ML19030A654
| ML19030A654 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinch River |
| Issue date: | 01/18/2019 |
| From: | James Shea Tennessee Valley Authority |
| To: | Office of New Reactors |
| Fetter A | |
| References | |
| TVACLINCHRIVERESP, TVACLINCHRIVERESP.SUBMISSION.6, CRN.P.PART08, CRN.P.PART08.2 | |
| Download: ML19030A654 (49) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:APPENDIX 8.2- SPT Energy Measurements Reports No Change for Rev. 4 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-1 of 168
Prepared By/Date: l/ b-t/(4=" Checked By/Date: s~ I I lg/u., TABLE 8.2*1
SUMMARY
OF SPT ENERGY TESTING RESULTS CLINCH RIVER SMR PROJECT OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE AMEC PROJECT NO. 6468*13-1072 R308 George Akins M&W 89.4 MW2 Dietrich 27 Gary Akins M&W 94.7 MW01 D-120 (1) Initial testing, June 5, 2013; test result after remobilization on September 30, 2013 was 81.9% AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, INC. Page 1 of 1 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-2 of 168
MEMORANDUM DATE: March 6, 2014 FROM: J. Allan Tice-Technical Lead
SUBJECT:
SPT Energy Reports, Revision 1 TO: Project Record Control File COPY TO: Steve Criscenzo Energy measurements of the SPT were made for each drill rig doing soil sampling at the Clinch River SMR site. The reports were accepted for use on the project by AMEC and assigned a record control number of CRP-1215.0. Based on review comments from Bechtel, minor revisions were r,equired in two of the eight reports. The revisions have been reviewed for completeness by a Technical Lead are accepted for use. CRP-1215.0 has been updated to incorporate the two revised reports designated by CRP-1215.1. Technical Lead Signature
~,All.
----z?L~~~~----~~--'----
!J t :s *- ro "' 1 1-- __
_________________oare: ______________ J. Allan Tice Technical Lead AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100 Durham, North Carolina 27703 Tel (919) 381 -9900 Fax (919) 381-9901 www.amec.com RCN: CRP-1219.0 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 1 of 1 Page 8.2-3 of 168
I 25 February 2014 Mr. Steve Criscenzo AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 4021 Stirrup Creek Drive Suite 100 Durham, North Carolina 27703
Subject:
Report of SPT Hammer Energy Measurements, Rev. 1 Premier CME 750X Drill Rig Rig Serial No. 323438 Automatic Hammer Clinch River SMR Site AMEC Project No. 6468-13-1072 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC) is pleased to present the results of Standard Penetration Test (SPT) hammer energy measurements for the subject drill rig at the Clinch River SMR site in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This report summarizes the field testing activities and presents the results of the hammer energy measurements. SPT Hammer Energy Field Measurements Initial SPT energy measurements were made at the referenced site on June 5, 2013. Additional energy measurements were also made on September 30, 2013 following are-mobilization of the drill rig to the subject site. Separate borings from the planned exploratory borings were used for the testing (test hole #1 near MET Tower on June 5 and test hole near #MP-28 on September 30). Per an approved deviation request, testing was performed at depths shallower than those recommended in ASTM D4633-10 due to the presence of relatively shallow rock at the site. The testing was performed by Michael Hamilton, an AMEC representative, from approximately 9AM to 11AM on June 5 and from approximately 2PM to 3PM on September 30 under partly cloudy skies and a temperature of approximately 80 degrees Fahrenheit. The boring was drilled with personnel and equipment from Premier Drilling. The drilling equipment consisted of a CME ?SOX drill rig with an automatic SPT hammer. The drilling tools consisted of AW-J sized drilling rods and a 2-foot long split tube sampler. The drill rig operator during sampling was Larry Carter. Energy measurements were recorded during sampling at the depth intervals shown in Table 1. The energy measurements were performed with a SPT Analyzer (Serial No.3622L) with SPT Analyzer software, accelerometers (Serial Nos. K3370, K0686 and K3731) and strain gages (Serial Nos. 75 AW-1 and 75 AW-2 on June 5 and 144 AW-1 and 144 AW-2 on September 30). A steel drill rod, 2 feet long and instrumented with dedicated strain gages, was inserted at the top of the drill rod string immediately below the SPT hammer Correspondence: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 2801 Yorkmont Road Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28208 Tel (704) 357-8600 Fax (704) 357-8638 arnec.com Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-4 of 168 Page 1 of 165
SPT Energy Measurements- Premier CME 750X Drill Rig February 25, 2014 AMEC Project No. 6468-13-1072 Page2 anvil. The inserted rod was also instrumented with two piezoresistive accelerometers that were bolted to the outside of the rod. The instrumented rod insert had a cross-sectional area of approximately 1.20 square inches and an outside diameter of approximately 1. 75 inches at the gage location. The drill rods included in the drill rod string were hollow rods in 5- to 10-foot long sections, with outside and inside diameters of approximately 1. 75 and 1.375 inches, respectively. Due to the closed hammer system, the hammer lubrication condition could not be observed. Calibration Records The calibration records for the equipment associated with this testing are filed in the project record control center. The calibration services were procured and approved in accordance with the commercial grade dedication process as outlined in AMEC's nuclear quality assurance program. Calculations for EFV The work was performed in accordance with ASTM D 4633-10. The strain and acceleration signals were converted to force and velocity by the PDA. The maximum energy transmitted to the drill rod string (EFV), as measured at the location of the strain gages and accelerometers, was calculated by the SPT Analyzer using the equation shown below: EFV =f F(t)
- V(t)
- dt Where: EFV =Transferred energy (EFV equation), or Energy of FV F(t) = Calculated force at timet V(t) =Calculated velocity at time t As recommended by ASTM D 4633-10, the force-velocity method of energy calculation was used. The equation shown above for calculating EFV, integrated over the complete wave event, measures the total energy of the event using both force and velocity measurements. The EFV values associated with each blow analyzed are tabulated in the attached PDIPLOT tables and are also shown graphically in the PDIPLOT charts.
Calculations for ETR The ratio of the measured transferred energy (EFV) to the theoretical potential energy of the SPT system (140 lb weight with the specified 30 inch fall) is the ETR. The ETR values (as a percentage of the theoretical value) are shown in Table 1. Comparison of ETR to Typical Energy Transfer Ratio Range Based on a research report published by the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) (Report WPI No. 0510859, 1999), the average ETR measured for automatic hammers was 79.6%. The standard deviation was 7.9%; therefore, the range of ETRs within one standard deviation of the average was reported to be 71.7% to 87.5%. This range of ETRs was also consistent with other research that was cited in the FOOT research paper; however, maximum and minimum ETR values of up to 98% and 56%, Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-5 of 168 Page 2 of 165
SPT Energy Measurements- Premier CME 750X Drill Rig February 25, 2014 AMEC Project No. 6468-13-1072 Page3 respectively, were reported in the literature. The ETR values shown in Table 1 are within the range of typical values for automatic hammers as reported in the literature. Evaluation and Conclusions Based on the field testing results, our evaluation and conclusions from the SPT energy measurements are summarized below:
- The average energy transferred from the hammer to the drill rods for each individual depth interval ranged from 307 foot-pounds to 313 foot-pounds on June 5 and from 281 to 297 foot-pounds on September 30. These average energy transfers correspond to energy transfer ratios (ETR) of 88% to 89% (June 5) and 80% to 85% (September 30) of the theoretical energy (350 foot-pounds) of the SPT hammer.
- The average at each depth interval was calculated as the transferred energy for each analyzed blow at the depth interval divided by the total number of hammer blows analyzed. The overall average energy transfer of the SPT system (for all the depth intervals tested) was 308.3 foot-pounds, with an average ETR of 88.1% for the testing on June 5 and was 286.7 foot-pounds with an average ETR of 81.9% for the testing on September 30.
Closing Please contact us when we can be of further service or if you have any questions concerning this report. Sincerely, MJJ1# - Sg{JPE AMEC EnvJt:;;E;*tructure, Inc. Mike Hamilton , E.I.T. Technical Professional Principal Geotechnical Engineer Attachments: Page 4- Table 1 -Summary of SPT Energy Measurements -1 Page Pages 5 Records of SPT Energy Measurement - 2 Pages Pages 7 PDIPLOT Output- 22 Pages Page 29- Example Force Velocity Plot- 1 Page Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN : CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-6 of 168 Page 3 of 165
TABLEt "'C(") ~=
SUMMARY
OF SPT ENERGY MEASUREMENTS {ASTM D4633-10) t1) ~ m:T Premier SPT Energy Measurements N;u Oak Ridge, Tennessee ~ ;::* 0 !!l AMEC Project No. 6468-13-1072 -c ... Ill a.- COli> -g '0 0 0: ~
~
~ '0 0 0 ~ '0~
> ~a-
"'C :.. ~ >. ~~
Q) ~ :E..-. ~ ~ 0 ..o- '0 ~ '-" "2 :; Q)
~ ,... Cl) Q) .... "'
Col ~
<I) c
....0 ~
"'Col ~ OJ) .,
~ C)
;u "'0 :0: ~ -
= .c e: :e ,-.
- 1
= 0 Col d.) ... fll en'0 t1) ~ ;j,) <= "' I:)J) 0 c.
C) 6 .5 'lo:< C) ..0 0:
~ z~ 0 c. ~ ;> I" 0:
= :..
Q ~ ~
~ - I:)J) 0.0 0 z bJ) t.
~
~ u
~ 0 Col<<!:::
... Col C) *;;; OJ) '-" '-"
(") -~ 2 0.0 CIS ~ ~
;u 2 0 ...
~ *~ Q c.
~ - Col ....as * .:>
rl'.l ~ c. 0 ~ ~ ~--- 7' 0
*-r.S E :..
.... I:)J) ~ CIS
.... ~ 0 <> C)
.... rl'.l ~ '$.
2 c.. z;
....a>~ rl'.l ~
=
~-
3.5-5.0 3-6-9 15 307 87.7% I I I 5.0-6.5 8-9-11 20 303 86.6% Test hole #1 6.5-8.0 7-11-14 I 25 I 313 I 89.4% (near MET I 6/5/2013 AW-J tower) 8.0-9.5 8-8-12 I 20 I 309 I 88.3% 9.5-11.0 12-16-11 I 27 I 308 I 88.0% L AveraKeforJune 5 Testinf{: I 308.3 I 88.1% Premier 5.0-6.5 I 4-4-8 I 12 I 297 I 84.9% CM 750X I Larry Carter Drilling 9.0-10.5 I 3-8-12 I 20 I 288 I 82.3% I 12.0-13.5 I 14-13-16 I 29 I 288 I 82.3% Test hole near MP-28 19/30/2013 AW-J 13.5-15 I 8-11-9 I 20 I 288 I 82.3% 15-16.5 I 10-12-11 I 23 I 283 I 80.9% 16.5-18.0 I 11-12-11 I 23 I 281 I 80.3% Averaf{e for September 30 Testing: I 286.7 I 81.9% I . Average for Ri~:l- ___1_9_6.6 I 84.7% -] aMeasured Energy is energy based on the EFV method, as outlined in ASTM 04633-10, for each blow recorded by the PDA. Only blows used to calculate N-values were considered per ASTM 04633-10. In some cases, the initial and/or final one to two blows produced poor quality data, and were not used to calculate the Average Measured Energy.
- u EFV = EMX
- 1000 lbsfk.ip, where EMX equals the transferred energy measured by the PDA (see attached PDA data).
0
-u:Z ~nergy Transfer Ratio is the Measured Energy divided by the theoretical SPT energy of 350 foot-pounds (140 pound hammer falling 2.5 feet).
~0 CD ::U The average EFV and ETR values may differ slightly and insignificantly from those in the PDIPLOT tables due to roundoff.
.~:-"?
0 ~
-(\.) ~~
mUl Prepared By: ~~ Date: Checked By: g_ Date: I- t o~ ' ~ Ul~
' i/( 2801 YORKMONT ROAD, SUITE 100
- CHARLOTTE, NC 28208 amecfi Telephone: (704) 357-8600 I Facsimile: (704) 357-8638 RECORD OF SPT ENERGY MEASUREMENT- ASTM 04633 -10 GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: Ll ,"11ch 'e. :ve.r S'JYIIZ DATE: (b -- !\ -13 PROJECT NO.: &i-t[t/t; ~ IJ- j ~ 7'2. INSPECTOR: m~:t-1 LOCATION: f/J£1. T. *.uei ~~r h;}J.o .:1.- WEATHER: P~rl-1{4 Nor:.rlrA I -;to<> r-u- rr*
BORING AND DRILL RIG DATA BORING NUMBER: ,-~ .J- h.b l f>. ~fi;.1- DRILLING COMPANY: .rVrY.m>'r.v RIG OPERATOR: I a.ri'<A f~rf--tf DRILL RIG MAKE: ' ern ~ t'] 5D HAMMER OPERATOR: :S.,~ h.~ 7-..o-:'J<.P { DRILL RIG MODEL: C..ll1k ~ X PAK SERIAL NO. : 3622L RIG SERIAL NO.: ~~34 ~-K (u/o<;?,) INSTR. ROD AREA: '.'JJ Ill_'l.
. HAMMER TYPE: Automatic ACCEL. SERIAL NOS.: A3: k ~~JU) A4: 1K l'>uf-flfl ROPE CONDITION : N/A STRAIN SERIAL NOS.: F3: AtJ *l-;75 -J F4: JT-\t,t>- ?6.. -z.* NO. OF SHEAVES: N/A SPT OBSERVATION ROD ROD SAMPLE SPT
\
\
' OR SIZE LENGTH DEPTH N-VALUE COMMENTS SPT OAT A RECORD (AW.:J, NW, etc) (feet) (feet) (bpf)
*.::,f )) DaliA t2-PnK' 1 Aw-=r q1c? 1-1*£]; 1 -u- 1 t. x-,s J'..-&>Prf
' 5" lo. "3 (1p ..$ tJ< .... Cf- If fLJ~'?O c--{?~.1 I 1. . c)
(1..5-
- 1) I) - II - I Lf .V:: Q. ~ Go~ .. 4
/'3, J) ~-q~s OJ, ~; --/ I i ~ -g - 17 }0:: ?c. ('yo~>~
f?£AIJ.'cl
/.6tf) !1_- /((, -- II v: J.l (rr;,~
REMARKS 5:j)T 1/u-sh:>() Q_ .1. ,s ~01~0'7135 Form 4633 REV.2 (11-4-11) CHECKED BY: DATE: Clinch ~iver Data Reporuf eq[.f1l ~~r'fyf£ f~r Use on Clinch Rivt;Jr SMR Project by J. A. Tice, TL R'CN : CRP-1215.1
- Page 8.2-8 of 168 Page 5 of 165
2801 YORKMONT ROAD, SUITE 100
- CHARLOTTE, NC 28208 amerP Telephone: (704) 357-8600 I Facsimile: (704) 357-8638 RECORD. OF SPT ENERGY MEASUREMENT .. ASTM 04633 .. 10 GENERAL INFORMATTON PROJECT NAME: t/1/l /' /;} K-/u.{[_ 2/'HIZ. DATE: q-:~tJ. -13 ' ;
PROJECT NO.; jj lf/~~ ., j~ -10? '/.. INSPE:CTOR: 'At!. lltt-JvJJ lkJ/J LOCATION: .. WEATHER: p,* jj~{,),. . Ju v
/r BORING AND DRILL RIG DATA BORING NUMBER: if:t'lf1"/H) ft. ( /Jt p -22 J DRILLING CO~PANY: . l.Jc--//lb'JO' y-.
RIG OPERATOR: Ct:u:IIA ()AI rfr DRILL RIG MAKE: ~ Clfll: i HAMMER OPERATOR: .'"Jhh .,u "f2oSSPr- . DR~LL RIG MODEL: h5DJt I PAK SE'RIALNO.: 39'22l RIG SERIAL NO.: 32'5Lf~X' I i' INSTR. ROD AREA: /, 7fl) //J 1. HAMMER TYPE: Automatic"
- I . . ACCEL. SERIAL NOS.:* ~3: rttLftw *t ~4:141./Aw .. z ROPE CONDITION: N/A
,I STRAfN SERIAL NOS*.: F3: I tc.~7~D '-}F4: I ~ OC/Ofl ~ fNO.. OF SHI:AVES: N/A ..
I I .SPT OBSERVATION ROD ROD SAMPLE SPT
~
OR SIZE
- LENGTH DEPTH N-VALUE COMMENTS
. \ SPT DATA RECORD (AW-J , NW, etc) (feet) (feet). 'bpf) j j
.iSDf_j)ofa Tleco*d Atr ... -:l 01 s-u,~ l-f - Lj..: 1if () <Xb~ *(
' v(j)f) 6.,;;
I
\
~
q-/o.r; ~.- 6-17 I fl.-J ()!(:; .
/{p /b.~- 12 Is- IY, fu 1 1~ r)ffl{'1~
I:.. 1'6' /1-r~.~ !1'1, ~~- {0 ;)_q - G-o11_J
}1. J1, b~ I.S ;;r q f.',_s'J-Nr:kns ..J .1o *(r(X)cl J.D . *.Q '3 G-oa-J *:. ;
I .
,_, ~5 - (,,:=)
tu~ -1~
/0 ~ )'2.-if
(! -11.-/r ;1~ G-lb.,.of I I * ' REMAR~ W t *C(
~ dtu ~ Pl3151 Form 4633 REV:2.(11-4-11) . -t! .J/
PREPARED BY:Plt_-.f/U1W' I V"' 1 CHECKED BY:
. DATE: ~")a -t3 . DATE:
~C.'Ii-' C/-.f- 0 t0 t IJ_
Form Approved for Use on Clinch River SMR Project by J. A. Tlce, TL ltUje?. J? Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 I Page 8.2-9 of 168 Page 6 of 165
. 'i i
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PRIMIER (LARRY CARTER) CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 o-r---~----~----+---~ 4~---~----+-----+---~
)f \))
)
8~--+-~----+-+----+---~ B I
/I 0
1\ \ w N 12~--~-+-----+-+---~---~ m b 1\ \ e
?( I) (
16~---+-+-----+-~--~---~ 20-r----+-----+-----r---~ 24~----+-----+----~---~ 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsion Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy T ransfe r Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 7 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-10 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PRIMIER (LARRY CARTER) CME 750 X (RIG S/N 323438) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 9.00ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 5 0.00 24.5 23.1 7.0 16.5 28 1.52 1.52 0.289 82.6 6 0.00 24.2 22.8 6.9 16.7 28 1.38 1.38 0.293 83.8 7 0.00 22.9 22.1 6.7 16.7 27 1.43 1.43 0.310 88.6 8 0.00 23.0 22.1 6.3 16.7 27 1.24 1.25 0.296 84.7 9 0.00 22.8 22.0 6.4 16.8 27 1.34 1.35 0.307 87.8 10 0.00 23.2 22.2 6.4 17.0 27 1.21 1.21 0.307 87.9 11 0.00 22.9 22.0 6.8 17.0 27 1.25 1.25 0.311 88.7 12 0.00 23.0 21.9 6.4 16.8 26 1.09 1.09 0.318 90.8 13 0.00 22.8 22.2 6.4 17.2 27 1.08 1.08 0.307 87.8 14 0.00 22.6 22.0 7.3 16.9 27 1.03 1.03 0.312 89.2 15 0.00 23.6 22.5 6.5 17.2 27 0.99 0.99 0.316 90.2 16 0.00 23.4 22.6 6.8 17.3 27 0.92 0.92 0.314 89.8 17 0.00 24.1 22.8 6.6 17.3 28 1.06 1.06 0.323 92.3 18 0.00 23.4 22.7 7.1 17.3 27 0.86 0.86 0.305 87.3 19 0.00 23.5 22.6 7.0 17.3 27 0.77 0.77 0.304 86.7 Average 23.3 22.4 6.7 17.0 27 1.14 1.14 0.307 87.9 Total number of blows analyzed: 15 Time Summary Drive 1 minute 21 seconds 9:56:22 AM - 9:57:43 AM (6/5/2013) BN 1 - 19 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-11 of 168 Page 8 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PRIMIER (LARRY CARTER 5-6.5 CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 5 10 B I 0 w ) N 15 \
\
m b e
\
))
20 1/
) I>
( \ 25 30
~
0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 9 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-12 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PRIMIER (LARRY CARTER 5-6.5 CME 750 X (RIG S/N 323438) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 10.50 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 10 0.00 26.0 24.2 6.7 16.9 29 1.31 1.31 0.305 87.0 11 0.00 26.6 25.0 7.5 17.0 30 1.23 1.23 0.301 85.9 12 0.00 26.6 25.0 7.5 16.9 30 1.20 1.20 0.305 87.1 13 0.00 26.9 25.0 7.0 16.8 30 1.37 1.38 0.307 87.7 14 0.00 26.6 25.1 7.7 16.9 30 1.27 1.27 0.302 86.3 15 0.00 26.8 25.0 8.4 16.8 30 1.16 1.16 0.294 83.9 16 0.00 26.6 24.5 6.6 16.5 30 1.17 1.17 0.303 86.6 17 0.00 27.4 25.6 7.8 17.1 31 1.24 1.24 0.306 87.6 18 0.00 27.6 25.4 6.6 17.0 31 1.16 1.17 0.302 86.1 19 0.00 27.8 25.3 7.2 17.0 31 1.21 1.21 0.302 86.2 20 0.00 27.5 25.1 5.9 16.9 30 1.32 1.32 0.313 89.3 21 0.00 27.0 24.4 6.3 16.6 30 1.29 1.29 0.302 86.4 22 0.00 28.0 25.4 6.0 16.9 31 1.32 1.32 0.301 86.0 23 0.00 28.0 25.1 6.3 16.6 30 1.38 1.38 0.314 89.8 24 0.00 28.6 25.8 6.9 16.6 31 1.21 1.21 0.303 86.5 25 0.00 28.0 24.9 5.7 16.7 30 1.16 1.16 0.305 87.0 26 0.00 28.4 25.8 6.6 16.9 31 1.21 1.21 0.287 82.1 27 0.00 28.7 25.5 5.6 16.7 31 1.18 1.18 0.302 86.4 28 0.00 28.8 26.1 5.7 17.2 32 1.15 1.15 0.295 84.2 29 0.00 29.4 26.6 6.5 17.5 32 1.15 1.15 0.303 86.5 Average 27.6 25.2 6.7 16.9 31 1.23 1.24 0.303 86.4 Total number of blows analyzed: 20 Time Summary Drive 40 seconds 10:02:35AM -10:03:15AM (6/5/2013) BN 1-30 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-13 of 168 Page 10 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PRIMIER (LARRY C) 6.5-8 CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 6
) ) y) ))
( 12 B I I\ 0 w f> t"'>) N 18 m
)
)
IJ b e ( ( 24 (: I 30 (\ II 36 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 11 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-14 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PRIMIER (LARRY C) 6.5-8 CME 750 X (RIG S/N 323438) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 12.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 9 0.00 26.6 24.7 5.5 17.3 30 0.90 0.90 0.309 88.3 10 0.00 25.7 24.6 6.2 17.7 30 1.09 1.09 0.321 91.6 11 0.00 26.0 24.6 6.0 17.7 30 1.00 1.00 0.317 90.6 12 0.00 24.8 23.7 5.4 17.2 29 0.97 0.97 0.305 87.1 13 0.00 25.7 23.4 5.1 17.5 28 1.09 1.09 0.303 86.5 14 0.00 25.4 23.6 6.7 17.2 29 1.03 1.03 0.306 87.4 15 0.00 26.1 23.8 5.4 17.6 29 1.12 1.12 0.317 90.7 16 0.00 27.4 25.2 5.0 17.6 31 0.96 0.96 0.314 89.8 17 0.00 26.8 24.7 5.5 17.6 30 1.00 1.00 0.312 89.2 18 0.00 25.4 23.5 4.7 17.3 28 1.00 1.00 0.310 88.7 19 0.00 25.8 23.6 5.0 17.4 29 1.14 1.14 0.318 90.9 20 0.00 25.4 22.9 4.8 17.5 28 1.00 1.00 0.312 89.2 21 0.00 24.7 22.9 5.3 17.1 28 1.13 1.13 0.315 90.0 22 0.00 25.7 23.2 4.3 17.6 28 1.02 1.02 0.318 90.8 23 0.00 24.4 22.2 4.4 17.2 27 1.19 1.19 0.303 86.7 24 0.00 26.2 23.3 3.8 17.0 28 1.03 1.04 0.308 88.0 25 0.00 25.4 23.2 3.8 17.2 28 1.26 1.26 0.320 91.5 26 0.00 25.1 22.9 3.8 17.1 28 1.19 1.19 0.310 88.5 27 0.00 24.9 23.3 4.3 17.2 28 1.10 1.10 0.320 91.3 28 0.00 25.1 23.7 4.0 17.2 29 0.88 0.88 0.315 90.0 29 0.00 24.6 23.9 4.3 17.1 29 0.98 0.98 0.315 90.0 30 0.00 24.3 23.6 3.3 16.7 29 1.11 1.11 0.317 90.7 31 0.00 24.4 23.4 4.1 17.2 28 0.91 0.91 0.317 90.5 32 0.00 25.0 23.8 3.8 17.2 29 0.94 0.94 0.318 90.9 33 0.00 24.4 23.5 3.4 16.9 28 0.94 0.94 0.305 87.2 Average 25.4 23.6 4.7 17.3 29 1.04 1.04 0.313 89.4 Total number of blows analyzed: 25 Time Summary Drive 42 seconds 10:07:59 AM - 10:08:41 AM (6/5/2013) BN 1 - 33 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-15 of 168 Page 12 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 21-Nov-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PRIMIER (LARRY C) 8'-9.5' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 5 10 B
~
I If 0 w D f
)
N 15 j ! :~ \ m b e ( i1 l 20
~
I I If f 25 30 (( 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsion Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy T ransfe r Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 13 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-16 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 21-Nov-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PRIMIER (LARRY C) 8'-9.5' CME 750 X (RIG S/N 323438) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 13.50 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 10 0.00 26.0 23.4 10.3 17.2 28 1.39 1.39 0.313 89.5 11 0.00 25.8 23.5 11.1 16.9 28 1.16 1.17 0.316 90.2 12 0.00 26.1 24.0 8.9 17.2 29 1.29 1.29 0.307 87.6 13 0.00 25.7 23.6 10.8 16.9 29 1.45 1.45 0.315 90.0 14 0.00 25.5 23.4 10.4 16.9 28 1.23 1.23 0.308 87.9 15 0.00 26.0 24.0 9.2 17.4 29 1.18 1.18 0.306 87.5 16 0.00 26.1 23.7 8.5 17.3 29 1.20 1.20 0.311 88.7 17 0.00 26.2 24.0 8.3 17.0 29 1.15 1.15 0.301 86.1 18 0.00 26.3 23.8 8.8 17.2 29 1.11 1.12 0.306 87.5 19 0.00 26.5 24.2 7.8 17.1 29 0.99 0.99 0.315 89.9 20 0.00 26.3 23.7 7.3 17.1 29 1.09 1.09 0.312 89.3 21 0.00 26.1 23.7 5.9 16.9 29 0.93 0.93 0.301 86.0 22 0.00 26.9 23.8 4.4 17.2 29 0.82 0.82 0.312 89.0 23 0.00 26.5 23.8 5.1 16.7 29 0.86 0.86 0.311 88.7 24 0.00 26.9 24.1 4.5 17.4 29 0.71 0.71 0.309 88.2 25 0.00 26.3 23.1 4.3 16.9 28 0.87 0.87 0.316 90.4 26 0.00 27.3 24.6 4.2 17.2 30 0.64 0.65 0.308 88.1 27 0.00 27.1 24.3 4.4 17.2 29 0.68 0.68 0.310 88.6 28 0.00 27.2 24.7 4.2 17.2 30 0.69 0.69 0.302 86.4 29 0.00 27.2 24.6 4.1 17.4 30 0.79 0.79 0.306 87.5 Average 26.4 23.9 7.1 17.1 29 1.01 1.01 0.309 88.4 Total number of blows analyzed: 20 Time Summary Drive 1 minute 1 second 10:12:38AM -10:13:39AM (6/5/2013) BN 1-31 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-17 of 168 Page 14 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PRIMIER (LARRY C) 9.5'-11' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 7
\\
14
~ \\
B I 0
~l w
N 21
~ ~~
m b e 28
\ ) ~.. ~~ \
)
35 I( ))
~
/ ~J 42 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - -
Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 15 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-18 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PRIMIER (LARRY C) 9.5'-11' CME 750 X (RIG S/N 323438) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 15.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 14 0.00 28.8 27.0 7.6 17.5 33 0.77 0.77 0.3 89.2 15 0.00 28.1 26.2 5.8 17.7 32 0.80 0.80 0.3 89.1 16 0.00 28.4 26.5 5.8 17.5 32 0.81 0.81 0.3 90.7 17 0.00 29.1 26.8 6.3 17.2 32 0.73 0.73 0.3 86.1 18 0.00 29.0 26.9 7.0 16.8 33 0.82 0.82 0.3 85.7 19 0.00 28.7 26.7 7.4 17.8 32 0.86 0.86 0.3 87.9 20 0.00 28.8 26.8 7.3 17.4 32 0.83 0.83 0.3 89.1 21 0.00 28.6 26.6 7.0 17.5 32 0.93 0.93 0.3 87.7 22 0.00 28.2 26.0 5.5 17.4 32 0.79 0.79 0.3 89.6 23 0.00 28.9 26.8 6.7 17.3 32 0.85 0.85 0.3 91.0 24 0.00 28.6 26.5 6.4 17.3 32 0.73 0.73 0.3 88.3 25 0.00 28.3 26.3 5.3 17.1 32 0.80 0.80 0.3 86.9 26 0.00 28.7 26.7 7.5 16.8 32 0.92 0.92 0.3 88.5 27 0.00 28.4 26.4 7.4 17.4 32 0.90 0.90 0.3 85.6 28 0.00 28.6 26.5 7.4 17.6 32 0.83 0.83 0.3 86.6 29 0.00 29.0 26.8 7.5 17.4 32 0.83 0.83 0.3 88.7 30 0.00 28.3 26.3 7.7 17.6 32 0.78 0.78 0.3 86.7 31 0.00 27.9 25.7 7.3 17.0 31 0.75 0.75 0.3 86.8 32 0.00 27.9 26.0 7.6 17.8 31 0.72 0.72 0.3 89.1 33 0.00 28.8 26.6 7.6 17.5 32 0.79 0.79 0.3 87.6 34 0.00 28.2 26.3 8.5 17.6 32 1.00 1.00 0.3 90.5 35 0.00 27.8 25.6 9.3 17.3 31 0.90 0.90 0.3 88.3 36 0.00 27.5 25.4 9.9 17.1 31 1.02 1.03 0.3 84.0 37 0.00 28.5 26.3 10.4 17.3 32 1.37 1.37 0.3 90.2 38 0.00 28.6 26.3 11.9 17.3 32 1.49 1.49 0.3 87.7 39 0.00 27.7 25.6 11.0 17.0 31 1.40 1.40 0.3 87.4 40 0.00 27.5 25.2 11.1 16.9 30 1.01 1.01 0.3 83.6 Average 28.4 26.3 7.8 17.3 32 0.90 0.91 0.3 87.9 Total number of blows analyzed: 27 Time Summary Drive 57 seconds 10:17:22 AM -10:18:19AM (6/5/2013) BN 1 -40 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-19 of 168 Page 16 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 15-Nov-2013 Test date: 30-Sep-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- LARRYC HAMMER REGAL (NEAR MP-28) 5'-6.5' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 r 5 (
- ~<
~
/r> -------.::
~
( 10 ~
~
~
B (
~
I 0 w N 15 I I I m b e 20 25 30 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 17 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-20 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOTVer. 2012.2- Printed: 15-Nov-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- LARRYC HAMMER REGAL (NEAR MP-28) 5'-6.5' CME 750X OP: MEH Test date: 30-Sep-2013 AR: 1.20 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 9.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 5 0.00 22.6 22.0 5.4 17.2 26 2.42 2.42 0.323 92.2 6 0.00 21.7 20.9 4.2 16.4 25 1.29 1.29 0.301 86.1 7 0.00 22.6 21.9 8.0 17.2 26 1.32 1.33 0.299 85.5 8 0.00 22.0 21.4 5.3 17.2 26 1.56 1.56 0.293 83.6 9 0.00 22.5 21.8 5.1 17.4 26 2.81 2.81 0.328 93.7 10 0.00 22.3 21.5 5.1 17.4 26 1.65 1.65 0.300 85.6 11 0.00 22.3 21.6 5.3 17.0 26 1.26 1.26 0.286 81.8 12 0.00 22.2 21.8 3.4 16.2 26 0.60 0.60 0.282 80.7 13 0.00 22.4 21.9 5.0 16.2 26 0.72 0.72 0.280 80.0 14 0.00 22.5 22.0 4.7 17.1 26 0.94 0.94 0.284 81.2 15 0.00 21.9 21.4 5.4 16.8 26 1.18 1.19 0.287 81.9 16 0.00 22.7 22.2 4.8 17.4 27 1.06 1.06 0.302 86.3 Average 22.3 21.7 5.1 17.0 26 1.40 1.40 0.297 84.9 Total number of blows analyzed: 12 Time Summary Drive 1 minute 8 seconds 2:08:05 PM- 2:09:13 PM (9/30/2013) BN 1 - 18 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-21 of 168 Page 18 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 15-Nov-2013 Test date: 30-Sep-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- LARRYC HAMMER REGAL (NEAR MP-28) 9'-10.5 CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 o-r---~----~----+---~ I< I 5~----~----+-,----+---~
~~
)) I) 10~--~-+-----+-+---~---~
B I 0 w (( N (( 15~--~-+-----+~---~---~ m b e ( 20-r---+-+-----+-~--~---~ ( 25-r----+-----+-----r---~ II ( 30~----+-----+----~---~ 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 19 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-22 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOTVer. 2012.2- Printed: 15-Nov-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- LARRYC HAMMER REGAL (NEAR MP-28) 9'-10.5 CME 750X OP: MEH Test date: 30-Se(l-2013 AR: 1.20 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 14.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 5 0.00 22.5 21.9 6.6 16.4 26 1.18 1.18 0.295 84.3 6 0.00 21.7 21.4 6.8 17.9 26 1.06 1.06 0.298 85.1 7 0.00 22.3 21.7 6.6 16.4 26 0.89 0.90 0.278 79.5 8 0.00 22.4 21.8 6.7 17.4 26 0.86 0.91 0.295 84.4 9 0.00 22.1 22.0 7.1 17.8 26 0.62 0.79 0.276 78.7 10 0.00 22.9 22.2 6.4 16.3 27 0.92 0.92 0.291 83.1 11 0.00 22.8 22.1 6.7 16.3 27 0.86 0.86 0.296 84.5 12 0.00 21.9 21.2 6.8 18.0 25 0.87 0.88 0.295 84.1 13 0.00 22.3 21.6 6.6 17.1 26 0.73 0.76 0.289 82.7 14 0.00 21.8 21.4 6.8 17.2 26 0.59 0.66 0.275 78.5 15 0.00 21.9 21.2 6.3 16.6 25 0.44 0.61 0.269 76.9 16 0.00 22.1 21.4 7.0 17.1 26 0.69 0.69 0.286 81.6 17 0.00 22.2 22.0 6.8 17.4 26 0.81 0.81 0.295 84.2 18 0.00 22 .5 22.4 6.6 16.9 27 0.60 0.61 0.280 79.9 19 0.00 22.7 22.5 7.0 17.5 27 0.64 0.64 0.286 81.8 20 0.00 22.7 22.4 7.0 17.9 27 0.71 0.72 0.294 84.1 21 0.00 22.8 22.5 7.4 18.1 27 0.70 0.70 0.291 83.2 22 0.00 22.8 22.6 6.7 17.9 27 0.81 0.81 0.302 86.3 23 0.00 22.2 21.9 7.1 18.1 26 0.62 0.62 0.286 81.7 24 0.00 22.2 22.0 6.7 17.3 26 0.56 0.60 0.287 81.9 Average 22.3 21.9 6.8 17.3 26 0.76 0.79 0.288 82.3 Total number of blows analyzed: 20 Time Summary Drive 32 seconds 2:19:56 PM- 2:20:28 PM (9/30/2013) BN 1-24 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-23 of 168 Page 20 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 15-Nov-2013 Test date: 30-Sep-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- LARRYC HAMMER REGAL (NEAR MP-28) 12-13.5 CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 8 l 16 (
)
~~
B I
~
0 w N 24
~~ ~( ~
m b e 32 \
)
> ?2 ) l
\\
40
? ~ {
48 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 21 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-24 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOTVer. 2012.2- Printed: 15-Nov-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- LARRYC HAMMER REGAL (NEAR MP-28) 12-13.5 CME 750X OP: MEH Test date: 30-Se(l-2013 AR: 1.20 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 18.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 16 0.00 22.5 22.3 7.5 16.8 27 0.66 0.66 0.281 80.2 17 0.00 22.6 22.4 6.7 17.0 27 0.87 0.87 0.297 84.9 18 0.00 23.1 22.8 7.3 17.2 27 0.87 0.87 0.306 87.5 19 0.00 22.9 22.6 7.7 16.8 27 0.67 0.67 0.281 80.4 20 0.00 22.4 22.2 7.1 16.7 27 0.82 0.82 0.296 84.5 21 0.00 22.2 22.0 7.0 16.5 26 0.83 0.83 0.284 81.2 22 0.00 22.8 22.6 7.2 16.4 27 0.63 0.63 0.275 78.5 23 0.00 22.3 22.1 6.9 16.4 27 0.86 0.86 0.292 83.4 24 0.00 22.8 22.6 7.1 16.5 27 0.68 0.68 0.279 79.6 25 0.00 21.9 21.6 7.0 16.4 26 0.72 0.72 0.286 81.6 26 0.00 22.0 21.7 6.9 16.2 26 0.82 0.82 0.276 78.8 27 0.00 22.3 22.1 7.3 16.5 27 0.86 0.86 0.291 83.0 28 0.00 23.0 22.7 6.8 16.6 27 0.79 0.79 0.292 83.5 29 0.00 22 .5 22.3 7.1 16.5 27 0.84 0.84 0.285 81.5 30 0.00 22.5 22.3 6.4 16.4 27 0.64 0.64 0.280 80.1 31 0.00 22.2 22.0 6.8 16.7 26 0.86 0.86 0.292 83.5 32 0.00 22.5 22.3 6.7 16.6 27 0.76 0.76 0.289 82.4 33 0.00 22.0 21.8 6.2 16.4 26 0.79 0.79 0.291 83.2 34 0.00 22 .3 22.2 6.2 16.1 27 0.70 0.70 0.285 81.5 35 0.00 22.3 22.3 6.4 16.2 27 0.71 0.71 0.287 82.1 36 0.00 21.9 21.8 5.7 16.2 26 0.83 0.83 0.296 84.7 37 0.00 22.8 22.6 6.3 16.3 27 0.78 0.79 0.294 83.9 38 0.00 21.9 21.9 5.5 15.9 26 0.66 0.66 0.289 82.5 39 0.00 22 .9 22.9 6.0 16.4 27 0.80 0.80 0.297 84.9 40 0.00 22.0 21.8 5.5 16.0 26 0.39 0.42 0.276 78.8 41 0.00 23.0 22.9 6.2 16.1 28 0.79 0.79 0.297 84.9 42 0.00 22.0 22.0 5.7 16.1 26 0.59 0.60 0.284 81.3 43 0.00 22.8 22.7 6.1 16.3 27 0.73 0.73 0.291 83.0 44 0.00 22.3 22.2 5.8 16.3 27 0.76 0.76 0.290 82.8 Average 22.4 22.3 6.6 16.4 27 0.75 0.75 0.288 82.4 Total number of blows analyzed: 29 Time Summary Drive 1 minute 27 seconds 2:35:57 PM- 2:37:24 PM (9/30/2013) BN 1 - 45 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-25 of 168 Page 22 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 15-Nov-2013 Test date: 30-Sep-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- LARRYC HAMMER REGAL (NEAR MP-28) 13.5-15 CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 6 12 B
~ \?
~ ~>
I 0 w (/ ( ( N 18 m b
~> ~ I ~>
e
~
[( 24
<~(
30 II / vI 36 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 23 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-26 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOTVer. 2012.2- Printed: 15-Nov-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- LARRYC HAMMER REGAL (NEAR MP-28) 13.5-15 CME 750X OP: MEH Test date: 30-Se(l-2013 AR: 1.20 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 19.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 13 0.00 22.3 22.2 6.7 16.6 27 0.78 0.78 0.273 77.9 14 0.00 23.0 22.6 6.8 16.8 27 0.93 0.93 0.278 79.5 15 0.00 22.0 21.9 6.0 17.1 26 0.83 0.83 0.280 79.9 16 0.00 23.0 22.8 6.4 17.5 27 1.25 1.26 0.304 87.0 17 0.00 22.2 22.0 5.8 17.0 26 0.98 0.98 0.285 81.6 18 0.00 22.9 22.5 5.9 17.1 27 0.88 0.88 0.283 80.8 19 0.00 23.1 22.7 6.3 17.2 27 1.04 1.04 0.286 81.6 20 0.00 22.1 22.0 5.7 17.2 26 0.82 0.82 0.291 83.1 21 0.00 22.0 21.4 5.8 17.2 26 0.93 0.93 0.279 79.6 22 0.00 23.0 22.3 5.7 17.5 27 1.27 1.27 0.314 89.6 23 0.00 22.5 21.7 5.7 17.0 26 0.71 0.71 0.270 77.0 24 0.00 22.8 22.2 5.7 17.4 27 1.12 1.12 0.308 87.9 25 0.00 22.5 22.2 5.4 17.0 27 0.76 0.76 0.287 82.1 26 0.00 22.2 22.1 5.4 16.9 26 0.76 0.77 0.277 79.0 27 0.00 22.2 21.7 5.6 16.9 26 0.96 0.96 0.283 80.9 28 0.00 22.7 21.8 5.4 16.8 26 0.57 0.67 0.273 78.1 29 0.00 22.8 21.7 5.3 16.7 26 0.79 0.79 0.275 78.5 30 0.00 23.0 22.0 5.1 17.6 26 1.16 1.16 0.313 89.3 31 0.00 22.7 22.2 5.3 17.1 27 1.08 1.08 0.305 87.0 32 0.00 23.1 22.1 5.3 17.0 27 0.98 0.98 0.290 83.0 Average 22.6 22.1 5.8 17.1 27 0.93 0.93 0.288 82.2 Total number of blows analyzed: 20 Time Summary Drive 1 minute 4 seconds 2:42:12 PM- 2:43:16 PM (9/30/2013) BN 1-32 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-27 of 168 Page 24 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 15-Nov-2013 Test date: 30-Sep-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- LARRYC HAMMER REGAL (NEAR MP-28) 15-16.5 CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 6 B I 0 w 12 N 18
\ \
t
\\
)
~
\
;) \
~
m b e ( 24
/~ (
( [(
) )
30
) )
36 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsion Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy T ransfe r Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 25 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-28 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOTVer. 2012.2- Printed: 15-Nov-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- LARRYC HAMMER REGAL (NEAR MP-28) 15-16.5 CME 750X OP: MEH Test date: 30-Se(l-2013 AR: 1.20 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 20.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 11 0.00 23.2 22.4 5.5 14.5 27 0.79 0.80 0.285 81.4 12 0.00 22.7 22.0 5.2 14.6 26 0.89 0.89 0.293 83.8 13 0.00 22.4 21.7 5.3 14.5 26 0.73 0.73 0.278 79.5 14 0.00 22.4 22.3 5.4 14.9 27 0.90 0.90 0.296 84.7 15 0.00 22.2 21.7 5.1 15.5 26 1.00 1.00 0.299 85.3 16 0.00 22.8 22.1 5.0 14.8 26 0.70 0.70 0.274 78.3 17 0.00 22.3 21.7 5.4 15.2 26 0.91 0.91 0.283 80.9 18 0.00 22.4 21.8 5.3 15.0 26 0.57 0.59 0.267 76.4 19 0.00 22.6 22.0 5.5 15.6 26 0.70 0.70 0.286 81.8 20 0.00 22.2 22.0 5.4 15.5 26 0.61 0.65 0.280 80.1 21 0.00 21.8 21.6 5.4 15.3 26 0.79 0.79 0.276 78.9 22 0.00 22.5 22.2 5.3 15.5 27 0.80 0.80 0.294 83.9 23 0.00 22.3 22.0 5.6 15.7 26 0.79 0.79 0.289 82.7 24 0.00 21 .8 21.5 6.0 15.8 26 0.93 0.93 0.290 82.8 25 0.00 21.9 21.7 5.6 15.5 26 0.72 0.72 0.278 79.6 26 0.00 22.2 21.9 5.6 15.5 26 0.80 0.80 0.280 79.9 27 0.00 21.8 21.4 5.3 15.6 26 0.72 0.72 0.272 77.8 28 0.00 21.1 20.8 4.8 15.4 25 0.73 0.73 0.275 78.6 29 0.00 21.0 20.7 4.8 15.7 25 0.74 0.74 0.275 78.6 30 0.00 21.7 21.5 5.4 15.2 26 0.79 0.79 0.276 78.9 31 0.00 22.2 22.0 5.6 15.6 26 0.75 0.75 0.283 80.9 32 0.00 22.1 21.9 5.4 15.5 26 0.78 0.78 0.290 82.9 33 0.00 22.1 21.8 5.3 16.0 26 0.78 0.78 0.283 80.9 Average 22.2 21.8 5.4 15.3 26 0.78 0.78 0.283 80.8 Total number of blows analyzed: 23 Time Summary Drive 1 minute 2 seconds 2:48:04 PM- 2:49:06 PM (9/30/2013) BN 1 - 35 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-29 of 168 Page 26 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 15-Nov-2013 Test date: 30-Sep-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- LARRYC HAMMER REGAL (NEAR MP-28) 16.5-18 CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 6
?t l I>
12 B I
)
0 w
))
N 18 1\
~~
m b e 24
\ ~ ~~
I 30
<~ ( (
36 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsion Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy T ransfe r Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 27 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-30 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOTVer. 2012.2- Printed: 15-Nov-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- LARRYC HAMMER REGAL (NEAR MP-28) 16.5-18 CME 750X OP: MEH Test date: 30-Se(l-2013 AR: 1.20 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 21.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 12 0.00 23.2 23.2 7.0 16.5 28 0.60 0.60 0.273 78.0 13 0.00 23.5 23.5 7.5 16.8 28 1.02 1.02 0.297 84.9 14 0.00 22.7 22.6 7.2 16.4 27 0.49 0.57 0.272 77.7 15 0.00 22.4 22.3 6.8 16.8 27 0.70 0.70 0.287 82.0 16 0.00 22.3 22.3 6.8 16.4 27 0.43 0.55 0.265 75.6 17 0.00 22.6 22.6 7.7 16.6 27 0.58 0.61 0.268 76.6 18 0.00 23.0 22.7 7.5 16.5 27 0.43 0.57 0.269 77.0 19 0.00 22.9 22.8 6.8 16.8 27 0.66 0.67 0.285 81.4 20 0.00 23.0 23.0 7.0 16.9 28 0.84 0.85 0.293 83.6 21 0.00 22.6 22.5 7.3 16.9 27 0.82 0.82 0.290 82.9 22 0.00 22.9 22.9 6.9 16.6 27 0.75 0.75 0.279 79.7 23 0.00 23.2 23.2 6.9 16.8 28 0.78 0.78 0.289 82.6 24 0.00 23.4 23.3 7.0 16.6 28 0.55 0.60 0.275 78.5 25 0.00 23.1 23.0 7.4 16.7 28 0.91 0.92 0.293 83.8 26 0.00 23.4 23.4 6.8 16.6 28 0.49 0.60 0.277 79.1 27 0.00 23.3 23.3 7.3 16.6 28 0.72 0.72 0.276 78.9 28 0.00 22.6 22.5 6.8 16.7 27 0.63 0.64 0.278 79.3 29 0.00 22.9 22.9 6.8 16.7 27 0.88 0.88 0.293 83.6 30 0.00 23.2 23.2 6.9 16.6 28 0.47 0.62 0.278 79.4 31 0.00 22.9 22.9 6.7 16.9 27 0.52 0.64 0.278 79.3 32 0.00 22.8 22.7 6.9 17.1 27 0.68 0.69 0.285 81.5 33 0.00 22.3 22.1 6.5 17.1 26 0.57 0.64 0.280 79.9 34 0.00 22.3 22.1 6.5 17.0 27 0.71 0.71 0.281 80.4 Average 22.9 22.8 7.0 16.7 27 0.66 0.70 0.281 80.3 Total number of blows analyzed: 23 Time Summary Drive 53 seconds 2:54:46 PM- 2:55:39 PM (9/30/2013) BN 1-37 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-31 of 168 Page 28 of 165
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, lntPile Driving Analyzer CLINCH RIVER SMR CLINCH RIVER PRIMIER (LARRY CARTER) F (44n)~====~-------------------------------------------AA33.4r!F~3~4-, v ( 2 10. 2) 69 @ 7. 67 n I
- .62@ 1.00 f t 1
Project Information Quantity Results PROJECT: CLINCH RIVER SMR CSI 23.5 ksi PILE NAME: CLINCH RIVER PRIMIER (LARRY CACSXR22.6 ksi DESCR: CME 750 X (RIG S/N 323438) TSX 7.0 ksi OPERATOR: MEH VMX 17.3 f/s FILE: CLINCH RIVER PRIMIER (LARRY CARTER) FMX -5' 27Ckips 6/5/2013 9:57:43 AM DFN 0.77 in Blow Number 18/19 DMX 0. 77 in EMX 0.3 k-ft Pile Properties ETR 86.7 (%) LE 9.00 ft AR 1.21 in"'2 Sensors EM 30000 ksi F3: [75AW1] 208.84 (1) SP 0.492 k/ft3 F4: [75AW2] 209.17 (1) WS 16807.9 f/s A3: [K3370] 325 mv/5000g's (1) EA/C 2. 2 ksec/ft A4: [K0686] 315 mv/5000g's (1) 2L/C 1.08 ms CLIP: OK JC [] F3/F4: OK 1.03 V3/V4: OK 1.09 Version 2011.104 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 RCN: CRP-1215.1 Page 8.2-32 of 168 Page 29 of 165
10 January 2014 Mr. Steve Criscenzo AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 4021 Stirrup Creek Drive Suite 100 Durham, North Carolina 27703
Subject:
Report of SPT Hammer Energy Measurements Premier Drilling CME SSOX Drill Rig Rig Serial No. 337153 Automatic Hammer Clinch River SMR Site AMEC Project No. 6468-13-1072 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC) is pleased to present the results of Standard Penetration Test (SPT) hammer energy measurements for the subject drill rig at the Clinch River SMR site in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This report summarizes the field testing activities and presents the results of the hammer energy measurements. SPT Hammer Energy Field Measurements SPT energy measurements were made at the referenced site on June 5, 2013. A separate boring from the planned exploratory borings was used (test hole #3 near MET Tower). Per an approved deviation request testing was performed at depths shallower than those recommended in ASTM D4633-10 due to the presence of relatively shallow rock at the site. The testing was performed by Michael Hamilton, an AMEC representative, from approximately 12:00PM to 1:OOPM under partly cloudy skies and an air temperature of about 80 degrees Fahrenheit. The boring was drilled with personnel and equipment from Premier Drilling. The drilling equipment consisted of a CME 550X drill rig with an automatic SPT hammer. The drilling tools consisted of AW-J sized drilling rods and a 2-foot long split tube sampler. The drill rig operator during sampling was Javier Landeros. Energy measurements were recorded during sampling at the depth intervals shown in Table 1. The energy measurements were performed with a SPT Analyzer (Serial No.3622L) with SPT Analyzer software, accelerometers (Serial Nos. K3370 and K0686) and strain gages (Serial Nos. 75 AW-1 and 75 AW-2). A steel drill rod, 2 feet long and instrumented with dedicated strain gages, was inserted at the top of the drill rod string immediately below the SPT hammer anvil. The inserted rod was also instrumented with two piezoresistive accelerometers that were bolted to the outside of the rod. The instrumented rod insert had a cross-sectional area of approximately 1.21 square inches and an outside diameter of approximately 1.75 inches at the gage location. The drill rods Correspondence: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 2801 Yorkmont Road Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28208 Tel (704) 357-8600 Fax (704) 357-8638 arnec.com RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 30 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-33 of 168
SPT Energy Measurements- Premier CME 550X Drill Rig January 10, 2014 AMEC Project No. 6468-13-1072 Page2 included in the drill rod string were hollow rods in 5- to 10-foot long sections, with outside and inside diameters of approximately 1. 75 and 1.375 inches, respectively. Due to the closed hammer system, the hammer lubrication condition could not be observed. Calibration Records The calibration records for the equipment associated with this testing are filed in the project record control center. The calibration services were procured and approved in accordance with the commercial grade dedication process as outlined in AMEC's nuclear quality assurance program. Calculations for EFV The work was performed in accordance with ASTM D 4633-10. The strain and acceleration signals were converted to force and velocity by the PDA. The maximum energy transmitted to the drill rod string (EFV), as measured at the location of the strain gages and accelerometers, was calculated by the SPT Analyzer using the equation shown below: EFV =f F(t)
- V(t)
- dt Where: EFV =Transferred energy (EFV equation), or Energy of FV F(t) = Calculated force at timet V(t) =Calculated velocity at time t As recommended by ASTM D 4633-10, the force-velocity method of energy calculation was used. The equation shown above for calculating EFV, integrated over the complete wave event, measures the total energy of the event using both force and velocity measurements. The EFV values associated with each blow analyzed are tabulated in the attached PDIPLOT tables and are also shown graphically in the PDIPLOT charts.
Calculations for ETR The ratio of the measured transferred energy (EFV) to the theoretical potential energy of the SPT system (140 lb weight with the specified 30 inch fall) is the ETR. The ETR values (as a percentage of the theoretical value) are shown in Table 1. Comparison of ETR to Typical Energy Transfer Ratio Range Based on a research report published by the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) (Report WPI No. 0510859, 1999), the average ETR measured for automatic hammers was 79.6%. The standard deviation was 7.9%; therefore, the range of ETRs within one standard deviation of the average was reported to be 71.7% to 87.5%. This range of ETRs was also consistent with other research that was cited in the FOOT research paper; however, maximum and minimum ETR values of up to 98% and 56%, respectively, were reported in the literature. The ETR values shown in Table 1 are within the range of typical values for automatic hammers as reported in the literature. RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 31 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-34 of 168
SPT Energy Measurements- Premier CME 550X Drill Rig January 10, 2014 AMEC Project No. 6468-13*1072 Page3 Evaluation and Conclusions Based on the field testing results, our evaluation and conclusions from the SPT energy measurements are summarized below:
- The average energy transferred from the hammer to the drill rods for each individual depth interval ranged from 276 foot-pounds to 281 foot-pounds.
These average energy transfers correspond to energy transfer ratios (ETR) of 79% to 80% of the theoretical energy (350 foot-pounds) of the SPT hammer.
- The average at each depth interval was calculated as the transferred energy for each analyzed blow at the depth interval divided by the total number of hammer blows analyzed. The overall average energy transfer of the SPT system (for all the depth intervals tested) was 278.9 foot-pounds, with an average ETR of 79.7%.
Closing Please contact us when we can be of further service or if you have any questions concerning this report. Sincerely, AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
~d.fJ&uL Mike Hamilton, E.I.T.
QuLJ Steven E. Kiser Technical Professional
- 1 Principal Geotechnical Professional
~ \f\o_vvAJ-~
For -with Permission Attachments: Page 4- Table 1- Summary of SPT Energy Measurements -1 Page Page 5- Record of SPT Energy Measurement- 1 Page Pages 6 POl PLOT Output- 10 Pages Page 16 - Example Force Velocity Plot RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 32 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-35 of 168
"'C(") ~= t1) ~ TABLE 1 m:T N;u
SUMMARY
OF SPT ENERGY MEASUREMENTS (ASTM D4633-10) w ;::* "'tl) .., Premier SPT Energy Measurements S,c ..... ~~~ Oak Ridge, Tennessee
- a. iii CO;Q AMEC Project No. 6468-13-1072 t1)
"'C 0
~ "C c ~ "C 0
;u <:<: Z' :>
t1) "0 0 ~ -cr..
Clol ;;.... ~~
~ :.... ~ :0- ~r.l p:: E-<
~ ~- "0 ~ -:: "; :... ~
~ .s "' ~
= bl) cz:
(")
;u e~ =
~ .s Ci3 .c
=~ ~ 0: -
~
bJl "0
=
z~ 0 ~ ~
,::l.
0 0
,::l.
Q
=Clol
~ "' c 0:
7' 0 ~ "':; ,e > ""j" 0: :..
~ Q
..... ~ bn bJl 0
*=>< 0 Clol /!::::
- .. Q bJl .s Q *<;; <
ua:.~
..... *;::: c::: bJl c 0: bn-- E- >
~ 2 Q. 0 :.... S5 0: ;;....
..... :. A ..... ..... <
bn-00 ~ 0 Q 5 ii3 g, 0 t> :..bn . -"
&:Q 0:
"' .!:!J 00 ~ 0 ..( ~ ~ '$.
c::::: z
~ ~ ~-
3.5-5.0 I 3-7-8 I 15 I 279 I 79.7% Test hole #3 5.0-6.5 I 7-8-11 I 19 I 276 I 78.9% 337153 Premier Javier (near MET 6/5/2013 I AW-J 6.5-8.0 I 5-11-11 I 22 I 281 I 80.3% CME550X Drilling Landeros Tower) 8.0-9.5 I 3-6-10 I 16 I 279 I 79.7% 9.5-11.0 I 3-8-13 I 21 I 279 I 79.7% I Average for rug: I 278.9 I 79.7% I aMeasured Energy is energy based on the EFV method, as outlined in ASTM 04633-10, for each blow recorded by the PDA. Only blows used to calculate N-values were considered per ASTM D4633-10. In some cases, the initial and/or final one to two blows produced poor quality data, and were not used to calculate the Average Measured Energy. EFV = EMX
- 1000 lbslk.ip, where EMX equals the transferred energy measured by the PDA (see attached PDA data).
bEnergy Transfer Ratio is the Measured Energy divided by the theoretical SPT energy of350 foot-pounds (140 pound hammer falling 2.5 feet). The average EFY and ETR values may differ slightly and insignificantly from those in the PDIPLOT tables due to roundoff. Prepared By: ~~ Date: l ..... \D-1 l{ Checked By: YL Date: 1-1 o~ ~~
;o 0
"'OZ OJ . .
<eo t1) ;o W<J w,
~
0....,~
~(Jl
~0
2801 YORKMONT ROAD, SUITE 100 CHARLOTIE, NC 28208 ame Telephone: (704) 357-8600 I Facsimile: (704) 357-8638 RECORD OF SPT ENERGY MEASUREMENT- ASTM 04633- 10 GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: (1,/ '11.e.k i2 u*er 5MR 1 DATE: fo-"" n-r~ PROJECT NO.: (n'-!r.~ ID'?J INSPECTOR:* m l?-tt- , LOCATION: -me-T. 'LOJJM' WEATHER: tbri-M flr..lJJ/Ur, I X'D(') BORING AND DRILL RIG DATA 11 rr ' BORING NUMBER: e. IL.<>~- J,t> I & ~ DRILLING COMPANY: Prt wt: -U"' RIG OPERATOR:& **s-;,;.f .M' ~-<S.~i~ .r UV\dPro<; DRILL RIG MAKE: ( __;y;g HAMMER OPERATOR: MCi-llll.t\ UWZit DRILL RIG MODEL: e,/11 e 6& tJ >< PAK SERIAL NO.:
"'ii""jl/1 3622L . RIG SERIAL NO.: ":{~1) J:::; z.
INSTR. ROD AREA: J* 'Z I if'l'l HAMMER TYPE: Automatic ACCEL. SERIAL NOS.: A3: I K ~~'7/ll 1< A4: 1 tS[,'ff& ROPE CONDITION: N/A STRAIN SERIAL NOS.: F3: I IJUJ * '1(/. "'{ F4: IAW~'Jv~ Z
- NO. OF SHEAVES: N/A SPT OBSERVATION ROD ROD SAMPLE SPT OR SIZE LENGTH DEPTH N-VALUE COMMENTS SPT DATA RECORD (AW-J, NW, etc) (feet) (feet) (bpf) 5? I De.. -I-~ et'd't I j.}ty <J' 0 '),0'--S" s~ '7- -t IJ;;: JS &ol'>c/
/() .5 5-*[e.S '7 _. 'f?-1} A}*::./~ r;-rYCd .IJtt E!tlra.. ff,*
JJ.. G ~ -:\ - I I - II t!ti~ z-z G-ot>t?/ l)J) ~t- ?.S -s- Jo -I D ,u:::.1£ ~ (<CJ.:<d 15- ?.c; - II' '1, -'if- 13 {}otT) tJ. *~fJej) II REMARKS i
*I S '?T \} e.rs-.c. n -;).. 1 1 'S 1 ~01 ?...<::>"7 '13.:5 Form 4633 REV.2 (11-4-11)
PREPARED BY: /VI, tfdA~ t l'l CHECKED BY: DATE: Ce_- S-- t* DATE: RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 34 of 165 Clinch River Data Report .rfe<tf.fli &R~r9.Yff.f&r Use on Clinch River SMR Project by J. A. Tice, TL Page 8.2-37 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PREMIER (JAVIER L) 3.5'-5' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0
/f 5
I! I I f 10
\ ~~
B I 0 w N 15
\\ \\
m b e 20 25 30 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 35 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-38 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PREMIER (JAVIER L) 3.5'-5' CME 550 X (s/n 337153) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 9.00ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 5 0.00 21.1 18.1 11.8 19.6 22 1.19 1.23 0.275 78.5 6 0.00 20.8 17.5 10.4 18.6 21 1.07 1.11 0.271 77.5 7 0.00 21.0 17.4 10.2 18.7 21 1.10 1.11 0.267 76.2 8 0.00 21.1 17.6 8.8 18.7 21 1.04 1.07 0.272 77.7 9 0.00 20.9 17.3 8.1 18.8 21 0.93 0.97 0.269 76.7 10 0.00 20.5 17.3 6.8 18.4 21 1.03 1.04 0.276 78.9 11 0.00 19.9 17.7 7.3 18.4 21 1.08 1.08 0.285 81.4 12 0.00 20.0 17.4 7.6 18.5 21 1.03 1.03 0.284 81.2 13 0.00 20.0 17.3 7.6 18.6 21 0.99 1.00 0.279 79.7 14 0.00 20.1 17.9 8.2 18.9 22 1.04 1.04 0.289 82.5 15 0.00 20.5 18.1 7.5 18.2 22 0.92 0.92 0.282 80.6 16 0.00 20.6 18.4 7.3 18.5 22 0.94 0.94 0.285 81.4 17 0.00 20.5 18.1 7.3 18.6 22 0.85 0.85 0.279 79.8 18 0.00 20.7 18.2 7.2 18.8 22 0.97 0.97 0.288 82.3 19 0.00 20.6 18.2 6.8 18.8 22 0.90 0.90 0.287 81.9 Average 20.6 17.8 8.2 18.7 21 1.00 1.02 0.279 79.8 Total number of blows analyzed: 15 Time Summary Drive 31 seconds 12:14:12 PM- 12:14:43 PM (6/5/2013) BN 1 -19 RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 36 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-39 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PREMIER (JAVIER L) 5'-6.5' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 o-r---~----~----+---~ 5~---~----+-----+---~ 10~----+----r-+----~---~ B ) I 0 w N 15~----*----+-+----~---~ m b
)
e 20~----++---+-+----~---~ 25-r----+----+-+-----r---~ 30~----+-----+----~---~ 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsion Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy T ransfe r Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 37 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-40 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PREMIER (JAVIER L) 5'-6.5' CME 550 X (s/n 337153) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 10.50 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 10 0.00 21.0 17.1 9.9 19.8 21 0.96 0.98 0.278 79.3 11 0.00 21.3 17.3 10.2 19.9 21 0.98 0.99 0.282 80.7 12 0.00 21.6 17.5 10.0 19.9 21 0.90 0.91 0.278 79.5 13 0.00 21.5 17.3 10.5 20.2 21 0.91 0.91 0.283 80.8 14 0.00 21.6 17.5 10.3 20.4 21 0.95 0.95 0.281 80.4 15 0.00 21.8 17.5 10.3 20.3 21 0.87 0.87 0.281 80.2 16 0.00 21.5 17.3 10.4 20.3 21 0.88 0.88 0.282 80.6 17 0.00 21.7 17.3 10.8 20.4 21 0.93 0.93 0.281 80.2 18 0.00 21.2 17.0 10.3 20.1 21 0.88 0.89 0.275 78.5 19 0.00 21.0 17.0 10.6 20.2 21 0.83 0.84 0.275 78.6 20 0.00 21.6 17.4 11.2 20.4 21 0.89 0.89 0.279 79.7 21 0.00 21.4 17.5 11.1 20.6 21 0.85 0.85 0.277 79.2 22 0.00 21.6 17.5 11.0 20.5 21 0.79 0.79 0.280 79.9 23 0.00 20.4 17.5 9.9 19.6 21 0.76 0.76 0.269 76.9 24 0.00 20.2 17.4 10.0 19.7 21 0.77 0.77 0.268 76.4 25 0.00 20.1 17.5 9.9 19.5 21 0.72 0.72 0.268 76.6 26 0.00 19.9 17.2 9.8 19.4 21 0.74 0.74 0.267 76.2 27 0.00 20.1 17.4 10.1 19.6 21 0.76 0.76 0.278 79.4 28 0.00 20.2 17.2 10.2 19.4 21 0.74 0.74 0.271 77.5 Average 21.0 17.3 10.3 20.0 21 0.85 0.85 0.276 79.0 Total number of blows analyzed: 19 Time Summary Drive 33 seconds 12:19:16 PM- 12:19:49 PM (6/5/2013) BN 1-28 RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 38 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-41 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PREMIER (JAVIER L) 6.5'-8' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 5
) \
(( ~ t 10 B
)
I 0 w N 15 m b e
~ ( u
~
( 20 25
))
\
lr I 30 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsi on Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy Transfer Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 39 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-42 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PREMIER (JAVIER L) 6.5'-8' CME 550 X (s/n 337153) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 12.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 7 0.00 20.1 18.4 8.5 17.4 22 0.88 0.90 0.254 72.5 8 0.00 21.5 19.6 8.7 18.7 24 1.02 1.02 0.284 81.2 9 0.00 21.5 19.4 8.2 19.1 23 0.80 0.81 0.283 81.0 10 0.00 21.2 19.0 7.7 19.3 23 0.81 0.82 0.280 79.9 11 0.00 21.3 19.0 7.7 19.3 23 0.77 0.77 0.281 80.2 12 0.00 21.4 19.1 7.4 19.4 23 0.68 0.68 0.286 81.7 13 0.00 21.6 19.1 6.8 19.3 23 0.61 0.61 0.280 80.0 14 0.00 21.6 19.3 6.9 19.3 23 0.64 0.64 0.286 81.7 15 0.00 21.2 19.1 7.5 19.1 23 0.53 0.53 0.276 78.8 16 0.00 21.2 19.3 7.6 19.2 23 0.59 0.59 0.280 80.0 17 0.00 20.9 19.1 7.7 19.0 23 0.68 0.68 0.277 79.1 18 0.00 21.0 19.1 7.5 19.0 23 0.79 0.79 0.274 78.2 19 0.00 20.7 18.6 7.3 18.9 23 0.74 0.74 0.261 74.7 20 0.00 21 .3 19.7 7.4 19.3 24 0.96 0.96 0.285 81.4 21 0.00 21.1 19.3 7.3 19.2 23 0.82 0.82 0.278 79.4 22 0.00 21.1 19.8 7.0 19.4 24 0.75 0.75 0.281 80.4 23 0.00 21.0 19.6 6.8 19.7 24 0.88 0.88 0.290 82.8 24 0.00 21.3 19.7 7.1 19.9 24 0.85 0.85 0.283 80.9 25 0.00 21 .3 20.1 7.0 20.5 24 0.77 0.77 0.289 82.5 26 0.00 21.7 20.0 7.1 20.2 24 0.91 0.91 0.288 82.2 27 0.00 21.3 20.3 6.9 20.6 25 0.86 0.86 0.297 84.9 28 0.00 22.5 20.3 7.1 20.0 25 0.85 0.85 0.291 83.0 Average 21.3 19.4 7.4 19.3 23 0.78 0.78 0.281 80.3 Total number of blows analyzed: 22 Time Summary Drive 47 seconds 12:23:55 PM- 12:24:42 PM (6/5/2013) BN 1-28 RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 40 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-43 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PREMIER (JAVIER L) 8'-9.5' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 10 5
) ; '(
(
>?>
I
~
~
r-----
~
~
B I 0 w N 15
\ \
~(
m b ( e 20 I I 25 30 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsion Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy T ransfe r Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 41 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-44 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PREMIER (JAVIER L) 8'-9.5' CME 550 X (s/n 337153) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 13.50 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 5 0.00 21.1 20.3 14.3 19.3 25 2.12 2.12 0.299 85.5 6 0.00 19.7 17.7 13.2 17.2 21 1.07 1.08 0.233 66.6 7 0.00 21.3 18.8 14.0 19.4 23 1.41 1.41 0.290 83.0 8 0.00 21.7 19.2 14.9 20.5 23 1.23 1.26 0.310 88.6 9 0.00 19.8 18.0 13.8 17.4 22 1.12 1.12 0.244 69.6 10 0.00 20.9 18.9 13.8 18.2 23 1.23 1.23 0.271 77.4 11 0.00 20.5 18.7 13.8 18.1 23 1.08 1.08 0.271 77.5 12 0.00 20.5 18.4 13.6 18.1 22 0.96 0.96 0.268 76.7 13 0.00 21.4 19.0 14.2 19.0 23 0.90 0.90 0.291 83.2 14 0.00 21.2 19.2 13.6 18.1 23 0.76 0.77 0.281 80.2 15 0.00 21.2 18.9 13.6 17.8 23 0.92 0.92 0.278 79.5 16 0.00 20.7 19.1 14.1 18.6 23 1.01 1.03 0.287 82.1 17 0.00 21.3 18.4 13.4 19.3 22 0.99 0.99 0.289 82.4 18 0.00 20.1 18.5 13.5 18.6 22 0.89 0.89 0.287 82.0 19 0.00 20.4 18.4 13.0 18.5 22 1.02 1.02 0.285 81.5 20 0.00 20.4 18.6 13.4 18.5 23 0.94 0.94 0.281 80.2 Average 20.8 18.8 13.8 18.5 23 1.10 1.11 0.279 79.8 Total number of blows analyzed: 16 Time Summary Drive 33 seconds 12:38:36 PM- 12:39:09 PM (6/5/2013) BN 1-20 RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 42 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-45 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.- Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 Test date: 5-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PREMIER (JAVIER L) 9.5'-11' CSX (ksi) - - - DFN(in) - - - EMX (k-It) - - - Max Measured Compr. Stress Final Displacement Max Transferred Energy 0 10 20 30 40 0.00 1.25 2.50 3.75 5.00 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 5 (
~~
l 10
/~ l<
B I 0
)
w
\ r\
N 15 I / m b e 20
\ \ \
25
) 1 / /
30 0 10 20 30 40 0 2 3 4 0 25 50 75 100 TSX (ksi) - - - DMX (in) - - - ETR ((%)) - - - Te nsion Stress Maximum Maximum Displacement Energy T ransfe r Ratio RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 43 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-46 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Case Method & iCAP Results PDIPLOT Ver. 2012.2- Printed: 28-Jun-2013 CLINCH RIVER SMR- CLINCH RIVER PREMIER (JAVIER L) 9.5'-11' CME 550 X (s/n 337153) OP: MEH Test date: 5-Jun-2013 AR: 1.21 inA2 SP: 0.492 klft3 LE: 15.00 ft EM: 30,000 ksi WS: 16 807.9 f/s JC: 0.00 CSI: Max F1 or F2 Compr. Stress DFN: Final Displacement CSX: Max Measured Compr. Stress DMX: Maximum Displacement TSX: Tension Stress Maximum EMX: Max Transferred Energy VMX: Maximum Velocity ETR: Energy Transfer Ratio FMX: Maximum Force BL# depth CSI csx TSX VMX FMX DFN DMX EMX ETR ft ksi ksi ksi f/s kips in in k-ft (%) 5 0.00 21.7 19.4 10.0 17.8 23 1.46 1.46 0.285 81.4 6 0.00 20.9 18.9 9.3 17.2 23 1.31 1.31 0.270 77.2 7 0.00 21.0 19.0 9.5 17.6 23 1.41 1.41 0.272 77.6 8 0.00 21.2 19.0 9.8 17.4 23 1.42 1.42 0.285 81.3 9 0.00 20.9 19.0 9.9 17.5 23 1.49 1.49 0.274 78.3 10 0.00 21.1 19.4 9.9 17.5 23 1.44 1.44 0.284 81.3 11 0.00 21.0 18.9 9.4 17.2 23 1.32 1.32 0.268 76.6 12 0.00 21.3 19.3 9.3 17.4 23 1.47 1.47 0.287 82.1 13 0.00 20.5 18.7 8.5 16.9 23 1.38 1.38 0.268 76.6 14 0.00 20.9 19.1 8.9 17.1 23 1.33 1.33 0.286 81.7 15 0.00 20.0 18.1 8.6 16.0 22 1.02 1.02 0.251 71.7 16 0.00 20.9 19.0 9.1 17.1 23 1.04 1.04 0.274 78.3 17 0.00 21.4 19.1 9.4 16.9 23 0.99 0.99 0.278 79.4 18 0.00 21.2 18.8 9.6 17.0 23 1.03 1.03 0.280 80.1 19 0.00 20.8 19.0 9.9 17.9 23 1.18 1.18 0.286 81.7 20 0.00 20.6 18.7 10.0 17.7 23 0.96 0.96 0.278 79.5 21 0.00 21.4 19.8 10.3 18.5 24 1.07 1.07 0.292 83.4 22 0.00 21.2 19.3 10.1 18.5 23 1.08 1.08 0.291 83.2 23 0.00 21.1 19.2 10.1 18.5 23 1.08 1.08 0.293 83.7 24 0.00 21.2 19.3 10.4 18.7 23 1.16 1.16 0.291 83.3 25 0.00 20.8 18.7 10.2 18.2 23 1.04 1.04 0.271 77.5 Average 21.0 19.0 9.6 17.5 23 1.22 1.22 0.279 79.8 Total number of blows analyzed: 21 Time Summary Drive 52 seconds 12:43:56 PM- 12:44:48 PM (6/5/2013) BN 1-26 RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 44 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-47 of 168
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Pile Driving Analyzer CLINCH RIVER SMR CLINCH RIVER PREMIER (JAVIER L) 3.5'-5' F (44-)~~~====~----------------------------------------------~A~3~4lEF~3~4-, 11 v (2~2) 111 11\ /\ I \ I 'v \ v\
,/V \ } \
TS: TB: WU (44) ==LI====-----------------------------------------------------, D (3.94)-- TS: TB: ft Project Information Quantity Results PROJECT: CLINCH RIVER SMR CSI 20.6 ksi PILE NAME: CLINCH RIVER PREMIER (JAVIER L:CSXi' 18.2 ksi DESCR: CME 550 X (s/n 337153) TSX 6.8 ksi OPERATOR: MEH VMX 18.8 f/s FILE: CLINCH RIVER PREMIER (JAVIER L) 3.5'-~FMXD1 22 kips 6/5/2013 12:14:43 PM DFN 0.90 in Blow Number 18/19 DMX 0.90 in EMX 0.3 k-ft Pile Properties ETR 81.9 (%) LE 9.00 ft AR 1.21 in"'2 Sensors EM 30000 ksi F3: [75AW1] 208.84 (1) SP 0.492 k/ft3 F4: [75AW2] 209.17 (1) WS 16807.9 f/s A3: [K3370] 325 mv/5000g's (1) EA/C 2. 2 ksec/ft A4: [K0686] 315 mv/5000g's (1) 2L/C 1.08 ms CLIP: OK JC [] F3/F4: OK 1.16 V3/V4: OK 0.94 RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 45 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Version 2011.104 Pa e 8.2-48 of 168
10 January 2014 Mr. Steve Criscenzo AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 4021 Stirrup Creek Drive Suite 100 Durham, North Carolina 27703
Subject:
Report of SPT Hammer Energy Measurements Tri-State Drilling CME 75 Drill Rig Rig Serial No. 272567 Automatic Hammer Clinch River SMR Site AMEC Project No. 6468-13-1072 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC) is pleased to present the results of Standard Penetration Test (SPT) hammer energy measurements for the subject drill rig at the Clinch River SMR site in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This report summarizes the field testing activities and presents the results of the hammer energy measurements. SPT Hammer Energy Field Measurements SPT energy measurements were made at the referenced site on June 5, 2013. A separate boring from the planned exploratory borings was used (test hole #4 near MET Tower). Per an approved deviation request testing was performed at depths shallower than those recommended in ASTM D4633-10 due to the presence of relatively shallow rock at the site. The testing was performed by Michael Hamilton, an AMEC representative, from approximately 1:OOPM to 2:00 PM under cloudy skies and an air temperature of about 81 degrees Fahrenheit. The boring was drilled with personnel and equipment from Tri-State Drilling. The drilling equipment consisted of aCME 75 drill rig with an automatic SPT hammer. The drilling tools consisted of AW-J sized drilling rods and a 2-foot long split tube sampler. The drill rig operator during sampling was Glen Bilbrey. Energy measurements were recorded during sampling at the depth intervals shown in Table 1. The energy measurements were performed with a SPT Analyzer (Serial No.3622L) with SPT Analyzer software, accelerometers (Serial Nos. K3370 and K0686) and strain gages (Serial Nos. 75 AW-1 and 75 AW-2). A steel drill rod, 2 feet long and instrumented with dedicated strain gages, was inserted at the top of the drill rod string immediately below the SPT hammer anvil. The inserted rod was also instrumented with two piezoresistive accelerometers that were bolted to the outside of the rod. The instrumented rod insert had a cross-sectional area of approximately 1.21 square inches and an outside diameter of approximately 1.75 inches at the gage location. The drill rods Correspondence: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 2801 Yorkmont Road Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28208 Tel (704) 357-8600 Fax (704) 357-8638 arnec.com RCN: CRP-1215.0 Page 46 of 165 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 8.2-49 of 168}}