text
.
[N - Commonwealth Edison
' ouad Citts Nuclear Power Station I
C '-j 22710 206 Avenue North
. \\'O
/ Cordova, Ilknois 61242 9740 i
Telephone 309/654 2241 RLB-90-011 i
l January 8, 1990 l
i U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-
Reference:
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Docket Number 50-254, OPR-29, Unit One Enclosed is Licensee Event Report (LER)89-001, Revision 00, for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station.
1 1
This report is submitted as a voluntary report.
Respectfully, COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION
.b Station Manager RL8/MJB/eb Enclosure cc:
R. Stols R. Higgins.
'l INPO Records Center NRC Region III
/
9001170002 900108 h
DR ADOCK 0500 4
/
g 2534H g
1
I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
Form Rev 2.0 Facility Name (1)
Docket Number (2)
Paos f31-Duad Cities' Unit One 01 El 01 01 01 21 El 4 1
of 0 Titl'e (4) Seven Pathways Were Not Included in the Type B and C Local Leak Rate Testing Program Due to a Recent Interpretation of 10CFR50 Appendix J.
Event Date (5)
LER Number (6)
Pecort Date (7)
Other Facilities Involved (8)
Month Day Year Year Sequential
/
Revision Month Day Year Facility Names Docket Number (s)
Ouad Cities Unit 2 of $1 01 01 01 21 61 5
.11 2 01 8 Bi 9 91 0
~
0 l0 11 010 011 018 91 0 015lO!0101 l l TH!s REPORT !$ SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10CFR p
(Check one or more of the followino) fil) 4 20.402(b) 20.405(c) 50.73(a)(2)(iv) 73.71(b)
POWER 20.405(a)(1)(1) 50.36(c)(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v)
, 73.71(c)
LEVEL 0l9lE 20.405(a)(1)(ii) 50.36(c)(2)
St. 73(a)(2)(vii)
.L Other (Specify (101 20.405(a)(1)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v111)(A) in Abstract
//////////////////////////
20.405(a)(1)(iv) 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) below and in
//////////////////////////
20.405(a)(1)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(111) 50.73(a)(2)(x)
Text)
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
Name TELEPHONE NUMBER ARIA CODE Jay Rolfes. Technical Staff. Extension 2160 3 10 l9 61 El 41 -l 21 21 41 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COM N FAILURE DESCRIBE 0 IN THIS REPORT (13)
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC-REPORTABLE
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC-REPORTABL,E TURER TO NPRDS TURER TO NPRDS I
I I I I I I l
l 1 l l l 1 I
I I I I I I l
l I I I I I SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED f14)
Expected Month I Day I Year Submission lyes flf ves. comolete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE)
X l N0 l
l l
ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces. i.e. approximately fif teen sinale-space typewritten lines) (16)
ABSTRACT:
On December 8, 1989, at 1130 hours0.0131 days <br />0.314 hours <br />0.00187 weeks <br />4.29965e-4 months <br />, Unit One was at 957. rated core thermal power.
A study to improve the Type B and C Local Leak Rate Testing (LLRT) Program at Quad Cities Station concluded that seven pathways should be added to the LLRT Program.
These test volumes included:
The Reactor Building Closed Cooling (RBCCW) inlet / outlet; the Core Spray Discharge lines; the Instrument Air to the Drywell; the Service Air to the Drywell; the Standby Liquid Control System; the Clean Demineralized Nater to the Drywell; and the Drywell Air Sampling lines.
These pathways were excluded from the Station's LLRT Program due-to an interpretation of 10CFR50 Appendix J which did not consider these test volumes applicable to the Type C testing requirements.
Due to a recent interpretation of 10CFR50 Appendix J with respect to licensing design criteria, these volumes shall be added to the Station's Type B and C LLRT program.
Modification of the systems will be performed as necessary to install the required vents and test taps to perform the Type C testing.
This report is being submitted as a voluntary report.
2530H i
)
W ENSEE EVENT REPORT fLER) TEXT CONTINUATION Form Rev 2.0 FAc!LITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER f6)
Pane (1)
/j/j/j/
/
sequential Year
/j/,/
/. Revision j/
/
Number
/
Number
_8uad Cities Unit One 0I$ l 0 l 0 1. 0 l l l 910 Ol0l1 0 l0 012 0F Of $
TEXT Energy Industry Identification system (Ells) codes are identified in the text.as (XX)
I l
PLANT AND SYSTEM-IDENTIFICATION:
General Electric - Boiling Water Reactor - 2511 MWt rated core thermal power.
EVENT IDENTIFICATION:
Seven Pathways Were Not Included in the Type B and C Local Leak Rate Testing Program Due to a Recent Interpretation of 10CFR50 Appendix J.
A.
CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ~ EVENT:
l Unit: One Event Date:
December 8, 1989 Event Time:
1130 Reactor Mode:
4 Mode Name:
Run Power Level:
95%.
This report was initiated by Deviation Report D-4-1-90-002 RUN Mode (4) - In this position the reactor system pressure is at or above 825 psig, and the reactor protection system is energized, with APRM protection and RBM interlocks in service (excluding the 15% high flux scram).
1 B.
DESCRIPTION OF EVENT
On December 8, 1989, at 1130 hours0.0131 days <br />0.314 hours <br />0.00187 weeks <br />4.29965e-4 months <br />, with Unit One at 95% rated core thermal power, seven pathways were identified that should be added to the Quad Cities Station Type
~
B and C Local Leak Rate Testing (LLRT) program.
The Commonwealth Edison (CECO) i Station Support Services staff was compiling a study cF primary containment-[NH]
penetrations [ PEN] and associated isolation valves (ISV).
This study involved the compilation of 10CFR50 Appendix J commitments and station policies in order to document the testing requirements and the technical and regulatory basis for these 4
requirements for each primary containment penetration.
This was done to improve the Type B and C LLRT program for the station.
A list of all the penetrations.
which require Type B and C testing requirements was compiled,-based on the latest interpretation of 10CFR50 Appendix J, and was compared to the penetrations currently included in the Quad Cities Type B and C LLRT program.
The'following is a list of pathways which were not included in-the station's Type B and C LLRT program:
1.
Reactor Building Closed Cooling Water (RBCCW). Inlet / Outlet to Drywell [CC).
I 4
2.
Core Spray Discharge [BM].
3.
Instrument Air to Drywell/ Torus [LD).
l 4.
Service Air to Drywell [LF].
5.
Standby Liquid Control Discharge [BR).
6.
Clean Demineralized Water To Drywell [KC).
7.
Drywell Air Sampling (Manual Sample Station)[IL][SMV).
8s30H
}
i
i LICENSEE EVENT REPORT f LER) TEXT CONTINUATION Form Rev 2.0-FAc!LITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (3)
LER NUMBER f6)
Pane (3) j Year sequential g//
Revision
///
Number
/
Number j
_0uad Cities Unit One 01510l0 10l l I 910 0f0 l1 0 l- 0 013 0F 01 5 TEXT Energy Industry Identification system (E!!s) coces are identified in the text as Ixx1 i
None of these pathways are specifically required to be Type C tested by the Technical Specifications. Consequently, this event is not considered to be a violation of the requirements for the Quad Cities Unit One or Unit Two operating licenses. Also, the physical configurations of these ptthways have not been changed since the original construction and licensing of the plant, j
C.
APPARENT CAUSE OF EVENT:
1 This report is being submitted as a voluntary report.
This event does not meet the l
reporting criteria of 10CFR50.73, nor does it involve any component failures.
The pathways not previously included in the Type B and C LLRT program were discovered through a Commonwealth Edison self-assessment improvement program, and are being reported on a voluntary basis.
The root cause for the exclusion of these pathways from the Quad Cities Type B and C LLRT program is that Quad Cities Units One and Two were designed, constructed, and licensed prior to the publication of 10CFR50 i
Appendix J, and during the initial interpretation of 10CFR50 Appendix J, these pathways were considered exempt from Type C testing requirements.
The R8CCW system, for example, was intended to be a closed loop both inside and outside containment.
Three of its four isolation valves are motor operated valves [V) which do not have an auto isolation signal, since this system supplies cooling water for the Reactor Recirculation (RR)[AD) pumps [P] and drywell coolers [VB]((CLR). Since these valves are not required to close automatically upon receipt of a containment isolation signal, this pathway was considered not to fall under 10CFR50 Appendix J Criteria II.H.2.
The Service Air supply line to the drywell, the Clean Demineralized Water Supply to the Drywell, and the Drywell Air Sampling valves are manually closed during operation. Also, the Standby Liquid Control System is isolated by squib valves which provide a tight seal which would not be broken during a Loss of Coolant i
Accident (LOCA).
These pathways were also considered not to fall under 10CFR50, Appendix J Criteria II.H.2 or 3.
I i
The Core Spray Discharge piping is normally maintained water filled and was considered to meet 10CFR50 Appendix J criteria III.C.3.
However, since the two l
core spray loops are not cross-tied, the system cannot meet the single active l-failure test required of a qualified seal water system.
Based on recent interpretation of design and regulatory requirements, these volumes are now considered to require Type C testing, and shall be added to the Quad Cities Type B and C LLRT program.
i 0
9 2s30H I
'\\'
g LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATIMI Form Rev 2.0 FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER f6)
Pane'f3)
//
fj/j sequential Year
//,j/
Revision p//
N'M
///
Number
/
Ouad cities Unit One 0l5101010 l l l 910 OlD 11 010 014 0F 01 E j
TEXT Energy Industry Identification system (E!!s) codes are identified in the text as [xx]
D.
SAFETY ANALYSIS OF EVENT:
The RBCCH System is a water-filled system which was intended to be a closed loop.
both inside and outside of primary containment.
Isolation valves 1-3702, 3703, and 3706 are motor operated valves which do not automatically isolate during a design basis accident because the system supplies cooling water to the RR pumps and Drywell Coolers.
In its normal' configuration, the only leakage path through-this system is through the valve packing of the inboard valves, outboard valves, expansion tank, and pump seals.
The Core Spray system is normally water-filled, but since it is not cross-tied, a failure of either core spray pump could result in potential air leakage in that pump's discharge pipe.
Since each loop has its own pump, at least one loop could still maintain seal water at a pressure of 1.1 Pa., 48 psig, even if a single core spray pump failed.
The worst case leakage would then include only the loop having the worst minimum pathway leakage.
The Instrument Air Supply to the Drywell and Torus is isolated from primary containment by check valves 1-4799-155, 156, and 1-4799-158, 159.
These valves tere vented during the Type A test conducted during the recent Unit One refueling outage.
The Type A test was conducted with acceptable results.
The Service Air Supply to the Drywell is normally isolated during operating conditions by check valve 1-4699-47 and locked-closed manual-isolation valve 1-4699-46.
Since it was discovered during the recent refueling outage that-the safety related boundary for this line was originally set at the check valve, this pathway was subjected to a Type C test at that time.
The minimum pathway leakage was minimal. An analysis was performed by Sargent & Lundy which found that the line is seismically qualified from the penetration to manual-isolation valve 1-4699-46. Consequently, the safety related boundary has been extended to include this valve.
The Standby Liquid Control System is a water-filled system isolated by check valves 1-1101-15 & 16, and explosive squib valves 1-1106A & B.
The squib valves, which are normally closed, provide a tight seal, and are not expected to-allow leakage of air from primary containment in their normal configuration.
The Clean Demineralized Water Supply line is isolated from primary containment by check valve 1-4399-46 and manual gate valve 1-4399-45, which is normally closed during unit operation.
Also, inboard manual valves 1-4399-47 and 1-4399-48 are normally closed.
In its present configuration, the expected quantity of air leakage through this pathway is small.
The Drywell Air Sampling System consists of twenty-one 1/2-inch lines, each of which are isolated from primary containment by a pair of manual gate valves.
During unit operation, these valves are closed, except for brief periods when they are temporarily opened to collect particulate samples in closed sample cartridges.
The leakage through these valves is also expected to be small, when they are in their normally closed positions.
as30H-i
.-.aa
~1n 9
lll
+tfI>49
///// {o gg+3@#
IMAGE EVALUATION 8/
4;.
s 1.0 lfM En
!!$ILE
$N B&S l-l L:
l.25 1.4 1.6 4
150mm 6"
r 4 *%#
/* '4 r8'%,8 Ar/
__,ggggg
,e,_
+>A #f%
<,,v, j
WEBSTER NE YORK 14580 (716) 265-1600
%h
&g9
%@1;. @ &
O
//// \\ p % F#ff TEST TARGET (MT-3)
/
IMAGE EVALUATION
/g 9
4
\\
\\\\k///
f
/
I
+
+
1.0 l# E2 BE ti ? BM l.l
$. " M l.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 4
150mm 4
6"
%n$' h////l *'%
/A tpV4 PHOTOGRAPHIC SCIE CES CORPORATION
(,%
g#g P.O. BOX 338 WEBSTER, NEW YORK 14580 4
(716) 265 1600
K.
IIIIbo
//// x\\ 82 IMAGE EVALUATION 4
//
TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0
$ 82 Ela bE l,l ib 04 1.25 1.4 1.6
==
l 4
' 50mm 4
6"
~
b
- 4' %>7///
f::44
+6 %,s
%p 6
s4 9 'e PHOTOGRAPHIC SCIENCES CORPORATION h
770 BASKET ROAD (t
4
[
l P.O. BOX 338 g%
WEBSTER, NEW YORK 14580 4
(716) 265-1600
6 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION Form Rev 2.0 FAc!LITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER f6)
Pace f31 Year p/p/p/
/
sequential p//pp/ Revision
//
Number
///
Number
,jgad cities Unit one 0l$10 10l0l l I 9l0 01011 0 l0 015 0F 01 5 TEXT Energy Industry Identification system (E!!s) codes are identified in the text as (XXl Quad Cities Units One and Two are currently on an accelerated Type A testing schedule which requires a Type A test to be performed each operating cycle.
None of these systems have resulted in a Type A test failure in their present configurations.
However, only the Instrument Air check valves were specifically vented during these tests.
The other systems were challenged to the extent that primary containment was pressurized to Pa, and these systems did not allow excessive air leakage while the associated isolation valves were in their normal positions and all components were intact.
In addition to the Primary Containment System, the Secondary Containmant [NG)
System and the Standby Gas Treatment System [BH] were available to reduce the possibility or the consequences of a postulated accident in the event that any air leakage did occur from the Primary Containment atmosphere.
E.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
The Quad Cities Type B and C LLRT program will be revised to include these seven pathways (NTS 2542009000201).
Since some pathways will require the addition of test taps and/or vents to perform proper Type C tests, modification M-4-1(2)-89-166 was !nitated to install the necessary test taps.
This modification must be installed during a unit shutdown, and is scheduled for installation during the Q2R10 refueling outage on Unit Two, which will begin February 4, 1990, and during the Q1R11 refueling outage on Unit One scheduled for October of 1990 (NTS 2542009000202).
Prior to Unit Start-Up, a Type C LLRT Test will be performed on all volumes (NTS 2542009000203).
The Type A test procedure will also be revised to drain and vent these pathways where practical, since some systems are required to be operable during the Type A test (NTS 2542009000204).
f, PREVIOUS EVENTS:
None.
1 G.
COMPONENT FAILURE DATA
None.
l l
i l
l l
3s30H
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000254/LER-1990-001, :on 891208,seven Pathways Not Included in Type B & C Local Leak Rate Testing Program.Caused by Misinterpretation of 10CFR50,App J Testing Requirements.Mod of Sys to Be Performed as Necessary |
- on 891208,seven Pathways Not Included in Type B & C Local Leak Rate Testing Program.Caused by Misinterpretation of 10CFR50,App J Testing Requirements.Mod of Sys to Be Performed as Necessary
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000265/LER-1990-002, :on 900102,during Annual Water Sprinkler Sys Valve Position Insp,Discovered That Valve 2-4199-072 Not Cycled Per Tech Spec Surveillance Requirement 4.12.Caused by Procedural Deficiency.Procedure to Be Revised |
- on 900102,during Annual Water Sprinkler Sys Valve Position Insp,Discovered That Valve 2-4199-072 Not Cycled Per Tech Spec Surveillance Requirement 4.12.Caused by Procedural Deficiency.Procedure to Be Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-002-05, :on 900204,determined That Only Reactor Bldg Differential Pressure of 0.24-inch Water Vacuum Could Be Obtained,In Violation of Tech Spec Required 0.25 Inch.Caused by Testing Deficiency.Leak Paths Sealed |
- on 900204,determined That Only Reactor Bldg Differential Pressure of 0.24-inch Water Vacuum Could Be Obtained,In Violation of Tech Spec Required 0.25 Inch.Caused by Testing Deficiency.Leak Paths Sealed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000265/LER-1990-003-02, :on 900205,determined That Leakage Rate for HPCI Sys Steam Exhaust Check Valve Exceeded Tech Spec Limits.Caused by Excessive Leakage.Check Valve Replaced W/ Mission Check Valve W/Carbon Steel Springs |
- on 900205,determined That Leakage Rate for HPCI Sys Steam Exhaust Check Valve Exceeded Tech Spec Limits.Caused by Excessive Leakage.Check Valve Replaced W/ Mission Check Valve W/Carbon Steel Springs
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-003-04, :on 900213,unit Diesel Generator Tripped on Overspeed Upon Manual Startup for Testing.Caused by Misadjustment of Diesel Generator Governor.Diesel Generator Equipment Reset & Governor Adjusted |
- on 900213,unit Diesel Generator Tripped on Overspeed Upon Manual Startup for Testing.Caused by Misadjustment of Diesel Generator Governor.Diesel Generator Equipment Reset & Governor Adjusted
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000265/LER-1990-004-03, :on 900213,loss of Emergency Bus 23-1 Occurred Due to Shorted Conductor Cable While Performing Wiring Verification.Caused by Personnel Error & Improper Installation.Electric Power Supplies Recovered |
- on 900213,loss of Emergency Bus 23-1 Occurred Due to Shorted Conductor Cable While Performing Wiring Verification.Caused by Personnel Error & Improper Installation.Electric Power Supplies Recovered
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(3)(v) | | 05000254/LER-1990-004-04, :on 900310,reactor Scram Occurred Due to Turbine Generator Load Mismatch.Caused by Failure of Negative Sequence Time Overcurrent Relay.Relay Repaired |
- on 900310,reactor Scram Occurred Due to Turbine Generator Load Mismatch.Caused by Failure of Negative Sequence Time Overcurrent Relay.Relay Repaired
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-005-01, :on 900313,RCIC Turbine Steam Supply motor- Operated Valve MO-1-13-1-61 Failed to Open During Quarterly Test.Caused by Dirt build-up on Operating Roller.Roller Cleaned & Contactor Functionally Tested |
- on 900313,RCIC Turbine Steam Supply motor- Operated Valve MO-1-13-1-61 Failed to Open During Quarterly Test.Caused by Dirt build-up on Operating Roller.Roller Cleaned & Contactor Functionally Tested
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(0) | | 05000254/LER-1990-006-01, :on 900313,tornado Warning for Rock Island County Received on Weather Radio.Station Entered Procedure Qoa 010-10.One Person Substained Minor Injuries & Some Site Damage Sustained.Notification to Be Evaluated |
- on 900313,tornado Warning for Rock Island County Received on Weather Radio.Station Entered Procedure Qoa 010-10.One Person Substained Minor Injuries & Some Site Damage Sustained.Notification to Be Evaluated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000265/LER-1990-006-07, :on 900508,Unit 2 RCIC Declared Inoperable Due to Unstable Operation of RCIC Pump Flow Controller.Caused by Proportional Band of Controller Being Set to Respond to Changes in Flow Too Quickly.Flow Controlled |
- on 900508,Unit 2 RCIC Declared Inoperable Due to Unstable Operation of RCIC Pump Flow Controller.Caused by Proportional Band of Controller Being Set to Respond to Changes in Flow Too Quickly.Flow Controlled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-007-01, :on 900318,ESF Actuation Occurred.Caused by Mgt Deficiency in Not Providing Sufficient Guidance for Review of Work Package After Scope Changed.New Work Package Preparation Procedures Initiated |
- on 900318,ESF Actuation Occurred.Caused by Mgt Deficiency in Not Providing Sufficient Guidance for Review of Work Package After Scope Changed.New Work Package Preparation Procedures Initiated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000254/LER-1990-008-01, :on 900321,discovered That Several Fire Zones Had Exceeded Amount of Fixed Fire Loading Stated in Exemption Requests to App R.Caused by Mgt Deficiency. Combustibles for Each Fire Zone Now Controlled |
- on 900321,discovered That Several Fire Zones Had Exceeded Amount of Fixed Fire Loading Stated in Exemption Requests to App R.Caused by Mgt Deficiency. Combustibles for Each Fire Zone Now Controlled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000265/LER-1990-009-08, :on 900915,HPCI Declared Inoperable Due to Failure of Gland Seal Hotwell Pump |
- on 900915,HPCI Declared Inoperable Due to Failure of Gland Seal Hotwell Pump
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-009-03, :on 900518,determined That Various Containment Vols Not Leak Rate Tested Due to Recent 10CFR50,App J Interpretation Re Licensing Design Criteria.Mod M4-1(2)-89-167 Initiated |
- on 900518,determined That Various Containment Vols Not Leak Rate Tested Due to Recent 10CFR50,App J Interpretation Re Licensing Design Criteria.Mod M4-1(2)-89-167 Initiated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000265/LER-1990-010-10, :on 901015,reactor Scrammed Due to Turbine Trip from Moisture Separator High Level Due to Broken Line.W/ |
- on 901015,reactor Scrammed Due to Turbine Trip from Moisture Separator High Level Due to Broken Line.W/
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-010-01, :on 900522,while Returning RWCU Sys to Svc, Nonregenerative HX High Temp Alarm Received,Challenging ESF Logic & Causing Group III Isolation.Caused by Leaking RWCU Check Valves.Work Requests Issued |
- on 900522,while Returning RWCU Sys to Svc, Nonregenerative HX High Temp Alarm Received,Challenging ESF Logic & Causing Group III Isolation.Caused by Leaking RWCU Check Valves.Work Requests Issued
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000265/LER-1990-010-03, :on 901015,reactor Scram Occurred Due to Turbine Trip from Moisture Separator High Level.Caused by Partially Blocked Drain Line on 2C Moisture Separator Level Switch.Level Switches Cleaned |
- on 901015,reactor Scram Occurred Due to Turbine Trip from Moisture Separator High Level.Caused by Partially Blocked Drain Line on 2C Moisture Separator Level Switch.Level Switches Cleaned
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000265/LER-1990-011-10, :on 901027,unit Scram from IRMs 13 & 16 high-high Signal Occurred.Caused by Personnel Inattention |
- on 901027,unit Scram from IRMs 13 & 16 high-high Signal Occurred.Caused by Personnel Inattention
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000254/LER-1990-011, :on 900611,diesel Fire Pump 1/2 a Out of Svc for Period Exceeding 7 Days Reporting Criteria,To Install New Suction Line.Caused by Required Maint Work.Repairs Completed & Pump Tested & Returned to Svc |
- on 900611,diesel Fire Pump 1/2 a Out of Svc for Period Exceeding 7 Days Reporting Criteria,To Install New Suction Line.Caused by Required Maint Work.Repairs Completed & Pump Tested & Returned to Svc
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000265/LER-1990-012-08, :on 901124,automatic Function of HPCI Pump Flow Indicating Controller (FIC) 2-2340-1 Failed Due to Unknown Causes.Hpci Declared Inoperable & Sys Outage Rept Initiated |
- on 901124,automatic Function of HPCI Pump Flow Indicating Controller (FIC) 2-2340-1 Failed Due to Unknown Causes.Hpci Declared Inoperable & Sys Outage Rept Initiated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(0) | | 05000254/LER-1990-012-02, :on 900612,control Room Ventilation Emergency Air Filtration Unit Declared Inoperable.Caused by Heater Malfunction.Work Request Initiated |
- on 900612,control Room Ventilation Emergency Air Filtration Unit Declared Inoperable.Caused by Heater Malfunction.Work Request Initiated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000265/LER-1990-013-07, :on 901214,torus Level Discovered Below Tech Spec Required Level.Caused by Procedure Deficiency.Procedure Qop 1000-18 Being Revised as Qcop 1000-18 & RCIC Procedures Will Be Revised |
- on 901214,torus Level Discovered Below Tech Spec Required Level.Caused by Procedure Deficiency.Procedure Qop 1000-18 Being Revised as Qcop 1000-18 & RCIC Procedures Will Be Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-013-01, :on 900626,annunciators on Both Units & Reactor Recirculation Loop Sample Valve Closed.Caused by Actuation of Primary Containment Isolation Valve When Lightning Struck 345 Kv Line.Valve Reopened |
- on 900626,annunciators on Both Units & Reactor Recirculation Loop Sample Valve Closed.Caused by Actuation of Primary Containment Isolation Valve When Lightning Struck 345 Kv Line.Valve Reopened
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000265/LER-1990-014-05, :on 901220,discovered That Torus Level Sightglass Left Valved in Since 901217.Caused by Personnel Error & Lack of Labeling.Training Enhanced & Event Reviewed During Weekly Safety Meeting |
- on 901220,discovered That Torus Level Sightglass Left Valved in Since 901217.Caused by Personnel Error & Lack of Labeling.Training Enhanced & Event Reviewed During Weekly Safety Meeting
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000254/LER-1990-015-01, :on 900707,Tech Spec 3.0.A Entered.Caused by Inoperability of Reactor Bldg ECCS Room Drain Line Check Valves.Station Drawings Updated & Procedures Enhanced |
- on 900707,Tech Spec 3.0.A Entered.Caused by Inoperability of Reactor Bldg ECCS Room Drain Line Check Valves.Station Drawings Updated & Procedures Enhanced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000265/LER-1990-015-05, :on 901221,two HPCI Steam Drain Lines & Supports Found Outside FSAR Allowables for Thermal & Seismic Loadings.Caused by Inadequate Original Seismic Evaluation. Addl Supports Installed |
- on 901221,two HPCI Steam Drain Lines & Supports Found Outside FSAR Allowables for Thermal & Seismic Loadings.Caused by Inadequate Original Seismic Evaluation. Addl Supports Installed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) 10 CFR 50.73(t)(2)(vii) | | 05000265/LER-1990-016, :on 900411,motor Control Ctr Relay 28/29-5 Setpoint Drift Occurred,Resulting in Analyzed Plant Condition.Caused by Utilizing Wrong Relay & Inadequate Review of GE Svc Info Ltr.Relay Replaced |
- on 900411,motor Control Ctr Relay 28/29-5 Setpoint Drift Occurred,Resulting in Analyzed Plant Condition.Caused by Utilizing Wrong Relay & Inadequate Review of GE Svc Info Ltr.Relay Replaced
| | | 05000254/LER-1990-016-02, :on 900809,loss of Diesel Fire Pump 1/2A Due to Failure of Starting Relays Occurred.Caused by Component Failure.Relays Replaced |
- on 900809,loss of Diesel Fire Pump 1/2A Due to Failure of Starting Relays Occurred.Caused by Component Failure.Relays Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(8) | | 05000254/LER-1990-017, :on 900811,observed Excessive Leakage Through HPCI Steam Exhaust Check Valve Due to Deterioration of Seat. Caused by Gap Between Seat & Disk Along Ctr Sealing Surface of Disks.Steam Exhaust Check Valve Replaced |
- on 900811,observed Excessive Leakage Through HPCI Steam Exhaust Check Valve Due to Deterioration of Seat. Caused by Gap Between Seat & Disk Along Ctr Sealing Surface of Disks.Steam Exhaust Check Valve Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(8) | | 05000254/LER-1990-018-01, :on 900829,plant Outside Design Spec for Electrical Separation Criteria for Two Redundant Safety Sys. Caused by Inadequate Engineering Review During Leads Installation |
- on 900829,plant Outside Design Spec for Electrical Separation Criteria for Two Redundant Safety Sys. Caused by Inadequate Engineering Review During Leads Installation
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-019-01, :on 900814,missed Tech Spec Surveillance on Main Steam Radiation Monitors Due to Operator Misjudgement |
- on 900814,missed Tech Spec Surveillance on Main Steam Radiation Monitors Due to Operator Misjudgement
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-020-01, :on 900920,determined That Continuous Fire Watches Being Performed Due to Misinterpretation of Meaning of Fire Watch |
- on 900920,determined That Continuous Fire Watches Being Performed Due to Misinterpretation of Meaning of Fire Watch
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-021-01, :on 900812,residual Heat Removal Valve 1001-50 Failed to Open Due to Thermal Binding |
- on 900812,residual Heat Removal Valve 1001-50 Failed to Open Due to Thermal Binding
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-021, :on 900812,RHR Valve 1001-50 Failed to Open During Shutdown Cooling & Startup Operations.Caused by Thermal Binding of Valve & Hydraulic Lock of Valve Operator.Valve Manually Operated |
- on 900812,RHR Valve 1001-50 Failed to Open During Shutdown Cooling & Startup Operations.Caused by Thermal Binding of Valve & Hydraulic Lock of Valve Operator.Valve Manually Operated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-022, :on 900927,piping Sys Outside FSAR Compliance Caused by Computer User Input Error |
- on 900927,piping Sys Outside FSAR Compliance Caused by Computer User Input Error
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-023, :on 901031,reactor Core Isolation Cooling & Core Spray Pumps Declared Inoperable |
- on 901031,reactor Core Isolation Cooling & Core Spray Pumps Declared Inoperable
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-024, :on 901102,discovered Tech Spec Surveillance Requirement for Continuous Fire Watch Missed Due to Personnel Inattention |
- on 901102,discovered Tech Spec Surveillance Requirement for Continuous Fire Watch Missed Due to Personnel Inattention
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-025, :on 901206,ESF Group II Isolation Occurred Due to Spurious Signal from Low Level Transmitter Lt 1-263-58A. Caused by Formation of Air Pocket in Transmitter Ref Leg. Procedures for Draining Vessel Enhanced |
- on 901206,ESF Group II Isolation Occurred Due to Spurious Signal from Low Level Transmitter Lt 1-263-58A. Caused by Formation of Air Pocket in Transmitter Ref Leg. Procedures for Draining Vessel Enhanced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000254/LER-1990-027, :on 901104,Tech Spec Surveillance Improperly Performed in Economic Generating Control Due to Personnel Error |
- on 901104,Tech Spec Surveillance Improperly Performed in Economic Generating Control Due to Personnel Error
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-030, :on 901108,ABB Impell Corp Informed Util That Reactor Recirculation Piping Potentially Ouside Seismic Design Basis.Caused by Design Discrepancy During Seismic Modeling.Whip Restraints Modified |
- on 901108,ABB Impell Corp Informed Util That Reactor Recirculation Piping Potentially Ouside Seismic Design Basis.Caused by Design Discrepancy During Seismic Modeling.Whip Restraints Modified
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-031, :on 901120,while Performing HPCI Turbine Area Temp Isolation Calibr,Setpoints of All Four Temp Switches Higher than Tech Spec Limits.Cause Not Determined.Switches Will Be Replaced & Calibr |
- on 901120,while Performing HPCI Turbine Area Temp Isolation Calibr,Setpoints of All Four Temp Switches Higher than Tech Spec Limits.Cause Not Determined.Switches Will Be Replaced & Calibr
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-032, :on 901224,1/2A Diesel Fire Pump Taken out-of- Svc on 901217 & Not Returned to Svc Before Seven Day Time Allotment Expired.Caused by Mgt Deficiency.Fire Pump Successfully Tested & Returned to Svc |
- on 901224,1/2A Diesel Fire Pump Taken out-of- Svc on 901217 & Not Returned to Svc Before Seven Day Time Allotment Expired.Caused by Mgt Deficiency.Fire Pump Successfully Tested & Returned to Svc
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-033, :on 901223,standby Gas Treatment Sys Auto Started,Reactor Bldg & Control Room Ventilation Sys Isolated & drywell-to-torus Purge Fans Tripped.Caused by Blown Fuse in HVAC Isolation Logic.Fuse Replaced |
- on 901223,standby Gas Treatment Sys Auto Started,Reactor Bldg & Control Room Ventilation Sys Isolated & drywell-to-torus Purge Fans Tripped.Caused by Blown Fuse in HVAC Isolation Logic.Fuse Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-034, :on 901223,high Chlorine Concentration Caused Control Room Ventilation Manual Isolation & ESF Actuation. Caused by Instrument Error Code & Misinterpretation of Analyzer Indication.Flow Reduced |
- on 901223,high Chlorine Concentration Caused Control Room Ventilation Manual Isolation & ESF Actuation. Caused by Instrument Error Code & Misinterpretation of Analyzer Indication.Flow Reduced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000254/LER-1990-035, :on 901213,1A Core Spray Room Floor Drain Plug Removed.Caused by Personnel Error.Sf to Stay in Area & Ensure Reinstallation of Floor Drain Plug |
- on 901213,1A Core Spray Room Floor Drain Plug Removed.Caused by Personnel Error.Sf to Stay in Area & Ensure Reinstallation of Floor Drain Plug
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) |
|