ML18354B333

LLC Response to NRC Request for Additional Information No. 132 (Erai No. 8971) on the NuScale Design Certification Application

ML18354B333
Person / Time
Site:	NuScale
Issue date:	12/20/2018
From:	Rad Z NuScale
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of New Reactors
References
RAIO-1218-63955
Download: ML18354B333 (98)

Text

RAIO-1218-63955 December 20, 2018 Docket No.52-048 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738

SUBJECT:

NuScale Power, LLC Response to NRC Request for Additional Information No.

132 (eRAI No. 8971) on the NuScale Design Certification Application

REFERENCES:

1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Request for Additional Information No. 132 (eRAI No. 8971)," dated August 05, 2017

2. NuScale Power, LLC Response to NRC "Request for Additional Information No. 132 (eRAI No.8971)," dated October 2, 2017

3. NuScale Power, LLC Response to NRC "Request for Additional Information No. 132 (eRAI No.8971)," dated April 30, 2018

4. NuScale Power, LLC Response to NRC "Request for Additional Information No. 132 (eRAI No.8971)," dated December 11, 2018 The purpose of this letter is to provide the NuScale Power, LLC (NuScale) response to the referenced NRC Request for Additional Information (RAI).

The Enclosure to this letter contains NuScale's response to the following RAI Question from NRC eRAI No. 8971:

03.08.04-11 The responses to RAI Questions 03.08.04-12, 03.08.04-13, and 03.08.04-14 were previously provided in References 2, 3 and 4. This completes all responses to eRAI 8971.

This letter and the enclosed response make no new regulatory commitments and no revisions to any existing regulatory commitments.

If you have any questions on this response, please contact Marty Bryan at 541-452-7172 or at mbryan@nuscalepower.com.

Sincerely, Zackary W. Rad Director, Regulatory Affairs NuScale Power, LLC NuScale Power, LLC 1100 NE Circle Blvd., Suite 200 Corvalis, Oregon 97330, Office: 541.360.0500, Fax: 541.207.3928 www.nuscalepower.com

RAIO-1218-63955 Distribution: Gregory Cranston, NRC, OWFN-8G9A Samuel Lee, NRC, OWFN-8G9A Marieliz Vera, NRC, OWFN-8G9A : NuScale Response to NRC Request for Additional Information eRAI No. 8971 NuScale Power, LLC 1100 NE Circle Blvd., Suite 200 Corvalis, Oregon 97330, Office: 541.360.0500, Fax: 541.207.3928 www.nuscalepower.com

RAIO-1218-63955 :

NuScale Response to NRC Request for Additional Information eRAI No. 8971 NuScale Power, LLC 1100 NE Circle Blvd., Suite 200 Corvalis, Oregon 97330, Office: 541.360.0500, Fax: 541.207.3928 www.nuscalepower.com

Response to Request for Additional Information Docket No.52-048 eRAI No.: 8971 Date of RAI Issue: 08/05/2017 NRC Question No.: 03.08.04-11 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 1, 2, and 4, provide requirements to be met by SSC important to safety. In accordance with these requirements, DSRS Section 3.8.4 provides review guidance pertaining to the design of seismic Category I structures, other than the containment. Consistent with DSRS Section 3.8.4 Appendix C Sections IV and VI the staff review the design demands for seismic Category I structures.

While the magnitude of bounding demand forces and moments were provided for some critical sections (e.g. FSAR Tables 3B-36 to 3B-38), the FSAR did not provide the magnitudes of bounding demand forces and moments for all critical sections identified for the RXB and CRB.

Provide in the FSAR the magnitude of bounding demand forces and moments for all critical sections, with a breakdown of seismic and static forces and moments.

Additionally, provide a numerical example that demonstrates how the direction of dynamic forces and moments is addressed in the load combinations as to ensure that the direction that is most adverse in a load combination has been considered as indicated in FSAR Section 3B.1.1.2.

NuScale Response:

1.0 Reactor Building Bounding Design Basis Demands The following are the critical sections for shell, frame, and solid elements. For every shell and frame critical section, the summary of D/C ratios is presented first in FSAR, Tier 2 Appendix 3B.

Afterward, the bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are NuScale Nonproprietary

contained in separate tables for the critical sections of the reactor building (RXB) identified.

These tables are provided in the attached FSAR mark-up.

The static, seismic, and design forces and moments are presented, in the attached FSAR mark-up, for the shell elements, per reinforcement configuration, that have the highest D/C ratio for the horizontal reinforcement, vertical reinforcement, XZ-plane shear, and YZ-plane shear.

Therefore, the roof, walls, and slabs defined by critical sections will be represented by up to 4 highlighted shell elements to denote the maximum demand forces and moments used for their design.

The static, seismic, and design forces and moments are presented, in the attached FSAR mark-up, for the frame elements, per reinforcement configuration, that have the highest D/C ratio for moment about the strong axis (axis 3), maximum shear (along axis 2), compression, and tension. Therefore, T-beam, buttress, or pilasters defined by critical sections will be presented by frame elements to denote the maximum demand forces and moments used for their design.

The RXB basemat is added as a critical section and its results are provided as a part of the respone to RAI 8963 03.08.05-6.

Shell Elements:

1.1 Wall at Grid Line 1 A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-2. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-2a and Table 3B-2b.

1.2 Wall at Grid Line 3 A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-3. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-3a and Table 3B-3b.

1.3 Wall at Grid Line 4 A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-8. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-8a and Table 3B-8b.

NuScale Nonproprietary

1.4 Wall at Grid Line 6 A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-11. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-11a and Table 3B-11b.

1.5 Wall at Grid Line E A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-14. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-14a and Table 3B-14b.

1.6 Slab at EL. 100'-0" A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-15. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-15a and Table 3B-15b.

1.7 Roof Slab A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-18. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-18a and Table 3B-18b.

1.8 West Wing Wall at Grid Line 4 A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-22. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-22a and Table 3B-22b.

1.9 Pool Wall at Grid Line B A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-23. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-23a and Table 3B-23b.

NuScale Nonproprietary

Frame Elements:

1.10 Pilasters on Grid Line A A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-19. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-19a and Table 3B-19b.

1.11 Beams on EL. 75'-0" Slab A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-20. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-20a and Table 3B-20b.

1.12 Buttress at Grid Line 1 on EL. 126'-0" Slab A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-21. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-21a and Table 3B-21b.

NuScale Nonproprietary

2.0 CRB Bounding Design Basis Demands The following are the critical sections for shell, frame, and solid elements. For every shell and frame critical section, the summary of D/C ratios is presented first in Appendix 3B. Afterward, the bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are contained in separate tables for the critical sections of the CRB. These tables are provided in the attached FSAR mark-up.

The static, seismic, and design forces and moments are presented, in the attached FSAR mark-up, for the shell elements, per reinforcement configuration, that have the highest D/C ratio for horizontal reinforcement, vertical reinforcement, XZ-plane shear, and YZ-plane shear.

Therefore, the roof, walls, and slabs defined by critical sections will be represented by up to 4 highlighted shell elements to denote the maximum demand forces and moments used for their design.

The static, seismic, and design forces and moments are presented, in the attached FSAR mark-up, for the frame elements, per reinforcement configuration, that have the highest D/C ratio for moment axis 3, shear axis 2, compression, and tension. Therefore, T-beams and pilasters defined by critical sections will be presented by frame elements to denote the maximum demand forces and moments used for their design.

Shell Elements:

2.1 Wall at Grid Line 3 A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-29. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-29a and Table 3B-29b.

2.2 Wall at Grid Line 4 A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-30. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-30a and Table 3B-30b.

NuScale Nonproprietary

2.3 Wall at Grid Line A A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-33. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-33a and Table 3B-33b.

2.4 Slab at EL. 100'-0" A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-43. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-43a and Table 3B-43b.

Frame Elements:

2.5 Pilasters on Grid Line 1 A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-49. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-49a and Table 3B-49b.

2.7 T-Beams on EL. 120'-0" Slab A summary table of the D/C ratios is presented in FSAR Table 3B-50. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments have been added as FSAR Table 3B-50a and Table 3B-50b.

NuScale Nonproprietary

Solid Elements:

2.8 Perimeter of CRB Basemat Foundation Slab It is noted that the final design forces and moments, added as FSAR Table 3B-37a, are not a direct summation of the forces and moments from FSAR Table 3B-37b. After combining the static and seismic results, all values were increased by 5% to account for accidental torsion.

The location of perimeter, interior, and tunnel area of the CRB foundation are presented in Figure 2-1.

2.9 Interior of CRB Basemat Foundation Slab It is noted that the final design forces and moments, added as FSAR Table 3B-38a, are not a direct summation of the forces and moments from FSAR Table 3B-38b, as described in Section 2.8.

2.10 Basemat Foundation of CRB Tunnel It is noted that the final design forces and moments, added as FSAR Table 3B-39a, are not a direct summation of the forces and moments from FSAR Table 3B-39b, as described in Section 2.8.

NuScale Nonproprietary

Figure 2-1. CRB Basemat View of Finite Element Model.

NuScale Nonproprietary

3.0 Numerical Example on Load Combinations The design check approach uses load combinations that involve both static and dynamic load cases from the results of SAP2000 and SASSI2010 to obtain final, design element forces and moments. The dynamic forces and moments are reversible (not monotonic) and hence the direction that is most adverse in a load combination is considered.

The seismic results calculated by SASSI2010 are combined with the static results calculated by SAP2000. (Note that seismic (and hydrodynamic for RXB) results can be positive or negative.)

1. By the algebraic sum, by assuming all seismic (and hydrodynamic for RXB) results are positive:

Static + (Seismic + Hydrodynamic)

2. By the algebraic sum, by assuming all seismic (and hydrodynamic for RXB) results are negative:

Static - (Seismic + Hydrodynamic)

3. By the absolute sum of static and seismic (and hydrodynamic for RXB) results:

Abs(Static) + (Seismic+Hydrodynamic)

For the in-plane axial forces, Sxx and Syy, the first two combination methods give the actual ranges so that the actual tension/compression forces in the structural members for design are known, rather than treating all maximum in-plane forces to be in tension. All in- and out-of-plane shear forces and bending moments are obtained by the third method, or the absolute sum method, since design is sign-independent.

Table 3-1 is generated for Shell Element 16128 in RXB Wall at Grid Line 3 to illustrate the aforementioned methodology.

Table 3-1. Shell Element 16128 in RXB Wall at Grid Line 3 Demand Forces and Moments Loads and Load Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz Combinations (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static -198 -36 -92 -5 -1 2 -1 0 Dynamic 585 164 233 71 12 5 12 8 Hydrodynamic 50 7 16 3 0 0 0 0 Maximum Membrane Tension 436 135 342 80 13 8 13 8 (Sxx & Syy)

Maximum Membrane -833 -206 Compression (Sxx & Syy)

NuScale Nonproprietary

Impact on DCA:

FSAR Tier 2, Appendix 3B has been revised as described in the response above and as shown in the markup provided in this response.

NuScale Nonproprietary

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details When individual elements exceed design requirements, the region is evaluated. Often, more accurate design moments and forces are obtained by averaging the results of several elements. If this approach is inappropriate for the location (or does not produce acceptable results) additional reinforcing is added to increase section capacity.

The summary tables of D/C ratios at each gridline shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. If necessary, a separate check of averaging for walls that contain elements exceeding the in-plane shear limit, or contain elements that exceed shear friction limits is performed to ensure the D/C ratios are acceptable.

In-plane shear for the adequacy of concrete wall thickness is checked for all elements in the RXB. Several individual elements in the wall at grid line 3 encountered In-plane shear exceedances. Where individual elements in the wall exceed in-plane shear limits, the elements are averaged as shown in Table 3B-51. The cross-section was checked based on calculating the average in plane shear over the entire wall section, and is acceptable. Note that the example in Table 3B-51 is a different element than shown in Table 3B-4 through Table 3B-6.

Shear friction is also checked for all elements in the RXB. Some individual elements in the wall at grid line 3 encountered shear friction exceedances. An example of averaging over additional elements is shown in Table 3B-52. The example in Table 3B-52 is a different element than shown in Table 3B-4 through Table 3B-6.

3B.2.2.1 Wall at Grid Line 1 The wall at grid line 1 is an exterior structural wall on the west side of the RXB. This wall is 5 feet thick. The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-7, along with the shell element labels.

RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17 This wall uses 5000 psi concrete below grade and 7000 psi concrete above grade.

RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17 Reinforcement drawings and section details are presented in Figure 3B-8 and Figure 3B-9.

RAI 03.08.04-11 A summary table of the element-based design check results for the wall at grid line 1 is presented in Table 3B-2. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. All design check zones have no D/C exceedances.

The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-2a and Table 3B-2b. Based on the above results and evaluations, the wall is acceptable.

3B.2.2.2 Wall at Grid Line 3 The wall at grid line 3 consists of a 5 foot thick weir wall for the pool and a 4 foot thick upper stiffener located near the roof level. The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-10, along with the shell element labels.

Tier 2 3B-18 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details Reinforcement drawings and section details are presented in Figure 3B-11 through Figure 3B-13.

RAI 03.08.04-11 A summary table of the element-based design check results for the wall at grid line 3 is presented in Table 3B-3. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone and highlights those design check zones that exceed a D/C ratio of 0.8. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-3a and Table 3B-3b. Table 3B-4, Table 3B-5, and Table 3B-6 show the element averaging for the horizontal reinforcement, the horizontal membrane compression stress, and the vertical reinforcement, respectively. Table 3B-7 provides a summary of D/C ratios after averaging the affected elements. The method of averaging of the demand membrane forces, in-plane shear and out-of-plane moments (used for determination of D/C ratios in terms of reinforcing steel), and out-of-plane shears (used for determination of D/C ratios for shear) over a length of nominally 4 times the thickness of the wall is described in Section 3B.1.1.1. As shown in Table 3B-7, with this further distribution of demand, all D/C ratios are acceptable.

3B.2.2.3 Wall at Grid Line 4 The wall at grid line 4 is an interior wall of the RXB with two different thicknesses.

The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-14, along with the shell element labels.

Reinforcement drawings and section details are presented in Figure 3B-15 through Figure 3B-17.

RAI 03.08.04-11 A summary table of the element-based design check results for the wall at grid line 4 is presented in Table 3B-8. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone and highlights those design check zones that exceed a D/C ratio of 0.8. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-8a and Table 3B-8b. Table 3B-9 shows the element averaging for the horizontal reinforcement exceedance indicated in Table 3B-8. Table 3B-10 provides a summary of D/C ratios after averaging. As shown in Table 3B-10, with this further distribution of demand, all D/C ratios are acceptable.

3B.2.2.4 Wall at Grid Line 6 The walls at grid line 6 consist of several wall thicknesses. The upper stiffener wall located near the roof is 4 feet thick. The pool wall section has two section thicknesses, 7.5 feet and 5 feet. The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-18, along with the shell element labels.

Reinforcement drawings and section details are presented in Figure 3B-19 through Figure 3B-21.

RAI 03.08.04-11 Tier 2 3B-19 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details A summary table of the element-based design check results for the wall at grid line 6 is presented in Table 3B-11. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-11a and Table 3B-11b. The highlighted entries indicate those D/C ratios that exceed 1.0. Table 3B-12 shows the element averaging for the horizontal reinforcement exceedance in Table 3B-11.

Table 3B-13 provides a summary of D/C ratios after averaging. As shown in Table 3B-13, with this further distribution of demand, all D/C ratios are acceptable.

3B.2.2.5 Wall at Grid Line E The wall at grid line E is an exterior structural wall on the south side of the RXB that is 5 feet thick. The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-22, along with the shell element labels.

Reinforcement drawings, details, and sketches are presented in Figure 3B-23 and Figure 3B-24.

RAI 03.08.04-11 A summary table of the element-based design check results for the wall at grid line E is presented in Table 3B-14. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. All design check zones have no D/C exceedances.

The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-14a and Table 3B-14b. Based on the above results and evaluations, the wall is acceptable.

3B.2.3 Design Approach - Slabs The slabs are designed using the same methodology as was used for the walls in Section 3B.1.1. The design check determines the D/C ratios for the north-south and east-west slab reinforcement including the various shear failure modes based on the combined demand forces and moments.

An iterative design check approach is used to determine the appropriate uniform reinforcement pattern for a given slab section based on the maximum combined design forces and moments. A representative slab shell element within the design check zone selected to demonstrate the element-based design check that is repeated for all shell elements within this slab. The demand forces and moments for the shell element in the design check zone combines the non-seismic (SAP2000) and seismic (SASSI2010) design value for performing the element-based design check.

The summary table of D/C ratios at each slab elevation shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. A separate check of averaging for slabs that contain elements exceeding the in-plane shear limit, or that contain elements exceeding shear friction limits is performed to ensure the D/C ratios are acceptable.

Tier 2 3B-20 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details 3B.2.3.1 Slab at EL. 100'-0" The slab at EL. 100'-0" is at grade level and is 3 feet thick. The outer and inner perimeter of the slab is reinforced with shear reinforcement. The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-25, along with the shell element labels.

Reinforcement drawings and section details is presented in Figure 3B-26 and Figure 3B-27.

RAI 03.08.04-11 A summary table of the element-based design check results for the slab at EL 100'-0" is presented in Table 3B-15. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone and highlights the XZ plane shear exceedance. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-15a and Table 3B-15b. Table 3B-16 shows the element averaging for that exceedance. Table 3B-17 provides a summary of D/C ratios after averaging. Based upon the results shown in Table 3B-17, the slab at EL.

100'-0" is acceptable.

3B.2.3.2 Slab at EL. 181'-0" The roof slab is a 4 foot thick slab that begins at EL. 163'-0", slopes inward for 29.5 feet, and is flat at EL. 181'-0". The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-28, along with the shell element labels.

Reinforcement drawings and section details are presented in Figure 3B-29 and Figure 3B-30.

RAI 03.08.04-11 A summary table of the element-based design check results for the roof slab is presented in Table 3B-18. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. All design check zones have no D/C exceedances.

The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-18a and Table 3B-18b. Based on the above results and evaluations, the roof slab is acceptable.

3B.2.3.3 Pilasters RAI 03.08.04-4 Pilasters are used around the perimeter of the RXB exterior walls and at two locations inside the pool walls from elevation 50'-0" to elevation 100'-0" at grid line

3. The RXB pilasters strengthen the RXB exterior walls by resisting the following types of loading:

RAI 03.08.04-4

1) axial tension and compression RAI 03.08.04-4

2) lateral shear loading in both the north-south and east-west directions Tier 2 3B-21 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details 3B.2.4 Pilasters at Grid Line A The pilasters on the wall at grid line A consist of five types of pilaster. The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-31, along with the pilaster frame element labels.

Reinforcement details are presented in Figure 3B-32 through Figure 3B-36 for the five pilaster types.

RAI 03.08.04-11 A summary table of the design check results for the pilasters on the wall at grid line A is presented in Table 3B-19. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. All design check zones have no D/C exceedances and the results acceptable. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-19a and Table 3B-19b.

3B.2.5 Beams A detailed explanation of the methodology for the design evaluation of the concrete walls and slabs, also applicable to the beams in the RXB is presented in Section 3B.1.2.

The SAP2000 and SASSI2010 combined design forces and moments are used in the design check. The design check determines the D/C ratios for the various failure modes based on the combined demand forces and moments.

An iterative design check approach is used to determine the appropriate uniform reinforcement pattern on each beam type based on the maximum combined design forces and moments. A representative beam frame element within the design check zone is selected to demonstrate the frame element design check that is repeated for all beam frame elements within this group.

The beams in the RXB are designed for strong axis bending and strong axis shear only.

This is due to the very long span in the weak axis direction (along the plane of the slabs) that prevents the beams from failing. Similarly, the beams cannot realistically fail in torsion due to the fact that they are embedded into the 3 foot thick RXB slabs.

Therefore, torsion is also not considered.

The summary table of D/C ratios at each slab elevation shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone.

RAI 03.08.04-11 3B.2.5.1 Beams at EL. 75'-0" The slab at EL. 75-0 contains six beam sections running east-west and 22 beam sections running north-south. The SAP2000 analysis model plan view is shown in Figure 3B-37, along with the frame element labels.

The reinforcement details are shown in Figure 3B-38 and Figure 3B-39.

RAI 03.08.04-11 Tier 2 3B-23 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details A summary table of the design check results for the beams at EL. 75-0" is presented in Table 3B-20. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. The D/C ratios are less than 1.0 and therefore the beams are acceptable. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-20a and Table 3B-20b.

3B.2.6 Buttresses A detailed explanation of the methodology for the design evaluation of the walls and slabs, also applicable to the buttresses in the RXB is presented in Section 3B.1.2. The SAP2000 analysis model is used to determine the maximum non-seismic demand results for each buttress frame element. Similarly, the SASSI2010 analysis model is used to determine the seismic demand results, which are then combined with the SAP2000 results for each buttress frame element. The SAP2000 and SASSI2010 combined design forces and moments are used in the design check. The design check determines the D/C ratios for the various failure modes based on the combined demand forces and moments.

An iterative design check approach is used to determine the appropriate uniform reinforcement pattern on each buttress type based on the maximum combined design forces and moments. A representative element within the design check zone is selected to demonstrate the frame element design check that is repeated for all elements within this group.

The buttresses in the RXB are designed for strong axis bending and strong axis shear only. This is due to the very long span in the weak axis direction (along the plane of the slabs) that prevents the buttresses from failing. Similarly, the buttresses cannot realistically fail in torsion due to the fact that they are embedded into the 5 foot thick RXB slabs. Therefore, torsion is also not considered.

3B.2.6.1 Buttress at EL. 126'-0" The wall at grid line 1 has two buttresses. These are at elevations 126'-0" and 145'-6". The buttress at EL. 126'-0" is evaluated. The SAP2000 analysis model plan view is shown in Figure 3B-40, along with the frame element labels.

The reinforcement details are shown in Figure 3B-41.

RAI 03.08.04-11 A summary table of the design check results for the beams at elevation 126-0" is presented in Table 3B-21. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. The D/C ratios are less than 1.0 and therefore the buttress is acceptable. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-21a and Table 3B-21b.

3B.2.7 NuScale Power Module Bay The NPM bays are 3-walled compartments located in the reactor pool and are designed to house the NPMs during operation. Each bay is 20'-6" wide in the north-south Tier 2 3B-24 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details direction and 19'-7" deep in the east-west direction, and extends from the pool floor at EL. 25'-0" up to EL. 125'-0". The bottom of the bay is the RXB foundation slab. The walls which make up the bay are 5 feet thick reinforced concrete. The top of the bay is capped with the Bioshield during operation. The bay provides restraints to prevent the NPM from moving laterally. Restraint is provided via a NPM skirt restraint located at EL.

25-0" and lug restraints located on the three bay walls at EL. 71'-7".

3B.2.7.1 West Wing Wall The west wing wall is one of the walls at grid line 4. The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-42, along with the shell element labels. The west wing walls have the refueling pool on one side and an NPM located on the other. (See Figure 3B-52). Because of this location, it experiences the highest forces of the NPM bay wing walls.

Reinforcement drawings and section details are presented in Figure 3B-43 and Figure 3B-44.

RAI 03.08.04-11 A summary table of the element-based design check results for the wall at Grid Line 4 is presented in Table 3B-22. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. All design check zones have no D/C exceedances.

The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-22a and Table 3B-22b. Based on the above results and evaluations, the west wing wall is acceptable.

3B.2.7.2 Pool Wall The portion of the pool wall that supports the NPMs is part of the wall at grid line B.

This is an interior wall of the RXB that is 5 feet thick. The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-45, along with the shell element labels.

Reinforcement drawings and section details are presented in Figure 3B-46 and Figure 3B-47.

RAI 03.08.04-11 A summary table of the element-based design check results for the wall at grid line B is presented in Table 3B-23. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone and highlights the YZ plane shear exceedance. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-23a and Table 3B-23b. Table 3B-24 shows the element averaging for that exceedance. Table 3B-25 provides a summary of D/C ratios after averaging.

RAI 03.07.02-20, RAI 03.08.04-31 3B.2.7.3 NuScale Power Module Passive Support Ring Assembly RAI 03.07.02-20 Tier 2 3B-25 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details 3B.3.2 Walls 3B.3.2.1 Wall at Grid Line 3 The wall at grid line 3 is an interior structural wall between EL. 50'-0" and EL.

120'-0" of the CRB. This wall is 2 feet thick. The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-65, along with the shell element labels.

Reinforcement drawings and details are presented in Figure 3B-66 and Figure 3B-67.

RAI 03.08.04-11, RAI 03.08.04-36 A summary table of the element-based design check results for the wall at grid line 3 is presented in Table 3B-29. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. As shown in Table 3B-29, all design check zones have no D/C exceedances. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-29a and Table 3B-29b. Based on the above results and evaluations, the wall is acceptable.

3B.3.2.2 Wall at Grid Line 4 The wall at grid line 4 is an exterior structural wall on the east side of the CRB that is 3 feet thick. The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-68, along with the shell element labels.

Reinforcement drawings and details are presented in Figure 3B-69 and Figure 3B-70.

RAI 03.08.04-11, RAI 03.08.04-36 A summary table of the element-based design check results for the wall at grid line 4 is presented in Table 3B-30. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. As shown in Table 3B-30, certain design check zones have D/C ratios in excess of 1.0. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-30a and Table 3B-30b.

RAI 03.08.04-36 The wall at grid line 4 was experiencing out of plane shear exceedances in the YZ plane as shown in Table 3B-30. In order to satisfy the demand, the section experiencing high out of plane shear was reinforced with an additional #6 stirrup leg. This is shown in Figure 3B-70. Table 3B-31 shows the design check of the worst shell element in the section, number 786, with the additional shear reinforcement.

The final design check is provided in Table 3B-31. Based on Table 3B-32, where the capacity includes the added reinforcement, the wall at grid line 4 is acceptable.

3B.3.2.3 Wall at Grid Line A The wall at grid line A is an exterior structural wall on the north side of the CRB that is 3 feet thick. The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-71, along with the shell element labels.

Tier 2 3B-34 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details Reinforcement drawings and details are presented in Figure 3B-72 and Figure 3B-73.

RAI 03.08.04-11, RAI 03.08.04-36 A summary table of the element-based design check results for the wall at grid line A are presented in Table 3B-33. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. Based on Table 3B-33, all design check zones have no D/C exceedances. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-33a and Table 3B-33b. Based on the above results and evaluations, the wall is acceptable.

RAI 03.08.04-36 In-plane shear for the adequacy of concrete wall thickness was checked for all elements in the CRB. Several individual elements in the walls encountered in-plane shear exceedances. Where individual elements in the wall at grid line A exceed in-plane shear limits, the elements are averaged as shown in Table 3B-34. The cross-section was checked based on calculating the average in-plane shear over the entire wall section, and is acceptable.

3B.3.3 Slabs 3B.3.3.1 Basemat Foundation RAI 03.08.04-36 The reinforced concrete section for the basemat is comprised of a 5 foot thick concrete slab with 3 layers of #11 bars at 12" centers each way top and bottom for main reinforcing steel, and 2 legged stirrups of #6 bars at 12" centers each way. The perimeter of the main slab contains 4 layers of #11 bars at 12" centers each way top and bottom for main reinforcing steel, and 2 legged stirrups of #6 bars at 12" centers each way. The capacity of the sections used is presented Table 3B-35 and Table 3B-36.

Figure 3B-74 shows the three zones: Tunnel Area, Perimeter Area and Interior Area, used for design of the basemat. Figure 3B-74 also shows the CRB basemat solid element numbering in the CRB finite element model. Reinforcement drawings are shown in Figure 3B-75 and Figure 3B-76.

For evaluation, total area of reinforcing steel required for axial tension, in-plane shear, and out-of-plane moment is considered. In addition, reduction of out-of-plane shear capacity of concrete due to axial tension is considered.

For the design check, bounding demand forces and moments for the basemat are considered at the following locations:

1) Basemat for the perimeter of the main CRB structure

2) Basemat for the interior of the main CRB structure

3) Basemat for CRB tunnel Tier 2 3B-35 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11, RAI 03.08.04-36 Table 3B-37Table 3B-37b showsprovides the magnitudes of bounding demand forces and moments used for the design check of the perimeter of the basemat of the CRB structure. Table 3B-38Table 3B-38b showsprovides the magnitudes of bounding demand forces and moments used for the design check of the interior of the basemat of the main CRB structure. Table 3B-39Table 3B-39b provides the magnitudes of bounding demand for the basemat of the CRB tunnel.

RAI 03.08.04-11, RAI 03.08.04-36 The demand forces and moments for the perimeter of the main CRB foundation evaluation are listed in Table 3B-37Table 3B-37a and Table 3B-37b. The design check for the various failure modes of the main CRB foundation perimeter are shown in Table 3B-40.

RAI 03.08.04-11, RAI 03.08.04-36 The demand forces and moments for the main interior part of the CRB foundation evaluation are listed in Table 3B-38Table 3B-38a and Table 3B-38b. The design check for the various failure modes of the main CRB foundation interior are shown in Table 3B-41.

RAI 03.08.04-11, RAI 03.08.04-36 Likewise, the demand forces and moments for the CRB foundation tunnel are listed in Table 3B-39Table 3B-39a and Table 3B-39b. The design check for the various failure modes of the CRB foundation tunnel are shown in Table 3B-42.

3B.3.3.2 Slab EL. 100'-0" The slab at EL. 100'-0" is at grade and houses the main technical support and data area for the CRB. This elevation consists of a 3' slab and 2' slab along with a 3' tunnel slab. The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-77, along with the shell element labels.

Reinforcement drawings and details are presented in Figure 3B-78 and Figure 3B-79.

RAI 03.08.04-11, RAI 03.08.04-36 A summary table of the element-based design check results for the slab at EL.

100'-0" is presented in Table 3B-43. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-43a and Table 3B-43b.

Table 3B-47 provides a summary of D/C ratios after averaging. The tables showing the averaging performed are Table 3B-44 through Table 3B-46.

RAI 03.08.04-36 Shear friction was checked for all elements in the CRB. Some individual elements in the slabs encountered shear friction exceedances. For elements that exceed shear friction limits in the slab at EL. 100'-0", their averaging is shown in Table 3B-48.

Tier 2 3B-36 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details 3B.3.4 Pilasters 3B.3.4.1 Pilasters Grid Line 1 The pilasters on the wall at grid line 1 consist of two types of pilasters. The SAP2000 analysis model elevation view is shown in Figure 3B-80, along with the pilaster frame element labels.

Reinforcement details are presented in Figure 3B-81 and Figure 3B-82 for pilaster Type 1 and Type 2, respectively.

RAI 03.08.04-11, RAI 03.08.04-36 A summary table of the design check results for the pilasters on the wall at Grid Line 1 is presented in Table 3B-49. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. As noted in Table 3B-49, all design check zones have D/C ratios that are less than 1.0; and therefore, the pilasters are acceptable.The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-49a and Table 3B-49b.

3B.3.5 T-Beams 3B.3.5.1 T-Beams at EL. 120'-0" The slab at elevation 120'-0" contains six T-beam sections running east-west and two T-beam sections running north-south. The SAP2000 analysis model plan view is shown in Figure 3B-83, along with the frame element labels.

The reinforcement details are shown in Figure 3B-84 and Figure 3B-85 for Type 1 and Type 2, respectively.

RAI 03.08.04-11, RAI 03.08.04-36 A summary table of the design check results for the beams at elevation 120'-0" is presented in Table 3B-50. This summary table shows the maximum D/C ratios within each design check zone. As shown in Table 3B-50, all design check zones have D/C ratios that are less than 1.0; therefore the T-Beams at elevation 120'-0" are all acceptable. The bounding static, dynamic (seismic), and final design forces and moments are shown in Table 3B-50a and Table 3B-50b.

3B.4 References 3B-1 SAP2000 Advanced (Version 17.1.1) [Computer Program]. (2015). Walnut Creek, CA: Computers and Structures, Inc.

3B-2 SASSI2010 (Version 1.0) [Computer Program]. (2012). Berkeley, CA.

3B-3 American Concrete Institute, "Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures and Commentary," ACI 349-06, Farmington Hills, MI.

Tier 2 3B-37 Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17 Table 3B-2: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Wall at Grid Line 1 Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Reinf. Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Stress Stress Checked RXB;1;E-D;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.35 0.11 0.62 0.49 0.49 0.39 20 Element 2580 2581 2578 2577 3902 2578 RXB;1;D-C;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.26 0.10 0.30 0.32 0.33 0.47 24 Element 3907 3221 2583 2583 3221 2583 RXB;1;C-B;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.25 0.08 0.28 0.32 0.36 0.51 24 Element 3918 2593 2592 2592 3232 2591 RXB;1;B-A;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.34 0.11 0.53 0.44 0.54 0.37 20 Element 2595 3923 2597 2598 3923 2595 RXB;1;E-D;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.32 0.09 0.41 0.36 0.41 0.07 20 Element 7729 5575 7725 5575 5575 7727 RXB;1;D-C;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.30 0.07 0.32 0.23 0.28 0.34 24 3.B-40 Element 7730 5581 7735 5585 6139 7734 RXB;1;C-B;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.35 0.08 0.39 0.23 0.28 0.31 24 Element 7737 5590 7736 5591 6150 5588 RXB;1;B-A;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.29 0.09 0.46 0.38 0.44 0.18 20 Element 7746 5596 7746 6155 5596 5593 RXB;1;E-D;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.38 0.15 0.62 0.40 0.33 0.09 14 Element 8843 8843 10386 10386 8839 11155 Design Reports and Critical Section Details RXB;1;D-C;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.45 0.14 0.46 0.27 0.19 0.37 24 Element 10391 10391 10392 10392 10391 10391 RXB;1;D-C;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.45 0.14 0.46 0.27 0.19 0.37 24 Element 10391 10391 10392 10392 10391 10392 RXB;1;C-B;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.83 0.29 0.71 0.25 0.13 0.31 22 Element 11167 11167 11167 9442 11166 10393 RXB;1;B-A;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.36 0.12 0.45 0.36 0.34 0.15 20 Draft Revision 3 Element 11172 11172 11176 8860 8860 11173 RXB;1;E-D;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.33 0.04 0.41 0.19 0.17 0.08 20 Element 12319 12318 12316 12315 12315 12315 RXB;1;D-C;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.47 0.10 0.42 0.09 0.10 0.08 24 Element 13542 13542 12322 12320 13537 12325

Table 3B-2: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Wall at Grid Line 1 (Continued)

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Reinf. Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Stress Stress Checked RXB;1;C-B;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.64 0.19 0.87 0.41 0.10 0.14 8 Element 12326 12326 13544 13544 13544 12326 RXB;1;B-A;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.45 0.10 0.49 0.20 0.21 0.09 20 Element 13545 13545 12717 12332 12331 12331 RXB;1;E-D;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.22 0.02 0.27 0.12 0.32 0.27 20 Element 14613 15238 14612 14609 15580 15580 RXB;1;D-C;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.37 0.10 0.31 0.09 0.17 0.15 24 Element 14619 14619 14614 14929 15581 15581 RXB;1;C-B;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.62 0.15 0.66 0.29 0.21 0.24 24 Element 14621 14621 14625 14625 15592 15592 RXB;1;B-A;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.30 0.09 0.31 0.16 0.35 0.33 20 Element 14626 14626 14626 14936 15593 15593 RXB;1;E-D;145-163 D/C Ratio 0.20 0.01 0.23 0.07 0.32 0.08 20 3.B-41 Element 16645 16944 16046 16044 16047 16047 RXB;1;D-C;145-163 D/C Ratio 0.33 0.01 0.34 0.08 0.12 0.08 24 Element 16651 16950 16352 16048 16048 16048 RXB;1;C-B;145-163 D/C Ratio 0.46 0.03 0.51 0.12 0.11 0.09 24 Element 16058 16059 16058 16059 16059 16059 RXB;1;B-A;145-163 D/C Ratio 0.26 0.02 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.08 20 Element 16658 16359 16359 16060 16060 16060 Design Reports and Critical Section Details RXB;1;E-D;163-181 D/C Ratio 0.20 0.03 0.20 0.06 0.16 0.18 14 Element 17248 14893 17245 17245 17245 17245 RXB;1;D-C;163-181 D/C Ratio 0.38 0.04 0.43 0.07 0.13 0.16 24 Element 17949 17949 17949 17949 17944 17948 RXB;1;C-B;163-181 D/C Ratio 0.40 0.03 0.47 0.08 0.14 0.16 24 Element 17257 17950 17950 17950 17955 17951 RXB;1;B-A;163-181 D/C Ratio 0.24 0.08 0.23 0.07 0.14 0.05 14 Draft Revision 3 Element 17541 15191 17261 17264 17956 17570

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-2a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Wall at Grid Line 1 Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static 2580 -47 -197 -21 13 -22 -21 -6 -29 2578 -47 -203 -41 3 -21 27 -2 -26 3923 -69 -230 19 -136 -13 1 -42 2 2591 -37 -232 -2 12 -78 -21 -2 -63 11167 -16 -53 -28 -13 -28 9 0 -5 8860 -25 -142 4 -90 -18 6 -20 2 10392 -20 -110 -4 7 9 6 -6 5 12326 -18 -121 -19 -2 8 6 1 1 13544 -8 -120 -19 1 1 1 1 0 15593 11 -58 6 -5 -31 6 -8 11 16058 9 -36 -11 1 -9 3 1 3 3.B-42 16060 11 -44 9 6 1 6 -7 -1 17245 12 -9 -5 -3 -22 12 -6 -6 Dynamic 2580 83 239 282 64 115 34 22 15 2578 60 552 163 69 123 37 12 32 3923 126 350 176 213 38 26 69 13 2591 51 199 175 46 95 17 8 40 11167 485 370 531 100 67 27 13 9 Design Reports and Critical Section Details 8860 96 460 174 225 28 27 43 6 10392 137 328 344 67 111 12 27 55 12326 440 434 428 17 57 16 8 19 13544 346 837 394 44 46 28 12 15 15593 18 285 165 40 26 18 62 42 16058 57 153 387 59 31 21 22 4 16060 46 211 165 57 28 35 65 14 Draft Revision 3 17245 37 139 117 55 31 49 27 30

Table 3B-2a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Wall at Grid Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Line 1 (Continued)

Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Hydrodynamic 2580 6 55 2 0 4 1 0 2 2578 3 59 0 0 4 1 0 1 3923 0 60 4 3 1 0 1 0 2591 8 62 3 1 8 1 0 3 11167 10 13 8 1 4 3 0 2 8860 5 30 3 3 1 1 2 0 10392 6 31 0 2 1 1 1 1 12326 1 36 2 1 4 1 0 0 13544 1 36 3 2 1 1 0 0 15593 4 18 2 1 8 2 2 3 16058 3 10 3 1 2 1 0 1 16060 3 14 2 2 1 2 2 0 17245 1 3 0 0 5 2 1 1 3.B-43 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-2b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for RXB Wall at Grid Line 1 Element Sxx MAX Sxx MIN Syy MAX Syy MIN Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) 2580 43 -136 97 -490 306 78 141 55 29 45 2578 17 -111 407 -814 205 73 149 64 14 60 3923 57 -195 180 -639 199 352 52 28 111 15 2591 22 -95 29 -493 180 59 182 38 9 107 11167 479 -512 330 -435 567 113 99 39 14 16 8860 77 -126 348 -632 181 318 48 34 65 9 10392 123 -163 250 -469 349 76 121 20 34 61 12326 423 -460 348 -590 449 20 69 23 10 21 13544 338 -354 753 -992 417 47 48 30 14 15 15593 33 -12 245 -361 173 46 64 25 72 56 16058 69 -52 127 -199 401 60 42 25 24 8 16060 60 -38 181 -269 176 66 30 43 74 15 3.B-44 17245 49 -25 134 -151 123 58 58 62 34 36 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17, RAI 03.08.04-34 Table 3B-3: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Wall at Grid Line 3 Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Reinf. Stress Stress Checked RXB;3;D-C;24-50 D/C Ratio 1.44 1.04 1.40 0.72 0.60 0.26 84 Element 4951 4942 4951 4951 4942 4946 RXB;3;E-D;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.29 0.07 0.43 0.14 0.05 0.09 2 Element 15318 15318 15318 15318 15655 15655 RXB;3;B-A;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.29 0.07 0.44 0.15 0.05 0.08 2 Element 15319 15319 15319 15319 15656 15656 RXB;3;E-D;145-163 D/C Ratio 1.19 0.60 0.71 0.16 0.10 0.06 16 Element 16128 16128 16128 16131 16128 16131 RXB;3;B-A;145-163 D/C Ratio 1.20 0.60 0.72 0.16 0.09 0.06 16 Element 16135 16135 16135 16132 16135 16132 RXB;3;E-D;163-181 D/C Ratio 0.25 0.10 0.44 0.08 0.08 0.05 10 3.B-45 Element 14897 17545 15226 17545 17707 17573 RXB;3;B-A;163-181 D/C Ratio 0.29 0.10 0.43 0.08 0.08 0.05 10 Element 14898 17546 15227 17546 17708 17574 Note:

Highlighted items indicate those design check zones that exceed a D/C ratio of 0.8.

Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-3a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Wall at Grid Line 3 Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static 4951 -78 -41 -46 21 -1 2 1 2 4942 -758 -329 432 9 3 -4 0 0 4946 -144 -4 21 5 0 -1 0 0 16135 -197 -36 92 -7 -1 -2 1 0 16128 -198 -36 -92 -5 -1 2 -1 0 15655 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dynamic 4951 1,234 1,196 783 247 38 89 74 25 4942 1,043 453 523 225 31 45 85 29 4946 290 111 50 278 29 14 24 44 16135 586 165 235 65 11 5 11 8 16128 585 164 233 71 12 5 12 8 3.B-46 15655 34 181 118 6 30 4 9 13 Hydrodynamic 4951 5 10 3 0 1 0 0 0 4942 7 47 24 0 1 0 0 0 4946 20 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 16135 51 7 17 3 0 0 0 0 16128 50 7 16 3 0 0 0 0 15655 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-3b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for RXB Wall at Grid Line 3 Element Sxx MAX Sxx MIN Syy MAX Syy MIN Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) 4951 1,161 -1,317 1,166 -1,248 833 268 40 92 75 27 4942 293 -1,808 172 -829 978 234 36 50 86 30 4946 165 -454 107 -116 73 284 29 15 24 45 16135 440 -835 137 -208 344 75 12 7 12 8 16128 436 -833 135 -206 342 80 13 8 13 8 15655 34 -34 181 -181 118 6 30 4 9 13 3.B-47 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17, RAI 03.08.04-34 Table 3B-8: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Wall at Grid Line 4 Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Reinf. Stress Stress Checked RXB;4;D-C;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.40 0.19 0.68 0.76 0.24 0.83 16 Element 4638 4638 3071 3071 4638 3071 RXB;4;C-B;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.38 0.17 0.67 0.74 0.25 0.82 16 Element 4645 4645 3072 3072 4645 3072 RXB;4;D-C;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.38 0.22 0.62 0.42 0.46 0.39 20 Element 8070 8070 8073 5781 7300 7300 RXB;4;C-B;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.40 0.22 0.62 0.42 0.50 0.42 20 Element 8077 8077 8074 5782 7307 7307 RXB;4;D-C;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.32 0.18 0.61 0.40 0.39 0.41 16 Element 11582 9082 9678 9678 11582 11585 RXB;4;C-B;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.33 0.18 0.61 0.41 0.41 0.44 16 Element 11589 9089 9679 9679 11589 11586 3.B-52 RXB;4;D-C;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.95 0.35 0.48 0.29 0.38 0.28 16 Element 13686 13686 13686 12459 12456 12459 RXB;4;C-B;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.96 0.36 0.48 0.30 0.40 0.30 16 Element 13693 13693 13693 12460 12463 12460 RXB;4;E-D;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.35 0.11 0.49 0.22 0.06 0.12 2 Element 15364 15364 15364 15364 15701 15701 RXB;4;B-A;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.35 0.11 0.49 0.22 0.06 0.12 2 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Element 15365 15365 15365 15365 15702 15702 RXB;4;E-D;145-163 D/C Ratio 1.07 0.76 0.64 0.21 0.08 0.08 16 Element 16180 16180 16180 16183 16180 16183 RXB;4;B-A;145-163 D/C Ratio 1.07 0.75 0.64 0.21 0.09 0.08 16 Element 16187 16187 16187 16184 16187 16184 RXB;4;E-D;163-181 D/C Ratio 0.23 0.11 0.34 0.11 0.05 0.04 10 Element 17547 17547 15228 17547 17709 17709 Draft Revision 3 RXB;4;B-A;163-181 D/C Ratio 0.27 0.11 0.32 0.11 0.05 0.04 10 Element 14900 17548 15229 17548 17710 17710 Note:

Highlighted items indicate those design check zones that exceed a D/C ratio of 0.8.

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-8a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Wall at Grid Line 4 Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static 13693 84 -37 18 8 3 3 0 0 3071 -78 -421 95 2 15 2 0 2 7307 -36 -169 -69 -18 2 2 5 -2 16180 -231 -40 -112 -11 -1 -1 -1 0 16187 -230 -40 111 -6 -1 0 1 0 15701 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dynamic 13693 694 251 414 529 53 69 30 18 3071 172 870 234 58 517 156 9 106 7307 262 101 82 760 182 44 69 75 16180 768 216 317 47 7 5 9 6 16187 763 215 316 54 8 6 10 7 3.B-53 15701 29 304 202 10 34 4 9 15 Hydrodynamic 13693 18 20 17 1 0 1 0 0 3071 3 38 3 0 0 0 0 0 7307 1 37 1 1 0 0 0 0 16180 58 7 18 4 0 0 0 0 16187 59 7 18 3 0 0 0 0 15701 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-8b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for RXB Wall at Grid Line 4 Element Sxx MAX Sxx MIN Syy MAX Syy MIN Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) 13693 796 -627 234 -308 448 539 56 73 30 18 3071 97 -252 487 -1,329 331 60 532 157 9 108 7307 227 -298 -30 -307 152 779 185 46 75 78 16180 596 -1,057 182 -263 447 61 9 6 10 6 16187 592 -1,051 182 -262 445 63 10 7 11 7 15701 29 -29 304 -304 202 10 34 4 9 15 3.B-54 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17, RAI 03.08.04-34 Table 3B-11: Summary of D/C Ratios for RXB Wall at Grid Line 6 Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Reinf. Stress Stress Checked RXB;6;D-C.5;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.23 0.09 0.47 0.35 0.22 0.28 12 Element 3745 4884 3164 3164 4884 4885 RXB;6;C.5-C;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.29 0.07 0.35 0.28 0.09 0.28 12 Element 4887 4887 4887 3167 4357 4889 RXB;6;C-B.5;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.29 0.07 0.33 0.28 0.10 0.29 12 Element 4892 4892 4891 3172 4362 4890 RXB;6;B.5-B;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.30 0.11 0.50 0.38 0.24 0.58 15 Element 2060 2060 2060 2060 4895 2060 RXB;6;D-C.5;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.38 0.17 0.33 0.26 0.38 0.42 15 Element 7463 8202 6577 6577 8202 8203 RXB;6;C-5-C;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.32 0.09 0.34 0.20 0.16 0.27 15 3.B-57 Element 7151 8205 7467 6026 6580 8205 RXB;6;C-B.5;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.36 0.11 0.34 0.21 0.07 0.26 15 Element 8209 8209 7470 6029 7470 8210 RXB;6;B.5-B;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.35 0.14 0.31 0.26 0.31 0.50 15 Element 7473 8212 6032 8213 6032 8213 RXB;6;D-C.5;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.33 0.13 0.28 0.19 0.28 0.21 12 Element 9362 9362 9362 9362 9955 11678 Design Reports and Critical Section Details RXB;6;C.5-C;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.40 0.08 0.39 0.15 0.04 0.11 12 Element 11681 9365 11682 9365 9958 11681 RXB;6;C-B.5;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.41 0.08 0.39 0.15 0.04 0.11 12 Element 11686 9963 11685 9370 9963 11686 RXB;6;B.5-B;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.33 0.13 0.28 0.19 0.28 0.21 12 Element 9373 9373 9373 9373 9966 11689 RXB;6;D-C.5;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.48 0.09 0.44 0.14 0.20 0.15 12 Draft Revision 3 Element 13878 13878 13468 13878 13878 13466 RXB;6;C.5-C;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.53 0.09 0.58 0.14 0.04 0.15 11 Element 13469 12986 13470 12986 13881 13469 RXB;6;C-B.5;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.53 0.09 0.58 0.14 0.04 0.15 11 Element 13471 12991 13471 12991 13886 13472

Table 3B-11: Summary of D/C Ratios for RXB Wall at Grid Line 6 (Continued)

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Reinf. Stress Stress Checked RXB;6;B.5-B;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.48 0.09 0.44 0.15 0.20 0.15 12 Element 13889 13889 13473 13889 13889 13475 RXB;6;E-D;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.61 0.20 0.64 0.22 0.12 0.12 2 Element 15845 15845 15845 15845 15845 15845 RXB;6;D-C;126-145 D/C Ratio 1.27 0.59 0.40 0.19 0.33 0.14 24 Element 15846 15846 15495 15137 15846 14842 RXB;6;C-B;126-145 D/C Ratio 1.27 0.59 0.39 0.19 0.33 0.13 24 Element 15857 15857 15506 15148 15857 14851 RXB;6;B-A;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.61 0.20 0.64 0.22 0.12 0.12 2 Element 15858 15858 15858 15858 15858 15858 RXB;6;E-D;145-163 D/C Ratio 1.46 0.61 0.60 0.18 0.17 0.06 16 Element 16295 16295 16295 16594 16295 17189 RXB;6;B-A;145-163 D/C Ratio 1.47 0.61 0.60 0.18 0.17 0.05 16 3.B-58 Element 16296 16296 16296 16595 16296 17196 RXB;6;E-D;163-181 D/C Ratio 0.28 0.12 0.35 0.16 0.20 0.11 10 Element 14903 14903 17385 14903 17713 17579 RXB;6;B-A;163-181 D/C Ratio 0.28 0.12 0.35 0.16 0.20 0.11 10 Element 14904 15201 17390 15201 17714 17580 Note:

Highlighted items indicate those design check zones that exceed a D/C ratio of 0.8.

Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-11a: Magnitudes of Bounding, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Wall at Grid Line 6 Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static 13889 -4 -144 -42 5 17 -13 -4 -14 2060 -48 -263 33 16 12 19 -6 49 8202 -89 -232 36 -92 137 37 -21 -61 13469 -14 -54 13 -5 -25 3 -1 -6 13470 -11 -43 2 -6 -27 -1 1 -7 6580 -55 -133 4 36 6 3 3 7 4890 -37 -169 -1 35 130 3 1 -34 15846 175 -12 -45 48 11 -16 5 -2 15495 -12 -39 27 25 5 -10 4 -3 15857 175 -11 44 47 8 15 -5 -3 14842 -3 -38 19 -3 -9 4 1 -4 3.B-59 16296 82 -1 45 -44 -11 4 -5 -1 15845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17713 -16 -15 -9 -9 7 -3 8 -5 15858 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dynamic 13889 212 174 357 271 62 80 49 28 2060 196 564 249 42 297 40 18 85 8202 331 162 185 137 173 77 84 23 Design Reports and Critical Section Details 13469 43 80 462 25 72 21 6 19 13470 26 69 491 15 84 6 2 11 6580 83 107 261 81 65 26 25 15 4890 39 146 259 33 90 9 2 21 15846 1,048 120 266 224 20 42 36 5 15495 457 230 275 196 36 53 22 5 15857 1,045 121 264 225 21 42 36 5 Draft Revision 3 14842 209 72 241 34 39 55 11 19 16296 912 186 335 108 18 6 14 6 15845 284 309 329 23 29 11 15 15 17713 45 47 65 25 9 3 23 5 15858 284 308 329 25 26 12 15 15

Table 3B-11a: Magnitudes of Bounding, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Wall at Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Grid Line 6 (Continued)

Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Hydrodynamic 13889 9 44 8 19 13 2 3 3 2060 14 87 8 1 10 3 1 11 8202 1 56 1 9 14 1 0 0 13469 1 17 3 3 6 1 0 2 13470 2 13 1 3 8 0 0 2 6580 1 39 0 2 5 1 2 0 4890 3 49 0 2 8 1 0 0 15846 54 7 13 13 3 6 1 0 15495 4 14 8 9 2 4 1 0 15857 53 7 13 13 3 5 1 1 14842 5 14 5 1 0 1 0 1 16296 24 3 12 12 3 1 1 0 15845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.B-60 17713 7 4 2 2 2 1 2 1 15858 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-11b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for RXB Wall at Grid Line 6 Element Sxx MAX Sxx MIN Syy MAX Syy MIN Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) 13889 218 -225 74 -361 407 295 91 95 55 44 2060 162 -259 388 -914 289 59 318 62 24 145 8202 243 -421 -13 -450 222 238 324 114 105 85 13469 30 -59 43 -151 478 32 103 25 7 27 13470 18 -39 39 -125 494 24 120 7 3 21 6580 28 -139 13 -278 265 120 75 30 31 22 4890 5 -78 26 -364 260 71 229 12 3 55 15846 1,277 -927 115 -140 324 284 33 64 42 8 15495 449 -473 205 -283 309 230 43 66 27 8 15857 1,273 -923 116 -139 321 285 31 63 42 9 14842 211 -216 48 -124 264 38 48 60 13 24 16296 1,018 -853 188 -190 392 164 32 12 20 7 3.B-61 15845 284 -284 309 -309 329 23 29 11 15 15 17713 36 -68 36 -66 76 37 17 7 33 12 15858 284 -284 308 -308 329 25 26 12 15 15 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17 Table 3B-14: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Wall at Grid Line E Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Reinf. Stress Stress Checked RXB;E;1-2;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.38 0.10 0.53 0.43 0.57 0.54 24 Element 2642 3257 2599 2599 3924 4526 RXB;E;2-3;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.33 0.11 0.59 0.51 0.26 0.60 28 Element 2666 4005 2659 2654 2666 4559 RXB;E;3-4;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.51 0.11 0.55 0.35 0.19 0.57 44 Element 2669 2680 2669 2680 3424 2684 RXB;E;4-5;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.21 0.09 0.26 0.34 0.21 0.61 48 Element 2822 2722 2802 2774 3570 2794 RXB;E;5-6;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.24 0.08 0.35 0.35 0.20 0.55 48 Element 2940 2952 2940 2940 3586 2840 RXB;E;6-7;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.23 0.09 0.30 0.35 0.34 0.48 20 3.B-65 Element 2962 2962 4372 4916 4916 2962 RXB;E;1-2;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.35 0.08 0.65 0.38 0.49 0.28 24 Element 5613 5597 7747 6738 5597 5630 RXB;E;2-3;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.36 0.10 0.49 0.33 0.30 0.42 28 Element 7787 5662 5670 5670 7785 7789 RXB;E;3-4;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.31 0.08 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.42 44 Element 5698 5730 6262 5718 7797 7807 Design Reports and Critical Section Details RXB;E;4-5;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.18 0.06 0.24 0.26 0.13 0.44 48 Element 5883 5810 7843 5889 6445 7843 RXB;E;5-6;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.19 0.06 0.30 0.29 0.13 0.43 48 Element 5913 5961 6559 6011 6463 7885 RXB;E;6-7;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.24 0.06 0.43 0.36 0.34 0.39 20 Element 7166 6062 7168 6062 6620 7899 RXB;E;1-2;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.37 0.04 0.78 0.36 0.41 0.26 24 Draft Revision 3 Element 11177 9495 9453 8861 8861 8902 RXB;E;2-3;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.35 0.09 0.41 0.21 0.30 0.41 28 Element 8926 8921 10438 8916 8921 8966 RXB;E;3-4;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.27 0.09 0.32 0.17 0.21 0.47 44 Element 11267 11267 10486 9072 11241 9072

Table 3B-14: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Wall at Grid Line E (Continued)

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Reinf. Stress Stress Checked RXB;E;4-5;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.28 0.09 0.33 0.17 0.16 0.46 48 Element 11269 11269 10576 9210 10560 9094 RXB;E;5-6;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.21 0.05 0.37 0.23 0.13 0.41 48 Element 10654 11301 10728 9350 10652 9234 RXB;E;6-7;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.23 0.04 0.48 0.32 0.28 0.33 20 Element 9386 9406 10748 9406 9406 9378 RXB;E;1-2;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.31 0.03 0.70 0.19 0.20 0.26 24 Element 12333 13584 12333 12333 12333 13584 RXB;E;2-3;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.30 0.06 0.40 0.15 0.24 0.39 26 Element 13596 13623 12375 12375 13173 12395 RXB;E;3-4;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.47 0.12 0.31 0.08 0.20 0.43 44 Element 13660 13660 12415 12819 12399 13269 RXB;E;4-5;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.36 0.08 0.25 0.09 0.13 0.34 48 3.B-66 Element 13283 13695 13771 12527 13777 13695 RXB;E;5-6;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.25 0.05 0.33 0.15 0.14 0.25 48 Element 13797 13791 12599 12599 13791 12539 RXB;E;6-7;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.19 0.01 0.46 0.18 0.18 0.16 20 Element 13025 13891 13025 12655 13488 13025 RXB;E;1-2;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.26 0.05 0.42 0.12 0.35 0.38 24 Element 15613 15613 14631 14631 15613 15608 Design Reports and Critical Section Details RXB;E;2-3;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.39 0.10 0.23 0.07 0.21 0.37 28 Element 15651 15651 14661 14661 14669 14685 RXB;E;3-4;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.47 0.13 0.27 0.06 0.26 0.69 44 Element 15348 15348 15697 15697 15697 15360 RXB;E;4-5;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.42 0.11 0.31 0.07 0.20 0.65 48 Element 15703 15366 15766 15766 15766 14791 RXB;E;5-6;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.44 0.09 0.38 0.11 0.22 0.65 48 Draft Revision 3 Element 15779 15779 15779 15841 15779 14795 RXB;E;6-7;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.13 0.03 0.35 0.13 0.13 0.20 20 Element 15859 15859 14859 14859 14859 14853

Table 3B-14: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Wall at Grid Line E (Continued)

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Reinf. Stress Stress Checked RXB;E;1-2;145-163 D/C Ratio 0.34 0.09 0.21 0.06 0.31 0.27 24 Element 16985 16985 16065 16065 16088 16387 RXB;E;2-3;145-163 D/C Ratio 0.60 0.16 0.25 0.04 0.21 0.46 28 Element 17021 17021 16124 16100 16124 16423 RXB;E;3-4;145-163 D/C Ratio 0.59 0.16 0.29 0.04 0.36 0.57 44 Element 17033 17049 16176 16176 16176 16475 RXB;E;4-5;145-163 D/C Ratio 0.54 0.15 0.32 0.04 0.32 0.56 48 Element 17105 17101 16232 16188 16188 16531 RXB;E;5-6;145-163 D/C Ratio 0.54 0.12 0.43 0.09 0.31 0.54 48 Element 16543 17153 16244 16288 16244 16543 RXB;E;6-7;145-163 D/C Ratio 0.29 0.04 0.36 0.10 0.18 0.19 20 Element 16898 17205 16300 16300 17197 16599 3.B-67 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-14a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Wall at Grid Line E Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static 2669 -64 -307 -8 18 -70 -30 5 -68 3924 -60 -227 8 -149 -5 -20 -55 2 2794 -49 -286 -12 -22 -138 6 0 -73 2666 -60 -304 6 -6 -83 26 1 -69 2659 -49 -284 5 -21 -162 6 1 -75 4559 -45 -239 -2 -12 -42 4 8 54 11177 -1 -84 -13 -30 -11 15 -6 4 9453 -14 -114 -5 -72 -13 10 -19 -5 5597 -52 -207 3 -160 -19 3 -51 3 9072 -38 -159 10 9 13 -2 1 -6 17021 -5 0 -10 -20 -17 4 0 -13 3.B-68 12333 5 -61 -10 -15 -12 9 -1 -4 16176 -13 -31 -18 -29 -82 -5 24 -3 15360 -14 -49 -3 -15 -26 1 12 28 Dynamic 2669 92 160 340 29 270 100 24 50 3924 110 368 114 171 38 49 65 19 2794 87 223 128 59 278 15 4 58 2666 103 221 353 17 396 110 67 50 Design Reports and Critical Section Details 2659 111 506 215 152 729 78 18 47 4559 107 340 163 27 108 18 7 94 11177 33 409 170 194 25 65 61 11 9453 42 483 160 192 35 29 58 28 5597 83 389 121 142 37 49 57 13 9072 54 93 143 12 67 80 5 100 17021 358 53 87 58 49 53 28 72 Draft Revision 3 12333 28 383 164 162 18 94 43 15 16176 263 65 86 107 407 31 39 48 15360 198 71 79 52 219 50 11 128

Table 3B-14a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Wall at Grid Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Line E (Continued)

Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Hydrodynamic 2669 12 78 8 2 3 0 1 3 3924 1 60 4 4 1 0 1 0 2794 11 75 2 2 11 0 0 3 2666 11 78 2 0 5 0 1 3 2659 9 72 6 2 10 0 0 3 4559 6 65 6 1 3 0 0 1 11177 4 18 2 7 1 1 3 1 9453 3 24 1 3 0 0 2 1 5597 1 49 3 3 1 0 0 0 9072 1 42 1 1 0 1 0 1 17021 5 2 1 7 2 0 1 3 12333 4 13 0 7 1 1 3 1 16176 3 3 2 8 15 0 4 1 3.B-69 15360 4 9 0 2 7 2 2 5 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-14b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for RXB Wall at Grid Line E Element Sxx MAX Sxx MIN Syy MAX Syy MIN Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) 2669 40 -168 -68 -546 357 49 344 130 29 121 3924 50 -171 201 -655 126 325 44 69 120 22 2794 49 -147 11 -583 142 83 428 21 5 134 2666 53 -174 -5 -604 361 24 484 137 69 122 2659 70 -169 294 -863 226 174 901 84 19 125 4559 68 -158 166 -643 171 40 153 22 15 149 11177 35 -38 343 -510 186 231 37 81 70 16 9453 31 -59 393 -621 167 268 48 40 79 35 5597 32 -136 231 -645 128 305 57 53 109 16 9072 18 -93 -24 -294 153 22 80 82 7 107 17021 358 -368 54 -55 97 85 68 58 30 89 12333 37 -27 335 -456 175 184 31 105 47 21 3.B-70 16176 253 -280 37 -98 107 144 504 36 67 51 15360 187 -215 32 -129 83 69 252 53 25 161 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17, RAI 03.08.04-34 Table 3B-15: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Slab at EL. 100-0 Demand/Capacity Ratios Section East-West Reinf. E-W Comp. North-South N-S Comp. Stress XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Stress Reinf. Checked RXB;100;1-2;D-E.a D/C Ratio 0.49 0.08 0.53 0.34 1.30 0.90 17 Element 11738 11758 11760 11782 11738 11704 RXB;100;2-3;D-E.a D/C Ratio 0.47 0.12 0.68 0.22 0.23 0.46 31 Element 11810 11818 11804 11804 11810 11857 RXB;100;3-4;D-E.a D/C Ratio 0.37 0.07 0.87 0.27 0.25 0.81 55 Element 11960 11966 11970 11970 11937 11966 RXB;100;4-5;D-E.a D/C Ratio 0.18 0.06 0.67 0.25 0.28 0.79 60 Element 11990 11976 11980 11980 11978 11976 RXB;100;5-6;D-E.a D/C Ratio 0.18 0.07 0.51 0.19 0.16 0.52 60 Element 12200 12210 12100 12100 12209 12210 RXB;100;6-7;D-E.a D/C Ratio 0.18 0.11 0.25 0.16 0.19 0.46 18 3.B-71 Element 12280 12220 12242 12220 12296 12220 RXB;100;1-2;C-D.a D/C Ratio 0.62 0.15 0.64 0.35 0.24 0.44 36 Element 11788 11788 11783 11783 11788 11690 RXB;100;6-7;C-D.a D/C Ratio 0.18 0.10 0.17 0.09 0.19 0.22 30 Element 12301 12221 12243 12221 12222 12224 RXB;100;1-2;B-C.a D/C Ratio 0.61 0.15 0.66 0.35 0.27 0.94 36 Element 11789 11789 11794 11794 11696 11697 Design Reports and Critical Section Details RXB;100;6-7;B-C.a D/C Ratio 0.17 0.10 0.17 0.09 0.19 0.23 30 Element 12254 12232 12254 12232 12231 12229 RXB;100;1-2;A-B.a D/C Ratio 0.40 0.12 0.44 0.30 1.06 0.42 21 Element 11755 11755 11717 11795 11755 11775 RXB;100;2-3;A-B.a D/C Ratio 0.36 0.06 0.52 0.18 0.20 0.45 35 Element 11805 11807 11805 11805 11864 11864 RXB;100;3-4;A-B.a D/C Ratio 0.35 0.07 0.87 0.27 0.25 0.82 55 Draft Revision 3 Element 11961 11975 11971 11971 11944 11975 RXB;100;4-5;A-B.a D/C Ratio 0.18 0.07 0.67 0.25 0.27 0.80 60 Element 11991 11985 11981 11981 11983 11985 RXB;100;5-6;A-B.a D/C Ratio 0.19 0.08 0.51 0.19 0.16 0.53 60 Element 12201 12211 12101 12101 12212 12211

Table 3B-15: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Slab at EL. 100-0 (Continued)

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Demand/Capacity Ratios Section East-West Reinf. E-W Comp. North-South N-S Comp. Stress XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Stress Reinf. Checked RXB;100;6-7;A-B.a D/C Ratio 0.18 0.11 0.26 0.17 0.19 0.47 18 Element 12295 12233 12233 12233 12311 12233 Note:

Highlighted items indicate those design check zones that exceed a D/C ratio of 0.8.

3.B-72 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-15a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Slab at EL. 100'-0" Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static 11788 -1 -11 2 -31 -7 -2 11 0 11971 6 -23 22 -1 -1 1 1 -1 11738 4 -41 20 -3 -2 2 -4 -3 11697 -1 -5 8 -10 -3 -1 -6 2 Dynamic 11788 147 67 143 39 14 11 13 11 11971 33 251 106 34 228 7 11 60 11738 83 56 105 50 113 62 150 12 11697 32 224 42 50 41 13 24 90 Hydrodynamic 11788 3 15 1 9 2 0 3 0 11971 1 3 1 1 2 0 0 1 11738 7 9 5 0 1 0 1 1 3.B-73 11697 1 9 4 0 1 0 1 0 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-15b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for RXB Slab at EL. 100'-0" Element Sxx MAX Sxx MIN Syy MAX Syy MIN Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) 11788 149 -151 71 -93 147 79 24 13 26 11 11971 40 -29 231 -276 129 35 232 9 12 62 11738 93 -85 24 -107 130 53 116 64 155 16 11697 32 -34 228 -238 55 61 45 15 31 92 3.B-74 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17 Table 3B-18: Summary of D/C Ratios for RXB Roof Slab Demand/Capacity Ratios Section East-West Reinf. E-W Comp. North-South N-S Comp. Stress XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Stress Reinf. Checked RXB;181;1-2;D.3-E D/C Ratio 0.26 0.12 0.26 0.04 0.11 0.24 24 Element 17275 17275 17967 17275 17583 17967 RXB;181;2-3;D.3-E D/C Ratio 0.42 0.21 0.34 0.07 0.18 0.42 28 Element 17295 17295 17981 17295 17755 17981 RXB;181;3-4;D.3-E D/C Ratio 0.37 0.21 0.34 0.08 0.29 0.51 44 Element 17305 17309 17983 17303 17777 18003 RXB;181;4-5;D.3-E D/C Ratio 0.39 0.20 0.41 0.07 0.26 0.49 48 Element 17653 17339 18027 17331 17779 18005 RXB;181;5-6;D.3-E D/C Ratio 0.38 0.16 0.42 0.08 0.23 0.48 48 Element 17677 17367 18049 17677 17803 18029 RXB;181;6-7;D.3-E D/C Ratio 0.19 0.07 0.27 0.07 0.22 0.29 20 3.B-78 Element 18053 18053 18053 17679 17391 17391 RXB;181;1-2;C-D.3 D/C Ratio 0.63 0.08 0.49 0.04 0.36 0.27 42 Element 18083 18147 18147 18083 18083 18147 RXB;181;2-3;C-D.3 D/C Ratio 0.43 0.12 0.54 0.05 0.09 0.44 49 Element 18161 18245 18245 18245 18167 18245 RXB;181;3-4;C-D.3 D/C Ratio 0.36 0.13 0.54 0.05 0.07 0.48 77 Element 18259 18399 18259 18259 18399 18399 Design Reports and Critical Section Details RXB;181;4-5;C-D.3 D/C Ratio 0.37 0.13 0.61 0.05 0.08 0.48 84 Element 18567 18413 18567 18413 18567 18567 RXB;181;5-6;C-D.3 D/C Ratio 0.43 0.10 0.59 0.06 0.10 0.48 84 Element 18735 18581 18735 18735 18735 18581 RXB;181;6-7;C-D.3 D/C Ratio 0.50 0.07 0.49 0.06 0.34 0.29 35 Element 18811 18749 18749 18749 18811 18749 RXB;181;1-2;A.7-C D/C Ratio 0.63 0.08 0.49 0.04 0.36 0.27 42 Draft Revision 3 Element 18084 18160 18160 18084 18084 18160 RXB;181;2-3;A.7-C D/C Ratio 0.43 0.12 0.54 0.05 0.09 0.45 49 Element 18174 18258 18258 18258 18168 18258 RXB;181;3-4;A.7-C D/C Ratio 0.36 0.13 0.54 0.05 0.07 0.47 77 Element 18272 18412 18272 18272 18412 18412

Table 3B-18: Summary of D/C Ratios for RXB Roof Slab (Continued)

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Demand/Capacity Ratios Section East-West Reinf. E-W Comp. North-South N-S Comp. Stress XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Stress Reinf. Checked RXB;181;4-5;A.7-C D/C Ratio 0.37 0.13 0.60 0.04 0.07 0.48 84 Element 18580 18426 18580 18426 18580 18580 RXB;181;5-6;A.7-C D/C Ratio 0.43 0.11 0.59 0.06 0.10 0.47 84 Element 18748 18594 18748 18748 18748 18594 RXB;181;6-7;A.7-C D/C Ratio 0.50 0.08 0.49 0.06 0.34 0.29 35 Element 18812 18762 18762 18762 18812 18762 RXB;181;1-2;A-A.7 D/C Ratio 0.28 0.13 0.28 0.05 0.10 0.24 24 Element 17276 17276 17968 17276 17584 17968 RXB;181;2-3;A-A.7 D/C Ratio 0.42 0.20 0.34 0.08 0.18 0.42 28 Element 17296 17296 17982 17296 17756 17982 RXB;181;3-4;A-A.7 D/C Ratio 0.38 0.21 0.35 0.08 0.29 0.51 44 Element 17306 17312 17984 17304 17778 18004 RXB;181;4-5;A-A.7 D/C Ratio 0.39 0.20 0.41 0.06 0.26 0.49 48 3.B-79 Element 17654 17340 18028 17332 17780 18006 RXB;181;5-6;A-A.7 D/C Ratio 0.38 0.16 0.42 0.08 0.23 0.48 48 Element 17678 17368 18050 17678 17804 18030 RXB;181;6-7;A-A.7 D/C Ratio 0.18 0.07 0.27 0.07 0.22 0.30 20 Element 18054 18054 18054 17680 17392 17392 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-18a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Roof Slab Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static 18084 3 5 6 -265 -40 -8 -27 -5 18567 -9 2 2 -71 -372 9 1 -30 18083 3 5 -8 -265 -40 8 -27 5 18003 1 40 1 -6 -143 10 -7 30 Dynamic 18084 41 59 284 214 60 24 24 24 18567 137 48 141 83 453 40 10 40 18083 41 65 277 214 45 25 24 21 18003 201 69 49 12 174 21 12 38 Hydrodynamic 18084 0 2 1 74 11 2 7 1 18567 4 6 1 19 101 3 0 8 18083 0 1 2 74 11 2 8 1 18003 1 18 2 2 41 3 2 8 3.B-80 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-18b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for RXB Roof Element Sxx MAX Sxx MIN Syy MAX Syy MIN Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) 18084 44 -39 65 -56 291 553 112 34 59 30 18567 132 -151 55 -52 144 174 925 52 11 78 18083 44 -39 72 -61 286 553 96 35 59 28 18003 202 -201 127 -47 52 20 358 34 20 76 3.B-81 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17 Table 3B-19: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Pilasters on Grid Line A Wall Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Moment Axis 2 Shear Axis 3 Compression Tension # Elems Checked RXB;PI;A2;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.66 0.70 0.20 0.13 4 Element 879 2030 1320 2030 RXB;PI;A2;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.38 0.31 0.18 0.15 4 Element 3060 2348 2348 2348 RXB;PI;A2;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.62 0.28 0.14 0.13 4 Element 5147 3803 3803 5147 RXB;PI;A2;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.60 0.42 0.08 0.16 4 Element 5342 5431 5342 5342 RXB;PI;A2;126-163 D/C Ratio 0.61 0.45 0.06 0.11 8 Element 6106 6258 5668 5872 RXB;PI;A3;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.66 0.63 0.19 0.08 4 Element 897 2036 897 2036 3.B-82 RXB;PI;A3;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.44 0.31 0.17 0.09 4 Element 3440 2378 2378 2641 RXB;PI;A3;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.73 0.40 0.10 0.04 4 Element 5151 3833 3833 3833 RXB;PI;A3;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.45 0.71 0.05 0.02 4 Element 5344 5433 5433 5628 RXB;PI;A3;126-163 D/C Ratio 0.68 0.53 0.05 0.03 8 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Element 5874 6260 5874 5874 RXB;PI;A4;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.42 0.47 0.17 0.00 4 Element 935 935 935 2039 RXB;PI;A4;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.39 0.26 0.13 0.02 4 Element 2679 3442 2418 3442 RXB;PI;A4;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.58 0.49 0.09 0.02 4 Element 4719 3911 3911 5159 Draft Revision 3 RXB;PI;A4;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.63 0.58 0.05 0.03 4 Element 5366 5630 5366 5630 RXB;PI;A4;126-163 D/C Ratio 0.71 0.63 0.06 0.05 8 Element 6110 5876 5876 5876

Table 3B-19: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Pilasters on Grid Line A Wall (Continued)

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Moment Axis 2 Shear Axis 3 Compression Tension # Elems Checked RXB;PI;A5;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.44 0.44 0.17 0.01 4 Element 1009 1009 1009 2085 RXB;PI;A5;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.63 0.31 0.14 0.05 4 Element 2733 3458 2476 3458 RXB;PI;A5;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.65 0.42 0.09 0.03 4 Element 5169 3993 3993 5169 RXB;PI;A5;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.53 0.36 0.06 0.05 4 Element 5368 5441 5632 5632 RXB;PI;A5;126-163 D/C Ratio 0.72 0.68 0.07 0.07 8 Element 6112 5782 5878 5878 RXB;PI;A6;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.36 0.44 0.18 0.07 4 Element 1500 1087 1087 2144 RXB;PI;A6;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.51 0.31 0.17 0.14 4 Element 2797 3478 2544 3478 3.B-83 RXB;PI;A6;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.52 0.27 0.14 0.17 4 Element 4883 4077 4077 4883 RXB;PI;A6;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.51 0.18 0.11 0.26 4 Element 5385 5385 5385 5385 RXB;PI;A6;126-163 D/C Ratio 0.55 0.33 0.10 0.26 8 Element 5880 5784 5880 5880 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-19a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Pilasters on Grid Line A Wall Load Element P V2 V3 T M2 M3 (k) (k) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) (k-ft)

Static 2733 -1,031 6 110 17 4,441 88 3458 -873 12 274 7 2,495 209 2544 -1,059 29 272 5 1,674 442 4883 -615 16 9 25 384 107 5169 -563 1 38 7 1,464 131 935 -1,470 2 626 9 6,047 40 1087 -1,355 14 520 48 2,520 74 2144 -1,115 44 377 15 3,187 491 5151 -500 2 52 2 2,769 112 2030 -1,094 47 283 95 3,284 501 1320 -1,179 19 224 145 3,681 145 5385 -543 29 73 6 388 123 5342 -467 51 20 19 373 335 5431 -428 38 17 42 199 137 5880 -283 24 129 75 4,659 306 5366 -521 15 70 10 3,328 183 5630 -446 9 7 48 3,250 57 5668 -331 16 105 84 522 211 5872 -305 23 174 53 4,670 345 5344 -474 28 27 10 3,135 216 5433 -489 21 53 32 3,457 100 5628 -300 7 108 5 1,234 105 6112 -159 13 105 26 14,043 172 5782 -427 32 341 9 2,978 368 5878 -335 16 506 24 12,476 358 Tier 2 3B-84 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details Table 3B-19a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Pilasters on Grid Line A Wall (Continued)

Load Element P V2 V3 T M2 M3 (k) (k) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) (k-ft)

Dynamic 2733 783 107 256 57 7,240 890 3458 888 87 406 69 8,276 779 2544 1,306 115 369 76 4,406 987 4883 1,304 110 87 91 9,256 1,644 5169 566 117 290 117 21,376 1,044 935 773 160 403 124 8,509 1,959 1087 1,121 241 409 81 8,464 2,569 2144 1,240 151 369 78 3,235 1,026 5151 560 127 266 94 33,127 1,276 2030 1,715 290 1,107 496 9,661 1,678 1320 1,619 367 576 155 27,784 4,367 5385 1,687 97 284 217 8,914 1,734 5342 1,301 100 739 356 20,935 2,452 5431 1,216 89 885 470 13,601 1,909 5880 1,759 161 448 318 13,879 2,168 5366 511 137 621 90 28,577 909 5630 544 244 1,298 315 11,127 2,703 5668 991 115 542 525 15,787 1,272 5872 1,004 142 482 108 25,518 2,736 5344 542 105 1,140 160 35,645 1,104 5433 560 113 1,418 275 24,225 1,095 5628 463 144 1,239 100 14,935 1,491 6112 977 217 645 165 45,609 2,817 5782 871 326 1,940 201 19,587 2,147 5878 1,240 192 1,548 287 42,602 4,450 Tier 2 3B-85 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details Table 3B-19a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Pilasters on Grid Line A Wall (Continued)

Load Element P V2 V3 T M2 M3 (k) (k) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) (k-ft)

Hydrodynamic 2733 287 2 4 3 79 13 3458 248 3 7 2 47 29 2544 300 7 1 1 30 52 4883 170 3 1 3 56 52 5169 158 2 1 1 95 33 935 409 0 23 1 207 2 1087 390 7 24 2 335 74 2144 318 3 1 1 103 55 5151 152 4 2 3 162 40 2030 303 5 1 3 111 73 1320 338 6 11 5 46 83 5385 147 1 15 9 303 66 5342 118 2 2 5 159 61 5431 111 0 2 3 185 42 5880 87 1 29 11 1,171 4 5366 147 1 16 5 330 20 5630 118 5 4 4 437 29 5668 86 2 24 14 133 27 5872 79 1 41 5 989 7 5344 146 2 27 5 308 25 5433 147 2 34 5 677 11 5628 82 2 21 2 414 61 6112 18 1 26 1 3,226 22 5782 100 3 60 5 906 85 5878 73 7 108 2 2,896 48 Tier 2 3B-86 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-19b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for RXB Pilasters on Grid Line A Wall Element P MAX P MIN V2 V3 T M2 M3 (k) (k) (k) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) (k-ft) 2733 39 -2,101 115 370 77 11,760 990 3458 263 -2,009 102 687 78 10,818 1,016 2544 547 -2,665 151 642 82 6,110 1,481 4883 860 -2,089 129 96 119 9,695 1,804 5169 162 -1,288 120 329 125 22,935 1,208 935 -288 -2,653 162 1,052 134 14,763 2,001 1087 156 -2,865 262 953 131 11,319 2,717 2144 442 -2,673 198 747 94 6,525 1,573 5151 212 -1,211 133 320 99 36,059 1,427 2030 923 -3,112 342 1,392 595 13,055 2,253 1320 777 -3,135 392 811 305 31,510 4,595 5385 1,291 -2,377 128 371 232 9,605 1,922 5342 952 -1,886 152 760 381 21,467 2,848 5431 899 -1,755 128 903 515 13,985 2,088 5880 1,563 -2,128 185 606 404 19,709 2,478 5366 137 -1,180 153 706 105 32,235 1,113 5630 216 -1,108 259 1,309 366 14,814 2,789 5668 747 -1,408 133 671 623 16,442 1,510 5872 779 -1,388 166 697 165 31,177 3,089 5344 213 -1,162 135 1,194 175 39,088 1,345 5433 217 -1,196 136 1,505 313 28,359 1,206 5628 246 -845 153 1,368 107 16,583 1,657 6112 836 -1,154 231 775 191 62,879 3,011 5782 543 -1,398 361 2,341 215 23,470 2,600 5878 978 -1,648 215 2,162 313 57,974 4,856 Tier 2 3B-87 Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17 Table 3B-20: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Beams on EL. 75'-0" Slab Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Moment Axis 3 Shear Axis 2 Compression Tension # Elems Checked RXB;TB;75;A-B;2-2 D/C Ratio 0.36 0.23 0.21 0.14 5 Element 3658 3657 3654 3654 RXB;TB;75;A-B;2-3 D/C Ratio 0.20 0.10 0.06 0.06 5 Element 3664 3668 3668 3668 RXB;TB;75;A-B;3-3 D/C Ratio 0.33 0.30 0.08 0.12 5 Element 3678 3674 3678 3678 RXB;TB;75;A-B;3-4 D/C Ratio 0.39 0.51 0.05 0.06 5 Element 3684 3684 3688 3688 RXB;TB;75;A-B;4-4 D/C Ratio 0.35 0.58 0.14 0.13 5 Element 3694 3694 3694 3698 RXB;TB;75;A-B;4-5(1) D/C Ratio 0.45 0.48 0.11 0.07 5 Element 3704 3704 3704 3708 3.B-88 RXB;TB;75;A-B;4-5(2) D/C Ratio 0.48 0.52 0.09 0.08 5 Element 3714 3714 3714 3718 RXB;TB;75;A-B;5-5 D/C Ratio 0.46 0.51 0.11 0.16 5 Element 3724 3724 3728 3728 RXB;TB;75;A-B;5-6(1) D/C Ratio 0.39 0.44 0.09 0.08 5 Element 3734 3734 3734 3736 RXB;TB;75;A-B;5-6(2) D/C Ratio 0.40 0.48 0.08 0.06 5 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Element 3744 3744 3744 3748 RXB;TB;75;A-B;6-6 D/C Ratio 0.38 0.58 0.18 0.21 5 Element 3754 3754 3754 3754 RXB;TB;75;6-7;B-C D/C Ratio 0.38 0.22 0.07 0.06 5 Element 3773 3773 3767 3767 RXB;TB;75;6-7;C-C D/C Ratio 0.50 0.26 0.06 0.04 5 Element 3772 3772 3772 3760 Draft Revision 3 RXB;TB;75;6-7;C-D D/C Ratio 0.41 0.22 0.07 0.05 5 Element 3771 3771 3765 3765 RXB;TB;75;D-E;2-2 D/C Ratio 0.26 0.14 0.20 0.11 5 Element 3653 3653 3653 3653

Table 3B-20: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Beams on EL. 75'-0" Slab (Continued)

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Moment Axis 3 Shear Axis 2 Compression Tension # Elems Checked RXB;TB;75;D-E;2-3 D/C Ratio 0.29 0.18 0.16 0.16 5 Element 3663 3659 3660 3659 RXB;TB;75;D-E;3-3 D/C Ratio 0.70 0.55 0.10 0.18 5 Element 3673 3673 3669 3669 RXB;TB;75;D-E;3-4 D/C Ratio 0.41 0.54 0.06 0.07 5 Element 3683 3683 3679 3679 RXB;TB;75;D-E;4-4 D/C Ratio 0.37 0.59 0.14 0.13 5 Element 3693 3693 3693 3689 RXB;TB;75;D-E;4-5(1) D/C Ratio 0.46 0.48 0.11 0.07 5 Element 3703 3703 3703 3699 RXB;TB;75;D-E;4-5(2) D/C Ratio 0.48 0.53 0.09 0.10 5 Element 3713 3713 3713 3711 RXB;TB;75;D-E;5-5 D/C Ratio 0.46 0.51 0.11 0.16 5 Element 3723 3723 3719 3719 3.B-89 RXB;TB;75;D-E;5-6(1) D/C Ratio 0.38 0.44 0.08 0.08 5 Element 3733 3733 3733 3731 RXB;TB;75;D-E;5-6(2) D/C Ratio 0.40 0.48 0.08 0.06 5 Element 3743 3743 3743 3739 RXB;TB;75;D-E;6-6 D/C Ratio 0.28 0.59 0.18 0.21 5 Element 3753 3753 3753 3753 RXB;TB;75;1-2;B-C D/C Ratio 0.16 0.10 0.04 0.05 6 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Element 3633 3633 3648 3648 RXB;TB;75;1-2;C-C D/C Ratio 0.22 0.18 0.09 0.15 6 Element 3647 3647 3647 3647 RXB;TB;75;1-2;C-D D/C Ratio 0.19 0.09 0.03 0.05 6 Element 3646 3646 3643 3646 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-20a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Beams on EL. 75'-0" Slab Load Element P V2 V3 T M2 M3 (k) (k) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) (k-ft)

Static 3673 -56 95 2 1 10 833 3754 -162 58 24 6 225 309 3654 -249 9 12 0 49 98 3693 -163 84 11 0 67 525 3753 -161 59 24 6 229 315 Dynamic 3673 69 158 34 13 140 1,951 3754 401 194 56 10 444 1,218 3654 389 29 35 12 240 748 3693 283 186 122 8 1,216 1,573 3753 400 195 57 9 444 1,222 Hydrodynamic 3673 2 24 0 0 2 175 3754 9 13 1 1 11 78 3654 22 2 1 0 5 21 3693 9 11 1 0 8 49 3753 9 14 1 1 11 80 Tier 2 3B-90 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-20b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for RXB Beams on EL. 75'-0" Slab Element P MAX P MIN V2 V3 T M2 M3 (k) (k) (k) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) (k-ft) 3673 15 -126 278 36 14 152 2,959 3754 248 -572 266 81 16 680 1,605 3654 162 -660 40 48 13 294 867 3693 129 -454 280 134 8 1,291 2,146 3753 247 -570 267 82 16 684 1,616 Tier 2 3B-91 Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17 Table 3B-21: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Buttress at Grid Line 1 on EL. 126'-0" Slab Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Moment Axis 2 Shear Axis 3 Compression Tension # Elems Checked RXB;B;1;126;B-A D/C Ratio 0.35 0.17 0.08 0.30 5 Element 5657 5658 5657 5657 RXB;B;1;126;C-B D/C Ratio 0.43 0.24 0.16 0.58 6 Element 5656 5655 5652 5652 RXB;B;1;126;D-C D/C Ratio 0.43 0.18 0.10 0.36 6 Element 5645 5646 5650 5650 RXB;B;1;126;E-D D/C Ratio 0.38 0.25 0.01 0.06 5 Element 5644 5644 5640 5640 3.B-92 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-21a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Buttress at Grid Line 1 on EL. 126'-0" Slab Load Element P V2 V3 T M2 M3 (k) (k) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) (k-ft)

Static 5645 84 31 29 7 196 477 5644 96 6 37 3 397 274 5652 167 98 16 21 789 870 Dynamic 5645 311 927 204 210 7,455 11,965 5644 99 762 355 92 6,529 6,550 5652 2,683 1,464 209 132 4,213 15,281 Hydrodynamic 5645 40 7 9 5 229 82 5644 39 1 16 7 65 38 5652 80 29 4 2 94 294 Tier 2 3B-93 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-21b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for RXB Buttress at Grid Line 1 on EL. 126'-0" Slab Element P MAX P MIN V2 V3 T M2 M3 (k) (k) (k) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) (k-ft) 5645 435 -267 966 243 221 7,880 12,524 5644 235 -42 769 409 102 6,991 6,862 5652 2,929 -2,596 1,591 228 155 5,097 16,445 Tier 2 3B-94 Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17 Table 3B-22: Summary of D/C Ratios for West Wing Wall at Grid Line 4 Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Reinf. Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Stress Stress Checked RXB;4;D-C;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.40 0.19 0.68 0.76 0.24 0.83 16 Element 4638 4638 3071 3071 4638 3071 RXB;4;C-B;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.38 0.17 0.67 0.74 0.25 0.82 16 Element 4645 4645 3072 3072 4645 3072 RXB;4;D-C;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.38 0.22 0.62 0.42 0.46 0.39 20 Element 8070 8070 8073 5781 7300 7300 RXB;4;C-B;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.40 0.22 0.62 0.42 0.50 0.42 20 Element 8077 8077 8074 5782 7307 7307 RXB;4;D-C;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.32 0.18 0.61 0.40 0.39 0.41 16 Element 11582 9082 9678 9678 11582 11585 RXB;4;C-B;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.33 0.18 0.61 0.41 0.41 0.44 16 3.B-95 Element 11589 9089 9679 9679 11589 11586 RXB;4;D-C;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.95 0.35 0.48 0.29 0.38 0.28 16 Element 13686 13686 13686 12459 12456 12459 RXB;4;C-B;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.96 0.36 0.48 0.30 0.40 0.30 16 Element 13693 13693 13693 12460 12463 12460 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-22a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB West Wing Wall at Grid Line 4 Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static 13693 84 -37 18 8 3 3 0 0 3071 -78 -421 95 2 15 2 0 2 7307 -36 -169 -69 -18 2 2 5 -2 Dynamic 13693 694 251 414 529 53 69 30 18 3071 172 870 234 58 517 156 9 106 7307 262 101 82 760 182 44 69 75 Hydrodynamic 13693 18 20 17 1 0 1 0 0 3071 3 38 3 0 0 0 0 0 7307 1 37 1 1 0 0 0 0 3.B-96 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-22b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for RXB West Wing Wall at Grid Line 4 Element Sxx MAX Sxx MIN Syy MAX Syy MIN Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) 13693 796 -627 234 -308 448 539 56 73 30 18 3071 97 -252 487 -1,329 331 60 532 157 9 108 7307 227 -298 -30 -307 152 779 185 46 75 78 3.B-97 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17, RAI 03.08.04-34 Table 3B-23: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Pool Wall at Grid Line B Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Reinf. Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear Elems Checked Stress Stress RXB;B;1-2;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.35 0.18 0.43 0.40 0.18 0.28 20 Element 3971 3971 2613 2634 4528 4528 RXB;B;2-3;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.40 0.12 0.65 0.34 0.28 0.54 28 Element 3016 4545 3016 3016 4545 4578 RXB;B;3-4;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.57 0.07 0.55 0.22 0.97 0.58 44 Element 4596 3046 4046 3057 4584 4596 RXB;B;4-5;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.32 0.06 0.41 0.19 0.28 0.46 48 Element 4116 3077 3077 4650 4650 4650 RXB;B;5-6;24-50 D/C Ratio 0.37 0.12 0.63 0.37 0.33 0.35 48 Element 3161 4878 3163 3163 4878 4878 RXB;B;1-2;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.34 0.16 0.50 0.31 0.47 0.20 21 3.B-98 Element 6774 6770 6130 5621 6774 6130 RXB;B;2-3;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.41 0.12 0.52 0.25 0.40 0.54 35 Element 5651 8010 5651 5651 8010 5651 RXB;B;3-4;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.60 0.10 0.39 0.28 0.59 0.42 55 Element 7294 8068 5770 5701 5701 8068 RXB;B;4-5;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.54 0.10 0.43 0.21 0.45 0.96 60 Element 7314 7314 5892 8080 7314 8084 Design Reports and Critical Section Details RXB;B;5-6;50-75 D/C Ratio 0.46 0.13 0.67 0.32 0.42 0.65 60 Element 7457 6014 6014 6014 6014 6014 RXB;B;1-2;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.41 0.11 0.37 0.23 0.34 0.32 20 Element 11377 10434 10788 8894 11377 11377 RXB;B;2-3;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.54 0.09 0.55 0.20 0.39 0.38 28 Element 11536 8919 11536 8919 11536 8919 RXB;B;3-4;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.46 0.08 0.35 0.22 0.55 0.44 44 Draft Revision 3 Element 9075 9075 9075 9075 9075 9075 RXB;B;4-5;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.35 0.06 0.35 0.23 0.43 0.41 48 Element 10858 9121 9214 9214 11591 9096 RXB;B;5-6;75-100 D/C Ratio 0.44 0.13 0.59 0.26 0.39 0.54 48 Element 9947 9354 9354 9354 9354 9354

Table 3B-23: Summary of D/C Ratios for Reactor Building Pool Wall at Grid Line B (Continued)

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Reinf. Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear Elems Checked Stress Stress RXB;B;1-2;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.43 0.10 0.45 0.23 0.27 0.49 20 Element 13171 13171 13554 13554 12337 13554 RXB;B;2-3;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.32 0.09 0.58 0.28 0.27 0.36 28 Element 12371 13176 12371 12371 12371 12371 RXB;B;3-4;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.49 0.06 0.52 0.19 0.77 0.54 44 Element 13683 12450 13683 12450 13683 12450 RXB;B;4-5;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.40 0.05 0.37 0.20 0.63 0.51 48 Element 13715 13747 13779 12517 13697 12469 RXB;B;5-6;100-126 D/C Ratio 0.57 0.09 0.39 0.20 0.45 0.35 48 Element 13875 13875 13463 12541 13793 12541 RXB;B;1-2;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.72 0.12 0.39 0.21 0.42 0.22 24 Element 15601 15601 14634 14634 15601 15601 RXB;B;2-3;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.24 0.07 0.36 0.12 0.15 0.38 28 3.B-99 Element 15633 15641 15649 14997 14997 14997 RXB;B;3-4;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.32 0.05 0.53 0.23 0.58 1.00 44 Element 15699 15683 14739 14739 14739 14739 RXB;B;4-5;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.46 0.13 0.58 0.27 0.50 0.93 54 Element 15401 12682 15713 14761 15738 14746 RXB;B;5-6;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.63 0.12 0.47 0.21 0.90 0.76 51 Element 12688 12688 15786 15094 15440 14797 Design Reports and Critical Section Details RXB;B;6-7;126-145 D/C Ratio 0.49 0.10 0.43 0.14 0.42 0.68 19 Element 14855 14855 14855 15510 15861 15861 Note:

Highlighted items indicate those design check zones that exceed a D/C ratio of 0.8.

Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-23a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static, Dynamic, and Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for RXB Pool Wall at Grid Line B Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static 15601 39 -42 -19 45 35 -23 -1 -5 6014 -99 -168 -28 -102 31 3 -32 26 4584 -38 -153 -62 -96 21 -4 -66 -47 14739 5 -92 -6 25 38 -2 6 -12 Dynamic 15601 208 141 132 285 34 54 66 36 6014 103 290 197 115 283 28 53 89 4584 50 102 159 233 115 18 130 65 14739 45 227 108 190 320 65 105 153 Hydrodynamic 15601 11 12 3 13 10 6 1 1 6014 1 41 1 0 1 1 0 0 4584 6 49 6 0 4 1 0 1 3.B-100 14739 3 38 6 5 5 0 2 9 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-23b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for RXB Pool Wall at Grid Line B Element Sxx MAX Sxx MIN Syy MAX Syy MIN Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) 15601 257 -179 110 -194 154 343 79 83 68 42 6014 4 -202 162 -498 225 217 315 32 85 116 4584 19 -94 -2 -304 227 329 141 24 197 113 14739 54 -43 173 -356 120 221 363 68 114 174 3.B-101 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17 Table 3B-29: Summary of D/C Ratios for Control Building Wall at Grid Line 3 Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Reinf. Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Checked Stress Stress CRB;3;B-A;50-76 D/C Ratio 0.39 0.06 0.37 0.17 0.38 0.43 15 Element 714 927 716 714 1487 1488 CRB;3;B-A;76-100 D/C Ratio 0.43 0.07 0.46 0.10 0.30 0.43 15 Element 2178 2178 2029 2029 2030 2482 CRB;3;B-A;100-120 D/C Ratio 0.34 0.06 0.43 0.11 0.22 0.70 11 Element 3131 3275 2994 3276 3276 3276 CRB;3;B-A;120-141 D/C Ratio 0.27 0.06 0.38 0.07 0.34 0.94 6 Element 3712 3712 3712 3777 3712 3712 CRB;3;C-B;50-76 D/C Ratio 0.60 0.09 0.41 0.17 0.26 0.36 29 Element 709 709 711 710 1479 1479 CRB;3;C-B;76-100 D/C Ratio 0.49 0.07 0.55 0.20 0.13 0.49 28 3.B-108 Element 2028 2176 2028 2026 2175 2026 CRB;3;C-B;100-120 D/C Ratio 0.38 0.06 0.51 0.13 0.16 0.61 22 Element 2993 3127 2993 2993 3268 2993 CRB;3;D-C;50-76 D/C Ratio 0.52 0.07 0.42 0.14 0.28 0.33 7 Element 708 916 708 708 1476 1476 CRB;3;D-C;76-100 D/C Ratio 0.42 0.08 0.35 0.10 0.20 0.33 7 Element 2169 2169 2024 2024 2471 2024 Design Reports and Critical Section Details CRB;3;D-C;100-120 D/C Ratio 0.21 0.03 0.21 0.06 0.28 0.25 5 Element 3121 3121 2987 2987 3264 2987 CRB;3;E-D;50-76 D/C Ratio 0.52 0.09 0.47 0.16 0.22 0.34 18 Element 706 706 705 705 1471 1472 CRB;3;E-D;76-100 D/C Ratio 0.33 0.06 0.37 0.08 0.15 0.31 20 Element 2022 2167 2022 2021 2318 2023 CRB;3;E-D;100-120 D/C Ratio 0.13 0.04 0.13 0.05 0.15 0.18 14 Draft Revision 3 Element 3120 3120 2986 3259 3263 3263

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-29a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static and Dynamic Forces and Moments for CRB Wall at Grid Line 3

Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static 709 -8 -49 9 1 1 -1 0 -1 1487 -20 -24 -9 0 -1 -1 5 2 2028 -16 -55 -24 -1 -7 -1 0 -1 3712 1 0 -4 -4 -16 2 -2 -5 Dynamic 709 52 48 90 3 1 1 1 1 1487 16 29 46 3 8 1 5 4 2028 10 47 91 3 17 3 1 5 3712 39 47 36 5 18 4 5 12 Tier 2 3B-109 Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-29b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for CRB Wall at Grid Line 3 Element Sxx MAX Sxx MIN Syy MAX Syy MIN Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) 709 44 -60 -1 -98 99 3 3 2 2 2 1487 -4 -36 5 -53 55 4 9 1 10 7 2028 -6 -26 -8 -102 115 4 24 4 1 7 3712 40 -38 47 -48 39 9 34 5 6 17 3.B-110 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17, RAI 03.08.04-34S1 Table 3B-30: Summary of D/C Ratios for Control Building Wall at Grid Line 4 Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Reinf. Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Checked Stress Stress CRB;4;B-A;50-76 D/C Ratio 0.63 0.11 0.78 0.21 0.55 1.16 24 Element 790 793 789 789 793 788 CRB;4;B-A;76-100 D/C Ratio 0.28 0.06 0.22 0.13 0.42 0.34 24 Element 2233 2082 2382 2082 2082 2077 CRB;4;B-A;100-120 D/C Ratio 0.20 0.05 0.28 0.10 0.34 0.32 17 Element 3328 3327 3043 3043 3185 3043 CRB;4;B-A;120-140 D/C Ratio 0.18 0.05 0.18 0.07 0.20 0.15 8 Element 3937 3937 3750 3750 3937 3749 CRB;4;C-B;50-76 D/C Ratio 0.48 0.09 0.77 0.24 0.40 1.38 32 Element 781 781 786 786 999 786 CRB;4;C-B;76-100 D/C Ratio 0.22 0.03 0.29 0.08 0.16 0.35 32 3.B-111 Element 2524 2076 2221 2221 2372 2528 CRB;4;C-B;100-120 D/C Ratio 0.18 0.04 0.13 0.03 0.17 0.20 23 Element 3324 3324 3032 3032 3173 3038 CRB;4;D-C;50-76 D/C Ratio 0.33 0.06 0.43 0.15 0.36 0.65 8 Element 779 778 778 778 778 779 CRB;4;D-C;76-100 D/C Ratio 0.20 0.03 0.17 0.09 0.25 0.19 8 Element 2218 2068 2067 2067 2218 2523 Design Reports and Critical Section Details CRB;4;D-C;100-120 D/C Ratio 0.12 0.02 0.14 0.04 0.18 0.34 5 Element 3172 3172 3031 3031 3315 3031 CRB;4;E-D;50-76 D/C Ratio 0.58 0.09 0.53 0.22 0.49 0.59 28 Element 777 777 775 775 1341 774 CRB;4;E-D;76-100 D/C Ratio 0.30 0.06 0.24 0.12 0.46 0.27 28 Element 2211 2060 2367 2060 2060 2064 CRB;4;E-D;100-120 D/C Ratio 0.25 0.05 0.23 0.09 0.43 0.28 20 Draft Revision 3 Element 3310 3309 3025 3025 3165 3030 CRB;4;E-D;120-140 D/C Ratio 0.26 0.06 0.18 0.06 0.25 0.14 8 Element 3740 3928 3740 3739 3928 3740 Note: Highlighted items indicate those design check zones that exceed a D/C ratio of 0.8.

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-30a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static and Dynamic Forces and Moments for CRB Wall at Grid Line 4 Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static 790 -19 -64 -14 20 -15 11 1 -27 789 -17 -62 -12 18 -15 -11 1 -27 793 -18 -68 -20 -32 -4 -3 15 -4 786 -13 -51 -5 11 -5 2 2 -16 3740 1 -7 -5 -2 2 0 -2 1 3043 5 -13 26 -42 -9 4 7 -2 3165 5 -8 -25 -5 1 3 -7 1 3031 -1 -8 -2 -3 -7 2 2 -1 Dyanmic 790 78 103 137 21 54 8 30 28 789 52 156 125 53 97 7 26 50 793 96 101 61 17 32 7 24 36 786 68 190 112 19 71 6 9 67 3.B-112 3740 56 42 59 11 7 4 4 4 3043 16 91 26 25 6 4 4 5 3165 21 28 18 10 5 3 7 1 3031 11 33 56 6 8 3 2 10 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-30b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for CRB Wall at Grid Line 4 Element Sxx MAX Sxx MIN Syy MAX Syy MIN Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) 790 59 -97 39 -167 151 41 68 19 30 55 789 35 -70 93 -218 137 71 112 18 27 77 793 78 -114 33 -169 80 49 36 9 39 41 786 55 -81 138 -241 117 30 76 8 11 84 3740 57 -54 35 -49 64 14 8 4 6 4 3043 20 -11 78 -103 52 68 15 8 11 8 3165 26 -16 19 -36 43 15 6 6 14 2 3031 10 -12 25 -40 58 9 15 4 4 11 3.B-113 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17 Table 3B-33: Summary of D/C Ratios for Control Building Wall at Grid Line A Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Horizontal Reinf. Horiz. Comp. Vertical Reinf. Vert. Comp. XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Checked Stress Stress CRB;A;1-2;50-63 D/C Ratio 0.90 0.11 0.89 0.22 0.67 0.95 16 Element 643 635 639 647 635 639 CRB;A;2-2.8;50-63 D/C Ratio 0.52 0.09 0.39 0.16 0.46 0.43 6 Element 692 692 692 903 698 692 CRB;A;2.8-4;50-63 D/C Ratio 0.54 0.09 0.47 0.21 0.54 0.84 12 Element 770 770 770 770 982 770 CRB;A;1-2;63-76 D/C Ratio 0.56 0.07 0.56 0.16 0.54 0.62 16 Element 1220 1200 1212 1200 1200 1416 CRB;A;2-2.8;63-76 D/C Ratio 0.43 0.06 0.32 0.15 0.50 0.25 6 Element 1258 1241 1251 1258 1461 1444 CRB;A;2.8-4;63-76 D/C Ratio 0.34 0.05 0.24 0.15 0.76 0.12 12 3.B-117 Element 1469 1340 1296 1266 1469 1521 CRB;A;1-2;76-100 D/C Ratio 0.41 0.05 0.39 0.13 0.40 0.51 32 Element 2122 1990 1990 1978 2273 1987 CRB;A;2-2.8;76-100 D/C Ratio 0.37 0.04 0.21 0.11 0.48 0.29 12 Element 2306 2002 2005 2002 2011 2002 CRB;A;2.8-4;76-100 D/C Ratio 0.28 0.05 0.20 0.13 0.71 0.16 24 Element 2049 2018 2514 2059 2018 2502 Design Reports and Critical Section Details CRB;A;1-2;100-120 D/C Ratio 0.23 0.02 0.16 0.05 0.18 0.19 24 Element 3230 2955 2937 2937 3233 3230 CRB;A;2-2.8;100-120 D/C Ratio 0.33 0.04 0.31 0.06 0.36 0.15 9 Element 3251 3251 3251 3251 2975 2961 CRB;A;2.8-4;100-120 D/C Ratio 0.20 0.04 0.25 0.08 0.78 0.41 18 Element 2982 3283 3024 3024 2982 3014 CRB;A;2.8-4;120-140 D/C Ratio 0.26 0.06 0.23 0.08 0.46 0.28 24 Draft Revision 3 Element 3906 3711 3711 3711 3906 3711

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-33a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static and Dynamic Forces and Moments for CRB Wall at Grid Line A Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static 643 -1 -86 91 -19 21 11 -2 31 639 -13 -60 89 -14 15 27 -2 25 1469 -20 -73 21 81 5 -7 45 -3 3251 7 -6 9 -9 -11 -6 2 1 2982 2 -15 -12 -36 -14 -13 16 2 3014 3 -16 4 50 -18 5 -1 8 Dynamic 643 111 125 98 12 35 8 19 25 639 70 151 86 32 69 11 7 41 1469 30 54 64 34 6 7 17 2 3251 47 55 72 16 7 6 5 2 2982 28 37 34 25 6 8 9 2 3014 13 46 28 32 15 4 1 5 3.B-118 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-33b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for CRB Wall at Grid Line A Element Sxx MAX Sxx MIN Syy MAX Syy MIN Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) 643 111 -112 39 -211 188 31 56 19 20 55 639 58 -83 91 -211 175 47 84 39 9 65 1469 10 -50 -19 -127 85 114 11 14 62 5 3251 54 -39 48 -61 81 24 17 13 7 2 2982 30 -27 22 -52 47 61 20 22 25 5 3014 16 -9 30 -63 32 82 33 9 2 13 3.B-119 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-37a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static and Dynamic Forces and Moments for Perimeter of CRB Basemat Slab Load FX(Sxx) FY(Syy) Sxy Vxz Vyz MX(Myy) MY(Mxx) k/ft k/ft k/ft k/ft k/ft k-ft/ft k-ft/ft Static Maximum 271 93 64 86 82 304 230 Elm. No. 7 300 391 20 300 92 387 Dynamic Maximum 353 292 211 103 99 355 525 Elm. No. 390 369 1 1 376 391 23 Tier 2 3B-123 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-37b: Magnitudes of Bounding DemandFinal Design Forces and Moments for Perimeter of Main Control Building Basemat Slab FX(Sxx) FY(Syy) Sxy Vxz Vyz MX(Myy) MY(Mxx) k/ft k/ft k/ft k/ft k/ft k-ft/ft k-ft/ft Maximum 312 291 216 143 125 406 593 Elm. No. 386 375 373 373 345 69 386 Note:

The shear forces and bending moments are obtained by the absolute sum of the static and seismic results Tier 2 3B-124 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-38a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static and Dynamic Forces and Moments for Interior of CRB Basemat Slab Load FX(Sxx) FY(Syy) Sxy Vxz Vyz MX(Myy) MY(Mxx) k/ft k/ft k/ft k/ft k/ft k-ft/ft k-ft/ft Static Maximum 123 48 40 49 41 192 191 Elm. No. 30 251 60 61 129 129 60 Dynamic Maximum 145 98 71 26 32 135 142 Elm. No. 32 350 352 44 287 45 45 Tier 2 3B-125 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-38b: Magnitudes of Bounding DemandFinal Design Forces and Moments for Interior of Main Control Building Basemat Slab FX(Sxx) FY(Syy) Sxy Vxz Vyz MX(Myy) MY(Mxx) k/ft k/ft k/ft k/ft k/ft k-ft/ft k-ft/ft Maximum 309 228 135 114 83 302 326 Elm. No. 45 347 25 45 45 99 45 Note:

The shear forces and bending moments are obtained by the absolute sum of the static and seismic results.

Tier 2 3B-126 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-39a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static and Dynamic Forces and Moments for Basemat of CRB Tunnel Load FX(Sxx)? FY(Syy)? Sxy Vxz Vyz MX(Myy) MY(Mxx) k/ft k/ft k/ft k/ft k/ft k-ft/ft k-ft/ft Static Maximum - - 78 105 103 339 398 Elm. No. - - 400 516 485 488 486 Dynamic Maximum - - 206 248 140 357 357 Elm. No. - - 547 550 548 397 397 Forces are not calculated since the west end of the tunnel is separated from the RXB by a nominal 6 inch gap.

Tier 2 3B-127 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-39b: Magnitudes of Bounding DemandFinal Design Forces and Moments for Control Building Basemat of Control Building Tunnel FX(Sxx) FY(Syy) Sxy Vxz Vyz MX(Myy) MY(Mxx) k/ft k/ft k/ft k/ft k/ft k-ft/ft k-ft/ft Maximum - - 230 196 212 732 793 Elm. No. - - 547 516 485 488 486 Forces are not calculated since the west end of the tunnel is separated from the RXB by a nominal 6 inch gap Tier 2 3B-128 Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17, RAI 03.08.04-34S1 Table 3B-43: Summary of D/C Ratios for Control Building Slab at EL. 100'-0" Demand/Capacity Ratios Section East-West Reinf. E-W Comp. Stress North-South N-S Comp. Stress XZ-Plane Shear YZ-Plane Shear # Elems Reinf. Checked CRB;100;7-1;D-E D/C Ratio 0.82 0.19 0.84 0.14 0.51 1.13 10 Element 2543 2539 2538 2538 2539 2538 CRB;100;1-2;D-E D/C Ratio 0.96 0.17 0.38 0.03 0.80 0.50 55 Element 2562 2562 2561 2718 2562 2649 CRB;100;2-3;D-E D/C Ratio 0.33 0.05 0.27 0.06 0.51 0.38 22 Element 2742 2764 2764 2764 2764 2747 CRB;100;3-4;D-E D/C Ratio 0.17 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.53 0.30 25 Element 2895 2824 2893 2827 2897 2827 CRB;100;7-1;C-D D/C Ratio 0.84 0.21 0.62 0.10 0.56 0.95 10 Element 2540 2557 2541 2541 2540 2541 CRB;100;1-2;C-D D/C Ratio 1.00 0.16 0.30 0.03 1.01 0.48 16 3.B-132 Element 2565 2565 2610 2564 2565 2679 CRB;100;2-3;C-D D/C Ratio 0.20 0.03 0.30 0.03 0.37 0.39 8 Element 2749 2749 2748 2748 2789 2809 CRB;100;3-4;C-D D/C Ratio 0.15 0.04 0.12 0.02 0.52 0.44 10 Element 2829 2899 2899 2899 2898 2899 CRB;100;1-2;B-C D/C Ratio 1.09 0.13 0.53 0.04 0.84 0.32 64 Element 2566 2566 2566 2567 2573 2566 Design Reports and Critical Section Details CRB;100;2-3;B-C D/C Ratio 0.25 0.03 0.19 0.03 0.66 0.35 32 Element 2812 2750 2817 2816 2817 2816 CRB;100;3-4;B-C D/C Ratio 0.26 0.06 0.15 0.03 0.50 0.44 40 Element 2837 2907 2900 2834 2835 2900 CRB;100;1-2;A-B D/C Ratio 0.47 0.03 0.38 0.03 0.83 0.47 48 Element 2574 2574 2671 2740 2574 2694 CRB;100;2-3;A-B D/C Ratio 0.40 0.03 0.35 0.06 0.60 0.48 20 Draft Revision 3 Element 2822 2822 2763 2802 2822 2763 CRB;100;3-4;A-B D/C Ratio 0.28 0.06 0.18 0.03 0.58 0.35 14 Element 2838 2908 2891 2890 2839 2838 Note: Highlighted items indicate those design check zones that exceed a D/C ratio of 0.8.

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-43a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static and Dynamic Forces and Moments for CRB Slab at EL. 100'-0" Load Element Sxx Syy Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft)

Static 2540 -1 -10 2 -4 -27 3 0 1 2538 -2 -11 -8 -6 -50 -8 1 -5 2540 -1 -10 2 -4 -27 3 0 1 2566 -8 -2 7 -29 -11 -8 -7 2 2565 -8 -2 11 -15 -6 -6 -5 1 2649 1 -6 4 -12 -50 -1 0 -9 2838 -6 -3 6 -23 -5 -3 -5 1 2891 -3 5 -14 2 -1 -1 1 1 2900 -10 -1 12 -11 -2 -1 4 0 Dynamic 2540 216 75 74 36 118 29 27 25 2538 114 127 104 42 84 58 10 70 2540 216 75 74 36 118 29 27 25 3.B-133 2566 121 33 72 36 18 14 9 10 2565 155 27 32 26 15 12 8 9 2649 17 22 21 6 32 5 3 10 2838 25 13 17 18 4 6 4 8 2891 20 19 16 8 5 3 4 6 2900 21 16 23 11 3 4 3 10 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-43b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for CRB Slab at EL. 100'-0" Element Sxx MAX Sxx MIN Syy MAX Syy MIN Sxy Mxx Myy Mxy Vxz Vyz (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (k/ft) 2540 216 -217 65 -85 76 40 145 33 28 26 2538 113 -116 117 -138 112 48 134 65 12 75 2540 216 -217 65 -85 76 40 145 33 28 26 2566 113 -128 32 -35 78 64 29 22 16 11 2565 147 -163 25 -29 43 41 21 18 14 10 2649 18 -17 16 -27 25 18 82 6 3 19 2838 19 -31 10 -16 22 41 9 9 9 9 2891 17 -23 24 -13 30 10 6 4 5 7 2900 12 -31 15 -16 35 23 5 5 7 11 3.B-134 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17 Table 3B-49: Summary of D/C Ratios for Control Building Pilasters on Grid Line 1 Wall Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Moment Axis 3 Shear Axis 2 Compression Tension # Elems Checked CRB;PI;1C;50-63 D/C Ratio 0.50 0.33 0.06 0.06 3 Element 245 2 245 646 CRB;PI;1B;50-76 D/C Ratio 0.62 0.95 0.06 0.04 5 Element 647 667 246 667 CRB;PI;1C;63-76 D/C Ratio 0.15 0.12 0.02 0.07 2 Element 666 666 656 666 CRB;PI;1C;76-100 D/C Ratio 0.41 0.24 0.02 0.09 4 Element 696 706 706 696 CRB;PI;1B;76-100 D/C Ratio 0.52 0.84 0.03 0.04 4 Element 697 677 677 677 CRB;PI;1C;100-120 D/C Ratio 0.51 0.32 0.03 0.08 3 Element 821 801 801 801 3.B-140 CRB;PI;1B;100-120 D/C Ratio 0.67 0.39 0.02 0.02 3 Element 822 812 822 802 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-49a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static and Dynamic Forces and Moments for CRB Pilasters on Grid Line 1 Load Element P V2 V3 T M2 M3 (k) (k) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) (k-ft)

Static 821 -25 43 11 18 122 861 2 -91 102 31 7 198 691 245 -210 42 28 33 191 984 696 27 14 12 28 153 424 822 -54 79 15 13 124 2,239 667 -81 285 8 37 68 1,777 246 -214 240 9 41 58 1,239 Dynamic 821 62 24 24 21 143 774 2 103 58 122 48 839 475 245 253 62 153 19 971 618 696 143 35 33 22 270 902 822 89 64 21 16 130 1,904 667 189 152 49 38 331 1,219 246 205 133 79 68 542 1,082 Tier 2 3B-141 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-49b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for CRB Pilasters on Grid Line 1 Element P MAX P MIN V2 V3 T M2 M3 (k) (k) (k) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) (k-ft) 821 37 -87 67 35 40 265 1,636 2 12 -194 160 153 55 1,037 1,167 245 44 -463 104 181 52 1,162 1,602 696 170 -117 48 45 51 423 1,326 822 36 -143 143 36 28 254 4,143 667 108 -270 437 57 76 399 2,996 246 -10 -419 373 87 110 599 2,321 Tier 2 3B-142 Draft Revision 3

Tier 2 NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report RAI 03.08.04-15, RAI 03.08.04-16, RAI 03.08.04-17 Table 3B-50: Summary of D/C Ratios for Control Building T-Beams on EL. 120'-0" Slab Demand/Capacity Ratios Section Moment Axis 3 Shear Axis 2 Compression Tension # Elems Checked CRB;TB;120;D-E;1-2(1) D/C Ratio 0.32 0.17 0.00 0.02 7 Element 850 854 852 853 CRB;TB;120;D-E;1-2(2) D/C Ratio 0.27 0.16 0.00 0.01 7 Element 879 879 874 874 CRB;TB;120;1-3;C-C D/C Ratio 0.45 0.19 0.00 0.01 12 Element 830 830 886 904 CRB;TB;120;1-3;B-C(2) D/C Ratio 0.59 0.21 0.00 0.01 12 Element 868 837 843 831 CRB;TB;120;1-3;B-C(1) D/C Ratio 0.77 0.25 0.00 0.01 12 Element 869 838 844 832 CRB;TB;120;1-3;B-B D/C Ratio 0.75 0.45 0.01 0.01 12 Element 833 833 833 833 3.B-143 CRB;TB;120;1-3;A-B(2) D/C Ratio 0.58 0.21 0.01 0.05 12 Element 871 914 914 914 CRB;TB;120;1-3;A-B(1) D/C Ratio 0.30 0.25 0.02 0.11 11 Element 872 909 909 909 Design Reports and Critical Section Details Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-50a: Magnitudes of Bounding Static and Dynamic Forces and Moments for CRB T-Beams on EL. 120'-0" Slab Load Element P V2 V3 T M2 M3 (k) (k) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) (k-ft)

Static 869 -8 1 1 2 15 1,056 838 -6 56 5 3 25 192 909 19 64 14 36 51 464 833 -6 92 8 6 39 1,638 Dynamic 869 15 16 9 5 85 1,184 838 18 45 16 14 58 258 909 154 29 11 35 42 341 833 37 85 18 20 91 1,658 Tier 2 3B-144 Draft Revision 3

NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report Design Reports and Critical Section Details RAI 03.08.04-11 Table 3B-50b: Magnitudes of Bounding Final Design Forces and Moments for CRB T-Beams on EL. 120'-0" Slab Element P MAX P MIN V2 V3 T M2 M3 (k) (k) (k) (k) (k-ft) (k-ft) (k-ft) 869 7 -23 17 10 7 100 2,240 838 12 -24 100 21 17 83 450 909 173 -135 92 25 71 93 805 833 31 -44 177 26 26 131 3,296 Tier 2 3B-145 Draft Revision 3