ML19322E609
| ML19322E609 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 03/31/1980 |
| From: | FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19322E604 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004010497 | |
| Download: ML19322E609 (95) | |
Text
c.
4
~
t ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL-OPERATING ' REPORT 1
VOLUME 2 RADIOLOGICAL 3
i 1/1/79 - 12/31/79 CRYSTAL RIVER - UNIT 3 i
FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. DPR-72 DOCKET NO. 50-302 i
March, 1980 i
i i
l l
APPROVED BY: Manager i
Nuclear Support Services
,y DATE:
1
/?fo
"**4010477
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I
Introduction 1
II Milk and Green Leafy Vegetables Census 4
III Media Other than External Radiation 5
IV External Radiation 85 m
9 l
l
[
i
LIST OF TABLES PAGE 2
I-1 Radiological Cavironmental Monitoring Program III-1 Air Inhalation Pathway - Gross Beta Analyses Summary 10 III-2 Air Inhalation Pathway - I-131 Analyses Summary 11 III-3 Air Inhalation Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 12 III-4 Air Inhalation Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of 13 Analyses III-5 Precipitation Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary
~
15 III-6 Precipitation Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 16 III-7 Precipitation Pathway - Tritium Analyses Summary 17 III-8 Sea Water Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 20 III-9 Sea Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 21 III-10 Sea Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Summary 22 III-11 River Water Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 24 III-12 River Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 25 111-13 River Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Summary 26 III-14 Ground Water Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 28 III-15 Ground Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 29 III-16 Ground Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Summary 30 III-17 Potable Water Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 32 f
III-18 Potable Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 33 III-19 Potable Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Summary 34 I
ii
1 LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
PAGE III-20 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway - Gamma Analyses 36 Sunnarie III-21 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses' 37 III-22 Sea Food Chain Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 39 III-23 Sea Food Chain Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 40 III-24 Sea Food Chain Pathway - Sr-89 and 90 Analyses Summary 41 43 III-25 Ingestion Crab Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary III-26 Ingestion Crab Pathway - Gamma Analyses Statistical Evaluation 44 III-27 Ingestion Carnivorous Fish Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 46 III-28 Ingestion Carnivorous Fish Pathway - Gamma Analyses Statistical Evaluation 47 III-29 Ingestion Herbivorous Fish Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 49 III-30 Ingestion Herbivorous Fish Pathway - Gamma Analyses Statistical Evaluation 50 III-31 Ingestion Oysters Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 52 III-32 Ingestion Oysters Pathway - Gamma Analyses Statist *ical Evaluation 53 III-33 Ingestion Shrimp Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 55 l
III-34 Ingestion Shrimp Pathway - Semiannual Gamma Analysis 56 III-35 Ingestion Milk Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 58 III-36 Ingestion Milk Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 59 l
l iii Q
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
PAGE III-37 Ingestion Animals Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 61 III-38 Ingestica Animals Pathway - Gama Analyses Statistical Evaluation 62 III-39 Food Chain (Grasses) Pathway
.Gama Analyses Sumary 64 i
III-40 Food Chain (Grasses) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Statistical Evaluation 65 III-41 Ingestion Food Crops (Citrus) Pathway - Gamma Analyses
. 67 Sumary III-42 Ingestion Food Crops (Citrus) Pathway - Annual Gamma Analysis 68 III-43 Ingestion Food Crops (Watermelon) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Sumary 70 III-44 Ingestion Food Crops (Watermelon) Pathway - Annual Gamma Analysis 71 III-45 Food Chain (Meat) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 73 III-46 Food Chain (Meat) Pathway - Semiannual Gama Analysis 74 III-47 Food Chain (Poultry) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 76 III-48 Food Chain (Poultry) Pathway - Semiannual Gama Analysis 77 III-49 Food Chain (Eggs) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 79 III-50 Food Chain (Eggs) Pathway - Semiannual Gama Analysis 80 III-51 Food Chain (Green Leafy Vegetables) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 82 l
l III-52 Food Chain (Green Leafy Vegetables) Pathwa; - Statistical l
Evaluation of Analyses 83 III-53 Food Chain (Green Leafy Vegetables) Pathway - Sr-90 Analyses Sumary 84 iv
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
!2' PAGE IV-1 Air. Submersion Pathway - TLD Analyses Summary (University of Florida) 86 I V-2 Air Submersion Pathway - TLD Analyses Summary (State of Florida) 87 IV-3 Air Submersion Pathway - TLD Analyses Statistical Eval uation 63 e
e 9
V
I.
INTRODUCTION The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program provides information wnich can be "?ed to assist in assessing the type and quantity of radiation exposure in unrestricted areas resulting from plant operation. The Program is conducted via a contract with the University of Florida, Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Gainesville, Florida and a grant to the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Orlando, Florida.
The parts of the Progran for which each are responsible are listed in Table I-1.
In essence, the Program provdes a continuation of the preoperation program so that any increases of radioactivity in the en-vironment can be detected. No pathway has shown any confirmed increases of radioactivity in the environment due to plant operation during this report period.
The most significant achievement in 1979 was that all nuclides in all path-wdys had annual average Lower Limits of Detection (LLDs) that were equal to or less than that required.
In the summary analysis tables, two terms are used which need explanation.
The term "ND" means that the activity of the nuclide for the samples was non-detectable or less than half of the LLDs for those samples.
The term
"<LLD" means that the activity of the nuclide for the samples was Icss than the LLDs for those samples.
In this way, an apparent change in activity below the lower limits of detection can be trended without getting bogged down in " actual" activity values.
The statistical evaluation of operational analyses were performed using one-fourth the LLD value if the activity was non-detectable and using three-fourths the LLD value if the activity was less than the LLD value.
When a non-detectable or less than LLD concentration used in an evaluation, the results are prefaced with a "<" sign to show that the results do not indicate only detected activity.
Finally, the statistical evaluation of the operational concentrations where there are preoperational results includes the median values.
This is done solely for comparison to preoperational results.
l l
i l
1 l
M Table I-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RESPONSIBILITY PATHWAY SAMPLE STATIONS (l)
University.
Air Submersion C04, C14H*, C14M*, C14G*,
C40, C41, C43, C46 State Air Submersion C0 7, 009, C18, C26 University Air Inhalation C41*
State Air Inhalation C04, C07, C18, C26, C40, C46 State Precipitation C04, C26, C40 University Sea Water C01, C09, Cla, C14H, C14M,
.C14G*
State River Water C15 State Ground Water C40 University Potable Water C07, C10, C18 University Shoreline External C01, C09, C14H*, C14M*,
Sediment C14G*
University Seafood Chain C29, C30 University Ingestion Crab C29*, C30 University Ingestion Fish C29*, C30 (Carnivorous)
University Ingestion Fish C29*, C30 (Herbivorous)
University Ingestion Oysters C29, C30 University Ingestion Shrimp C27 University Ingestion Milk C47, C49*
University Ingestion Animals C45 University Food Chain (Grasses) C05, C40, C41 l
2
Table I-1 (Continued)
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RESPONSIBILITY PATHWAY SAMPLE STATIONS (l)
State Ingestion Food C19 Crops (Citrus)
State Ingestion Food C04 Crops (Watermelon)
University Food Chain (Soil)
C04, C0 7, C18, C26, C4,,0, C41, C46 State Meat C50 State Poultry C51 State Eggs C51 University Food Chain C47, C48*
(Vegetables) i.
l
- Critical Pathway Sample Stations (1) See ETS Table 3.2-4 and Figures 3.2 ' and 3.2-3 for the description and location of all Sample Stations.
3 l
II. MILK AND GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLE CENSUS Envi ronmental Technical Specification 3.2.1 requires a census of animals producing milk for human consumption to be conducted semiannually.
If this census fails to locate any such animals, a census of gardens producing fresh leafy vegetables for human consumption is required annually.
The garden census, required as the result of a lack of findings on the January 16, 1979, milk animal census, was completed on June 14, 1979.
The critical garden (Sample Station C48) was found to be in the east sector at 4.0 miles from the plant.
One Licensee Event Report (LER) was submitted to the Comi ssion.
LER 79-058/04L-0 was the result of not conducting a garden census within the surveillance interval required by Environmental Technical Speci fic_a-tion 3.2.1.2.
However, the late census did not alter the effectiveness of the sampling program because the results of the census were taken into account during the next required garden sample.
A semiannual milk cow survey was completed on June 27, 1979 again with no milk animals found.
The critical station for green leafy vegetables was continued at the garden 4.0 miles frcrn the plant in the east sector.
A seminannual milk cow census was completed by December 31, 1979.
No milk animals were located within five miles of the plant site in tF s survey.
The transmittal letter with report was submitted January 8,1980.
4 o-
AIR INHALATION PATHWAY The Air Inhalation Pathway is one of two pathways split between the Univer-sity and the State.
In addition to the assigned stations, the University operates a station at C47.
Weekly Gross Beta Analysis The sunie.rv for the gross beta analysis is in Table III-1.
Six weekly sam-ples were not collected and analyzed:
C04 for the week of 01-28-79 due to equipment failure.
C41 for the week of 08-03-79 due to power failure.
C41 for the week of 11-02-79 because air filter was not sent with charcoal cartridge.
C46 for the week of 11-05-79 because of operator error.
C47 for the week of 09-21-79 because of annual meter calibration.
C47 for the week of 10-05-79 due to equipment failure.
All other samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical stations for this type of analysis.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-4.
The operational concentrations are similar to the preoperational concentra-tions and are lower than the 1978 operational concentrations.
Weekly I-131 Analysis The summary for the iodine analysis is in Table III-2.
Six weekly samples were not collected and analyzed:
C41 for the week of 06-15-79 because the charcoal cartr'idge fell apart while being removed from the particulate filter.
C41 for the week of 08-03-79 due to power failure.
C41 for the week of 10-05-79 because the pump was reported to be unpl ugged.
C46 for the week of 11-05-79 due to operator error.
C47 for the week of 09-21-79 due to annual meter calibration.
C47 for the week of 10-05-79 due to equipment failure.
High LLDs for the third quarter, Station C41, can be attributed to long l
time elapsed until counting due to equipment failure. High LLDs were noted on 02-09-79and 02-23-79 at Station C47 due to low volume of air collected with faulty pump.
All other samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LL0s equal to or less than those required.
Station C41 is the critical station for this type of analysis and no samples had activity greater than 10 times 5
1 1
the control station's 95 percentile values.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table III-4.
There is no preopera-tional data.
The statistical analysis of the critical and control stations for the period of this report is as follows:
Critical Station Mean Value
= <.012 pCi/m3 Critical Station 95 Percentile Value
= <.040 pCi/m3 Control Stations Mean Value
= <.011 pCi/m3 Control Stations 95 Percentile Value
= <.030 pCi/M3 Ar with the gross beta concentrations, the Iodine-131 concentrations in 1979 were lower than the 1978 concentrations and probably approached the preoperational concentrations.
The' critical station and control station concentrations are less than their respective 1978 concentrations. ' Even though all samples at the critical station resulted in non detectable activity, the 95 percentile concentration appears high because of LLD dif-ferences in the two contractors collecting the data.
I I
l f
7
,e
Quarterly Gamma Analysis The sumary for gama analysis of quarterly composites is in Table III-3.
All samples were collected and analyzed.
High LLDs noted for the fourth quarter at Station C41 were due to decreased sample volumes resulting from loss of the Air Particulate Filter and failure of person changing sample to calibrate flow to one cubic foot per minute.
All other samples were col-lected and analyzed and had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical stations for this. type of analysis.
One Licensee Event Report (LER) was issued to the Commission.
LER 80-014/04L-0 was the result of the air concentration for Thorium-232 exceeding ten times the preoperational level at Sampling Station C41.
The apparent cause of the occurrence was a coal slag pile, located six (6) meters south of the air sampler at Station C41.
The increased air concentration is attributed to the high Th-232 concentra-tion in the coal slag pile.
4 i
8 D.
-. ~... -
i j
- Quarterly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis
- i.
. ~
The analysis of the quarterly samples for Strontium-89 and 90 have not been
~ completed and will be included in Supplement I to this report.
i t
i n
f f
i I
(
i
(
i I? -
i i
I L
t f
i t-i g-l 2----,
- -,-,,-,..n',,,
43,w.,
---,,..-.,-..---n-i w-,. -.-,,,,,....
..-v.-
,~,-,v----,,+w--...w--,y
-r-v
-...r,---.,--..-
v-c, e.=
Table 111-1
(
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01'/01/79-12/31/79 PATHWAY I
TYPE & NO.
I LLD i
ALL LOCATIONS I HIOHEST MEAN LOCATION 1 CONTROL LOCATION INRR cono***u**************************uu************************q******************************************
AIR INHALATION *
(PCI/M3)
- GROSS B 416 *0.008 *0.025( 389 /
416)*C46 *0. 027 (
51/
52)*
SEE COLUMN 4 (0.002-0.210)*
(0. 010-0. q21 )
- 1 4
3 5
Table 11-2 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/79-12/31/79 PATHWAY l
TYPE t< NO I LLD I
ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR co*********************c;n***********************************************************c*x***************
AIR INHALATION *
(PCI/M3)
- IODItJE-131 416 *0.045 * <Lto(
1/
416 )
- c47 * < LLo (
1/
1)*
SEE COLUMN 4
)*
6 t
9
Ro Rc No I* ******************************************
N*
O*
I*
4 4 -
4 4
4 4
T*
A*
N N
N N
N N
C*
M M
M M
M M
O*
U U
U U
U U
L*
L L
L L
L L
O O
O O
O O
L*
C C
C C
C C
O*
R*
E E
E E
E E
T*
E E
E E
E E
N*
S S
S S
S S
O*
C**
9 I* ******************************************
7
/
N*
)
)
)
)
)
)
Y 1
O*
R 3
I*
7 5
0 5
4 0
3 0
4 0
2 2
A
/
T*
1 M 2 2 A*
- 0. ) 0 1
- 0. ) 0
)
)
)
)
M 0 1
C*
9 49 40 40 40 40 U 3 -
O*
7 2
1 5
1 7
S - 9 L*
/3 /0
/ 0
/0 / 0
- /0 0 7 1040 40 10 40 30 M 5 /
N*
1 A
1 A*
0 0
0 0
0
( ('
R 0
E*
(( ((
((
(( ((
G O.
/
M*
7 3
6 5
6 6
O N 1
3 0
3 0
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
R 0
T*
P T S*
E D E*
0 0
0 0
0 0
G K O H***********a*******************************
N C I
G*
I O R I*
1 7
1 1
1 1
R D E H*
4 4
4 4
4 4
O P
C C
C C
C C
T I* ******************************************
I G
)
))
))
)
))
))
3 N
N 2
25 20 2
24 20 O
I 3
30 34 3
32 32 1
M T
S*
0 1
0 1
1 1
R N*
e L
O O*
0 0
0 0
A P
I*
/
/ -
/-
/
/-
/-
l b
C E
T*
1 62 81 1
81 67 a
I 3 R A*
0 0
D D
0 D
D D
0 T
G C*
0 0
N N
0 N
N N
0 O T O*
L I
L*
O O
O O.
O N
(
((
((
(
((
((
U A L*
7 3
9 5
4 O
I D
D L*
3 0
1 0
0 3
A R I
A*
0 0
0 0
0 0
R E R V O 0
O 0
0 O.
O L
I L
l A R F 7
1 6
8 9
0 8
8 8
7 5
I 5
3 1
0 0
4 0
0 0
1 8
L Y D*
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
iE A T L*
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
M T N L*
O N S U O Y O I* ******************************************
R R C S
I C
I 2
V S
S 3 N
U O*
Y E
R N*
L 4
6 2
1 0
6 7
T AYE 4
2 3
3 4
0 3
5 4
5 0
I
&u NLT 1'
2 2
1 1
1 1
9 5
6 4
C ARI E*
ES E
A H
I A
U S
R N
N K
P*
ATO C
R T
D R
C Z
M Z
Y*
MRP T*
MAM AUO w
GGC I* ******************************************
- N
- O I
T)
Y*
A3 A*
LM W*
A/
H*
HI 4
T*
fC A*
IP
~m-P*
(
- R I
- A 1
1 i
4
Table III-4 AIR INHALATION PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/m3)
Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gross Beta Analysis Gross
.029
.12
<.020
<.023
<.049 Iodine Analysis
<.011
<.032 I-131*
Gamma Analysis l
Ce-144
.003
.1 72
<.015
<.015
<.0 28 Ra-226
<.2
.241
<.010
<.008
<.014 Th-232
<.01
.008
<.005
<.008
<.055 I-131
<.0 7
.004
<.003
<.002
<.004 Ba-140
<.01
.016
<.003
<.002
<.004 Ru-106
.025
.216
<.013
<.011
<.019 Cs-137
<.01
.013
<.003
<.003
<.011 Zr-95
.003
.043
<.003
<.002
<.004 l
<.01
<.01
<.003
<.002
<.004 Zn-65
<.01
<.01
<.005
<.004
<.008 K-40
<16.8
<16.8
<.028
<.027
<.064 l
Strontium Analysis
'Sr-89 Sr-90
- Critical nuclide for critical station 13
PRECIPITATION PATHWAY Thc State has the responsibility to collect and analyze precipitation samples. There are no additional stations for the pathway.
Monthly Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the monthly samples is in Table III-5.
All monthly samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical stations in this pathway.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-6.
No operational sample had any detectable activity and the preoperational analyses also had no detectable activity.
The 1979 operational activity of the nuclides determined by gamma analysis are non detectable as were the preoperational,1977 and 1978 operational concentrations.
Monthly Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of the monthly precipitatior, sample is in Table III-7. Two monthly samples were not analyzed:
C04 - No analysis performed on sample collected on 08-06.79.
Sample was spilled during move to new laboratory.
C40 - No analysis performed on sample collected on 08-06-79.
Sample was spilled during move to new laboratory.
All other samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLD's equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical stations in this pathway.
A statistical evalutaion of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-6.
All of the 1979 operational activity data for tritium was less than the Sample LLD(s) as were the 1978 operational activities.
I l
l I
l 14
Ro Rc O
No*****************************
I N* -
O*
I*
T*
A*
C*
O*
L**
L*
O x.
R*
T*
N*
O*
C**
9 I* ****************************
7
/
N*
Y 1
O*
R 3
I*
A
/
T*
M 2 2 A*
M 0 1
C*
U 3 -
O*
S - 9 L*
0 7 I
M 5 /
N*
A 1
A*
R
. 0 E*
G O /
M*
O N 1
R 0
T*
P T S*
E D E*
G K O H*****************************
N C I
G*
I O R I*
R D E H*
O P
T I* ****************************
I G
5 N
N O
I 1
M T
S*
I R
N*
3 L
O O*
e A
P I*
l b
C E
T*
a I
3 R A*
D D
D D
D D
D-D T
G C*
N N
N N
N N
N N
O T O*
L I
L*
O N I
U A L*
D D
L*
A R I
A*
R E R x
V O L
I L
i*****************************
A R F T
7 7
7 7
7 5
0 7
1 L Y D*
1 1
1 1
1 1
3 1
fE A T L*
M T N L*
N S U O Y O I
R R C I
C 6
V S
3 N
U O*
E R
N*
1 0
7 4
T S
3-4 3
3 8
4 5
0 I
I 1
1 1
1 5
5 6
6 C
S E*
AY A
S S
O N
N O
P*
ML I
B C
C C
M Z
C Y*
MA T*
AN GA I
- N
- O I
- T Y*
A A*
T W*
I)
H*
PL T*
I/
A*
CI P*
EC m
- RP P(
9
.i
Table III-6 PRECIPITATION PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/t)
' Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysis I-131
<.4
<.4
<4.3
<4.3
<4.3 Ba-140
<10
<10
<4.3
<4.3
<4.3 Cs-137
<10
<10
<4.3
<4.3
<4.3 Cs-134
<10
<10
<4.3
<4.3
<4.3 Co-58
<10
<10
<4.3
<4.3
<4.3 Mn-54
<10
<10
<3.8
<3.8
<3.8 Zn-65
<20
<20
<7.5
<7.5
<7.5 Co-60
<10
<10
<4.3
<4.3
<320
<320
<150
<150
<150 e
16
Ro Rc 0
No I*
N*
O*
I*
T*
A*
C*
O*
L**
L*
O*
R*
T*
N*
O*
C**
9 I* *******
7
/
N*
Y 1
n*
R 3
I*
A
/
T*
M 2 2
/.
- M 0 1
C*
U 3 -
t*
s S - 9 L*
0 7 M 5 /
N*
A 1
A*
R 0
E*
G O.
/
1i*
O N 1 R
0 7*
P T b*
E D E*
G K O H********
N C I
G*
I O R I*
R D E H*
O P
T I* *******
I G
)
7 N
N 6
O I
3 I
M T
S*
I I
R N*
L O
O*
e A
P I*
/
l b
C E
T*
4 a
I 3 R A*
3 T
G C*
O T O*
L I
L*
O N
(
I U A L*
D D
D L*
L A R I
A*
L R E R V O e
L I
L 1*
A R F T
0 N L Y D*
0 E A T L*
2 M T N L*
N S U O Y O I* *******
R R C I
C 6
V S
3 N
U O*
E R
N*
T S
I MI 3
C US E*
IY H
P*
TL Y*
IA T*
RN TA I
Y*
A*
W*
.)
H*
PL T*
I/
A*
CI P*
ECR C
- P(A i
l
SEA WATER PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze sea water sam-ples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.
Monthly Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of monthly samples is in Table III-8.
All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had annual average LLDs equal to or less than those required.
Sample Station C14G is the critical station in this pathway and no ssnple had activity greater than 10 times the control station value.
A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a camparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-9.
~
The concentrations of nuclides by gamma analysis during 1979 was less than the concentrations during 1978 and the preoperational concentrations.
The critical stations and the contrcl stations concentration were almost iden-tical and both were less than the respective concentrations during 1978.
One Licensee Event Report (LER) was issued to the Commission.
LER 79-016/04-L was the result of ZN-65 having LLDs greater than the required LLDs for January at six stations.
Inadequate sample time was the apparent cause of the greater than required LLDs.
Quarterly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The analysis of the quarterly samples for Sr-89 and 90 have not been com-pleted -and will be included in Supplement I to this report.
r t
18 O
Ouarterly Tritium Analysis The sunnary for the tritium analysis of qua rterly composites is in
. Table III-10. All quarterly composites were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs that were equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical stations for this type of analysis.
A capari son of the preoperational a nd operational analyses is in Table III-9. The operational concentrations in 1979 were less than those in 1978 except for K-40, and less than preoperational concentrations except for I-131 and K-40.
Some preoperational activities that were reported were Tess than the minimal detectable activities and this skewed the statistics downwa rd.
+
I l
I 19 w-
l 1
j1lj!llI' 1l, Ro Rn O
No IcOooOoooOooooooOoooooooooeoooeoooeoaoeeoOooeO
))
))
)
))
))
)
))
))
))
N*
00 08 0
06 07 0
00 06 05 O*
66 62 6
64 6
6 61 6
61 I*
3 T*
2 A*
C*
/-
/-
/
/-
/-
/
/-
/ -
/ -
O*
22 29 1
47 64 1
94 32 78 L*
51 4
3 58 Lu O*
R*
((
((
(
((
((
(
((
((
((
T*
0 7
8 0
5 1
6 5
3 N*
3 1
1 4
1 3
O*
3 C**
9 I* ********************************************
7
))
))
)
))
))
)
)
)
))
/
N*
23 28 2
26 27 2
2 2
25 Y
1 C*
15 12 1
14 1
1 1
1 11 3
R 3
I*
A
/
T*
2 M 2 2 A*
M 0 1
C*
/-
/-
/
/-
/-
/
/
/
/-
U 3 -
O*
92 89 1
28 25 1
1 1
29 S - 9 L*
1 3
11 0 7 2
M 5 /
N*
A 1
A*
R
. 0 E*
(( -
((
(
((
((
(
(
(
((
G O /
M*
4 9
8 2
6 1
0 6
8 O N 1
3 1
1 4
1 1
8 P T S*
4 R
0 T*
E D E*
H*********************M G K O H
N C I
G*
I O R I*
9 9
9 4
9 3
1 9
4 R D E H*
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
1 O
P C
C C
C C
C C
C C
T I* ********************************************
I G
))
))
)
))
))
)
))
))
))
N N
20 28 2
26 27 2
20 26 25 8
O I
76 72 7
74 7
7 71 7
71 M
T S*
3 R
N*
2 I
I L
O O*
I A
P I*
/ -
/-
/
/ -
/ -
/
/-
/-
/-
e C
E T*
32 19 1
53 64 i 1 94 42 88 l
I 3 R A*
61 5
D 3
D 68 b
G C*
N N
a O T O*
T L
I L*
O N
((
((
(
((
((
(
((
((
((
I U A L*
8 7
8 9
5 1
6 5
9 D
D L*
2 1
1 3
1 2
A R I
A*
3 R E R V O L
I L
1* ********************************************
A R F T
2 0
6 0
5 6
8 6
5 1
0 L Y D*
1 1
2 4
1 6
4 fE A T L*
M T N L*
N S U O Y O I
R R C I
C 2
V S
7 N
U P*
E R
N*
6 2
1 0
6 7
5 4
4 5
0 T
S 2
3 3
4 0
3 9
3 5
6 4
I I
2 2
1 1
1 1
1 C
S E*
AY A
H A
U S
R S
N N
P*
ML R
T I
B R
C Z
C M
Z K
Y*
MA T*
AN GA I* ********************************************
Y*
R A*
E)
W*
TG H*
AK T*
H/
A*
I P*
- EP mo S(
i
,i:
iil:
Table 111-9 SEA WATER PATlWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/k9)
Nuclide Preoperational Values 0parational Values fledian 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Control Stations Critical Stations Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysti Ra-226 600
<24.0
<25.1
<51.4
<26.0
<53.5
-<20.8
<37.7 Th-232 7
<l5.0
<13.1
<27.8
<12.9
<27.8
<14.1
<28.2 1-131*
<.4
<.4
<1.5
<1.4
<2.3
<l.5
<2.4
<1.4
<2.2 Ba-140
<10 11
<4.8
<5.1
<9.7
<5.2
<10.1
<4.6
<7.8 Ru-106
<11.5
<13.4 (29.4
<13.6
<29.9
<12.8
<27.0 Cs-137*
<10 10
<1.5
<l.7
<4.0
<l.9
<4.3
<1.3
<2.3 Z r-95
<10
<10
<2.0
<2.2
<4.8
<2.3
<5.1
<2.0
<3.3 N Cs-134*
<10
<10
<l.5
<2.0
<5.5
<2.2
<5.9
<l.3
<2.1 Mn-54
<10
<10
<1.3
<1.4
<3.3
<l.4
<3.3
<l.4
<3.2 Zn-65
<20 7
<2.5
<2.8
<4.7
<2.9
<4.8
<2.6
<3.9 K-40 150.8 368.7
<291.0 <313.2 (888.4
<318.0 (944.0
<289.3
<46 5.3 Strontium Analysis Sr-89 Sr-90 Tritium Analysis H-3 71 87 (89.3 <152.5
<413.85
- Critical nuclides for critical station.
Table 111-10 l
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/79-12/31/79 PATHWAY I
TYPE & NO.
I LLD I
ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR canon***********m****************.xx********************************************************************
SEA WATER (PCI/KG)
- ANALYSIS 24 *
- O H-3, 361
- 668(
1/
24)*C01
- 66B(
1/
4)*
SEE COLUMN 4 N
W
RIVER WATER PATHWAY The State has the responsibili ty to collect and analyze river water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.
Quarterly Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-11.
All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There are no ;ritical stations in this pathway.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a com-parison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-12.
All operational samples had no detectable activity and all preoperational samples also had no detectable activity.
Quarterly Tritium Analysis The sumary for the tritium analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-13.
All samples were collected and analyzed and -all had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical stations in this pathway.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a com-parison with the preoperationa? data is presented in Table III-12.
All ope rational samples had no detectable activity and all preoperational samples also had no detectable activity.
D i
23
i i
l
\\I l
Ro Ro O
N******************************
I N*
O*
I*
T*
A*
C*
O*
L**
L*
O*
R*
T*
N*
O*
C**
9 I* ****************************
7
/
N*
Y 1
O*
R 3
I*
A
/
T*
M 2 2 A*
M 0 1
C*
U 3 -
O*
S - 9 L*
0 7 M 5 /
N*
A 1
A*
G O.
0 E*
R
/
M*
O N 1
R 0
T*
P T S*
E D E*
G K O H*****************************
N C I
G*
I O R I*
R D E H*
O P
T I* ****************************
1 I
G 1
N N
O I
1 M
T S*
1 R
N*
1 L
O Ox e
A P
I*
l b
C E
T*
a I
3 R A*
D D
D D
D D
D D
T G
C*
N N
N N
N N
N N
O T O*
L I
L*
O N U A L*
I D
D L*
A R I A*
R E R V O L
I L I* ****************************
A R F T
7 7
7 7
7 5
0 7
N L Y D*
1 1
1 1
1 1
3 1
E A T L*
M T N L*
N S U O Y O I* ****************************
R R C I
C 4
V S
N U
O_
E R
N*
1 0
8 7
4 0
T S
3 4
5 3
3 4
5 6
I I
1-1 1
1 5
6 C
S E*
AY A
O S
S N
N O
P*
ML I
B C
C C
M Z
C Y*
MA T*
AN GA l
- R
- E Y*
T A*
A)
W*
WG H*
K T*
R/
A*
EI P*
VC mu
- IP R(
li';
l I
l li
,I
Table III-12 RIVER WATER PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pci/kg)
Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysis I-131
<.4
<.4
<4.3
<4.3
<4.3
~
Ba-140
<10
<10
<4.3
<4.3
<4.3 Co-58
<10
<10
<4 3
<4.3
<4.3 Cs-137
<10
<10
<4.3
<4.3
<4.3 Cs-134
<10
<10
<4.3
<4.3
<4.3 Mn-54
<10
<10
<3.8
<3.8
<3.8 Zn-65
<20
<20
<7.5
<7.5
<7.5 Co-60
<10
<10
<4.3
<4.3
<320
<320
<50
<50
<50 i
9 25 c
a
Table 111-13 ENVIRONMEt1TAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/79-12/31/79 PATHWAY I
TYPE & NO.
I LLD i
ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR ocoo***************************************************************************************************
RIVER WATER (PCI/KO)
- ANALYSIS 4*
- O H-3 200
- ND t
4 l
(
GROUND WATER PATHWAY The State has the responsibili ty to collect a nd a nalyze ground water samples. There are no additional stations for this pachway.
Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of semiannual samples is in Table 111-14.
All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data is present-ed in Table III-15. All operational samples had no detectable activity and there is no preoperational data.
Semiannual Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of semiannual samples is in Table III-16.
All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less 'than those required.
There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data is present-ed in Table III-15. All operational samples had no detectable activity and there is no preoperational data.
I 6
27 a
Table 111-14 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/79-12/31/79 PATHWAY I
TYPE & NO.
I LLD I
ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST ME;.A LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR once***************************************************************************************************
GROUND WATER (PCI/KG)
- GAMMA
- ANALYSIS 2*
- O I-131 17
- ND DA-140 17
- ND 4
CO-58 17
- ND m
'ND CS-137 17
- cn CS-134 17
- ND MN-54 15
- ND ZH-65 30
- ND CO-60 17
- ND i
l i
9
Table III-15 GROUND WATER PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)
Nuclide Operational Values Mean 95 Percentile i
Gamma Analysis I-131.
<4.3
<4.3 Ba-140
<4.3
<4.3 Co-58
<4.3
<4.3 Cs-137
<4.3
<4.3 Cs-134
<4.3
<4.3 Mn-54
<3.8
<3.8 Zn-65
<7.5
<7.5 Co-60
<4.3
<50
<50 l
l l
l 29
Ro Rc O
N*
I* *******
N*
O*
I*
T*
A*
C*
O*
L**
L*
O*
R*
T*
N*
O*
C**
9 I* *******
7
/
N*
Y 1
O*
R 3
I*
A
/
T*
M 2 2 A*
M 0 1
C*
U 3 -
O*
S - 9 L*
0 7 M 5 /
N*
A 1
A*
R
. 0 E*
Q O /
M*
D N 1
R 0
T*
P T S*
E D E*
G K O H********
N C I
G*
I O R I*
R D E H*
O P
T I* *******
I O
6 1
N N
O I
1 M
T S*
1 R
N*
1 L
O O*
e A
P I*
C E
T*
l b
I 3 R A*
D a
G C*
N T
O T O*
L I
L*
O N U A L*
I D
D L*
A R I
A*
R E R V O O
L I
L I* *******
A R F T
0 4
L Y D*
0 iE A T L*
2 M T N L*
N S U O Y O I* *******
R R C I
C 2
V S
N U
O*
E R
N*
T S
I MI 3
C US E*
IY H
P*
TL Y*
IA T*
RN TA l* *******
- R
- E
- T Y*
A A*
W)
W*
G H*
DK T*
N/
A*
UI P*
OC 8
- RP G(
9 l
4 POTABLE WATER PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze potable water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.
Quarterly Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-17.
All samp1.es were collected and analyzed and all r.aclides had annual average LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical stations l
in this pathway.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a l
comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-18.
The 1979 operational activity was less than both the 1978 operational concen-trations and the preoperational activity levels.
Quarterly Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of the quarterly samples is in Table III-19.
All samp'es were collected and analyzed. and.all had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical stations in this pathway and all samples had activity that was less than the sample l
LLD.
All preoperational samples had an average activity of less than l
320 pCi/kg.
There was, therefore, probably no increase in activity over j
the preoperational levels and the.1978 operational levels.
I l
31
Ro Ro O
No I* * ***************************
N*
O*
I*
4 4
T*
A*
N N
C*
M M
O*
U U
L*
L L
O O
L*
C C
O*
R*
E E
T*
E E
N*
S S
O*
C**
9 I*
- ******************s********
7
)
)
/
N*
4 4
Y 1
O*
R 3
I*
A
/
T*
M 2 2 A*
M 0 1
C*
/
/
U 3 -
O*
1 1
S - 9 L*
0 7 M 5 /
N*
A 1
A*
R
. 0 E*
(
(
G O /
M*
7 9
O N 1
R 0
T*
P T S*
E D E*
G K O H*****************************
N C I
G*
I O R I*
7 0
R D E H*
0 1
O P
C C
T I* * ****************************
I G
)
)
7 N
N 2
2 1
O I
1 1
M T
S*
1 R
N*
1 1
L O
O*
e A
P I*
/
/
l C
E T*
1 1
a-I 3 R A*
D D
D D
D D
a G
C*
N N
N N
N N
T O T O*
L I
L*
O N
(
(
I U A L*
7 9
D D
L*
A R I
A*
R E R V O e
L I
L 1* * ***************************
A R F T
6 9
S 5
4 4
0 S
N L Y D*
1 1
E A T L*
M T N L*
N S U O Y O I
R R C I
C 2
V S
1 N
U O*
E R
N*
0 7
4 T
S 1
4 3
3 8
4 S
0 I
I 3
1 1
1 S
S 6
6 C
S 1
E*
AY A
S S
D N
N O
P*
ML I
B C
C C
M Z
C Y*
MA T*
AN GA I
- R Y*
E N A*
T)O W*
AGI H*
WKT T*
/S A*
.IE P*
?CG
- rPN wru i
P(I 9
l
.Ill l'li;'
Table III-18 P0 TABLE WATER PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg) t' Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysis I-131
<.4
<.4
<1.8
<1.5
<2.7
~
Ba-140
<10
<10
<5.3
<4.6
<8.9 4
<10 (10
<1.3
<1.7
<5.2 Cs-134
<10 (10
<1.5
<1.9
<6.4 Co-58
<10
<10
<1.0
<1.0
<2.0 Mn-54
<10
<10
<1.0
<1.1
<2.3 Zn-65
<20
<20
<2.8
<2.6
<4.4 Co-60
<10
<10
<1.3
<1.2
<320
<320
<89
<136.9
<306.1 l
1 33
1 Ro R*
O N*
I N*
O I
T.
A*
C*
O.*
L.
L.
O.
R*
T*
NO C.*
9 I* *******
7
/
N*
Y 1
O*
R 3
I*
A
/
T A
M 2 2 M 0 1
C.
U 3 -
O L
6 S - 9 0 7 M 5 /
N*
A 1
A*
R 0
E*
G O /
M*
O N 1
t R
0 T*
P T S*
E D E*
G K O H********
N C I
G*
9 I
O R I.
H.
1 R D E O
P 1
T I* *******
1 1
I G
)
N N
2 e
O I
1 l
M T
S*
b R
N*
a T
L O
O*
A P
I*
/
C E
T*
3 I
3 R A*
G C.
O T O*
L I
L*
O N
(
I U A L*
D D
A.
L i
L*
L A R i R E R V O L I L
1* *******
A R F T
1 N L Y D*
6 E A T L*
3 M T N L*
N S U O Y O I
R R C I
C 2
V S
1 N
U O*
E R
N*
T S
I MI C
US 3
E*
IY P*
TL 1
1 Y*
IA T*
RN TA l
- R Y*
E A*
T)
W.
AG H.
WK T*
/
A*
.I P*
- OP P(
9 4
I
SHORELINE EXTERNAL SEDIMENT PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze shoreline ex-ternal sediment samples.
There are no additional stations for this path-way.
Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-20.
All samples were collected and analyzed and the annual average LL0s for all nuclides were equal to or less than those required.
The critical stations for this analysis are Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station val ue.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-21.
The 1979 operational data is less than the preoperational data and the 1978 operational data for almost every nuclide.
The lack of more operational data prevents a more thorough comparison.
Also, the control station data is similar to the critical station data.
Semiannual Sr-90 Analysis The analysis for the semiannual samples for Sr-90 have not been completed and will be included in Supplement 1 to this report.
4 35
Table 111-20 ENVIRONMElH AL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORINO PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL' RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTINO PERIOD 01/01/79-12/31/79 PATHWAY I
TYPE & NO.
I LLD I
ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION 1 CONTROL LOCATION INRR onno***************************************************************************************************
BOT. SED.
(PCI/KG)
- OAMMA SHORELINE EXT
- ANALYSIS 10 *
- 419(
10/
10)*C14H*
749(
2/
2)*
323(
4/
4)*
(
158-1050)*
(
447-1050)*
(
242-462)*
TH-232 12
- 55(
9/
10)*C14H*
96(
2/
2)*
53(
4/
4)*
(11-181)*
(11-181)*
(
40-67)*
I-131 6*
ND wcn BA-140 17
- 14(
1/
10)*C140*
14(
1/
2)*
O(
O/
4)*
4 RU-106 36
- 33(
1/
10)*C01
- 33(
1/
2)*
33(
1/
4)*
CS-137 5*
19(
7/
10)*C14M*
38(
1/
2)*
15(
4/
4)*
(
6-38)*
(
6-25)*
ZR-95 8*
ND CS-134 5*
7(
5/
10)*C14H*
11(
1/
2)*
6(
3/
4)*
(
4-11)*
(
4-7)*
MN-54 4*
B(
1/
10)*C01
- 8(
1/
2)*
8(
1/
4)*
ZN-65 10
- ND K-40 40
- 245(
10/
10)*C14M*
403(
2/
2)*
205(
4/
4)*
(
131-533)*
(
.272-533)*
(
152-273)*
I e
l s
i n t 6
8 0
2 9
4 1
4 9
0 r n 1
i e
t c
4 8
l 7
5 0
2 2
1 2
4 a r 7
/
1 4
1 6
t e
0 1
5 S
P 1
l 5
a 9 c
i 0
5 4
7 1
4 0
8 1
4 8
t i
n r a 2
8 1
3 8
2 2
3 1
2 0
C e
8 4
(
1 7
M 4
2 e
l s
i n t 0
4 6
3 8
8 6
0 6
2 1
o n i
e t
c 8
4 2
8 9
0 3
9 9
5 4
a r
1 7
3 3
0 t
e 5
3 s S P
eu l
5 l
o 9
)
a r g
V t
3 5
5 9
9 0
1 8
7 6
3.
k n
/
l o n Y
i a C a
3 2
1 4
6 5
2 4
2 2
5 A
C n
e 2
5 1
1 0
W p
o M
3 2
l i
(
i T
t A
S a
P E
r S
e T
Y p e N
L O
l E
A i
M N
t 8
6 1
6 4
7 0
9 1
0 0
1 I
A n
2 D
e E
F c
1 7
2 7
8 6
3 0
6 4
0 I
S O
r 0
4 2
3 1
8 I
e 9
1 4
I L
N P
A O
e N
I 5
l R
T 9
b E
A a
T U
T X
L 5
4 2
6 4
0 2
8 5
6 1
E A
n V
a 8
0 l
4 1
3 2
4 l
2 4
E E
e 1
5 1
1 4
M 4
2 t
i L
L A
E C
R I
n 0
5 5
3 3
0 8
3 0
3 0
0l T
a 0
4 1
4 9
2 l
2 1
2 5
S i
Si I
d 5
3
(
1 0
T e
3 2
A M
n T
S o
i ta s e t
e l
s u
i l
t l
a n 0
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 9
6 a
V e
0 0
3 1
9 5
4 1
1 0
c 0,
3 6
2 0,
c i
t l
r a e 0
1 i
n P 1
r o
c i
5 t
9 r
a o
r f
e p
n s
s 8
o a 0
0 4
0 0
0 2
0 0
i e
e i
0 9
1 9
1 1
1 1
9 s
d r d 9
1 5
y i
P e
s 2
2 l
l M
i a
c s
n u
y A
n la m
l n
u a
e A
i c
d 6
2 0
6 7
4 t
i i
a 2
3 1
4 0
3 5
3 4
5 n
0 t
l m
2 2
3 1
1 1
9 1
5 6
0 o
9 i
c m
1 4
r r
u a
a h
a u
s r
s n
n t
r C
N G
R T
I B
R C
Z C
H Z
K S
S
SEA FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze marine plants in the sea food chain. There are no additional stations for this pathway.
Semiannual Gamma Analysis The sunnary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-22. All sanples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical stations in this pathway.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-23.
The 1979 operational concentrations are less than both the 1978 operational and the preoperational concentrations.
Semiannual Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The summary for the strontium analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-24. All sanples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had annual average LL0s equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical stations in this pathway.
A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data is presented in Table 111-23.
There is no preoperational data.
The 1978 and 1979 operational concentrations are very similar.
One Licensee Event Report (LER) was issued to the Commission.
LER 79-112/04X-0 was the result of Sr-90 having an LLD greater than the re-quired LLO for the first half at C29.
Inadequate sample time was the apparent cause of the greater than required LLD.
38
'I R*
R*
O N** * ************************************
I N*
O*
I*
4 4
4 4
4 T*
A*
N N
N N
N C*
M M
M M
M O*
U U
U U
U L*
L L
L L
L O
O O
O O
L*
C C
C C
C O*
R*
E E
E E
E T*
E E
E E
E N*
S S
S S
S O*
C**
9 I*
- ***************e********************
7
))
))
)
)
))
/
'N
- 28 25 2
2 20 Y
1 O*
2 2
2 R
3 I*
6 1
A
/
T*
M 2 2 A*
M 0 1
C*
/-
/-
/
/
/ -
S - 9 L*
2 2
1 1
22.
U 3 -
O*
23 23 6
0 7 5
M 5 /
N*
A 1
A*
G O /
M*
6 4
9 3
((
R
. 0 E*
((
((
(
(
1 O N 1
2 2
9 R
0 T*
0 1
P T S*
E D E*
G K O H**************************************
N C I
Gx I
O R I*
0 0
9 9
0 R D E E*
3 3
2 2
3 2
O P
C C
C C
C 2
T I* * ************************************
I G
))
))
)
)
))
1 N
N 48 43 4
4 40 1
O I
2 2
2 1
M T
S*
6 e
R N*
1 l
b L
O O*
a A
P I*
/-
/ -
/
/
/-
T C
E T*
33 46 1
1 47 I
3 R A*
2 D
D D
D D
2 G
C*
.N N
N N
N O T O*
L I
L*
O N
((
((
(
(
((
I U A L*
S O
9 3
9 D
D L*
2 2
77 A R I
A*
R E R V O L
I L
I* * ************************************
A R F T
8 6
4 2
9 4
5 3
7 8
N L Y D*
1 2
2 E A T L*
M T N L*
N S U O Y O I* * ************************************
R R C I
C 4'
V S
N U
O*
E R
N*
6*
2 0
6 7
5 4
T S
2 3
1 4
0 3
9 5
5 I
I 2
2 3
1 1
1 6
0 C
S 1
4 E*
AY A
H A
U S
R N
N P*
ML R
T I
B R
C Z
M Z
K Y*
MA T*
AN GA
- 3********************3:***********
l N
- T I
- N A
- A H Y*
L C A*
P W*
D H*
EOO T*
NKO A*
I/F P*
RIA
- MPS 9
i l
l'
Table III-23 SEA F000 CHAIN FATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF' ANALYSES (pCi/kg)
Nuclide Preoperational Values Ocerational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysis Ra-226 624 3300 23.0
<18.8
<42.4 280 23.5 19.5
~
<10 37
<0.9
<0.9
<1.2 Ba-140
<10 75
<2.9
<2.9
<4.3 360
<7.3
<7.2
<12.3 Ru-106 Cs-137
<10 181
<1.1
<2.9
<10.9 Zr-95 18 157
<1.4
<1.3
<10.0 Mn-54 43
<1.0
- <1.4
<3.5 156
<2.0
<1.8
<3.1 Zn-65 K-40 1508.4 12570 734.5 779.0 2087.1 Strontium Analysis
<9.6
<34.9 Sr-83
<0.5
<1.3 Sr-9.1 i
40 l
L
Table iIl-24 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/79-12/31/79 PATHWAY I
TYPE 8e NO.
I LLD 1
ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCA unococe***************************************************.**************** TION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR
- -zxa*************
MAR. PLANT (PCI/KG)
- SR89/90 SEAFOOD CH
- ANALYSIS 4*
- O SR-89 5*
18(
2/
4)*C29
- 28(
1/
2)*-
SEE COLUMN 4
(
9-28)*
SR-90 1
- 1(
1/
4)*C29
- 1(
1/
2)*
SEE COLUMN 4 b
1 j
i INGESTION CRAB PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze crabs.
There are no additional stations for this pathway.
Semiannual Gamma Analysis 2
The summary for the gamma analysis of the edible portion of semiannual sam-ples is in Table III-25.
All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required. Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-26.
Except for naturally occurring Ra-226 and K-40, the 1979 operational con-centrations are less than both the 1978 operational and preoperational con-centrations.
The concentrations of the critical and control stations dur-ing 1978 were in close agreement.
One Licensee Event Report (LER) was issued to the Commission.
LER 79-016/04-L was the result of Zn-65 having LLDs greater than the required LLDs for the first half at Stations C29 and C30.
Inadequate sample time was the apparent cause of the greater than required LLDs.
S 42
Table 111-25 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/79-12/31/79 PATHWAY I
TYPE & NO.
I LLD I
ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR onocoo*************************************************************************************************
CRABS (PCI/KG)
- GAMMA INGESTION
- ANALYSIS 4 *
- 153(
3/
4)*C29
- 193(
2/
2)*
72(
1/
2)*
(
72-280)*
(
106-280)*
TH-232 11
- 26(
2/
4)*C29
- 28(
1/
2)*
24(
1/
2)*
(
24-28)*
I -131 8*
ND w
w DA-140 21
- ND A
RU-106 69
- ND CS-137 10
- 11(
2/
4)*C29
- 12(
1/
2)*
10(
1/
2)*
(
10-12)*
m ZR-95 10
- ND N
CS-134 6*
ND l
l MN -54 6*
ND l
j i
ZN -65 16
- ND u
K-40 107
- 3205(
3/
4)*C29
- 3308(
2/
2)* 3000(
1/
2)*
( 2640- 3975)*
( 2640- 3975)*
Table III-26 INGESTION CRAB PATIMAY SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)
Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median itean 95 Percentile Control Stations Critical Stations Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 1325 3600
<89.0
<115.1
<346.6
<37.1 193.0 434.2 Th-232 92 170
<12.6
<13.6
<41.9
<12.5
<14.6
<51.7 1-131*
<10
<10
<1.9
<1.9
<3.0
<1.8
<2.0
<3.4 Ba-140
<10 55
<4.9
<5.3
<12.1
<4.9-
<S.6
<15.0 Ru-106
<16.6
<17.3 (20.3
<16.6
<17.9
<22.4 Cs-137*
<10 75
<6.5
<7.0
<16.2
<6.5
<7.5~
<20.0 Zr-95
<10 13
<2.5
<2.6
<5.0
<2.5
<2.6
<5.7 Cs-134*
<10
<10
<l.0
<l.6
<3.4
<1.5
<1.6
<4.1 Mn-54
<80 24
<1.4
<l.4
<3.0
<1.4
<1.5
<3.6
<4.0
<4.1
<7.0
<4.0
<4.1
<7.9 Zn-65
<160 127 K-40 1424.6 2011.2
<2820.0 <2412.5
<5709.9
<1517.5 3307.5 5157.7
- Critical nuclides for critical station 9
INGESTION CARNIV0ROUS FISH PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze carnivorous fish. There are no additional stations for this pathway.
Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the edible portion of semiannual sam-ples is in Table III-27.
All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-28.
The operational concentrations for 1979 are less than both the 1978 opera-tional and the preoperational concentrations except for naturally occurring K-40 where the concentrations were similar.
O I
I 45
R*
R*
O N*******************************************
I
))
))
))
)
))
N*
28 20 24 2
20 O*
6 4
2 0
I*
9 T*
2 A*
C*
/-
/ -
/-
/
/ -
O*
25 20 21 O
20 L*
4 2
2 0
7 L*
2 O*
R*
((
((
((
(
((
T*
7 0
3 O
0 N*
S 3
2 0
O*
8 C*
2 9
I* ***************************************)**
7
))
))
))
)
)
/
N*
28 20 25 2
20 Y
1 O*
6 4
6 09 R
3 I*
A
/
T*
2 M 2 2 A*
1 C*
/-
/-
/-
/
/ -
M 0 U 3 -
O*
23 20 24 1
- 20 S - 9 L*
4 2
1 0
0 7 7
M 5 /
N*
2 A
1 A*
((
((
((
(
((
R
. 0 E*
G O /
M*
7 0
0 9
0 O N 1
5 3
4 0
R 0
T*
8 P T S*
2 E D E*
G K O H******************************************
N C I
G*
I O R I*
0 0
9 9
0 R D E H*
3 3
2 2
3 7
O P
C C
C C
C 2
T I* *****************************************
I G
))
))
))
)
))
I N
N 48 40 45 4
40 I
O I
6 4
6 0
I M
T S*
9 e
R N*
2 l
b L
O O*
a A
P I*
/-
/-
/-
/
/-
T C
E T*
42 44 44 1
40 I
3 R A*
2 1
D D
D 1
D D
D 4
G C*
N N
N N
N N
1 O T O*
2 L
I L*
O N
((
((
((
(
((
I U A L*
1 5
1 9
5 D
D L*
4 2
3 0
5 A R I
A*
R E R 2
V O L
I L
I* * ****************************************
A R F T
2 0
7 4
1 6
0 7
5 4
6 L Y D*
1 1
2 S
1 1
5 4
!E A T L*
M T N L*
N S U O Y O I
R R C I
C 4
V S
N U
0*
E R
f*
6*
2 1
0 6
7 5
4 4
5 0
4 T
S 2
3 3
4 0
3 9
3 5
6 4
I I
2 2
1 1
1 1
1 C
S E*
AY A
H A
U S
R S
4 4
i r
P*
ML R
T I
B R
C Z
C M
Z K
Y*
MA T*
AN OA l******************************************
Y*
N A*
)O W*
HOI H*
SKT T*
I/S A*
FIE P*
CG
.PN 9
C(I
e l
s i
4 5
7 7
0 2
2 7
0 1
0 n t o n i
e 1
8 l
5 3
0 2
l 1
4 4
t c
3 3
1 1
1 0
a r 1
4 t
e 2
S P
l 5
a 9 c
5 5
4 6
5 5
9 4
0 1
0 i
t i
n 4
0 l
4 9
9 l
l l
6 0
r a 2
2 3
1 C
e 2
M 2
e l
s i
n t o n i
e t
c a r t
e s S P
eu l
5 l
o 9 a r 5
0 3
3 9
5 0
0 6
4 0
V tn l
o n 6
0 2
7 5
2 3
2 l
4 0
a C a
5 3
1 2
0 Y
)
n e
8 A
g o
M 2
W k
i H
/
t T
i a
A C
r P
p e
(
p e H
O l
S S
i 3
2 9
0 2
2 7
4 0
3 6
I I
t 8
F S
n 2
V e
1 7
2 9
0 6
3 2
2 0
0 S
c 8
4 2
7 1
0 I
U A
r
(
2 O
N e
3 I
I R
A P
0 e
V A
5 l
I 4
9 t
b N
P a
R A
5 3
8 9
7 0
4 7
3 3
0 T
A G
C n
0 5
l 5
2 1
2 1
l 5
5 L
a 4
2 1
3 0
l A
e 5
i 0
U M
2 I
N T
N S
A 0
5 8
0 5
5 8
3 4
0 1
I n
E M
a 6
3 l
6 3
7 2
l l
4 0
N E
i 3
2
(
1 1
9 I
S d
4 e
2 M
no i
ta s e t
e l
s u
i l
t l
a n 8
a V
e 0
2 0
2 3
2 0
0 9
c c
0 9
1 7
4 1
1 8
9 4
i l
r 4
(
5 t
a e 2
8 i
n P 3
r o
c i
5 t
9 r
a o
r f
ep n 4
s o a 5
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 e
e i
3 1
1 1
1 1
8 6
6 d
r d 3
1 4
i P
e 3
l M
2 c
u n
l a
e c
d 6
2 0
6 7
4 i
i 2
3 1
4 0
3 5
3 4
5 t
l 2
2 3
1 1
1 9
1 5
6 0
i c
1 4
r u
a h
a u
s r
s n
n C
N R
T 1
B R
C Z
C M
Z K
U
INGESTION HERBIV0ROUS FISH PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect a nd analyze herbivorous fish. There are no additional stations for this pathway.
Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the edible portion of semiannual sam-ples is in Table III-29.
The sample for the second half at C29 was collec-ted and counted but values were not reported because the sample was only 202 grams. Since the first half data at C30 had slightly high LLDs due to the small size of the sample collected, the data was not reported.
All other samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required. Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the con-trol station value. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-30.
The 1979 operational concentrations are lower than both the 1978 operation-al and preoperational concentrations.
One Licenses Event Report (LER) was issued to the Commission.
LER 79-016/04-L was the result of Zn-65 having LLDs greater than the re-quired LLDs for the first half at Stations C29 and C30.
Inadequate sample time was the apparent cause of the greater than required LLDs.
l I
48
l i
l 1l ll Ro Ro O
N*
I* ****************************************
)
)
)
)
N*
1 1
1 1
O*
I*
T*
A*
C*
/
/
/
/
O*
1 1
1 1
L**
L*
O*
R*
(
(
(
(
T*
4 7
2 O
N*
5 2
2 2
O*
1 C*
3 u
9 I* ****************************************
7
)
)
)
)
/
N*
1 1
1 1
Y 1
O*
R 3
I*
A
/
T*
M 2 2 A*
M 0 1
C*
/
/
/
/
U 3 -
O*
1 1
1 1
S - 9 L*
0 7 M 5 /
N*
A 1
A*
R 0
E*
(
(
(
(
G O /
M*
6 8
2 O
O N 1
6 2
2 2
R 0
T*
1 P T S*
3 E D E*
G K O H*****************************************
N C I
G*
I O R I*
9 9
0 0
R D E H*
2 2
3 3
O P
C C
C C
T I* ****************************************
9 I
G
))
))
)
))
2 N
N 26 28 2
20 O
I 6
2 2
1 M
T S*
1 1
R N*
3 1
L O
O*
e A
P I*
/-
/-
/
/-
C E
T*
24 27 1
28 l
b I
3 R A*
5 2
D D
D D
D D
D 5
a G
C*
N N
N N
N N
N 8
T O T O*
L I
L*
O N
((
((
(
((
I U A L*
0 8
2 9
D D
L*
6 2
2 8
A R I
A*
9 R E R 1
V O L
I L
I* ****************************************
A R F T
7 5
8 7
8 9
3 9
8 0
3 L Y D*
1 1
2 6
1 2
7 1
fE A T Lx M T N L*
N S U O Y O I*
R R C I
C 4
N S
U O*
IE R
N*
6 2
1 0
6 7
4 T
S 2
3 3
4 0
3 5
3 4
5 I
I 2-2 1
1 1
1 9
1 5
6 0
C S
4 E*
AY A
H A
U S
R S
N N
P*
ML R
T I
D R
C Z
C M
Z K
Y*
MA T*
AN GA I*
Y*
N A*
)O W*
GI H*
HKT T*
S/S A*
IIE P*
FCJ 3
.PN H(I i
Table 111-30 INESTION llERBlVOROUS FISil PATlWAY SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)
Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Control Stations Critical Stations Hean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 960 3100 60.0 60.0 76.6 54.0 66.0 Th-232 84 27.5 27.5 28.9 27.0 28.0 1-131*
<10
<10
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0 E5 Ba-140
<10 50
<6.8
<6.8
<7.4
<7.0
<6.5 Ru-106 90
<16.9
<16.9
<20.7
<15.5
<18.3 Cs-137*
<10 110
<12.3
<12.3
<39.3 22.0
<2.5 Zr-95
<10 9
<3.3
<3.3
<3.3
<3.3
<3.3 Cs-134*
<10
<10
<2.1
<2.1
<2.5
<2.0
<2.3 Mn-54
<80
<80
<1.9
<l.9
<2.2
<l.8
<2.0 Zn-65
<160 63
<5.0
<5.0
<5.7
<4.8
<5.3 K-40 2178.8 3100.6 1989.0 1989.0 5124.0 3120.0 8 58. 0
- Critical nuclides for-critical station
INGESTION OYSTERS PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect a nd analyze oysters.
There are no additional stations for this pathway.
Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gama analysis of the edible portion of semiannual 4
samples is in Table III-31.
All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those ' required.
There are no critical stations in this pathway.
A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-32.
The 1979 operational' concentrations are lower than both the 1978. opera-tional and preopoerational concentrations.
51 L
A
f Ro Rc O
No In*************************************
N*
O*
I*
4 4
4 4
4 T*
A*
N N
N N
N C*
M M
M M
M O*
U U
U U
U L*
L L
L L
L O
O O
O O
L*
C C
C C
C O*
R*
E E
E E
E T*
E E
E E
E N*
S S
S S
S O*
C**
9 i**************************************
7
))
))
)
)
))
/
N*
26 26 2
2 20 Y
1 O*
5 4
7 R
3 I*
2 A
/
T*
1 M 2 2 A*
M 0 1
C*
/-
/-
/
/
/-
U 3 -
O*
24 23 1
1 28 S - 9 L*
3 2
3,
0 7 7
M 5 /
N*
A 1
A*
R
. 0 E*
((
((
(
(
((
G O /
M*
5 5
8 6
4 O N 1
4 3
3 0
R 0
T*
0 P T S*
1 E D E*
G K O H**************************************
O N C I
G*
I O R I*
0 0
0 9
0 R D E H*
3 3
3 2
3 O
P C
C C
C C
T I* *************************************
I G
))
))
)
)
))
)
3 N
N 46 46 4
4 40 O
I 5
4 7
M T
S*
2 1
1 R
N*
1 1
L O
O*
e A
P I*
/ -
/ -
/
/
/-
l C
E T*
46 40 1
1 31 b
I 3 R A*
1 2
D D
D D
D 5
T N
5 a
G C*
N N
N N
O T O*
L I
L*
O N
((
((
(
(
((
I U A L*
6 9
8 6
3 D
D L*
3 2
3 5
A R I A*
8 R E R V O L
I L
1* *************************************
A R F T
0 4
9 9
O 2
0 6
2 9
N L Y D*
1 1
2 S
1 1
1 2
E A T Lx 1
M T N L*
N S U O Y O I
R R C I
C 4
V S
4 U
O*
lE R
N*
6 2
1 0
6 7
5 4
5 0
T S
2 3
3 4
0 3
9 5
6 4
I I
2*
2 1
1 1
1 C
S E*
AY A
H A
U S
R N
N P*
ML R
T I
B R
C Z
M Z
K Y*
MA T*
AN GA I* *************************************
Y*
N A*
)O W*
SGI H*
RKT T*
E/S A*
TIE P*
SCG f
- YPN O(I b
J Table III-32 INGESTION OYSTERS PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)
Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 534 35.5 35.8 67.9 25.5 29.3 52.1 Th-232 I-131
<10
<10
<3.1
<4.0
<9.4 Ba-140
<10
<10
<4.3
<7.2
<14.2 Ru-106 82
<17.0
<19.6
<42.2 Cs-137
<10
<10
<3.0
<3.1
<7.5 Zr-95
<10
<10
<2.6
<2.6
<4.5 Mn-54
<80
<80
<1.4
<1.4
<2.4 Zn-65
<160 33
<2.9
<2.9
<4.3 K-40 1843.6
<644.5
<650.3
<1644.1 53
INGESTION SHRIMP PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze shrimp.
There are no additional stations for this pathway.
Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-33.. The samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical stations, in this pathway.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-34.
The 1979 operational concentrations are lower than both the 1978 operation-al and preoperational concentrations except for K-40.
O 54 9
i :
Ro Ro O
N*
I* *************************************
N*
O*
I*
4 4
4 4
T*
A*
N N
N N
C*
M M
M M
O*
U U
U U
L*
L L
L L
O O
O O
L*
C C
C C
O*
R*
E E
E E
T*
E E
E E
N*
S S
S S
O*
C**
9 I* *************************************
7
))
))
)
))
/
N*
20 20 2
20 Y
1 O*
7 4
7 R
3 I*
3 A
/
T*
2 M 2 2 A*
M 0 1
C*
/-
/-
/
/-
U 3 -
O*
24 28 1
20 S - 9 L*
6 1
3 0 7 4
M 5 /
N*
1 A
1 A*
R
. 0 E*
((
((
(
((
G O /
N*
7 9
6 0
O N 1
6 2
1 0
R 0
T*
9 P T S*
1 E D E*
O K O H*************************4************
N C I
G*
I O R I*
7 7
7 7
R D E H*
2 2
2 2
O P
C C
C C
T I* *************************************
3 I
G
))
))
)
))
3 N
N 20 20 2
20 O
I 7
4 7
1 H
T S*
3 1
1 R
N*
2 L
O O*
e A
P I*
/-
/ -
/
/-
l b
C E
T*
24 28 1
20 3 R A*
6 1
D D
D D
D D
3 a
I T
G C*
N N
N N
N N
4 O T O*
1 L
I L*
O N
((
((
(
((
U A L*
7 9
6 0
I D
D L*
6 2
1 0
A R I
A*
9 R E R 1
V O L
I L
l A R F T
4 3
7 3
7 7
1 7
6 5
l L Y Dx 1
1 2
S 1
1 7
lE A T Lz M T N L*
N S U O Y O I
R R C I
C 2
V S
N U
O*
E R
N*
6 2
1 0
6 7
0 T
S 2
3 3
4 0
3 5
4 5
4 I
I 2
2 1
1 1
1 9
5 6
C S
'.Y A
H A
U S
R N
N E*
aL R
T I
B R
C Z
N Z
K P*
- A Y*
t T*
AN GA l* *************************************
Y*
N A*
)O W*
OI H*
PKT T*
M/S A*
IIE P*
RCG
- HPN S(I il!
lllllll
Table III-34 INGESTION SHRIMP PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSES (pC1/kg)
Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median thgn 95 Percentile Ra-226 67.0 67.0
'75.3 Th-232 36 29.0 29.0 59.5
~
<10
<10
<1.8
<1.8
<1.8 Ba-140
<10
<10
<5.8
<5.8
<5.8 Ru-106
<14.3
<14.3
<17.7 Cs-137
<10 37
<8.9
<8.9
<28.6 Zr-95
<10
<10
<2.8
<2.8
<3.4 Mn-54
<80
<80
<1.6
<1.6
<2.0 Zn-65
<160
<160
<3.9
<3.9
<4.2 K-40 921.8 2514 1900.0 1900.0 3202.8 I
l l
l
INGESTION MILK PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze milk.
There are no additional stations for this pathway.
Monthly Gamma Analysis The sunnary for the gamma analysis of the monthly samples is in Table III-35.
The samples at Sample Station C49 were not collected due to the unavailability of milk.
All other samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had annual average LLDs equal to or less than those re-qui red.
Sample Station C49 is the critical station for this type of analysis. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-36.
The 1979 operational concentrations are less than both the 1978 opera'tional and the preoperational concentrations.
Monthly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The analysis for the monthly samples for Sr-89 and 90 have not been completed and will be included in Supplement 1 to this report.
t 57
Table 111-35 ENVIRONMEl4TAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAN
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/79-12/31/79 PATHWAY I
TYPE & NO.
I LLD I
ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR
- nono*********************************************************p****************************************
MILK (PCI/L)
- GAMMA INGESTION
- ANALYSIS 24 *
- O I -131 6*
ND O
d HA-140 19
- ND CS-137 6*
15(
10/
12)*C47
- 15(
10/
12)*
15(
10/
12)*
(
9-35)*
(
9-35)*
(
9-35)*
ZR-95 9*
14(
1/
12)*C47
- 14(
1/
12)*
14(
1/
12)*
CS-134 7*
4(
1/
12)*C47
- 4(
1/
12)*
4(
1/
12)*
CO-SB 5*
6(
1/
12)*C47
- 6(
1/
12)*
6(
1/
12)*
MN-54 6*
ND CD-60 6*
4(
1/
12)*C47
- 4(
1/
'2)*
4(
1/
12)*
4 4
I l
9 Table 111-36 INGESTION MILK PATilWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg) riuclide Prennerational Values Operational Values tiediaq 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Control Stations Critical Stations Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Jianma Analysis I-131*
<10
<10
<1.3
<1.4
<2.6
<1.4
<2.6 NC/M NC/M Ba-14'O
<30
<30
<3.5
<4.8
<9.6
<4.8
<9.6 NC/M NC/M Cs-137 16 22
<11.0
<12.6
<29.7
<12.6
<29.7 NC/M NC/M Zr-95
<20
<20
<3.1
<3.3
<10.2
<3.3
<10.2 NC/M NC/M Cs-134
<10
<10
<2.3
<1.9
<3.9
<1.9
<3.9 NC/M NC/M Mn-54
<10
<10
<1.5
<1.4
<2.7
<1.4
<2.7 tic /M NC/M Co-58
<10
<10
<1.5
<1.7
<4.6
<1.7
<4.6 NC/M NC/M Co-60
<10
<10
<2.1
<1.9
<3.9
<1.9
<3.9 NC/M NC/M
' Strontium Analysis Sr-89 Sr-90 4.0 6.0
- Critical nuclides for critical station
INGESTION ANIMAL PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze small terres-trial animals. There are no additional stations for this pathway.
Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gama analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-37. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical sample stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-38.
The operational concentrations for 1979 are lower than both the 1978 opara-tional and the preoperational concentrations except for Cs-137 and K-40.
Cs-137 is still elevated due to residual Chinese weapons test fallout; K-40 concentration is similar to preoperational concentration.
W W
i E
60 e
Table III-37 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 31/01/79-12/31/79 PATHWAY l
TYPE & NO.
I LLD i
ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST NEA unco*****************************************************************N LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR
- z***************
ANIMALS (PCI/KG)
- GAMMA INGESTION
- ANALYSIS 2*
- O a
- 49(
1/
2)*C45
- 49(
1/
2)*
SEE COLUMN 4 TH-232 10
- 38(
1/
2)*C45
- 38(
1/
2)*
SEE COLUMN 4 I -131 7*
ND BA-140 21
- ND
~
RU-106 45
- ND CS-137 6*
314(
1/
2)*C45
- 314(
1/
2)*
SEE COLUMN 4 2R -95 8*
ND MN -54 4*
ND ZN -65 15
- ND K - 40 224
- 1760(
2/
2)*C45
- 1760(
2/
2)*
SEE COLUMN 4
( 1400- 2120)*
( 1400- 2120)*
~
Table III-38 INGESTION ANIMALS PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)
Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile 720
<25.8
<25.8
<20.0 20.0
<69.9 I-131
<10 100
<1.8
<1.8
<3.8 Ba-140
<10
<10
<5.3
<5.3
<11.5
<11.1
<11.1
<18.2 Ru-106 Cs-137
<10 80
<157.6
<157.5
<591.1 Zr-95
<10 70
<1.9
<1.9
<2.9 Mn-54
<80
<80
<1.0
<1.0
<1.7 Zn-65
<160 160
<3.6
<3.6
<4.7 K-40 1656.5 3586.6 1760.0 1760.0 2757.9 b
62 4
1 FOOD CHAIN (GRASSES) PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze grass sam-pl es. There are no additional stations for this pathway.
Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-39. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had annual average LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There are no critical stations in this pathway.
A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-40.
The 1979 operational concentrations are similar to the 1978 operational and preoperational concentrations except for K-40.
One Licensee Event Report (LER) was issued to the Commission.
LER 79-112/04X-0 was the result of the Zn-65 havi ng an LLD greater than the required LLO for the second half at C05.
Inadequate sample time was the apparent cause of the greater than required LLD.
e l
l
$3
ll1 l
Ro Rc 0
No I* **************************************
N*
O*
I*
4 4
4 4
4 4
T*
A*
N N
N N
N N
C*
M M
M M
M M
O*
U U
U U
U U
L*
L L
L L
L L
O O
O O
O O
L*
C C
C C
C C
O*
R*
E E
E E
E E
T*
E E
E E
E E
N*
S S
S S
S S
O*
C**
9 I* **************************************
7
))
))
)
))
)
))
/
N*
23 25 2
22 2
20 Y
1 O*
0 1
5 7
R 3
I*
2 1-4 5
A
/
T*
2 M 2 2 A*
M 0 1
C*
/-
/-
/
/-
/
/-
U 3 -
O*
22 28 1
27 1
20 S - 9 L*
7 0
4 8
0 7 1
2 R
M 5 /
N*
2 A
1 A*
G O.
0 E*
R
((
((
(
((
(
((
/
M*
8 2
3 0
1 5
O N 1
3 1
7 5
1 2
R 0
T*
1 1
3 4
P T S*
2 E D E*
G K O H***************************************
N C I
G*
I O R I*
5 0
0 0
S 5
R D E H*
0 4
4 4
O 0
O P
C C
C C
C C
T I* **************************************
I G
))
))
)
))
)
))
9 N
N 63 65 6
62 6
60 3
O I
0 1
5 7
M T
S*
2 1
4 5
1 R
N*
2 1
L O
O*
1 A
P I*
/-
/ -
/
/-
/
/-
e C
E T*
64 65 1
65 1
50 l
I 3 R A*
2 2
D D
D D
2 ba G
C*
N N
N N
1 T
O T O*
1 L
I L*
O N
((
((
(
((
(
((
I U A L*
0 1
3 4
1 4
D D
L*
9 7
7 7
1 0
A R I
A*
1 0
R E R 2
V O L
I L
Ix.********************************4*****
A R F a
T 5
4 8
5 9
8 1
6 5
6 N L Y D*
1 1
2 5
1 1
8 E A T L*
M T N L*
N S U O Y O I* **************************************
R R C I
C 6
V S
N U
O*
E R
N*
6 2
1 0
6 7
5 4
5 0
T S
2 3
3 4
0 3
9 5
6 4
I I
2 2
1 1
1 1
C S
E*
AY A
H A
U S
R N
N P*
ML R
T I
B R
C Z
N Z
K Y*
MA T*
AN GA I* **************************************
N Y*
I A*
)A W*
GH H*
KC T*
S/
A*
SID P*
- RPO mu
- G(F l
.l i
- i I
Table III-40 F000 CHAIN (GRASSES) PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL GAtif1A ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)
Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 2363 66.0 90.0 219.9 Th-232 120 69.0 70.7 147.0
~
<10
<10
<2.0
<1.9
<2.9 Ba-140 26 253
<6.3
<6.3
<9.9 Ru-106
<16.1
<24.6
<72.1 Cs-137 1363 5416 153.5 173.7 505.2 Zr-95
<10 31
<2.5
<2.8
<4.7 Mn-54
<1.5
<3.9
<10.7 Zn-65 589
<3.4
<3.8
<6.4 K-40 578.2 2430.2
<1935.0
<1677.5
<3589.0 i
l 1
65 I
~
)
INGESTION FOOD CR0PS (CITRUS) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze citrus samples.
There are no additional stations in this pathway.
Annual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the annual samples is in Table III-41. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There is no critical sample stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a
compa rison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-42.
The 1979 operational concentrations were non detectable as were the 1978 operational and the preoperational concentrations.
l 9
66
Ro Ro N******************************
I N*
O*
I*
T*
A*
C*
O*
L*
L*
O*
R*
T*
N*
O*
C**
9 1* ***************************<
7
/
N*
Y 1
O*
R 3
I*
A
/
T*
M 2 2 A*
M 0 1
C*
U 3 -
O*
S - 9 L*
0 7 M 5 /
N*
A 1
A*
R 0
E*
G O /
M*
O N 1
R 0
T*
6 P T S*
E D E*
G K O H*****************************
N C I
G*
I O R I*
R D E H*
O P
T I* ****************************
1 I
G 4
N N
O I
I M
T S*
I R
N*
I L
O O*
e A
P I*
l b
C E
T*
a I
3 R A*
D D
D D
D D
D D
T G
C*
N N
N N
N N
N N
O T L
I L*
O N U A L*
I D
D L*
A R I
A*
R E R V O L
I L
I A R F 4
4 4
4 4
1 2
4 T
2 2
2 2
2 2
4 2
N L Y D*
E A T L*
M T N L*
N S U O Y O I
R R C I
C 1
V S
N U
O*
E R
N*
1 0
8 7
4 4
5 0
T S
3*
4 5
3 3
5 6
6 I
I 1
1 1
1 C
S E*
AY A
D S
S N
N D
P*
ML I
B C
C C
M Z
C Y*
MA T*
AN GA I
Y*
N A*
O W*
I H*
S T T*
UGS A*
RKE P*
T/G my
- IIN
- CCI P
i ill
Table III-42 INGESTION FOOD CR0PS (CITRUS) PATHWAY ANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/k )
9 Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile
-I-131
<10
<10
<6.0
<6.0 Ba-140
<10
<10
<6.0
<6.0 Co-58
<10
<10
<6.0
<6.0 Cs-137
<10
<10
<6.0
<6.0 Cs-134
<10
<10
<6.0
<6.0 Mn-54
<10
<10
<5.3
<5.3 Zn-65
<10.5
<10.5 Co-60
<10
<10
<6.0
<6.0 68 A
INGESTION F000 CR0PS (WATERMELON) PATHWAY The State has the responsibili ty to collect a nd analyze wate rmelon samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.
Annual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the annual samples is in Table III-43.
All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There is no critical sample station in this pathway.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data is pre-sented in Table III-44.
There was no preoperational data for this pathway and all 1979 operational analyses resulted in nondetectable activity as did the 1978 operational analyses.
4 j
l 69
1 l
mo J
eo Z*
Ze O*
H*
O*
O*
J**
J*
O*
E*
H*
O**
~*****************************
b N
Z*
l w
C*
m O
M*
N H*
I N N I oa og 3 O I C*
W I &
J*
O b I o N Z*
w Z
. O W*
O O N r*
O Z w m
O H*
L H m*
W Q W*
I O x 0 I*****************************
Z u -
C*
m O E M*
2 Q W I*
O L
m H
~*****************************
e w
0 2
Z Z
O w
E F
m*
2 Z*
e J
O O*
4 L
D U
W H*
M M z Q
Q Q
Q Q
Q Q
Q O
O*
Z Z
Z Z
Z Z
Z Z
O H C*
J M
J*
O Z
- 3 4 J*
Q Q
J*
l M
m W m
> 0 J
M J
< z 1 e
e e
e e
N e
w N
N N
N N
N T
N Z J >
Q*
W < H J*
E H Z J*
I Z W 3 O > 0
~*****************************
E E O
- u W
Z 3
O*
W m
Z*
O m
N e
e e
o W
O.
e D
O O
O 4
4 w
W*
w w
O W
l i
l l
1 i
I W*
I O
W W
Z Z
O l
L*
EJ w
m o
o o
E N
U E<
H*
<Z O<
- Z
>* O Z
<* J O 3*
WaM I*
EOH H*
Exm
<* WNW 70 L*
Hmo
<OZ 34" w
4 Table III-44 INGESTION F000 CR0PS (WATERMELON) PATHWAY ANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)
Nuclide-Operational Values Mean 95 Percentile I-131
<6.0 Ba-140
<6.0 Co-58
<6.0 Cs-137
<6.0 Cs-134
<6.0 Mn-54
<5.3 Zn-65
<10.5 Co-60
<6.0 i
i, t
I l
l 71'
FOOD CHAIN (MEAT) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect a nd analyze meat samples.
There are no additional stations in this pathway.
Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual sampl es is in Table III-45.
All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There is no critical sample station in this pathway.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data l
is presented in Table III-46.
There was no~ preoperational data for this pathway and all 1979 operational analyses resulted in nondetectable activ-ity, except for Cs-137 which was detected during the first half.
The 1978 operational analysis also resulted in nondetectable activity.
S l
l l
72
Ro Ro O
N*
I* ****************************
N*
O*
I*
4 T*
A*
N C*
M O*
U L*
L O
L*
C O*
R*
E T*
E N*
S O*
C**
9 I* ****************************
7
)
/
N*
2 Y
1 O*
R 3
I*
A
/
T*
M 2 2 A*
M 0 1
C*
/
U 3 -
O*
1-S - 9 L*
0 7 M 5 /
N*
A 1
A*
R
. 0 E*
(
G O /
M*
O O N 1
2 1
R 0
T*
1 P T S*
E D E*
G K O H*****************************
N C I
G*
I O R I*
O R D E H*
S O
P C
T I
5 I
G
)
4 N
N 2
O I
1 M
T S*
1 1
R N*
L O
O*
e A
P I*
/
l b
C E
T*
1 a
I 3 R A*
U D
D D
D D
D T
G C*
N N
N N
N N
N O T O*
L I
L*
O N
(
I U A L*
O D
D L*
2 A R I
A*
1 R E R V O L
I L
I A R F T
8 9
0 7
0 2
6 0
N L Y D*
3 3
6 3
6 3
6 6
E A T L*
M T N L*
N S U O Y O I* ****************************
R R C I
C 2
V S
N U
O*
E R
N*
1 0
8 7
4 4
S 0
T S
3-4 5
3 3
5 6
4 I
I 1
1 1
1 C
S E*
AY A
O S
S N
N O
P*
ML I
D C
C C
M Z
C Y*
MA T*
AN GA Ia****************************
e N
Y*
I A*
)A W*
GH H*
KC T*
/
A*
TID aw s
P*
- EPO
- N(F G
H Table III-46 F000 CHAIN (MEAT) PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)
Nuclide Operational Values s
Mean 95 Percentile I-131
<9.5
<9.5 4
Ba-140
<9.8
<985 Co-58
<15.0
<15.0 -
<64.6
<218.1
' 15.0 Cs-134
<15.0 3
<8.0
<8.0 Zn-65
<16.5
<16.5 Co-60
<15.0
<15.0 J
74
_ _ ~. - -
F000 CHAIN (POULTRY) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze poultry samples.
There are no additional stations in this pathway.
Semiannual Gamma Analysis The-summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table 111-47.
All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There is no critical sample station in this pathway.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data is in Table III-48. There is no preoperational data for this pathway.
The 1979 operational concentrations were nondetectable as were the preoper-ational concentrations.
9 75
EC EO O
Z*
Z*
C*
i U*
Os J**
J*
C*
E*
He U**
~*****************************
N N
Z*
w C*
E O
M*
4 E N N I o
- U*
3 M I C*
W l &
J*
O b E n N Z*
w E
. O W*
O O N E*
O Z w E
O H*
A H W*
W Q W*
O % O I*****************************
Z U w C*
M O E w*
E Q W I*
O A
H e
M O
I Z
Z O
m I
H W*
E Zu e
J.
O O*
A M*
4 O
W H*
M M E Q
Q Q
Q Q
Q Q
Q O
U*
Z Z
Z Z
Z Z
Z Z
O H O*
J w J*
O 2
~ D <
Jn O
Q J*
4 E M
Z W E
> 0 J m J
~*****************************
< E W
~
W O
N O
N 4
O O J >
Q*
O O
4 M
4 M
4 4
W < H J*
E H Z J*
Z W 3 O > 0
~*****************************
E E O M
U N
l U2 Z
D O*
O m
N T
e o
O W
E Z*
M.
T C
O M
O 4
4 H
W m
.3
- w w
U W
l i
i l
I I
I W*
1 O
W W
Z Z
O A*
EJ w
m o
o o
E N
U E<
H*
<Z O<
~*****************************
Z
~<
3*
>OI I*
EEU H*
H%
<* JMQ N
A*
300
- CAO
- Awk
Table III-48
'F000 CHAIN (P0ULTRY) PATHWAY
. SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)
Nuclide Operational Values 1
Mean 95 Percentile I-131
<9.5
<9.5 i
Ba-140
<9.8
<9.8 Co-58
<15.0
<15.0 '
<9.3
<9.3 Cs-134
<15.0
<15.0 Mn-54
<8.0
<8.0 Zn-65
<16.5
<16.5 l
<15.0
<15.0 f
l I
-77
F000 CHAIN (EGGS) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze egg samples.
There are no additional stations in this pathway.
t Semiannual Gama Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-49.
All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required.
There is no critical sample station in this pathway.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data is pre-sented in Table III-50.
There was no preoperational data for this pathway and all 1979 operational analyses resulted iii nondetectable activity as did all 1978 operational analyses.
e 1
78
EC EO O
Z*
5:
H*
U*
C*
J**
J*
OS E*
H*
U**
N N
Z*
w O*
C O
M*
N H*
I N N E O a U*
3 O I C*
W I &
J*
O N I n N Z*
m
. O W*
O O N E*
O Z w m
O H*
1 H W*
W O W*
O M Q I*****************************
Z U M
O*
M O E M*
2 Q W I*
O 1
H
~*****************************
l w
O 2
Z Z
O M
I H
W*
T Z*
0 J
O O*
3 4
1
~*
m u
W H*
w
~ O E O
O C
O O
O Q
C 0
U*
Z Z
Z Z
Z Z
Z Z
O H O*
J M
J*
O Z w 3 <
J*
O Q
J*
< Z M
E W E
> O J
M J
~*************************:s***
4 E 1 O
O N
O N
O O
Z J >
Q*
O O
4 0
4 0
4 4
W < H J*
E H Z J*
Z W 3 O > 0
% % O M
U N
W Z
3 O*
W m
Z*
O m
N e
T n
O m
O W
D D
.O D
4 4
w 4*
w U
W l
l I
i i
I I
W*
I Q
m W
Z Z
O A*
EJ w
m u
U U
E N
O Z<
H*
<Z 04 Z
m
^<
3*
OI Z*
%U H*
N
<= m-c 79 m*
000
- OLO
- WwL
Table'III-50 F000 CHAIN (EGGS) PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL GAWA ANALYSIS -(pCi/kg)
Nuclide Operational Values Mean 95 Percentile I-131-(9.5
<9.5
-Ba-140
<9.8
<9.8 Co-58
<15.0
<15.0 '
<9.3
<9.3 Cs-134
<15.0
<15.0 Mn-54
<8.0
<8.0 Zn-65
<16.5
<16.5 Co-60
<15.0
<15.0 4
1 e
l 80
l l
F000 CHAIN (GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES) PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze green leafy i
vegetable samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.
Semiannual Gamma Analysis l
l The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-51. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs that were equal to or less than those required.
The critical station for this type of analysis (Sample Station C48) is in the east sector at 4.0 miles from the plant.
A statistical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table III-52.
There is no preoperational data for -this path-way.
The 1979 operational concentrations are 'ess than the 1978 operational con-centrations.
Semiannual Sr-90 Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-53. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs that were equal to or less than those required.
There is no critical station for this type of analysis.
A statistical evaluation of the opera-l tional data is presented in Table III-52.
There is no preoperational data for this pathway and the 1978 operational data showed no detectable activ-ity. The 1979 samples also showed no detectable activity.
I 81
Table III-51 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/79-12/31/79 PATHWAY I
TYPE & NO.
I LLD i
ALL LOCAT conco********************************************* IONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR G. L.
VEG (PCI/KG)
- GAMMA
- ANALYSIS 6*
- 35(
4/
5)*C48
- 44(
2/
3)*
26(
2/
2)*
(
20-62)*
(
25-62)*
(
20-32)*
TH-232 10
- 33(
5/
5)*C48
- 35(
3/
3)*
30(
2/
2)*
(
24-41)*
(
2^-
41)*
(
25-34)*
I-131 5*
2O(
2/
5)*C47
- 2O(
2/
2)*
2O(
2/
2)*
(
5-35)*
(
fi -
35)*
(
5-35)*
g BA-140 18
- ND RU-106 44
- ND CS-137 6*
351(
3/
5)*C48
- 351(
3/
3)*
ND
(66-524)*
(66-524)*
ZR-95 8*
ND n
MN-54 4
- 3(
1/
5)*C48
- 3(
1/
3)*
O(
O/
2)*
ZN-65 11
- ND l
K-40 43
- 1400(
5/
5)*C47
- 1570(
2/
2)* 1570(
2/
2)*
(
690- 1810)*
( 1490- 1650)*
( 1490- 1650)*
-Table III-52 F000 CilAIN (GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES) PATilWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg).
thsclide Operational Values Meaa 95 Percentile Control Stations Critical Stations Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Ganma Analysis Ra-225
<28.6 70.5 26.0 42.6 30.3 (88.0 Th-232 32.6 47.9 29.5 42.0 34.7
<52.9 l-131*
<8.9
<3 7. 7 20.0 f3.3
<1.5
<2.5 Ba-140
<4.6
<7.4
<3.9 (4.9
<5.1
<8.5 Ru-106
< 1 1.0
<17.7
<9.3
<10.6
<12.2
<20.5 Cs-137
<210.9
<720.1
<l.3
<1.3 350. 7 837.7 Zr-95
<l.9
<3.0
<1.8
<2.4
<2.0
<3.5 Mn-54
<l.6
<3.2
<l.0
<l.0
<l.9
<3.8 Zn-65
<2.7
<3.9
<2.6
<3.0
<2.7
<4.8 K-40 1400.0 2245.5 1570.0 1791.7 1286.7 2391.3 Strontium Analysis Sr-90
<0.6
<l.7
<0.9
<2.6
<0.4
<1.0
- Critical nuclides for critical station
Ro Ro O
N*
I*
N*
O*
I*
T*
A*
C*
O*
L**
L*
Ox -
R*
T*
N*
O*
C**
9 I* *******
7
/
N*
Y 1
O*
R 3
I*
A
/
T*
M 2 2 A*
M 0 1
C*
U 3 -
O*
S - 9 L*
0 7 M 5 /
N*
A 1
A*
R 0
E*
G O /
M*
O N 1 R
0 T*
P T S*
E D E*
G K O H********
N C I
G*
I O R I*
R D E H*
O P
T 1* *******
3 I
G
)
5 N
N 5
O I
I M
T S*
I I
R N*
L O
O*
e A
P I*
/
l b
C E
T*
2 a
I 3 R A*
T G
C*
O T O*
L I
L*
O N
(
U A L*
D I
D D
L*
L A R I
A*
L R
E. R V O L
I L
I* *******
A R F T
1 N L Y Dx E A T Lx M T N L*
N S U O Y O I
R R C I
C 4
V S
N U
O*
E R
N*
T S
0 I
I 9
C S
E*
0Y R
P*
9L S
Y*
A T*
RN SA I
N Y*
I A*
A W*
G H H*
EGC T*
VK A*
./D P*
LIO
.CO
- OPF 9
IV. EXTERNAL RADIATION The External Radiation portion of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (Specification 3.2.3) is split between the University and the State (See Table I-1).
The University also has a TLD at Sample Station C47 and the State has additional TLDs at Sample Stations C04, C40, and C46.
The summaries for the University's data is in Table IV-1 and for the State's data in Table IV-2.
Fourth quarter TLDs for Station C04 were lost during transit from Crystal River to the University.
Because of vandalism, the fourth quarter TLDs at Station C47 were lost. No other TLDs were lost dur-i ng the report period.
Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G are the criti-cal stations in this pathway.
Table IV-3 presents a statistical summary of all data.
The 1979 data from all TLD stations compares very well with the 1978 data and the preopera-tional data.
Additionally, the critical stations and the control sta'tions of the University also compare very well.
However, because the University and the State use different types of TLDs, it is necessary to report their results separately.
l l
l l
85
-Q
Table IV-1 ENVTRONMENIAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/79-12/31/79 PATHWAY l
TYPE & NO.
I LLD I
ALL LOCATIONS I HICHEST MEAN LOCATION I CONTROL LOCATION INRR oo*****************************************************************************************************
AIR SUr'TRSION *
(11REf; IR )
U OF F
- EXTERNAL 34)*C47
- 61(
3/
3)*
47(
22/
22)* O
- RADIATION 36*
15 48(
34/
(
29-73)*
(
54-68)*
(
29-73)*
0%
6 9
Table IV-2 ENVIRONMEl4TAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/79-12/31/79 PATHWAY I
TYPE & NO.
I LLD I
ALL LOCATIONS I HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION I COf4 TROL LOCATION INRR ono****************************************************************************************************
AIR SUDMERSION *
(MREN/YR)
STATE
- EXTERNAL
- RADIATION 28*
20 41(
28/
28)*C26
- S4(
4/
4)*
SEE COLUMN 4 28-59)*
(
51-59)*
9
l Table IV-3 EXTERNAL RADIATION PATHWAY QUARTERLY TLD ANALYSIS (mrem /yr) i Median Mean 95 Percentile value-Value value 77 i
Preoperational 62 All Stations 45 44.9 65.1 State 39 40.8 57.1 University ( All Stations) 47.5 48.3 69.2 University (Critical Stations) 50.5 50.9 67.2 University (Control Stations) 45.5 46.8 69.7 88 A