05000289/LER-1980-019-03, /03L-0:on 801126,A & B Battery Room Smoke Detector Monthly Surveillance Test Not Performed.Caused by Inadequate Implementation of Administrative Controls.Surveillance Modified

/03L-0:on 801126,A & B Battery Room Smoke Detector Monthly Surveillance Test Not Performed.Caused by Inadequate Implementation of Administrative Controls.Surveillance Modified

ML19340D733
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	12/24/1980
From:	Mitchell D METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19340D730	List: 05000289/LER-1980-019, Forwards LER 80-019/03L-0 05000289/LER-1980-019-03, /03L-0:on 801126,A & B Battery Room Smoke Detector Monthly Surveillance Test Not Performed.Caused by Inadequate Implementation of Administrative Controls.Surveillance Modified
References
LER-80-019-03L, LER-80-19-3L, TLL-692, NUDOCS 8101050246
Download: ML19340D733 (2)

LER-1980-019, /03L-0:on 801126,A & B Battery Room Smoke Detector Monthly Surveillance Test Not Performed.Caused by Inadequate Implementation of Administrative Controls.Surveillance Modified

Event date:
Report date:
2891980019R03 - NRC Website

text

.

• t t a c hrf-n t 1

• Li 69'l U.5 NUCLE A2 RtGUL Afony coenaatssios ta AC 8 02 W D6 17 77)

L10ENSEE EVENT REPORT

?

,*LE Ast *aist c A tvet ALL ateviato i%'cauAtiON

sta o. s Lcer.

. t

.v is 1 h Q j;

i ! ! iA'II": If 1.f?q0 !C'

<0'Oto}g'o!.'n a p ;1 a ".+

.at%>:

.et 4:

..:assa s.v4 6 e,

ven%5s :::t "t*C"'

'. k i0 5 ' G i O t 012 ! E io PI

+!.ir

! r. k7d ' i

! 7' e'

r F' cos t 4

io,

- v.

aan:

a's sov :t sv.

e E*

att a

e A

6-

xaE s.ver EVENT DESCAi'?t0N ANO *a;a At.E CONSEC.T.CES h I

jc, ! ihe A and E Eatter" Poor sen e detecto-c c'

c. c ;.,

2 T.S.

_ 6 C 'i e-m '

veillance test was not perferned.

The surveillan:e procedure states the i

I.;ii detectors will not be tested during battery char:es.

The Unit is in colr' shut-I down and the batteries were on equali::e charge thus.

preventine detector testi., l This event is reportable per T.S. 6.9.2.E(3).

t t

{0t '] I I

( c is i i S3 7

8 9 COM8 bAivE SYSTIV "A.Sf CaySI CC t 2005 5L00008 CDwe0NENT00DE 5v00C04 SVSCOCE l: 19l l

l l h lDlg l2[g lXlxjxl x[x lx lg l7 lg g

io a

i.

i, n

Sf 0cENTIA.

000LaAENCE mE* ORT 81 VISION g

5%ENT*taa mEPORT NC.

CODE TYPL NC.

b.'(j.e[na l8 i Ol l_l l011 ! 9 l jpl [nbl W

(-j l ol

_v n

u 2

2.

v

s n

u u

a T-A ww g e.T Nemo emius ;0up C0upoNEN.

ACTION suTymt Epstc?

$wt?cewN TAREN ACTCN ONPt4NT WITm00

.e0 Val Sw 0 wiTT E 0 80*w but SLP* u t a M ANWF ACTsata 12 Qlc l@

12 l@

l vlg l0 l0 l 0 l

l Yjg lN lg

[ Jg l7 jo lc jo l@

m 2

2, 2.

u CAUSE DESO Al*TICN AND CC A AE0TIVE ACTIONS The event was due to inadequate plementation of administrative controls which l

g The surveillance will be modified 1

, allowed exceeding the surveillance interval.

l

,to allow testing while the batteries are charging.

I t

• i si l l

I5 14 1I so P

8 9 DISCOVERY CES:P8'Tf 0N ST S

%PQWEm 070 Em $TATL$

DI$ CV av I

NRC Order l

lBl@l Surveillance testine l

d @ 10l0l0l@l I'i5' SO 44 44 e6 7

8 9 10 12 11 A cts yt TV CONTENT LOCAf t0N OF aELI A$f mELEASE 08 mELgaSI AWOUNT 08 ACTIVITv

}

l1 l6 l l Z l NA l

l

• ?A EQ 44 43 r

g g ic to PER$3NNEL E DOSURES I

Nuve g m Tv'E CES mi'TiCN l

li l 71 l 0 l 010 l@l Zl@l NA 40 t'

2 13

'ERSONNE L INav' ales I

t 9 C 'll F IA\\

1

^'

D "l1 'D i

DJ fli 1

No

.E.

o t s:.... '

'H

.J NA Ii i 1101010l@l a

o wau su mwaut wu.:2 u

Loss os on cauaGE to #Acauf v TVPE CESCaseticN I nlIzl@l NA 1

l i

- 2

.c

• • ls':...v,0N @

@]0105 0 ate N".

t struirtsistil i o

I: n ige (Si

.ss t

65 69 gr, ;

8' J

'O D. G. Mitchell (717) 948-8553

(

N AN*E 08 P AE8 AR E A PMONE I

L

TLL 692 License Evert Report

Narrative

Eepert LER S0-19 Event Date - Novenber 26, 1980 I.

Event Description and Probable Consequences On the 26th cf November 1980, the "A" and "B" Battery hoot Smoke detecto;s (r5-67S ane IS-679) conthly surveillance test was not pe r f o rmed.

This condition is reportable under T.S. 6.9.2.B(3) in that the implementation of administrative controls was not adequate to prevent exceeding ti,e required surveillance interval.

The Unit was in cold shutdown a-d the batteries were on equalize charce.

11.

Cause Description and Corrective Action The surveillance procedures prohibited testing those two instruments due to plant conditiv.is. The cause for exceeding the late date for the surveillance test was inadequate followup on the deficiency.

A change to the surveillance procedure has been submitted to remove the statement that the detectors v113 not be tested during battery charges.

The detectors were testec on the 22nd of December and no problems were found.

The administrative procedure will be reviewed to assure that the responsibilities for followup of Exceptions and Deficiencies are clearly defined.

The responsible departments will be directed to ensure that their personnel are aware of their responsibility to followup on Exceptions and Deficiencies.