ML20011E460

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Chart in Response to Item 1 of 891116 Memo Re Differing Prof Opinion on Plant
ML20011E460
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 12/06/1989
From: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Miraglia F
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20011D121 List:
References
NUDOCS 9002140099
Download: ML20011E460 (3)


Text

1 e,.

t khAG.

t

~

t

. [5 UNITED STATES

!'T f.f)g i NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION

.i.

Jc WASHINGTON, D, C. 20555

.+

/[; c December 6, 1989' 2

. MEMORANDUM FOR:

Frank J. Miraglia, Chairman DPO Review Panel on Comanche Peak FROM:.

Dennis M. Crutchfield, Associate Director for Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i

SUBJECT:

DIFFERINGiPROFESSIONAL OPINION ON COMANCHE PEAK The enclosed chart is in response.to item #1 of your

' I memo dated November 16, 1989 regarding differing professional-opinion on Comanche Peak.

This chart was prepared by Eileen

Peyton of my staff.

Also enclosed are copies of memos to file.

documenting telephone contact referenced in my November 3, 1989 memo.

w.

/

y enn M

Crutc 1 eld, ssociate. Director for Special Project-Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

1.

Chart 2.

Memos

- I cc w/ enclosures:

J. Sniezek J.

Partlow H. Smith

\\g Of 607 l *lo0*l 1 Ne

x

-.,N, t

r

.It FOLLOWUF ON COMANCHE PEAK DP0 1

I Date'

.c Individual Contacteo Report Received

- Conenents

- C. Willians 11/22/89 Yes No comments.

[

J.lWiebe 11/22/69

'Yes No comments.

j

- G. Hubbard 11/22/89 Yes No comments.

it.Wescott 11/22/89 Yes No coments.

R.~i.atta 11/22/89 Yes Thought SALP process-we.s 9000; changes that were made

-were concurred in by staff.

. J. Rajan 11/22/89 Yes Reviewed AIT portion which-t he was involved in - no-coments.

A. Singh

'11/22/89 Yes No coments.

]

R. Azua 11/22/89 Yes No comments.

T.- 11cKernon 11/22/89 Yes No coments.

L R. Vickery 11/22/89 Yes No comments.

1 f'

J. Whittemore 11/22/89 Yes No comments.

L. Ricketson 11/22/89 Yes No coments.

D. Powers-11/22/89 Yes No comments.

J. Birmingham 11/22/89 Yes

  • No coments. Provided coments to Chris Grimes in response'to his 10/3 and 10/11 memo.

J. Taylor 11/22/89 Yes

  • No comments.

Provided coments 'to Chris Grimes in response to his 10/3 and 10/11 memo. No specific e

hardware or plant concerns.

Internal politics; no relation to plant.

h ',

.c v

?./

~2-4 Date

.,s' Individual Contacted Report Received Coments 1

W. Richins 11/28/89

'Yes

-*No other comments besides-the ones contained in' response to 10/3 and 10/11-r1 memo from Chris Grimes.

D; Graves 11/28/89 Yes No comments.

K. Kennedy 11/28/89 Ye' s No coments.

J. Nicholas 11/28/89 Yes-No comments, j

i D. Murray 11/28/89' Yes No comments.

1 J. Nicholas 11/28/89 Yes No comments, j

i F. Victor 11/28/89-Yes No comments.

j 1
d. Pellet 11/28/89 Yes No coments.

l 1

W. Johnson 11/29/89 Yes No coments.

l l

G. Bryan -

11/29/89 Yes No comments.

l 1

G. Stoetzel 11/29/89 Yes No comments.

j L

M. Stein 12/4/89 Yes No comments.

.{

L G. Wilford 12/6/89 Yes No comments.

j i

The following inaividuals owe return phone calls:

J. Cummins - returns to office on 12/11 P. Chen-

- returns to office on 12/:1.

J. Kelley - is on sick leave; comes in office when health permits; left message for him to call j

C. Paulk P. Stanish - contract expired end of October; may be back in for two weeks in December

  • These individuals' memos are attached to this chart.

l l

!