ML19332D428
| ML19332D428 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/19/1985 |
| From: | Miller V NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19332B436 | List: |
| References | |
| FRN-54FR49763, RULE-PR-170 AD23-1-06, AD23-1-6, NUDOCS 8912010187 | |
| Download: ML19332D428 (3) | |
Text
_ _. _ c.
el t
O O
l
- 5 g
UNITED STAtt$
NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMisslON i
n AsHiNGTON. O c fous p
f.. ~ y p MEMORANDUM FOR: William O. Miller, Chief License fee Management Branch l
Office of Administration j
FROM:
Vandy L. Miller, Chief j
Material Licensing Branch Division of fuel Cycle and Material Safety i
SUBJECT:
FEE CATEGORIES FOR SERVICE LICENSES d
As requested in your memorendum dated February 7,1985, we have reviewed the fee categories for service licenses. Our coments are as follows:
1.
It is not appropriate.to charge "other service" licensees the same low fee as " leak test" licensees. Leak testing involves no possession of radio-active material other than leak test samples themselves.
Other service licenses involve quantities of radioactive material up to several hundred curies or even more.
The review required for other services is inherently more complex.
2.
ThJ current 3N fees appear to be reasonable averages for all service license applications combined.
3.
We now have five different program codes for service licenses (03221 -
03225).
As long as we charge fees bued on averages, there will be discrepancies in cettain cases.
It,s true-that some calibration licenses are less complex than a shielded irradiator license, which involves a lower fee.
4.
The Stan A. Huber license does not involve lar material, but it is a fairly comphx license. ge quantities of hazardous Our recollection is that we have spent much more time on licensing actions for this license than the avarage.
For your information, we have attached FY-84 data on completed license cases.
Because the cases were handled by all five regions and headquarters, the staff hours expen*;d on these cases cannot be retrieved from the computer.
For this i
reason and for reasons of consistency, we do not recommend that the fees for l
service licensees only be changed unless this is part of a comprehensive review l
and revision of Part 170. However, if LFMB believes that there is a pressing E
need to adjust the fees for servi.:e licenses, we suggest the following amendments:
8 Og18789)129 1 7 0 Pii D C PDR
-=
O O
I Mr. killiam O. Miller "
I 1.
Other services with sealed sources only, less than 1 curie total - $290 (same as civil def'nse),
e 2.
Self-shielded calibrators, no open Nam - $230 (same as irradiators) 3.
Other calibrators - $700 (same as rdD and well logging) 4.
If licensee pays 3N, do not charge extra for 3P (leak test).
5.
(lio change to fees G r other 3N.)
an L Mi $r le Material Licensing Branch Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety
Enclosure:
As stated I
h t
I l
mec n.
s o~
,4 e
I D
g l
f W
\\
Q
~
't I
-n
i O
o I
i
.q
=.
ENCLOSURE FY-84 LICENSING DATA i
PROGRAM CODE TYPE OF ACTION NO. OF CASES NEW 3
l 03220-AMEf;DMENT 3
RENEWAL 1
03221 NEW 0
5 AMENDMENT 20 RENEWAL 10 03222 NEW 0
AMENDMENT 19
.i RENEWAL 9
i 03223 NEW 6
~
AMENDMENT 23
. RENEWAL 5
i 03224 NEW 0
l AMENDMENT 1
RENEWAL 0
?
t 03225 NEW 5
t AMENDMENT 20-l RENEWAL 6
i i
i l
l l.
I-I-
F f
__