Text

Annual Environ Operating Rept:Vol 2,Radiological.
	ML19261C758
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	03/31/1979
From:	; FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML19261C755	List: ML19261C754; ML19261C756; ML19261C758;
References
	NUDOCS 7904020134
	Download: ML19261C758 (100)
	v • d • e

@

Ail!4UAL ENVIRONMEi1 TAI OPERATItiG REPORT VOLUME 2 - RADIOLOGICAL 1/1/78 - 12/31/78 CRYSTAL RIVER - UNIT 3 FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-7?

DOCKET NO. 50-302 March, 1979 1309010 \M Bright ( AERVol-2) 062

TABLE OF C0 tite:4TS PAGE I Introduction 1 II Milk and Green Leafy Vegetables Census 5 III Media Other than External Radiation 6 IV External Radiation 82 i

LIST OF TABLES PAGE I-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 3 111-1 Air Inhalation Pathway - Gross Beta Analyses Summary 10 III-2 Air Inhalation Pathway - I-131 Analyses Summary 11 III-3 Air Inhalation Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 12 III-4 Air Inhalation Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 13 III-5 Air Inhalation Pathway - Sr-89 and 90 Analyses Summary 14 III-6 Precipitation Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 16 III-6a Precipitation Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 16a III-7 Precipitation Pathway - Tritium Analyses Summary 17 III-8 Sea Water Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 20 III-9 Sea Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 21 III-10 Sea Water Pathway - Sr-89 and 90 Analyses Summary 22 III-11 Sea Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Sammary 23 III-12 River Water Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 25 III-12a River Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 25a III-13 River Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Sumary 26 111-14 Ground Water Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 28 III-14a Ground Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 28a III-15 Ground Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Summary 29 III-16 Potable Water Pathway - Gamma Analyses Sumary 31 III-16a Potable Water Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 31a III-17 Potable Water Pathway - Tritium Analyses Sumary 32 ii

LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

PAGE III-18 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway - Gamma Analyses 34 Summa ry III-19 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 35 III-20 Shoreline External Sediment Pathway - Sr-90 Analyses 36 Summa ry Sea Food Chain Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 38 III-21 111-22 Sea Food Chain Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of 39 Analyses Sea Food Chain Pathway - Sr-89 and 90 Analyses Summary 40 III-23 42 III-24 Ingestion Crab Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 111-25 Ingcstion Crab Pathway - Gamma Analyses Statistical Evaluation 43 III-26 Ingestion Carnivorous Fish Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 45 III-27 Ingestion Carnivorous Fish Pathway - Gamma Analyses Statistical Evaluation 46 III-28 Ingestion Herbivorous Fish Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 48 III-29 Ingestion Herbivorous Fish Pathway - Gamma Analyses Statistical Evaluation 49 Ingestion Oysters Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 51 III-30 III-31 Ingestion Oysters Pathway - Gamma Analyses Statistical Evaluation 52 III-32 Ingestion Shrimp Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 54 III-32a Ingestion Shrimp Pathway - Semiannual Gamma Analysis 54a 111-33 Ingestion Milk Pathway - Gamma Analyses Sumary 56 111-34 Ingestion Milk Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 57 III-35 Ingestion Milk Pathway - Sr-89 and 90 Analyses Summary 58 iii

LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

PAGE Ingestion Animals Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 60 III-36 111-37 Ingestion Animals Pathway - Gamma Analyses Statistical 61 Evaluation Food Chain (Grasses) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 63 III-38 III-39 Food Chain (Grasses) Pathway - Ganana Analyses Statistical Evaluation 64 III-40 Ingestion Food Crops (Citrus) Pathway - Ganna Analyses Summa ry 66 III-40a Ingestion Food Crops (Citrus) Pathway - Annual Gamma Analysis 66a III-41 Ingestion Food Crops (Watermelon) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 68 III-41a Ingestion Food Crops (Watermelon) Pathway - Annual Gamina Analysis 68a 111-42 Food Chain (Soil) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 70 III-43 Food Chain (Soil) Pathway - Ginra Analyses Statistical Evaluation 71 III-44 Food Chain (Meat) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 73 III-44a Food Chain (Meat) Pathway - Semiannual Gamma Analysis 73a III-45 Food Chain (Poultry) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 75 III-45a Food Chain (Poultry) Pathway - Semiannual 6 sma Analysis 7Sa 111-46 Food Chain (Eggs) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 77 III-46a Food Chain (Eggs) Pathway - Semiannual Gamma Analysis 77a 111-47 Food Chain (Green Leafy Vegetables) Pathway - Gamma Analyses Summary 79 111-48 Food Chain (Green Leafy Vegetables) Pathway - Statistical Evaluation of Analyses 80 III-49 Food Chain (Green Leafy Vegetables) Pathway - Sr-90 Analyses Sumr.ary 81 iv

LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

PAGE IV-1 Air Submersion Pathway - TLD Analyses Summary (University of Florida) 83 IV-2 Air Submersion Pithway - TLD Analyses Summary (State of Florida) 84 IV-3 Air Submersion Pathway - TLD Analyses Statistical Evaluation 85 V

I. INTRODUCTION The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program provides information which can be used to assist in assessing the type and quantity of radia*; ion exposure in unrestricted areas resulting from plant operation. The Program is conducted via a contract with the University of Florida, Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Gainesville, Florida and a grant to the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Orlando, Florida. The parts of the Program for which each are responsible are listed in Table I-1. In essence, the Program provdes a continuation of the preoperation program so that any increases of radioactivity in the en-vironment can be detected. No pathway has shown any confirmed increases of radioactivity in the environment due to plant operation during this report period.

The most significant achievement in 1978 was that all but one nuclide in one pathway had an annual average LLD that was equal to or less than that required. This was the result of corrective action started in 1977; but an Enhanced Sampling Program (ESP) was also required for the gamma analyses of several pathways. The Potable Water Pathway required two additional samples subsequent to tha fourth quarterly sample in order for the average annual sample LLDs to meet the LLD requirements. The Shoreline External Sediment Pathway needed one additional sample after the second semiannual sample so that the average annual sample LLDs would meet the LLD require-ments. The Food Chain (Green Leafy Vegetable) Pathway required five addi-tional samples following the second semiannual sample to bring all annual average sample LLDs (except for I-131) to within the LLD requirements. The I-131 annual average sample LLD could not be brought to within the limits because the second semiannual sample was allowed to sit for approximately thirty days before it was cuunted. The LLD calculations,which allow for decay, gave an extremely high sample LLD as the half life of I-131 is only eight days. The average I-131 sample LLD for the five additional samples was 5.4 pCi/kg as compared to the 10 pCi/kg requirement. The annual aver-age sample LLDs of all nuclides in 1979 should be within the requirements without an Enhanced Sampling Program.

In the summary analysis tables, two terms are used which need explanation.

The term "ND" means that the activity of the nuclide for the samples was non-detectable or less than half of the LLDs for those samples. The term

"<LLD" means that the activity of the nuclide for the samples was less than the LLDs for those samples. In this way, an apparent change in activity below the lower limits of detection can be trended without getting bogged down in " actual" activity values.

The statistical evaluation of operational analyses were performed using one-half the LLD value if the activitf was non-detectable and using the LLD value if the activity was less than the LLD value. When a non-detectable or less than LLD concentration used in an evaluation, the results are pref-aced with a "<" sign to show that the results do not indicate only detected activity.

1

,' Finally, the statistical evaluation of the operational concentratioris t.h i <t there are preoperational results includes the median values. This is <lmr-solely for comparison to preoperational results.

4 4

2

Table I-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RESPONSIBILITY PA THW. .' SAMPLE STATIONS (l)

University Ai r Submersion C04, C14H*, C14M*, C14G*,

C40, C41, C43, C46 State Ai r Submersion C07, C09, C18, C26 University Air Inhalation C41*

State Air Inhalation C04, C07, C18, C26, C40, C46 State Precipitation C04, C26, C40 Un i vers i ty Sea Water C01, C09, C13, C14H, C14M, C14G*

State River Water C15 State Ground Water C40 Uni ve rsi ty Potable Water C07, C10, C18 Uni versi ty Shoreline External C01, C09, C14H*, C14M*,

Sediment C14G*

University Seafood Chain C29, C30 Uni ve rsi ty Ingestion Crab C29*, C30 University Ingestion Fish C29*, C30 (Carnivorous)

University Ingestion Fish C29 *, C30 (Herbivorous)

Universi ty Ingestion Oysters C29, C30 Uni ve rsi ty Ingestion Shrimp C27 University Ingestion Milk C47, C49*

Uni versi ty Ingestion Animals C45 University Food Chain (Grasses) COS, C40, C41 3

Table I-1 (Continued)

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RESPONSIBILITY PATHWAY SAMPLE STATIONS (l)

State Ingestion Food C19 Crops (Citrus)

State Ingestion Food C04 Crops (Watermelon)

Uni versi ty Food Chain (Soil) C04, C07, C18, C26, C40, C41, C46 State Meat C50 State Poul t ry CSI State Eggs C51 University Food Chain C47, C48*

(Vegetables)

Critical Pathway Sample Stations (1) See ETS Table 3.2-4 and Figures 3.2-2 and 3.2-3 for the description and location of all Sample Stations.

4

II. MILK AND GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLE CENSUS Environmental Technical Specification 3.2.1 requires a census of animals producing milk for human consumption to De conducted semiannually. If this census fails to locate any such animals, a census of gardens producing fresh leafy vegetables for human consumption is required annually.

The garden census, required as the result of a lack of findings on the December 12, 1977, milk animal census, was completed on March 3,1978. The critical garden (Sample Station C48) was found to be in the east sector at 4.5 miles from the plant.

A semiannual milk cow survey was completed on June 5, 1978 again with no milk animals found. The critical station for green leafy vegetables was continued at the garden 4.5 miles from the plant in the east sector.

A seminannual milk cow census was started in December,1978 but was not completed within the period of this report.

5

III. MEDIA OTHER THAN EXTERNAL RADIATION Environrnental Technical Specification 3.2.2 requires that samples be taken and analyzed per ETS Table 3.2-2 and that analysis LLDs will be equal to or less than those in ETS Table 3.2-5A and B. Each analysis routine of each pathway in ETS Table 3.2-2 will be surrmarized, interpreted, and evaluated in the order presented.

6

AIR I!iHALATIO:4 PATHWAY The Air Inhalation Pathway is one of two pathways split between the Univer-sity and the State. In addition to the assigned stations, the University operates a station at C47.

Weekly Gross Beta Analysis The sumary for the gross beta analysis is in Table III-1. Two weekly samples were not collected and analyzed:

C07 for the week of 06-18-78 because of a loose hose C41 for the week of 03-03-78 because of loss in the U.S. Mail All other samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required.

There are no critical stations for this type of analysis. A statisticai evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-4 The operational concentrations are similar to the preoperational concentra-tions and are lower than the 1977 operational concentrations. The 1977 concentrations were artificially elevated due to the Chinese weapons tests and the concentrations returned to preoperational levels.

Weekly I-131 Analysis The summary for the iodine analysis is in Table III-2. Because of the loss in the U.S. Mail, the sample from Station C41 for the week of 03-03-78 was not collected and analyzed. All other samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required. Station C41 is the critical station for this type of analysis and no samples had activity greater than 10 times the control station's 95 percentile values.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table III-4. There is no preoperational data.

The statistical analysis of the critical and control stations for the per-iod of this report is as follows:

Critical Station Mean Value = <.020 pCi/m 3 Critical Station 95 Percentile Value = <.073 pCi/m 3 Control Stations Mean Value = <.020 pCi/m3 Control Stations 95 Percentile Value = <.027 pCi/M 3 As with the gross beta concentrations, the Iodine-131 concentrations in 1978 were lower than the 1977 concentrations and probably approached the preoperational concentrations. The critical station and control station concentrations are less than their respective 1977 concentrations. Even though all samples at the critical station resulted in non detectable activity, the 95 percentile concentration appears high because of LLD dif-ferences in the two contractors collecting the data.

7

Quarterly Ganma Analysis The summary for gamma analysis of quarterly composites is in Table 111-3.

All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There are no critical stations for this type of analysis.

The statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-4 The concentrations of the nuclides, as determined by gamma analysis are similar to the preoperational and the 1977 operational concentrations. The only exceptions are Zr-95 and K-40 whose concentrations returned to preoperational levels after being elevated during 1977.

8

Quarterly Sr-39 and 90 Analysis The summary for the Strontium analysis of quarterly composites is in Table 111-5. All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There are no critical stations for this type of analysis.

A statistical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table 111-4 There is no preoperacional data.

The strontium-89 concentrations in 1973 were lower than the 1977 concentrations while the strontium-90 concentrations were similar during both years.

9

e.,

.4

+

$ f W h $

e b

s M

M L

~ +

W

.* = f .

I ._

8'*i/ da

'e.W m' M

4 ,J

~4 I i

- y )

\

v , .,

e. .ad I

" # .4 L,,\ \ ', I w g ,[ \ $5

'-= *;+q (,f{ i(

.a , r' 3' '). /l*\p.;\. '

k ,

' I '

\\i O .k

- A e 4 f5 MM g ~ r

, -, ' .s ag J &

" ** 3u J t e-o

.f -7 -e aX 17 1 ^N l** J n

c. ,e' *r 3 LJ m )

' I i ';O

, 2 a z r. -

a ,"

.- 4 a..

eed -

m 4-e e

y

.J, PO

P

~ ~ ,

h &

.= _

A 4 _4

'r*

e-

.b w e eg 3-e *

, '{ 14 J <)

M d.$

i g k $

.- k 'I ~)

M -- -= , . 4 , ,

O m -.

.-4

=,e

.,g m e 5 / WW

~

a 8 , +,4

- ) .'

p. -

M , +

+-

~.h e-

~

d

'g O

.e w

-J o em end e'.

. *d 'edr' '#

m %

-e-e f.

s m ,, .

J we & m4 e . g v.e. .s

% a 7 f 'w s '1 , ** 4 .s . J s

. e

% ' ens M

.se f

-- d M "

4.

-e .m

-ad #

a

-e %

or og A

'- e em e end J

= m Jj a

9 e.

Lar e i J +! t

. sn

~ 4 m

.)

~ i C4 s

~

j I

I

' +

L . -

A

-A a-e.dr*

. M a e 4 he (

% .M e.e

r

-.* se

& m Y .j

'{ Y ***

1

y. .- 10 y v-M J

A 8

O E e,

9 m

M l e

re W s "

M 4 I --

M d E

~

e s ..e A 4

--e J

e-d

-- . . - . . s

%2 .~ ~

% =%

-me g b q p A gt .

d G h e

'e'm' g . $'

T g

,w ,'}' 3 J

s J *

~

< r.\

s

,\.\.,- -

\ .%

3 ~, ,

, L '\

\,t

- ~ -

- 1 , \g? '( i s.gem .

('.-) ,.

ss ~_ g-i. .s

, 0, ; i . 1' 3

4 t, pg

',- \g

'V t , sb,

~f u

_ 3 e

a am$

em e e e.,

.e en mm

.M -

e e.@

-.o 4 m

mm W J +a e ano e-

. . & a 4 %

H *

- e

, - e.

-e . -

M

~

M e

4 3 -= , _

m -

>- ?.. .- ,

m N

-M p g w % m

. J

-g e P

-=- m

= w

" _ == - 2

-~ ~

m e

e

,d e +

e e m.e O

8 HE **

e M

~

l em Deuf

.. f _A w

,'48 M

& L 3

+

w d

. -e

> g

%6 a

w +4 7

aee e-en 4 a

'M S

~

w e

,. 1 +1

T4

~. 4 a-. .-

-.** w e ..,,w .** ,e * <,,+4 ., . w ,e . * * ,, . . . . . * * . . 4 . . w, .w . . -

+

r, 4

- .c * * -1 *

.* 1 .?

=-e, >

p ,, -,

-= = ==

L. 4 .- ..

-=

, .=

~4

- D . . - - - -

" , **

5 N : 2 4 a

- ?.

L V L L U V W C4

- * .. ~ l., . 6 . -

-# . . a .. ~. -

n f f C G* ? u~ se t,: e V*

4 0 -44 e

e *

s. 4 4, t eeg o***= 0 s4 4 s uw s, C- w*

t *

e er ee t + + e *ws

. 4 - - a a . -

N 26 C O C O Q (. O

> ~ C6

< N **

r

c, .- d

- c .- m S N N N N N N N

l '

r. n -

O o e 0 1 1 4 J#

e' N *

, N 7*

c e Q

w

... w w w w

- - g o n -

es q ,)

-' 7 + ri O < ) r' O O

^1 O m-

c; v: n

a O C

_ H ** e e e e o e e

, _ _o O O r O O

., C C+4 5 644 * *+4 + w i: w w w w .,

4, t 4w M 4 % i ee+4 # +4 5 ,, =r er e *> 4 - 4 Se #

.* u -. <'s

",,,' ** e C,

e w . *

-# *< eew e# -e 4 e w+ 45 + + 44 e****4W e4 4 eoe4 ee4

e+oe***4+ 1

w o -s o. *.m om em m e n ==

r1 2 . 4 sI *,T *P N3 %, .? .r' *- ^.

I C 4 / I f* * r3 ! O *) ,-* O **',* 1*-

~

r=

~

t.* 4 ^

,, O O r Q n n

. 7e e e e e e e e

. C* O > C o O j r3 CJ #f ". *** NI NI N1 Nt NI N I Nf

- L ... >- 4 'C T c. : e. It- r- f "'<.

4 -. . O <* I c c c e o o r3 -

c -.

C L ** O O O 2 2 C O C

~*

Z

- - e. . . e . e e .

.) "

_.4* O 3 0 c) C: o :-

y . 4 ww ,w ww ,w ww ww ww 8#

=* 3 a6 7 4 *J ? e N T

'. C, a+ ~* * <> 0 O

<3 e

< . = <e O m 0 o O A

.I ~ "l'

e e e e e e e

> 3

s O e O O O O e

== ., -w 4: # #** bw eo# **C w w * *4 w e. w e .e,e 4 w ,e e e + w,ce,w,a h 44 , *

+4., a w 4, 4,

- ,, 4 q -

W O & , . .iq r M

> r

n ^

J . Os <- O ry O o o n

< - + e e e e e e . . e e

- ** 2

J O O O C O r,e e-O f.

u t.

~

C C >-* C -d w C + 4 tr #

C 1. e# 4 s, Gu < k er (r & 4 ee4& 4 4 4 44*g e w+ 4, 4r g4 +4 4 +

2 L ,, T

= w se = .

> i. '

e4 .*

e.e es I y

,, 4 an.

% g,

* < > - < **

9 4 C 9 f ? f C

== Jw Z J '- o' c. .* -a -= y 7 *

+

w

I I I I i i i i 4, 4 4* ",'

t*

- l-s.

e t

.-. r 4 '# b* Q [ *" *"

[ q N *-

%g

>+ * I

ns = <T w '" 2 2

a'w

-< 4w * *ew e o c-

4r , e + ,**i, 4< 44.

aeu 's 4r 3 <> ***.+3. * < - 6 ew >

d

2 -

h ur **

g b.md pM 'I I k Gi \ g

.]

". a !~ '3/, -N!, t1

.*'r.j I: f. 'Ii h' ; i ' I li l. !j, 'l l'.!Ig I

h. i b=, <

i s u m

._ g , ij (i . 84g

,Q se]s 1, 3

e. ; 12 E <

Table 111-4 AIR INiiALATION PATH', JAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF AflALYSLS (pCi/m3)

Nuclide Preoperatior;al Val ues 02 erational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gross Beta Analysis Gross s .029 .12 .044 .059 .153 Iodine Analysis 1-131* -- -- --

<.020 <.033 Gamma Analysis Ce-144 .003 .172 <.030 <.051 <.165 Ra-226 <.2 .241 <.020 <.016 <.030 Th-232 <.01 .008 <.010 <.008 <.01S I-131 <.07 .004 <.005 <.004 <.008 Ita-140 <.01 .016 <.005 <.004 <.007 Ru-106 .025 .216 <.025 <.021 <.036 Cs-137 (.01 .013 <.005 <.004 <.007 Zr-95 .003 .043 <.005 <.005 <.011 Mn-54 <.01 <.01 <.005 <.004 <.008 Zn-65 <.01 <.01 <.010 <.008 <.016 K-40 <16.8 <16.8 <.055 <.055 <.122 Strontium Analysis Sr-09 -- -- --

<.001 <.002 Sr-90 -- -- --

<.004 <.008

Critical nuclide for critical station 13

9 mee 9

1 .

_m.

M O

- 4 M

g hC _a o ~s~e 4=m emm en-m d d M emip eens W W M

- ,#' s W

me .ed

-

a ..

g

~-o 0 0

%=

W

,g "O S e $ an @ 4WD e e @

4 m a a gs 4

_"a '-@

W

=

ao

" M *A y J

==4 d

m_

% , d w . .

-m .

O 4% M M

%M .

me my me_

H .mmg 4 /

< + ,

. M s

+g

m 4 h er

t

' = ar m#

am w

- em 4 -w' -

% e

- 4 L v

.e A = -m o90 er '4#

,,,,

1

= %

.ma M 4 g /

% m en und -es uw w A W W hamme g M e em

- mg D

^

_4 d=d'O e 9nVB4

= ** 4 a ~ ~ ar. , m, m 4 m Mm M

.% _m m ,%

-e = w i W =>4

-- m e %

M ~

w .a '

- m- W M

a.m g

m e=W -eM" 'M w

.., i m,amm w g *EW M

-* re er M eslG om, [b = .-

d W 4

ease ' a#

M.

m emP w# *# W we 4 m' W e nb , _

h 6 M g * .

- _up E

de 4e '# w

< "- .f "e*

m a-o D a, er av w

"'IE *W ens u a em M

h Ana =he s s e

'*9 se e H J m

M-4 ep *eme- e.= -us

" k

- e . +

me a==.

^*e ,

' D a w

,* y * + -m -

Y

+ b '#'

e A -

4 %

ay e,"J b em of

%--=*

- h g

w M

e M

4 O

M -. .-e

= - e- ad h ema e

as 09 &

9 i

M .

g e's . aeme.

e

== 1 'd A 7 ., J Y L

M m=

mel b w 9*'**,

m

%_ elme.

O ,

-.e- y 8 .

a'ad W

+m OW ~d M %w meb.W j men M

e=

1

PRECIPITATION PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze precipitation samples. There are no additional stations for the pathway.

Monthly Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the monthly samples is in Table III-6. All monthly samples except Station C40 for November were col-lected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required.

There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-6a. No operational sample had any detectable activ-ity and the preoperational analyses also had no detectable activity.

The 1978 operational activity of the nuclides determined by ganta analysis are non detectable as were the preoperational and 1977 operational concentrations.

Monthly Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of the monthly precipitation sample is in Table III-7. Due to insufficient rainfall, the sample for Station C40 in November could not be collected. All other samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-6a.

The 1978 operational activity of tritium was non detectable as was the preoperational and 1977 operational activities.

15

em em *"

w M

e p J T T L 1 ) - A 4 e

=s

[

d muuW

A f

med M

h u.

mb

A 9T

-e

e

=

m . . .

O

- % 4 A = e 4 e .m,e 9 4 W -am e. =-e. M 9 "R. dA. '4 A 4 M M O s

\ k to w M

,, M &

- )

=

w %" 9,. \.

e==e m

,\

- s r

-m a,a hi# M

{

i

@'ma $

- =m * ' I

~

-6 r

, z.'

) r

' \

e. f

.'i

\

.- * (,

6k.

- i mm.d

.k ** b +- k Y he4 ]

e *

4 W

==

4 OJ - ee s ,

4 e= ** . . , ,. . . . e e ~ , -

M d

co ;

p e_ - -

se

m. e 4., e m ~ m e a

, 'g

e, e., sm-e ee

- =w= - ey me -- -

-u e e W e ee m N u

epuiW O

mer aim M

- W

= -

em's M we m %

4mm use e w

** d umio + g e e e o4 au-D=== A m 4 -J M 49 M M w e. W w

m eS

. and "5

d A

- - e 4

O o

me 4as.e d -

o,4

- m -

O O ,Y9 -gim

. -. ,- - - M me wp N e a s . ..e m . m

e# a m /

-im

. mf

= 1 1 , (

1 . ~ 1 m.d

-e e

W M

=

m em e l M w

ee W h

'a

Table III-6a PRECIPITATION PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/t)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysis I-131 <.4 <4 <8.5 <8.5 <8.5 Ba-140 <10 <10 (8.5 <8.5 <8.5 Cs-137 <10 <10 <8.5 <8.5 <8.5 Cs-134 <10 <10 <8.5 <8.5 <S.5 Co-58 <10 <10 <8.5 <8.5 <8.5 Mn-54 <10 <10 <7.5 <7.5 < 7. 5 Zn-65 <20 <20 <15.0 <15.0 <15.0 Co-60 <10 <10 <8.5 <8.5 < 8. 5 Tritium Analysis H-3 <320 <320 <100 <100 <100 16a

h p'

4

ee e d-5

-e w A mM \

m fw m

W 4 W

1 4

mm Waf A em m $.

w L M d Wm 4

M =e y s a - p A e sa N

M. h M M m"Y M =

f

\

eA =9 (

4_m_

Je 4 b y

,J W 9 ^

f boau

l M M .=d *

% ~

4 6 N 4

s

-eum ee g e a d de m

M

Q elme m

W e4 +J

- ee

-N W ,a, I 4==

-e m- O e4 h em 4 m O

== = . 4 mui4

-e -**

g m W

M - -

an=4 M -

=

%J em F- -

2 a

d H W W e

mm8 e.

W h em uiW8 w #.

a#

64 g

(

%e**e mm oo =s db &

meg a=

4 -

v

% e h k

no

m e &

4 e &

T

+4

..o w

-9 J &

w won e

-*i'$

=

we =% e h M N

W m. h

== 4

- 4 O e $4 o'""

w*

D*

- e4 4*

O m e-N 6 h

m

>m ag

a 1

A e

e 1

=

- eme 6 - ed

= *{ e y P"*

S .g #

m .e4 -

g ,e g 5

-. .e L/

s

SEA WATER PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze sea water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Monthly Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of monthly samples is in Table III-8.

All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had annual average LLDs equal to or less than those required. Sample Station C14G is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value. A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-9.

The concentrations of nuclides by gamma analysis during 1978 was less than the concentrations during 1977 and similar to the preoperational concentrations. The critical stations and the control stations concentration were almost identical and both were less than the respective concentrations during 1977.

Quarterly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The surrmary for the Sr-89 and 90 analysis of quarterly composites is in Table 111-10. All quarterly ccmposites were collected and analyzed and all LLDs were equal to or less than those required. There are no critical sta-tions for this type of analysis.

There were no reported preoperat'ional results and a statistical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table III-9.

The 1978 operational concentrations are similar to the 1977 operational concentrations and probably are close to preoperational levels.

18

Quarterly Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of quarterly composites is in Table III-11. All quarterly composites were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs that were equal to or less than those required. There are no critical stations for this type of analysis.

A carparison of the preoperational and operational analyses in Table III-9.

The operational concentrations in 1978 were less than those in 1977 but did not approach preoperational levels. Some preoperational activities that were reported were less than the minimal detectable activities and this skewed the statistics downward.

19

44

- 4 b d e 4 m p e

= % mn em ,o m. % e e. == - m. s em

e *,

e e -

4e sea.

a,,-

-fm

- . s .s - * <

% .% -A d A $ d d O 4 E en A N 9 N

- +

-We.^

h % s

- , . ,h, . -N ,. ...

W -# .e 4 =

I _ 1.'e8

-d t*G

,, 1 d v sy- e egr Env -- w w W W "W # 'M 'u.# 'w wr-

=. # ,

.s 2,< -

W I

e

.i) ** A e a em e e e d h ,E e e N a4 p -4 e g E w ep e $ e -e 4e 44 *I * *

4 % *E

g , m .% m a m .s a m =% ,% + %

, , . = p, = = = =

7--

\ g - ,m, d J -9 a 4 4= #

a *=0 . 1 +.se [ mi W e-4 c.4 W m fue rue c=1

. n -

- r -

en \ " b

~

g b+ J a 'e M * %. \

-; _., j - - - -

9m m 6 w

% b

- n, m- a ,,s v J -

m

- *emi m k F M "4

, q e4 4 4

._ = . t,

"

e me -<e- e.

, W p4 W

' , .4 - -

as.g 9

N - 6 M M

= * = # . . #

g - - - - .- - - . - _ - . . - - u . . ; N _ _ _ _ . . . 4 N _

, , - , ~ . ~ ~ ~ n . .., , . .,

- " 6 e = e N4 m % % 4 g Pd g g **

f m

- ~ ._

a m _

~

, -. ~

s M M wee w W 'W W * 'M e 'O'e- W e,Y %* %qt e a, 4

-~ - -.

- c .

s' : .

6 wee w .

m

%g a v 9,'

m 6 =

s

_a ,,,,,,

*

1m =

w * % A .m . = ., .g . , . , ,

. A I

% c g ,

a %

+* M as, _d

_'~ 1 * -

s -

s e e .h et W 4 ne n e s +

oo & ^ S \ _

- .~ .

w &

y a ad W . w w =

'- , = -4 N m' se eg 8"D

4 e e .e,.

e a.e ao e a m . . ) (

9 4

h v %

- M h

-=_. 1

-e 90 '..\

~

20 ci.uW. ) , , l .i ;Wr i \ \,

, , s-.

_ f _ sen i 3,2 , i 1 diSWg i-\

.- . ~

(G){\{a.;&qU n,,i-U N' '\

u.ab s u\ \cy\ \ '.\gf1 i[.,,i i Q' ,A

Table 111-9 SEA WATER PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUA'10N OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values _

Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Control Stations Critical Stations Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Ganma Analysis Ra-226 --

600 <30.5 <34.9 < 7 7.6 (34.4 <79.5 (37.1 <66.4 Th-232 --

7 <18.5 <18.2 <32.9 <17.6 <31.6 <20.8 (38.8 I-131* <.4 <.4 <4.5 <4.9 <9.6 <4.9 <9.9 <4.5 (8.2 Ba-140 <10 11 (14.5 <14.4 <24.3 <14.4 <24.5 <14.3 <23.7 Ru-106 -- --

<33.5 (30.9 <49.9 <30.9 <50.4 <31.2 (48.2 Cs- 137 * <10 10 <4.5 (4.0 <6.4 <4.0 <6.5 <4.0 <5.9 Z r-95 <10 <10 <6.5 < 5. 9 <10.1 < 5. 9 <10.2 <6.2 <10.0 D? Cs-134* <10 <10 <4.0 <4.1 < 7. 6 (4.1 <7.9 (4.0 <6.0 Mn-54 <10 <10 <3.5 <3.4 < 5. 8 <3.4 <5.9 <3.5 < 5. 4 Zn-65 <20 7 <7.5 <7.2 <11.7 <7.2 <11.8 <7.3 <10.8 K-40 150.8 368.7 <249.5 <232.4 <410.1 <221.0 <405.4 (289.8 <358.7 Strontium Analys_is Sr-89 -- -- --

<2.4 <10.7 -- -- -- --

Sr-90 -- -- --

< 0. 5 <1.7 -- -- -- --

Tritium Analysis H-3 71 87 <349.5 <359.4 (623.3 -- -- -- --

Critical nuclides fnr critical station.

O

, 4 s 5

-o b d gm

7 4 7 I

3 s 6 A E J

-e E

-se M $

~ ,

.Y

= e r**

_ae, -w W M --

d M w

..g 4 d a J ;

'<0 ,

_e e.8 0

h c,

a - 44

A s 4 A y ~. J e b J % .e am x ~+ ,3

+ * ,.,, ,T . I ,

.b

_ n - /

.)

i As.g

$ M *

', N 6 2

-* -+

i

,-c w,

b M. J _ A m

%i w g

M s ~ s s d

e =

N E8

_ P

- ~

.M"G.

w Gm M m,

--w. ..

- . ae

' -e

,- em

~

M M O. . .

-e -. . _ _ , .

! 'l e , -

W ~ . . -

M

~

tie.4 g'

~

@ ~. .

.* a

- 7 H . 1 1 [ * **

S. g 4

A

~

-s ., ..,

WO e w O 4 -g 3

a 4 ==

1 Y

4 a -

+ e g =

e. e *

5

+ M

._ .J

.. oO 4 k .

p r - J e

- 5

=

4e-o -.- m b M k.u.8 "

,p h e

} $ 'W s#

-4 a 4 M ..aV 1+ ? _. ~

' ,1 .

- a

""*A [

r 4 e%

- 'N A .5 N W W C *$ $ 7 4

L

'I 4

U J.-

3 2

'L w 2 .4 -

e. - _ . .

- %" w s, '

22 4.

.ms8 -

v

e 6

= .m~

simum o I Y w

M M

4 s

@ L)

- A f"

g

'h N

J.

9 M &

^'

,a O '4 JJ _

n

-a y

e seama A me aw

.m. $

w' 14 g 9 0

-. .- - ; 2 2 aa .

~ a -

"b"F 4 '

am v=4 et z -) --. .

'g<- **'" A l *

~- e

=4 e

m ed

e =+

me em de epus a.m -a M w A

m 6 6

6 4 %

- mh amme .e

,4 m -

4 m@ ed m me e e M 4 sen= &

.a --

e e . . . -

t . ~ ,

== , -

M W d

~

f - =.

Q a -

m s g -

_ s

,e m &

_ = *ew emild d e m M

=m -e e

e --

-99 ea , , .(

e. -

e N e m.4 'M em m -W

~ w

--- en e.w w d dud e M

-9 -

w me

+-

be -e %e

-en M M

~

tamuiu 4 $

W M e-*

m-se -

~

4, N " k I J

4

'A

.in M

wim=*

m ee. y' N ,

J 4 N w A

,,vA m

'd

RIVER WATER PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze river water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Quarterly Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-12. All samples were colle:tt:d and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a com-parison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-12a. All operational samples had no detectable activity and all preoperational samples also had no detectable activity.

Quarterly Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of quarterly samples is in Table 111-13. All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required. 'here are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a com-parison with the preoper6tional data is presented in Table III-12a. All operational samples had no detectable activity and all preoperational samples also had no detectable activity.

24

w d

h $ % k h 6

gs.

4 N

W asp ,

b

-- A 4

W N

f 6

w 4

._e ee.W V-e 6 k

-w 4

4

%= ,

'N -e. p + e e e es q . 4 6 - e e er & w= me e mi e .*

pg

+

W

\ 4

- N W ' g i,I %

7 %'s '

-- r \ 4,

. ~ .

\

?* , G rs . t

%* s 5

' 1

), ., , -

\{ g 4 E I '5\ \'1 "4

^. [ a I', i

.'V.%

i}\\()g . ._

., " ) .

' t

,. s .i, 1 4 ge , r. s.

\ %

w

.{- k7

, j tt u_ , -

"s -

-4 3

4 t

_= _

s

==e W -4 we 4 eM w -

0 .a M _,

-quB 9

9 -

W -

~

- emul' e m we e4 a 4 -e.4

-***e +9 9 -w e M m emp emi=s we m em

e w

~

r -

one d m

ad M &

'g M k a

e

* ,e 5 - As e d. m +mi e *

- 4.

m M M --O

s**4 emme ed e e end o

44 N g -f g en o ma em.

~

d e -

m.

~ ) 4m,9

-= ~ "

,. r3 *

'T

, 3 .*

<m, e 7 -.)

M W ==d M *=e W 3 3

"'l a . m e

-e

.g up.d *-4 g/- W

-.4

- + - .

.ee e

4 .#

4

I

'T , Y '% f 7 E _

h

,e I

1 a

.* +

m*

k 4

d.=

N ge m e.

.- -- 25 k =' a

' ~

As

/

Table III-12a RIVER WATER PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysis I-131 <.4 <.4 <8.5 <8.5 <8.5 Ba-140 (10 <10 <8.5 <8.5 <8.5 Co-58 <10 <10 <8.5 <8.5 <8.5 Cs-137 <10 <10 <8.5 <8.5 <8.5 Cs-134 <10 <10 <8.5 <8.5 <8.5 Mn-54 <10 <10 <7.5 <7.5 < 7. 5 Zn-55 <20 <20 <15.0 <15.0 <15.0 Co-60 <10 <10 <8.5 <8.5 <P.5 Tritium Analysis H-3 <320 <320 <100 <100 <100 25a

-p g

.- - . t * * .

-e me M .

's 15 5g ammir I

m 2

.h

,iumP n

b*so m

W a.

.- - , - r% s*

ox \\..s A- s\

\.; Nsf sc\\\

g s' -u -r .>

,s . \/

r -. 4 - - - 2 a..

.s , _

-w x )9 s

N. ] .A

- 3- (.

i-

%* MJ % . .g

- \.= v

.e s 6 , .

~s

s' s' t' j ?

g* g 9-

+

= M

,m

, tJ x .1 y-S *s e

%a ~

J

==d

.p e

+

5n- M

.= m

=b e.

m am 9 *

ene

e.

g , y e

Le s

- ~

.4 m M M g m - a-

= . . . _ ..

g 4

-, -e M a mm= .

9

-- =

M w * '

3 -

H , -

- m

- % "*r4 m'

~ '%

F Y

s --

a'Em 8%s.

M ulud M

- . M x

n m

M -" 4 A e e e

- em de o M

% m_

~

apan, eum

d ,s T

m

.9 *%, *.

- n' ^

Ma em. amas e I b

.==.,a w w H

m .-

k *$

-~ . s r , c -

+

+ a w .1 m k.

-O

=4 eum F T ['

-c'

.s.

u- .

26 Wte-

, a e

GROUND WATER PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze ground water samples. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The surmary for the gamma analysis of semiannual samples is in Table III-14 All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data is present-ed in Table III-14a. All operational samples had no detectable activity and there is no preoperational data.

Semiannual Tritium Analysis The summary for the tritium analysis of semiannual samples is in Table III-15. All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data is present-ed in Table III-14a. All operational samples had no detectable activity and there is no preoperational data.

9 27

w N

w

_w dame d [ 1 ) e em E k b

-o

-e 9

A am Ys

=*

M s$

M

= = -

I v

-j e, ee , , . , , - . s o. a a e .- = ~ ~ E = +

'"'9 N -.

w I M

, c

. ,d 4-

- n Y

& M O 4 "

%e me'e H me ==.e

-4

J

~. -

.. me M

M eau ee em e-emme umme m

~

+w g m

mm e

a f

e-g M - . .

~.

D -

n - - . , - ~

- - % - -e or

. m.

. . = = ==a

,o . -.- > _ _ __ - .. ..=. -

em on M

6

-m-e a se

w emm e ,4 ed w

O ** a A A A E 4

. e m

4 O M M W 90 A

=

- I.

e mN

e $ a $

/..

-s

)

'h

, ~ ~

n %

~

rm *

,, ~ ~ .. -. 1, e , 7 i l

,N

- I * ,

.4 in .- fo -

L *t e

~

. ..a '. J .

~b a

.- _4 h $

me f

( ( T y ( 1 A

Y M

A **

um E

-? g 4

~*

emsm

e h "4 b a # ,

.: 1 :, ~

m em .a

lable III-14a GROUND WATER PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Operational Values Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysis I-131 (8.5 <8.5 Ba-140 <8.5 <8.5 Co-58 <8.5 <8.5 Cs-137 <8.5 <8.5 Cs-134 <8.5 <8.5 Mn-54 <7.5 <7.5 Zn-65 <15.0 <15.0 Co-60 <8.5 <8.5 Tritium Analysis H-3 <100 <100 28a

em k

M m_

"W

- $ s,, .$

89

- , , O e

.es6 r amm wb N

" ef#

k "duur

A w

A am ess d

Y Aj ** d = = m . m M e

"*T'

~ _ L

,* e Cf

,z j -,

, - =

= . e

= %

rems

'g_

e. # _

f

<m m ,- p eE 4

JJ a,me 'b

- s

.=

~

- 4 m e e w

es en m

= .

6 eg *4 A e\,e -m

e une

( )

De 2

='ug$

k*

m_.

em eld

- g e .m e a.-. m .

I -** .*.o

~ a f '

% t , \

w >

w

.,\-. , J

~. - -

' .\ ,s s - i "

-. s vf g .

g-

.h - - u .* \

, % e4 Wr3 _-~ - .

me

'~

emus g e' -m m =o m M 9

.m em em4 e

g 8

.-- -e .w"m e &

M * - #

.r*

e mm e M

M A g em M "89

-4 4 einen m W

-= q m

- 4

- ; - 1 -

m ., 4 e

D_

= mm e J .,-a'

'9 M w w urin e4 mme

-i

4 M e -

g een r-

' ~ l

.. a - ; -

i ~*e w k N

+

- % 1 J A

.C

.g

u

==

N &

F ^*

L M .

%e .

& N w

"% *ib*

/

==m g \

Le

's M 4 'w,#

"e*' %

~ -e m

29

POTABLE WATER PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze potable water sdmples. There are no additional stations for this pathway. Two addition-al samples were collected at each station as part of the Enhanced Sampling Program for the gamma analysis.

Quarterly Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of quarterly samples is in Table III-16.

All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had annual average LLDs equal to or less than those required. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-16a. The 1978 operational activity was similar to the 1977 operational concentra-tions and was less than the preoperational activity levels except for Ba-140. Activity for Ba-140 was only found in two samples, one of which was at the LLD level. This activity is thought to be spurious.

Quarterly Tritium Analysis The sunwary for the tritium analysis of the quarterly samples is in Table 111-17. All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There are no critical stations in this pathway and all samples had activity that was less than the sample LLD. All preoperational samples had an average activity of less than 320 pCi/ t. There was, therefore, probably no increase in activity over the preoperational levels and the 1977 operational levels.

30

W

=

! 4 4 k l. Y e *

.? ^

-J l

e T T T 9 -^O W W m -m -,.m

2 -"

e a w w

,e.s .J w

. --a.

em %

W g.pp 6 *

.- V

-=* "

6 M euG M 4 4 .-e end

. +

4 y ** J 4 . ,. .% 4 .,. A . 4 - 4 . = 4 .. . m .A 4 A = 4 = -- a s & A % *% *

]

% 26 ;'N y - La r v ? m a

=( m >

r

.~e d e

4 ,% ,

O

--s. i c> - 1_4 .. ..

M ap

+

'w) ' "

~

-d

=

s ==e

--- b 94 s W 'd

^e-'

-% me %

4

--$ -4 5 $ 4 $ f a A A 4

.-. -. . : " ~

. , . . . m .A =$

m m g - m a N "* * -44, - -n amin

*49 w

- - -- _. 4 .- -

1

~ ..

. .. \s m o,N\\ ,' .,' s e _., ~

e - -

\ 't (',\ i y s __ -

, ,i )

o .

,.,y

,,\ h r0 p ~

I ( <-#'

.o >_

w e- ,ke-%a, g j

.g F

~

"h

-*8h g'

\'%.\. t \

h

- f , s \\ s, T 's

= =.a , ,,

3

~ ~ ==

k_^% g\ s 6

,g.,s

--.y ,\ y

~

\g')

-- - . . t a . - 1 . . . . .

s

%' .m- ..4-

.,j f e.g., e+d *

.= e m

4mi$

"e s M e

-es {

6 = s M

h A e m me

.e' J M r 9- 4

-- i < ~

=4 , 'd g=-4 e4 we W

=

. J g P

A = W -se .%

u

c. .

-. . - > = '

- a u -

d*

I L X 4 4 Y K J

t t

+

'.d.

,# h -< t.

4 'em= m y

8 ,,

7 v ausses m m u.

(

gg

~._

C ,< __. , . ~

- +g m

/ M 31

Table III-16a POTABLE WATER PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Gamma Analysis 1-131 <.4 <.4 <6.5 <4.6 <11.3 Ba-140 <10 <10 <22.5 < 15.6 <37.1 Cs-137 <10 <10 <3.0 <3.8 <7.9 Cs-134 <10 <10 <3.0 <3.7 <8.1 Co-58 <10 <10 <2.8 <3.1 <6.0 Mn-54 <10 <10 <2.8 <3.0 < 5. 7 Zn-65 (20 <20 <5.0 <6.2 <12.0 Co-60 <10 <10 <2.5 < 5.0 (19.3 Tritium Analysis H-3 <320 <320 <349.5 <305.5 <533.7 Ola

i

=

= Y R V i

-w M

M l-t_. 4 I.

4 W

X -

eme M

W

.d A

-- r o a , . 2

= 4 M

mm M JJ 21 0 ~ +

-(

x .

I,j . g A

m. - ,

% +

l ,9 3 a

I.; $ &*

% ^

iG N ,k i g- n

_ -* 1 . I ,; ' , , ) [1 1 g

+(

d s

i

-. [' .f., { r

. iig1,y.t .

,I ', 'i,i . '

i j.

I

.$i

+i',

'b'[

,ji i'

i

. 1)s ]i t's 1 :

i.N dQ DU J '

IlJJ' q

M -4 e4

& m

.M

.G e

- M M h w e

=-

M

um e m ~ -

t -

J m a ~

O - *

m - '*

,w , .~

0 .- -

a ,

p a

~~

7 w' & "A me & med M e . ..e Y

e--d eiume

%. Y= ===

=Whu.

. ,.w ah'

, - w ~

e Y e..- (

m a =

m en-

~ ~

.m

~ 'e

~

) $ +2 yx sw i4 '-y Z-

- 3

.s. =

g e4 -

.- r r - 4 4

Y h

.N

> .X J

, ~

g 4 . +.

A aL T's ~

L* ~_(.,1 d m.e 32

SHORELIf4E EXTERNAL SEDIMENT PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze shoreline ex-ternal sediment samples. There are no additional stations for this path-way. One additional sample was collected at each station as part of the Enhanced Sampline Program for the gamma analysis.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table 111-18. Samples were not reported for the first half at Sample Sta-tion Cl4H because of excessive LLDs due to naturally occurring nuclides.

All other samples were collected and analyzed and the annual average LLDs for all nuclides were equal to or less than those required. The critical stations for this analysis are Sample Stations C14H, C14M, and C14G and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-19.

The 1978 operational data is equal to or less than the preoperational data and sin.ilar te the 19/7 operational data for almost every nuclide. The lack of more cpera ional data prevents a nore thorough comparison. Also, the control statior data is very similar to the critical station data.

Semiannual Sr-90 Analysis The summary for the strontium analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-20. Due to a laboratory accident, the sample for the first half from Station C09 was lost. All other samples were collected and analyzed and all LLDs for all nuclides were equal to or less than those required.

There are no critical stations for this analysis. A statistical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table III-20. There is no preoper-ational data.

The operational concentrations in 1978 are similar to the 1977 operational concentrations.

33

N =

m &

J w

e [ , [ 4 T [ Y Y h $ . \ q b A -- E *

- , .~A - e m, ., m

.m A

'_O 4 -

m eg, ae- ..%

V g

'O T i N t

'A

,M '

4r 4,J ' -j

^ .

4

- .sg

,,,,g + M d ed

- .,-e y e M

.. 4A V y ,. ,g 'gp uw" *# *e8' *#

. g) zr ,

e44

0

.4 b

s

2 -- x ; . - s ,. 4 t 2 -. .; a + , ,. . ; ,a e a a ,. ; .A 1 1 - -.L a- a s 1 + - 4 - A 5 4 A

, ., . - .- , .~ ~n - n h '$ ?

- - .J ,

?, 0

.e

=, - _ ,W

- T

- ,, -- g b h,- 4 Z C's - . A t N i ,, ~ l

. ' 1 y_ - , -? 1 ('l

+

v gd C, ,.

-. peg F&, ahis 4 m'

f 4 eme J. i m

me %

P4

+p -y ,* 'd^f w

-ers,n 4 4 g % ,me d

.m W

~d ** 8'%

,4".

& m J

= .-ig 4

.a mm O

M

,, C . ,

2 a . r. - . .a x ,

. _ . r . * . x '

A 6 .-

w.

,. - em

,e

%* y y

.due

% w *

-m

^

m & a e J .s

'.)

~

med 1

-- - :. = . -

a r P% +

+ =

i n ,. ; 4 .a . .. x .

m A

'3

- Am.

s - - -

.s

.4 6

4 - - .

m,

---..'C.) m =>

-e--e e ere9 M% 4, 4 awe

,& & -g g .-

,4 ,* - p. 4

- . - . -. w g ,

_ ~

M

. .w g _.

1

-7 N . ^ d .

8 "i ""t *" N ^

-b g

.b.e y% J -w - 4 6

' **e *4 w *'% 69

= - -. 6 g

g -S q 4 -#'M emf' ' mi# *# mri' % -- # au' */

w ,f 9 e ,

em' e. ) 1

%k A *.

j %

M45 W 8 a

'84 q

% .v. m v . v **

mm e4 m

e- M #

- , "" - - +' f e 4 Z + * . - - - - . f 1 ( (

. pr

% em . Ae N a. W .

=

d eJ M

- d

=e 4 A 3

b I ame qu M

-+ m m as. = m a,\. .m

=*4 em .e. J 88" = N m ese 8 -

-,J +Y. .$,

~

W ,. 4 --*

4

,4 . -

W ..e -

S

' ._ e ~ .* y er -* =,

IJ, 4- h %.# . <.

^

.d- .a. w L

~

e ~ r .

k h A ~ E / " i e .

A

.eemi 6

C

)" 's

" 1 .-

Z.-

-r .d f

>= 1 '. ) ,_, ';. l,

.# 2 s -- s .i I .1 ,,

gg L

w+ -

r, I ,L i, ,j I: i

,e% _ s

-k1I . l '4 , 'b g f

m .

...y 4 l $,,. i.}. g , i n

t + g ( P, . k ,' . ;. t ! \d(( l,a

. < . i ip . , . \)1 ,g l ., sy i

+1 uu -

s

\J

l e

s i n t o n 3 8 8 1 3 , / 2 1

8 i e . . . . . . . . . -

t c 4 9 8 7 0 8 3 3 7 8 6 -

a r 5 9 < 2 0 4 1 1 < 1 2 t e 8 < < 1 ( < < < 5 S P (

l 5 a 9 c

i t 2 9 0 4 2 0 1 1 8 6 5 i n . . . . . . -

r a 6 4 4 2 4 6 5 5 2 6 6 -

C e 7 4 < 1 3 1 < < < < 2 M 4 < < < < 3 l

e s i n t o n 5 5 0 5 1 8 1 4 3 7 8 i e . . . . . -

t c 1 0 0 5 2 5 1 8 6 2 9 -

a r 9 1 1 2 6 3 1 < < 1 7 t e 3 1 < < < < < < 3 s S P e

u l 5 l o 9

) a r 9 V t k n 8 7 8 8 9 9 7 8 6 3 7

/ l o n . . . -

Y i a C a 4 2 4 2 3 1 4 4 2 5 4 -

A C n e 4 7 < 1 2 1 < < < < 5 W p o M 2 ( < < 1 H ( i T t A S a P E r S e T Y p e N L O l E A i M N t 9 I A n 8 2 2 0 8 8 4 3 6 9 3 9 1 D e . .

- E F c 0 1 9 6 4 2 2 1 6 5 9 4 1 S O r 5 1 < 2 8 4 1 1 < 1 1 2 1 e 7 1 < < < < < < 5 <

1 L N P <

A O e N I 5 l R T 9 b E A a T U T X L 3 8 4 6 8 3 9 0 7 0 9 2 E A n . . .

V a 2 6 4 2 9 4 4 5 2 6 2 2 E E e 7 5 < 1 2 1 < < < < 5 1 N M 3 < < < < 2 <

I L L A E C R I n 5 5 3 8 3 5 0 5 5 5 5 O T a . . . .

H S i 4 9 4 0 5 0 3 4 l 3 0 -

S I d 2 5 < 1 l 1 < < < < 7 -

T e 3 < < < < 2 A M T n S o i

t a

s e t e l s

u i l t l a n 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 9 - 6 - a V e 0 0 3 1 9 5 4 1 1 - 0 - c c 0, 3 < 6 2 < 0, i l r t a e 0 1 i n P 1 r o c i 5 t 9 r a o r f e

p n 8 s s o a 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 - i - e e i 0 9 1 9 1 1 1 1 - 9 s - d r d 9 < < 1 < < < 5 y i P e s 2 2 l l M i a c s n u y A n l

a m l n u a e A *

i c

d 6 2 0 6 7 4 t i i a 2 3 1 4 0 3 5 3 4 5 n 0 t l

c m 2 2 3 1 1 1 9 1 5 6 0 o 9 i m - - 1 - - - - - - - 4 r - r u a a h - a e s r s n n - t r C N G R T l B R C Z C M Z K S S

M

> 3

=

M

~_g4

-4 e $ $

M O 4 e e

e b

ee

-e

.a

[6-

d' W -

==

.e,

. 4 d *

- . me . == - i ==

s ; s N I. "

3

] >==9 -4

.m s - a

- . e m k

~; _ i s w m 3 -

'w U.'.*

M

\ j

8 ' k 7

4 M L - ,

e e e g - V M M ,a

. m a e,m M e eur 96 6 #*

p e age ,e m , e e 4 ee ,

m A 6 %

W = .mo e I 4 ~ -

ae

" Z 7 m-e -. - -

-1 N

~ - -~ ~,= e .m" . ,

D a

p. . ~ w -'

.- -* e. ~

4 'd'e"'

- ~ ,

.% ,am,

M M g e

.~ - .

e m" m

'e ** em o e N E 4 d

'm 4 w en ""4 M ~

.m.e . % sw

.e ee 4 eb $ ~ L e ~-e ,

j w c -

N W -

._ f 1

01

* 'd

.

1

-- y -, .94 j,a gi p 9 j . ;,-li 3, n

P-iip! p i -i+!i lv

'\U l;b7 x p ui, ,s'stdU --. ,

i' g\ {)n 3,

~

ev v \

a- :- -; a m

yN

, ,-gAw r*

- * .T 4 3 *A T 4 X

e. -

d g

w A

.* d

.)

. MuuD

h

m%4,,h "e9 ,,s g

_ e '-., ;

36

SR FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze marine plants in the sea food chain. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gcrmia Analysis i

The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-21. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to cr less than those required. There are no critical stations in this pathway., A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-22.

The 1978 operaticnal concentrations are less than both the 1977 operational and the preoperational concentrations.

Semiannual Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The summary for the strontium analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-23. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had annual average LLDs equal to or less than those required. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data is presented in Table 111-22. There is no preoperational data.

The 1977 and 1978 operational concentrations are very similar.

37

o

~, *

=.

A

- E

-e st 't 2 .t .,'L 2 : 1 2 +

X 3 ,5 '*4 $ 5 K 2 2 * - .L s % L ' E 2 A I. 4 l

-o .

' .es E 7 **

'7 7 "T Y

- . -, m === -=

f *

'O O O % Z T --

I Z E Z ~, Z

., s k.a

. J .k w' , r

_ C ,.

a

., ,4 -

IA .mo w -a w .e *e-d -* C V ,.J d V V *ge' m

Z- U .,A ab Y e 6

J, a y a, ,m. - J

,-,.6 s sJ s-

's J ,I L s .

-4

..%,e**

=

4 +

A em a .e 1 J d me <4 A .4 4 + 'd ,s A J m e 4 d, o A -S A .4 o A ** $ "C A *A

A =$ -5 .5 5 .e A 4m n6 em =. AA % e='- + +-s

.N. m%

y= -A

,s

~.

=,

L4, s a.g 4

,* M C i) .

t. M + ea 4( N. [== 4 s- .] .4 s# s A M da I \ l \ \ g \ .

t' ' N ?#

^

"- p j Qf

I g9 43'9% M (*.*i! "N .g.4 +b t . . . .=. ai 4,}

Q) ] Jg c,. _. uF .q

. , s L *-8 4{d -v _- v s vv y vv v

,_ - /~) .-

- +

- + ,s ,

~

+

~.

- %, y

E'* A

i

me a ,e

% ; l

_s } } - . ~ 1 . E t :. 't 3 . + ' . .4 ~ .n ~

Z _-.,

- O

- ,N ,%

w.

.% ,, <. -o,r -

.%,. w .J ===.- t

-- v ~e .J

'.s .

- -- .2 . ,. ; - .- 4 - ., . - - J; a .; a ; .- J J i - ; - a a s - = .= =.- % % -% .a

] ,,,,

-m e .< -s m M M . ~ .o. ,

^- '

w

y g l -

m -

M

,.i s' .,

._ , - . - .e. , - . .s

" C 4, a-

- .=. %.

m -* ..

O -

.w ..- .2

~- 'm-.

H m*

me g.*

2 '- <

~"' .,v v .a, v vv v v ., .- v

+

4 a -

m e _+ ,, .

_Y V g 4

'MI wN ae Sa ,

.%8 '*

e-. +e --

e", 'w

, '" ** -s ne e NN eN b e$ e A m o b -% A -# .5 & s a .s a N , o " $ &

v

== === m #

^ *g

S a

w -

ie n

e. -

4

[ '= 'd . W w .- .

r - ~

~,,

= - --*

, - s

~~ , t ' 2 - r J g . t 1 2 6 m ".W8 end

=

b .'%

==. eg ase e.#

S *= *.

- - -'4 { ,'J g

- J % _.- J .

) j 7 i.) f 's f

- " a. g **4

~

-. x, , c.; - -

v -a '$

I i !

..s., 7 :. .- , e. m .-,A a

tv s

m m ,e m

.8r ?8"m M M me%n* -V 4 mm.y 4 m a ehe L

-* 4 4 4 1 .I . ' .

_ ' . 1 , #

. :" "J ', I 1 y : A r '

+

9 ee

.'( W 'eed a

- g

8 e

=

% -m

~% y e ~b .,me

% ah

-9

e.

.ma. , -.

- 8 --. ;

g us- = $g \

'.,, Zw( -- t b ,,

J.J 38 f f popID (0 !p U'lbhMM. !$N u wv m

E,

'> n P A g i a. (%. , a 'o i '-

t.

16a Q L) u

Table 111-22 SEA FOOD CHAIN PATHWAY STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentila Garana Analysis Ra-226 624 3300 33.5 33.5 53.9 Th-232 --

280 30.5 28.5 41.4 1-131 <10 37 <2.5 <2.5 <4.1 Ba-140 <10 75 <9.5 <9.0 <14.8 Ru-106 --

360 <27.8 <31.6 <59.8 Cs-137 <10 181 <8.0 <7.3 <11.1 Zr-95 18 157 <5.3 <6.4 <12.5 Mn-54 -- 43 <2.8 <3.8 <8.0 Zn-65 --

156 <6.0 <6.38 <10.1 K-40 1508.4 12570 3623.5 3330.5 6855.6 Strontium Analysis Sr-89 -- -- --

<4.1 <13.2 Sr-90 -- -- --

<1.3 <3.1 39

W. 4 g k . m 7.

m.

4 w

G-

' ./'

O Ya -

4 -

l'_.

w -

- 5 J

~

3 .1 4

.: V x

3 == $J .i .a 4a .4 ..

~ x - ~ . -

%* .ee

.y 4 Pk

_ 1 w4

- s, -

-t

,a, ,e,. ,

.* %< - N

., v L.J - s

, m. g m.

. , s, j e

e &

- s4 ,

M M 'g .

? .

~

m ( '

~~

e

~

4_ ".

aG s .'a a e4 M n & 5 *

" W e

== ""O WM

- J

== 4 . 4 . E . . 4

_ .m .- .*

N .-

1-

-- 9 M g o e ee* \

o ._

- x

- ~ .g\ %,.\$>

- _ <xs' 4.

W, \-)v r s.

c, c yg m

o ,s - .

p, -

_' * ,.7 % \,\' ' .g a

w

,ss g-h s\\\

sL\ x )v -

\',,

\

~ -

~

wM e , \\ . Y

-* ~e. - t c

i,

\ ,\J sN '\ v D

t.my\N-w

. - -i # s Z *

.O

, mi

's \. Nx 'e['[

s

$ ^,

,e )

,\ s'n>

.- - . -- , = . C%)% '.

~ ,

r .- - t

, )

m

.e* -

m 4 ~ N u, -

~

.an e 4 =* . 4 T d om Y

me, s.e J

- 4 9 % M m.m I .e Mv **

w o w f

, p

f% *%, ^

J.

S d &

, s

.* ..nh

.,l , . -v 1 s( ' , ,

' A ,

mm v .

W g b k f

'I J

e 2 '=

m q fQ

't *(,,=-

s -

. '- -- e k

.; .s --

m

, vg.,

.e b

b .. e

_ -- .4 rV 9

INGESTION CRAB PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze crabs. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The sunmary for the gamma analysis of the edible portion of semiannual samples is in Table 111-24. The sample for the first half at C30 was not collected due to the unsuccessful attempts at entrapment. All other samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required. Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a com-parison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-25.

The 1978 operational concentrations are less than both the 1977 operational and preoperational concentrations except for naturally occurring K-40 which has similar concentrations for the three periods. The concentrations of the critical and control stations during 1978 were in close agreement.

41

em

'J y

d %r

-- ,s a = < r , s.. x ;- : m - .x - - , . - - - - r. < . . s 1 1 ; .;. a :

M M 44S m%

+_,,, 6 M .

4 Y ~

s On %

Q %

. $ 8"'4

M

!x 5 ~

Nem .

'M 4, Zt w -s -c

!.*e'*

4 '_ ( 4

)

e

.m.

.s

- "J*

I

'4 M

.x

== :4 .; i 4 . .a 4 <* .4a4 J 4 - - . e - 4 . L -. ;A 4 -6 d e ia -. -4 a

,% g + .-= m N 2 .4 =

- C ,.

2" w (

<C N '4 e _

$-J 'A M I) * \

. h

Q C1 ,

e -< ve wJ e4 e#

W 3 W iIe e _

t - "s

, , .j . - # 'e

g -

3 %

s

.ma* e& fY %

==. e.- s

. .- a ,

1. , -

m A&

r 'M

, _==, 's - J, ,, .

I " l Y . I % ' y i & J *, , T "' 5 - , .(

'L'e'* w e

so , **

Q 6

_ ed be M a % *W. m .' we

e. **O d essh

. ._ y '

== ** , , A ; 4 .; .4 ' - J ,. ; . .. .. . . . " J . _ _ a . . . . . .

. .- % m +

v -*

._- a C\1 **

g .

. "i t==4 . * ==

~

m 2 C

-< - i x, ~

,J, .

t Y N m8h Q ,'8g V'

4E ~

N

-4 4

edies

,g w

h 4

wed

~x

,=,__ ~.em

8F- YW wg

,, 4 g ,i, ai.

.E m.

.e -4 4 e

~ M M gp 4

,1 ** A '

.~4 we w N

_- , .+

- -6 4

E w A .am mm m e. . s . $ . & f es a ' $

m 'f _ ', 4 6 , . +

% O.o" u

=

_, - m -~' .,.- ..

~

quy

~~ *~ ~

r* % *

- 4 - : ~4 s . % '

,. d 4

e e.'

M .

-1

.a J

-- < -a - - -

4 - t

- r

,*^

D I 9 ~

- ", ~ ~. t, --.e

.s

& ". 'o me a A -

. . m

' ~

~ 1 - .

'M

'~ %

N

- ( '

4 % r '1

s. s 5C 3 .5 * - :" - p 4 .; 4 1 .

s F\ g I 1 e

c Mm- \\ s o ,ix s.'\

vc t\no\jp . ,p\

.'-

c -

-g i\\\W; ij b m c e u\w

'4 4

a 7'

r p . i; \ ,,

OQ s i, 'cs -i s* .i g,a *

-~ *f .* \ g ;s \d \\

]N i ) isy s 'h s ,

_. \o 9 9

.e em -

4 "W'%

a

Table III-25 INGESTION CRAB PATHWAY SEMNNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 94 Percentile Control Stations Critical Stations Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 1325 3600 63.0 65.7 95.4 82.0 -

57.5 72.8 Th-232 92 170 <12.0 <18.3 <24.2 12.0 -

<21.5 <64.5 1-131* <10 <10 <4.0 <3.5 <5.2 <4.0 -

<3.3 <5.3 Ba-140 <10 55 <9.5 <12.3 <17.4 <13.0 -

<12.0 <l8.9 0 Ru-106 -- --

<21.5 <21.8 <23.0 <22.5 -

<21.5 <21.5 Cs-137* <10 75 <3.5 <3.5 <4.5 <3.0 -

<3.8 (4.4 Zr-95 <10 13 ( 4. 5 <5.2 < 7. 4 <4.5 -

< 5. 5 <8.3 Cs-134* <10 <10 <3.5 <3.5 <4.5 <3.0 -

<3.8 <4.4 Mn-54 <80 24 <3.0 <3.0 <4.0 <2.5 -

<3.3 <3.9 Zn-65 <160 127 < 7.0 <7.2 <9.6 <7.0 -

<'.3 <10.7 K-40 1424.6 2011.2 1790.0 1630.0 2478.3 1790.0 -

1550.t 2686.5

Critical nuclides for critical station

INGESTION CARNIVOROUS FISH PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze carnivorous fish. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the edible portion of semiannual samples is in Table III-26. The samples for the first half at C30 were not collected due to the unsuccessful attempts at capture. All other samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required. Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this path-way and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-27.

The operational concentrations for 1978 are less than both the 1977 operational and the preoperational concentrations except for naturally occurring K-40 where the concentrations were similar.

1 44

Table III-26 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MON!TORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-332 CITRUS COUNTY FLORIDA REPORT ING PER IOD 01/01/78--12/31/78 P AT Hk AY l TYPE 6 NO. LLD A LOCATIONS l HIGHEST MEAN LOCATION

- - - - l******4***LL 1 CONTR(L LOCATION

- - - - l*******************lNRR ***

C. FISH * * * * * * *

(PC1/KG)

GAMMA * * * * *

INGESTION

ANALYSIS 4 * * * * *

0

RA-226

12

43( 3/ 3)*C30

61( 1/ 1)* 61( 1/ 1)*

* * ( 21- 61)* * * *

TH-232

11

21( 2/ 3)*C30

22( 1/ 1)* 22( 1/ 1)*

* * ( 19- 22)* * * *

I- 131

5

6( 1/ 3)*C30

6( 1/ 1)* 6( 1/ 1)*

M * [fA-140

19

ND * * * *

RU-106

47

14( 1/ 3) *C2 9

14( 1/ 2)* O( O/ 1)*

CS-137 4 6

13( 3/ 3) *C30

15( 1/ 1)* 15( 1/ 1)*

* * ( 5- 20)* * * *

ZR- 95

9

ND + 4 * *

CS-134

6

ND ,

MN- S4

6

ND * * * *

ZN- 6S

13

7( 1/ 3) *C2 9

7( 1/ 2)* O( O/ 1)*

K - 40

97

1517( 3/ 3)*C30

2020( 1/ 1)* 2020( 1/ 1)*

* * ( 242- 2290)* * *

I

Table 111-27 INGESTION CARNIVOROUS FISH PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL oAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Control Stations Critical Stations Mean 95 Percentile Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 335 2400 47.0 43.0 82.8 61.0 -

34.0 70.0 Th-232 --

92 <19.0 <16.2 <31.2 22.0 -

<13.3 <17.2 I-131* <10 <10 <3.5 <3.8 < 7.8 <6.0 -

<2.8 <4.8 Ba-140 <10 72 <8.5 <9.7 <14.5 <8.5 -

<10.3 <16.5 Ru-106 -- -

<19.0 <17.3 <23.0 <19.0 -

<16.5 <23.4 Cs-137* <10 43 15.0 13.3 28.3 15.0 -

12.5 33.3 Zr-95 <10 12 <4.0 <4.7 <6.9 <4.0 -

<5.0 <7.8 Cs-134* <10 <10 <2.5 <13.3 <28.3 <2.5 -

<12.5 <33.3 Mn-54 <80 <80 <2.5 <2.8 <4.9 <2.0 -

<3.3 <5.3 Zn-65 <160 99 <5.5 (5.d <7.9 < 5.0 -

<6.3 (8.3 K-40 2346.4 3854.8 2020.0 1517.3 3698.2 2020.0 -

1266.0 4104.4

Critical nuclides for critical station

INGESTION HERBIV0ROUS FISH PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze herbivorous fish. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The sunmary for the gamma analysis of the edible portion of semiannual samples is in Table 111-28. The samples for the first half at C29 and C30 and for the second half at C29 were not collected due to the unsuccessful attempts at capture. All other samples were collected and analyzed and all nu.-lides had LLDs equal to or less than those required. Sample Station C29 is the critical station in this pathway and no sample had activity greater than 10 times the control station value. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-29.

The 1978 operational concentrations are lower than both the 1977 opera-tional and the preoperational concentrations.

47

Table 111-28 ENV IRONMENT AL R AD IULO GI C AL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCK ET NO . 50-332 C ITRUS COUNT Y. FLOR ID A RE POR T I NG PERIOD 01/01/78-12/31/78 PATHWAY l TYPE & NO. l LLD ALL LOCATIONS l HIGHEST MFAN L OC A TION l CCNTROL LOCATION lNRR

- - - - l******************4****************** ****************************

H. FISH * * * * * * *

( PC I/KG )

GAMMA * * * * *

INJESTION

ANALYSIS 4 * * * * *

0

RA-226

16

34( 1/ 1 ) *C 3 0

34( 1/ 1)* 34( 1/ 1)*

e * * * *

T H-23 2

13

36( 1/ 1) *C 30

36( 1/ 1)* 36( 1/ 1)*

I- 131

8

ND * * * *

BA-140

28

ND * * *

u * * * * *

CG * * * * * *

RU-106

62

ND * * * *

CS-137

7

12( 1/ 1)*C30

12( 1/ 1)* 12( 1/ 1)*

ZR- 95

11

ND * * * *

CS-134

8

ND * * * *

MN- 54

7

ND * * * *

ZN- 65

15

ND * * * *

K - 40

75

1220( 1/ 1)*C30

1220( 1/ 1)* 1220( 1/ 1)*

e l

s i n t o n i e M M M M M M M M M M M t c / / / / / / / / / / /

a r C C C C C C C C C C C t e N N N N N N N N N N N S P l 5 a 9 c

i t

i n M M M M M M M M M M M r a / / / / / / / / / / /

C e C C C C C C C C C C C M N N N N N N N N N N N e

l s i n t o n i e t c - - - - - - - - - - -

a r t e s S P e

u l 5 l o 9 a r V t 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 5 0 n . .

l o n 4 6 4 4 1 ? 5 4 3 7 0 a C a 3 3 < 1 3 1 < < < < 2 Y ) n e < < 2 A g o M 1 W k i H / t T i a A C r P p e

( p e H O l S S i I I t 9 F S n 2 Y e

- S L c - - - - - - - - - - -

1 0 A r 1 0 N e 1 x A P 0

e V A 5 l I M 9 b B M a R A 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 5 0 T E G H n 4 6 4 4 1 2 5 4 3 7 0 L a 3 3 < 1 3 1 < < < < 2 N A e < < 2 O U M 1 I N T N S A 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 5 0 E I n G M a 4 6 4 4 1 2 5 4 3 7 0 N E i 3 3 < 1 3 1 < < < < 2 I S d < < 2 e 1 M

n i

o t

s e a t

e l s

u i l t l a n 6 a V e 0 4 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 3 c c 0 8 1 5 9 1 1 8 6 0 i l r 1 < 1 < < 0 t a e 3 1 i n P 3 r o c i 5 t 9 r a o r f e

p n 8 s o a 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 e e i 6 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 8 6 8 d r d 9 < < < < < < 1 7 i P e < 1 l M 2 c u

n l

a e *

c d 6 2

0 6 7 4 i i 2 3 1 4 0 3 5 3 4 5 t l 2 2 3 1 1 1 9 1 5 6 0 i c - - 1 - - - - - - - 4 r u a h - a u s r s n n - C N R T I B R C Z C M Z K

e

INGESTION OYSTERS PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze oysters.

There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The suamary for the gamma analysis of the edible portion of semiannual samples is in Table 111-30. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-31.

The 1978 operational concentrations are lower than both the 1977 opera-tional and preopoerational concentrations except for Ru-106 which is probably the result of including concentrations that were less than the minimum detectable activities in the statistics.

50

R*

R* 0 N*

l* **************************************

N*

O*

I+ -

4 4 4 4 4 T*

A* N N N N N C* M M M M M O* U U U U U L* L L L L L

O O O O O L* C C C C C O*

R* E E E E E T* E E E E E N* S S S S S O*

C*

8 7

l*

e************************e************

)) )) ) ) ))

/ N* 22 27 2 2 20 Y 1 O* 6 4 4 R 3 I* 4 A / T* 1 M 2 2 A*

M 0 1 C* /- / - / / /-

U 3 - O* 29 28 1 1 20 S - 8 L* 3 2 7 0 7

2 M 5 / N* 1 A 1 A*

R . 0 E* t( (( ( ( ((

G O / M* i 8 6 a 5 O N 1

S 3 9 1 5 R 0 T* 3 P T S* 1 E D E*

G K O H***************************************

N C I G*

I O R I* 0 0 9 9 0 R D E H* 3 3 2 2 3 O P

C C C C C T l* *******************************e******

I G * )) )) )) ) ))

N N

42 47 46 4 40 0 O I

6 4 9 4 3 M T S* 4

- R N* 1 1

L O O*

1 1

A P I* / - / - /- / /-

C E T* 49 49 22 1 44 e I 3 R A* 3 1 D D 8 D D D 9 l G C* N N N N N 9 b O T O*

a L I L*

O N * (( (( (( ( ((

I U A L* 6 1 9 1 9 D D L* 4 3 8 1 2 A P I A* 2 R E R

1 V O

L I A R F L l*

T .

2 1 6 0 8 7 9 5 3 8 N L Y D* 1 1 2 4 1 9

E A T L*

M T N L*

N S U

O Y O R R C l*

I C

4 V S .*

N U O*

E R N* 6 2 1 0 6 7 5 4 5 0 T

S 2 3 3 4 0 3 9 5 6 4 I

&* I 2 2 1 1 1 1 C

S - - - - - - -

E* AY A H A U S R N N P* ML R T I B R C Z M Z K Y* MA T* AN

GA l*

Y* N A* ) O W* SGI H* RKT T* E/S A* TIE P* SCG

PN

O(I g~

Table III-31 INGESTION OYSTERS PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 --

534 40.5 45.5 67.1 Th-232 -- --

29.0 31.0 53.9 I-131 <10 <10 <2.5 <2.8 <3.7 Ba-140 <10 <10 <10.3 <10.0 <12.9 Ru-106 --

82 <53.3 <55.3 <132.6 Cs-137 <10 <10 <5.8 <6.3 <14.0 Zr-95 <10 <10 <5.0 <4.6 <6.8 Mn-54 <80 <80 <2.8 <2.6 <3.6 Zn-65 <160 33 <6.8 <7.0 <8.4 K-40 --

1843.6 1240.0 1228.5 1589.5 52

INGESTION SHRIMP PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze shrimp. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The surmiary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table 111-32. The sample for the second half at C27 was not available from the Ralston Purina Research Facility. The other sample was collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to 'r less than those required.

There are no critical stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-32a.

One sample lacks the statistics for an evaluation of the operational data or a rigorous comparison with the preoperational data. The activity found in the shrimp does, however, correspond to that found in the preoperational and the 1977 operational shrimp. It should be noted that discharge canal water was not used for shrimp raising in 1978.

53

R*

R* 0 N4 I4**********************************

N*

O*

I* 4 4 4 4 T*

A* N N N N C* M M M M O* U U U U L* L L L L

O O O O L* C C C C O*

R* E E E E Ta E E E C N* S S S S O*

C*

4 8

7 l*

) ) )

)

/ N* 1 1 1 1 Y 1 O*

R 3 I*

A / T*

M 2 2 A*

M 0 1 C* / / / /

U 3 - O* 1 1 1 1 S - 8 L*

0 7

M 5 / N*

A 1 A*

R . 0 F* ( ( ( (

G O / M* 1 O 9 0 O N 1

7 S 3 4 R 0 T* 1 2

P T S* 1 E D E*

2

". CK O I H***********************************

G*

1 O R I* 7 7 7 7 R D E H* 2 2 2 2 O P

C C C C T

I G l*

) ) ) )

N N

1 1 1 1 2 O I

3 M T R

S*

- N*

I L O O*

I I

A P I* / / / /

C E T* 1 1 1 1 eIG 3 R A*

C*

D O D D D D l N N N N N N b C T O*

T aL I L*

O N * ( ( ( (

I U A L* 1 O 9 0 D D L* 7 S 3 4 A R I A* 1 2

R E R

1 V O

L I L l4**********************************

A R

T F.

9 7 0 9 1 1 4 8 8 2 N L Y D* 1 1 1 3 7 1 1 7 E A T L*

M T N L*

N S U

O R

Y R

O C

l*

I C

2 V S .*

N U O*

E R N* 6 2 1 0 6 7 0 T

S ? 3 3 4 0 3 5 4 5 4 I &* I 2 2 1 1 1 1 9 5 6 C

S - - - - - - - - - -

E* AY A H A U S R N N P* ML R T I B R C Z M Z K Y* MA T* AN

GA I4**********************************

Y* N A* )O W* GI H* PKT T* M/S A* I1E P* RCG

HPN

S(I

g

Table III-32a INGESTION SHRIMP PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSES (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 -- -- 85.5 85.5 --

Th-232 -- 36 25.0 25.0 --

I-131 <10 <10 <5.0 <5.0 --

Ba-140 (10 <10 19.5 19.5 --

Ru-106 -- -- <35.5 <35.5 --

Cs-137 <10 37 <4.5 <4.5 --

Zr-95 <10 <10 <7.0 <7.0 --

Mn-54 <80 <80 <4.0 <4.0 --

Zn-65 <160 <160 (9.0 <9.0 --

K-40 921.8 2514 <36.0 <36.0 --

54a

INGESTION MILK PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze milk. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Monthly Ganina Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the monthly samples is in Table 111-33. The samples at Sample Station C49 were not collected due to the unavailability of milk. All other samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had annual average LLDs equal to or less than those re-qui red. Sample Station C49 is the critical station for this type of analysis. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-34.

The 1978 operational concentrations are similar to bnth the 1977 opera-tional and the preoperational concentrations including Cs-137 which was elevated in 1977 due to the Chinese weapons tests fallout.

Monthly Sr-89 and 90 Analysis The summary for the strontium analysis of the monthly samples is in Table 111-35. The samples at Sample Station C49 were not collected due to the unavailablity of milk, All other samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LL0s equal to or less than those required. Sample There is no critical station for this type of analysis. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-34.

The 1978 operational concentrations are similu to both the 1977 opera-tional and the preoperational concentrations.

55

R*

R* 0 N*

I4***********************e***e*

)) ) 1 )

N* 29 2 2 2 O* 11 1 1 1 I*

T*

A*

C* / - / / /

O* 18 1 1 1 L* 1

t L*

O*

R* (( ( ( (

T* 3 6 0 S N* 1 1 O*

C*

8 l* *****************************

7 * )) ) ) )

/ N* 29 2 2 2 Y 1 O* 11 1 1 1 R 3 I*

A / T*

M 2 2 A*

M 0 1 C* / - / / /

U 3 - O* 18 1 1 1 S - 8 L* 1 0 7

M 5 / N*

A 1 A*

R . 0 E* (( ( ( (

G O / M* 3 6 0 S O N 1

1 1 R 0 T*

P T S*

E D E*

G K O H******************************

N C I G*

I O R I* 7 7 7 7 R D E H* 4 4 4 4 O P

C C C C T I4*****************************

I G * )) ) ) )

N N

29 2 2 2 3

3 O I

11 1 1 1

- M T S*

1 R N*

1 L O O*

1 A P I* /- / / /

C E T* 18 1 1 1 l

eI 3 R A* D D 1 D D b G C* N N N N a O T O*

T L I L*

O N * (( ( ( (

I U A L* 3 6 0 S D D L* 1 1 A R I A*

R E R

V O

L I L I4*****************************

A R F

T ,

8 S 7 0 7 6 6 6 N L Y D* 2 1 C A T L*

M T N L*

N S U

O Y O l* *****************************

R R C

I C

4 V

4 S .* 2 t U O*

E R N* 1 0 7 5 4 4 0 T

S 3 4 3 9 3 8 5 6 I f,

I 1 1 1 l 5

C

S - - - - - - - -

E* AY A S R S O N O P* ML I D C Z C C M C Y* MA T* AN

GA l*

Y* N A* O W* )I H* LT T* /S A* KIE P* LCG

IPN

M( I mm

l e

s i n t o n i e M M M M M M M M t c / / / / / / / / - -

a r C C C C C C C C - -

t e N N N N N N N N S P l 5 a 9 c

i t

i n M M M M M M M M r a / / / / / / / / - -

C e C C C C C C C C - -

M N N N N N N N N l

e s i n t o n 4 1 4 5 0 4 8 i e . . b. - -

t c 7 1 9 8 6 5 7 8 - -

a r < 2 1 < < < < (

t e < <

s S P e

u l 5 l o9

)

g a r V t k n 9 5 2 5 5 9 4 1

/ l o n . - -

i a C a 3 2 2 4 3 2 3 4 - -

C n e < 1 1 < < < < <

p e M < <

( i t

S a E r Y S e A Y p e W L O l H A i T N t 4 A A n 4 1 4 5 0 4 8 5 4 2 3 P e . . .

- F c 7 1 9 8 6 5 7 8 8 6 1 K O r < 2 1 < < < < ( < <

1 L e < <

1 I N P M O e I 5 l N T 9 b O A a I U T T L 9 5 2 5 5 9 4 1 1 5 S A n . .

E V a 3 2 2 4 3 2 3 4 4 2 G E e < 1 1 < < < < < < <

N M < <

I L A

C I n 5 3 5 5 0 8 0 0 0 0 T a S i 3 2 2 5 4 2 3 3 4 2 I d < 1 1 < < < < < < <

T e < <

A M T n S o i

t s e a

t e l s

u i l t l a n a V e 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 c c 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 - i l r < < < < < < < 6 t a e i n P r o c i 5 t

a 9 r r f o

ep n o a s s 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 i - 0 e e i 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 s - d r d < < < < < < < y 4 i P e s l l M i a c s n u y A n l

a m l n u a e A i c d

0 7 4 t i i

u 1 4 3 5 3 4 8 0 n 9 0 t l

c n n

3 1

1 1

9 1

5 5

6 o

r 8

9 i

r u a - a s r s n c o t r r C N G I B C Z C M C C S S S

R.

. 3 R.

N I&****..***.**

. )) ))

N. 27 20 O. 1 11 I.

T.

A.

C /- /-

11 33 O.

L.

1 O.

H (( ((

T 3 6 N.

O.

C 6 l. ********.***

7 )) ))

/ N 27 20 Y 1 . 1 R 3 O.

I 11 A /

M 2 2 T.

A M 0 1 C* /- /-

U 3 - O 11 33 S - 8 0 7 L. 1 M S / N.

A 1 A.

R . 0 E. (( ((

G O / M 3 6 O N 1 R 0 T.

P T S.

E D E.

G K O H N C I G .***..**.***

I O R I. 7 7 R D E . 4 4 O P H. C T

I G l.

.?**.C))* *.***

))

5 N N . 27 20 3 O I . 1 11 M T .

I R S.

N .

I L O O.

I A P I. / - /-

l eC I 3 R E T A

11 1

33 bG C.

aO T .

T L I O.

O N I U A L.

L.

((

3

((

6 D D L A R I A R E R .

V O .

L I L I4*.**.***.***

A R T F. O 6 N L Y O.

E A T L.

M T N L N S U O Y O 84*.**.***..**

R R C .

I V

N C

S U O.

4 2

E R N T 0S 0 9

. 9I 9 8 I

C /S - -

E. 9Y R R P 8L S S Y A T. RN

. SA .

I1************

Y. N A+ O W. )I H LT T.

A

/S KIE P* LCG IPN

. M(I

INGESTION ANIMAL PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze small terres-trial animals. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-36. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There are no critical sample stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table 111-37.

The operational concentrations for 1978 are lower than both the 1977 operational and the preoperational concentrations. Cesium-137 is the exception with the 1978 concentration approaching preoperational levels after being elevated in 1977 due to the Chinese weapons test fallout.

59

R*

R* 0 N*

l* ************************************** l 4

t*

0*

1* 4 4 4 4 T*

A* N N 4 f N C* M M M M O* U U U U L* L L L L

O O O O t* C C C C O*

R* E E E E T* E E E E N* S S S S O*

C* 9 8 l4**************** **********************

7 * )) )) )) ))

/ N* 23 21 24 20 Y 1 O* 7 5 9 2 R 3 I* 1 4 A / T* 2 M 2 2 A*

M 0 1 C* /- /- /- /-

U 3 - O* 25 25 23 20 S - 8 L* 4 1 9 6 0 7

7 M 5 / N* 1 A 1 A*

R . 0 E* (( (( (( ((

G O / M* 9 3 4 0 O N 1

5 3 4 9 R 0 T* 1 0 P T S* 2 E D E*

G K O H***************************************

N C I G*

I O R I* 5 5 5 5 R D E H* 4 4 4 4 6 O P

C C C C 3 T I G l*

)) )) )% ))

. 1 N N

23 21 24 20 1

1 O I

7 5 9 2 M T S* 1 4 e L 9 4 2

l O P

'r**

bA IS /- /- /- /-

T aC E T* 2S 2S 23 20 I 3 R Ae A I D D D 9 D D D 6 G C* N N N N N N 7 O T O* 1 I

L L*

O N * (( (( (( ((

I U A L* 9 3 4 0 D D L* 5 3 4 9 A R I A* 1 0 R E R

2 V O

L I A R L l*

T F.

5 3 8 4 6 2 1 6 4 9 N L Y D* 1 1 2 5 1 1 1 3

E A T L* 1 M T N L*

N S U

O Y O l* ***********************************e**

R R C

I C

2 V S .*

N U O*

E R N* 6 2 1 0 6 7 5 4 5 0 T

S 2 3 3 4 0 3 9 S 6 4 I C* I 2 2 1 1 1 1 C

S - - - - - - -

E* AY A H A U S R N N P* ML R T I S R. C Z M Z K Y* MA T* AN

GA l*

Y* N A* ) O W* SGI H* LKT T* A/S A* MIE n co P* ICG

NPN

A(I

4 Table 111-37

. INGESTION Ai41MALS PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 --

720 59.0 59.0 97.8 Th-232 -- --

33.0 33.0 82.9 I-131 <10 100 <3.8 <3.8 <4.4 Ba-140 <10 <10 <23.5 <23.5 <33.2 Ru-106 -- --

<55.5 <55.5 <101.2 Cs-137 <10 80 143.5 143.5 283.5 Zr-95 <10 70 <5.3 <5.3 <10.1 Mn-54 <80 (80 <3.0 <3.0 <5.8 Zn-65 <160 160 <G.8 <6.8 <10.2 K-40 1656.5 3586.6 2090.0 2090.0 3004.7 61

F000 CHAIN (GRASSES) PA7HWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze grass sampl es. There are no additional stations for this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The sunmary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual r:mples is in Table 111-38. Results for Stations C05 and C40 for the first half are not reported due to contamination by fallout from a Chinese weapons test. All other samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had annual aver-age LLDs equal to or less than those required. There are no critical sta-tions in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-39.

The 1978 operational concentrations are similar to the 1977 operational and preoperational concentrations.

62

R*

H* 0 N*

l*

- - - - e*e**********************

N*

O*

I* 4 4 4 4 4 4 T*

A* N N N N N N C* M M M M M M O* U U U U U U L* L L L L L L

O O O O O O h L* C C C C C C O*

H* E E E E E E T* E E E E E E N* S S S S S S O*

C*

8 7

l*

- - - - e*****e**********************

) ) ) ) ) ))

/ N* 1 1 2 1 1 20 Y 1 O* 2 R 3 I* 3 A / T* 6 M 2 2 A*

M 0 1 C* / / / / / / -

U 3 - O* 1 1 1 1 1 21 S - 8 L* 1 0 7

7 M 5 / N*

A 1 A*

R . 0 E* ( ( ( ( ( ((

G O / M* 9 7 2 1 S 6 O N 1

5 5 9 5 1 R 0 T* 3 2 5 P T S* 3 E D E*

G K O N C I H***************************************

G*

I O R I* 0 0 1 S 0 1 R D E H* 4 4 4 O 4 4 8 O P

C C C C C 3

I T

G l*

- - - - C

)) )) ) )

)) ) ))

1 N N

49 47 4 4 41 4 40 1 O 1

I

8 5 5 2 M T S* 3 2 3 e R N* 6 l L O O*

b A P I* / - / - / / /- / /-

T aC E T* 49 40 1 1 46 1 40 I

3 R A* 2 2 D 3 O D 4 G C* N N O T O* N 4 L I L*

O N * (( (( ( ( (( ( ((

I U A L* 2 1 2 D 6 S 0 D D L* S 2 9 L 3 7 A R I A* 1 L 1 0 R E R * <

V O

2 L I L l*

- - - - 4***************************

A R F

T .

7 4 8 6 7 0 3 7 5 7 N L Y D* 1 1 2 6 1 1 1 5

E A T L* 1 M T N L*

N S U

O Y O R R C l*

****************o*********************

I C

6 V S .*

N U O*

E R N* 6 2 1 0 6 7 5 4 5 0 T

S 2 3 3 4 0 3 9 5 6 4 I &* I 2 2 1 1 1 1 C

S - - - - - - - - - -

E* AY A H A U S R N N .

P* ML R T I B R C Z M Z K Y* MA T* AN

GA l*

****************e*********************

N Y* l A* ) A W* Gli H* KC T* S/

A* SID mw P* ACO

RPO

G(F

Table 111-39 FOOD CHAIN (GRASSES) PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 --

2363 44.5 51.8 107.5 Th-232 --

120 52.5 120.5 432.7 I-131 <10 <10 <2.5 <24.8 <112.6 Ba-140 26 253 <7.5 (13.1 <35.9 Ru-106 -- --

<18.3 <53.0 <191.5 Cs-137 1363 5416 128.5 136.0 314.4 Zr-95 <10 31 <3.0 <6.3 <19.0 Mn-54 -- --

<3.3 <4.5 <11.7 Zn-65 --

589 (4.0 < 7.5 <21.9 K-40 578.2 2430.2 759.5 2069.8 7631.8 64

INGESTION FOOD CR0PS (CITRUS) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze citrus samples.

There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Annual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the annual samples is in Table III-40. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There is no critical sample stations in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-40a.

The 1978 operational concentrations were non detectable as were the 1977 operational and the prt operational concentrations except for Cs-137.

Because this is an annual sample and Cs-137 was not found in 1977 or the preoperational data, this positive indication is considered to be spurious.

65

N*

I&*e**************e***********

N*

O*

I* 4 T*

A* N C* M O* U L* L

O L* C O*

R* E T* E N* S O*

C*

8 l4****e***e**************e****

7 * )

/ N* 1 Y 1 O*

R 3 I*

A / T*

M 2 2 A*

M 0 1 C* /

U 3 - O* 1 S - 8 L*

0 7

M 5 / N*

A 1 A*

R . 0 E* (

G O / M* 0 O N 1

7 R 0 T*

P T S*

E D E*

G K O I H*e***************************

N C G*

I O R I* 9 R D E H* 1 O P

C T

I G l*

- - - e***********************

)

J t N

1 O I

M T S*

R N*

0 L 4 A O O*

P I* /

I C E T* 1 I I 3 R A* D D D D D D D I G C* N N N N N N 4 f

l e OL T I O*

L*

b O NU A * (

aI L* O T D D L* 7 A R I A*

R E R

V O

L I L 1&********e8**4***************

A R

4 4 4 4 4 1 2 4 T F.

2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 N L Y D*

E A T L*

M T N L*

N S U

O Y O I4e***************************

R R C

I C

1 V S .*

N U O*

E R N* 1 0 8 7 4 4 5 0 T

S 3 4 5 3 3 5 6 6 I 6* I 1 1 1 1 C

S - - - - - - -

E* AY - A O S S N N O P* ML 1 O C C C M Z C Y* MA T* AN

GA

- l*

Y* N A* O W* )I H* SGT T* UKS A* R/E P* TIG

ICN

CPI

(

,nc

Table III-40a INGESTION FOOD CROPS (CITRUS) PATHWAY ANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg) nuclide Preoperational Values Operational Values Meaian 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile I-131 <10 <10 <12.0 <12.0 --

Ba-140 <10 <10 <12.0 <12.0 --

Co-58 <10 <10 <12.0 <12.0 --

Cs-137 (10 <10 70.0 70.0 --

Cs-134 <10 <10 <1?.0 <12.0 --

Mn-54 <10 <10 <10.5 <10.5 --

Zn-65 -- --

<21.0 <21.0 --

Co-60 <10 <10 <12.0 <12.0 --

66a

INGESTION F0]" CR0PS (WATERMELON) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze watermelon samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.

A ..ual Gam?a Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the annual samples is in Table 111-41. All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There is no critical sample station in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data is pre-sented in Table III-41a. There was no preoperational data for this pathway and all 1978 operational analyses resulted in nondetectable activity as did the 1977 operational analyses.

67 r

s A

- +s , , _, , , ,. ,,.- .

Table 111-41 y ,, ., E NVI R ONMENT AL R AD I OLO G I C AL MON IT OR ING PRO GR AM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORT ING PER IOD 31/01/78-12/31/78 PATHWAY TYPE & NO. LLD ALL LOC AT 1 HIGHE MEAta LOCATION I CONTROL LOCAT IN

- - - - l***************l*******l************ IONS ******4******ST*****************4*************** ION

- - 4e W ATERMELON * * * * * * *

(PCI/KG)

GAMMA * * * * *

INGESTION

ANAL Y SI S 1 * * * * * *

I- 131

24* ND * * * *

* *

e * *

SA-140

24* ND * * * *

CO- 58

24* ND * * * *

*

e * * *

CS-137

24* ND 4 * * *

, e * * * * * ,

w * * * *

e *

CS-134

244 ND * * * *

MN- 54

21* ND * * * *

ZN- 6S

42* ND * * * *

CO- 60

24* ND * * *

Table III-41a INGESTION FOOD CR0PS (WATERMELON) PATHWAY ANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Operational Values Mean 95 Percentile I-131 <12.0 --

Ba-140 <12.0 --

Co-58 <12.0 --

Cs-137 <12.0 --

Cs-134 <12.0 --

Mn-54 (12.0 --

Zn-65 <12.0 --

Co-60 <12.0 --

68a

FOOD CHAIN (S0ll) PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze soil samples.

There are no additional stations in this pathway. This pathway was sampled in 1978, even though it was not required, to show that sample LLDs could be met by improved techniques.

Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the annual samples is in Table 111-42. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There is no critical sample station in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data and a comparison with the preoperational data is presented in Table III-43.

The 1978 operational results are almost identical to the 1977 operational and the preoperational results.

69

Table III-42 E NVI R ONME NT AL R AD I OL O G I C AL MON ITOR ING PRO GR AM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RI VER UN I T 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CIT RUS COUNTY. FLORIDA REPORTING PERIOD 01/01/78-12/31/78 PATHWAY T YP E & NO. I LLD 1 ALL I H

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *l * * * * * * * * * * * * *

4 4 * * * *

4 * * * * *

L O C A T *****************************'s****'****4***

I O N S* * * * * * * * * * *

4 * * *I G H E S T MEAN L OC A SOIL * * * * * * *

( P C 1/K G )

GAMMA * * * * *

FOOD CHA IN

A NALY SI S 7 * * * * * *

RA-226

9* 372( 7/ 7)*C41

764( 1/ 1)* SEE COLUMf4 4 *

* * ( 88- 784)* * * *

TM-232

9* 102( 7/ 7) *C4 0

373( 1/ 1)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 41- 373)* * * *

I -131

4* NO * * *

OA-140

14* ND *

* * *

e *

RU-lO6

29* 3S( 4/ 7)*C04

41( 1/ 11* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 29- 41)* * * *

* * *

e *

-137

4* 128( 6/ 7) *C 04

325( 1/ 1)* SEE COLUMr4 4 *

* * ( 26- 325)* * * *

ZR-95

6* 4( 1/ 7)*C26

4( 1/ 1)* ECE CCLUMN 4 *

MN-54

36 2( 1/ 7)

C 04

2( 1/ 11* SEE COLUMN 4

e * * *

e e

ZN-65

7* ND * * * *

K -40

34* 154( 4/ 7)*C46

261( 1/ 1)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 71- 261)* * *

Table 111-43 FOOD CHAIN (SOIL) PATHWAY ANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)

Nuclide _reoperational Values Operational Values Median 95 Percentile Median Mean 95 Percentile Ra-226 --

2200 131.0 371.6 1012.3 Th-232 --

300 49.0 102.3 338.7 I-131 <10 <10 <2.0 <2.1 <3.5 Ba-140 <10 <10 < 5. 5 <6.8 <11.8 Ru-106 0 330 <29.0 <27.3 <47.9 Cs-137 270 1100 64.0 110.1 343.9 Zr-95 40 150 <3.5 <3.1 <5.5 Mn-54 <10 (10 <2.0 <1.6 <2.9 Zn-65 -- --

<2.5 <3.5 <6.3 K-40 713 1482 <71.0 <96.2 <286.9 e

71

FOOD CHAIN (MEAT) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze meat samples.

There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Semiannual Gamma Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-44. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There is no critical sample station in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table III-44a. There was no preoperational data for this pathway and all 1978 operational analyses resulted in nondetectable activity as did the 1977 operational analyses.

72

H*

R* 0 N*

l* ****************e***********

N*

O*

I*

T*

A*

C*

O*

L*

O*

H*

T*

N*

O*

C*

8 7

l*

/ N*

Y 1 O*

R 3 I*

A / T*

M 2 2 4 =:

M 0 1 C*

U 3 - O*

S - 8 L*

0 7

M 5 / N*

A 1 A*

R . 0 E*

G O / H*

O N 1

R 0 T*

P T S*

E D E*

G K O H*****************************

N C I G*

I O R I*

R D E H*

O P

T I G I4****************************

4N 4

N

O I

I M T S*

I R N*

I L O O*

A P I*

l eC E T*

b I 3 R A* D D D D D D D D aG C* N N N N N N N N TO T O*

L I L*

O N

I U A L*

D D L*

A R I A*

R E R

V O

L I L l4****************************

A R F, T

8 9 0 7 0 2 6 0 N L Y D* 3 3 6 3 6 3 6 6 E A T L*

M T N L*

N S U

O Y O l* ******4*********************

R R C

I C

2 V S .*

N U O*

E R N* 1 0 8 7 4 4 5 0 T

S 3 4 5 3 3 5 6 6 I &* I 1 1 1 1 C

S - - - - - - -

E* AY - A O S S N N D P* ML I D C C C M Z C Y* MA T* AN

GA l4****************************

N Y* I A* )A W* GH H* KC T* /

A* TlD P* ACO

EPO

M(F d

Table III-44a FOOD CHAIN (MEAT) PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Operational Values Mean 95 Percentile I-131 <19.0 <19.0 Ba-140 <19.3 <19.5 Co-58 <30.0 <30.0 Cs-137 <16.5 <16.5 Cs-134 <30.0 <30.0 Mn-54 <16.0 <16.0 Zn-65 <33.0 <33.0 Co-60 <30.0 < 30.0 73a

FOOD CHAIN (POULTRY) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze poultry samples.

There are no additional stations in this pathway.

Syniannual Gamm3 Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table 111-45. All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There is no critical sample station in this pathway. A statistical evaluation of the operational data is in Table III-45a. There is no preoperational data for this pathway.

The 1978 operational concentrations were non detectable as were the 1977 operational and the preoperational concentrations except for Cs-137 in the second half of 1978. This is considered spurious as Cs-137 has never been found in poultry before and there were no other detectable nuclides in the same sample.

74

R*

R* O N*

l* **********************4*****

N*

O*

I* 4 T*

A* N C* M O* U L* L

O L* C O*

R* E T* E N* S O*

C*

e 8 1b**************** ************

7 * )

/ N* 2 Y 1 O*

R 3 I*

A / T*

4 1 2 21 A*

N 0 C* r U 3 - O* 1 S - 8 L*

0 7

M 5 / N*

A 1 A*

R . 0 E* (

G O / M* 0 O N 1

7 R 0 T* 1 P T S*

E D E*

G K O I H*****************************

N C G*

I O R I* 9 5 R D E H* 4 4 O P

C 1

- T l* ****************************

1 I G * )

1 N N

2 O I

eM T S*

l b

R N*

aL O O*

T A P I* /

C E T* 1 I 3 D A* D D D D D D D G C* N N N N N N N O T O*

L I L*

O N * (

I U A L* 0 D D L* 7 A R I A* 1 R E R

V O

L I L l*

A R F.

T 8 9 0 7 0 2 6 0 N L Y D* 3 3 6 3 6 3 6 6 E A T L*

M T N L*

N S U

O Y O l*

R R C I C

2 V S .*

N U O*

E R N* 1 0 8 7 4 4 5 0 T

S 3 4 5 3 3 5 6 6 I &* I 1 1 1 1 C

S - - - - - - -

E* AY - A O S S N N O P* ML I B C C C M Z C Ye MA T4 AN

GA 6

l4****************************

N Y* I A* )A W* YGH H* RKC T* T/

A* lid P* UCO

OPO

P(F

N*

Table III-45a FOOD CHAIN (POULTRY) PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Operational Values Mean 95 Percentile I-131 <19.0 <19.0 Ba-140 <19.5 <19.5 Co-58 <30.0 <30.0 Cs-137 <94.3 <304.2 Cs-134 <30.0 <30.0 Mn-54 <16.0 <16.0 Zn-65 <33.0 <33.0 Co-60 <30.0 < 30.0 75a

g FOOD CHAIN (EGGS) PATHWAY The State has the responsibility to collect and analyze egg samples. There are no additional stations in this pathway.

S_emiannual Gamma Analysis The suranary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table 111-46. All samples were collected and analyzed and all had LLDs equal to or less than those required. There is no critical sample station in this pathway. A statistical evaluation cf the operational data is pre-sented in Table III-46a. There was no preoperational data for this pathway and all 1978 operational analyses resulted in nondetectable activity as did all 1977 operational analyses.

76

H*

64* 0 4*

t l* *******************e** ****

a*

t O*

I*

T*

A*

C*

O*

L*

O*

R*

T*

J t*

O*

C*

8 l* *******************e**! ****

7 4

/ t*

Y 1 O*

R 3 I*

A / T*

M 2 2 A*

M 0 1 C*

U 3 - O*

S - 8 L*

0 7

M 5 / N*

A 1 A*

R . 0 E*

G 0 4/ M*

O F 1

R 0 T*

P T S*

E D E*

G K O H************************ ****

J t C I G*

6i O R I*

4 H*

H D E 1 O P

1T l* *********************** ****

1I G

N N

e O I

l bM T R

S*

a N*

TL O O*

A P I*

C E T*

I 3 R A* D D D D D D D D G C* N N N N N N N N O T L I O.

t **

O N

I U A L*

D D L*

A R I A*

R E R

V O

L I L l* *********************** ****

A R

T F.

8 9 0 7 0 2 6 0 4

t L Y D* J 3 6 3 6 3 6 6 E A T L*

M T N L*

4 t S U 4 O Y O I4*********4************ i****

R R C

I C

2 V S .*

N J t O*

E R N* 1 0 8 7 4 4 5 0 T

S 3 4 5 3 3 5 6 6 I C* I 1 1 1 1 C

S - - - - - - -

E* AY - A O S S N N O P* ML I B C C C M Z C Y* MA T* AN

GA l* ********************** i****

N Y* I A* )A W* GH H* KC T* /

A* SID P* GCO

GPO N"

E(F

Table III-46a F000 CHAIN (EGGS) PATHWAY SEMIANNUAL GAMMA ANALYSIS (pCi/kg)

Nuclide Operational Values Mean 95 Percentile I-131 <19.0 <19.0 Ba-140 <19.5 <19.5 Co-58 <30.0 <30.0

~

Cs-137 <18.5 <18.5 Cs-134 <30.0 <30.0 Mn-54 <16.0 <16.0 Zn-65 <33.0 <33.0 Co-60 <30.0 <30.0 77a

FOOD CHAIN (GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES) PATHWAY The University has the responsibility to collect and analyze green leafy vegetable samples. There are no additional stations in this pa+hway. Five additional samples were collected at each station as part of the Enhanced Sampling Program for the gamma analysis.

Semiannual Gama Analysis The summary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table 111-47. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs that were equal to or less than those required. The critical station for this type of analysis (Sample Station C48) is in the east sector at 4.5 miles from the plant. A statistical evaluation of the operational data is presented in Table 111-48. There is no preeperational data for this pathway.

The 1978 operational concentrations are similar to the 1977 operational concentrations.

Semiannual Sr-90 Analysis The sumary for the gamma analysis of the semiannual samples is in Table III-49. All samples were collected and analyzed and all nuclides had LLDs that were equal to or less than those required. There is no critical station for this type of analysis. A statistical evaluation of the opera-tional data is presented in Table 111-48. There is no preoperational data for this pathway and the 1977 operational data showed no detectable activ-ity. The 1978 samples showed no detectable activity but the first half samples collected subsequent to the fallout from a Chinese weapons test.

This is probably the cause for the higher than normal activity.

78

R*

R* O N*

l* ***************************************

)) )) ) ) ) )) ) ))

N* 62 66 6 6 6 61 6 60 O* 6 6 4 8 I* 1 7 T* 3 A*

C* /- /- / / / /- / /-

O* 64 60 1 1 1 66 O 60 L* 3 2 8

7 L* 1 O*

R* (( (( ( ( ( (( ( ((

T* 3 5 6 O 2 6 O 8 N* 4 9 2 6 1 9 O* 5 C* 2 8 l* *****************^****e****************

7 * )) )) ) ) ) )) ) ))

/ N* 78 66 6 7 6 70 7 60 Y 1 O* 4 6 7 8 R 3 I* 1 1 0 7 A / T* 2 3 M 2 2 A*

M 0 1 C* /- / - / / / /- / /-

U 3 - O* 74 60 1 1 1 77 1 60 S - 8 L* 3 2 7 8 0 7

7 M 5 / N* 1 A 1 A*

R . 0 E* (( (( ( ( ( (( ( ((

G O / M* 1 5 6 1 2 6 8 8 O N 1

6 9 2 6 5 9 R 0 T* 6 5 P T S* 2 E D E*

G K O No***************************************

7N C I G*

4I O R I* 8 7 7 8 7 8 8 7 I

R D E N* 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 I O P

C C C C C C C C I T I G l*

)) )) ) )) ) )) ) ))

eN N

38 36 3 31 3 30 3 30 b O

l I 14 16 1 12 1 17 1 13 a M T S* 1 1 0 2 T R N* 2 4 L O O*

A P I* /- /- / / - / /- / /-

C E T* 34 20 1 20 1 36 1 33 I 3 R A* 13 12 2 1 D D 10 G C* N N 5 O T O* 1 L I L*

O N * (( (( ( (( ( (( ( ((

I U A L* 2 2 6 1 2 0 8 8 D D L* S 6 2 6 6 3 A R I A* 3 4 R E R

2 V O

L I A R F L l*

- - - - e****************

T .

7 5 0 0 9 9 2 7 7 2 N L Y D* 1 1 2 4 5 1 1 4 E A T L* 1 M T N L*

N S U

O Y O R R C l*

I C

4 V S .* 2 N U O*

E R N* 6 2 0 6 7 T

S 2 3 1 4 0 3 5 4 5 I 6* I 2 2 3 1 1 1 9 5 6 0 C

S - - 1 - - - - - - 4 E* AY A N - A U S R N N -

P* ML R T I B R C Z M Z K Y* MA T* AN

GA l*

E

V

F Y* A A* E W* L)

N* L T* N/

A* E1 P* EC

RP ye

G(

s ne ol i i t t a n t e S c 2 1 3 3 1 5 0 0 7 4 r . . . . . -

l e 9 4 0 7 1 2 3 4 4 5 -

a P 3 7 4 6 2 6 2 1 3 8 c 1 < < < 1 2 < < < 0 i 5 < 2 4 t 9 i

r C

Y )

g n

A a 9 7 6 7 7 9 6 0 3 0 W k e -

H / M 0 6 0 4 6 5 7 4 0 1 -

T i 6 3 1 2 3 5 < < 1 0 A C < < < < 6 < 3 P p 2

(

) s S S s n e E E e o l L S u i i B Y l t t A L a a n T A V t e 8 E !

S c 9 5 8 9 3 3 8 4 7 8 4 G A l r -

- E a l e 3 3 2 8 1 1 6 3 7 2 -

1 V F n o P 6 9 4 5 6 4 < < < 1 1 O o r 1 < < < 0 1 Y i t 5 4 F N t n 9 e A O a o l E I r C b L T e a A p n T N U O a 7 5 0 0 0 5 4 5 1 3 E L e . . . -

E A M 2 4 0 9 7 5 4 2 6 8 - n R V 4 9 1 1 2 1 < < < 9 o G E < < < 5 i

( e 2 t L l a N A i t I C t s A I n H T e l C S c 5 1 2 1 7 9 6 5 2 8 6 a

! r . . . c D T e 2 4 0 2 6 9 7 0 6 4 4 i O A P 1 5 4 6 9 6 1 1 2 2 5 t O T 1 1 < < < 6 < < < 0 i F S 5 < 1 4 r 9 c r

n o f

a 5 4 3 1 2 3 1 3 3 2 3 e . . s . s M 2 3 0 2 2 0 6 3 8 3 i 6 e 5 6 1 2 3 6 < < < 3 s 1 d

, < < < < 3 4 y i s 2 l l i a c s n u y A n l

a m l n u a e A i c d 5 2

0 6 7 t i i a 2 3 1 4 0 3 5 4 5 n 0 t l m 2 2 3 1 1 1 9 5 6 0 o 9 i c m - - 1 - - - - - - 4 r - r u a a h - a u s r n n - t r C N G R T 1 B R C Z M Z K S S

8

R*

R* 0 N*

l* ********

N*

O*

I* 4 T*

A* N C* M O* U L* L

O L* C O*

R* E T* E N* S O*

C*

8 I* ********

7 * ))

/ N* 22 Y 1 O* 4 R 3 I*

A / T* ,

M 2 2 A*

M 0 1 C* /-

U 3 - O* 21 S - 8 L*

0 7

M 5 / N*

A 1 A*

R . 0 E* ((

G O / M* 2 O N 1

2 R 0 T*

P T S*

E D E*

G K O H*********

N C I G*

9I O R I* 8 4

R D E H* 4 l O P 6 C l T I4********

I I G * ))

N e O N

42 l

I

4 bM T S*

a R N*

TL O O*

A P I* / -

C E T* 41 I 3 R A*

G C*

O T O*

L I L*

O N * ((

I U A L* 6 D D L* 1 A R I A*

R E R

V O

L I L l* ********

A R F

T ,

1 N L Y D*

E A T L*

M T N L*

N S U 4 O Y O I4********

R R C

I C

4 V S .*

N U O*

E R N*

T

S 0 I G* I 9 C

S -

E* 0Y R P* 9L S Y* A T* RN

SA l* ********

N Y* I A* A W* G H H* EGC T* K A* V. / D P*

IO L. C O

GPF

g IV. EXTERNAL RADIATI0'!

d The External Radiation portion of the Radiological Enviror mental Monitoring Prograin (Specification 3.2.3) is split between the University and the State (See Table I-1). The University also has a TLD at Sample Station C47 and the State has additional TLDs at Sample Stations C04, C40, and C46. The summaries for the University's data is in Table IV-1 and for the State's data in Table IV-2. i3ecause of vandalism, the University's TLDs at Sample Station C04 were lost and because of construction, those at C43 were lost for the third quarter. No other TLDs were lost during the report period.

Sample Stations C14H, Cl4M, and C14G are the critical stations in this pathway.

Table IV-3 presents a statistical sumary of all data. ine 1978 data from all TLD stations compares very well with the 1977 data and the preopera-tional data. Additionally, the critical stations and the control stations of the University also compare very well. However, because the University and the State use different types of TLDs, it is necessary to report their results separately.

82

e R,

R O Nu l n***u***R e ))

l t v 40 O* 27 I* -

Tt A*

C* /-

O* 42 Ln 22 e

Ls c O*

R2 ((

Tc J

6 t n 4 O*

C*

8 i*GL*tu**4 .

7 * ))

/ N* 46 Y 1 O* 6 R 3 I*

A / T*

1 t 2 2 S.

M 0 1 C* /-

U 3 - On 43 E - 8 L* 5 0 7

1 t 5 / N*

A 1 A*

R 0 E*

1

((

G O / T

9 O N 1

5 R 0 Tt P T Sa E D E.

G K O i* h ***

l **k J

t C I Cn I O R Ie 7 R D E He 4 1O P

C -

T :**A *k**=l i V ! G * ))

I t r

l t

60 eo l SL 37 l M T b R N&

TaL O Ot A F

- I = / -

C E Tn 62 I 3 R A* 32 .

G C*

O I O*

L 1 L*

O 1 r * ((

I U A L* 7 D D L* 4 A R I A*

R E R

V O

L I L l*kk**u*u5 A R F

T ,

N l Y De 5 E A T La 1 M T N Lt t

t S U u O Y O e*****unk R R C a 6 I C a 3 V S .n N U O*

E R N* N T

LO I &* AI C

JT I

Ew RA Pu EI Yw lD I

- 5 XA

ER l

n*******k

N

O

I

S)

Y* RR F A* EY J

t 1/

t F iHu Ut1 O T* UE A2 SR U P* M

R(

I DJ CG

A

Table IV-2 ENVI ROtlNEtt f AL R AD I OL OG I C Al. fintil f 0R IrlO PROGRArt SUr1t1ARY CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO S0-302 CITflUS COUNfY, FLORIDA REf' ORT IriC PEllIOD 01/01/78-12/31/78 PATHWAY : TYPE 8< NO. : LLD : ALL LOCATIOtJ5

HIGliES~l r1EAN LOCATION : CONTROL LOCATIOra INRR

* * * *

n * * * * * * * * * * * < * * * * *

r * * *

x e t v e

a sc e * * * * * * * *

r a s u L. * * * *

e *

i, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * - c .

e e m i a a

k E t h k A AIR SUf1MERSION *

u o a a (MREM /YR) *

u o

x

*

t

t h STATE

EXTERNAL *

K u r *

RADIATION 28* 20

38( 28/ 28)*C26

49( 4/ 4)* SEE COLUMN 4 *

* * ( 26- 54)e * ( 3S- 54)e *

*

e * *

CO Sm

Table IV-3 EXTERNAL RADIATION PATHWAY QUARTERLY TLD ANALYSIS (mrem /yr)

Median Mean 95 Percentile Value Value Value ,

62 77 Preoperational --

All Stations 44 42.5 65.9 State 35 35.8 59.9 University (All Stations) 48 47.9 65.5 University (Critical Stations) 48 48.0 60.3 University (Control Stations) 48 47.8 47.E k b 85 M -

ML19261C758

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML19261C758

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search