ML20011E458
| ML20011E458 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 10/24/1989 |
| From: | Burris S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20011D121 | List:
|
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9002140094 | |
| Download: ML20011E458 (2) | |
Text
,
e 01 I
+
s.
d s
ti.
October 24, 1989 MEMORANDUM FOP:
Dennis M. Crutchfield, Associate Director for Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reacter Regulation FROM:
Stephen P. Burris, Senior Resident I n s p e c t o,r, WBNP, ADSP Office of Nuclear Reacter Regulation
SUBJECT:
RESPONSE TO NRC STAFF DIFFERING PROFESSIONAL OPINION ON COMANCHE PEAK V
L In accordance with your request L
concerning the recently of October 10, 1989 completed Licensee Performance process Systematic Assessment of letter-for your review.
and bearc, I am submitting this After.
reviewing this proposed SALP report and having been present during the recent meeting of agree with my original the SALP Bened, I still assessment of findings, THE SALP REPORT the SALP Board LICENSEE *S PAST PERFORMANCE.IS AN ACCURATE REPORT OF T with any speculative er No individual has provided me concrete evidence contrary findings'of the proposed l
SALP report.
to the 3
Based on having been involved with numerous other SALP processes, I firmly believe that facilities board meeting was both accurate and a the SALP process and defined within~the scope of NRC Manual assessment as fair l
was conducted chapter.
the guidance.of Appendix B ofChapter NRC-OS16, within and this
.q s
I would like to state s
3 for Comanche Peak was that I-believe the SALP Board process correctly conducted. The novice SALP
[
participant should realize that integration of numerous and sometimes diverthe SALP process is an opinions, information is carefully se views and by each member but as a group,cf the SALP Board, considered and voted on to ensure that onenot a single individual not-have a negative effect on our missionindividuals opinion does and Safety."
"Public Health In closing, I have every the recent SALP Boardconfidence in the accuracy outcome of and used to accomplish this goal.
the methodology results and po o 2 N um y pp M
@ ROM'
z'.
'Y--
s
. Should.you have any Questions'or comments concerning any of my' statements, please feel free-to-call me at 615-365-5488.
Stephen'P. Burris, Benior Resident.
Inspector, WBNP, ADSP '"'
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ces C. Grimes R.
Warnick J. Wiebe H.
Livermore
_