Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARIR 05000266/19810011981-02-13013 February 1981
IE Insp Repts 50-266/81-01 & 50-301/81-01 on 810102-30.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Followup on Items of Noncompliance,Operational Safety Verification & Monthly Maint Observation
Project stage: Request
ML20008E7351981-03-0202 March 1981
Responds to NRC 801021 & 810122 Requests for Addl Info Re Fire Protection Safety Evaluation Suppl.App R Mod Requirements Are Narrow in Scope & Do Not Assure That Increased Plant Safety Will Be Achieved
Project stage: Other
ML19247E3141981-03-18018 March 1981
Provides Info Re Fire Protection Mods at Facilities.Items Addressed:Water Damage Protection,Fire Barriers,Ventilation Sys Control Cables,Diesel Generator Air Intake Structure & Containment Bldg Fire Stops
Project stage: Other
ML19347D5751981-03-18018 March 1981
Requests Extension of Schedule Dates in New Fire Protection Regulations.Requests Exemption from Requirement Forbidding Shift Supervisor to Belong to Fire Brigade.Provides Basis for Both Requests
Project stage: Other
ML19347D5721981-03-18018 March 1981
Forwards Fire Protection Exemption Request
Project stage: Other
ML20003E7381981-04-0404 April 1981
Revises Reading of Second Paragraph on Page 7 of . Revised Statement Is Compatible W/Present Facility Fire Protection Organization Excluding Maint Group Personnel as Fire Brigade Members
Project stage: Other
ML20003G9571981-04-23023 April 1981
Informs That Fee for Fire Protection Mods Not Justified Per 10CFR170.22
Project stage: Other
ML20004D4481981-06-0505 June 1981
Responds to NRC Re Fee for Approval of Licensee 810423 Request for Time Extension for Fire Protection Mods. Payment of Fee Should Not Be Required Since Request Was Not in Form of Amend to OL
Project stage: Request
ML20005A6041981-06-23023 June 1981
Advises That Applicant Disagrees W/Denial of Request for Exemption to 10CFR50 App R, Section Iii.H.Duty Operating Supervisor Designated as Fire Brigade Leader.Util Will Revise Circulating Water Pumphouse Mod for Item 3.2.2
Project stage: Request
ML20030A9371981-07-24024 July 1981
Notifies That Util Will Periodically Test Inservice Hydostatic Fire Hoses Per NFPA 1962 & Requirements of 10CFR50 App E Section Iii.E
Project stage: Other
ML17275B3781981-08-11011 August 1981
Responds to 810724 Request for Clarification of Requirements Re Fire Hose Hydrostatic Testing.Util Commitment to Purchase New Fire Hose Is in Accordance W/Requirements of NEPA 1961 Code
Project stage: Approval
ML20031D3361981-10-0202 October 1981
Provides Status of Fire Protection Mods for Facility. Detectors Will Be Installed in Unit 1 Containment During Refueling Outage Which Begins 811009 & in Unit 2 During Spring 1982 Outage
Project stage: Other
ML20040E6821982-01-29029 January 1982
Requests Mod to 810318 Submittal Requesting Extension of Schedule Date Re Fire Protection to Revise Commitment Dates to 820630 & 820131,respectively
Project stage: Other
ML20041D8461982-02-18018 February 1982
Ack Receipt of Modifying 10CFR,App R Fire Protection Exemption Request.Evaluation of Request Will Be Forthcoming
Project stage: Other
ML20052F8051982-05-0404 May 1982
Advises That Commission Has Granted Exemption from Fire Protection Rule Schedular Requirements of 10CFR50.48(c). Revision of Generic Ltr 81-12 Encl
Project stage: Approval
ML20052F8091982-05-0404 May 1982
Exemption from Fire Protection Rule Schedular Requirements of 10CFR50.48(c)
Project stage: Approval
1981-06-23
[Table View] |
Text
.
WISCONSIN Electnc m coum<
231 W. MICHICAN P.O. 801 2046. MILWAUKEE. wi 53201 April 4, 1981
.='
t'-
9
'N Mr. Harold R.
Denton, Director
/
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
, f" ' Y Q
)
E U. S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D. C.
20555 APR O B B1c85
Dear Mr. Denton:
FIRE PROTECTION EXEMPTION REQUEST r,f DOCKETS 50-266 AND 50-301
./
g, (,(c;'_.,-ljX POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 In the second full paragraph on Page 7 of our letter to you dated March 18, we stated, "In addition, selected maintenance and security personnel are trained and qualified for fire brigade duty."
The reference to maintenance personnel should be deleted so that the sentence reads:
"In addition, selected security personnel are trained and qualified for fire brigade duty."
This revised statement is compatible,with the present Point Beach Nuclear Plant fire protection organization, which has been changed to exclude Maintenance Group personnel as fire brigade members.
This change does not affect our previous commitment in respect to the number of people on shift qualified to serve on the fire brigade.
The revised statement, therefore, does not affect the basis for our exemption request.
Very truly yours, m
i y
i Executive Vice President L
Sol Burstein h
Copy to Resident Inspector
/ 6 810.4100 36f
[
.
