05000289/LER-1980-015-04, /04T-0:on 800721,while Units Were in Cold Shutdown Condition,Actual River Water Temp Exceeded Tech Spec Limits for 6-h.Caused by Inaccurate Compensation for Resistance Temp Detector Lead Resistance During Calibr

/04T-0:on 800721,while Units Were in Cold Shutdown Condition,Actual River Water Temp Exceeded Tech Spec Limits for 6-h.Caused by Inaccurate Compensation for Resistance Temp Detector Lead Resistance During Calibr

ML19331C777
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	08/14/1980
From:	Mitchell D METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19331C772	List: 05000289/LER-1980-015, Forwards LER 80-015/04T-0 05000289/LER-1980-015-04, /04T-0:on 800721,while Units Were in Cold Shutdown Condition,Actual River Water Temp Exceeded Tech Spec Limits for 6-h.Caused by Inaccurate Compensation for Resistance Temp Detector Lead Resistance During Calibr
References
LER-80-015-04T, LER-80-15-4T, TLL-375, NUDOCS 8008190518
Download: ML19331C777 (2)

LER-1980-015, /04T-0:on 800721,while Units Were in Cold Shutdown Condition,Actual River Water Temp Exceeded Tech Spec Limits for 6-h.Caused by Inaccurate Compensation for Resistance Temp Detector Lead Resistance During Calibr

Event date:
Report date:
2891980015R04 - NRC Website

text

o TLL 376 U. S. NUCLEAA aEGULA70av cCMMtsSION stAC PCau 3s4 (7 779 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT e@

teLEAsa emiNT on tves ALL aEcuinto impeavAriosi l

C:NTact stCCic. l. I I

i 1

I i

lo !i j (P I Al Tl Mi Il 1l@l010 l 10101010101 10 t o l@l 4111 111 11 !@lir;Ar,e@

I

(

i.

s u:assa w usta a

a vc4Nss rves,a s e vcasses cece 21 11 sl n @ l M I I I I

l@

s u,"c** ' l L Ql 01 51 01 01 01218 I 9 Ql 01 TI so si soca:T w ueen 4e ave %t2 Ara r.

s ascar: Ara sa l

I i

s EVENT CESCRieflCN AND PAC 8 ABLE CONSECUENCES h I) i al i This event occurred while both units were in a cnid shn* d~

- - ~~ d 4 -

..e i

3j ; minimal need for River Water cooline. For acoreximatelv 6 hourm

• ba 1-*"n1 n d ~n-I maximum of -5 F.

This is a violation!

[aia1l Water f.T exceeded the -3 F limit. reachitc n of Section 2.1.a(1) and is reportable per 6.9.2.A.2.

It was determined that therel

,,,,, j g I

! were no detrimental effects to the environment.

3,., j l

~

[ 3 I 'l I i 'i4i i C098 vatvt Svitt u CA 58 CALSE COCE

03 stec0ct

MPCNENT 038 SLac00E SLac208 I W l E l@ LX_j@ I Z l@ II IN i s l T i n ! v l@ d, j@ U @

lai>!

1 o

i, ia o

i w

• EviliCN

$1064 %tI AL CCOLAmtscg agecm7 ivt%fvtA4 et*C Ar NO.

COCE rY't NC.

@ ;gga aQ 18 10 l l_]

10 11 l SI 1A 1nIcl lTI L, -J l01

','g;

_2, a

n 2

21 n

a u

2 UANL,eese%r cu Ar Ac va*r wao4

• aive c:ve ACTLata Actio* suttaa esss:t s-o rseww rAAIN ACT'ON CN*LANT Ve?-oc wCLAS

$6aviTT13 FCau wS.

SL P'Li 4 4 lE!@lXI@

lZl@

lZl@

10 10 10 10 l W@

W@

l Al@

l F l 1 ! 8 I O!@

u a

a a

v

.o

.i n

2 o

CAust cEsCalPTICN ANQ COmaECTIVE ACTICNS @

l This event was caused by inaccurate compensation for the R'"D lead resistance durini

,,.3,

i,,,j; calibration. This instrument was recalibrated and cost shov procer indication j

,,,,was attained. Further investigations will be performed and the results will be l

I

,,,,jl issued in a revised report.

I'i.iI 3#$ coy (4V O(j0M,#rfGN tra $

%*Qwte Ofw(R $?ATL$

3

,C y

I IA!@l-,or,-,y eu<.,..,,-,

i-i. j 121@ ! OI O10 !@l :me orser

'3 a

.:CAric, e,.tuest @

'.e'r,,, r.

Wrtst

.vou~r :, Act,viry @ I l

o m u j @a -... u.s.L:J@i

..u.si i

u m

43

.4 5

i 4

)

tQ tt l

Pte$cg%gtque:148E5 1

%uvete

' vet g s:3 pCN I

i i :I I 01010 l@l Z ;@l Na 40

• ges0%%g. N,u'a, ( 5

=.,:.....:N @

i m,..

o m I ni mi s@i

,1

~

LC$50834 aua;g* sicipev

'**t

(5;aisei. %

l I ' ! 3 l t E!

NA

• Let Ct?v b. Ob Idol I

$$(g j gg! 4ip.6CN l

NA l

l l l l fl ! l i 8 l f*

~

4.

a

)

o r7171 94s-sssi R00819ng g su.

n. c. :titchell

,,cy,

,,os.,,,,

TLL 376 LICE.3EE EVENT REPORT

NARRATIVE

REPORT IMI-1 LER 80-015/04T-0 EVENT DATE - JULY 21, 1980 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND CONSE0CENCES This event occurred while both units were in a cold shutdown condition with a minimal need for River Water cooling. Meteorological conditions were such that the ambient river water temperature exceeded 870F which requires additional cooling of discharge River Water (RW) by the Mechanical Uraft Cooling Towers (MDCT). The RWAT was being maintained at about -20F.

A discrepancy between IMI-l and TMI-2 indicated RWAT revealed that the TMI-l recorder was indicating 20F higher than the actual RNAT. During approyi=ately a.6 hour6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> period the 0

RWaT exceeded the -30F limit, reaching a maximum of -5 F, thus the water discharged to the river was actually 320F. This incident did not have any detricental effect on the environment.

EVENT CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION The cause of the occurrence was inaccurate compensation for the Resistance Temperature Detector (RTD) lead resistance. The RTD are used to monitor river water temperature. The operation of the MDCT was adjested to return the RWAT to within the Technical Specification limits. The RWaI instrumentation was recalibrated by inserting test resistances at the detector end of the leads in lieu of at the cabinet. A revised report will be issued stating the final cause and corrective action by August 15. 1930.

1 l

l l

i