ML19254B354

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 790618-21
ML19254B354
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/11/1979
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML19254B347 List:
References
50-413-79-12, 50-414-79-12, NUDOCS 7909270358
Download: ML19254B354 (1)


Text

.

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Power Company License Nos. CPPR-116 Catawba Nuclear Plant

& CPPR-117 Based on the NRC inspection June 18-21, 1979, certain of your activities were apparently not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as indicated below. These items have been categorized as described in correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.

As required by Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 and as implemented by Topical Report, Duke IA, paragraph 17.1.5, appropriate instructions will be used for activities affecting quality. The Quality Assurance Program (QAP)

Procedure P-1, " Receiving Inspection", requires that vendor records be reviewed and accepted by the Quality Assurance Department project staff.

The acceptance of vendor records is indicated by a verification signature on Form PI-A, " Receiving Inspection Report", in the "QA Records Acceptable" block.

Contrary to the above, the following are two examples where the instructions of QAP Procedure P-1 were not followed.

1.

Purchase requisition number (PRN) 8337-1354.01-00-0014 required cabit to be in accordance with Duke Power Company specification (DPC Spec.'

CNS-1354.01-00-0001. Nine of the Forms 930.1, " Vendor Quality Assurance Certification", contained errors from the vendor.

The nine forms certified cable conformance to DPC Spec. CNS-1354.01-00-0003 instead of Spec. CNS-1354.01-00-0001.

This error was not detected by the project QA staff and the Form P-1A's were signed off as acceptable.

2.

The "Q.A.

Records Acceptable" block on a Form P-1A for five cable reels purchased per PRN 1354.01-00-0014 was signed by a site QA engineer instead of the project QA staff. The licensee identified the site QA engineer's signature as a co-signature which allowed release of the cable for issue. Neither the co-signature nor the method used for release of cable for issue are recognized by QAP Procedure P-1.

This is a deficiency.

7909270357$

i046 ggy

.