ML18088A950

Environmental Technical Specification Change/Revision Substituting Section 3.2, Radiological Environmental Monitoring

ML18088A950
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	07/03/1975
From:	Robert E. Uhrig Florida Power & Light Co
To:	Anthony Giambusso Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-75-235
Download: ML18088A950 (29)

Text

NRC DISTRIBUTION FOR PART 50 DOCKET MATERIAL (TEMiPORARY FORM) 880

~68 F I Le

~

Envilo FROM.

Florida Power 5 L'ight Miami, Fla R E Uhrig

'7-3-75 7-8-75 DATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR XX TWX RPT OTHER Mr~ A Giambusso PROP INFO CLASS UNCLASS ORIG 3 si ed.

INPUT CC OTHER NO CYS REC'D 40 SENT LOCALPDR DOCKET NO:

5o-335 DESCRIPTION:

Ltr notarized, 7-3-75 trans'b the following:'CEPS 4~+

OXI/gyILE)g PLANT NAME:

St. Lucie gl ENCLOSURES:

Enviro Tech Spec Change:

consists of revision to Section 3828 Rediolodicel Enviro Monitoring........

40 copies encl rec'd FOR ACT(ON/INFORMATION wtm 7 '5

~BUTLER (L)

. W/) Copies CLARK (L)

W/ Copies PARR (L)

W/ Copies KNIEL (L)

,W/ Copies SCHWENCER (L)

W/ Copies STOLZ (L)

Vl/ Copies VASSALIO (0 W/ Copies PunPLE (0 W/ Copies ZIEMANN(L)

W/ Copies DICKER (E)

W/ Copies KNIGHTON (E)

W/ Copies YOUNGBLOOD W/ Copies

~REGAN (e)

W/tCopies LEAR (L)

W/ Copies SPIES W/ Copies (E)

W/ ~oP dies IMTERi~IAL DISTR I BUTION

~GC, ROOM P-506A r~GOSSI CK/STAF F

~ cAse G IAMBUSSO BOYD MOORI.= (L)

DEYOUNG (L)

SKOVHOLT (L)

GOL'Len (L) (Ltr)

P. COLLINS DENISE REG OPR

~ILE 5 REGION (2) 1lIPC TECH REVIEW jDENTON SCI-IROEDER

+

GRIMiES MACCARY GAMMILI KNIGHT

~KASTNER "PAWLICK I

+ BALLAR D SHAO SPANGLER STE LLO HOUSTON ENVIRO NOVAK f'MULLER ROSS DICKER IPPO LITO KNIGHTON

~TE D ESCO YOUNGB LOOD

>SeCOLLI1$ 8 REGAN

~ LAINAS PROJECT LDR yBENAROYA I IC ASST R. DIGGS (L)

H. GEAR IN (L)

E: GOULBOUBNE (L)

P. KREUTZER (E)

J. LEE (L)

M. re.":mRooe(L)

s. nEED (E)

M. SERVICE (L)

S. SHEPPARD (L)

M. SLATER (E)

I~.-SMITI~ (L)

S. TEETS (L)

G. WILLIAMS(E)

V. WILSON (L)

R. INGRAM (L)

M. l)UHCA'<

A/T IND.

BRAITMAN SALTZMAN MELTZ PLANS MCDONALD CHAPMAN DOBE (Ltr)

E. COUPE PETERSON HARTFIELD (2)

KLECKER E ISENHUT WIGGINTON EXTERNAL DISTI IBLITION r1 LocALPDR~MKR<F g

6 s1 Tlc (ABERNATI<Y(

(11 2)(csB NATIQNALLABs.i iU!4L)L fj1 NSIC (BUCHANAN) 1 W. PENNINGTON, Rrn E-201 GT 1 ASLB 1

CONSULTANTS 1 Newton Anderson NEWM ARK/BLUME/AGBA8IAN l(/(- ACRS i%28(XPIS1/SENT 1 PD R.SAN/LA/NY 1 BROOKHAVEN iNAT LAB 1 G. ULR I KSON 0 RN L

~

~

~

~ ~

~ 1

. BOX 013100, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33101

~~klllg

~

'S~

FLORIDA POWER 8L LIGHT COMPANY July 3, 1975 L-75-235 Nr. Angelo Gi'ambusso, Director Division of Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.

C.

20555

Dear Nr. Giambusso:

Re:

St. Lucie Unit No.

1 - Docket No. 50-335 Envir'onmenta'1 Te'chn'ic'al.S ecifica'tion'han e

Florida Power' Light Company hereb'y submits for your review three signed originals and 40 copies 'of revision 3 to the proposed St. Lucie 1 Environmental Technical Specifications.

This revision consists of substituting Section 3.2, Radiological Environmental Monitoring, with the attached revised Section 3.2, pages, 3-5 to 3-13g, with Rev.

3 7/3/75 appearing on the lower right-hand corner of each 'page.

Yours very truly, Robert E. Uhrig Vice President REU:nch Enclosure cc:

Jack R.

Newman, Esquire HELPING BUILD FLORIDA

l'ra

'f

STATE OF FLORIDA

)

)

SS COUNTY OF DADE

)

ROBERT E.

UHRIG, being first duly sworn, dep'oses'nd says:

That he is a Vice President of Florida Power 6 LightCompany, the Applicant herei'n; That he has executed the foregoing instrument; that the

'tatements made 'in this said instrument are 'true 'and correct to the 'best of his knowledge, information and belief; and that he is authorized to 'execute "the "instrument on behalf of said Applicant.

o ert r~g subscribed and sworn to before me ihi'a'L day of 1975 otary u

z.c zn an or t e ounty oX'"Dade,'tate of Florida MY coMMlssloN DIPIRK APRIL 2, 1976 Ol+Q55JAev aavaaaa noaama~

" Ny Commission expires I

u

"'<<err~I<<I i "

V

~"

l 4

l r

l

3.2 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Ob'ective The Radiological Environmental Surveillance Program is conducted to measure radiation levels and radioactivity in the environs, and to assist in verifying any projected or anticipated radio-activity release resulting from plant operations which could bring about public exposure to radiation.

Bases The environmental monitoring program is designed to determine existing radioactivity levels and to detect changes in radiation levels in the air, water and land environment which may be attributed to the operation of the unit.

The methods, procedures and techniques developed during the preoperational phase will be utilized to provide background measurements as a basis for distinguishing significant changes in radioactivity in the site environs.

S ecifications a)

Environmental samples shall be collected at designated locations (see Table 3.2-l and Figures 3.2-l and 3.2-2).

X/9 values by sector and the annual average X/0 at standard distances for such sampling locations are given

.in Tables 3.2-2 and 3.2-3, respectively.

Figure 3.2-3 relates the annual average wind speed and annual average X/0 to population density in each sector with respect to sampling location and the site center.

3-5 Rev.

3 7/3/75

3.2 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING (continued)

'I S ecifications (continued) b)

The type samples to be collected, the schedule of sample collection and the analyses to be made on each sample shall be done in the manner described in Table 3.2-4.

c)

The analyses required in this environmental surveillance program shall be completed either by (1) gamma spectroscopy, (2) beta analysis by liquid scintillation counting, or (3) by chemical separation prior to radioactivity analysis.

Table 3.2-S shows how these radioanalysis methods will be applied.

'Table 3.2-6 shows the detection capabilities of these methods and compares them with the recommended limits of Regulatory Guide 4.8.

d)

This schedule is designed to ensure that changes in the environmental radioactivity can be detected.

A continuing review and evaluation of the program will verify the suitability and adequacy of the environmental program.

e)

Recognition is given to the fact the results of the Radiological Environmental Surveillance Program will determine if there are impacts of plant operation on the environment.

As such, and when applicable, these results will be summarized, evaluated statistically, and assessed in order to interpret those impacts.

3-6 Rev.

3 7/3/75

TABLE 3.2.1 H03 PLANT ST.

LUCIE SITE:

LOCATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEILLANCE SAMPLING STATIONS (Bearin from Center Unit One Co'ntainment)

~Beanin Distance Meadowbrook Dairy, Glades Cut-off Road 260'2.526 km St. Lucie County H08 Florida Power 6 Light Company Substation 293'hite City, Weatherby Road west of U. S.

1 9.17 km H09 Hlo Florida Power 6 Light Company Substation 196'est of U. S.

1, just south of St. Lucie County Line Indian River Field Laboratory, University 300'f Florida, west of SR 713 11.745 km 19.308 km Hll City of Fort Pierce Water System Collected at St. Lucie County Health Department, Avenue "C", Ft. Pierce 323

14. 48 km H12 H13 Florida Power

& Light Company Substation 180'R 76 west of U.

S.

1, Stuart, Martin Co.

On Site, Point north of Big Mud Creek at 312'ndian River 19.308 km 1021 m

H14 H15 H16 H19 H22 H23 H24 H25 Employees Parking Lot, Southeast of Containment "On Site, Beach near Discharge Structure Beach (ocean) opposite Blind Creek On Site, Beach south of Intake Canal Lentz Groves, U. S.

1 Montauk Groves, U.

S.

1, south of Easy Street Poster

Groves, U.

S.

1, north of Tumblin King Road Childs Groves, Bell Avenue, west of Sunrise Blvd.

160 89'1'61O 210O 270o 300O 297o 503 m

808 m

1509 m

1494 m

8.849 km 7.562 km 8.608 km

11. 263 km 3-7 Rev.

3 7/3/75

1 I

SAMPLING STATIONS (continued)

Page 2

Bea~ince Distance H26 H30 H31 Wouters Groves, West of SR 713 on Immokola Road Residence, 7609 Indian River Drive, Ankona North Port Lucie Water System, Prima Vista Blvd.

3140 245o 250o

21. 72 km

3. 218 km 10.619 km H32 Department of Health and Rehabilitative 338'ervices Entomology Laboratory, East of U. S.

1, Vero Beach 30.571 km H33 H34 H36 H35 On Site, between

Canals, east of AIA On Site, Meteorological Tower On Site, Discharge Canal West of AIA On Site, Discharge Canal East of AIA 1380 027o 1010 0990 945 m

762 m

305 m

343 m

3-8 Rev.

3 7/3/75

P U

Ik

,C

E K

y)0~0 z roAO 4

Jt,} vf

~ I ~

I ~ Ot

~ 4V

~t\\v

~-Iti)-nni",'-'

u)

O f-ZO

~Cl~

K 0

0 o

CLg0 cL Cl-

~\\

t04 t

n g

I

~

((4 OJ I-

- cu~-

1(

7 04 4

~

~ r I

V VV t

~

ntt OVt I

--) V f

p 4'li A.

V m Oya(ml

,~04 I

4 f rI j

trn I

~yv j )

I't jff ol't OE Otl ~

I r

O(

tv O

~t!a5<

~}j g oC I

((V.;!'-L f(} L~f}"~ i'.

t, n

-V 4=f}--~-

f,lj t(

I tf Pt 4( Qnt

~V

~

VO

~ t W

PM tv

~O vl

(

I~}

I~

f Ort VI lilacI.

~r-O

} e zii':"

n ghee.r".

IV p'.'I I I ta'I I,

I t

~

Ci, "Igi!

I g,

t'el O

r.~

(

M~

V 0

. 4..O'I

't(Ot CO 0

~l~o LUO ZZ l-0 C3&~ CO~

HM~ uI<

OZU Z g

00 0 e OZ~ ~~CL

~ ~CL Cl ~CL Ct= UJ(O CO V)

I v

tp"'I,"

0 t

OO

'(Lo t

f f '<

I

~

j.c.',

4 ~

Of P

I.~'g

n'

',t.l(

I root OOO ~ ~

O

~

p f

r.f', (,

~ (.(I Iti

'III 4

,II( ',',ff !

(

',It

'Ill'

/

llI I

',( I"

~,t

(

II I '

i,lpo ('

~

II

~

I

%+wry t tt n

n

~

~t I ~

~

~t t t

4 4

5WOyi VQ$

OO Ql rt A

0 C

trj g

4)

I Ill-V8 br I1 RTL8 NWIC OCGR N 3-10 Rev.

3 7/3/75

h

TABLE 3.2-2 ST.

LUCIE SITE BY SECTOR X

Q Sector Wind Factors (mi/hr)

,A.

At 5 Miles; a =100m X

Average*

(s/m

)

SSW S

SW

. SSW WSW SW W WSW WNW -

W NW -

WNW NNW NW N NNW 0.049, 0.039, 0.054, 0.075, 0.100, 0.092, 0.096, 0.064, ll.1 10.1 9.7 9.3 8.9

.8. 1 8.6 8.4 9.04 x 8.61 E

7.57 E

7.37 E

8.87 E

1.06 E

8.67 E

5.84 E

10 8

8 8

8 7

8 8

B.

At 0.97 Miles; a =50m Z

S SSE SSE SE SE ESE ESE E

E ENE ENE NE NE NNE NNE N 0.033, 0.055, 0.035, 0.027, 0.040, 0.073, 0.050, 0.068, 8.8 7.9 7.5 6.6 7.5 7.9 8.7 8.3 9.69 E

1.03 E

1.17 E

1.09 E

8.06 E

6.93 E

6.43 E

5.37 E

7 6

6 6

7 7

7 7

• Period of Record:

Ol/Ol/73 to 12/31/73 3-11 Rev.

3 7/3/75

TABLE

3. 2-3 ST.

LUCIE SITE:

SECTOR ANNUAL AVERAGE X/9 at STANDARD DISTANCE SAMPLING LOCATIONS (a,b)

Station No.

HO3 (22.526 KIQ)

(W-WSW)

HO8 (9.17 m)

(W-WNW)

HO9 (11.74)

(S-SSW)

H10 (19. 308)

(fPW-Kf)

Hll (14.48 m)

(NW-NNW)

H12 (19. 308 m)

(S-SSE)

H13 (1021 m)

(NW-WNW)

H14 (503 m)

(S-SSW)

H15 (808 m)

(E-ESE)

H16 (1509 m)

(NNE-NE)

Population Density Code D

D D

D Average Annual (s/m

)

7.37E-8 8.87 E 8 9.04 E

8 1.05 E-7 8.7 E

8 9.1 E 8

l. 10 E

7 9.50 E 7 (c) 1 09 E 6 (c) 6.43 E 7 (c)

Vectors Sampled Milk-monthly.

Control Florida Milk Net Precipitation.=

Soil, Other Vegetation Air Particulates, Air Iodines, TLD Soil, Other Vegetation.

Air Particulates, Air Iodines, TLD Precipitation.

Food Crops, Other Vegetation Soil.

Air Particulates, Air Iodines, TLD Drinking Water Ft. Pierce Drinking Water Stuart Air Particulates, Air Iodines Indian River Water.

Bottom Sediment Air Particulates, Air Iodines, TLD Ocean Water, Bottom Sediment Ocean Water.

Bottom Sediment.

Beach Sand.

H19 (1449 m)

(S-SSE)

9. 69 E 7 (c)

Ocean Water.

Beach Sand 3-12 Rev.

3 7/3/75

Station No.

Population Densit Code Average Annual (S/M

)

Vectors Sam led H22 H23 H24 H25 H26 (8.849 Km)

(S.-SSW)

(7.562 Km)

(sw-ssw)

(8.608 Km)

(w-WNW)

(11.263 Km)

(W-WNW)

(21. 72 Km)

(NW-WNW)

D D

9.04 E 8 8.61 E

., 8 8.87 E 8 8.87 E 8 1.06 E

7 Food Crop Food Crop Food Crop Food Crop Food Crop H30 H31 H32 H33 H34 H36 (3.218 Km)

(s<<-ssw)

(10.619 Km)

(wsw-sw)

(30.571 Km)

(N-NNW)

(945 m)

(SE-SSE)

(762 m)

(N-NNW)

(305 m)

(E-ESE) 8.61 E

8 7.57 E 8 5.84 E 8 9.68 E 8 (c) 5.84 E

8 (c) 1.02 E 7 (c)

Drinking Water.

Air Particulates,. Air Iodines, TLD Drinking Water (Port St. Lucie)

CONTROL.

Precipitation Air Particulates, Air Iodines, TLD Air Particulates, Air Iodines, TLD Precipitation Air Particulates, Aii Iodines, TLD Discharge Canal water.

Bottom Sediment a) b)

c)

Period of Record:

01/Ol/73 to 12/31/73 Sampling locations specified by State of Florida, Department of 3iealth and Rehabilitative Services At 0.97 miles; all others at 5 miles 3-13 Rev.

3 7/3/75

~ 'f

~

I.

A i

J<<l jr t t.,!'.4

<<I i'i:.

~ ~

~

GURE 3. 2-3 St. Lucie Plant: X/ Q -- Wind Speed vs. Population Density (Period: Ol/01/73 to 12/31/73) ll i

~

~ 4(

~ I A

(8. 3)

S. 49 I

I

~ $4

<<r.

4<<<<+

4+

9000 l h

h i I

<<(

hh h<<4<<

)<<). LVl

) 9') c l.

)<<<<

ENC 0 QZ, f pg, i,;.

0 (,'<<,9990

~ '<<

'b (9) r '

(

4 ~ii Qi

/

>>i 44 pi4 490

)))

i pP

<<4 4)4 )

./

'i Vl

.l I

ll (I

~

~

I

<<(h 4 J~(<<hhh u

Q'Ql r

't, SM t

<<r h,

<<49

\\

(0 h~<<r)

~)'Q

~

0

'<<C9>

((4 l9)0 9000 f.~.l ssM.~..

ia

~;-.'o.'..r v<<4

~

~

h

)9 - '-i"'<<

V h

~

~

h4

~ +r

>> ~

V

~

h

~ <<<<

~

QC

~Population Density:

A= 0-100 C= 1,000-10,000 B= 100-1,000 D=

0 10,000

• • Annual Average Wind Speed

• • • Annual Average > / Q 3-13a Rev.

3 - 7/3/75

0

TABLE 3.2-4 SHEET 1

PLANT ST.

LUCIE:

OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE 1.

AIR CRITERIA AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS (1)

COLLECTION FRE{}UENCY (2)

TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS 1.1 Particulate and Iodine 1'.2 Direct Radiation 2.

WATER 2.1 Surface Water 2.1.1 Discharge Canal 2.1.2 Ocean Comparison on-site versus off-site 6 reference locations:

3 locations on-site, north, east, a southeast of the plant H 34, H 14, H 33 6 locations off-site within radius of 10 miles of plant H 08, H 09, H 10, H 12, H 30, H 32 Comparison of on-site versus off-site a reference locations:

3 locations on-site, north, east,

& southeast of the plant H 34, H 14, H 33 6 locations off-site within a radius of 10 miles of plant H 08, H 09, H 10, H 12, H 30, H 32 1 location, west of AlA, H 36 2 locations, H 15,- a H 32 (control)

Weekly Quarterly Monthly Monthly Gross Beta (Weekly Gamma spectral analysis of monthly composite Radioactive Iodine (Weekly)

SR 89, 90 (Quarterly Composite)

Determine direct radia-tion exposure by TLD readout (mean of 2 TLDs)

(3)

Gamma spectral an is Tritium (Quarterly Composite)

Sr-89, 90 (Quarterly Composite)

Gamma spectral analysis Tritium (Quarterly Composite)

Sr-89, 90 (Quarterly Composite) 3-13b Rev.

3 7/3/75

TABLE 3.2-4 SHEET 2 PLANT ST.

LUCZE:

OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE CRITERIA AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS (1)

COLLECTION FREQUENCY (2)

TYPE OF FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS 2.1.3 Estuarine 2.2 Ground Water (wells) 2.3 Potable Water (wells) 3.

BOTTOM SEDIMENT 3.1 Discharge Canal 3.2 Ocean-3.3 Beach (sand) 1 location, Big Mud Creek, H 13 1 location, Residence, 7609 Indian River Drive, H 30 1 location, City of Ft. Pierce, drinking water supply, H 11 1 location, City of Stuart, drinking water

supply, H 12 1 location, Port St. Lucie, drinking water supply H 31 1 location, west of A1A, H 36 1 location, beach west of discharge structure, H 15 1 location, offshore, 1 mile north of discharge, H 16 1 location, offshore, 1 mile south of discharge, H 19 1 location, offshore, Vero Beach, H 32 (control) 1 location, east of Blind Creek, 1 mile north of discharge, H 16 1 location, near intake, 1 mile south of discharge, H 19 1 location, Vero Beach, H 32 (control)

Quarterly Semi-annually Quarterly Semiannually, Semi-annually Semi-annually Gamma spectral.

analysis Tritium Gamma spectral analysis Gross Beta Tritium Gamma spectral analysis Gross Beta Tritium Gamma spectral analysis Sr-90=

Gamma spectral analysis Sr-90 Gamma spectral analysis Sr-90 3-13c Rev.

3 - 7/3/75

TABLE 3.2-4 SHEET 3

PLANT ST. LUCIE:

OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR. SAMPLE 3.4 Estuarine 4.

AQUATIC BIOTA 4.1 Crustacea Lobster or crab or shrimp 4.2 Fish 4.2.1 Carnivores 4.2.2 Herbivores 5.

TERRESTRIAL 5.1 Milk CRITERIA AND SAMPL1NG LOCATIONS (1) 1 location, Big Mud Creek, H 13 1 location, vicinity of discharge structure, H 15 1 location, Vero Beach; H 32 (control) 1 location, vicinity of discharge structure, H 15 1 location, Vero Beach, H 32 (control) 1 location, vicinity of discharge structure, H 15 1 location, Vero Beach, H 32 (control) 1 location within 15 mile radius of plant and in the prevailing wind direction from the plant, H 03 1 location, Florida (state) Milk Shed (4) s Dairy herd census (5)

COLLECTION FREQUENCY (2)

Semi-annually Semi-annually Semi-annually Semi-annually Monthly Semi-annually TYPE OF FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS Gamma spectral analysis Gamma spectral an is Gamma spectral analysis Sr-89, 90 Gamma spectral analysis Sr-89, 90 Gamma spectral analysis Sr-89, 90 I-131 5.2 Biota 5.2.1 Food Crop (Citrus) 6 locations, H 10, H 22, H 23, H 24, H 25, H 26 1 location, Vero Beach, H

Harvest time Gamma spectral analysis Sr 89, 90 5.2.2 Food Crop (Edible Leafy Vegetation) 1 location as determined by garden census (6)

Harvest time Gamma spectral analysis I-131 3-13d Rev.

3 7/3/75

TABLE 3.2-4 SHEET 4

PLANT ST.

LUCIE:

OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE 5.3 Soil CRITERIA AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS (1) 5 locations within a 15 mile radius of

plant, H 03, H 30, H 08, H 09, H 10 1 location, Vero Beach, H 32 (control)

COLLECTION FREQUENCY (2)

TYPE OF FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS'nce per 3-year period Gamma spectral analysis Sr-90 (1)

Samples will be taken whenever biologically available.

(2)

Frequency definitions follow:

Weekly-Monthly Quarterly Semi-annually Not less than 48 times per annum interval,may vary by 3 days.

Not less than 12 times per annum - interval may very by 15 days.

Not less than 4 times per annum - interval may vary by 30 days.

Not less than 2 times per annum interval may vary by 60 days.

(3)

"Fading" in TLD's minimized by annealing before analysis.

(4)

Random samplings made by either state and/or county health groups.

(5)

Semi-annual Census; location and number of dairy herds within 5-mile radius of plant, as determined by County Agricultural Agent.

(6) If Semi-annual Census in (5) above reveals no dairy herds within 5-mile radius of plant an 2

I annual census will be made of gardens 500 ft., or greater, within a 5-mile radius. of the plant, by contacting the County Agricultural Agent. If existing,'he closest such garden will be sampled.

~

3-13e Rev.

3 7/3/75

TABLE 3.2-5 PLANT ST.

LUCIE:

OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM TYPE OF ANALYSIS 1.

Gamma S ectrosco Ce-144 I-131 RQ-106 Cs-134 Cs-137 Zr-95 Mn-54 Zn-65 Ba-140 K-40 Ra-226 Th-232 Co-58 Co-60 Cr-51 2.

Beta Li uid Scintillation S ectrosco H-3 C-14 P-32 3.

Chemical Se aration and Anal sis Sr-89 Sr-90 3-13 f Rev.

3 7/3/75

f'

~

E L

II $

t A

i

TABLE 3.2-6 COMPARISON OF STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVESERVICES DETECTION CAPABILITIES WITH THOSE RECOMMENDED IN PROPOSED REGULATORY GUIDE 4.8 n~nal sis Water

( Cz/1)

Detection Airborne Particulate

( Ci/m

)

3 Detect>on Fish, Meat, Poultr (pCi/kg wet)

Detection PRL Gross Beta Tritium Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Sr-89 Sr-90 Zr-Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 2.0 300.0 15.0 30.0 15.0 15.0 30.0 10.0 2.0 10.0 0.4 15.0 15.0 15.0 1.0 256. 0 8.0 9.0 9.0

18. 0 2.0 1.0 9.0 9.8 8.0 9.0 10.0 1.0 200.0 14.0 17.0 17.0 31.0 5.0 1.0 14.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0

0. 003

0. 005

0. 001 0.07 0.01 0;01 0.007 0.003 0.017 0.003 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.03

0. 003

0. 003 130. 0 260. 0 130.0 130. 0 260.0 40.0 8.0 130. 0 130. 0 22.0 6.0 24.0

26. 0 50.0 10.0 5.0

36. 0 2.0 72.0 72.0 14.0 6.0 23.0 72.0 23.0 48.0 Counting Geometry ***

3.5 liter 3.5 liter 1.0 liter Analysis Milk

( Ci 1)

Ve etation

( Ci/k wet)

Soil

( Ci/k dr

)

Detection Ca RG 4.8 LLD PRL Detection Cap.

RG 4.8 LLD PRL Detection Sr-89 Sr-90 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137

10. 0 2.0 0.4 15.0 15.0 2.0 1.0 9.8 8.0 9.0 5.0 1.0

10. 0

10. 0

10. 0 80.0

'0.

0

80. 0 21.0 8.0 9.0 36.0 10.0 10.0 150. 0 150. 0 150. 0 13.0 90.0 34.0 105.0 34.0 70.0 Counting Geometry ***

3.S liter 3.S liter

,l. 0 liter The nominal LLD as defined in HASL 300 (rev. 8/74), pp.

08-01, 02, 03 at the 95% confidence level.

The LLD's are decay corrected to the end of the total sampling period.

LLD = Lowest Limits of Detection; PRL = Practical Reporting Limits.

Counting system calibrated for Marinelli breakers of the sizes shown.

3-13g Rev.

3 7/3/75

e>>

4 I

C