05000254/LER-1979-039-03, /03L-0:on 791220,while Reviewing Fuel Segment Exposures,Found 8D250-type Fuel W/Exposures Up to 30,586 Mwd/T.New Max Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate Received 791221 Showed Limits Not Exceded

/03L-0:on 791220,while Reviewing Fuel Segment Exposures,Found 8D250-type Fuel W/Exposures Up to 30,586 Mwd/T.New Max Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate Received 791221 Showed Limits Not Exceded

ML19291C459
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	01/15/1980
From:	Knoespel P COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML19291C455	List: 05000254/LER-1979-039, Forwards LER 79-039/03L-0 05000254/LER-1979-039-03, /03L-0:on 791220,while Reviewing Fuel Segment Exposures,Found 8D250-type Fuel W/Exposures Up to 30,586 Mwd/T.New Max Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate Received 791221 Showed Limits Not Exceded
References
LER-79-039-03L-02, LER-79-39-3L-2, NUDOCS 8001240454
Download: ML19291C459 (3)

LER-1979-039, /03L-0:on 791220,while Reviewing Fuel Segment Exposures,Found 8D250-type Fuel W/Exposures Up to 30,586 Mwd/T.New Max Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate Received 791221 Showed Limits Not Exceded

Event date:
Report date:
2541979039R03 - NRC Website

text

NRC FORM 366 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (7 77)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT CONTROL BLOCK. l l

l l

l l

l (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL RECulRED INFORMATION) e 6

[5Til l l l L l Q l A l D 11 l@l 0l 0l 0l -l 0l 0l Ol -l 0 l 0l 0 l@l 4 l 1 l 1 l 1 l 1 l@l l

7 8 9 LICENSEE CODE le 15 LICENSE NuveER 45 26 LICENSE TvrE JO 57 L A T $8 CON'T

$ l L @l 015 l 0l 0l 0l 2l Sl 4l@l 1l 212 l 0l 7 l 9 l@l 0 l 1 l 1 l 5 l 8 l 0 l@

o 7

8 60 61 DOCKET NUMBER tad 69 EVENT DATE 74 7b REPORT DATE BJ EVENT OESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEOuENCES h l O 12 l l On December 20, 1979, while reviewing a list of fuel seament exposures for Unit One. 1 [o ;3 ; l 8D250 type fuel with exposures up to 30,586 MWD /T were found. The highest exposure l Pi'T71 I for which a MAPLHGR limit for 8D250 fuel had becn analyzed at the times was l

o

., [

30,000 MWD /T (TS 3.5).

However, on December 21, 1979, when new MAPLHGR limits were l 10161I received from General Electric Company, it was found that the MAPLHGR limits were notl o

7 I

exceeded.

l I

0 a

80 7

8 9 SYETE M

CAUSE

CAUSE COMP.

VALVE CODE CODE SUBCODE COYPONENT CODE SU8 CODE SUBCODE lZl Zl@ J@ l Al@ l Z l Z l Z l Z l Z l Zl h l Zl @ W @

n 9

1 8

9 lu 11 12 13 18 19 2u SEQUENTI AL OCCURRENCE PEPORT REVISION sqn EVENT YE AR REPORT NO.

CODE TYPE N O.

h a(jg"o l7 9l l-l l 013191 W

l 01 31 lt

[-j W

y

_ 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 J2 AKEN A TO ON PLANT MET HOUnS S B IT FORP US.

SUPPil MAN FA T RER l X lglJ4 Zl@ ]@

l Zl@

l0l0l0]0l [@

l Nj@

l N l@

lZlZlZlZl@

JJ J5 36 31 40 41 42 43 44 47 CAUSE OESCRIPTION ANO CORRECTIVE ACTIONS h ji lo l l The cause of this occurrence was the failure to have specific MAPLHGR 1Imits for l

l l3 l l high exposure 80250 type fuel. Corrective action was for General Electric Company I

g,,,, y l to extend the MAPLHGR limit curves for 80250 fuel to 40,000 MWD /T.

At this time i

g,;3gl MAPLHGR limit analyses have been performed to exposures of 40,000 MWD /T for all l

i 4

l fuel types expected to accumulate high exposures during the present cycle 5 on Unit one.

7 8 9 80 ST US

'. POV.E R OTHER STATUS Dis O R DISCOVEHY DESCRIPTION NA l

D g l F l@ l 0[ 2 0lgl l

External Source l

A IIVITY CONTENT DELEASED O* RELEASE AVOUNT OF ACTlViry LOC ATION OP nE LE ASE J @ l Zl@l NA l

l NA l

i r,

7 d 9 i3 11 44 45 80 PERsONNEt E =eosunES y l 0 ] 0 l 0 lhl TYPE @lCESCR6PTION NUMBER Zl

'{

l NA PE RsON.E t iN;u' RIES DESCRiPTiONh NuveER l0l0l0l@

NA i

4 7

8 9 11 12 80 LOSS OF OR DAM AGE TO F ACILITY TYPE D E $C pip TlQN y l Zl@l NA

) J o.I n I

l t

8 9 to W

80 PUB L ICI T V NRC USE ONLY l

NA l

lll llllll lll%

g l N l@ DESCRIPTION ISSUED I

J 8 9 10 68 69 80 5 P. Knoespel 309-654-2241 ext. 189 {

NAME OF PREPARER PHONE:

l.

LER NUMBER:

LER/R0 79-39/03L-0 II.

LICENSEE NAME: Commonwealth Edison Company Quad-Cities Nuclear Power Station Ill.

FACILITY NAME: Unit One IV.

DOCKET NUMBER: 050-254 V.

EVENT DESCRIPTION

A concern was identified at Commonwealth Edison's Nuclear Fuel Services Department shortly af ter Unit One Cycle Five startup that fuel segment exposures for certain fuel types were approaching the highest value for which a limit for Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR) had been determined. A request was made of General Electric Company to perform high exposure MAPLHGR limit analyses for the fuel types which were expected to exceed the previously analyzed exposure range before the end of Cycle Five.

initially, the major emphasis was placed on developing high exposure limit values for the 7D230 fuel type, since at the time, exposures for this type most closely approached the highest previously analyzed exposure. The analysis results for 7D230 type fuel were received on October 12, 1979, and the new MAPLHGR limit curves were entered into the Station process computer. At the same time it was decided to also enter reduced MAPLHGR limit values at the respective highest analyzed exposures for the other fuel types in both Unit One and Unit Two.

The linear extrapolation method used by the Station process computer in determining MAPLHGR limit values provides a conservative margin in the event that segment exposures reached the bound of the analyses.

On December 20, 1979, while reviewing a list of fuel segment exposures for Unit One, 8D250 type fuel with exposures as high as 30,586 MDw/T were found. The highest exposure for which a MAPLHGR limit for 80250 fuel had been analyzed was 30,000 MWD /T.

The results of the high exposure analysis for 80250 fuel were received from General Electric Company on December 21, 1979 They showed a slight reduction in the MAPLHGR limit beyond 30,000 MWD /T as compared to a linear extrapolation of the current Technical Specification limits. However, the new limits were still significantly higher than the acutal operating values calculated by the process computer.

V!.

PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES OF THE OCCURRENCE Since reduced values for the MAPLHGR limit were entered into the Station process computer before any 8D250 fuel exceeded a 30,000 MWD /T segment exposure, the values calculated by the com'puter were always at least 4.7% conservative with respect to the new analyzed limits. At the maximum segment exposure that was found (30,586 MWD /T), the computer calculated value was 5.2% conservative as,

compared to the analyzed limit.

In addition, the typical. margins 1794.218,'

between the actual operating MAPLHGR and its corresponding computer generated limit is on the order of 30% for this fuel type at full power due to its depleted condition. Thus, although 10 of the 324 8D250 type fuel bundles in Unit One Cycle Five contained fuel segments with exposures that exceeded the bounds of the original MAPLHGR limit analysis, the General Electric recommended MAPLHGR limits were never exceeded.

Vll.

CAUSE

The cause of this occurrence was the failure to have specific MAPLHGR limits provided for high exposure 8D250 fuel.

Vill.

CORRECTIVE ACTION

The analyzed MAPLHGR limit curve for 80250 type fuel in Unit One has been extended to 40,000 MWD /T.

At this time. MAPLHGR limit analyses have been performed to exposures of 40,000 MWD /T for all fuel types expected to accumulate high exposures during the present cycle on Unit One.

Similar analyses will be provided by General Electric Company for Unit Two during Cycle Five.

These actions should preclude any future event of this type.

1 7 944 l? 1 9