ML19332D353

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Inconsistencies Noted in Staff Hour Data Provided on 890306 Re Understanding of Matls Licensing Process & Current Fee Schedule
ML19332D353
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/27/1989
From: Hiller H
NRC OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER
To: Funches J
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML19332B436 List:
References
FRN-54FR49763, RULE-PR-170 AD23-1-23, NUDOCS 8912010061
Download: ML19332D353 (2)


Text

_. ~. ~.. -. -.. -. - -. -

., -..- -.~

.+

O O

m

~

k UNITED STATES a,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COlilMISSION -

E wAsmworow, p.c.2oses J

%..... /

MAR 2 71989 i

?

?

MEMORANDUM FOR:-

Jesse L. Funches, Director Program Management, Policy Development l

and Analysis Staff Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards I

.i FROM:

H. Lee Hiller, Deputy Controller Office of the Controller

SUBJECT:

MATERIALS LICENSING HOURS We have reviewed the staff-hour data you provided on March 6, 1989,in support of our' proposal to revise the materials license fees. As a result of our.

analysis of the data, we have identified several areas that appear to be.

inconsistent with our understand 1hg of the materials licensing process and

.with the current fee schedule. The' items in question are as follows:

1.

More hours are reported-for renewals than for new applications for-fee categories 38 3E, 3M, 3P, 6A, and 7C. We note that the hours:

reported for 6A renewals are more than double the hours for new-applications.

~

2.

More hours are reported for amendments than for renewals for fee.

-[,

_ categories ID and 2B.

-3.

The hours reported appear to be inconsistent for fee category IC.as compared to-1D and 3P, 3A as compared to 3B (amendments and renewals), 3E as compared to 3F (renewals), 3H as compared to.3I i

(all), 3J as compared to 3K (renewals).(3L as compared to 3M-(amendments), and 7A as compared to 7B newapplications).

i-4.

The data. reflects a significant~ decrease in the staff hours for fee' L

categories 10.(renewals), 3C (renewals), 3D (new' app 11 cations and:"

renewels),!3F (renewals), 3J (renewals), 3M (new applications) 3N.

l-(newapplicationsandrenewals),48(amendments),4C(amendments),

i and7C(new< applications). We. note. that for some of these.

categories the hours for other action types increased.

5.

The' data reflects a significant-increase in the staff hours for fee-categories-1C (new applications and renewals), 2C (amendments and L

- renewels), 3B (amendments and renewals), 3G (renewals), 3H (new '

applications and renewals), 31 (all types), 3K (all types), 3M' o

l (amendments) 3N(amendments),30(newapplications),3P(amendments L

and renewals},)5A (new applications and amendments), 6A (r and amendments, 7A (new applications), 7C (amendments), and 8A (amendeonts). For some of these categories, the hours for other i

action' types - decreased.

8912010061 891129 PDR PR 170 MISC PDR

r...

,~

o o.

i L

L MAR 2 71989 -

0 J

~2-6.

The hours reported for-fee categories 4B and 4C amendments seen'to be inconsistent with-the-hours:for new applications and renewals and-with other fee categories.

Since we must be able-to substantiate the basis for the revised. fees,-welare.

requesting your assistance in resolving the concerns listed above.

In addition to any other information you;are'able to provide, please> identify any p licensing: policies,=changesein regulations, or other circumstances;which had; an impact on the-staff: hours in question.

For-example. are the hours reported:

for renewals greater than=the hours for new applications (Iter 1 above) due to the need to review historical-inspection findings as the time of renewsI?c Have changes in the licensing process occurred which sffected'the: correlation between the categories identified in Item-3 above? Did the implementation >of new or revised regulations result in the increase or decrease in staff hours identified in Items-4 and 5 above?

In order to' meet our schedule for preparing the Commission paper, please respond by April 11,'1989.

H. Lee Hiller, Deputy Controller"

- Office of the controller-L 6

h

?

e e

e

+

ye.---,e'r-me

---46-rw e

mm-aw--w-+-+t-sm-e---9+-

e

-e-wer

  • -ra-e-a m

m e

--*--wee

-e--n,-e*-

m ew---,

=r ers ar-w e

er,e e me

-