeeeesseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee=========e=_======ee:
punt =Impr.-
WIND SPEED (HpK)
DIRECTION f-3 4-7 S-12 13-13 19-24
> 24 TDEEL BFEED eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeee.
.eeeeeeeeeeeee = = = = = = = = = = = = =: = = = eee-
_ _ = = = = = _ _======____. _ = ese.
e t
N f.15 1.52 2.45 2.47 f.91 f.37 7.38 12.9 NNE f.f7 f.71 f.31 f.f9 K.59 f.N 1.59 7.9 NE f.f5 f.53 f.52 f.f9 f.N f.M 1.18 7.9 ENE f.54 f.41 f.34 f.13 f.ft.
f.M f.94 S.1 E
f.f7 f.44 f.21 f.54 f.ff f.N N.76 6.9 ESE f.57 f.49 f.33 f.84 f.SS f.M f.92 7.8 SE 5.15 f.64 f.91 f.32 f.57 f.M 2.55 15.4 SSE f.13 f.88 2.74 1.95 f.27 f.SS 5.89 11.4 S
f.32 2.56 3.32 3.25 1.29 f.82 18.76 11.9 SSW f.14 1.12 f.32 f.36 f.f4 f.N 2.48 S.3 SW f.18 f.55 f.35 f.56 f.S1 f.Sf 1.1#
6.6 WSW K.14 f.41 f.37 f.29 K.52 f.N 1.24 9.8 W
f.19 f.SS f.7f f.27 f.f4 f.M 2.87 S.1 WNW f.23 f.34 1.44 f.76 f.f4 f.M 3.36 9.5 NW K.26 1.28-3.41 1.85 f.23 f.f4 7.56 18.7 NNet A.22 1.58 1.31 1.54 f.59 f.11 5.44 12.8 YARIABLE f.58 f.53 f.ff f.M f.M f.M f.SS f.F e
_- = - = = = = =.
ee.ooeeeeee=======eeeeeeeeeeeee=========e=============_:
6 PERCENT TOTAL 2.45 13.77 28.93 14.12 3.52 f.54 55.37 AVG SPEED-2.8 5.7 9.9 15.1 25.3 28.6 18.7 e
PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY OF CAIJEStDISTRIBUTED ABDFE WITE NEUferr.
gTamTT.ITI
- f.F VALID READTim:R.
- 473#
TABLE -
- '4
- ~?**:
'y.~
.,.m A v.
L.
=1 i,a 3y.;., = a:
. - =.
.c,
- g...
l RUN DATE:
1-25-99 DPC ENIm EB12DRIBMSTRTM PSSEs-S*
I PERCENT 1GE WIND FREQUENCY DISTIBUTION ET DESOUILT STRBTLTTY CIASS L
- 22.
- __-222.: -
SITE NMIE LACBWR STACK PERIOD OF RESED: #1-91989 TEEU 12-31-89 l
paamrrtr_ cLaas II.
- SARoAD 30 51362fsS4 STABTtTTY IESTRUMENTRTION-HELT1 T W SLIGHTLY1rvaELE 3
............................:u:::12 WIND SPEED (MPE)
PEM*2MT BrumanE
=
DIRECTION S-3 4-7 S-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TOTRL BFEED l
..=.
_:::==.::=====:::======2===-
= : :. --
- __=e.
N f.23 1.17 1.14 f.61 f.84 f.54 3.12 9.5 i
NNE E.19 9.42 9.18 E.61 E.EE 9.06 E.SW 6.1 b
NE E.14 E.23 B.94 E.96 f.96
-B.99 K.41 4.6 ENE E.99 f.98 9.96 E.91 E.OB E.96 S.25 5.4 E
K.15 f.18 f.54 f.sr K.SW f.Sf 5.36 4.5 f
i ESE K.15 f.25 f.38 f.86 f.51 S.55 K.55 6.5 i
SE 5.37 f.29 f.19 S.25 f.96 S.SW 1.17 S.1 j
SSE K.62 f.59 f.75 f.6s f.55 f.SS 2.65 8.4 l.
S K.89 1.26 1.84 2.19 f.47 f.55 6.65 18.6 SSW W.42 f.77 f.59 S.89 f.8W E.SW 1.37 6.5 SW s.3E g.46 m.15 m.92 E.92 B.0E E.96 5.6
?
WSW E.16 E.16 9.94 f.92 B.96 E.M E.39 5.E H
9.27 8.28 E.95 f.El E.96 E.M E.61 4.6
?
WIItt 5.14 f.34 f.99 f.St f.St f.M f.57 5.2 4
B99 E.42 f.67 E.57 f.97 9.96 E.96 1,73 6.5 i
1450t 8.25 8.66 f.54 S.19 f.51 f.SS 1.54 7.4 VARIABLE K.RB K.EE B.99 E.EW
.B.99 E.96 f.9E f.E
(
i
]
- _22:
- 22:2.
PERCENT TOTAL 4.81 7.81 6.32 4.14 f.66 f.f4 23.77 i
AVG SPEED 2.5 5.4 9.7 15.2 19.9 28.4 S.1 l
[
PERCENThCE FREQUEBCY OF CAIJES fDISTRIBUTED.ABUTE WITE.WLIGETLY STE3tLE J STRETLTTY =
363 3
VALID READIEGS :. 2831 4
p TABLE 21 -
i i
I..
.. ; ~ a:
,~,'~..a...,
~-
?.-
~
n
~
= _.-,_ _ - -__ __ _ _____.__-__-________. _-. _.... - _ _ _ _ - - _. _
. -. ~
. =
KUN DATE:
1-25-99 EPC ENFIRONMTAL MONITORIEL8YSTEN 7883.
6-l l.
PERCERThGE WIND FRSOUEMBY DISTEBUTION ET PASOUILL STBSTtTTF CLASS l
t
.=== =.= = = =.=============== =. _ =-
__=
l i
SITE NAME: LhCBWR SIACK PERIOD OF RE9ED: #1-Sit *S9 TERW 12-31-39 PASGWILL CIASS FT.
- SAROAD NO 513628854 3
STABILITT IN TRURRETATISN-BELTR TWWP senemmTEEE BIBELE l
l
.======___.==== =..- _====.
i s
WIND SPEED tMPE)
PenramT Eymmaca DIRECTION f-3 4-7 S-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TUTEL SPEED l
.= __ =-_==-
-====
N 5.19 K.35 E.13 f.16 f.81 f.88 K.84 7.6 NNE R.12 B.15 E.E7 E.E9 R.96 E.96 E.34 5.1 EE E.E5 E.E7 9.94 9.96 9.98 E.9E E.15 4.7 EEE E.98 E.97 9.91 E.E1 E.90 E.9E E.18 4.8 i
E 6.96 B.97-B.96 9.96 9.96 E.96 E.13 4.1 l
ESE K.97 E.Ri E.EE E.WE E.M E.BE R.13 3.5 l
SE E.32 5.37 K.fS f.81 E.95 S.BW
.S.78 4.8 I
SSE K.66 E.89 E.39 9.65 E.96 9.96 1.98 5.2 l
S S.88 2.54 f.75 f.13 f.9f f.9W 3.79 5.7 l
SSw g.26 S.29 E.92 6.EE S.96 E.9E E.57 4.E SW f.22 S.58 f.51 f.95 f.9W f.Af E.32 3.1
\\
NSW E.11 B.98 B.91 E.96 E.BE 3.M B.26 3.8
~
w E.96 E.g4 g.Em E.96 S.99 9.M g.99 3.8 HNN B.99 9.67 E.El E.99 9.9E 9.96 S.18 4.2 NN g.Es E.99 K.92 6.90 9.96 E.9E 6.29 4.2
(
Innt f.16 K.12 f.f4 f.81 S.95 f.98 E.33 4.5
- YApinnLE g.g3 g.gg E.gg g.gg g.90 g.gr g 90 g.2 i.
y i
PERCENT i
TOTAL 3.44 4.85 1.58 f.37 K.51 f.95 18.25
[
s I
AVG SPEED 2.3 S.3 9.3 14.4 18.6 E.E 5.2 i
t t
PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY OF CALMiUISTRIBUTED. ABOTE WETE.M3DENTEEY BTERLE ETRSTtTTY =
E65 t
t VALID READINGS =
876
[
f i
[
1 I
b
[
Tanta 3
. l t
r
+
a
+
,+
~.
.t-U dnE QVIE*
I-ES-68 Gd3 IIIAI M N u M N M'
1-dE53EM3geS nIuG senusu x rrvszirsa.ztnsa.gJ EvecnIIT sutII'IZZ 3ITsS
. = = = = = = = = =.
. - - - = = = = =. = = = = = = =
==
.l*
. SIII tniME8 1*43EnM SIVUE dEEIOG OJ EgaogGs 31-61-56 &EEA lE-E1-86 dggnaTrT 3ITS3 98' SVH0vG raO 51E9ZERED SXYSII*III IKSxmmzWXISE-EEI WY-X EEEEI*EM
'AW &EMd
.=======
==_ -=== =.=========-
- ===
r A
nIEG SdEEG )MdE(
aummx m gE GIHE31 ION E-E t-L S-lE iE-IS 16-ED
< ZP EGEEI' BdEEG
...e....=========.=_
======.w=======.=--
-====.e_
=
E E*gI E*EE E*Et E*EE E*ES E*EB E*ES lB*E EME E*Et E*EE E*ED E*EE B*EB E*ED 3*E9 t'9 KE E*EB E*EZ B*EE E*ED B*6R E*EB E*SE t*1 EME E*E1 E*ES 3*ED 3*EE H*6B E*ER B*E9 t*9 E
E*ET E*ES E*EB E*EB E*EB E*6B E*ET E*t ESE E*EZ E*EI 3*ED E*ED E*EB E*EB E*EV t*E
~
e sE E*EF E*ES 3*ES 3*EI E*ED E*6B E*lT 9*S SSE E*11
- tI E*ES
- 1E E*ES E*ES E*SI L*E S
3*Et E*EL H*16 E*E9 E*EB B*6B E'99 L*E
(
SSN E*RE E*BZ E*EB 3*EB E*6B E*CB E*BG C*6
~
SM 3*3E E'BR 3*ED E*ED E*ER 3*ES E*EE E't e
nSM E*ED E*EI B*ED E*ED E*EB E*62 E*E1
- t N
E*E1 E*EB F*ED E*EB E*EB E*ED E*EI t*1
~
nien E*ES E*E1 E*EB 5*ER E*EB E*ES E*ET E*9 len 3*EI B*ED E*ED E*ER E*ES E*6R E*E1 E*1 e
Elln E*EE E*EZ E*EB E*EE 3*EB H*ES E*&S C*S e
~
. AMEIWEI'E E'EB -
......==========:=_=====.---- _ : = :-
=====.
- - - =
dEEDEMI 10nI' E*ES 1*EL 5*tS
- ET E*ES E*ES E*TE YAD SdXEG E*t S*S 6*S it*$
E*E E*E 9*S dEEDEggggE rwrnrnuru*x og 3vIrStGIg&Ertsninrr TEDAE NILE EIZEEREI'X EEEEI*IR EEEEII*IZZ =
S?S AWI*IG MIWGIKSE.
181 I
1vsIF zg -
.g
.se.
...s
......... A...
~
l RUN DATE:
1-25-98 DPC ENTIMOMMTAL N3NITOmfimmpawnTEN PAGEt.
S*
PERCENTAGE WIND FREQUENCY DISTIBUTION ET PASOUILL STARTT. TTY CIASS t
t
..... =;:::.
SITE NAMES IACBWR STACK PERIOD OF RECORD: #1-81-89 TERU 12-31-89 PASOUILL CLASS ALL SAROAD NO 513625584 STABILITY INSTRUMENTATION-DELTA TEMP ALL
. _....==
=.. = = _ = _ =
1 I
i i
WIND EPEED (MPE) parar-umT m
l DIRTCTION f-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24
> 24 TDTEL SWEED j
i i
....=======.==__======__===
_ _ _ = = = = = = =
=.
N f.59 3.46 4.72 4.85 1.39 f.48 14.69 11.8 NME f.41 1.32 1.55 f.11 f.Sf f.Sf 2.89 7.5 NE f.25 f.s7 f.64 f.89 f.ft f.Kr 1.s3 6.9 ENE f.22 f.61 f.42 f.16 f.82 f.88 1.44 7.5 4
E f.29 f.78 f.26 f.85 f.ft f.SS 1.35 6.8 ESE f.32 f.83 f.43 f.79 f.fi f.89 1.69 6.5 SE f.88 1.39 1.38 1.17 f.13 f.fr 4.95 3.9 SSE 1.51 2.69 4.17 3.84 f.43 f.Sf 11.85 9.6 j
5 2.12 5.91 7.21 6.31 1.99 f.82 23.56 18.5 ssW f.84 2.35 1.58 f.75 f.25 f.SS 5.68 7.9 SW f.74 1.15 f.59 f.89 f.75 f.St 2.61 6.5 WSW K.41 f.67 f.44 f.32 f.52 f.ft 1.86 7.6 W
f.53 1.19 f.84 f.33 f.f4 S.St 2.93 7.4 WNW f.52 1.28 1.64 f.78 f.99 f.SS 4.31 S.9 Nw S.78 2.57 4.18 2.36 f.29 f.f4 9.73 15.1 NNW f.66 2.58 2.67 2.25 f.31 f.16 S.63 11.1
- VARIABLE -
f.85 f.ft f.ff-f.St
-S.ft f.ft f.f5 f.2
- 2::
PERCENT i
TOTAL 11.15 28.58 32.23 21.91 5.48 f.78 ~
188.88 i
AVG SPEED 2.5 5.6 9.8 15.2 25.4 28.2 9.7 1
i 4
2 PERCENTAGE FREQUENCY OF CALN57 DISTRIBUTED A307E WITE ALL STARILITY
- f.f Vat.Tn READINGS = 8543 i
h 4
h TABLE
- S
.. ~ - - -
~, _ _ _, -
m.
~
t.
i
.I
,+
l 1
t
~
I i -
i 1
i 1
i j
i i
i i
i I
i SECTION B
)
i 1
y.
I l
ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL J
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT 4-l l
t
).
? $_-
t l
r.
l' INTRODUCTION:
The Radiological Environmental Monitoring (REM) Program is conducted to comply with the requirements of Technical Specifications and in accordance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix 1.
The REM Program provides measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which could potentially lead to radiation doses to Members of the Public resulting from plant affluents.
Environmental samples are taken within the surrounding areas of the plant and in selected control or background locations.
-The monitoring program at the LACBWR facility includes monitoring of liquid and gaseous releases from the plant, as well'as environmental samples of surface air, river water, river sediment, milk, fish, and penetrating radiation.
The REM program theory supplements the Radioactive Effluent analyses by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effloant measurements and modeling of the environmental exposure pathways using the metho&ilogy of the Of fsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM).
An Interlaboratory Comparison Program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive material in environmental samples are performed to demonstrato that the results are reasonably valid..-.
i This monitoring report includes the period from January 1,1989, to December 31, 1989. The report includes a description of the environmental j
samples collected, analytical methods, statistical inferences, and the results from these analyses.
i A series of maps of the general vicinity surrounding LACBWR are provided for the reader so that he/she may determine the spatial relationship of the plant to the surrounding area. Figure 1 is a map that includes the plant boundary, roads, other generating plants, and the relation of the plant site to the nearest local community.
t i
Figure 2 is a map that pinpoints the location of the environmental sampling stations for surface air, and milk. This map when used with Table 6 will allow the reader to determine the spatial relationship of the plant to
[
the surrounding sampling stations.
l t
I Environmental direct radiation monitor (TLD) locations for 1989 can be e
found by referring to Figure 3 and 4 and Table 7.
1.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION The sampling frequency of the various environmental samples and the l
analyses performed on these samples are shown in Table 5.
The number of L
various samples collected and analyzed during 1989 is shown in Table 8.
l The environmental penetrating radiation dose is measured by thermo-luminescent dosimeters consisting of four lithium fluoride (LiF) chips. The.
i e
TLD's are located in the vicinity of the plant on poles. trees or adjacent to l
h
- air sample locations. The TLD's are collected, shipped and then analyzed by f
i a contractor.
Air samples are collected continuously at seven sites, six of which are within three miles of the plant and the seventh used as a control, located eighteen miles north of the plant in La Crosse, Wisconsin. Particulate air i'
samples are collected at the rate of approximately 30-601pm with Gelman Air Samples. The air filter consists of a glass fiber filter with an associated Y
pore size of approximately 0.45 pm.
The particulate filters are analyzed for gross beta activity with an internal proportional counter, and the monthly j
particulate composites are gamma analyzed for individual isotopic concentra-tion. Addendum 64 to the LACBWR Technical Specifications was issued in December of 1988. This addendum eliminated the req'uirements to sample the air for I-131 due.to the stablilization of all iodine at LACBWR. No charcoal I-131 results will be included for the air samples in the environmental l
report.
L River water is collected monthly. River water samples above, at and R
below the plant site are collected and are gamma analyzed for isotopic concentration.
A one liter milk sample is collected from three farms in the vicinity of the plant on a biweekly basis during the grazing season.
The milk samples are gamma-scanned for I-131 and any other isotope with at least an eight-day l
half life.
L l' -
l i,,
Fish samples are collected on a quarterly basis from Pool #8 above the plant or Pool #9 below the plant. Samples of the edible portions of the fish
)
are gamma isotopically analyzed.
l River sediment (silt) samples are collected twice per year at, above and below the Genoa-3 condenser cooling water dis:harge point in Pool #9. These samples are gamma isotopically analyzed.
j i
Vegetation was collected from the local gardens at the time of harvest.
These samples are gamma isotopically analyzed.
2.0 RESULTS OF THE 1989 RADIO-ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SURVEYS During 1989, activity levels in the local environment were normal, indicating no significant plant attributed radioact'ivity.
'1 2.1 PENETRATING' RADIATION 1
The environmental TLD's are changed on a quarterly basis and are sent to an outside contractor for reading. The results of this survey
. I program are shown on Table 9.
These badges have been divided into three categories:
A) Control badges - greater than 5 miles from the plant (13 badges)
B) Offsite badges - from owner-controlled fence to 5 miles from the plant (25 badges)
C) Onsite badges - within owner-controlled fence (3 badges)
J
I The control badge resulta are averaged for each quarter to determine a background dose reading for the environment. This reading can then be subtracted from each onsite or offsite badge reading to l
determine the potential dose contribution from LACBWR. The following is
]
a listing of the highest quarter location and also the quarterly averages.
i i
L I
i HIGHEST TLD READING i
f; (minus control badge average value)
I l
IST OTR l
2ND OTR 3RD OTR 4TH OTR j
f j
l l
ll j onsite (ares /atr) 0.3
- 2.02 l 2.14 t 1.00 1.06
- 3.91 3.00 t 0.35 i i
l J
?
i j onsite location
- 7 7
<*1 7
l.
I l
n-.
'i'
\\
l Offsite (ares /atr)
! 0.0 t 0.0
!3.54 1 9.32 11.06 t 2.61 '2.18
- 4.35 j I
i i
35 35
'l 4
l_Offsite location
- l
- See table 7.
i 1-AVERAGE TLD READING (minus control badge average value) i f
?
I i
l l
1ST OTR 2ND OTR 3RD OTR
! 4TH OTR l
l l
l f
l 0
O 0
l 1
l Onsite (mrem /atr)
O l
l l
ll i
l Offsite (mrem /atr) 0 1 0.11tl.01 0
O L
l Control badge l
l f
l o
l (mrem /atr) 21.3t4.62 ! 24.66t4.98 ! 15.74t4.81 21.42t4.25 l h
. o
r-1 o
i t
l 2.0 AIR PARTICULATE The gross beta-gamma activity concentrations from air particulate filters are shown in Table 10. Composite air particulate isotopic j
analyses are found in Table 11. Comparison between the control station i
at La Crosse and the six stations near LACBWR indicate that there was no i
significant plant attributable airborne particulate.
1 2.3 RIVER WATER
.)
1 The river water gamma isotopic analyses are shown in Table 12.
The results indicate that there is insignificant plant attributable radio-nuclides in river water. The river wster samples taken above, at and
)
l below the plant discharge point generally exhibited similar activity patterns during 1989.
I 2.4 SEDIMENT SAMPLES Sediment samples were collected above, at, and below the plant
[
outfall. These samples were gamma analyzed and these results appear on.
Table 13. They indicated that small amounts of plant attributed radionuclides have accumulated in river sediments near the outfall.
h I
L t i i
i j
~
2.5 MIIK SAMPLES Milk samples were collected on a biweekly basis during the grating season (May through September) from three dairy farms in the vicinity of IACBWR and gamma analyzed for I-131. These samples are listed in
]
Table 14. There has been no significant accumulation of plant attributed radionuclides in milk in the vicinity of LACBWR.
q J
2.6 FISH
{
Fish samples were collected quarterly above and below the plant discharge. The results of gamuna spectral analysis of edible portions of fish samplas appear in Table 15. There has been no significant accumulation of plant attributed radionuclides in fish in the vicinity of 1ACBWR.
i 2.7 VEGETATION Vegetation samples were collected from local gardens at the time of harvest. The results of the gansna spectral analysis of the vegetation samples appear on Table 16. There has been no significant accumulation of plant attributed radionuclides in the vegetation.
3.0 CONCLUSION
S All environmental samples collected and analyzed during 1989 exhibited no significant contribution from 1ACBWR.
F.
c 4
4.0 INTFJt1ADORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS During 1989. interlaboratory comparison samples were obtained from an outside contractor. The equipment used to analyse the environmental samples was tested against the contractors results. The following is the result of
)
this comparison.
j l
1ACBWR l
Contractor j
i Analysis Results (uCt/cc)
Results (uC1/cc) l I
Gross Beta l
1.45 E-3 l
1.35 E-3 1
i Gross Alpha l
4.03 E-4 l:
5.55 E-4 l
l Tritium 3.85 E-3 l
1.15 E-3 l
Cs-137 l
8.52 E-3 l
1.10 E-2 ll Co-60 l
1.19 E-2 1.58 E-2 ll i
l 1
a e
r i
i l
{
! l I
4 l
8lf lWLLU.b09
-..e.
J
,,g i
i i,
H L
a.,,
.6
.g*
8y L
~
c j
R 2M M
'-), 'j LOCATION MAP
- A 1109 f t radius A
l 3
- g
,,, y SCALE or Ptti g
ed.ic i I T.+s01 N.. R. 3 W.
i.
"~
0F T,HE Sth RM -
Pp0PERTY
- LINE
- gp= '
JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP HOUSTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
,s
,,C.
Lot t S
eamon souva ste ?
A
-,LO T vettAst units
,uaig
.t 4,
"g
/,'
ELL T
I T.13 N., R.-7 W.
i I
0F THE 4th P.M.-
gg
/
oTOWN OF GENOA Ed4
.. I-- VERNON COUNTY, y,,,,
i-4 site De
($huo l
l WISCONSIN e
l 4 >I estAttD 496 a
e El i
LOY T LOT 4 W 32 T.13_W
{
SCC. f>
1.* l2 N.
/
j e#0fte llt ANO 196 It UNDER TML i
JU AIS0tC Te0W OF UPet h
,/
MISSISSIPre Rivtn wetc U'I
""O I'8" "E MI'
- 674 tmDitat tl petts 600yt tMt WOVise Of I ME OMIO Revth.
FIGURE 1 - IACBWR PROPERTY MAP REM suzynpy a-
~
si a
N\\
,p.
N 4 h
/ // =. &
I
/
3 t
M
'N l
h G
\\
Ep,7
-]
i 5".,,* -
j g;
,g[
.Q.. L
}\\(<%[
s 4
g p
M
""kju
\\-(
- 'WT ff 5
no 3
FL ?.rt.nl.
e t
u
._._; '7 s
- 21
-ff l J\\A ga s
T#
L//
g__, [ N 4-b es:"Cs %
.5 6 di A j
13 GEMA
'{
"[
t f
of 7
SO'
\\'.
Mud Qp W i 1
Lake 1
4
%~g ffQr" N
Permanent
..ha,k
. Dry N_
,i Environmental i
h o I cations FIGURE 2 - PERMANENT ENVIRONMENTAL HONITORING STATION LOCATIONS (Refer to Table 6)
REM. -
f 4
g Semederd 1
Seem i
l n
E 1
e l'
D p m-,
r l
8 O
Ob 4,/f gS@
e e
i y
ip i
g O
I@
',3 0.
bbh I
l tregler pagy G
I 'I
\\
ts w
e f
o.
bh M h
e
?
r am.
1 i
w T
3
/
j u
f
[
c l
l
{
(
scatt o
y
^
d l
f AA#f i
l
/
o.ei n c avetusieu /
LAC #WR.
\\.
64vuosu t
,o p
- ' *".V.
' funutur L 4 a
1, utnu souw mav i
/
l s to 0%
/
O
/
8 p
g enoust e
?
e e
g-
\\
l
\\ #
I
($
el v
3 i
FIGURE 4 - LACBWR ENVIRONMENTAL DOSE ASSESSMENT IhCATIONS REM l
l
~
TABLE 5 SAMPLE FREqurmCi AND ANALYSIS OF RADIO-ENVIROIOGNTAL SAMPLES SAMPLE FREQUrmCi ANALYSIS PERFOIDED TLD (LiF) Dosimeters Quarterly Dose in arres Particulate Air Glass Weekly Gross Beta and Gamma Spectroscopy of Fiber Filters Composites Monthly (HPGe-tKA)
Milk Biweekly during grazing season Gamma Spectroscopy Sediment Twice per year Gamma Spectroscopy Fish Quarterly Gamma Spectroscopy River Monthly r - isotopic analysis and trititus (Internal Liquid Scintillation Spectrometer)
Vegetation At time of harvest Gamma Spectroscopy
c a
L t
TABLE 6 PERMANDIT T
F ENVIR0l#GDfTAL MONITORING STATION LDCATIONS (Refer to Figure 2) l 1hCATION j
l AIR l
l l
NO.
LOCATION SAMPLE MILK 1
i Pedretti Farm i
x l
x i,
i i
i e
e e
e s
e 1
l 2
l P. Malin Fara l
x x
l l
l 3
l A. Malin Farm l
l x
l l
l r
4 l
Gianoli Fara l
x t
e i
e s
e
\\,
5 l
Dam No. 8 l
x l
c e
s e
I 1
1 l
6 l
Trailer Court l
x l
l l
7 l
Crib House j
x' l
g o
8 j
Main Office l
x 4
I l
}
i TABLE 7 a
ENVIRONMENTAL TLD LOCATIONS l LOCATION j l
NO.
l lhCATION i
u j
1 ACROSS RIVER.5 MI W l
2 AGMS RIVE ACSOSS FROM G-1.
5 MI WNW i
l 3
AGMS RIVER W END OF DAM #8.1 MI NW 4
- 3 R::DGE ROA) AND BEYER HILL ROAD. 3 MI SE MOUlO R':DGE W 6 HWY $6. 2 MI E 6
AT TLAI 2R COUR '.
5 MI SSW W
7 ON F:lNCE A N *S FROM FUEL TANK N OF G-1.
2 MI N j
8 8 0F P"$Rrr'I *^A3. E OF SITE. 3 MI SW 9
E SIDE OF F:3
".^.N'S ROAP.
3 MI $
I
?
10 0-3 CONTROL *^LJM.
1 MI SSW 11 VF OF BLU'F..$ MI E J
12 00WT RM i K AND HICKORY RIDGE ROAD. 3 MI ENE l
13 COUlfT R^AD K AND COWii ROAD 0. $.2 MI NNE j
a l
14 NW FHM rm*EY FARM.1.2 MI ENE j
1$
DAM #8.1 MJ N l
16 GIANOLI. 2 MI NNE 17 llWY $6 AT ROMCE. 4.5 MI ESE 18 g mETTI. 1.8 MI SE j
19
_ 893 ABOVE GLw1A LEGION,1.2 MI NNE 4
l 20 SW GArsr0si AT END OF G-3 DIKE. 4 MI SSW l
21 DPC SBVICE Ciiman. 19 MI N l~
l 23 S BAD AXE ROA3. 3.8 MI SSE l
24 S BAD AXE ROAD AND WORMAN AND KURHN ROAD. 5 MI SE l
25 ST0DM83. 8 MI N
'l j
26 M# MONY, 10 MI E l
27
? DE SOTO. OLD HWY 35, 9 MI SSE l
28 4 MI N 29 3.5 MI ENE 30 VICTORY. 4.5 MI S i
l' 31 RENO. 3.5 MI NW i
l 32 NEW ALBIN. 9 MI SSW l
33 ACROSS ROAD FROM BECK'S FISH MARKET. 3 MI N I
34 APPROX. 7 MILE N OF JUNCTION ON HWY 26 & 14 35 l
APPROX. 3 MI N OF NEW ALBIN ON HWY 26, 3 MI SW, MILLSTONE RECREATION AREA e
j 36 NEW ALBIN. 5.5 MI SW. HWY 26 N OF NEW ALBIN (IA) 37 FISH HATCHERY. 2.8 MI SSE 38 CALEDONIA. 13 MI NW (MN) i 39 APPROX. 3.5 MI S OF NEW ALBIN ON HWY 26. 7.5 MI SSW j
40 RED MOUND 7.5 MI SE l
41
- VIR00UA, 19 MI E
. -w ^-m--
y-
~ - - - - - - - - * - - - -, +
e e-w-,---
--3+.w-w w
a
Llo g
TABLE 8 RADIO DNIRONMENTAL SAMPLES COLLECTED JANUARY-DECEMBER 1989 TYPE OF SAMPLE NUMBER OF SAMPLES Penetrating Radiation (TLD's) 159 l
Air Particulate 362 i
River Water 36 L
Sediment 6
Milk 47 Fish 8
Effluent Split w/St. of Wisc.
12 Vegetation 1
t 1
l
!. i l'
%.r-4h '
0 s
l '.',
4 t_.
TABLE 9 OUARTERLY THERM 0 LUMINESCENT DOSIMETER DOSE MEASUREMENTS IN THE LACBWR VICINITY JANUARY-DECEMBER 1989 l
l 1st QUARTER l 2nd QUARTER l 3rd QUARTER l 4th QUARTER l l STATION NO.
mrem mrem mrem mrem h
. l i
,l 1 (offsite) 16.2 i 6.8 23.2 i 10.1 ! 13.0 t 0.0
! 18.0 t 5.7 l
l l
l
' 2 (offsite)' !
19.2 t 8.9 MISSING
' HISSING 17.4 t 3.6 l
l-l l
\\,
3 (offsite) 17.4 t 1.1 1
21.4 1 7.8
! 12.0 1 1.4 16.2 1 3.6 i
I, l
i 4 (offsite)
? '17.6 t 5.9 23.4 t 1.8
! 14,0
- 1.4
' 23.6
- 8.6 l
i l
L l
l 5 (offsite) 17.8 t 4.1 21.4
- 5.4 14.2 1 ?g6
" 20.6 i 4.6 l
r l
l l
l l
6 (offsite) 17.8 t 2.6 23.2 1 2.2 MISSING
! 19.8 t 3.0 l
h l
l l
26.8 t 5.9 16.8
- 0.9
! 24.4 t 3.9 7 (onsite)
! 21.6
- 6'6 l
l j.
l'-
8 (offsite)
!- 20.0 t 4.5 25.0 t 0.0 15.0 t 2.8 J 18.6 t 2.3 l:
i 9 (offsite)' !
17.4 t 2.3 21.6
- 4.1
! 14.8 t 7.3 1 20'2
- 6.4
-l 10 (onsito)
!- 14.4 t 1.8.
l l
l 1.
i.
v 21.2 i 7.8 12.4 t 1.8 15.6 t 1.8 l
I f
n l
l -11 (offsite) 18.0 i 6.5
?
23.6
- 7.2
! 13.8 t 1.7
! 19.4 t 3.3 l
l i
l l
'l l
12 (offsite) 18.6 t 1.1 24.0 t 3.5
! 13.2 i 6.1
! 19.8 i 4.1 j
l i
24.4 t 1.8
! 16.8 t 2.6 22.0 t 1.4 ll i
l-13 (control)
! 19.4 t 1.8 l
l l
l
-i l
l ~14 (offsite) 19.8 i 4.3 25.2 2: 4.6
! 16.2
- 2.2 MISSING l
?
l l
l l
l 15 (offsite) 19.6 t 4.1 24.6 i 8.8
! 15.6 t 2.3
! 21.2 1 5.0 l
l l-l 16 (offsite)- !
19.0 t 4.7 24.8
- 3.8
! 16.2 t 0.9
! 23.0 1 2.0 l
l 17'(offsite) 15.8
- 3.0 20.0 t 4.9 14.0 t 2.4
! 17.0 t 2.0 l
1 l
l l
18 (offsite) 17.8 t 4.3 23.0 t 7.1
! 14.0 t 6.6
! 21.8
- 1.7 l
d l
l l
l l
19 (offsite) 18.2 1 3.6
! 23.0 t 6.2
! 14.4 t 3.3
! 21.0 t 2.8 l
l l
l l 20 (onsite) 17.8
- 2.2 22.2 t 5.5
! 12.6 1 1.8
! 19.8 i 4.6 l
'l l
l l
l l
l 21 (control) 15.0 t 2.0 1
15.4 i 5.2 9.2 1 2.2
! 13.6
- 1.8 l
All TLD's greater than 5 miles from the plant are considered control TLD's.
41
n l
- ver TABLE 9 - (cont'd)
OUARTERLY THERM 0 LUMINESCENT DOSIMETER DOSE MEASUREMENTS IN THE LACBWR VICINITY JANUARY-DECEMBER 1989, 1st QUARTER l 2nd QUARTER
, 3rd QUARTER ! 4th QUARTER l-STATION NO.
mrem mrem mrem mrem l
1 s'
i 22 (offsite) 15.0 t 1.4 20.4 t 4.6 12.6
- 2.3 17.4 t 3.3 l
l l
l l
23 (offsite) 16.0 t 3.2 16.8 t 7.0 13.8 t 2.6 20.6 t 8.7 i-i n
6 i
l 24 (offsite) 17.2 t 1.7 21.6 t 6.4 12.6 t 1.8 l
18.6 t 3.0 l
l l
l i
,),
l 25 (control) 17.2 i 1.3 24.8 i 6.1 14.8 t 2.6
! 20.0 t 2.8 l
l l
l l
l 26 (control) 21.4 i 6.1 24.8
- 4.6
~! 15.6 i 1.1
! 22.6 i 2.7 l
l l
l l
d l
27'(control) 19.8
- 3.6 24.8 1.7 15.8
- 1.7
! 21.0't 2.8 l
l l
l 28 (cont.rol) 16.6
- 2.7 19.6 t 3.0 12.8 i 3.8
! 19.0 t 7.6 l
l l
i l-l-
l ' 29 (offsite) 17.4 t 8.6 1 21.6 i 3.0
! 14.8 i 3.6 ! 20.2 t 5.9-l l
l l
i.
l l
l 30 (control)-
31.4 1 13.4 34.6 i 3.6
' 19.8 t 1.7
! 29.2 t 7.4 l
l l
l u
l 31 (offsite) l 20.2
- 3.6 22.6 t 1.8 14.0 t 2.0
! 21.4 t 5.0 i
l l
l j
32 (control)- !
16.4
- 3.0-20.2 i 5.4
! 13.0 t 2.'4
! 16.6 i 3.6 l
l l
l u
i l 33 (offsite) 17.4 i 7.0 19.2
- 2.6
! 12.4
- 1.8
' 17.4 t 1.8 l
i l_ 34 (offsite) 17.2 + 2.6-27.6 i 10.7 ! 14.8 t 1.7
, 18.8 i 5.2 l
I' l
l l
35 (offsite)~
19.6 i 2.7 28.2 i 14.3 ! 16.8
- 2.2 22.4 t 2.3 l
l l
I l
36 (control)
.- 17.8 t 1.7 22.6
- 5.9
! 16.2 i 4.6 19.8-t 5.4 l
l l
l l
l 37 (offsite) 18.4 t 3.3 19.6 t 3.9
! 11.4 i 5.0
',. 14.2 i 3.3 l
o l
l-l l
l l
1 15.4
- 4.4 l-l 38 (control)
MISSING 19.6 i 6.6 l 11.2 i 0.9 l
l-39 (control) 18.2 1 3.6 19.8 3.0
! 12.8 i 0.9
! 18.4 i 3.6 l
~l l
l l
l l
p l 40 (control) 19.8 t 5.0 21.6 i 3.0
! 14.4 i 3.9
! 19.6 i 3.6 l
l l
l c
l l
10.1* l I
l 41 (control)
! 102.4 t 48.4 t 14.8 ! 32.2 t 5.2
! 41.2 i 8.2 l.
All TLD's greater than 5 miles from the plant are considered control TLD's.
- Not used in average.
! l l.-
._, n 6
O.
9*.
TABLE 10
~~
WEEKLY GROSS BETA AIR PARTICULATES IN THE LACBWR VICINITY (Reporting Level = 10 times Control Value) l COLLECTION lLACBWR PLANT l TRAILER COURT l DAM #8.
(GIANOLI FARM j.MALIN FARM lFEDRETTI FARM; LA CROSSZ; ;
i DATE pCi/m8 pCi/m8 pCI/m8-oCi/m8 i
pCi/m
pC1/m8 CONTROL ^l i
l_1/10/89
!.060 i.004 !.071 t.003
.079
.004
.088 i.005 l.063't.003 !.066 t'.003 !.068 t.003 l.
I I
l l
l l
l 1/17/89 i.033 i.003 !.035 i.003-!.040 t.003 !.031 i.003 !.030 t.002 ! '.039 i.003 !.034 +.003 l l
l l
l
~I I-I I
l 1/24/89 !.012 i.002 l.026 t.002 !.029 i.003 !.029 i.003 !.015 i.002 !.027 i.002 !.028
.002 l-l l
I l
I l
l 1/31/89 !.032 i.003 !.038 t.003 !.040 t.003 !.037 +.004 !.034 i.002 !.038 i.003 !.037 i.003 ;
i i
l 2/7/89
!.028 i.003 !.045 i.003 !.045 t.003 !.036 i.004 !.023 i.002 !.025 i.002 !.043 i.003 l l
l l
l l
l I
I I
l 2/14/89 !.020 i.002 ;.011 i.001~!.034 i.003 !.041 i.004 !.026 i.002 !.032 i.003 !.030 t.002 l l
l l
l l
l 1
l_2/21/89
!.027
.003 !.029 t.002 !.037 i.003 !.023
.003 !.014 i.002 !.031 i.002 !.029 t.002 l l
l
- _2/28/89 !.018 i.002 !.031 i.002 !.036 i.003 !.034 i.003 !.026 i.002 !.031
.002 !.032 t.002 l l
l i
l i
l 3/7/89
!.010 t.002 !.028 i.002 !.030 i.003 !.016 1.003 !.022 i.002 !.025 i.002 !.026 t.002'l l
l l
.:. ~
- 3/14/89 !.020 t.003 !.023 *.002 !.035 i.003 !.028 t.004 !.027 i.002 !.026 t.002 !.030 i.003 l l
l i
l l
l 3/21/89
!.024 i.002 !.028 i.002 !.038 i.003 !.031 t '.003 !.027 i.002 !.031 i.002 !.037 i.003 l
~
l l
I I
I I
I l 3/28/89 l.014 i.002 !.031 i.002 !.033 i.003 !.024 1.002 !.029 t.002 !.019 i.002 !.028 t.002 l l
l i-l l 4/4/89 l.041 i.006 !.059 +.006 !.031 i.002 !.063 t.008 !.065 i.006 !.051 i.005 !.032 i.003 l l
l
.I I
I I
.I I
I l 4/11/89 !.025 i.003 !.024 t.002 !.028 i.003'!.032 i.004 !.026 i.002 !.008 i.001 !.027 i.003 l l
l 4/18/89
!.027
.003 !.036 i.003 !.039 2.003 !.034 i.004 !.035
.003 !.033 i.003 !.031 t.003 l l
l l
l l
l l 4/25/89 l.024 t.003 !.038
.003 !.038.i.003 !.019 i.003 !.031 t.003 !.031 i.003 !.033 t.003 ; - - -
n.
TABLE 10-WEEKLY CROSS BETA AIR PARTICULATES IN THE LACBWR VICINITY-(Reporting Level = 10 times Control Value) l COLLECTION;LACBWR PLANT l TRAILER COURT!
DAM #8
!GIANOLI FARM ! MALIN FARM lPEDRETTI FARM; LA CROSSE l 8'
CONTROL _!
2 pCi/m oCi/ms pCi/m' pCi/m' pCi/m 8
l DATE pCi/m
- 5/2/s9 l.016_t.002 !.020 t.002 l.023 *.002 l.021 e.004 !.019 i.002 !.020
.002 !.018
.002 !
l l
i l
l 5/9/89
!.019 i.003 !.023 i.002 I.025 i.003 !.029
.004 !.023 t.003 !.020 t.002 !.022 i.002 !
l 5/16/89 !.017 t.003 l.014
.002 !.028 i.003 !.024 t.004 !.026 t.003 !.018 i.002 !.021 i.002_l l
l l
l l
5/23/89 !.022 t.003 !.024 t.002 !.027 i.002 !.025
.003 !.026 t.002 !.023 i.002 !.025 t.002j
! 5/30/89
!.024 t.003 !.023 t.003 !.026 i.002
.027 i.004 !.021 2.002 !.018
.002 !.018 e'.002 l
l l
l 6/6/89 l.021
.003 !.027 i.003 !.034 t.003 l.029 t.004 !.030 i.G03 !.025
.002 !.026
.002 !
I l-I' l 6/13/89 !.015 t.002 !.019
.002 !.025 i.002 !.032 i.004 !.025 r.002 !.018 i.002 !.021 t.002 l l
I' I
l 6/20/89 !.020 i.002 l.014 i.001 !.030 t.002 !.034 i.003 !.027 i.002 !.016 i.002 l.026
.002j l
l 6/27/89
!.031 i.002 !.025 t.003 !.030 t.003 !.018 i.003 !.026 t.002 !.024 i.002 !.025 *.002 j l
l l
l l
I l 7/3/89
!.025 i.003 !.026
.002 !.035 t.003 !.040 t.005 !.C29 i.003 !.026 i.003
.027 i.003 l l
I i
- 7/11/89
!.026 i.003 !.027 t.002 !.048 i.003 !.018 i.003 !.027 i.002 !.015
.002 !.025
.002 !
l l
l
.002
.042 i.003 !.031 t.004 1.030 t.003 !.021 t.002 !.043 t.002 j
- 7/18/89
!.035 t.003 !.030 t
=!
! 7/25/89
!.027 i.003 ! NO SAMPLE !.031 1.003 !.021 1.003 !.027 t.003 l.023 i.002 !.024
.002j l
l l
~
l 8/1/89
!.030 t.003 ! NO SAMPLE !.029 i.003 !.014 t.003 !.025
.002 !.022 i.002 !.024 i.002 j i
l l 8/8/89
!.023 t.003 !.025
.002 !.031 t.002 !.027 i.004 !.028 t.003 l.026 i.002 !.022 *.002 l l
l l
l 8/15/89 !.032 i.004 !.041 i.003 !.038 t.003 !.014
.003 !.052 i.003 !.024 t.003 !.034 *.003_j._
l TABLE 10 WEEKLY GROSS BETA AIR PARTICULATES IN THE LACBVR VICINITY (Reporting Level = 10 times Control Value1 l COLLECTION lLACBWR PLANT l TRAILER COURT l DAM #8 lGIANOLI FARM j MALIN FARM lPEDREITI FARM l LA CROSSE l s
l pCi/m#
CONTROL l l_
DATE l
pCi/m' l
pC1/m l
oCi/m' l
oCf/m' l
pCi/m 3
l l
l l
l l 8/22/89 l.039 t.004 l.034 t.002 !.042 i.003 l.024 t.004 l.028 i.003 l.029 t.003 l.034 i.003 l l
l l
l l
- 8/29/89 l.020 t.003
.023
.002 l.027
.003 ;.020 t.003 l.023 i.003 l.019
.002 l.019 t.002 '
- 9/5/89 l.020 t.002 '.018 t.002 l.027 t.001 l.023
.003 l.022
.002 l.010 t.002 !.021 i.002 ;
l l
l l
l 9/12/89 l.033 i.003 l.025 i.002 l.023 i.002 !.044 t.004 !.033
.003 :.021 i.002 l.021 t.003 l l
l l
l l
l 9/19/89 l.023 i.003 l.014
.002 :.031 i.003 l.032
.004 l.028 2.003 l.025 t.002 l.024 i.002 l
' 9/26/89 l.022 i.003 l.021 i.002 l.032 i.003 l.031 i.004 !.031 t.003 l.023
.002 l.023 i.002 l l
l l
l l
l 10/03/89 '.017
.003 l.017 i.003 l.025 i.003 l.024 t.004 l.022 i.002 l.019 t.002 l.018 t.002 l l
'_10/10/89 !.018 i.003 l.029 i.004 l.024 i.003 '.031 i.004 l.026 1.003 l.017
.002 l.018 t.002 l l
l l
l l
l 10/17/89 l.024 t.003 l.036 t.004 l.033 +.004 !.027 i.004 l.033 i.003 l.029 t.002 '.026
.002 l l
l l
l l
l l
l 10/24/89 l.038 i.003 l.034 i.003 l.042 i.003 l.043
.004 l.042 i.003 l.030
.003 l.041 :.003 l l
l l
l l
l l
l 10/31/89 '.033 i.003 l.037 t.002 l.049 t.003 l.037
.004 l.038
.003 l.037 i.003 l.035 t.003 l l
l l
l l
- 11/07/89 l.024 i.003 l.019 i.002 l.029 i.003 l.020
.003 l.026 i.003 l.022 t.002 l.029
.003 :
l l
l l
l
- 11/13/89 '.016 t.001 l.015
.001 l.024 t.003 '.034 +.003 l.026 i.003 l.024 +.003 l.025
.003_l l
l l
l l
l 11/21/89 l.026 i.003 '.022
.002 l.032 i.002 l.034 i.003 !.036 i.003 l.034 1.003 !.038 i.003 l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l 11/28/89 l.030 t.003 l.023 t.002 l.042 i.003 '.032
.003 l.031 i.002 l.028 i.002 l.039 t.003 ;
12/05/89 l.029 t.003 l.024 i.002 l.037 t.003 l.045 i.004 l.030 t.002 l.035 i.003 !.035 t.004 l l!i=!
i!
i,1fj4 1ll{
p
~
?
l!..ll' l..l..........l......!..!..........!......
3 3
4 3
EL 0
0 0
0 SO 0
0 0
0 SR OT RN t
i i
i CO
- 9 5
3 C
9 A
3 3
3 3
L 0
0 0
0 I!
8 M
R 3
3 3
3 A
0 0
0 0
F' 0
0 0
0 8
I m T/
i i
i t
Ti EC
. 3 5
4 3
6 1
7 0
Rp D
0 0
0 0
E m
P' l!
...e
..8 N
I 2
3 3
3 C
M 0
0 0
0 I
R 0
0 0
0 V
A8
)
Fm R
e
/
t i
i W u N1
- 6 4
2 4
B l IC C
a Lp 2
4 4
3 A V A
0 0
0 0
L M
l E
o
!l..!
.I.8 H r T
t M
4 4
7 4
n R
0 0
0 0
N o A
0 0
0 0
I C
F8 m S
s I/
. i i
E e
Li 0
T m
EC 6
3
- 1 9
1 A
i p
3 4
4 2
L t
A 0
0 0
0 6
E U
I L
C 0.
G 4
B I
1 l!
...e A
T T
R
=
3 3
3 3
A 0
- 0 0
0 P
l 0
0 0
0 e
88 R v
- m I
e
/
i i
i A L Mi AC 3
5 3
6 A
g Dp 4
5 4
3 T
n 0
0 0
0 E
i B
tr l!
e S
o T
S p
R 2
2 2
2 O e U
0 0
0 0
R R O
0 0
0 0
G (
C3 m Y
R/
i
't i
L E1 K
LC 9
5 8
0 E
I p 1
2 1
-2 E
A 0
0 0
0 W
RT l'
e
..8 T
3 3
3 3
N 0
0 0
0 A
0 0
0 0
L8 F m
/
i r
i i
Ri WC 4
5 9
6 Bp 2
3 2
2 C
0 0
0 0
AL'
!! l!
e...
a NO 9
9 9
0 I
8 8
8 9
T
/
/
/ /
CE 2
9 6
2 ET 1
1 2
0 LA
/
/
/
/
LD 2
2 2
1 O
1 1
1 0
C ll.,l*
lll.
...,...,..l.....
.l..l...,...,..;..,.
.f....
I.
~-
h 5
,.i.
o
~
l ! l l l l l l !.il l !.8l.el l :.e!e lllll!ll.
m ES 99 4
4 4
S 88 '
E E
E O //
R 31 C03 9
9 8
2 9
8
//
A11 L00 4
6 6
- ll! i! l!.s! !! l! l! l!
!!.3!
I!.e!.:!
8 99 4
4 4
88 O//
E E
E
^
N3103 5
8 6
M//
8
. 9 9
A11 DD0 6
7 8
!l'
! !! l!
!! l! l! ;!..! !!.9!.e! ;!.e!.
TRC99 4
4 4
88 t //
E E
E 0
31 1L03 6
6 4
T//
8 4
8 A11 R00 5
8 7
T S )
ll'
! l!
1!
!! l!
l!
!!. 9!.e! ;!.!.e!
T *m LU /
4
- 3 4
S i
99~
E C R88 R
p W//
E E
E B31 E
n C03 7
0 2
T i
A//
4 0
0 I
L11' S
s 00 5
1 8
O n 1
P o 1
M i
- ll!
l!
.1 l!
l!
l!
.8!
.i!
l!
~
O t 7'
E C a 4
L r
I99 4
4 4
B E
t T88
~
A T n T//
E E
E T
A e E31 L
c R03 6
2 0
U n D//-
6 0
5 C o E11 I
C P00 5
6 6
T R t
.9!
l!.e!
.l!
!ll! l! l!
i! l! l! l!
A r P
op R e N99 4
4 4
44 36 I R I88
~ E 0 A(
L//
E E
A31 E0 E0 M03 5
6 2
0 0
3 2 4
.//
6 8
- 2. t 1 11 t
P00 4
5 6
< 8' 1
lll! l! l!
.1 l! l! l! l!
l!,$!
l!.i!
I99 4
3 3
L88 O//
E E
E N31 A03 6
7 6
I//
6 1
2 L
G11 E
00 8
1 1
V EL il;! l! l!
1! l l! l!
l!,3!,'
l!
GN I
T L
R NEE R
O 9
0 0
OTT
/
P 1
2 E
IAA S
TDD E
0
/
/
R A
P
/
4 7
CTD O
1 3
3 4
5 ORN T
3 1
1 5
6 LAE O
1 T
S s
s n
n L
S I
I C
C M
Z R
M E
lll!llll1ll!l' l'
ll..lll,3l,.lll,.l.
l R
TABLE 11
~.- ~
.' AIR PARTICULATE COMPOSITE RESULTS
-(Report Concentrations in pCi/m*)
l LOCATION:
.GIANOLI l P. MALIN PEDRETTI i
LACBWR l TRAILER CRTj DAM NO. 8 ; LA CROSSE -j START DATE:
l 01/31/89 l 01/31/89 j' 01/31/89 l 01/31/89 ! 01/31/89 -l- '01/31/89 l 01/31/89-l l
END DATE:
l 02/28/89 l 02/28/89. l L 02/28/89 - ! 02/28/89 l.02/28/89 l 02/28/39.l 02/28/89,-l a.
s l
ISOTOPES /RL*
l 1
l l
I-131/0.9
- <9.44 E-4
- <5.98 E-4
! <5.55_E-4
! <7.26 E-4
! <4.86 E-4
! <6.76 E-4
<S.13 E-4 l
i
! Cs-134/10
! <1.33 E-3
! <6.46 E-4 l <8.99 E-4
! <9.14 E-4
! <5.14 E-4
! <9.53 E-4
<7.20 E-4 l.
l l Cs-137/20
! <1.36 E-3
! <6.90 E-4
! <8.51 E-4
! <9.77 E-4
! <4.84 E-4
! <9.57 E-4
! <6.50 E-4 l
i i
l l
l l
l l
l 1
I i
i i
e.
s t
I I.
i i
i
.i s
r l
l l
l l
l l
1 1
l l
l
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL REM ~
=
.=
i l'
0
. TABLE 11' c
AIR PARTICUIATE COMPOSITE RESULTS (Report Concentrations.in pCi/m')
LOCATION:
l GIANOLI l
P. MALIN l PEDRETTI j.
LACBWR l TRAILER CRTl DAM NO. 8 l 1A CROSSE l START DATE:
l 02/28/89 ! 02/28/89 l 02/28/89 ~l.02/28/89 l '02/28/89 l 02/28/89
-l.
02/28/89 -l-END DATE:
l 03/28/89 j- 03/28/89-l l
03/28/89 l 03/28/89 l 03/28/89 l 03/28/89 l 03/28/89 l l'
t 3
t t
0 8
.t t
t l
ISOTOPES /RL*
e I
i i
I 9
8 t
I t.
l I-131/0.9
!-<3.77 E-3
! <2.44 E-3
! <2.18 E-3
! <2.98 E-3
! <2.03 E-3
! <2.21 E-3
! <2.24 E-3 e
i e
i i
i e-l Cs-134/10
- <1.58 E-3
! <7.79 E-4
! <8.08 E-4
! <1.09 E-3
! <6.74 E-4
! <9.59 E-4
! <8.71 E-4 i
- Cs-137/20
! <1.35 E-3
! <8.44 E-4
! <7.55 E-4
! <1.19 E-3
! <7.94 E-4
! <8.36 E-4
! <9.86 E-4 l
l l
1.60 E-3 l
l l
l l
l l 2n-65 9.38 E-4 l
9 8
8 8
8 0
,0
.i e
i e.
i e
l e
.i
.e n.
t a.
.I t
4 8
8 8
I i
8 i.
e i.
e i.
t I
4 l
e l
t 5
0 t
I O
8 g
i a
3 8
9 8
e i
e e
e e
e
.i e
i.
e.
e.
i.
a e
.e e
e e
e e
i e
i.
i.
e e
i I
t 0
3 I
g e
l
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL REM. - -
. = -
jl li N
l l l ! l l l i l l l Il,f l : !.I !.II l !.9 !.. I b
lll!.
ES 99 4
, 4 43 S88 O//
E E
E E R82 1
C20 7
0 5 40 4
9 9 50
//
A35 L00 5
6 6 7 t
l;l!.
- ! l! l! !!.8!.f! :!.I!.9! l!.8!.:!
8 99 4
4 4
88 O//
E E
E N82 20 6
0 4
M//
2 4
- 0 A35 D00 5
6 7
~
lll!.e! !!
!! ;! l! !!.i!.f! :!.$!
.8! l!.8!
TRG99 4
- 4 4
88 R//
E E
E E82 I// ~
3 7
2 L20 3
5 0
A35 R00 4
5 6
T S )
T 3 lil!
.e ! !!
!! l! !!
.8!.I!
.8!
.0!
L m
U /
. 99
. 4 4
4 S
i E C R88 R
p W//
E E
E B82 E n C20
-5 9
4 T
i A//
7 6
0 I
L35 S
s 00 7
8 8
O n 1
P o
1 M i jjl!
.i!
!! I!
l!
.8!
.t!
9!
l!
.9!
0 O t E
C a 5
L r
I99 4
4 4
B E
t T88
- E A-T n T//
E E
T A
e E82 L c R20 4
7 4
U n D//
9 - 4 9
C o E35 I
C P00 3
5 5
T R
t A
r j;l!
.i! !! I! l! ;! l!.8!
.I: l!.$!
8! !!.9!
P op R e N99 4
4 4
4 4
I R
I88 A (
L//
E E
E E7 E2 A82 0
0 M20 0
5 8 30 10
.6 3 10 30
.//
2 35 P00 4
5 5 7 3
i i
lll!.e! l!
l!
! !! l!.i!.O! l!. $!
.t! l!.9!
I99 4
3 3
L88 O//
E E
E N82 A20 8
4 0
0 3
I//
1 L
G35 E
00 9
1 1
VEL l!l!.i! l!
l! l! !! l!
.t!.,!
l!.3!
.i! l!.t!
GN I
- L T
NEE R
R 9
0 0
O OTT
/
1 2
P IAA S
E TDD E
0
/
/
A P
/
4 7
R CTD O
1 3
3 0
4 ORN T
3 1
1 6
5 LAE O
1 T
S s
s o
n L
S I
I C
C C
H R
M E
R lll'
.lllljllllllil.ell
.g;,,lll.#'
.l
~
l;l' llllllllll e f! l!
l;l.el.el.el.Ol E'
S88
- 3 4
4 S99 O//
E E
E R20 C03 9
4 8
3 7
8
//
A55 L00 2
7 8
lll! !! l! !!
j! l! l!.I! l!
. e!.e!.i!
.8!
8 99 3
4 44 44 88 O//
E E EE EE N20 03 5
7 54 08 0 74 38 M//
1 A55 D00 2
9 95 63 i
i
!ll! !! !! !!
!! l! l!.I! l!.:! l!
.e!.e!. e!
.f!
TRC99 3
.3 4
33 88 R//
E E
E EE E20 L03'
- 0 2
9 61 91 4
0 1
I//
A55 R00 2
1 9
2i T'
t S )
Ill!
I!
i!
l!
l!
8! l!
.e!
i!
.e!
.e!
.i!
.f!
TL 'm U /
S i
99 3
3 3
E C RS8 R
p W//
E E,
E B20 E n C03 3
5 7
T i
A//
7 0
1 I
L55 S
s 00~
2 1
1 O n 1
P o
1 M i lll!
l!
1!
!1 !!
l!
l!
.9!
l!
.e!
I!.!.e!
.e!.i!
O t 1
E C a L
r I99 3
4 4
5 B
E t
T88 A
T n
T//
E.
-E E
T A
e E20 L
c R03 2
6 8
U n D//
1 1
8 C o E55 I
C P00 2
7 7
T R t A
r jll! l! l!
j!
l! j!.1! !!.i! !!
.I!
P op R e N99 3
4 4
I R
I88 A (
L//
E E
.E A20 M03' 1
4 6
4 5
7
//
. 55 P00 2
7 8
l!l! 1! !! !!
l! l! j!.I! !!
9!
I99 3
3 3
L88
- E E
O//
E N20 A03 6
7 6
I//
0 4
4 L
G55 00 4
1 1
E VEL lll! l! l! !! l! l! l!
.,l l!
. i!,g!
GN I
- L T
R NEE R
OTT
/
9 0
0 O
IAA S
1 2
P TDD E
0
/
/
E A
P
/
4 7
R CTD O
1 3
3 4
5 ORN T
3 1
1 5
6 LAE O
1 T
S s
s n
n L
S I
I C
C M
Z R
M ER llll!lll!lllllll.Il!l.,ll;..'
.,:..l,I!
~s
']
y l.
. ~
-TABLE 11
~
AIR PARTICUIATE COMPOSITE RESULTS (Report Concentrations in pCi/m ).
3 l
LOCATION:
GIANOLI P. MALIN l PEDRETTI j.
LACBWR l TRAILER CRT! DAM NO. 8 i LA CROSSE j l START DATE:
I 05/30/89 l 05/30/89 l~ 05/30/89 ! 05/30/89 ; 05/03/89 j' 05/30/89 l 05/30/89 l
l END DATE:
l 07/03/89 l 07/03/89 l 07/03/89 l 07/03/89 l 07/03/89 'l 07/03/89 l 07/03/89 l l
l l
l l
ISOTOPES /RL*
3 I
i 8
8.
O 9
9' 8
l I-131/0.9
! <1.05 E-3
! <4.91 E-4
! <4.47 E-4'
! <6.65 E-4
! <4.57 E-4
! <4.40 E-4
<4.63 E-4 l
I I
I I
I I
I e
l_ Cs-134/10
! <1.26 E-3
! <7.03 E-4
! <4.94 E-4
! <8.11 E-4
! <6.06 E-4
! <6.58 E-4
! <5.56 E ~ l I
I t
9 e
f 8
j Cs-137/20
! <1.29 E-3
! <6.57 E-4
! <6.42 E-4 1 <9.46 E-4
! <6.28 E-4
! <6.35 E-4
! <5.65 E-4^
l l
j j
j j
j l
l 7.92 E-4 l;
i l Co-60 l
3.46 E-4 l
i l
l 1
i
!~
l
.i.
i l
l l
l l
l i
f i
f 8
9 I
f I
l L
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
t, l
l l
i i
i l
i-l i
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL I
REM S2 -
l i
(,
.~.u--
m
-~
^
-r
,y
. 4.-
u; :;
LTABLE 11
. AIR PARTICULATE C(MPOSITE RESULTS 8
'(Report Concentrations in pCi/m )
l LOCATION:
j GIANOLI l
P. MALIN l PEDRs m l LACBWR l-TRAILER CRT! DAM NO. 8-l LA CROSSE.l l START DATE:
l 07/03/89 l '07/03/89 l 07/03/89 ! 07/03/89' l 07/03/89- ; 07/03/89 l 08/03/89 l l
END DATE:
l 08/01/89 l 08/01/89 l 08/01/89 l 08/01/89 l 08/01/89 l 08/01/89 l 08/01/89-l l
l l
i
- ISOTOPES /RL*
l i
l l
l I-131/0.9
! <5.65 E-3 l <3.12 E-3 l <5.08 E-a
! <4.73 E-3
! <8.70 E-4 l <6.27 E-4 l <5.54 E-4 l
l
!^
I l
l l
I Cs-134/10 l <1.37 E-3
! <6.19 E-4
! <6.00 E-4
! <9.62 E-4
! <1.12 E-3
! <6.62 E-4
! <1.05 E-2 l
l l
l
.l l
l l Cs-137/20 l <1.40 E-3 i <6.58 E-4
! <6.63 E-4
! <9.77 E-4
! <1.14 E-3 ~! <7.31 E-4
! <8.3A E-4 l
l l
l j
l 1.19 E-3 l
1.14 E-3 l-
! i8.83 E-4 l
! ti.31 E-3 l
l Co-60 l
l l
l-l l
l l
t i
e i
i.
i.
e.
e i
i i
e.
i i.
i l
l 1
l 8
i f
a b
f 8
0 f
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
1 l
l l
l i
e i
e e
e l
l l
i l
l l
l 1
l e
e i
e i
e l
l
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL REM i
=
4 r
u
.1
~ '
TABLE 11-AIR PARTICULATE COMPOSITE RESULTS i
(Report Concentrations in pC1/m )
8 t
LOCATION:
GIANOLI l
P. MALIN. l.PEDRETTI - '
!. TRAILER CRT! DAM NO. 8.l LA CROSSE l-l START DATE:
l 08/01/89 l 08/01/89' ' 08/01/89 l 08/01/89 l '08/01/89 l 08/01/89 08/01/89 !
l END DATE:
l' 08/29/89 l 08/29/89' l 08/29/89' ! ~08/29/89, l 08/29/89 l :08/29/89. l 08/29/89.. -l.
l l-l ISOTOPES /RL*
l l
I i
i-l I-131/0.9
! <5.88 E-3
! <5.53 E-4
! <5.11 E-4
! <5.45 E-3.. ;
i 1
! <5.15 E-4
! <3.80 E-3
! <6.14 E-4
- i. ~
i i
! <8.90 E ! <5.71 E-4
! <6.28 E-4
! <6.95 E-4 l'
l Cs-134/10
! <9.57 E-4
! <7.23 E-4
! <7.44 E-4 e
e i
e i
l Cs-137/20
<1.55 E-3
! <1.26 E-3
! <1.08 E-3
! <1.34 E-3
! <9.54 E-4
! <9.14 E-4
! <1.09 E-3 l
l l
l S.81 E-4 l
l l
l l
l:
l Zn-65
! 9.81 E-4 l
8
.i 8
8
-.I e
i f
e-
- i l
e e
l i.
9 i
t t
8.
t l
~.
t i
e e
i e
e l
l t.
i e
i e
l 1
t
.i
.e i
i i
l l
l l
l
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL l
REM !
I
~ -
=
~
- c. _
e TABLE 11 AIR' PARTICULATE COMPOSITE RESULTS-(Report Concentrations in pCi/m )
3 LOCATION:
l GIANOLI l
P. MALIN !
PEDRETTI IACBWR l TRAILER CRTj-DAM NO. 8 ' LA CROSSE I l START DATE:
l 08/29/89 l~ 08/29/89' l 08/29/89 l1 08/29/89 ' l 08/29/89 - l' 08/29/89 l 08/29/89 l l
END DATE:
. j 10/03/89 10/03/89. l 10/03/89 l-10/03/89 l
10/03/89 l 10/07/89 l
10/03/89 l l
l ISOTOPES /RL*
- l l
l l
l l
l l-l I-131/0.9
! <1.06 E-3
! <5.06 E-4
! <4.10 E ! <5.77 E-4
! <4.50 E-4 ' I <4.97 E-4
! <4.72 E-4 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l Cs-134/10
! <1.50 E-3
! <6.75 E-4
! <6.12 E-4
! <8.34 E-4
! <5.10 E-4
! <5.46 E-4
! <5.38 E-4 l
l l
l l
l l
l l Cs-137/20
! <1.57 E-3
! <S.'48 E-4
! <7.76 E-4
! <1.13 E-3
! <7.46 E-4
! <8.34 E-4
! <8.07 E-4 l
l l
l l
l i
l l
l l
f l
-l-l l
l l
l l
l l
l'
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL 3g3
_ ss _
m mt m
m A.
--..m r.
m ma.-
- . i-
.m a
p.
TABLE 11 AIR' PARTICULATE COMPOSITE RESULTS 3
(Report Concentrations in pC1/m )
l IDCATION:
l GIANOLI l
P. MALIN l PEDRETTI :
l START DATE:
l 10/03/89 l 10/03/89 l '10/03/89 'l 10/03/89 l 10/03/89 l 10/03/89 l-10/03/89 l '-
l END DATE:
l '10/31/89 l
10/31/89-l 10/31/89.l 10/31/89 l 10/31/89 10/31/89 10/31/89-l-l l
ISOTOPES /RL*
l l
! <5.39 E-4
! <6.75 E-4
! <5.49 E-4 l
l I-131/0.9
! <9.23 E-4
<5.86 E-4
! <3.17 E-3
! <5.42 E-3 l
l l.
l l
l Cs-134/10
! <1.39 E-3
! <8.99 E-4
' <6.07 E-4
! <8.90 E-4
! <7.98 E-4
! <7.21 E-4 i <7.85 E-4 l
a 4
l Cs-137/20
! <1.22 E-3
! <8.44 E-4
! <6.01 E-4
! <9.93 E-4
! <3.23 E-3
! <3.46 E-3
! <3.27 E-3 l
l l-l 1
l l
l l
l-l l
l l
l l
l l
l I
l l
l l
l l
I l
l 1
l l
I l
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL RDI l l
=.
=
=
~
4 l..
' TABLE 11 AIR PARTICULATE COMPOSITE RESULTS (Report Concentrations in pCi/m )
3 i
LOCATION:
GIANOLI P. MALIN.
FEDRETTI
-l LACBWR l TRAILER CRTl DAM NO. 8 i LA CROSSE'!
l START DATE:
l 10/31/89 10/31/89' l 10/31/89 l ~10/31/89 l 10/31/89; ;
10/31/89 l 10/31/89 l l
END DATE:
l 11/28/89 j. 11/28/89 !
11/28/89 l
11/28/89 l 11/28/89 !!
11/28/89~ j '11/28/89 l i
e e
e l
ISOTOPES /RL*
l l'
l-i i.
e i
e e
I-131/0.9
! <S.23 E-3
! <3.46 E-3
! <3.27 E-3
! <8.36 E-4
! <2.33 E-3
! <S.08 E-4 '! <3.55 E-3 l
I i
i i
Cs-134/10
! <1.07 E-3
! <6.64 E-4
! <5.93 E-4
! <9.69 E-4
! <4.29 E-4
! <7.14 E-4
! <6.98 E-4 l
l Cs-137/20
! <1.02 E-3
! <7.63 E _! <6.49 E-4
- <1.18 E-3
! <4.89 E-4. l l
I-l l
-l I
I
! <7.65 E-4
! <7.58 E-4' l
i 5
1 I
t I
e f
9 l
l l
l I.
I.
l e
i
.e e
e l
I f
9 9
f t
0 i
e i
e i
e l
l i
t 8
1 I
i 1
9 9
9 l
l l
l l
l.
l l
l l
1 l
l l
l l
l t
9 I
f f
9 9
8 l
i e
i e
i e
e e
l l
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL REM
~..
TABLE 11 AIR PARTICULATE COMPOSITE RESULTS (Report Concentrations in pCi/m )
8 l
LOCATION:
GIANOLI P.-MALIN -l PEDRETTI ;.LACBWR j TRAILER CRT! DAM NO. 8 : LA CROSSE l l START DATE:
l 11/28/89 11/28/89 l.11/28/89 j' 11/28/89 l
11/28/89.;
11/28/89 l 11/28/89l l l
END DATE:
l 01/02/90 l 01/02/90- l 01/02/90 l 01/02/90 ! 01/02/90 l 01/02/90 l. 01/02/90 l l
l-l l
- ~
i l
l ISOTOPES /RL*
l l
l I-131/0.9
! <8.17 E-4
! <4.33 E-4_ l <4.00 E-3'
! <7.18 E-4
! <4.25 E-4
! <3.86 E-3
! <6.58 E-4 l'
I
-l I
I.
I
.. I
- Cs-134/10
! <1.11 E-3
! <6.50 E-4
! <5.15 E-4 ~! <8.52 E-4
! <4.54 E-4
! <5.24 E-4
! <8.58 E-4 l
l l
I l
l
-I I
I I
l Cs-137/20
! <1.05 E-3 ~! <6.93 E-4
! <5.96 E-4
! <9.31 E-4
! <4.67 E-4
! <5.81 E-4
! <8.49 E-4 l
l l
l l
l
! 3.35 E-3 l
l Co-60
! tl.11 E-3 l
i.
i i
e e
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
e e
i i
e e
e e
e
,i
-l l
l i
i e
i e
e l
l l
l l
l l
3 4
I 9
4 9
9 9
9 i
e i
e i
i e
I t
1 I
t 8
9 8
l
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL REM.
, _. _ _ _... _. _. _. _ _ _. ~ _ _
- s_.
TABLE 12
.1 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATER IN THE VICINITY OF LACBWR (Report Concentrations _in pCi/ Liter) l l SAMPLE #1 l SAMPLE #2 l SAMPLE #3 l SAMPLE #1 l SAMPLE #2 l SAMPLE'#3 j.
' COLLECTION DATE: ;
01/03/89 l
01/03/89 01/03/89 l
01/31/89 l
01/31/89 l
01/31/89 l
l SAMPLE LOCATION: l VICTORY l
OUTFALL l
DAM #8' l-VICTORY l
OUTFALL DAM #8 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
ISOTOPES /RL*
l l
l l
l
< 1501 1
< 1501 l
< 1501 l
l l
I l
< 1406
< 1496
< 1496 l
l l
l l
l l Mn-54/1000 l
< 7.15
< 8.83 l'
< 7.77
< 7.50 1
< 7.95
< 7.85^
l l
l i
l l
i l
l Fe-59/400
<18.2
<21.0
<19.8
<17.4
<15.9
<20.6 l
i l Co-58/1000
< 6.99 l
< 6.42
< 7.52
< 7.25
< 7.67 l
< 7.09 l
l l
l l
l I
I l
l Co-60/300 l
<15.3
<15.5
<15.3 l
<14.7
<14.5
<15.4 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
Zn-65/300
! 14.2 11.4
<16.8
'<18.2 l
<19.0
<19.7 i
<20.7 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l Zr-95/400
< 12.9 l
<13.3
<13.4
<13.5 1
<13.3 l
<15.5
.I l
l 1
l l
l l
< 7.21
< 7.76
< 8.25 l
l Nb-95/400 l
< 7.63
< 7.6 l
< 7.56 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
I-131/5
< 6.07
< 6.4 l
< 5.71 l
< 5.71 l
< 6.45 l
< 6.40 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
Cs-134/30
< 7.56
< 7.98 l
< 7.21
< 7.39
< 7.21
< 8.77 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l Cs-137/50
< 8.70
< 7.51
< 8.30 l
< 8.0
< 7.66
< 7.36-l I
I l
l l
l Ba-140/200
<28.8 i
<30.00
<31.00
<30.5
<30.1
<31.0 l
l l
l l
l-l l
l La-140/200
<10.6
< 9.09
< 8.07
< 8.23
<10.0
< 9.43 l
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL REM..
~
=
4
- 4 24 "
TABLE 12 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATER IN THE VICIMITY OF LACBWR (Report Ccncentrations in pCi/ Liter) l
- SAMPLE #1
.; SAMPLE #2
- SAMPLE #3 l SAMPLE #1
- SAMPLE #2
- . SAMPLE #3 l
l COLLECTION DATE: ;
02/28/89 l
02/28/89 l
02/28/89 l
04/04/89 04/04/89 l
04/04/89 l
l SAMPLE LOCATION: l VICTORY l
OUTFALL j
DAM #8 l
VICTORY l
OUTFALL
'l DAM #8 l
l i
l ISOTOPES /RL*
l l
l l
l l
1 l-i l
< 1496
< 1496
< 1496
< 1528
< 1528
< 1528 l
l l
l Mn-54/1000
< 6.66 l 9.19 +/-4.08 !
< 8.13
<10.4
<10.0-
< 9.64 l
l l
l i
i l'
I I
l Fe-59/400
'l
< 1.67 l
< 1.88
< 1.67
<14.3
<19.8
<16.7 l
l l
l l
l l
l Co-58/1000
< 6.47
< 7.35
< 8.35
< 7.57
< 7.60
< 7.58 l
l l
l l
i
- Co-60/300 l
< 1.35
< 1.45
< 1.54
<13.5
<13.5
<14.6 l
l i
j Zn-65/300
< 2.34
< 1.70 1
< 1.95
<19.0
<17.8 l
<19.6 l
l Zr-95/400
< 1.34
< 1.21
< 1.25~
<14.2
<12.5
<14.5
?
l l
~
l l
l l Nb-95/400
< 7.86
< 7.12 l
< 6.66
< 7.30
< 7.41
< 8.20 l
l l
l l
l E-131/5
< 6.40
< 5.61
< 5.34
< 6.02
< 5.39
< 6.72 l
l l
l l
! Cs-134/30
< 8.46
< 7.30
< 7.02 _ !
< 8.46
< 7.90 1
< 8.23 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l Cs-137/50 l
< 8.04
< 8.20
< 7.32 l
< 7.46
< 7.35
< 8.21 l
l l
l
'l l
l I
I l
Ba-140/200
< 2.86 l'
< 2.98
< 2.66
<30.5
<31.0 --
<31.8 l
l l
.l l
'< 1.09
< 9.88
< 7.47
< 8.93 l
l l Ia-140/200
< 1.03
< 9.11 i
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL REM.
_.-----.-----_c--------_
i
.,g TABLE 12 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATER IN THE VICINITY OF LACBWR (Report Concentrations in pCi/ Liter) l l SAMPLE #1 l. SAMPLE #2 l SAMPLE #3 j. SAMPLE #1 l SAMPLE #2 l SAMPLE #3 l-l l COLLECTION DATE: l _05/02/89 l
05/02/89 l 05/02/89 j
06/06/89 l
06/06/89 06/06/89 l
- SAMPLE LOCATION
- !
VICTORY l
.OUTFALL l
DAM #8 l
VICTORY l
OUTFALL l
DAM #8 l
i l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l ISOTOPES /RL*
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l H-3
< 1576
'< 1576
_< 1576
< 1568
< 1568
< 1568 j'
l l
l l
l l
l l
l Mn-54/1000 1
< 7.53
< 7.36
< 8.26
< 7.39
< 7.45
< 9.12 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l Fe-59/400
<20.1
<18.9
<18.8
<19.5
<18.8
<19-3 l
l l
l l
< 7.95
< 6.99
< 7.32 l
l l
l l
l Co-58/1000
< 7.17
< 6.43
< 8.35 l
l
'l l
l l
l l
l Co-60/300
<15.2
<15.7
<15.0
<15.3 l
<15.6
<15.4 j
l l
l l Zn-65/300
<15.9
<16.0
<15.1
<18.0
<16.7
<16.3 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l Zr-95/400 i
<11.5
<13.5
<14.2
<12.6
<13.7
<13.4 i
I I
1 3
0 t
I t
l Nb-95/400
< 7.42
< 8.90
< 6.89
< 7.97
< 6.75
< 7.30 l
l l
1 l-l l
l l
l I-131/5
< 5.87
< 6.45
< 6.45
< 5.92
< 6.63
< 5.56 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l Cs-134/30
< 7.56
< 6.73
< 7.56
< 8.31
< 8.38 l
< 8.31' l
l l
l l
l l
I t
l Cs-137/50
< 8.30
< 7.25
< 7.56
< 7.32
< 7.57
< 7.50 l
l l
l l
I l
l l
l Ba-140/200
<28.8
<27.3
<31.8
<30.1
<31.0
<30.1 l
l l
l l
l l
La-140/200
<'8.59
<10.2
<10.3
< 8.94 l-
< 9.42
< 8.25 l
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL REM -
' TABLE 12' l
l RESULTS OF ANALYSIS:OP MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATER IN THE VICINITY OF LACBWR
.(Report. Concentrations in pC1/ Liter) l l SAMPLE #1' l SAMPLE #2 l. SAMPLE #3 l SAMPLE #1
} SAMPLE #2 l SAMPLE #3 l
(
l COLLECTION DATE: l 07/03/89 l
07/03/89 l-07/03/89 l 08/08/89'
- .08/08/89 l '08/08/89 l
1 l SAMPLE LOCATION: l VICTORY OUTFALL l
DAM #8 l
VICTORY l
OUTFALL DAM #8.
'l
~l l
i I
l ISOTOPES /RL*
j.
l l
l l
l l
l l
l H-3 405 465 773 491 330 447 l
l l
l l
l l
l l Mn-54/1000
< 7.65
< 7.33
< 7.50
< 6.66
< 9.12
< 7.84 l
l l
l l'
l Fe-59/400
<19.9
<19.0
<18.2
<16.9
<21.2
<15.5 l
j l
l l
l l
I
! Co-58/1000 1
< 6.94
< 7.05
< 7.38
< 7.28
< 7.88-
< 8.50 l
l l
1 l
l l
l Co-60/300 l
<14.1
<15.6
<14.1
<13.8
<12.4
<14.0 l
l l
l l-l l Zn-65/300
<16.0
<16.3
<14.5
<18.8
<15.7
<19.6 l
3 l
l l
l i
l l
l
<17.6
<12.7
<11.1
<12.6 l
l l Zr-95/400 l
<17.0
<17.2 l
l j
l Nb-95/400
< 7.43
< 6.92
< 7.03
< 7.06
< 7.13
< 6.82-l l
l l
I l
l l
l l
1-131/5
< 5.61
< 5.66
< 6.17
< 6.02
< 6.49
< 6.54 l
l l
l l-l l
l l
l l Cs-134/30
< 7.65
< 7.98
< 7.82
< 7.56
< 8.07
< 8.23
_l l
l l
l l
l l Cs-137/50
< 8.16
< 7.20
< 8.19
< 8.17
< 7.23
< 7.40 l
l l
l l Ba-140/200 1
<28.2
<27.7-
<31.0
<31.4
<31.0
<34.9 l
l l
l i.
l l
l l
La-140/200
<12.4
~<10.9 l
< 7.49
< 9.24
~!
< 8.22
< 6.41 l
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL REM *
... s 4
TABLE 12 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATER IN THE VICINITY OF IACBWR (Report Concentrations in pCi/ Liter)
- SAMPLE #1 i SAMPLE #2 i SAMPLE #3 l SAMPLE #1 l SAMPLE #2
- SAMPLE #3 l-l COLLECTION DATE
- l 09/05/89 l
09/05/89.
09/05/89 j' 10/03/89 10/03/89 l.10/03/89
-l 5
l SAMPLE LOCATION: l OUTFALL l
VICTORY DAM #8
.l OUTFALL l
VICTORY DAM #8' l
l l
l l
i l-l l
l l
ISOTOPES /RL*
l l
i l
l l
H-3 582 193 324 424
< 277 498 l
l
'I l
l I
j' l Mn-54/1000
< 8.08
< 6.69
< a.13
< 6.79
< 7.28
< 8.26 l
l l
l l
l
~<18.0 l
<20.6
<16.6 j.
l l
l l
Fe-59/400
<18.7
<20.7
<18.8 l
l l
l l
l l
l co-58/1000
< 8.35
< 7.20
< 7.12
< 6.82
< 7.79
< 7.55 l
l l
l l
l l
l l Co-60/300
<13.9
<14.3
<13.5
<18.5
<18.7
<18.5 l
l l
l l
.I I
l l
l Zn-65/300
<18.4
<17.6
<20.1 l'
<16.9
<18.5
<18.7 l
l l
l l
l 3
l l
l Zr-95/400
<12.6
<11.9
<12.3
<13.1
<12.4
<13.1 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l Nb-95/400
! '< 8.77
< 7.13-
< 8.25
< 7.13
< 6.49 l
< 7.81 l
l l
l l
l l
l I
l I-131/S
< 6.26
< 5.86
< 6.45
< 6.17
< 5.39
< 5.77 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l Cs-134/30
! < 7.82
< 7.39 l'
< 8.77
< 7.30
< 6.53
< 8.31 l
l l
l l
l-I l-l Cs-137/50
< 7.67
< 7.38
< 8.11
< 7.77
< 7.24
< 8.00 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l Ba-140/200
<27.7
<30.1
<29.7
<32.2'
<34.1
<30.5 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l La-140/200
< 8.94
< 9.11
< 7.69
<10.6
< 8.92
< 9.27 l
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL REM -. = _. =.. -,_-_ _.
- - = - -
<s l
.:.A TABLE 12 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATER IN THE VICINITY OF LACBWR (Report Concentrations in pCi/ Liter) i l~
l SAMPLE #1 l SAMPLE #2 l SAMPLE #3 l SAMPLE #1 l SAMPLE #2 l SAMPLE #3 l COLLECTION DATE: ;
11/07/89' l
11/07/89 l
11/07/89 12/05/89 l
12/05/89 12/05/89-l l SAMPLE LOCATION:'l OUTFALL l
VICTORY l
DAM #8.
l OUTFALL l
VICTORY l
DAM #8
.l l
l l
l l
l l
l ISOTOPES /RL*
l l
l l
! H-3 352 457
'663
$09 375 095 l
l l
l l
- Mn-54/1000 4.86+/-3.14 !
< 7.36
< 6.84
< 7.41
< 7.42
< 8.16 l
l l
l l
l l Fe-59/400
< 16.0
< 20.6
< 18.8
< 16.7
< 21.3
< 70.1 i
l l
l l
l l
l l Co-58/1000
< 7.18
< 7.27
< 7.53
< 7.80
< 6.82
< 6.82 l
l l
l l
i l Co-60/300
< 16.0
< 16.1
< 15.8
< 14.9
< 13.3
< 14.7 l
l l
l l
l l
l 2n-65/300
< 19.5
< 16.8
< 19.7
< 23.0
< 23.4
< 16.6 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l Zr-95/400
< 13.9
< 12.9
< 13.7
< 12.7
< 13.3
< 10.8 l
l l
l l
l l
l j
l Nb-95/400
< 7.98
< 7.31
< 7.12
< 6.69
< 7.97
< 7.28 I
l l-l l
1 l
I-131/5
< s.87
< 6.40
< 6.21
< 5.87
< 5.66
< 6.54 l
l l
l l
l l
l-l Cs-134/30
< 8.23
~!
< 7.56
< 7.82
< 7.98
< 8.15
< 8.31 l
l l
l l-l Cs-137/50
< 8.00
< 8.00
< 7.74
< 7.98
< 8.30 l
< 7.83 l
l l
l Ba-140/200
< 28.8
< 30.5
< 29.2
< 31.8
< 29.7
< 29.6 l
l l
l La-140/200
< 8.23
< 8.25
< 8.06
< 9.72 i
< 9.26
< 7.70 l
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL REM !
~.
e.*
6 l-TABLE 13 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER SEDIMENT IN THE VICINITY OF LACBWR (Report Concentration in pCi/Kg) l l SAMPLE #1 l SAMPLE #2 l SAMPLE #3 l SAMPLE #1 l SAMPLE #2 l SAMPLE #3
.l l COLLECTION DATE: l 06/09/89 l 06/09/89
! 06/09/89 l.10/10/89 l
10/10/89 l
10/10/89 l
! SAMPLE LOCATION: l UPSTREAM l
OUTFALL l D0lMSTREAM ! UPSTREAM l
OUTFALL l DOWNSTREAM l
l l
l l
l i
l l
ISOTOPES l Cs-134
< 10.7
< 14.0
< 19.0
<12.3
< 17.S
< 18.2 i.
S0.4
< 9.00
!2.74E+3+/-35.3! 31.9 i 8.78 l
'. 1.73 E+3 l Cs-137
< 8.32 i
!1.91E+3+/-34.0!
l
! 1.45 E+3 l Co-60 l
l l
l j
l i
i l
l REM - -
_m y
i c
"g.
TABLE 14 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF MILK SAMPLES IN THE VICINITY OF LACBWR (Report Concentrations in pCi/ Liter) j SAMPLE l COLLECTION !
ISOTOPES / REPORTING LEVEL l
l LOCATION !
pDATE l
I-131/6 l Cs-134/60 i Cs-137/60 l
Ba-140/300 : La-140/300 :
l l
t l
l l P.MALIN l 01/10/89 i
< 6.67
< 9.89
< 7.86 l
< 34.9
<10.5 l-l l A. MALIN l 02/07/89
< 6.81 i
< 7.21
< 8.54 l
< 33.4
< 9.27 l PEDRETTI l 03/07/89
< 7.06
< 6.53
< 8.90
< 30.5
< 8.43 l
l l
A. MALIN 04/12/89 l
< 6.31
< 7.90 i
< 8.05
< 31.8
< 8.24-l l
l P. MALIN l 04/12/89
< 5.28 l
< 7.56
< 7.85
-< 34.5
< 10.0 j PEDRETTI l 04/11/89
< 6.58 l
< 7.90
< 7.88
< 29.7
< 9.58 j A. MALIN l 04/26/89
<17.5 l
< 8.07
< 8.30 l
< 28.8
<11.9 l
l l P. MALIN l 04/26/89 i
< 6.12 1
< 7.30
< 8.43
< 33.0
< 8.06 p
l PEDRETTI l 04/25/89 l
o< 5.71
< 7.98 i
< 8.39
< 32.2
< 9.72 l
l l
l A. MALIN l 05/10/89
< 6.89 l
< 7.11
< 8.01
< 33.7 l
< 9.10 l P. MALIN 05/10/89 l
< 6.58 l
< 7.39
< 7.88
< 31.0 l
<10.6 l
l PEDRETTI ; 05/10/89 l
< 5.58
< 6.80
< 7.81 l
< 32.2 l
<10.0 i
l l A. MALIN l 05/24/89 l
< 6.02 l
< 7.39
< 8.66
< 29.3
< 8.43 l
l P. MALIN l 05/24/89 l
< 6.31 l
< 7.30
< 8.90 l
< 29.6
< 8.94 l
l PEDRETTI l 05/24/89 l
< 6.81
< 8.69 l
< 9.78 l
< 30.5
< 9.88 l
l A. MALIN l 06/15/89 l
< 6.35 l
< 7.02
<11.0
< 27.9
< 7.48 l
l P. MALIN l 06/15/89 l
< 6.40 l
< 7.21
<11.0 l
< 31.4 l
< 9.41 l
l l
l PEDRETTI l 06/14/89 i
< 5. 87 '
l
< 8.07
<11.3 l
< 32.6
< 8.43 l
l A. MALIN l 06/27/89 l
< 6.45' l
< 8.31
< 8.78
< 29.7
<10.7 l P. MALIN l 06/28/89 l
< 5.87 l
< 7.39 l
< 8.30 l
< 33.7 l
<10.3 l
i l
l PEDRETTI l 06/27/89 l
< 6.45
<-7.82
< 7.50 l
< 33.7 l
< 6.64 l
l l
l A. MALIN l 07/11/89 l
< 6.54 l
< 7.98 l
< 8.19 l
< 31.4
?
< 7.87 l
l l P. MALIN l 07/11/89 l
< 5.71
< 8.69
< 8.35
< 34.5 l
< 9.42 l
l l PEDRETTI l 07/11/89
< 6.02
< 6.52
< 7.64 l
< 29.7 l
<10.3 l
l A. MALIN l 07/25/89
- l
<16.0-
<20.8
<58.5 i
< 69.9
<21.7 l
l P. MALIN ! 07/25/89 l
< 6.45 -
l
< 7.82
< 7.53 l
< 33.4 l
< 8.05 l
l PEDRETTI l 07/25/89
< 6.45
< 7.30
< 8.09 l
< 33.5 l
< 9.09 l
l 1
l I
l l
l l
- SAMPLES COUNTED ON HOTLAB GELI. ENV GELI OOC AT TIME OF COUNTING 4
REM -
e- -.
.--'-_ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _. - - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ -. _ _ _ _ -. _.. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ -. -. = _ =, - _ -.. -
.~
.,. ~
l
,l!
- ![
I 4
3 fllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll f
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l 003
/
1 3
8 3
9 9
7 6
0 2
4 2
7 4
0 4
4 3
8 0
4 8
5 4
6 7
7 1
9 9
9 0
2 3
3 4
1 8
9 0 9
0 9
9 8
7 0
0 8
9 8
8 8
8 0
0 7
1 1
1 1
1 1
R a < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
W L
B C
A l
l ll l
l l
l l
l L
0 F
L 0 y
O E
3 V
/
8 5 2 7
7 4
0 3
2 1
0 4 2 8
8 7
0 8
1 1
Y E 0 T
L 4 8
0 0 9 9
1 1
6 2
0 1
1 9
8 1
9 1
1 4
1 I
1 2
3 3
2 2
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 2
2 3
2 3
3 3
3 N )
G I
r N a < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
C e
I B
I t
T V
i R
L O
l l
l t
l l
l l
E
/
P H
1 E
T C R 0 p
/
6 N
S
/
7 5
7 3
0 1
6 4
7 0
0 6
1 2
6 2
2 3
I n
E 7
4 8
1 4
3 0
6 8
1 0
6 3
8 6
5 3
2 8
4 0
i P 3 S
O 1
8 7
8 8
8 9
8 7
8 8
7 7
9 0
0 8
8 7
8 8
4 E
s T
1 1
1 L
n O s < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
P o
S C 7
E M i I
6 j
L A
t B
S a
l 1
1 l
l l
l l
l l
A r
T K
t w
L n
0 I
e 6
M c
/
6 0
3 0
2 3
2 0
1 7
1 3
3 0
2 9
5 2
3 n
4 4
2 8
4 6
7 8
9 1
0 1
7 7
2 1
6 3
1 6
5 F
o 3
O C 1
8 9 6 6
8 7
7 7
7 8
7 6
6 9
1 9
7 8
8 7
1 S
t s < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
I r
C S
o Y
p L
e l
l l
l l
l i
l l
l l
l A R
~
N (
A 6
F
/
0 0
2 4
7 7
5 5
6 7
7 8
6 2
3 7
2 5
7 6
O 1
5 1
7 5
7 8
8 3
6 1
8 5
2 7
6 8
8 8
1 9
3 S
1 5
7 6
6 5
5 6
6 5 6
5 6
6 6
6 5
5 6
6 6
T L
I U
SE R
j!
l l:
l!
i l
l l
l l
l NO 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 r
I 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 TE
/
//
/
/
////
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
CT 5
4 5
9 9
9 2
2 2
6 6
6 0
0 0
4 4
4 4
2 EA 1
1 1
2 2
2 1
1 1
2 2
2 1
1 1
2 2
2 1
m LD
///
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
v Lp 8
8 8
8 8
8 9
9 9
9 9
9 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
2 O
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
C l!
l
!l l
l l
l l
l ll l
l l
l N N N I N N I N N I N N I N N I N N I N N EO I
I r
I I
r I I
r I I
T I
I r I I
T I
I LI L L r L L r L L r L L T L L r L L T L L
PT A A t A A s A A a A A E A A a A A E A A MA M M R M M R M M R M M R M M R M M R M M AC D
D D
D D
DE E
. E
. E
. E
. E SO M
APPAPPAPP_APPAP L
A_ P PA P P E
R lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll s
/c
~ y.
~
TABLE 15..;
- - 4 FISH SAMPLE ACTIVITY IN THE VICINITY OF LACBWR
'(Report Concentrations in.pCi/Kg)-
l
- SAMPLE-#1 l SAMPLE #2 l. 06/08/89
-l 06/08/89 09/08/89 l 09/08/89 l~
SAMPLE #1 l SAMPLE #2
- SAMPLE #1
- SAMPLE #2 j.
l COLLECTION:DATE:
03/28/89-l 03/28/89 l
l FISH SPECIES:
! SHEEPHEAD l SHEEPHEAD l
CARP
! WALLEYE l-CARP
! WALLEYE l
l
~
i l
ISOTOPES /RL*
l l
l l
l l
l l
t
! Mn-54/3E4
< 11.5 l
< 13.0
< 12.8
!~
< 16.5
< 11.0
< 12.3 i
l i
I-I l Fe-59/IE4
< 29.8
< 26.6
< 35.6
< 41.2
< 35.6
< 31.7' e
9 9
I I
8 l Co-58/3E4
< 10.1
< 10.4
< 10.1
< 17.3
< 13.0
< 11.2 e
i e
- Co-60/IE4
< 18.5 l
< 18.2
< 22.7
< 32.8
< 23.2
< 21.7 i
i i
l l Zn-65/2E4
< 29.6
< 29.3
< 30.3
< 46.8
< 41.3
< 38.9 l
i e
l Cs-134/1E3
< 10.4
< 9.79
< 11.9
< 14.7
< 14.5
< 11.7 l
l l
1 l
Cs-137/2E3
< 10.6
< 9.90
< 12.0 i
< 18.7
< 12.6
!~
< 14.0 i
l e
l l
l l
l l
i.
t I
f f
f I
t I
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL REM :
. _, ~. _.,,,.
7 t
e TABLE 15 FTSH SAMPLE ACTIVITY IN THE VICINITY OF LACliWR (Report Concentrations in pCi/Kg)
- SAMFLE #1 l SAMPLE #2
- SAMPLE #
! SAMPLE #
! SAMILE #
j SAMPLE #
- COLLECTION DATE: l 10/10/89 l
11/10/89 l
j l
l l
' FISH SPECIES:
l CARP l
WALLEYE j
j j.
l l
l ISOTOPES /RL*
- Mn-54/3E4
< 14.2 1
< 14.0 1
l Fe-59/IE4
< 37.2
< 34.0 Co-58/3E4
< 15.0
< 13.1
- Co-60/1E4
< 28.9
< 29.8
- Zn-65/2E4 i
< 59.3
< 39.5 l Cs-134/IE3
< 32.7
< 19.8 Cs-137/2E3
< 19.4
< 18.4
- RL - REPORTING LEVEL REM.. -
- i-
- 1 1!
- i, o.
- l l.,..'
..;.,;.. ;.. ;.. l..,,....,.....,...,....,,.,,....
ELPM AS ll;.,
...1 BCAL FO E
)
L g
P mK M
/
A u
i S
t i
C C
p I
!l..
V n i
EH s
T n
6 o
1 N i E
I t
L E
a P
0 L
Y r
M 7
B T
t A
A l
n S
T v ec u, n lll..
o A C t
E t
2 L
r P
o M p E
A e
L S R P
(
M N
A O
S ITA ill..
..1 TEG E
1 R
Y V
- 9E T
8D I
E D
E/E V
V A
N L8O 2
T O
D U
C M
O P0R M/H 7 A F
A9C A
S0S L
E V
- l..
E L
E G
T N
A I
D L
T R
R N
/
O O
S P
I E
E T
P R
C O
E T
L O
L S
L O
I R
C M
ER
..l.l..'
..l..l..
ll l
,lllI lIll!tli,
- !!ltlilil,i.'
llit 1
l;:
J, I