ML18102B525

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Monthly Operating Rept for Jul 1997 for Salem Generating Station,Unit 2.W/970815 Ltr
ML18102B525
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 07/31/1997
From: Garchow D, Phillips R, Tisdel D
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
LR-N970518, NUDOCS 9708250118
Download: ML18102B525 (10)


Text

' .

, Public ::>ervice Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit AUG lJi 1997 LR-N970518 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attn: Document Control Desk MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEM UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-311 In compliance with Section 6.9.1.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original monthly operating report for July, 1997, is attached.

I F. Gare ow General Manager -

Salem Operations RAR:tcp Enclosures c Mr. H. J. Miller Regional Administrator USNRC, Region 1 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19046


- ---~- -- - --- --- .~~_£!_*-.... -*~- ...-:..__ n r:::_ ___ ---- ----- ---...,

9708250118 970731 PDR ADOCK 05000311 R PDR I1111111111111111111111111111111 11111111 .

  • lil.lil.5C17*

The power is in your hands.

I 95-2168 REV. 6/94 I

_J

SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING

SUMMARY

- UNIT 2 JULY 1997 SALEM UNIT 2 The unit remained shutdown for the entire period. According to commitments from PSE&G and a subsequent confirmatory action letter from the NRC, the unit will remain shutdown pending completion of the following actions:

  • Appropriately address long standing equipment reliability and operability issues.
  • After the work is completed, conduct a restart readiness review to determine for ourselves the ability of the unit to operate in a safe, event free manner.
  • After the restart review, meet with the NRC and communicate the results of that review.

Refueling Information Docket No. 50-311

,Month:, July, 1997 Unit Name: Salem 2

Contact:

D. Tisdel Telephone: 609-339-1538 Month: July, 1997

1. Refueling information has changed from last month: Yes: No: X
2. Scheduled date for next refueling: Currently in outage.

Scheduled date for restart following refueling: To Be Determined

3. a. Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?

Yes: x No: Not Determined to Date:

b. Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?

Yes: X (for upcoming cycle) No: If no, when is it scheduled?

4. Scheduled date (s) for submitting proposed licensing action: N/A -

previously submitted

5. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling:
6. Number of Fuel Assemblies:
a. Incore: 193
b. In Spent Fuel Storage: 584
7. Present Licensed spent fuel storage capacity: 1632 Future spent fuel storage capacity: 1632
8. Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity: October, 2016

UNIT SHUTDOYN AND POYER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH July 1997 DOCKET NO.: ~5~0~-~31~1~--

UNIT NAME: Salem #2 DATE: 08-10-97 COMPLETED BY: Robert Phillips TELEPHONE: 609-339-2735 -

METHOD OF SHUTTING LICENSE -

DURATION DOIJN EVENT SYSTEM COMPONENT CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION ..

NO. DATE TYPE' (HOURS) REASON 2 REACTOR REPORT # CODE 4 CODE 6 TO PREVENT RECURRENCE 4092 7-1-97 F 744 Fc 4 2422 Refueling Outage Extension

-ca 1 2 3 4 5 F: Forced Reason Method: Axhibit G - Instructions Exhibit 1 - Same S: Scheduled A-Equipment Failure (explain) 1-Manual for Preparation of Data Source B"Maintenance or Test* 2-Manual Scram Entry Sheets for Licensee C-Refueling 3-Automatic Scram Event Report CLER) File D-Requlatory Restriction 4-Continuation of (NUREG-0161) .

E-Operator Training & License Examination Previous Outage F-Administrative 5-Load Reduction G-Operational Error (Explain) 9-0ther H-Other (Explain)

DOCKET NO.:

UNIT:

50-311 Salem 2 DATE: 08/15/97 COMPLETED BY: R. Ritzman TELEPHONE: (609) 339-1445

SUMMARY

OF CHANGES, TESTS, AND EXPERIMENTS FOR THE HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION MONTH JULY 1997 The following items completed during July 1997 have been evaluated to determine:

1. If the probability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to safety previously evaluated in the safety analysis report may be increased; or
2. If a possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than any evaluated previously in the safety analysis report may be created; or
3. If the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any technical specification is reduced.

The 10CFR50.59 Safety Evaluations showed that these items did not create a new safety hazard to the plant nor did they affect the safe shutdown of the reactor. These items did not change the plant effluent releases and did not alter the existing environmental impact. The 10CFR50.59 Safety Evaluations determined that no unreviewed safety or environmental questions are involved.

Design Changes Summary of Safety Evaluations 2EC-3341, Pkg. 1, Turbine Gland Sealing Steam and Leak Off System Modifications. This design change modifies the Turbine Gland Sealing Steam and Leak-Off system. The modifications include a new control valve, a new gland seal steam header pressure controller, a strainer with a drain valves and blowdown line, new internals for the high pressure turbine cylinder warming header steam pressure control valves, new turbine gland local steam pressure gauges and root valves, new orifice couplings, and the relocation of free blow valve piping connections.

This design change does not negatively impact any accident response. This design change does not increase the probability or consequences of either an accident or a malfunction of equipment important to safety. Therefore, this design change does not involve an Unreviewed Safety Question.

2EC-3370, Pkg. 1, Replacement of the Main Steam Coil Drain Tank Dump Valves. This design change replaces the Main Steam Coil Drain Tank Dump Valves to improve leak tightness.

This design change also installs "y" strainers before the dump valves and a manual isolation valve upstream of the strainer.

This design change does not negatively impact any accident response. This design change does not increase the probability or consequences of either an accident or a malfunction of equipment important to safety. Therefore, this design change does not involve an Unreviewed Safety Question.

2EC-3465, Pkg. 1, Circulating Water System Controls Modification. This design change modifies the Circulating Water system controls. This modification includes a revision to the circulator start logic, replacing the condenser waterbox vacuum switch, lowering the undervoltage time delay relay trip setpoint on the Circulating Water Pump Switchgear bus, and delaying the opening of the vacuum priming valves.

This design change does not negatively impact any accident response. This design change does not increase the probability or consequences of either an accident or a malfunction of equipment important to safety. Therefore, this design change does not involve an Unreviewed Safety Question.

2EE-0046, Pkg. 1, Circulating Water Traveling Screen Modification. This design change modifies the 21A Circulating Water Traveling Screen. The modification includes replacing the fish baskets, adding spray nozzles, providing a shield over the top of the spray nozzles, and replacing the drive motor, gear reducer, and coupling.

This design change does not negatively impact any accident response. This design change does not increase the probability or consequences of either an accident or a malfunction of equipment important to safety. Therefore, this design change does not involve an Unreviewed Safety Question.

2EE-0048, Pkg. 1, Circulating Water Traveling Screen Modification. This design change modifies the 22A Circulating Water Traveling Screen. The modification includes replacing the fish baskets, adding spray nozzles, providing a shield over the top of the spray nozzles, and replacing the drive motor, gear reducer, and coupling.

This design change does not negatively impact any accident

.response. This design change does not increase the probability or consequences of either an accident or a malfunction of equipment important to safety. Therefore, this design change does not involve an Unreviewed Safety Question.

2EE-0049, Pkg. 1, Circulating Water Traveling Screen Modification. This design change modifies the 22B Circulating Water Traveling Screen. The modification includes replacing the fish baskets, adding spray nozzles, providing a shield over the top of the spray nozzles, and replacing the drive motor, gear reducer, and coupling.

This design change does not negatively impact any accident response. This design change does not increase the probability or consequences of either an accident or a malfunction of equipment important to safety. Therefore, this design change does not involve an Unreviewed Safety Question.

2EE-0051, Pkg. 1, Circulating Water Traveling Screen Modification. This design change modifies the 23B Circulating Water Traveling Screen. The modification includes replacing the fish baskets, adding spray nozzles, providing a shield over the top of the spray nozzles, and replacing the drive motor, gear reducer, and coupling.

This design change does not negatively impact any accident response. This design change does not increase the probability or consequences of either an accident or a malfunction of equipment important to safety. Therefore, this design change does not involve an Unreviewed Safety Question.

Temporary Modifications Sununary of Safety Evaluations TMR 97-024, 22 Reactor Coolant Pump High Vibration Alarm Setpoint Change. This temporary modification changes the 22 Reactor Coolant Pump High Frame Vibration Alarm setpoint to 8.5 mils to clear a nuisance Control Room annunciator alarm, permit condition monitoring on the Reactor Coolant Pumps, and allow the 22 Reactor Coolant Pump to remain in service at a higher Reactor Coolant System temperature.

This temporary modification does not negatively impact any accident response. This temporary modification does not increase the probability or consequences of either an accident or a malfunction of equipment important to safety.

Therefore, this temporary modification does not involve an Unreviewed Safety Question.

Procedures Summary of Safety Evaluations TS2.SE-SU.ZZ-000l(Q), Rev. 11, Startup and Power Ascension Sequencing Procedure. This procedure controls the sequence in which Startup and Power Ascension test activities are performed. This procedure also establishes hold points to demonstrate acceptable plant performance, test results, and management review of performance and emergent issues. The safety evaluation associated with this revision determined the operational modes in which each of the postulated accidents in UFSAR Chapter 15 is applicable and identified the startup teat procedures and other activities that correspond to those postulated accidents.

The safety evaluation concluded that this procedure revision does not negatively impact any accident response. This procedure revision does not increase the probability or consequences of either an accident or a malfunction of equipment important to safety. Therefore, this procedure revision does not involve an Unreviewed Safety Question.

UFSAR Change Notices Summary of Safety Evaluations There were no changes in this category implemented during July, 1997.

Deficiency Reports Summary of Safety Evaluations There were no changes in this category implemented during July, 1997.

Other Summary of Safety Evaluation There were no changes in this category implemented during July, 1997.

OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No: 50-311¥ Date: 08/10/97 Compl*ated *by: Robert Phillips Telephone: 339-2735 Operating Status

1. Unit Name Salem No. 2 Notes
2. Reporting Period July 1997
3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411
4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170
5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115
6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149
7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net.MWe) 1106
8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give Reason.~~~~N~A-=-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--
9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) N/A
10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any ~~~~~~~~N~=A'--~~~~~~~~~~

This Month Year to Date cumulative

11. Hours in Reporting Period 744 5087 150036
12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 0 0 78083.6
13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 0 0 0
14. Hours Generator On-Line 0 0 75229.5
15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 0 0 0
16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 0 0 187781005
17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 0 0 78648598
18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) -22577 -73517 74622814
19. Unit Service Factor 0 o* 50.l
20. Unit Availability Factor 0 0 50.l
21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 0 0 45.0
22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 0 0 44.6
23. Unit Forced Outage Rate 100 100 36.2
24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each)

NA

25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of startup:

3rd quarter 1997.

8-1-7.R2

.ERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LE"'

Docket No.: 50-311 Unit Name: Salem #2 Date: 08/10/97 Completed by: Robert Phillips Telephone: 339-2735 Month July 1997 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 0 2 0 18 0 3 0 19 0 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0 11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 0 14 0 30 0 15 0 31 0 16 0 P. 8.1-7 Rl