ML19345G736

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Responds to Util Forwarding Results of Nonradiological Environ Monitoring & Conclusion That Continued Monitoring in Four Areas Was No Longer Necessary. No Further Monitoring Required Re Bird Collisions
ML19345G736
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 04/14/1981
From: Stolz J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Crouse R
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
References
TAC-42152, NUDOCS 8104220195
Download: ML19345G736 (2)


Text

.

geS "%j,%

7 UNITED STATES E'

~j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION wasuiNoTom.o. c.2 ossa

.. j

\\....,/

April 14,1981 Docket No. 50-346 Mr. Richard P. Crouse Vice President, Nuclear Toledo Edison Company Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43652

Dear Mr. Crouse:

Your letter of August 22, 1950, forwarded results concerning certain nonradiological environmental monitoring around the Davis-Besse site.

Based upon these results, you concluded that continued monitoring of the Davis-Besse environs in four identified areas was no longer necessar/. These areas are covered under your Technical Specifications, A;apendix B, Sections 3.1.1.a.1, 3.1.2.a.1, 3.1.2.a.2, and 3.1.2.b.1.

You stated that the associated monitoring programs are being terminated as of Decenter 31, 1980, based upon your evaluations of the environ-mental imoact of the Davis-Besse plant. You consider that your reports and notification of termination were consistent with Section 3.1 of Appendix B to your Technical Specifications.

With respect to Specification 3.1.2.b.1, " Bird Collisions", we concur' in your report's conclusion that there has been no significant adverse effect on bird populations due to the cooling tower and other site structures. We will require no further monitoring in this regard.

With respect to the other specific programs covered in your reports, we are continuing our review and will advise you of our final conclusions in subsequent correspondence. Until we reach our final cunclusions, we concur with your discontinuation of further monitoring in these areas.

If our review indicates the need for continuing, but less intensive, pm-gram in accordance with Specification 3.1 of your Appendix 3 Technical Specifications, we will inform you at that time.

i ncerely,G

, Ux J.

John' k. Stolz, Chie l

ating Reactors Branch f4 Division of Licensing cc:

See next page

/

()Y b

i 5

Toledo Edison Company cc w/ enclosure (s):

Mr. Donald H. Hauser, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission The Cleveland Electric Resident Inspector's Office

~

Illuminating Company 5503 N. State Route 2 i

P. O. Box 5000 Oak Harbor, Ohio 43449 t

Cleveland, Ohio 44101 Director, Criteria and Standards i

Gerald Charnoff, Esq.

Division Shaw, Pittman, Potts Office of Radiation Programs (ANR-460) and Trowbridge U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 1800 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D. C.

20460 Washington, D. C.

20036 Leslie Henry, Esq.

Fuller, Seney, Henry and Hodge U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 300 Madison Avenue Federal Activities Branch Toledo, Ohio 43604 Region V Office ATTN: EIS CCORDINATCR Mr. Robert 3. Borsum 230 South Dearborn Street Babcock & Wilcox Chicago, Illinois 60604 Nuclear Power Generation Division Suite 420, 7735 Old Georgetown Road Sethesda, Maryland 20014 Ida Rupp Public Library Ohio Department of Health 310 Madison Street ATTN: Radiological Health Port Clinton, Ohio 43452 Program Director P. O. Box 118 President > Scard of County Columbus, Ohio 43216 Commissioners of Ottawa County Port Clinton, Ohio 43452 Attorney General Department of Attorney General 30 East Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 Harold Kahn, Staff Scientist Power Siting Commission 361 East Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43216 Mr. Rick Jagger Industrial Commission State of Ohio 2323 West 5th Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43216 Mr. Ted Myers Manager, Nuclear Licensing Toledo Edison Company Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43652

. - -