ML20011E449
| ML20011E449 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak |
| Issue date: | 10/25/1989 |
| From: | Everett R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20011D121 | List:
|
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9002140063 | |
| Download: ML20011E449 (1) | |
Text
- ***%,%
' UllTED STATES NUCLEAR [EGULATORY COMMISSION
$y f
f RE010N IV 5
811 %Y4 4 PLAZA DRIVE. SulTE Itub
, e'
- A NOTON.TEXAB 70011
'A t 5 m MEMORANDUM FOR:
Dennis M. Crutchfield, Associate Director For Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
R. J. Everett, Chief Nuclear Material Licensing Section Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards
SUBJECT:
' COMMENTS ON COMANCHE PEAK DRAFT SALP REPORT I was responsible for the NRC's inspection programs in Security and Emergency Preparedness during most of the subject SALP period.
With regard to emergency planning, I believe that the SALP report accurately describes the performance of the Comanche Peak staff and conclusions of the NRC inspection staff as documented in their SALP input. With regard to Security, some changes could be made to more accurately describe thr. conclusions of the inspection staff.
The-applicant's audit program consisted of an audit group within the Security group.
The report probably gives toe applicant too much credit in this regard.
On the other hand, we knock them fer ' heir lack of readiness for final phase lock down. Many of the problems arter:ieted with this lack of readiness were beyond the control of the security praur, i.e.. c0nstruction activity and large numbers of personnel onsite.
The exten;ier, of the SALP period allowed more of the readiness issue to come out.
Based upon the experiences of the Security staff in performing preoperational inspections at other plants, Comanche Peak should be a SALP 1 in Security.
R. J
, Chief Nuclear Material Licensing Section 4
QyQkI