ML19225C780

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER 79-044/03L-0 on 790704:while Loading Fuel Assemblies Into Reactor Vessel,Determined That Source Range Monitors Functional Test Had Not Been Performed Prior to Fuel Loading.Test Immediately Performed.Caused by Review Delay
ML19225C780
Person / Time
Site: Hatch Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/26/1979
From: Coggin C
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19225C778 List:
References
LER-79-044-03L, LER-79-44-3L, NUDOCS 7908020434
Download: ML19225C780 (1)


Text

NRC FORM 366 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7 77)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQU: RED INFORMATION)

CONTROL block: l 1

l l l l l lh 6

2 i IGlAlEIIlH 1l@l0101-l010l010l0l-l010l@l4l1l1 14 LICENSE NuusEd .6 ;th L11 CEwt 11 TYPE l@lJJ l

St LA r $4 lg 4 $ LICENSEE CCCE 4 C O N'T aii "'l*C CU E l L }@l 015 l010 l0 l3 l 2 l1 od l@l017 69 I0 l417 l9 l@l0 EVENT OATE 14 .S l 712 I 6 I 7 l 9j@

REPCRT DATE 80 8 60 61 COCKET NLM9ga EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CCNSEQUENCES h al2 l With the reactor mode switch in refuel and while loading fuel assemblies into the I o a 1 reactor vessel it was determined that a SRM functional test had not been performed l

') 4 l Drior to fuel loading as required by Tech Spec 4.10.C. Fuel loading was immediately i o s stopped and the functional test was performed. No consequences were realized from g a ej! the event and it is not a repetitive occurrence. l o 7 I i

  • SS" TCTe' s$s*CTEE CCuRON E NT COCe su'si"/CE ssCPCE o a s

11101@ 101@ IX l@ l ZI Zi Zl ZI ZI Zl@ I Z@I Z i@

9 10 11 12 13 18 15 i

20

, SEQUEN TI AL CCCU R R ENCE REPCRT R E Vl51C N L EVENT YEAR REPORT NO. CODE TYPE NO.

@ ,a=E R i R O 9]

l21 71 l-l 10 l4 14 l l/l Qly lL I l-l l01 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 7K N AC CN PLANT  !ET HCURS S8 iT O FOR d 8. $L PP LI E MANUF4C RER IXl@lGl@

23 34 l35Z l@ l24 Zl@ l010i010l 34 40

[fij@ lNl@ lZ l@ lZl919l9l@

41 42 43 44 .7 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CC ARECTIVE ACTICNS

' i o 1 The functional test was not cerforned as recuired becaus<. no orocedure required it. 1 i . l This occurred because orocedure reviews had not been comoleted for amendment 66 to the t i 2 I technical saecifications. The omission would have been detected during the normal l i 3 I course of reviews. Procedure revisions have been submitted to require this test priorj 1

da Iato cara alterations. ao I

ST  % POWER OTH E R STATUS SO RY OISCOVERY CESCRiPTION i s

[3J@ l 0 l 0 l 0 l@l N/A l L3J@l Procedures Review I AbVtTV CON TENT AMOUNT CF ACTIVITY LOCATICN CF RELA,.

' 6 nELE 3 3 LZJ ASEOdF mELE 10 tt ASEtzj@l N/A 44 I L AS N/A 30 I

PERSCNNEL EltPOOLRES

  • NU9SER TYPE DESCRIPT1CN i l7 l nl o f 0 1@l Zl@l N/A . I PERSONNE L .NJLR E S NUveER C ESCm P TICN

'1 4 InioIoi@l'2 N/A 70080204 W 4 7 11 do LO*S OF CP O AVAGE TO F ACILITY j

[) } f' y' TvPE O E LC RIP floN .u n j _ gm)M W@l 3 N/A S 3 'O 30

,$st g 3 E SCR*PfiGN

  • lad L3)(dJ 'O N/A i G8 Gd QI1lti;iiIiI-10 3 o

NacE e, PneRaneR C. L. Cocain, Suot. P1t. Eng. Serv. ,, 912-367-77S1