ML18137A470

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
301 Exam Administrative Items (ADAMS-2D)
ML18137A470
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 05/17/2018
From:
NRC/RGN-II
To:
Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
References
Download: ML18137A470 (18)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility. Surry Power Station Date of Examination: 10/30/2017

Initials Item Task Description a b c 1 a Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. I W Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with
                                                                                                                         -        02 b.

R Section D I of ES-40 1 or ES-40 1 N and whether all K)A categories are appropriately sampled

c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

d Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. P

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of .

normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major l 

                                                                                                                                         .A S            transients.

M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule ,2 çz L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D 5, Specific Instructions for the Simulator Operating Test, of ES-301 (including p

overlap). 3 a. Verify tnat the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2 (1) The outline)s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form. 47 A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is v,ithin the limits specified on the form f C (3) No tasks ate duplicated from the applicants audit test(s) I K (4) The nimber of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minznums specified on the form T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form R

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1.

u (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form. G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified. - H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of 1 applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days f2_

4 a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are coveted in the appropriate exam sections.

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 5545 sampling is appropriate. * (? -.
c. Ensure that KJA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
  • R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams ). fl C e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. (Z A9
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). i-
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer ()
c. NRCs Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supervisor Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
 # The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c: the chief examiners concurrence is requited.

0 Sample Plan generated by Chief Examiner, Michael Donithan.

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of Ic/3o Iii as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1MsL.L M,. I/-b-/& *1r

2. I Ccvis.oJ f)c.4k i&4(AA 11/16.114 %LL -
3. 1eMZdc,tL,-.. s-. -r -- 1,f,/zr 4-_--#ttfQ 4.JIt) lift L.f2.i( c-j/ 1/.i7 5.

L., .-{k%.-

6. r(4 I 7t 7t - ,
7. éj_,s5zczzz___
8. /
9. i< sfsrq. V7f? 2)cwA. ft/g,4h,7
10. 41V1 IlL,)7
11. /i7 (

1 2.OAni fLAJfrZ S. 1s* S-b /7 Te/ af/c/17 13.,4..a pJrim. 5/w/i4- c 1 4.r3- c41rk tI/,ir

15. /oi? 7puA- /1,57 iiJi/i7 7 NOTES: I, zcc- .tIiti7 cE/,&L.L_._

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. L) S - wq
2. i2J1..b /1 /17 L42
3. ... Cco I4oI Op4-.)
4. M Lcc( Efl4UC.c.t 27 /1 I
5. kI1 lLsrI iperUIOt
6. est ,-1Th SWtCr t 4.i%_ z3fi7
7. A/aw4 m2 6i-4 sLI 9.&4hA. Itrw- - ifrrli-r
10. IIh3- HtL rop MML ii. Rc Ed tZa/,
12. Ih ?OLhc £1 ç4y %
13. M.cW C3rsW4i Ia-tO -t47>--- 11117 fr. 0p3 1oj-fl 4* j2.-

NOTES:

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRCs chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administratio n,

except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRCs chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination m To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any Cr, information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered N) during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did CD not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

-o Q) CD PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 0 1 -h C) 2. CJ.-J /L.7 Rfcc/h t-1 II /-/f,

3. (-c SI(V
4. ,cr
5. twy 1lsr- J.71
                                                                                                                                                  ,i)   1)D)__

6. 7. 8. 9. Jo. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. NOTES: ES-201, Page 31 of 32

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-30f 4 FaciIity Suny Date of Exam: 10-30-2017 Scenario Numbers: 1 /2/3/4 Operating Test No.:SR3O1-17 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* ci 1 The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, [ but it does not cue the operators into expected events. 9.? 1) The scenarios consist mostly of related events. 2. (f 4)

3. Each event description consists of the following:
  • the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
  • the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
  • the expected operator actions (by shift position) 1y1
  • the event termination point (if applicable)
4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. 1 j f
5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

j_ ,)

6. if time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given. -3.. , IC -

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. n J2J_
6. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional 11\

fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. fl

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

jp_ i)

10. All individual operator compete ncies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). p
11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) l4
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). I?
13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible. ?79
14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew oosition.
                                                                                                                      .,1 (7      J Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d)                    Actual Attributes
1. Malfunctions after EOPentry (12) 21211/2
2. Abnormal events (24) 3/4/ 5/5 ) Q.P 4)
3. Major transients (12) 21 2/1/1 T1 *Z
4. EOP5 entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 2/2/ 2/ 1 1 1P ii
5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (I per scenario 1! 1/ 1/ 1 set)
6. Preidentified critical tasks ( 2) 4/5/4/4 1.1 (?J The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
# An independent NRC reviewer initials items in Column flc; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Surry Power Station Date of Exam: 10/30/2017 Operating Test No.: SR2017-301 A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E O I L N CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T N I T POSITION I C A S A B S A B S A B S A B M A T L R T O R T O R T O R T O U N Y O C P O C P O C P O C P M(*) T P E R I U RO RX 4 1 1 1 1,1 1 1 0 1,1 SRO-I NOR 1 1 1 I/C 1,2 2,5 2,4,6 3,4 2,2 4 4 2 SRO-U 3,2 MAJ 6,7 6,7 7,8 6 2,2 2 2 1 2,1 TS 0 2 2 RX 1 1 0 RO NOR 1,4 1 1 1 2,1 1 1 1 1,1 SRO-I I/C 3,5, 3,4,8 3,5 2,5 3,3 4 4 2 8 2,2 SRO-U MAJ 6,7 6,7 7,8 6 2,2 2 2 1 2,1 TS 0 2 2 RO RX 4 1 1 1 1,1 1 1 0 1,1 SRO-I NOR 1 0 0 0 1,0, 1 1 1 0,0 SRO-U I/C 2,3,5 2,3,4 2,3,4 2,3,4 3,4 4 4 2 

                                      ,5                ,5,6             ,5                 5,4 MAJ     6,7               6,7               7,8              6                  2,2   2   2  1 2,1 TS      1,2               3,5               2,5              2,4                2,2   0   2  2 2,2 RO          RX      4                 1                 1                1                  1,1   1   1  0 1,1 SRO-I       NOR     1                 0                 0                0                  1,0,  1   1  1 0,0 SRO-U       I/C     2,3,5             2,3,4             2,3,4            2,3,4              3,4   4   4  2
                                      ,5                ,5,6             ,5                 5,4 MAJ     6,7               6,7               7,8              6                  2,2   2   2  1 2,1 TS      1,2               3,5               2,5              2,4                2,2   0   2  2 2,2

Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Surry Date of Examination: 10/30/2017 Operating Test No.:SR301-17 APPLICANTS RO RO RO SRO-I SRO-I SRO-I SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose Events 1,2, 3,5, 2-8 2-8 2-6 1,2, 3,5, 2-8 2-8 2-6 1,2, 3,5, 2-8 2-8 2-6 and Conditions 6,7 6,7 6,7 Comply with and ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL Use Procedures (1) Operate Control ALL ALL ALL ALL Boards (2) Communicate ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL and Interact Demonstrate ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL Supervisory Ability (3) Comply with and 1,2 3,5 2,5 1,2 3,5 2,5 Use TS (3) Notes: (1) Includes TS compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors.)

ES403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Surry Power Station Date of Exam: 11/08/2017 Exam Level: RO SRO I Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
2. Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not requited pj (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted)
3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) p
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in i1 detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 7?J
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader Michael Meyer/Z_
b. Facility Reviewer(*) Rich Philpot/ _P4-.j&--
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) tt1ia
d. NRC Supervisor (*)
                                                                                     ]b

(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18137A470&oldid=2405635"