ML20011E440

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises of No Substantial Difference Between Original SALP Input & SALP Rept on Texas Utils Performance.Salp Rept Honestly & Accurately Describes Subj Matter Submitted by Author for Plant SALP
ML20011E440
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  
Issue date: 10/17/1989
From: Terc N
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20011D121 List:
References
NUDOCS 9002140046
Download: ML20011E440 (1)


Text

,

1 j,8 "'%

UNITED STATES

]

3x

'a NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV j

/

$11 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE SUITE 1000

%,,g, ARLINGTON.TEKAS 70011 October 17, 1989 i

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Dennis M. Crutchfield, Associate Director for Special Projects Office Of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:

Nemen N. Terc, Emergency Preparedness Specialist Security and Emergency Preparedness Section Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards

SUBJECT:

DIFFERING PROFESSIONAL OPINION ON COMANCHE PEAK I read my original SALP input and the SALP report on Texas Utilities i

performance and did not find any substantial difference between the two.

I believe that the SALP report honestly and accurately describes the subject matter submitted by myself for the Comanche Peak SALP.

Av :

Nemen N. Terc, Emergency Preparednes pecialist Security and Emergency Preparedness ection Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards i

cc:

T. Murley, NRR/00NRR J. Sniezek, NRR/DONRR J. Partlow, NRR/ADP F. Miraglia, NRR/ADT C. Grimes, NRR/CP

,-~

l'