ML17305A057
| ML17305A057 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oregon State University (R-106) |
| Issue date: | 10/30/2017 |
| From: | Reese S Oregon State University |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML17305A057 (82) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:usu Radiation Center Oregon State University. 100 Radiation Center, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-5903 T 541-737-2341IF541-737-0480 I http://ne.oregonstate.edu/facilities/radiation_center Oregon State UNIVERSITY October 30, 2017 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Reference:
Oregon State University TRIGA Reactor (OSTR) Docket No. 50-243, License No. R-106 In accordance with section 6.7.1 of the OSTR Technical Specifications, we are hereby submitting the Oregon State University Radiation Center and OSTR Annual Report for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. The Annual Report continues the pattern established over many years by including information about the entire Radiation Center rather than concentrating primarily on the reactor. Because this report addresses a number of different interests, it is rather lengthy, but we have incorporated a short executive summary which highlights the Center's activities and accomplishments over the past year. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on: 1o/'3oL7 . I I Sincerely, /!~ / t~1i/f;;:e Director Cc: Michael Balazik, USNRC Ossy Font, USNRC Ken Niles, ODOE Dr. Cynthia Sagers, OSU Dan Harlan, OSU
Submitted by: Steve R. Reese, Director Radiation Center Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon 97331-5903 Telephone: (541) 737-2341 Fax: (541) 737-0480 To satisy the requirements of: A. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, License No. R-106 (Docket No. 50-243), Technical Specification 6.7(e). B. Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC; Subcontract Award No. 00074510. C. Oregon Department of Energy, OOE Rule No. 345-030-010.
Con_t:en_t:s Part I-Overview Executive Summary..................................................................................................................................... 4 lntroduction.................................................................................................................................................... 4 Overview of the Radiation Center.......................................................................................................... 4 Part II-People Radiation Center Staff................................................................................................................................. 6 Reactor Operations Committee.............................................................................................................. 6 Professional & Research Faculty.............................................................................................................. 7 Part Ill-Facilities Research Reactor.......................................................................................................................................... 8 Analytical Equipment.................................................................................................................................. 9 Radioisotope Irradiation Sources............................................................................................................ 9 Laboratories & Classrooms...................................................................................................................... 10 Instrument Repair & Calibration............................................................................................................ 10 Library................................................................................ 1 **************************************************************************** 10 Part IV-Reactor Operating Statistics.................................................................................................................................... 14 Experiments Performed........................................................................................................................... 14 Unplanned Shutdowns............................................................................................................................. 15 Changes Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59...................................................................................................... 15 Surveillance & Maintenance................................................................................................................... 16 Part V-Radiation Protection lntroduction.................................................................................................................................................. 28 Environmental Releases........................................................................................................................... 28 Personnel Doses.......................................................................................................................................... 29 Facility Survey Data.................................................................................................................................... 30 Environmental Survey Data.................................................................................................................... 30 Radioactive Material Shipments........................................................................................................... 31 References..................................................................................................................................................... 31 Part VI-Work Summary....................................................................................................................................................... 50 Teaching......................................................................................................................................................... 50 Research & Service..................................................................................................................................... 50 Part VII-Words Documents Published or Accepted..................................................................................................... 72 Presentations................................................................................................................................................ 7 4 Students......................................................................................................................................................... 77
Tables Table Title Page 11 1.1 Gammacell 220 6°Co lrradiator Use............................................ 11 111.2 Student Enrollment in Courses at the Radiation Center............................... 12 IV.1 Present OSTR Operating Statistics............................................ 17 IV.2 OSTR Use Time in Terms of Specific Use Categories.................................. 18 IV.3 OSTR Multiple Use Time................................................... 18 IV.4 Use of OSTR Reactor Experiments............................................ 19 IV.5 Unplanned Reactor Shutdowns and Scrams...................................... 19 V. l Radiation Protection Program Requirements and Frequencies.......................... 32 V.2 Monthly Summary of Liquid Effluent Releases to the Sanitary Sewer...................... 33 V.3 Annual Summary of Liquid Waste Generated and Transferred........................... 34 V.4 Monthly Summary of Gaseous Effluent Releases................................... 35 V.5 Annual Summary of Solid Waste Generated and Transferred............................ 36 V.6 Annual Summary of Personnel Radiation Doses Received............................. 37 V.7 Total Dose Equivalent Recorded Within the TRIGA Reactor Facility....................... 38 V.8 Total Dose Equivalent Recorded on Area Within the Radiation Center...................... 39 V.9 Annual Summary of Radiation and Contamination Levels Within the Reactor................. 41 V.10 Total Dose Equivalent at the TRIGA Reactor Facility Fence............................. 42 V.11 Total Dose Equivalent at the Off-Site Gamma Radiation Monitoring Stations................. 43 V.12 Annual Average Concentration of the Total Net Beta Radioactivity........................ 44 V.13 Beta-Gamma Concentration and Range of LLD Values............................... 45 V.14 Radioactive Material Shipments under NRC General License R-106....................... 46 V.15 Radioactive Material Shipments under Oregon License ORE 90005....................... 47 V.1 6 Radioactive Material Shipments Under NRC General License 10 CFR 110.23................. 47 Vl.1 Institutions and Agencies Which Utilized the Radiation Center.......................... 52 Vl.2 Listing of Major Research & Service Projects Performed and Their Funding.................. 56 Vl.3 Summary of Radiological Instrumentation Calibrated to Support OSU Departments............ 70 Vl.4 Summary of Radiological Instrumentation Calibrated to Support Other Agencies............. 71 Figures Table Title Page IV. l Monthly Surveillance and Maintenance (Sample Form)................................................................................................. 20 IV.2 Quarterly Surveillance and Maintenance (Sample Form)............................................................................................... 21 IV.3 Semi-Annual Surveillance and Maintenance (Sample Form)........................................................................................ 23 IV.4 Annual Surveillance and Maintenance (Sample Form)................................................................................................... 25 V. l Monitoring Stations for the OSU TRIGA Reactor.............................................................................................................49 Vl.1 Summary of the Types of Radiological Instrumentation Calibrated..........................................................................70
Overview Executive Summary The data from this reporting year shows that the use of the Radiation Center and the Oregon State TRJGA reactor (OSTR) has continued to grow in many areas. The Radiation Center supported 69 different courses this year, mostly in the School of Nuclear Science and Engineering. About 26% of these courses involved the OSTR. The num-ber ofOSTR hours used for academic courses and training was 20, while 3,262 hours were used for research projects. Seventy-nine percent (79%) of the OSTR research hours were in support of off-campus research projects, reflecting the use of the OSTR nationally and internationally. Radiation Center users published or submitted 38 articles this year, and made 58 presentations on work that involved the OSTR or Radiation Center. The number of samples irradiated in the reactor during this reporting period was I, 143. Funded OSTR use hours com-prised 90% of the research use. Personnel at the Radiation Center conducted 148 tours of the facility, accommodating 3,709 visitors. The visitors included elementary, middle school, high school, and college students; relatives and friends; faculty; current and prospective clients; national laboratory and industrial scientists and engineers; and state, federal and international officials. The Radiation Center is a significant positive attraction on campus because visitors leave with a good impression of the facility and of Oregon State University. The Radiation Center projects database continues to provide a useful way of tracking the many different aspects of work at the facility. The number of projects supported this year was 169. Reactor related projects comprised 70% of all projects. The total research dollars in some way supported by the Radia-tion Center, as reported by our researchers, was $24.4 million. The actual total is likely considerably higher. This year the Ra-diation Center provided service to 65 different organizations/ institutions, 43% of which were from other states and 40% of which were from outside the U. S. and Canada. So while the Center's primary mission is local, it is also a facility with a national and international clientele. The Radiation Center web site provides an easy way for potential users to evaluate the Center's facilities and capabili-ties as well as to apply for a project and check use charges. The Introduction The current annual report of the Oregon State University Radiation Center and TRIGA Reactor follows the usual format by including information relating to the entire Radiation Center rather than just the reactor. However, the information is still presented in such a manner that data on the reactor may be examined separately, if desired. It should be noted that all annual data given in this report covers the period from July I, 2016 through June 30, 2017. Cumulative reactor operating data in this report relates only to the LEU fueled core. This covers the period beginning July I, 2008 to the present date. For a summary of data on the reactor's two other cores, the reader is referred to previous annual reports. In addition to providing general information about the activi-ties of the Radiation Center, this report is designed to meet the reporting requirements of the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U. S. Department of Energy, and the Oregon Department of Energy. Because of this, the report is divided into several distinct parts so that the reader may easily find the sections of interest. Overview of the Radiation Center The Radiation Center is a unique facility which serves the en-tire OSU campus, all other institutions within the Oregon Uni-versity System, and many other universities and organizations throughout the nation and the world. The Center also regularly provides special services to state and federal agencies, particu-larly agencies dealing with law enforcement, energy, health, and environmental quality, and renders assistance to Oregon industry. In addition, the Radiation Center provides permanent office and laboratory space for the OSU School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, the OSU Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering, and for the OSU nuclear chemistry, radiation chemistry, geochemistry and radiochemistry programs. There is no other university facility with the combined capabilities of the OSU Radiation Center in the western half of the United States. Located in the Radiation Center are many items of specialized equipment and unique teaching and research facilities. address is: http://radiationcenter.oregonstate.edu.
- 16-17 Annual Report
- ======.. --..
Overview They include a TRI GA Mark II research nuclear reactor; a 60Co gamma irradiator; a large number of state-of-the art computer-based gamma radiation spectrometers and associat-ed germanium detectors; and a variety of instruments for ra-diation measurements and monitoring. Specialized facilities for radiation work include teaching and research laboratories with instrumentation and related equipment for performing neutron activation analysis and radiotracer studies; laborato-ries for plant experiments involving radioactivity; a facility for repair and calibration ofradiation protection instrumenta-tion; and facilities for packaging radioactive materials for shipment to national and international destinations. A major non-nuclear facility housed in the Radiation Center is the one-quarter scale thermal hydraulic advanced plant ex-perimental (APEX) test facility for the Westinghouse AP600 and APl 000 reactor designs. The AP600 and API 000 are next-generation nuclear reactor designs which incorporate many passive safety features as well as considerably simpli-fied plant systems and equipment. APEX operates at pres-sures up to 400 psia and temperatures up to 450°F using elec-trical heaters instead of nuclear fuel. All major components of the AP600 and AP I 000 are included in APEX and all systems are appropriately scaled to enable the experimental measurements to be used for safety evaluations and licensing of the full scale plant. This world-class facility meets exact-ing qua I ity assurance criteria to provide assurance of safety as well as validity of the test results. Also housed in the Radiation Center is the Advanced Ther-mal Hydraulics Research Laboratory (ATHRL), which is used for state-of-the-art two-phase flow experiments. The Multi-Application Light Water Reactor (MASLWR) is a nuclear power plant test facility that is instrumental in the development of next generation commercial nuclear reactors currently seeking NRC certification. The Test Facility is con-structed of all stainless steel components and is capable of operation at full system pressure (1500 psia), and full system temperature (600F). All components are 1/3 scale height and 1/254.7 volume scale. The current testing program is examining methods for natural circulation startup, helical steam generator heat transfer performance, and a wide range of design basis, and beyond design basis, accident conditions. In addition, the MASLWR Test Facility is currently the focus of an interna-tional collaborative standard problem exploring the operation and safety of advanced natural circulations reactor concepts. Over 7 international organizations are involved in this stan-dard problem at OSU. The Advanced Nuclear Systems Engineering Laboratory (ANSEL) is the home to two major thermal-hydraulic test facilities-the High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) and the Hydro-mechanical Fuel Test Facility (HMFTF). The HTTF is a 1/4 scale model of the Modular High Temperature Gas Reactor. The vessel has a ceramic lined upper head and shroud capable of operation at 850oC (well mixed helium). The design will allow for a maximum operating pressure of 1.0MPa and a maximum core ceramic temperature of 1600°C. The nominal working fluid will be helium with a core power of approximately 600 kW (note that electrical heaters are used to simulate the core power). The test facility also includes a scaled reactor cavity cooling systein, a circulator and a heat sink in order to complete the cycle. The HTTF can be used to simulate a wide range of accident scenarios in gas reac-tors to include the depressurized conduction cooldown and pressurized conduction cooldown events. The HMFTF is a testing facility which will be used to produce a database of hydro-mechanical information to supplement the qualifica-tion of the prototypic ultrahigh density U-Mo Low Enriched Uranium fuel which will be implemented into the U.S. High Performance Research Reactors upon their conversion to low enriched fuel. This data in turn will be used to verify current theoretical hydro-and thermo-mechanical codes being used during safety analyses. The maximum operational pressure of the HMFTF is 600 psig with a maximum operational tem-perature of 450°F. The Radiation Center staff regularly provides direct sup-port and assistance to OSU teaching and research programs. Areas of expertise commonly involved in such efforts include nuclear engineering, nuclear and radiation chemistry, neutron activation analysis, radiation effects on biological systems, ra-diation dosimetry, environmental radioactivity, production of short-lived radioisotopes, radiation shielding, nuclear instru-mentation, emergency response, transportation of radioactive materials, instrument calibration, radiation health physics, radioactive waste disposal, and other related areas. In addition to formal academic and research support, the Center's staff provides a wide variety of other services includ-ing public tours and instructional programs, and professional consultation associated with the feasibility, design, safety, and execution of experiments using radiation and radioactive materials. 16-17 Annual Report
People This section contains a listing of all people who were residents of the Radiation Center or who worked a significant amount of time at the Center during this reporting period. It should be noted that not all of the faculty and students who used the Radiation Center for their teaching and research are listed. Summary information on the number of people involved is given in Table Vl.1, while individual names and projects are listed in Table VI.2. Radiation Center Staff Steve Reese, Director Dina Pope, Office Manager Tara DiSante, Business Manager Erica Emerson, Receptionist S. Todd Keller, Reactor Administrator Celia Oney, Reactor Supervisor, Senior Reactor Operator Robert Schickler, Reactor Engineer, Senior Reactor Operator Scott Menn, Senior Health Physicist Kyle Combs, Health Physicist Leah Mine, Neutron Activation Analysis Manager Steve Smith, Development Engineer, Sen ior Reactor Operator Chris Ku/ah, Senior Reactor Operator Erin Cimbri, Custodian Joshua Graves, Reactor Operator (Student) Trevor Howard, Reactor Operator (Student) Griffen Latimer, Reactor Operator (Student) Quinn Miller, Health Physics Monitor (Student) Destry Jensen, Health Physics Monitor (Student) Sophia Uchiyama, Health Physics Monitor (Student) Reactor Operations Committee Dan Harlan, Chair OSU Radiation Safety Abi Tavakoli Farsoni OSU Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics S. Todd Keller OSU Radiation Center Scott Menn OSU Radiation Center Celia Oney (not voting) OSU Radiation Center Steve Reese (not voting) OSU Radiation Center Julie Tucker OSU Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Haori Yang OSU Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics 16-17 Annual Report
Professional and Research Faculty Farsoni, Abi Associate Professor, Nuclear Engineering & Radiation Health Physics John DeNoma Research Assistant
- Hamby, David Professor, Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics Hart, Lucas P.
Faculty Research Associate, Chemistry
- Higley, Kathryn A.
Department Head, Professor, Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics
- Keller, S. Todd Reactor Administrator, Radiation Center Klein, Andrew C.
Professor, Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics
- Krane, Kenneth S.
Professor Emeritus, Physics
- Loveland, Walter D.
Professor, Chemistry Marcum, Wade Assistant Professor Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics
- Menn, Scott A.
Senior Health Physicist, Radiation Center
- Mine, Leah Associate Professor, Anthropology Palmer, Camille Research Faculty and Instructor People
- Palmer, Todd S.
Professor, Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics
- Paulenova, Alena Associate Professor, Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics Pope, Dina Office Manager, Radiation Center Ranjbar, Leila Instructor
- Reese, Steven R.
Director, Radiation Center Reyes, Jr., Jose N. Professor, Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics Tack, Krystina Assistant Professor, Medical Physics Program Director
- Celia Oney Reactor Supervisor, Radiation Center Aaron Weiss Faculty Research Assistant Woods, Brian Professor, Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics Wu, Qiao Professor, Nuclear Engineer and Radiation Health Physics Yanez, Ricardo Faculty Research Associate, Chemistry Yang, Haori Assistant Professor, Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics
- OSTR users for research and/or teaching 16-17 Annual Report
Facilit:ies Research Reactor The Oregon State University TRI GA Reactor (OSTR) is a water-cooled, swimming pool type research reactor which uses uranium/zirconium hydride fuel elements in a circular grid array. The reactor core is surrounded by a ring of graphite which serves to reflect neutrons back into the core. The core is situated near the bottom of a 22-foot deep water-filled tank, and the tank is surrounded by a concrete bioshield which acts as a radiation shield and structural support. The reactor is li-censed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to operate at a maximum steady state power of 1.1 MW and can also be pulsed up to a peak power of about 2500 MW. The OSTR has a number of different irradiation facilities including a pneumatic transfer tube, a rotating rack, a thermal column, four beam ports, five sample holding (dummy) fuel elements for special in-core irradiations, an in-core irradiation tube, and a cadmium-lined in-core irradiation tube for experi-ments requiring a high energy neutron flux. The pneumatic transfer facility enables samples to be inserted and removed from the core in four to five seconds. Consequently this facility is normally used for neutron activa-tion analysis involving short-lived radionuclides. On the other hand, the rotating rack is used for much longer irradiation of samples (e.g., hours). The rack consists of a circular array of 40 tubular positions, each of which can hold two sample tubes. Rotation of the rack ensures that each sample will receive an identical irradiation. The reactor's thermal column consists of a large stack of graphite blocks which slows down neutrons from the reactor core in order to increase thermal neutron activation of samples. Over 99% of the neutrons in the thermal column are thermal neutrons. Graphite blocks are removed from the thermal col-umn to enable samples to be positioned inside for irradiation. The beam ports are tubular penetrations in the reactor's main concrete shield which enable neutron and gamma radiation to stream from the core when a beam port's shield plugs are removed. The neutron radiography facility utilized the tangen-tial beam port (beam port #3) to produce ASTM E545 category I radiography capability. The other beam ports are available for a variety of experiments. 16-17 Annual Report
If samples to be irradiated require a large neutron fl uence, especially from higher energy neutrons, they may be inserted into a dummy fuel element. This device will then be placed into one of the core's inner grid positions which would nor-mally be occupied by a fuel element. Similarly samples can be placed in the in-core irradiation tube (ICIT) which can be inserted in the same core location. The cadmium-lined in-core irradiation tube (CLICIT) enables samples to be irradiated in a high flux region near the center of the core. The cadmium lining in the fac ility elimi-nates thermal neutrons and thus permits sample exposure to higher energy neutrons only. The cadmium-lined end of this air-fi lied aluminum irradiation tube is inserted into an inner grid position of the reactor core which would normally be oc-cupied by a fuel element. It is the same as the ICIT except for the presence of the cadmium lining. The two main uses of the OSTR are instruction and research. Instruction Instructional use of the reactor is twofold. First, it is used sig-nificantly for classes in Nuclear Engineering, Radiation Health Physics, and Chemistry at both the graduate and undergradu-ate levels to demonstrate numerous principles which have been presented in the classroom. Basic neutron behavior is the same in small reactors as it is in large power reactors, and many demonstrations and instructional experiments can be performed using the OSTR which cannot be carried out with a commercial power reactor. Shorter-term demonstration experi-ments are also performed for many undergraduate students in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology classes, as well as for visitors from other universities and colleges, from high schools, and from public groups. The second instructional application of the OSTR involves educating reactor operators, operations managers, and health physicists. The OSTR is in a unique position to provide such education since curricula must include hands-on experience at an operating reactor and in associated laboratories. The many types of educational programs that the Radiation Center pro-vides are more fully described in Part VI of this report. During this reporting period the OSTR accommodated a number of different OSU academic classes and other aca-demic programs. In addition, portions of classes from other Oregon universities were also supported by the OSTR. Facilities Research The OSTR is a unique and valuable tool for a wide variety of research applications and serves as an excellent source of neutrons and/or gamma radiation. The most commonly used experimental technique requiring reactor use is instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA). This is a particularly sensitive method of elemental analysis which is described in more detail in Part VI. The OSTR's irradiation facilities provide a wide range of neutron flux levels and neutron flux qualities which are suf-ficient to meet the needs of most researchers. This is true not only for fNAA, but also for other experimental purposes such as the 39 Ar/40 Ar ratio and fission track methods of age dat-ing samples. Analytical Equipment The Radiation Center has a large variety of radiation detec-tion instrumentation. This equipment is upgraded as neces-sary, especially the gamma ray spectrometers with their associated computers and germanium detectors. Additional equipment for classroom use and an extensive inventory of portable radiation detection instrumentation are also avail-able. Radiation Center nuclear instrumentation receives intensive use in both teaching and research applications. ln addition, service projects also use these systems and the combined use often results in 24-hour per day schedules for many of the analytical instruments. Use of Radiation Center equipment extends beyond that located at the Center and instrumentation may be made available on a loan basis to OSU researchers in other departments. Radioisotope Irradiation Sources The Radiation Center is equipped with a I 0,200 curie (as of June, 20 I 5) Gammacell 220 6°Co irradiator which is capable of delivering high doses of gamma radiation over a range of dose rates to a variety of materials. Typically, the irradiator is used by researchers wishing to perform mutation and other biological effects studies; studies in the area of radiation chem istry; dosimeter testing; steril-ization of food materials, soils, sediments, biological speci-men, and other media; gamma radiation damage studies; and 16-17 Annual Report
Facilities other such applications. ln addition to the 6°Co irradiator, the Center is also equipped with a variety of smaller 60Co, 137Cs, 226Ra, plutonium-beryllium, and other isotopic sealed sources of various radioactivity levels which are available for use as irradiation sources. During this reporting period there was a diverse group of projects using the 6°Co irradiator. These projects included the irradiation of a variety of biological materials including dif-ferent types of seeds. In addition, the irradiator was used for sterilization of several media and the evaluation of the radiation effects on different materials. Table III. I provides use data for the Gammacell 220 irradiator. Laboratories and Classrooms The Radiation Center is equipped with a number of different radioactive material laboratories designed to accommodate research projects and classes offered by various OSU aca-demic departments or off-campus groups. Instructional facilities available at the Center include a labo-ratory especially equipped for teaching radiochemistry and a nuclear instrumentation teaching laboratory equipped with modular sets of counting equipment which can be configured to accommodate a variety of experiments involving the mea-surement of many types of radiation. The Center also has two student computer rooms. ln addition to these dedicated instructional facilities, many other research laboratories and pieces of specialized equip-ment are regularly used for teaching. ln particular, classes are routinely given access to gamma spectrometry equipment located in Center laboratories. A number of classes also regu-larly use the OSTR and the Reactor Bay as an integral part of their instructional coursework. There are two classrooms in the Radiation Center which are capable of holding about 35 and 18 students. In addition, there are two smaller conference rooms and a library suitable for graduate classes and thesis examinations. As a service to the student body, the Radiation Center also provides an office area for the student chapters of the American Nuclear Society and the Health Physics Society. All of the laboratories and classrooms are used extensively during the academic year. A listing of courses accommodated at the Radiation Center during this reporting period along with their enrollments is given in Table 111.2. Instrument Repair & Calibration Facility The Radiation Center has a facility for the repair and calibra-tion of essentially all types ofradiation monitoring instru-mentation. This includes instruments for the detection and measurement of alpha, beta, gamma, and neutron radiation. Jt encompasses both high range instruments for measuring intense radiation fields and low range instruments used to measure environmental levels of radioactivity. The Center's instrument repair and calibration facility is used regularly throughout the year and is absolutely essential to the continued operation of the many different programs carried out at the Center. In addition, the absence of any comparable facility in the state has led to a greatly expanded instrument calibration program for the Center, including calibration of es-sentially all radiation detection instruments used by state and federal agencies in the state of Oregon. This includes instru-ments used on the OSU campus and all other institutions in the Oregon University System, plus instruments from the Oregon Health Division's Radiation Protection Services, the Oregon Department of Energy, the Oregon Public Utilities Commis-sion, the Oregon Health and Sciences University, the Army Corps of Engineers, and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Library The Radiation Center has a library containing a significant col-lections of texts, research reports, and videotapes relating to nuclear science, nuclear engineering, and radiation protection. The Radiation Center is also a regular recipient of a great vari-ety of publications from commercial publishers in the nuclear field, from many of the professional nuclear societies, from the U. S. Department of Energy, the U. S. Nuclear Regula-tory Commission, and other federal agencies. Therefore, the Center library maintains a current collection ofleading nuclear research and regulatory documentation. In addition, the Center has a collection ofa number of nuclear power reactor Safety Analysis Reports and Environmental Reports specifically prepared by utilities for their facilities. 16-17 Annual Report
The Center maintains an up-to-date set of reports from such organizations as the International Commission on Radiologi-cal Protection, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, and the International Commission on Radiological Units. Sets of the current U.S. Code of Federal Regulations for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other appropriate federal agencies, plus regulations of various state regulatory agencies are also available at the Center. The Radiation Center videotape library has over one hundred tapes on nuclear engineering, radiation protection, and radio-logical emergency response topics. In addition, the Radiation Facilities Center uses videotapes for most of the technical orienta-tions which are required for personnel working with radia-tion and radioactive materials. These tapes are reproduced, recorded, and edited by Radiation Center staff, using the Center's videotape equipment and the facilities of the OSU Communication Media Center. The Radiation Center library is used mainly to provide ref-erence material on an as-needed basis. It receives extensive use during the academic year. In addition, the orientation videotapes are used intensively during the beginning of each term and periodically thereafter. Table 111.1 Gammacell 220 60(0 lrradiator Use Purpose of Irradiation Samples Dose Range Number of Use Time (rads) Irradiations (hours) wood, soil, nanofibers, Sterilization blood, bone cement, 1.5x I 06 to 6.0x I 06 48 236 mouse diet, PLGA mi-crospheres, water silicon polymers, Material Evaluation polymers, crystals, met-3.0x l05 to l.8x l08 13 352 als Botanical Studies pollen, hops, cuttings, 2.0x 102 to 4.5x 104 36 0.30 potatoes, seeds Biological Studies biological sample 1.0x l04 to 3.0x l04 3 0.10 Totals 100 588 16-17 Annual Report
Facilities Table 111.2 Student Enrollment in Courses Which are Taught or P t* II t ht t th R d. t* C t ar 1a 1y aug a e a 1a ion en er Number of Students Course# CREDIT COURSE TITLE Summer Fall Winter Spring 2016 2016 2017 2017 NSE 114* 2 Introduction to Nuclear Engineering and Radiation 51 Health Physics NSE 115 2 Introduction to Nuclear Engineering and Radiation 44 Health Physics NSE 234 4 Nuclear and Radiation Physics I 73 NSE 235 4 Nuclear and Radiation Physics II 73 NSE236* 4 Nuclear Radiation Detection & lnstrumentation 63 NSE 311 4 Jntro to Thermal Fluids 10 29 14 NSE 312 4 Thermodynamics 21 17 NSE 319 3 Societal Aspects of Nuclear technology 96 NSE 331 4 Intro to Fluid Mechanics 3 23 14 NSE 332 4 Heat Transfer 1 2 20 NSE 233 3 Mathematical methods for NEIRHP 65 NSE/M P 401 /50 I /60 I 1-16 Research 14 27 28 30 NSE/MP 405/505/605 1-16 Reading and Conference I 9 9 I 1 NSE/MP 406/506/606 1-16 Projects I NSE/RHP/MP 1 Nuclear Engineering Seminar 43 98 77 407 /507 /607 NSE/MP 410/510/610 1-12 Internship 2 2 NSE 415/515 2 Nuclear Rules and Regulations 50 NSE 451 /551 4 Neutronic Analysis 67 NSE 452/552 4 Neutronic Analysis 65 NSE 455/555** 3 Reactor Operator Training 1 32 NSE 456/556** 3 Reactor Operator Training I I 4 NSE 457/557** Neuclear Reactor Lab 52 .) NSE 467/567 4 Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics 36 NSE 667 4 Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics 10 NSE 435/535 3 External Dosimetry & Radiation Shielding 52 NSE 565 3 Applied Thermal Hydraulics NSE 473/573 3 Nuclear Reactor Systems Analysis 26 16-17 Annual Report
Facilities Table 111.2 (continued) Student Enrollment in Courses Which are Taught or Partially Taught at the Radiation Center Course # CREDIT COURSE TITLE NSE 474/574 4 Nuclear System Design I NSE 475/575 4 Nuclear System Design TI NSE 479* 1-4 Individual Design Project NSE 48 1
- 4 Radiation Protection NSE 582*
4 Applied Radiation Safety NSE 483/583 4 Radiation Biology NSE 488/588* 3 Radioecology NSE 590 4 Internal Dosimetry NSE/MP 503/603* I Thesis NSE5 16* 4 Radiochemistry NSE 526 3 Numerical Methods for Engineering Analysis NSE/MP 53 1 3 Nuclear Physics for Engineers and Scientists NSE/MP 536* 3 Advanced Radiation Detection & Measurement NSE/RHP 537 3 Digital Spectrometer Design MP 541 3 Diagnostic Imaging Physics NSE 550 3 Nuclear Medicine NSE 553 3 Advanced Nuclear Reactor Physics MP563 4 Applied Medical Physics NSE 468/568 3 Nuclear Reactor Safety
- NSE/MP 599 Special Topics Course From Other OSU Departments CH 233*
5 General Chemistry CH 233H* 5 Honors General Chem istry CH 462* 3 Experimental Chemistry II Laboratory ENGR Ill
- 3 Engineering Orientation ENGR 212H*
3 Honors Engineering ST Special Topics OSTR used occasionally f or demonstration and/or experiments OSTR used heavily 16-17 Annual Report Summer 20 16 25 18 11 8 Number of Students Fall Winter Spring 2016 2017 2017 39 38 45 12 19 16 5 47 42 43 9 36 15 26 23 4 32 17 848 32 19 254 24 19
React: or Operating Statistics During the operating period between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017, the reactor produced 1438 MWH of thermal power during its 1579 critical hours. Experiments Performed During the current reporting period there were ten approved reactor experiments available for use in reactor-related pro-grams. They are: A-1 Normal TRI GA Operation (No Sample Irradiation). B-3 Irradiation of Materials in the Standard OSTR ir-radiation Facilities. B-11 Irradiation of Materials Involving Specific Quanti-ties of Uranium and Thorium in the Standard OSTR Irradiation Facilities. B-12 Exploratory Experiments. B-23 Studies Using TRI GA Thermal Column. B-29 Reactivity Worth of Fuel. B-31 TRIGA Flux Mapping. B-33 Irradiation of Combustible Liquids in LS. B-34 Irradiation of Enriched Uranium in the Neutron Radi-ography Facility. B-35 Irradiation of Fissile Materials in the Prompt Gamma Neutron Activation Analysis (PGNAA) Facility. Of these available experiments, three were used during the reporting period. Table IV.4 provides information related to the frequency of use and the general purpose of their use. Inactive Experiments Presently 33 experiments are in the inactive file. This con-sists of experiments which have been performed in the past and may be reactivated. Many of these experiments are now performed under the more general experiments listed in the previous section. The following list identifies these inactive experiments. A-2 Measurement of Reactor Power Level via Mn Activa-tion. A-3 Measurement of Cd Ratios for Mn, In, and Au in Rotating Rack. A-4 Neutron Flux Measurements in TRIGA. A-5 Copper Wire Irradiation. A-6 In-core irradiation ofLiF Crystals. A-7 Investigation ofTRIGA's Reactor Bath Water Tem-perature Coefficient and High Power Level Power Fluctuation. B-1 Activation Analysis of Stone Meteorites, Other Mete-orites, and Terrestrial Rocks. B-2 Measurements of Cd Ratios of Mn, ln, and Au in Thermal Column. B-4 B-5 B-6 Flux Mapping. In-core Irradiation of Foils for Neutron Spectral Mea-surements. Measurements of Neutron Spectra in External irradia-tion Facilities. B-7 Measurements of Gamma Doses in External Irradia-tion Facilities. B-8 Isotope Production. B-9 Neutron Radiography. B-10 Neutron Diffraction. B-13 This experiment number was changed to A-7. B-14 Detection of Chemically Bound Neutrons. B-15 This experiment number was changed to C-1. B-16 Production and Preparation of 18F. B-17 Fission Fragment Gamma Ray Angular Correlations. B-18 A Study of Delayed Status (n, y) Produced Nuclei.
B-19 Instrument Timing via Light Triggering. B-20 Sinusoidal Pile Oscillator. B-21 Beam Port #3 Neutron Radiography Facility. B-22 Water Flow Measurements Through TRlGA Core. B-24 General Neutron Radiography. B-25 Neutron Flux Monitors. B-26 Fast Neutron Spectrum Generator. B-27 Neutron Flux Determination Adjacent to the OSTR Core. B-28 Gamma Scan of Sodium (TED) Capsule. B-30 NAA of Jet, Diesel, and Furnace Fuels. B-32 Argon Production Facility C-1 Pu02 Transient Experiment. Unplanned Shutdowns There were 14 unplanned reactor shutdowns during the cur-rent reporting period. Table JY.5 details these events. Changes Pursuant to10 CFR 50-59 There was one safety evaluation performed in support of the reactor this year. It was: 17-01, Core Reconfiguration This allows for the reconfiguration of the reactor core to allow placement of a second CLICIT in position F20. Under this evaluation, the G-ring ICIT will be moved to position Fl2, two new fuel elements will be added to the core, and additional fuel will be moved to optimize the flux to various experimental facilities. There were 13 new screens performed in support of the reac-tor this year. They were: 16-04, Changes to OSTROP 8 Updated to allow power calibration in the most conservative core configuration that is in use, rather than requiring it to be performed in the NORMAL core. 16-17 Annual Report Reactor 16-05 Changes to OSTROPs 13 and 23 Added a crane inspection to the monthly checklist. Added daily and monthly checks to the crane procedure. 16-06 Changes to OSTROPs 4 and 5 Minor updates and clarifications to the procedures for operations and record keeping. 16-08 Reactor Bay Wall Penetrations Allows two holes to be drilled in the heat exchanger room walls to accommodate cables going to the emergency generator. 17-01 Changes to OSTROPs 6 and 14 Added an audit of operating procedures, to be performed by li-censed operators, to the quarterly checklist. Removed procedure audits from the ROC's responsibilities. 17-02 OSTROP 1 Changes Completely reformatted OSTROP I and re-titled it "Annunciator Response Procedures". 17-03 Reactor Bay Wall Penetrations Allows a hole to be drilled in the reactor bay east wall to accom-modate electrical and signal cables for an IT upgrade. 17-04 Transient Blowdown Valve Relocated the blowdown valve for the transient rod air supply. The new valve is several feet lower in the same piping run. 17-05 Modification of Fission Chamber Connectors and Preamp Allows connectors associated with the fission chamber to be replaced with better components. 17-06 Changes to OSTROP 2 Minor updates and clarifications to the startup checklist proce-dures. 17-07 Changes to OSTROP 20 Minor updates and clarifications to the Special Nuclear Material control and accounting procedures. 17-08 Changes to OSTROP 26 Minor updates and clarifications to background investigation procedures. 17-09 PGNAA Rabbit Controller Modification Allows the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) for the PGNAA pneumatic system to be replaced with a Field Program-mable Gate Array (FPGA).
Reactor Surveillance and Maintenance Non-Routine Maintenance September 2016 Replaced GM detector in rabbit system ARM. Replaced connectors on Safety Channel. Replaced readout and controls for the primary inlet tem-perature monitor. Replaced secondary pump seal and bearings. October 2016 Repaired a relay controlling the linear channel input on the console recorder. November 2016 Installed new piping to the liquid waste hold-up tank.. December 2016 Replaced both filters on the bulk shield tank purification system. Installed a new uncompensated ion chamber for the safety channel. January 2017 Replaced the UP button for the shim control rod. February 2017 Replaced the rate meter for ARM #5 and the detector for ARM #II. April 2017 Stopped a slight coolant leak on the emergency generator by tightening a clamp on a hose. May 2017 Installed a new blowdown valve for the transient rod air supply. 16-17 Annual Report
Reactor Table IV.1 Present OSTR Operating Statistics Operational Data For LEU Core Annual Values Cumulative Values (2016/2017) MWH of energy produced 1,438 11,576 MWD of energy produced 59.9 473.2 Grams 235U used 81 662 Number of fuel elements added to(+) or removed(-) from 0 90 the core Number of pulses 49 300 Hours reactor critical 1,579 12,492 Hours at full power (1 MW) 1,410 I 1,518 Number of startup and shutdown checks 245 1,931 Number of irradiation requests processed 232 2,047 Number of samples irradiated 1,143 14,491 16-17 Annual Report
Reactor Table IV.2 OSTR Use Time in Terms of Specific Use Categories OSTR Use Category Teaching (departmental and others) OS U research Off campus research Facility time Total Reactor Use Time Number of Users Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Total Multiple Use Time Annual Values (hours) 20 645 2,617 36 3,318 Table IV.3 OSTR Multiple Use Time Annual Values (hours) 438 333 172 54 23 l 0 1,021 Cumulative Values (hours) 13,713 20,316 50,083 7,354 91,466 Cumulative Values (hours) 10,449 5,536 2,924 1,043 279 71 3 20,305 16-17 Annual Report
Reactor Table IV.4 Use of OSTR Reactor Experiments Experiment Research Teaching Facility Use Total Number A-1 2 7 6 15 B-3 202 9 5 216 B-35 1 0 0 1 Total 205 16 11 232 Table IV.5 Unplanned Reactor Shutdowns and Scrams Type of Event Number of Cause of Event Occurrences Safety channel high power 6 Operator error while stabilizing at full power Safety channel high power 3 Failure of channel components Safety channel hjgh power and 3 Failure of channel components high voltage Period scram 1 Verifying period channel in OPERATE position Manual scram 1 High Activity alarm on ARM #11 (determined to be false alarm) 16-17 Annual Report
Figure IV.1 Monthly Surveillance and Maintenance (Sample Form) OSTROP 13, Rev. LEU-6 Surveillance & Maintenance for the Month of in the year of 20 __ SURVEILLANCE & MAINTENANCE TARGET DATE DATE REMARKS LIMITS AS FOUND NOTTO BE [SHADE INDICATES LICENSE REQUfREMENT] DATE EXCEEDED
- COMPLETED INITIALS MAXIMUM HIGH:
INCHES REACTOR TANK HIGH AND LOW WATER I LEVEL ALARMS MOVEMENT LOW: rNCHES +/-3 INCHES ANN: 2 BULK WATER TEMPERATURE ALARM CHECK FUNCTIONAL Tested @ __ 3A CHANNEL TEST OF STACK CAM GAS CHANNEL 8.5xl0"+/- Ann.? cpm Ann. 8500 cpm 3B CHANNEL TEST OF STACK CAM PARTICULATE 8.5xl0'+/- Ann.? Ann. CHANNEL 8500 cpm cpm 3C CHANNEL TEST OF REACTOR TOP CAM 8.5xl0'+/- Ann.? Ann. PARTICULATE CHANNEL 8500 cpm cpm 4 MEASUREMENT OF REACTOR PRIMARY <5 µmho\\cm WATER CONDUCTlVITY 5 PRIMARY WATER pH MEASUREMENT MIN:5 NIA MAX: 9 6 BULK SHIELD TANK WATER pH MIN: 5 NIA MEASUREMENT MAX: 9 7 CHANGE LAZY SUSAN FILTER FILTER NIA CHANGED 8 REACTOR TOP CAM OIL LEVEL CHECK OSTROP 13.8 NEED OIL? NIA 9 STACK CAM OIL LEVEL CHECK OSTROP 13.9 NEED OIL? NIA JO PRIMARY PUMP BEARING OIL LEVEL CHECK OSTROP 13.10 NEED OIL? NIA 11 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR CHECKS > 50% I Oil ok? NIA Total hours 12 RABBlT SYSTEM RUN TIME Total hours/Hours NIA on current brushes 13 OIL TRANSIENT ROD BRONZE BEARING WD40 NIA 14 CRANE INSPECTION Hooks I Hoist NIA Rope 15 WATER MONITOR CHECK RCHPP 8 App. F.4 NIA
- Date not to be exceeded is only applicable to shaded items. It is equal to the time completed last month plus six weeks.
- ti ro
-0 0 .-+ Figure IV.2 Quarterly Surveillance and Maintenance (Sample Form) OSTROP 14, Rev. LEU-5 Surveillance & Maintenance for the 1st I 2 11d I 3rd I 4th Quarter of 20 __ SURVEILLANCE & MAINTENANCE LIM ITS AS FOUND TARGET DATE NOTTO DATE REMARKS& (SHADE INDICATES LICENSE REQU IREMENT] DATE BE EXCEEDED* COMPLETED INITIALS I REACTOR OPERATION COMMITTEE (ROC) AUDIT QUARTERLY 2 INTERNAL AUDIT OF OSTROPS QUARTERLY 3 QUARTERLY ROC MEETING QUARTERLY 4 ERP INSPECTIONS QUARTERLY 5 ROTATING RACK CHECK FOR UN KNOWN SAMPLES EMPTY 6 WATER MONITOR ALARM CHECK FUNCTIONAL 7A CHECK FILTER TAPE SPEED ON STACK MONITOR l"/HR+/- 0.2 78 CHECK FILTER TAPE SPEED ON CAM MONITOR !"/HR+/- 0.2 8 INCORPORATE 50.59 & ROCAS INTO DOCUMENTATION QUARTERLY 9 EMERGENCY CALL LIST QUARTERLY ARM SYSTEM ALARM CHECKS ARM I 2 3S 3E 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 AUD 10 FUNCTIONAL LIG HT PANEL ANN
- Date not to be exceeded is only applicable to shaded items. It is equal to the time completed last quarter plus four months.
Figure IV.2 (continued) Quarterly Surveillance and Maintenance (Sample Form) OSTROP 14, Rev. LEU-5 Surveillance & Maintenance for the 1st I 2nct I 3 rct I 4th Quarter of 2 0 SURVEILLANCE & MAINTENANCE LIMITS AS FOUND DATE REMARKS& [SHADE INDICATES LICENSE REQUIREMENT) COMPLETED INITIALS OPERATOR NAME a) TOTAL OPERATION TIME b) DATE OF OPERATING EXERCISE REMARKS & INITIALS a) ~4 hours: at console (RO), at console or as Rx. Sup. (SRO) 11 b) Date Completed Operating Exercise
en I...... -....J )> c: CJ
- 0 rt>
"O 0 ~ Figure IV.3 Semi-Annual Surveillance and Maintenance (Sample Form) OSTROP 15, Rev. LEU-3 Surveillance & Maintenance for the 1 st I 2nd Half of 20 SURVEILLANCE & MAINTENANCE TARGET DATE NOT DATE REMARKS [SHADE INDICATES LICENSE REQUIREMENT] LIMITS AS FOUND DATE TOBE COMPLETED EXCEEDED* IN ITIALS NO WITHDRAW NEUTRON SOURCE COUNT RATE INTERLOCK ?:5 cps TRANSIENT ROD AIR INTERLOCK NO PULSE CHANNEL TESTS PULSE MODE ROD MOVEMENT INTERLOCK NO MOVEMENT I OF REACTOR INTERLOCKS PULSE INTERLOCK ON RANGE SWlTCH NO PULSE MAXIMUM PULSE REACTIVITY INSERTION LIMIT
- $2.25 TWO ROD WITHDRAWAL PRHOHJBIT I ONLY PULSE PROHIBIT ABOVE I kW
?:I kW 2 SAFETY PERIOD SCRAM ?:3 sec CIRCUIT TEST PREVIOUS PULSE DATA FOR COMPARION '.020% PULSE# -- PULSE# 3 TEST PULSE CHANGE MW MW oc oc 4 CLEANfNG & LUBRICATION OF TRANSIENT ROD CARRI ER INTERNAL BARREL 5 LUBRICATION OF BALL-NUT DRIVE ON TRANSIENT ROD CARRIER 6 LUBRICATION OF THE ROTATING RACK BEARI NGS WD-40 7 CONSOLE CHECK LI ST OSTROP IS.V II 8 INVERTER MAINTENANCE See User Manual 9 STANDARD CONTROL ROD MOTOR CHECKS L0-17 Bodine Oil
- Date not to be exceeded is only applicable to shaded items. It is equal to the date last time plus 7 1/2 months.
Figure IV.3 (continued) Semi-Annual Surveillance and Maintenance (Sample Form) OSTROP 15, Rev. LEU-3 Surveillance & Maintenance for the 1 st I 2 nd Half of 20 SURVEILLANCE & MAJNTENANCE TARGET DATE NOT DATE REMARKS& [SHADE INDICATES LICENSE REQU IREMENT] LIMITS AS FOUND DATE TOBE COMPLETED IN ITIALS EXCEEDED* (SAFETY CHANNEL) 10 ION CHAMBER RESISTANCE M EASUREMENTS WITH MEGGAR INDUCED VOLTAGE (%POWER CHANNEL) @ IOO Y. I = AMPS FISSION CHAMBER RESISTANCE @ 900 Y. I = AMPS NONE I I 800 v (Info Only) CALCULATION 61 = AMPS R= - L'. I R = n HIGH 12 FUNCTIONAL CHECK OF HOLDUP TANK WATER LEVEL ALARMS OSTROP 15.Xll FULL BRUSH INSPECTION INSPECTION OF THE PNEUMATlC TRANSFER 13 SYSTEM Observed SAMPLE INSERTION AND WITHDRAWAL insertion/withdrawal TIME CHECK time
- Date not to be exceeded is only applicable to shaded items. It is equal to the date last time plus 7 1/2 months.
Figure IV.4 Annual Surveillance and Maintenance (Sample Form) OSTROP 16, Rev. LEU-2 Annual Surveillance and Maintenance for 20 SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE AS TARGET DATE NOT DATE REMARKS [SHADE INDICATES LICENSE REQUIREMENT] LIMITS FOUND DATE TOBE COMPLETED EXCEEDED* INITIALS 1 BIENNIAL INSPECTION OF FFCRS OSTROP 12.0 CONTROL RODS: TRANS 2 STANDARD CONTROL ROD DRIVE INSPECTON OSTROP 16.2 NORMAL 3 CONTROL ROD CALfBRATION: CLICIT OSTROP9.0 !CIT/DUMMY TRANS SAFE SHIM REG CONTROL ROD SCRAM ~2 sec 4 WITHDRAWAL INSERTION & W/D <50 sec SCRAM TIMES LNSERT ~50 sec FUEL ELEMENT INSPECTION FOR SELECTED 2: LU% t t:'s inspected. 5 ELEMENTS No damage rl~,~ ;,
- ... or well 6
REACTOR POWER CALIBRATION OSTROP8 7 FUEL ELEMENT TEMPERATURE CHANNEL Per Checklist CALfBRATION 8 CALIBRATION OF REACTOR TANK WATER TEMP OSTROP 16.8 TEMPERATURE METERS CONTINUOUS Particulate Monitor 9 AlRMONITOR RCHPPl8 CALIBRATION Gas Monitor IO CAM OIL/GREASE MAINTENANCE STACK MONITOR Particulate Monitor RCHPP 11 CALIBRATION 18 &26 Gas Monitor 12 STACK MONITOR OI L/GREASE MAINTENANCE I3 AREA RADIATION MONITOR CALIBRATION RCHPP18
- Date not be exceeded is only applicable to shaded items. It is equal to the date completed last year plus 15 months.
For biennial license requirements it is equal to the date completed last time plus 2 l /2 years.
Figure IV.4 (continued) Annual Surveillance and Maintenance (Sample Form) OSTROP 16, Rev. LEU-2 Annual Surveillance and Maintenance for 20 SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE AS TARGET DATE NOT DATE REMARKS LIMITS TOBE [SHADE INDICATES LICENSE REQUIREMENT] FOUND DATE EXCEEDED* COMPLETED & INITIALS NORMAL$ - 14 CORE EXCESS S$7.55 !CIT$ - CLICIT$ DAMPERS 18TFL00R 15 !REACTOR BAY VENTILATION SYSTEM SHUTDOWN TEST CLOSE IN <5 SECONDS 4rnFLOOR 16 IDECOMMISSIONING COST UPDATE NIA NIA AUGUST 17 lsNM PHYSICAL INVENTORY NIA NIA OCTOBER 18 MATERIAL BALANCE REPORTS NIA NIA NOVEMBER CFD TRAINING GOOD SAM TRAINTNG ERP REVIEW ERP DRILL CPR CERT FOR: CPR CERT FOR: EMERGENCY 19
RESPONSE
FIRST AID CERT FOR: PLAN FIRST AID CERT FOR: EVACUATION DRILL AUTOEVACANNOUNCEMENTTEST ERP EQUIPMENT INVENTORY BIENNIAL SUPPORT AGREEMENTS PSPREVIEW PHYSICAL PSPDRILL 20 SECURITY OSP/DPS TRAINING PLAN LOCK/SAFE COMBO CHANGES AUTHORIZATION LIST UPDATE
- Date not be exceeded is only applicable to shaded items. It is equal to the date completed last year plus 15 months.
For biennial license requirements, it is equal to the date completed last time plus 2 112 years.
CJ) I...... -...J )>
- l
- l c QJ
- 0 ro
"'C 0 Figure IV.4 (continued) Annual Surveillance and Maintenance (Sample Form) OSTROP 16, Rev. LEU-2 Annual Surveillance and Maintenance for 20 AS TARGET DA I t NU J DATE REMARKS SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE LIMITS TOBE [SHADE INDICATES LICENSE REQUIREMENT] FOUND DATE FXC'.FFn Fn
- COMPLETED
& fNITIALS 21 ANNUAL REPORT NOVI OCT ! NOV I 22 KEY INVENTORY ANNUAL 23 REACTOR TANK AND CORE COM PONENT NO WH ITE SPOTS fN SPECTION 24 EMERGENCY LIGHT LOAD TEST RCHPP 18.0 25 NEUTRON RADIOGRAPHY FACILTIY INTERLOCKS 26 PGNAA FACILITY INTERLOCKS ANNUAL REQUALIFICATJON BI ENN IAL MEDICAL EVERY 6 YEARS LICENSE REACTOR OPERATOR LICENSE CONDITIONS WRITTEN EXPIRATION OPERATING TEST APPLICATION EXAM DATE DATE DATE DUE COMPLETED OPERATOR NAME DATE DATE DATE DUE DATE DUE PASSED DATE DUE PASSED DATE MAILED 27
- Date not be exceeded is only applicable to shaded items. It is equal to the date completed last year plus 15 months.
For biennial license requirements, it is equal to the date completed last time plus 2 1/2 years.
Radiation Protection Introduction The purpose of the radiation protection program is to ensure the safe use of radiation and radioactive material in the Cen-ter's teaching, research, and service activities, and in a similar manner to the fulfillment of all regulatory requirements of the State of Oregon, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and other regulatory agencies. The comprehensive nature of the program is shown in Table Y. l, which lists the program 's major radiation protection requirements and the performance frequency for each item. The radiation protection program is implemented by a staff consisting of a Senior Health Physicist, a Health Physicist, and several part-time Health Physics Monitors (see Part II). Assistance is also provided by the reactor operations group, the neutron activation analysis group, the Scientific Instrument Technician, and the Radiation Center Director. The data contained in the following sections hav nb je been prepared to comply with the current requirements of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Facility License No. R-106 (Docket No. 50-243) and the Technical Specifications con-tained in that license. The material has also been prepared in compliance with Oregon Department of Energy Rule No. 345-30-0 I 0, which requires an annual report of environmental effects due to research reactor operations. Within the scope of Oregon State University's radiation pro-tection program, it is standard operating policy to maintain all releases of radioactivity to the unrestricted environment and all exposures to radiation and radioactive materials at levels which are consistently "as low as reasonably achievable" (A LARA). Environmental Releases The annual reporting requirements in the OSTR Technical Specifications state that the licensee (OSU) shall include "a summary of the nature and amount of radioactive effluents released or discharged to the environs beyond the effective control of the licensee, as measured at, or prior to, the point of such release or discharge." The liquid and gaseous effluents released, and the solid waste generated and transferred are discussed briefly below. Data regarding these effluents are also Liquid Effluents Released Liquid Effluents Oregon State University has implemented a policy to reduce the volume of radioactive liquid effluents to an absolute mini-mum. For example, water used during the ion exchanger resin change is now recycled as reactor makeup water. Waste water from Radiation Center laboratories and the OSTR is collected at a holdup tank prior to release to the sanitary sewer. Liquid effluent are analyzed for radioactivity content at the time it is released to the collection point. For this reporting period, the Radiation Center and reactor made seven liquid effluent releases to the sanitary sewer. All Radiation Center and reactor facility liquid effluent data pertaining to this release are con-tained in Table Y.2. Liquid Waste Generated and Transferred Liquid waste generated from glassware and laboratory experi-ments is transferred by the campus Radiation Safety Office to its waste processing facility. The annual summary of liquid waste generated and transferred is contained in Table Y.3. summarized in detail in the designated tables. 16-17 Annual Report
Radiation Protection Airborne Effluents Released Airborne effluents are discussed in terms of the gaseous com-ponent and the particulate component. Gaseous Ejjluents Gaseous effluents from the reactor facility are monitored by the reactor stack effluent monitor. Monitoring is continuous, i.e., prior to, during, and after reactor operations. It is normal for the reactor facility stack effluent monitor to begin opera-tion as one of the first systems in the morning and to cease operation as one of the last systems at the end of the day. All gaseous effluent data for this reporting period are summarized in Table V.4. Particulate effluents from the reactor facility are also moni-tored by the reactor facility stack effluent monitor. Particulate Ejjluents Evaluation of the detectable particulate radioactivity in the stack effluent confirmed its origin as naturally-occurring radon daughter products, within a range of approximately 3x I 0-11 µCi/ml to I x 10-9 µCi/ml. This particulate radioactivity is predominantly 2 14Pb and 2 14Bi, which is not associated with reactor operations. There was no release of particulate effluents with a half 1 ife greater than eight days and therefore the reporting of the aver-age concentration of radioactive particulates with half lives greater than eight days is not applicable. Solid Waste Released Data for the radioactive material in the solid waste generated and transferred during this reporting period are summarized in Table V.5 for both the reactor facility and the Radiation Center. Solid radioactive waste is routinely transferred to OSU Radia-tion Safety. Until this waste is disposed of by the Radiation Safety Office, it is held along with other campus radioactive waste on the University's State of Oregon radioactive materi-als license. Solid radioactive waste is disposed of by OSU Radiation Safety by transfer to the University's radioactive waste dis-posal vendor. Personnel Dose The OSTR annual reporting requirements specify that the licensee shall present a summary of the radiation exposure received by facility personnel and visitors. The summary in-cludes all Radiation Center personnel who may have received exposure to radiation. These personnel have been categorized into six groups: facility operating personnel, key facility research personnel, facilities services maintenance personnel, students in laboratory classes, police and security personnel, and visitors. Facility operating personnel include the reactor operations and health physics staff. The dosimeters used to monitor these in-dividuals include quarterly TLD badges, quarterly track-etch/ albedo neutron dosimeters, monthly TLD (finger) extremity dosimeters, pocket ion chambers, electronic dosimetry. Key facility research personnel consist of Radiation Center staff, faculty, and graduate students who perform research using the reactor, reactor-activated materials, or using other research facilities present at the Center. The individual dosim-etry requirements for these personnel will vary with the type of research being conducted, but will generally include a quar-terly TLD film badge and TLD (finger) extremity dosimeters. If the possibility of neutron exposure exists, researchers are also monitored with a track-etch/ albedo neutron dosimeter. Facilities Services maintenance personnel are normally issued a gamma sensitive electronic dosimeter as their basic monitor-ing device. Students attending laboratory classes are issued quarterly XJ3(y) TLD badges, TLD (finger) extremity dosimeters, and track-etch/albedo or other neutron dosimeters, as appropriate. Students or smal 1 groups of students who attend a one-time lab demonstration and do not handle radioactive materials are usually issued a gamma sensitive electronic dosimeter. These results are not included with the laboratory class students. OSU police and security personnel are issued a quarterly XJ3(y) TLD badge to be used during their patrols of the Radia-tion Center and reactor facility. Visitors, depending on the locations visited, may be issued gamma sensitive electronic dosimeters. OSU Radiation Center policy does not normally allow people in the visitor category to become actively involved in the use or handling of radioac-tive materials. 16-17 Annual Report
Radiation Protection An annual summary of the radiation doses received by each of the above six groups is shown in Table V6. There were no personnel radiation exposures in excess of the limits in 10 CFR 20 or State of Oregon regulations during the reporting period. Facility Survey Data The OSTR Technical Specifications require an annual sum-mary of the radiation levels and levels of contamination observed during routine surveys performed at the faci lity. The Center's comprehensive area radiation monitoring program encompasses the Radiation Center as well as the OSTR, and therefore monitoring results for both facilities are reported. Area Radiation Dosimeters Area monitoring dosimeters capable of integrating the radia-tion dose are located at strategic positions throughout the reactor facility and Radiation Center. All of these dosimeters contain at least a standard personnel-type beta-gamma film or TLD pack. ln addition, for key locations in the reactor facility and for certain Radiation Center laboratories a CR-39 plas-tic track-etch neutron detector has also been included in the monitoring package. The total dose equivalent recorded on the various reactor facil-ity dosimeters is listed in Table V 7 and the total dose equiva-lent recorded on the Radiation Center area dosimeters is listed in Table V8. Generally, the characters fo llowing the Monitor Radiation Center (MRC) designator show the room number or location. Routine Radiation and Contamination Surveys The Center's program for routine radiation and contamination surveys consists of daily, weekly, and monthly measurements throughout the TRJGA reactor facility and Radiation Center. The frequency of these surveys is based on the nature of the radiation work being carried out at a particular location or on other factors which indicate that surveillance over a specific area at a defined frequency is desirable. The primary purpose of the routine radiation and contamina-tion survey program is to assure regularly scheduled surveil-lance over selected work areas in the reactor facility and in the Radiation Center, in order to provide current and characteristic data on the status of radiological conditions. A second objec-tive of the program is to assure frequent on-the-spot personal observations (along with recorded data), which wi ll provide advance warning of needed corrections and thereby help to ensure the safe use and handling of radiation sources and radioactive materials. A third objective, which is really derived from successful execution of the first two objectives, is to gath-er and document information which will help to ensure that all phases of the operational and radiation protection programs are meeting the goal of keeping radiation doses to personnel and releases of radioactivity to the environment "as low as reason-ably achievable" (ALARA). The annual summary of radiation and contamination levels measured during routine facility surveys for the applicable reporting period is given in Table V9. Environmental Survey Data The annual reporting requirements of the OSTR Technical Specifications include "an annual summary of environmental surveys performed outside the faci lity." Gamma Radiation Monitoring On-site Monitoring Monitors used in the on-site gamma environmental radiation monitoring program at the Radiation Center consist of the re-actor facility stack effluent monitor described in Section V and nine environmental monitoring stations. During this reporting period, each fence environmental station utilized an LiF TLD monitoring packet supplied and processed by Mirion Technologies, Inc., lrvine, California. Each packet contained three LiF TLDs and was exchanged quarterly for a total of I 08 samples during the reporting period (9 stations x 3 TLDs per station x 4 quarters). The total number ofTLD samples for the reporting period was I 08. A summary of the TLD data is also shown in Table VI 0. From Table V 1 O it is concluded that the doses recorded by the dosimeters on the TRIGA faci lity fence can be attributed to natural back-ground radiation, which is about 110 mrem per year for Oregon (Refs. I, 2). Off-site Monitoring The off-site gamma environmental radiation monitoring program consists of twenty monitoring stations surrounding the Radiation Center (see Figure V. I) and six stations located within a 5 mile radius of the Radiation Center. 16-17 Annual Report
- ~~~~::::::::::::::::1111......... lllll:::::::::::jRiiad~1~*a~t~io:n~P~ro:t:e~c:ti~o:n~
Each monitoring station is located about four feet above the ground (MRCTE 21 and MRCTE 22 are mounted on the roof of the EPA Laboratory and National Forage Seed Laboratory, respectively). These monitors are exchanged and processed quarterly, and the total number ofTLD samples during the current one-year reporting period was 240 (20 stations x 3 chips per station per quarter x 4 quarters per year). The total number ofTLD samples for the reporting period was 240. A summary ofTLD data for the off-site monitoring stations is given in Table V 11. After a review of the data in Table V 11, it is concluded that, like the dosimeters on the TRJGA facility fence, all of the doses recorded by the off-site dosimeters can be attributed to natural background radiation, which is about 11 O mrem per year for Oregon (Refs. 1, 2). Soil, Water, and Vegetation Surveys The soil, water, and vegetation monitoring program consists of the collection and analysis of a limited number of samples in each category on a annual basis. The program monitors highly unlikely radioactive material releases from either the TRIG A reactor facility or the OSU Radiation Center, and also helps indicate the general trend of the radioactivity concentration in each of the various substances sampled. See Figure VI for the locations of the sampling stations for grass (G), soil (S), water (W) and rainwater (RW) samples. Most locations are within a 1000 foot radius of the reactor facility and the Radiation Center. ln general, samples are collected over a local area having a radius of about ten feet at the posi-tions indicated in Figure VI. There are a total of22 sampling locations: four soil loca-tions, four water locations (when water is available), and fourteen vegetation locations. The annual concentration of total net beta radioactivity (mi-nus tritium) for samples collected at each environmental so il, water, and vegetation sampling location (sampling station) is listed in Table Y.12. Calculation of the total net beta disinte-gration rate incorporates subtraction of only the counting sys-tem back-ground from the gross beta counting rate, followed by application of an appropriate counting system efficiency. The annual concentrations were calculated using sample results which exceeded the lower limit of detection (LLD), except that sample results which were less than or equal to the LLD were averaged in at the corresponding LLD con-centration. Table V 13 gives the concentration and the range of values for each sample category for the current reporting period. As used in this report, the LLD has been defined as the amount or concentration of radioactive material (in terms of µCi per unit volume or unit mass) in a representative sample, which has a 95% probability of being detected. Identification of specific radionuclides is not routinely carried out as part of this monitoring program, but would be conduct-ed if unusual radioactivity levels above natural background were detected. However, from Table V 12 it can be seen that the levels of radioactivity detected were consistent with naturally occurring radioactivity and comparable to values reported in previous years. Radioactive Materials Shipments A summary of the radioactive material shipments originating from the TRJGA reactor facility, NRC license R-106, is shown in Table Y. 14. A similar summary for shipments originating from the Radiation Center's State of Oregon radioactive ma-terials I icense ORE 90005 is shown in Table V 15. A summary of radioactive material shipments exported under Nuclear Regulatory Commission general license I 0 CFR 110.23 is shown in Table V 16. References I. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Estimates of Ionizing Radiation Doses in the United States, 1960-2000," ORP/CSD 72-1, Office of Radiation Programs, Rockville, Maryland (1972).
- 2.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Radiologi-cal Quality of the Environment in the United States, 1977," EPA 52011-77-009, Office of Radiation Pro-grams; Washington, D.C. 20460 (1977). 16-17 Annual Report
Radiation Protection Table V.1 Radiation Protection Program Requirements and Frequencies Frequency Radiation Protection Requirement Daily/Weekly/Monthly Perfonn Routing area radiation/contamination monitoring Collect and analyze TRIGA primary, secondary, and make-up water. Exchange personnel dosimeters and inside area monitoring dosimeters, and review Monthly exposure reports. Inspect laboratories. Calculate previous month's gaseous effluent discharge. Process and record solid waste and liquid effluent discharges. Prepare and record radioactive material shipments. Survey and record incoming radioactive materials receipts. As Required Perfonn and record special radiation surveys. Perform thyroid and urinalysis bioassays. Conduct orientations and training. Issue radiation work pennits and provide health physics coverage for maintenance operations. Prepare, exchange and process environmental TLD packs. Conduct orientations for classes using radioactive materials. Quarterly Collect and analyze samples from reactor stack effluent line. Exchange personnel dosimeters and inside area monitoring dosimeters, and review exposure reports. Semi-Annual Leak test and inventory sealed sources. Conduct floor survey of corridors and reactor bay. Calibrate portable radiation monitoring instruments and personnel pocket ion chambers. Calibrate reactor stack effluent monitor, continuous air monitors, remote area radiation monitors, and air samplers. Measure face air velocity in laboratory hoods and exchange dust-stop filters and HEPA Annual fi lters as necessary. Inventory and inspect Radiation Center emergency equipment. Conduct facility radiation survey of the 60Co irradiators. Conduct personnel dosimeter training. Update decommissioning logbook. Collect and process environmental soil, water, and vegetation samples. 16-17 Annual Report
O'l I...... -...J )>
- l
- l c:
Q)
- 0 ro
"'O 0 ~ TableV.2 Monthly Summary of Liquid Effluent Release to the Sanitary Sewer(l> Specific Activity for Total Quantity of Average Percent of Applicable Total Each Detectable Radio-Date of Quantity of Detectable nuclide in Each Detectable Concentration Monthly Average Discharge Radioactivity Radionuclide in the Waste, Where the Radionuclide Of Released Concentration for (Month and Released the Waste Release Concentration Released in the Radioactive Material Released Radioactive Year) (Curies) Was> 1 x 10-7 Waste at the Point of Release Material (Curies) (µCi ml-I) (%)<2l (µCi ml*1) Oct 2016 9.44xl0*7 Co-60 Co-60, l.52xJ0*7 Co-60, 9.44x to*1 Co-60, 1.31 x1 0-9 Co-60, 0.004 H-3, 2.15x10*5 H-3, 4.78xl0*8 H-3, 4.80xl 0*4 Jan 2017 2.19xl0*5 H-3, Co-60 H-3 4.74xJ0*6 Co-60, 3.96xl 0*1 Co-60, 8.80xl0*10 Co-60, 1.76xl0*5 Annual Total H-3, 2.15x J0*5 for Radiation 2.28xl0*5 H-3, Co-60 Co-60, H-3, 4.90xl0*6 5.00xl0*8 0.004 Center Co-60, 1.34xl 0*6 ( l) The OSU operational policy is to subtract only detector background from the water analysis data and not background radioactivity in the Corvallis city water. (2) Based on values listed in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B to 20.1001 - 10.2401, Table 3, which are applicable to sewer disposal. Total Volume of Liquid Effluent Released lncluding Diluent (gal) 190,732 118,877 309,609
Radiation Protection Table V.3 Annual Summary of Liquid Waste Generated and Transferred Volume of Liquid Detectable Total Quantity of Dates of Waste Pickup Origin of Liquid (!) Rad ion ucl ides Radioactivity in the for Transfer to the Waste Waste Packaged Waste Processing (gallons) in the Waste Waste (Curies) Facility Radiation Center
- 5.0 Pu-239 3.0x J0-7 211117 Laboratories TOTAL 5.0 See above 3.0xt0*7 (I)
OSTR and Radiation Center liquid waste is picked up by the Radiation Safety Office for transfer to its waste processing facility for final packaging. 16-17 Annual Report
- ====.. -..
Radiation Protection Table V.4 M thl TRIGA R on 1y t G eac or aseous w t o* h as e ISC argesan dA na 1ys1s Estimated Fraction of the Technical Total Total Atmospheric Diluted Specification Month Estimated Estimated Quantity of Concentration of Annual Average Activity Argon-41 Argon-41 at Point of Released (Curies) Released(!> (Curies) Release Argon-41 (µCi/cc) Concentration Limit(%) July 1.24 1.24 9.72xl0*8 2.43 August 1.33 1.33 1.04xJ0*7 2.60 September 1.08 1.08 8.69xl0*8 2.17 October 1.41 1.41 1.1 OxJ0*7 2.75 November 1.44 1.44 l.16x10*7 2.90 December 1.62 1.62 l.27xl 0-1 3.17 January 1.59 1.59 1.24xl 0-1 3.10 February 1.67 1.67 1.45xl 0-1 3.63 March 1.74 1.74 I.36xl 0-1 3.39 April 1.63 1.63 1.32x J0*7 3.30 May 1.65 1.65 1.29xJ0*7 3.23 June 1.67 1.67 1.35x J0*7 3.37 TOTAL ('16-'17) 18.07 18.07 l.20x l 0-1<2> 3.00 ( I) Routine gamma spectroscopy analysis of the gaseous radioactivity in the OSTR stack discharge indicated the only detectable radionuclide was argon-41. (2) Annual Average. 16-17 Annual Report
Radiation Protectio Table V.5 A nnua IS ummaryo ts rdw t G 01 as e t d enera e an dT f rans erre d Volume of Detectable Total Quantity Dates of Waste Pickup Origin of Solid Waste Radionuclides of Radioactivity for Transfer to the OSU Solid Waste Packaged<1> in the Waste in Solid Waste Waste Processing (Cubic Feet) (Curies) Facility TRIG A Co-60, Zn-65, Sc-46, Fe-59, Co-58, Reactor 8 As-74, Mn-54, Sb-124, 4.67xl0-6 211117 Facility Se-75, Hf-181, Ta-182 Radiation Pu-239, Am-243, Eu-152, Eu-154, Center JO Cs-134, Ra-226, Th-228, H-3, 7.70x J0*5 2/1/17 Laboratories Cf-252 TOTAL 18 See Above
- 8. l 7xl o-s (I) OSTR and Radiation Center laboratory waste is picked up by OSU Radiation Safety for transfer to its waste processing facility for final packaging_
16-17 Annual Report
Radiation Protection Table V.6 Annual Summary of Personnel Radiation Doses Received Average Annual Greatest Individual Total Person-mrem Dosec1> Dose(I) for the Groupo> Personnel Group Whole Body Extremities Whole Body Extremities Whole Body Extremities (mrem) (mrem) (mrem) (mrem) (mrem) (mrem) Facility Operating 109 410 220 1,197 984 3,688 Personnel Key Facility Research ND 3 ND 25 ND 25 Personnel Facilities Services Maintenance ND NIA N D NIA ND NIA Personnel Laboratory Class 3 15 49 86 300 416 Students Campus Police and 1 NIA 12 NIA 46 NIA Security Personnel Visitors <1 NIA 6 NIA 11 3 NIA ( I) "NIA" indicates that there was no extremity monitoring conducted or required for the group. 16-17 Annual Report
Radiation Protecti Table V.7 Total Dose Equivalent Recorded on Area Dosimeters Located Within the TRIGA Reactor Facility Total Dose Equivalent<1x2> Monitor TRI GA Reactor Recorded LD. Facility Location Xf3(y) Neutron (See Figure V.l) (mrem) (mrem) MRCTNE 0104: North Badge East Wall 246 ND MRCTSE D104: South Badge East Wall 156 ND MRCTSW Dl04: South Badge West Wall 530 ND MRCTNW D104: North Badge West Wall 441 ND MRCTWN D104: West Badge North Wall 617 ND MRCTEN D104: East Badge North Wall 303 ND MRCTES D104: East Badge South Wall 1,741 ND MRCTWS Dl04: West Badge South Wall 589 ND MRCTTOP Dl04: Reactor Top Badge 1,304 ND MRCTHXS D104A: South Badge HX Room 800 ND MRCTHXW D104A: West Badge HX Room 270 ND MRCD-302 D302: Reactor Control Room 504 ND MRCD-302A D302A: Reactor Supervisor's Office 114 ND MRCBPl Dl04: Beam Port Number l 544 ND MRCBP2 Dl04: Beam Port Number 2 230 ND MRCBP3 D104: Beam Port Number 3 1,087 ND MRCBP4 D104: Beam Port Number 4 1, 118 ND (I) The total recorded dose equivalent values do not include natural background contribution and reflect the summation of the results of four quarterly beta-gamma dosimeters or four quarterly fast neutron dosimeters for each location. A total dose equivalent of ND" in-dicates that each of the dosimeters during the reporting period was less than the vendor's gamma dose reporting threshold of 10 mrem or that each of the fast neutron dosimeters was less than the vendor's threshold of 10 mrem. "NIA" indicates that there was no neutron monitor at that location. (2) These dose equivalent values do not represent radiation exposure through an exterior wall directly into an unrestricted area. 16-17 Annual Report
- ~~~~:::::::::::::::::1111........... lll::::::::::JR~a~d~ia;t~1-.o~n:~p~~~~:t:~::t~io~n~
Monitor 1.D. MRCAIOO MR CB RF MRCAl20 MRCAl20A MRCAl26 MRCC0-60 MRCAl30 MRCAl32 MRCAl38 MRCAl46 MRC8100 MRCBI 14 MRC8119-1 MRC81 19-2 MRC8119A MRCB120 MRCBl22-2 MRC8122-3 MRC8124-1 MRC8124-2 MRC8124-6 MRCBl28 MRC8136 MRCCIOO Table V.8 Total Dose Equivalent Recorded on Area Dosimeters Located Within the Radiation Center Total Recorded Radiation Center Dose Equivalent<1> Facility Location Xf3(y) Neutron (See Figure V. I) (mrem) (mrem) AIOO: Receptionist's Office 0 ND A I 02H: Front Personnel Dosimetry Storage Rack 0 ND Al20: Stock Room 0 ND Al20A: NAA Temporary Storage 116 ND Al26: Radioisotope Research Laboratory 296 ND Al28: 60Co lrradiator Room 1,239 ND Al30: Shielded Exposure Room 0 ND Al32: TLD Equipment Room 0 ND Al38: Health Physics Laboratory 0 ND Al46: Gamma Analyzer Room (Storage Cave) 147 ND BIOO: Gamma Analyzer Room (Storage Cave) 167 ND 8114: Lab (226Ra Storage Facility) 579 ND 8119: Source Storage Room 42 ND 8119: Source Storage Room 813 ND Bll9A: Sealed Source Storage Room 2,982 10 8120: Instrument Calibration Facility 226 ND 8122: Radioisotope Hood 281 ND 8122: Radioisotope Research Laboratory 34 ND Bl24: Radioisotope Research Laboratory (Hood) 39 ND 8124: Radioisotope Research Laboratory 0 ND 8124: Radioisotope Research Laboratory 0 ND Bl28: Instrument Repair Shop 0 ND 8136 Gamma Analyzer Room 0 ND CIOO: Radiation Center Director's Office 0 ND ( 1) The total recorded dose equivalent values do not include natural background contribution and, reflect the summation of the results of four quarterly beta-gamma dosimeters or four quarterly fast neutron dosimeters for each location. A total dose equiva-lent of"ND" indicates that each of the dosimeters during the reporting period was less than the vendor's gamma dose report-ing threshold of 10 mrem or that each of the fast neutron dosimeters was less than the vendor's threshold of 10 mrem. "NIA" indicates that there was no neutron monitor at that location. 16-17 Annual Report
Radiation Protection .. --*111 Monitor 1.0. MRCCI06A MRCCJ068 MRCC106-H MRCCll8 MRCC120 MRCFIOO MRCF102 MRC8125N MRCN125S MRCCl24 MRCCl30 MRCOIOO MRCOI02 MRCOI02-H MRCDI06-H MRC0200 MRCD202 MRC8RR MRCD204 MRCATHRL MRC0300 MRCAl44 Table V.8 (continued) Total Dose Equivalent Recorded on Area Dosimeters Located Within the Radiation Center Total Recorded Radiation Center Dose Equivalent< 1> Facility Location (See Figure Y. l) XB(y) Neutron (mrem) (mrem) CI06A: Office 0 ND CI 068: Custodian Supply Storage 22 ND C106H: East Loading Dock 0 ND C118: Radiochemistry Laboratory 0 ND C120: Student Counting Laboratory 0 ND FIOO: APEX Facility 0 ND FI02: APEX Control Room 0 ND 81 25: Gamma Analyzer Room (Storage Cave) 36 ND 8125: Gamma Analyzer Room 0 ND C124: Classroom 0 ND C130: Radioisotope Laboratory (Hood) 0 ND 0100: Reactor Support Laboratory 0 ND 0102: Pneumatic Transfer Terminal Laboratory 224 ND 0102H: Jst Floor Corridor at Dl02 84 ND Dl06H: 1st Floor Corridor at 0106 380 ND D200: Reactor Administrator's Office 150 ND D202: Senior Health Physicist's Office 232 ND 0 200H: Rear Personnel Dosimetry Storage Rack 11 ND D204: Health Physicist Office 344 ND FI04: ATHRL 0 ND D300: 3rd Floor Conference Room 164 ND Al44: Radioisotope Research Laboratory 0 ND (I) The total recorded dose equivalent values do not include natural background contribution and, reflect the summation of the results of four quarterly beta-gamma dosimeters or four quarterly fast neutron dosimeters for each location. A total dose equiva-lent of"ND" indicates that each of the dosimeters during the reporting period was less than the vendor's gamma dose report-ing threshold of I 0 mrem or that each of the fast neutron dosimeters was less than the vendor's threshold of 10 mrem. NIA" indicates that there was no neutron monitor at that location. 16-17 Annual Report
adiation Protection Table V.9 Annual Summary of Radiation and Contamination Levels Observed Within the Reactor Facility and Radiation Center During Routine Radiation Surveys Accessible Location (See Figure V. l) TRJGA Reactor Facility: Reactor Top (D 104) Reactor 2nd Deck Area (D 104) Reactor Bay SW (D104) Reactor Bay NW (0104) Reactor Bay NE (D 1 04) Reactor Bay SE (D 1 04) Class Experiments (D 104, D302) Demineralizer Tank & Make Up Water System (D104A) Particulate Filter--Outside Shielding (Dl04A) Radiation Center: NAA Counting Rooms (A 146, B 100) Health Physics Laboratory (Al38) 60Co Irradiator Room and Calibration Rooms (Al28, BJ20, Al30) Radiation Research Labs (A 126, A 136) (BIOS, Bl 14, Bl22, Bl24, Cl26, Cl30, A144) Radioactive Source Storage (B 119, Bl l 9A, Al20A, Al32A) Student Chemistry Laboratory (C 118) Student Counting Laboratory (C120) Operations Counting Room (B136, B125) Pneumatic Transfer Laboratory (D 102) RX support Room (D 100) Whole Body Radiation Levels (mrem/hr) Average I Maximum 2.0 100 6.5 60 <I 10 <l 14 <l 30 <l 10 <l 6 <] 10 < l 3.8 <I 1.3 <I <1 < l 9 <] 6 <l 20 <] <1 <] <l <1 <1 <1 1.2 <l <1 Contamination Levels<1> (dpm/cm2) Average I Maximum <500 1,731 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 1,129 <500 2,581 <500 6,290 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 (I) <500 dpm/100 cm2 = Less than the lower limit of detection for the portable survey instrument used. 16-17 Annual Report
Radiation Protectio Table V.10 Total Dose Equivalent at the TRIGA Reactor Facility Fence Fence Total Recorded Dose Equivalent Environmental Monitoring Station (Including Background) Based on Mirion TLDs<1*2> (See Figure V.1) (mrem) MRCFE-1 78 +/- 3 MRCFE-2 73 +/- 2 MRCFE-3 71+/-1 MRCFE-4 79+/-4 MRCFE-5 79+/-2 MRCFE-6 78 +/- 3 MRCFE-7 79+/- 2 MRCFE-8 75 +/- 3 MRCFE-9 74+/-2 (I) Average Corvallis area natural background using Mirion TLDs totals 73 +/- 5 mrem for the same period. (2) +/-values represent the standard deviation of the total value at the 95% confidence level. 16-17 Annual Report
Radiation Protection Table V.11 Total Dose Equivalent at the Off-Site Gamma Radiation Monitoring Stations Off-Site Radiation Total Recorded Dose Equivalent Monitoring Station (Including Background) Based on Mirion TLDs<1*2> (See Figure V.1) (mrem) MRCTE-2 75 +/- 1 MRCTE-3 75 +/- 2 MRCTE-4 73 +/- 3 MRCTE-5 85 +/- 3 MRCTE-6 77 +/- 2 MRCTE-7 79+/- 2 MRCTE-8 90+/- 3 MRCTE-9 81 +/- 3 MRCTE-10 67+/-2 MRCTE-12 82 +/- 3 MRCTE-13 73 +/- 3 MRCTE-14 74 +/- 3 MRCTE-15 70+/- 3 MRCTE-16 79 +/- 1 MRCTE-17 71+/-2 MRCTE-18 76 +/- 3 MRCTE-19 78 +/- 4 MRCTE-20 74 +/- 2 MRCTE-21 65 +/- 2 MRCTE-22 72+/-2 (1) Average Corvallis area natural background using Mirion TLDs totals 73 +/- 5 mrem for the same period. (2) +/- values represent the standard deviation of the total value at the 95% confidence level. 16-17 Annual Report
Radiation Protecti TableV.12 Annual Average Concentration of the Total Net Beta Radioactivity (minus 3H) for Environmental Soil, Water, and Vegetation Samples Sample Sample Annua l Average Concentration Location Type Of the Total Net Beta (Minus 3H) (See Fig. V.1) Radioactiv ity<1> 1-W Water NIA 4-W Water NIA 11-W Water l.60x Io-7< 2 19-RW Water 2.88x 10-6' 2 3-S Soil 3.83x 10-5 +/- 8.61 x l0-6 5-S Soil 6.50x10-5 +/- 7.85x10-6 20-S Soil 5.04x 10-5< 2> 21-S Soil l.33x 10-5 ' 2 2-G Grass 4.36x10-5 ' 2 6-G Grass 4.36x 1 o-5 ( 2 ) 7-G Grass 1.78x l0-4 +/- 2.97x 10-5 8-G Grass 2.03x 10-4 +/- 2. 78x 10-5 9-G Grass 2.80x10-4 +/- 3.1Ix10-5 10-G Grass 2.99x10-4 +/- 2.62x10-5 12-G Grass 2.1 5x 10-4 +/- 3.1 5x lo-5 13-G Grass J.59x10-4 +/- 2.64x10-5 14-G Grass
- 2. I 5x I o-4 +/- 2.60x I o-5 15-G Grass 2.28x 10-4 +/- 2.81 x 10-5 16-G Grass 1.69x I o-4 +/- 2.63x 10-5 17-G Grass 2.55x 10-4 +/- 3. l 5x 10-5 18-G Grass 2.70x 10-4 +/- 3.96x I o-5 22-G Grass l.55x10-4 +/- 3.79x10-5
( I) +/- values represent the standard deviation of the value at the 95% confidence level. (2) Less than lower limit of detection value shown. Reporting U nits µCi m1-l µCi m1-l µCimt-1 µCi m1-l µCi g-1 of dry soil µCi g-1 of dry soil µCi g-1 of dry soil µCi g-1 of dry soil µCi g-1 of dry asb µCi g-1 of dry ash µCi g-1 of dry ash µCi g-1 of dry ash µCi g-1 of dry ash µCi g-1 of dry ash µCi g-1 of dry ash µCi g-1 of dry ash µCi g-1 of dry asb µCi g-1 of dry ash µCi g-1 of dry ash µCi g-1 of dry ash µCi g-1 of dry ash µCi g-1 of dry ash 16-17 Annual Report
Radiation Protection Table V.13 Beta-Gamma Concentration and Range of LLD Values for Soil, Water, and Vegetation Samples Sample Average Range of Values Reporting Units Type Value Soil 3.19x10-5 l.33x 10-5 to 5.04x 10-5 µCi g-1 of dry soil Water I.52x I o-6 (I) 1.60x Io-7 to 2.88x I o-6 < 1> µCi mi-1 Vegetation 2.28x10-4 l.78xl0-4 to 2.99x10-4 µCi g-1 of dry ash (I) Less than lower limit of detection value shown. 16-17 Annual Report
Radiation Protecti Table V.14 Annual Summary of Radioactive Material Shipments Originating From the TRIGA Reactor Facility's NRC License R-106 Number of Shipments Shipped To Total Activity Exempt Limited Yellow Yellow Total (TBq) Quantity II III Arizona State University 8.42x10*7 0 I 0 0 I Tucson, AZ USA Berkeley Geochronology Center 9.8lxJ0*7 8 Berkeley, CA USA I 0 0 9 Lawrence Livermore National Lab 6.59xlo-s I 0 0 0 I Livennore, CA USA Materion Corporation 4.8J x10*2 0 0 0 5 5 Elmore, OH USA Materion Natural Resources 8.3 lxl0*2 0 0 0 19 19 Delta, UT USA Occidental College 2.55x t 0-9 I 0 0 0 I Los Angeles, CA USA Oregon State University 2.72xJ0*6 4 3 I 0 8 CorvaJ)js, OR USA Reed College J.79x10*9 I 0 0 0 l Portland, OR USA Syracuse University 3.78x10*8 2 0 0 0 2 Syracuse, NY USA University of Arizona l.10xJ0*7 7 Tucson, AZ USA 0 0 0 7 University of California at Berkeley 3.24x 10-1 0 0 l 0 I Berkeley, CA USA University of California at Santa Barbara l.08xl0*6 0 0 I 0 I Santa Barbara, CA USA University of Florida l.22x10-1 0 I 0 0 I Gainesville, FL USA University of Nevada Las Vegas 2.88xJ0-6 0 0 I 0 I Las Vegas, NV USA University of New Mexico 3.6l xJ0*6 I 0 2 0 3 Albuquerque, NM USA University ofVennont 4.78xJ0*8 I 0 0 0 I Burlington, VT USA University of Wisconsin-Madison I.22xJ0-5 0 2 2 0 4 Madison, WI USA Totals 1.3Ix10-1 26 8 8 24 66 16-17 Annual Report
TableV.15 Annual Summary of Radioactive Material Shipments Originating From the Radiation Center's State of Oregon License ORE 90005 Total Activity Number of Shipments Shipped To Limited (TBq) Exempt Quantity White I Yellow III Argonne National lab 3.70x I Q-4 0 0 0 1 Argonne, IL USA Idaho National Laboratory l.90x10-5 0 I 0 0 Jdaho Falls, lD USA Los Alamos National Lab 3.28xJ0-6 8 2 0 Los Alamos, NM USA .) University ofTennesse, Knoxville LI lxJ0-5 0 0 I 0 Knoxville, TN USA Totals 4.03xJ0-4 3 9 3 1 Table V.16 Annual Summary of Radioactive Material Shipments Exported Under NRC General License 10 CFR 110.23 Number of Shipments Shipped To Total Activity Exempt Limited Yellow (TBq) Quantity II China University of Petroleum 2.35x I 0*8 3 0 0 Beijing, CHINA Curtin University of Technology l.27x J0*5 0 0 3 Bently Western Australia AUSTRALIA Dalhousie University 1.63xJ0*8 I 0 0 Halifax, Nova Scotia CANADA Geoazur 7.82xJ0-8 0 I 0 Valbonne, FRANCE Geological Survey of japan J.76x I 0*1 I 0 0 Jbaraki, JAPAN Geomar Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research 3.00xJ0*8 I 0 0 Kiel, GERMANY Glasgow University J.80x I o-s I 0 0 Glasgow SCOTLAND ISTO l.09xJ0*6 0 2 0 Orleans, FANCE 16-17 Annual Report Total 1 I 13 I 16 Total 3 3 I I I I I 2
Radiation Protection Table V.16 (continued) Annual Summary of Radioactive Material Shipments Exported Under NRC General License 10 CFR 110.23 Number of Shipments Total Activity Exempt Limited Yellow Total Shipped To (TBq) Quantity II Korean Baskic Science Institute 9.59xJ0*8 5 0 0 5 Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do KOREA Lanzhou Center of Oil and Gas Resources l.66x 10*8 I 0 0 I Lanzhou, CHINA Lanzhou University
- 2. I 3x I 0-8 I
0 0 I Lanzhou, Gansu CHINA Northwest University
- 9. IOxJ0-9 I
0 0 I XiAn, CHINA Polish Academy of Sciences 4.44x t0*8 2 0 0 2 Krakow, POLAND QUAD-Lab, Natural Histoyr Museum of Denmark 1.60x I o-s 2 0 0 2 Copenhagen, DEMARK Scottish Universities Research & Reactor Centre l.76x I 0-{; I 3 0 4 East Kilbride, SCOTLAND Tongji University l.95x 10-s I 0 0 I Shanghai, CHINA Universidade de Sao Paulo l.67x !0*7 3 0 0 3 San Paulo, BRAZIL Universitat Potsdam 3.40x I 0-8 1 0 0 I Postdarn, GERMANY University of Geneva 4.78x10.{; 3 2 I 6 Geneva, SWITZERLAND University of Manitoba 2.19xl0.{; 2 2 0 4 Winnipeg, CANADA University of Melbourne
- 2. 15xl0.{;
2 3 0 5 Parkville, Victoria AUSTRALIA University of Padova 7.66x!0*9 2 0 0 2 Padova, ITALY University of Queensland 2.26x10.{; I 0 I 2 Brisbane, Queensland AUSTRALIA University of Waikato 6.80xJ0*9 I 0 0 I Hamilton, NEW ZEALAND Victoria University of Wellington 6.13x 10-s 2 0 0 2 Wellington, NEW ZELAND Vrijc Universiteit L94x10.{; I I I 3 Amsterdam, THE NETHERLANDS Totals 2.97xJO*l 39 14 6 59 16-17 Annual Report
adiation Protection Figure V.1 Monitoring Stations for the OSU TRIGA Reactor -**. -~ *
- U*,. -.. : :
-~ ft C4IDIA 'nJlcu;rDC T& C4llKA 'nJllTJ.Dal( G c::a.us W WA.tu. aw M.ll(WA'TD. 16-17 Annual Report Nan: T& UIS LOCA%DS ICZSllOVtll ~MllUJIDl(allrD.Ar 'la~AU.ISAm'OU
-Work Summary The Radiation Center offers a wide variety of resources for teaching, research, and service related to radiation and radioac-tive materials. Some of these are discussed in detail in other parts of this report. The purpose of this section is to sum-marize the teaching, research, and service efforts carried out during the current reporting period. Teaching An important responsibility of the Radiation Center and the reactor is to support OSU's academic programs. implementa-tion of this support occurs through direct involvement of the Center's staff and facilities in the teaching programs of various departments and through participation in University research programs. Table lll.2 plus the "Training and lnstuction" sec-tion (see next page) provide detailed information on the use of the Radiation Center and reactor for instruction and training. Research and Service Almost all Radiation Center research and service work is tracked by means of a project database. When a request for facility use is received, a project number is assigned and the project is added to the database. The database includes such information as the project number, data about the person and institution requesting the work, information about students in-volved, a description of the project, Radiation Center resources needed, the Radiation Center project manager, status of indi-vidual runs, billing information, and the funding source. Table VI. I provides a summary of institutions which used the Radiation Center during this reporting period. This table also includes additional information about the number of academic personnel involved, the number of students involved, and the number of uses logged for each organization. The major table in this section is Table Vl.2. This table provides a listing of the research and service projects carried out during this reporting period and lists information relating to the personnel and institution involved, the type of project, and the funding agency. Projects which used the reactor are indicated by an asterisk. ln addition to identifying specific projects carried out during the current reporting period, Part VI
- also highlights major Radiation Center capabilities in research and service. These unique Center functions are described in the following text.
Neutron Activation Analysis Neutron activation analysis (NAA) stands at the forefront of techniques for the quantitative multi-element analysis of major, minor, trace, and rare elements. The principle involved in NAA consists of first irradiating a sample with neutrons in a nuclear reactor such as the OSTR to produce specific radionuclides. Af-ter the irradiation, the characteristic gamma rays emitted by the decaying radionuclides are quantitatively measured by suitable semiconductor radiation detectors, and the gamma rays de-tected at a particular energy are usually indicative of a specific radionuclide's presence. Computerized data reduction of the gamma ray spectra then yields the concentrations of the various elements in samples being studied. With sequential instrumental NAA it is possible to measure quantitatively about 35 elements in small samples (5 to IOO mg), and for activable elements the lower limit of detection is on the order of parts per million or parts per billion, depending on the element. 16-17 Annual Report
The Radiation Center's NAA laboratory has analyzed the major, minor, and trace element content of tens of thousands of samples covering essentially the complete spectrum of material types and involving virtually every scientific and technical field. While some researchers perform their own sample counting on their own or on Radiation Center equipment, the Radia-tion Center provides a complete NAA service for researchers and others who may require it. This includes sample prepara-tion, sequential irradiation and counting, and data reduction and analysis. Irradiations As described throughout this report, a major capability of the Radiation Center involves the irradiation of a large variety of substances with gamma rays and neutrons. Detailed data on these irradiations and their use are included in Part III as well as in the "Research & Service" text of this section. Radiological Emergency Response Services The Radiation Center has an emergency response team capable ofresponding to all types of radiological accidents. This team directly supports the City of Corvallis and Benton County emergency response organizations and medical fa-cilities. The team can also provide assistance at the scene of any radiological incident anywhere in the state of Oregon on behalf of the Oregon Radiation Protection Services and the Oregon Department of Energy. The Radiation Center maintains dedicated stocks of radio-logical emergency response equipment and instrumentation. These items are located at the Radiation Center and at the Good Samaritan Hospital in Corvallis. During the current reporting period, the Radiation Center emergency response team conducted several training ses-sions and exercises, but was not required to respond to any actual incidents. Training and Instruction rn addition to the academic laboratory classes and courses discussed in Parts Ill and VI, and in addition to the routine training needed to meet the requirements of the OSTR Emer-gency Response Plan, Physical Security Plan, and operator requalification program, the Radiation Center is also used for special training programs. Radiation Center staff are well ex-perienced in conducting these special programs and regularly offer training in areas such as research reactor operations, Work research reactor management, research reactor radiation protection, radiological emergency response, reactor behav-ior (for nuclear power plant operators), neutron activation analysis, nuclear chemistry, and nuclear safety analysis. Special training programs generally fall into one of several categories: visiting faculty and research scientists; Interna-tional Atomic Energy Agency fellows; special short-term courses; or individual reactor operator or health physics training programs. During this reporting period there were a large number of such people as shown in the People Section. As has been the practice since 1985, Radiation Center personnel annually present a HAZMAT Response Team Ra-diological Course. This year the course was held at Oregon State University. Radiation Protection Services The primary purpose of the radiation protection program at the Radiation Center is to support the instruction and research conducted at the Center. However, due to the high quality of the program and the level of expertise and equip-ment available, the Radiation Center is also able to provide health physics services in support ofOSU Radiation Safety and to assist other state and federal agencies. The Radiation Center does not compete with private industry, but supplies health physics services which are not readily available else-where. In the case of support provided to state agencies, this definitely helps to optimize the utilization of state resources. The Radiation Center is capable of providing health phys-ics services in any of the areas which are discussed in Part V. These include personnel monitoring, radiation surveys, sealed source leak testing, packaging and shipment of radio-active materials, calibration and repair of radiation monitor-ing instruments (discussed in detail in Part VI), radioactive waste disposal, radioactive material hood flow surveys, and radiation safety analysis and audits. The Radiation Center also provides services and technical support as a radiation laboratory to the State of Oregon Radi-ation Protection Services (RPS) in the event of a radiological emergency within the state of Oregon. In this role, the Radia-tion Center will provide gamma ray spectrometric analysis of water, soil, milk, food products, vegetation, and air samples collected by RPS radiological response field teams. As part of the ongoing preparation for this emergency support, the Radiation Center participates in inter-institution drills. 16-17 Annual Report
Work Radiological Instrument Repair and Calibration While repair of nuclear instrumentation is a practical neces-sity, routine calibration of these instruments is a licensing and regulatory requirement which must be met. As a result, the Radiation Center operates a radiation instrument repair and calibration facility which can accommodate a wide vari-ety of equipment. The Center's scientific instrument repair facility performs maintenance and repair on all types of radiation detectors and other nuclear instrumentation. Since the Radiation Cen-ter's own programs regularly utilize a wide range of nuclear instruments, components for most common repairs are often on hand and repair time is therefore minimized. ln addition to the instrument repair capability, the Radia-tion Center has a facility for calibrating essentially all types of radiation monitoring instruments. This includes typical portable monitoring instrumentation for the detection and measurement of alpha, beta, gamma, and neutron radiation, as well as instruments designed for low-level environmental monitoring. Higher range instruments for use in radiation accident situations can also be calibrated in most cases. Instrument calibrations are performed using radiation sources certified by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) or traceable to NJST. Table Vl.3 is a summary of the instruments which were cali-brated in support of the Radiation Center's instructional and research programs and the OSTR Emergency Plan, while Table YI.4 shows instruments calibrated for other OSU departments and non-OSU agencies. Consultation Radiation Center staff are available to provide consultation ser-vices in any of the areas discussed in this Annual Report, but in particular on the subjects ofresearch reactor operations and use, radiation protection, neutron activation analysis, radiation shielding, radiological emergency response, and radiotracer methods. Records are not normally kept of such consultations, as they often take the form of telephone conversations with research-ers encountering problems or planning the design of experi-ments. Many faculty members housed in the Radiation Center have ongoing professional consulting functions with various organizations, in addition to sitting on numerous committees in advisory capacities. Table Vl.1 Institutions, Agencies and Groups Which Utilized the Radiation Center Number of Number of Times of Intuitions, Agencies and Groups Projects Faculty Involvement Alternative Nutrition LLC Casa Grande, AZ USA 1 0
- Arizona State University Tempe, AZ USA I
0
- Berkeley Geochronology Center 1
0 Berkeley, CA USA CDMSmith Edison. NJ USA I 0
- Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Co.
I 0 Monroe, NC USA Chemical Bilogical &Environmental Engineering 1 I Corvallis, OR USA
- China University of Geosciences I
0 Beijing, CHINA
- Chinga University of Petroleum - Beijing Changping, Beijing CHINA I
1 Colorado Gem and Mineral Co. Tempe, AZ USA I 0 Number ot Uses of Center Facilities l I 14 6 1 7 1 2 5 16-17 Annual Report
Table Vl.1 (continued) Institutions, Agencies and Groups Which Utilized the Radiation Center Number of Number of Times of Intuitions, Agencies and Groups Projects Faculty Involvement
- Dalhousie University I
2 Haljfax, Novia Scotia CANADA Department of Biomedical Sciences l 1 Corvallis, OR USA Genis, lnc. I 0 Reykjavik, ICELAND
- Geoazur I
0 Valbonne, FRANCE
- Geological Survey of Japan/AIST l
0 Tsukuba, lbaraki, JAPAN
- Helmoholtz-Zentrum fur Ozeanforschung Kiel (GEOMAR)
I 0 Kiel, GERMANY Innovative Plants LLC Decatur, AL USA I 0
- INSU-CNRS - Universite d'Orleans Orleans, FRANCE 1
I
- Korea Basic Science Institute I
1 Cheongwon-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do SOUTH KOREA
- Lanzhou Center of Oil and Gas Resources, CAS I
I Lanzhou, CHINA
- Lanzhou University l
0 Lanzhou City, Gansu Province CHlNA
- Lanzhou University I
0 Lanzhou, CHINA
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory l
0 Livermore, CA USA Lonza I l Alpharetta, GA USA
- Materion Brush, Inc.
I 0 Elmore, OH USA
- Materion Natural Resources I
0 Delta, UT USA
- Northwest University I
0 Xi'An, CHINA
- Occidental College l
l Los Angeles, CA USA
- Oregon State University<1>
22 58 Corvallis, OR USA
- Oregon State University - Educational Tours I
0 Corvallis, OR USA 16-17 Annual Report Work Number ot Uses of Center Faci l itii>~ 1 3 4 I l 2 13 3 5 I I I 2 5 7 14 l 1 95 <2> 16
Work Table Vl.1 (continued) Institutions, Agencies and Groups Which Utilized the Radiation Center Number of Number of Times of Intuitions, Agencies and Groups Projects Faculty Involvement
- Oregon State University Radiation Center I
l Corvallis, OR USA OSU Crop and Soil Science I l Hermiston, OR USA
- Polish Academy of Sciences 1
0 Krakow, POLAND
- Quaternary Dating Laboratory I
0 Roskilde, DENMARK Radiation Protection Services 1 0 Portland, OR USA
- Scottish Universities Enfironmental Research Centre I
0 East Kilbride UK
- Syracuse University 2
2 Syracuse, NY USA Terra Nova Nurseries, Inc. 1 0 Camby, OR USA The Biointerfaces Institute 1 I Ann Arbor, MI USA
- The University of Waikato I
1 Hamilton, NEW ZEALAND
- Tongji University I
I Shanghai, CHINA
- Universita' Degli Studi di Padova I
2 Padova ITALIA University of Alaska I 2 Anchorage, AK USA University of Arizona 2 3 Tucson, AZ USA
- University of California at Berkeley l
0 Santa Barbara, CA USA
- University of Florida 1
0 Gainesville, FL USA
- University of Geneva I
1 Geneva SWITZERLAND
- University of Glasgow I
0 Glasgow SCOTLAND
- University of Manitoba I
1 Winnipeg, Manitoba CANADA
- University of Melbourne I
1 Melbourne, Victoria AUSTRALIA Numberot Uses of Center f<1<'i lities 11 I 2 4 2 8 2 4 6 2 2 2 3 7 I I 8 I 5 6 16-17 Annual Report
Table Vl.1 (continued) Institutions, Agencies and Groups Which Utilized the Radiation Center Number of Number of Times of Intuitions, Agencies and Groups Projects Faculty Involvement University ofNebraska-Lincoln 1 I Lincoln, NE USA
- University of Nevada Las Vegas I
I Las Vegas, NV USA
- University of Oregon I
4 Eugene, OR USA
- University of Queensland I
I Brisbane, Queensland AUSTRALIA
- University of Sao Paulo 2
I Sao Paulo BRAZLL University of Texas I I Austin, TX USA
- University of Vermont I
I Burlington, VT USA Unjversity of Washington I 0 Seattle, WA USA
- University of Wisconsin I
I Madison, WI USA UNM I 0 Albuquerque, NM USA US National Parks Service I 0 Crater Lake, OR USA USDA Forest Service 1 0 Crater Lake, OR USA
- Victoria University of Wellington 1
0 Wellington, NEW ZEALAND
- Vrije Universiteit I
I Amsterdam THE NETHERLANDS
- Wayne State University I
2 Detroit, MI USA
- Western Australian Argon Isotope Facility I
0 Perth, Western Australia AUSTRALIA Totals 89 99 Project which involves the OSTR. Number ot Uses of Center Farilitii><: I I 4 I 3 2 I I 5 4 3 I 4 3 4 6 337 (I) (2) Use by Oregon State University does not include any teachjng activities or classes accommodated by the Radiation Center. This number does not include on going projects being performed by residents of the Radiation Center such as the APEX project, others in the Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics or Department of Chemistry or projects conducted by Dr. Walt Loveland, which involve daily use of the Radiation Center facilities. 16-17 Annual Report Work
Project Users 444 Duncan 815 Morrell 920 Becker 1074 Wijbrans 1191 Vasconcelos 1353 Kamp 1366 Quidelleur 1404 Riera-Lizarau 1419 Krane 1465 Singer Teaching and 1504 Tours Teaching and 1509 Tours 1514 Sobel 1523 Zattin Table Vl.2 Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description Oregon State Ar-40/Ar-39 Dating of Oceanographic Production of Ar-39 from K-39 to measure radiometric ages on basaltic rocks from ocean University Samples basins. Oregon State Sterilization of Wood Samples Sterilization of wood samples to 2.5 Mrads in Co-University 60 irradiator for fungal evaluations. Berkeley Ar-39/ Ar-40 Age Dating Production of Ar-39 from K-39 to determine ages Geochronology Center i.n various antbropologic and geologic materials. Vrije Universiteit Ar/ Ar Dating of Rocks and Minerals Ar/Ar dating of rocks and minerals. University of Production of Ar-39 from K-39 to determine ages Ar-39/Ar-40 Age Dating Queensland in various anthropologic and geologic materials. Determination of history and timing of denudation The University of Fission Track Thermochronology of of basement terranes in New Zealand and thermal Waikato New Zealand history of late Cretaceous-Cenozoic sedimentary basins. Universite Paris-Sud Ar-Ar Geochronology Determination of geological samples via Ar-Ar radiometric dating. Oregon State Evaluation of wheat DNA Gamma irradiation of wheat seeds. University Study ofN=90 isotone structure (Sm-152, Gd-Oregon State Nuclear Structure ofN=90 Jsotones 154, Dy-156) from decays of Eu-152, Eu-l 52m, University Eu-154, Tb-154, and Ho-156. Samples will be counted at LBNL. University of Ar-40/Ar-39 Dating of Young Geologic Irradiation of geological materials such as volcanic Wisconsin Materials rocks from sea floor, etc. for Ar-40/ Ar-39 dating. Oregon State OSU Nuclear Engineering & Radiation University - Health Physics Department OSTR tour and reactor lab. Educational Tours Oregon State University - HAZMAT course tours First responder training tours. Educational Tours Universitat Potsdam Apatite Fission Track Analysis Age determination of apatites by fission track analysis. Universita' Degli Studi Fission track analysis of Apatites Fission track dating method on apatites by fission diPadova track analysis. Funding OSU Oceanography Department OSU Forest Products Berkeley Geochronology Center Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Earth Sciences, University of Queensland University of Waikato Universite Paris-Sud OSU Crop and Soil Science OSU Physics Department University of Wisconsin NA NA Universitat Potsdam NA
Project Users 1555 Fitzgerald 1568 Spell 1617 Spikings 1623 Blythe 1660 Reactor Operations Staff + 1674 Niles 1692 Estell 1717 Baldwin 1745 Girdner 1767 Korlipara 1768 Bringman 1777 Storey 1778 Gislason 1816 Kounov Table Vl.2 (continued) Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description Irradiation to induce U-235 fission for fission track thermal history dating, especially for hydrocarbon Syracuse University Fission track thermochronology exploration. The main thrust is towards tectonics, in particular the uplift and formation of mountain ranges. University ofNevada Ar/Ar geochronology and Fission Track Argon dating of Chilean granites. Las Vegas dating University of Geneva Ar-Ar geochronology and Fission Track Argon dating of Chilean granites. dating Occidental College Fission Track Analysis Fission track Thermochronology of geological samples Oregon State Operations support of the reactor and Operations use of the reactor in support of reactor University faci I ities testing and facilities testing. Radiological emergency support ot OOE related Oregon Department of to instrument calibration, radiological and Radiological Emergency Support RAM transport consulting, and maintenance of Energy radiological analysis laboratory at the Radiation Center. This is to build up basic knowledge on Lonza Screening Tests of Wood Decay the efficacy of a copper based preservative in preventing decay of wood inhabiting basidiomycetes. Syracuse University Ari Ar Dating Ar/Ar Dating. US National Parks C 14 Measurements LSC analysis of samples for C14 measurements. Service Terra Nova Nurseries, Genera Modifications using gamma Use of gamma and fast neutron irradiations for lnc. irradiation genetic studies in genera. Brush-Wellman Antimony Source Production Production of Sb-124 sources. Quaternary Dating Quaternary Dating Production of Ar"39 from K-39 to determine Laboratory radiometric ages of geological materials. This project subjects chitosan polymer in 40 and 70% DDA formulations to 9 and 18 Kgy, boundary Genis, Inc Gamma exposure ofChitosan polymer doses for commerical sterilization for the purpose of detennine changes in the molecular weight and product formu lation properites. Geologisch-Palaontologisches Fission Track Analysis Geochronology analysis using fission track dating. Jnstitut Funding Syracuse University University of Nevada Las Vegas University of Geneva Occidental College NA Oregon Department of Energy Lonza Syracuse University US National Parks Service Terra Nova Nurseries, Lnc. Brush-Wellman Quaternary Dating Laboratory Genis, Inc. Geologisch-Palaontolo-gisches Instut
en I...... -....J )>
- J
- J c
Q)
- 0 (I)
"O 0
- i Project 1818 1819 1820 1823 1831 1832 1841 1855 186l 1864 1865 1878 1882 1886 1887 1904 1905 1907 Users Sabey Vetter Joli vet Harper Thomson Min Swindle Anczkiewicz Page Gans Carra pa Roden-Tice Bray Coutand Farsoni Mine Fellin Tanguay Table Vl.2 (continued)
Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description Brush Wellman Antimony source production (Utah) University of NE-104A INAA source Stainless Steel disk source for JNAA lab. California at Berkeley Universite Montpellier Fission Track Analysis Use of fission track analysis for geochronology. II Oregon State Evaluation of Au nanoparticle uptake INAA of gold concentrations in zebrafish embryos University to evaluate nanoparticle uptake. Fission track tbermochronometry of the University of Arizona Fission Track Patagonian Andes and the Northern Apennines, ltaly. University of Florida Ar/Ar Dating Ar/Ar dating. University of Arizona Ar/Ar dating of ordinary chondritic Ari Ar dating of ordinary chondritic meterorites. meterorites Polish Academy of Fission Track Services Verification of AFT data for illite-mechte data. Sciences Lund University Lund University Geochronology Ar/Ar Geochronology. University of Production of Ar-39 from K-40 to determine California at Santa Ar-40/Ar-39 Sample Dating radiometric ages of geologic samples. Barbara Apatite fission track to reveal the exhumation University of Fission Track Irradiations history ofrocks from the ID-WY-UY postion Wyoming of the Sevier fold and thrust belt, Nepal, and Argentina. Plattsburgh State Fission-track research Use of fission tracks to detrmine location of235U, University 232Th in natural rocks and minerals. Wayne State Univerity INAA of Archaeological Ceramics from Trace-element analysis of Inca-period ceramics for South America provenance determination. Dalhousie University Fission Track Irradiation Fission track irradiations of apatite samples. Oregon State Xenon Gas Production Production of xenon gas. University Oregon State INAA of Archaeological Ceramics from Trace-element analyses of ceramics from Ecuador University Ecuador for provenance determination. ETH Zurich Fission Track Analysis Use of fission tracks to determine location of 235U, 232Th in natural rocks and minerals. Oregon State Nanoparticle Uptake in Zebrafish INAA to determine the uptake by zebrafish University Embryos embryos of various metals in nanoparticle form. Funding Brush-Wellman University of California at Berkeley University of Montpellier If OSU Environmental Health Sciences Center Yale University University of Florida University of Arizona Polish Academy of Sciences Lund University University of California at Santa Barbara University of Wyoming Plattsburgh State University Wayne State University Dahousie University OSU NERHP NIA Geologiscbes lnstitut, ETH Zurich OSU Environmental and Molecular Toxicology
Project Users 1913 Reese 1914 Barfod 1916 Shusterman 1927 Seward 1929 Farsoni 1933 Loveland 1939 Wang 1957 Phillips 1958 Mine 1965 Webb 1975 McDonald 1979 Paulenova 1980 Carpenter 1990 Townsend 1991 Enjelmann 1995 Camacho 2000 Kaspar 2001 Derrick Table Vl.2 (continued) Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description Oregon State Fission Yield Determination Using Use of neutron activation to determine fission University Gamma Spectroscopy yields for various fissile and fertile materials using gamma spectroscopy. Scottish Universities Environmental Ar/Ar Age Dating Ari Ar age dating. Research Centre University of UC Berkeley Chemistry/NAA Introduction ofNAA by activation of human hair California at Berkeley to detect trace impurities. Victoria University of Fission Track Dating Fission track dating of apatite samples. Wellington Oregon State Source Activation Irradiation of different materials to make sources University for detection experiments. Oregon State Pt radiochemistry Production of tracer for testing chemical University separation of Pt from Pb. Lanzhou University Lanzhou University Fission Track Fission Track dating. University of Radiometric age dating of geologic Ari Ar age dating. Melbourne samples Oregon State INAA of Oaxaca Ceramics Trace-element analyses of prehistoric ceramics University from Oaxaca, Mexico, to determine provenance. University of Vermont Ar/Ar age dating Irradiation with fast neutrons to produce Ar-39 from K-39 for Ar/Ar geochronology. University of Glasgow Samuel Jaanne Use offissin tracks to determine last heating event of apatites. Oregon State Mixed Matrix Extraction Testing Multi-element, transition metal salt production for University mixed matrix extraction testing. Radiation Protection Sample counting Sample counting. Services The induction of genetic mutations in hop Oregon State (Humulus lupulus L.) will be attempted using Hop irradiation radiation treatment. Generated stable mutations University may lead to new hop varieties and assist with genetic research. University of Fission Track Dating Apatite fission track dating, study of Yukon and Cincinnati southeastern Alaska geological evolution. University of Manitoba Ari Ar dating Production of Ar-39 from K-39 to determine radiometric ages of geological materials. Alternative Nutrition Contamination detection in Taurine Look for contamination in Taurine that was LLC shiooed from Japan. Branch Engineering Densitometer Leak Test Wip counts for leak test of densitometer sources. Funding NIA Scottish Universities Research and Reactor Centre UC Berkeley Vitoria University of Wellington NA Lanzhou University University of Melbourne NSF Collaborative Research Project University of Vermont School of Geographical and Earth Science State of Oregon RPS OSU Crop and Soil Science University of Cincinnati University of Manitoba Branch Engineering
I-' en I I-' -..J )>
- l
- l c::
QJ
- 0 ro
"'C 0 ~ Project 2002 2003 2005 2007 2010 2011 2014 2015 2016 2017 Users Sosa Paul Stewart-Smith Wartho Helena Hollanda Mine Leonard Matosevic Schilke Jourdan Table Vl.2 (continued) Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description Universidad de Iridium in Soil Samples Epithermal INAA to determine Ir content in soils Granada at the K-T boundary. The membrane (polyacrylonitrile or PAN) which I am going to irradiate is used in kidney dialyzer. At present Medical agencies use ETO to sterilize the membrane. The other technique to sterilize is by using gamma irradiation. Recently some researchers used low dosage of gamma irradiation Oregon State Effect of gamma irratiation on to cross link this membrane with other organic University mass transport and mech prop of compound which makes membrane biocompatible polyacrylonitrile copolymer membrane and repel protein to make it more effective in blood purification. So our research question is whether we can both sterilize and graft the organic compound I n the membrane at the same time? Therefore I would be test the membrane for its mass transfer and mechanical properties for our research objective. Determination of radon concentration from Radon Daugheter Detection daughter products from samples collected around Oregon. Arizona State Argon-Argon Geochronology Fast neutron irradiation of mineral and rock University samples for 40 Ar/39Ar dating purposes. University of Sao Ar/ Ar Geological Dating Ar/Ar geologic dating of materials. Paulo Oregon State INAA of Archaeological Ceramics from Trace-element analyses of ancient ceramics and clays from Jalieza, Oaxaca to examine ceramic University Jalieza, Oaxaca techology and trade. Oregon State Barley Irradiation Barley irradiation to determine growth potential. University Investigation of irradiation on biological A solution of purified fibronectin in PBS and Akron Biotech activity of human plasma-derived lyophilized powder sarnpe offibronectin will be fibronectin. irradiated and the activity tested. Si02 surfaces were silanized (vapor deposition) Chemical, Biological with TCVS to create double bonds on surface. & Environmental TCVS Silanization for EGAP coating The surface is incubated in Polyethylene triblocks, Engineering once gamma irradiated it will bind the triblocks to the surface. Wester Australian Age dating of geological material Ari A f geochronology. Argon Isotope Facility Funding OSU Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Arizona State University University of Sao Paulo NIA OSU Crop and Soil Science Akron Biotech OSU Chemical Engineering Curtin University
- 0 ro "O
0.... r+ Project 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Users Reese Simonian Cassata lwaniec Tucker Brown Reese Mine Kim Fleishman Malusa Parham Table Vl.2 (continued) Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description Oregon State Neutron radiography of heater rods Use of neutron radiography to determine precise University location of the internal components of heater rods. Cypress Grove Chevre Dill pollen irradiation Gamma irradiation of dill pollen to sterlize yeast. Lawrence Livermore Ari Ar dating Production of neutron induced 39Ar from 39K for National Laboratory Ar/ Ar dating. This study involves bone marrow transplantation followed by hindlimb-unloading (a ground-based model of spaceflight). Four groups of mice will be studied: (1) weight-bearing WT mice transplanted with WT bone marrow derived hematopoietic stem cells, (2) hindlimb unloaded WT mice transplanted Oregon State Role of bone marrow adipocytes in bone with WT bone marrow derived hematopoietic University loss during simulated spaceflight stem cells, (3) weight-bearing Kitw/w-v mice transplanted with WT bone marrow derived hematopoietic stem cells, and (4) hindlimb unloaded Kitw/w-v mice transplanted with bone marrow derived hematopoietic stem cells; the mice will be hindlimb unloaded for 14 days and sacrificed. Oregon State lNAA of Niobium Neutron activation analysis ofNiobiurn for University characterization of impurities. CSTA, USARNORTH Source production for training purposes Source production to be used for training purposes for response teams. Oregon State Neutron Radiography of Antennae Neutron radiography of radio antennae. University Oregon State INAA of ceramics from the Ancient Provenance determination of ceramics from the University Near East Ancient Near East via trace-element analysis. Korea Basic Science Ari Ar geochronology Ar/Ar analysis for age dating of geological Institute samples. Northstar Glassworks, Uranium glass testing for alpha, beta, Determination of alpha, beta, gamma Inc. gamma radiation contamination, dose and activity of uranium glass sample. University of Milano-Fission track dating Use of fission tracks from U-235 to determine age Bicocca of rocks. PECO, Inc., an Leaktest of Po-210 sources Leaktest of Po-210 sources used for static Astronics Company discharge. Funding OSUNERHP Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory OSU Nutrition and Exercise Sciences OSU Mechanical Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering U.S. Army NIA OSU Anthropology Korea Basic Science Institute Northstar Glassworks, Inc. Universita degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Project Users 2033 Chang 2034 Morrell 2035 Wang 2036 Loveland 2037 Marcum 2038 Blakestad 2039 Gombart 2040 Tucker 2041 Marcum 2042 Walsh 2044 Olson Table Vl.2 (continued) Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description China University of Fission Track Fission track dating ofrock samples. Petroleum - Beijing Oregon State Sterilization of Wood Products Sterilization of wood to 2.0 Mrad for fungal University experiments. Lanzhou Center of Oil and Gas Resources, Fission Track Fission track dating of rock samples. CAS Oregon State Measurement of fission product TKE Measurement of fission product kinetic energy for University various fissile elements. Oregon State Core parameter Measurements using Using Cherenkov detectors to validate core operating history with large changes in reactor University Cherenkov Detection power (i.e., square wave). Mas Oro PGE determination of placer samples PGE determination of placer samples via INAA. Prevention of Infections Associated with Combat-related Injuries by Local Sustained Co-Delivery of Vitamin D3 and Other Immune-Boosting Compounds Award Mechanism. We are Oregon State Prevention oflnfections Associated preparing nanofiber wound dressings that contain with Combat-related J.njuries by Local compounds that will be released over time to University Sustained Co-Delivery induce the immune response in wounds to help prevent infection and speed wound healing. The nanofibers must be irradiated so that they are sterile. These experiments will be performed in cell culture and in animal models. PGNAA of Niobium for characterization of Oregon State Niobium impurity Determination impurities. This technique will be evaluated University against current standard methods for impurity determination. Use of neutron radiography to view degradation in Oregon State Neutron Radiography of ATR Capsules aluminum ATR capsules from endurance testing of University these capsules under continuous hydraulic loading over the course of a year. University of Oregon INAA of Ancient Ceramics from Korea Trace-element analyses of Neolithic and Bronze Age ceramics from SE Korea. point-of-use devices as incubators of This project investigates the bacterial colonization, changes of bacterial community structures, and University of Michigan halogenated phenol-mediated antibiotic development of antibiotic resistance in a drinking resistant bacteria water point-of-use filtration device. Funding China University of Petroleum - Beijing OSU Forest Products Lanzhou Center of Oil and Gas Resources, CAS NIA University of Oregon University of Michigan
en I...... -.....J )>
- l
- l c QJ
- 0 Ill "O
0 ~ Project 2045 2046 2047 2048 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 Users van den Bogaard Cann Parra Christensen Lee Perez Rodriguez Stone-Sundberg Paul en ova Buffington Loveland Loveland Dreilinger Table Vl.2 (continued) Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description Helmholtz-Zentrum fur Ozeanforschung GEOMARAr/Ar Ar/Ar dating research of geological samples. Kiel (GEOMAR) Oregon State Determination of oxygen content in Investigation into PGNAA to determine oxygen University metal alloys content in BaTi03. University of Sao Fission Track Dating Fission track dating of geologic materials. Paulo Oregon State INAA of IV Fluids JNAA to determine trace metal in TPN and University additives. University of Oregon Archaeological Ceramics fron Juju INAA to determine trace-element signature and Is land, Korea provenance ofarchaeological ceramics. University at Albany, Archaeological Ceramics from Cerro JNAA to determine trace-element composition SUNY Jazmin and provenance of ceramics from Cerro Jazmin, Oaxaca. Crystal Solutions, LLC Dopants in Synthetic Sapphire INAA to verify trace-element content of synthetic sapphires. Measuring the uptake of strontium by inorganic Oregon State (JONSIV) and organic (chitosan-based) sorbent Measuring the uptake of strontium materials. Kinetics of uptake will also be University evaluated. Natural strontium will be used as a carrier, and Sr-85 will serve as a tracer. Oregon State 137-Cs activity in coastal sediments 137-Cs activity in coastal sediments. University Oregon State Gamma Irradition Effects on HLW Evaluation of the effects of h igb levels of gamma University Sludge radiation on simulated Handord waste tank sludge. Oregon State Investigation into the effects of low level gamma Reactor Irradiation ofHLW Sludge and source neutrons on simulated Hanford waste University tank sludge. We're developing a resorbable polymer surgical NeuraMedica Dural Clip Development clip and applicator for durotomy closure (closure of incisions of the dura mater, membrane covering brain and spinal cord). Funding GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research University of Sao Paulo OSU College of Pharmacy National Geographic Explorer Grant Crystal Solutions, LLC osu NeuraMedica
Project Users 2058 Cronn 2059 Alanko 2060 Ishizuka 2061 Weiss 2062 Reese 2063 Bohanan 2064 Schaefer 2065 Nason Table Vl.2 (continued) Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description Gamma irradiation of pollen has been used successfully by plant geneticists to facilitate discovery of genes and chromosomal regions that control traits of interest in crops and trees like Gamma irradiation of Port-Orford Cedar poplar. Geneticists in the US Forest Service have USDA Forest Service pollen to generate chromosomal segment identified valuable single gene traits in Port-Orford deletions Cedar, an ecologically and economically important conifer native to Oregon. We would like to test whether pollen irradiation can be used to create deletion lines that have modified traits, with the goal of identifying the genes controlling these traits. Use of neutron radiography to determine the ATI Detection of Boron in Niobium Metal presense of boron minerals in niobium metal ingots samples Geological Survey of Ar/Ar geochronology of volcanic and igneous Japan/AIST Ar/ Ar Geochronology rocks associated with subduction initiation of oceanic island arc. Oregon State Neutron Radiography Imaging of Investigation into the applicablity of neutron University Concrete radiography for evaluating concrete curing processes. Oregon State Temporal Spectroscopy of Fissile Use of PGNAA facility to perform temporal University Materials spectroscopy for the purpose of determining fissile material content The plant microbiome is composed of bacteria and fungi that are vertically transmitted via the University of Oregon Microbial Inheritance in Seeds seed and horizontally transmitted via the soil. The goal of this project it to understand the relative contribution of seedborne versus soil borne microbes in producing the corn microbiome. We will be performing bench scale microcosm COM Smith Abiotic Dechlorination of chlorinated studies to measure the abiotic dechlorination in solvents in soil matrices. different soil matrices. Gamma irradiation will be used to sterilize the samples. JNAA to determine distribution of synthesized Oregon State Nanomaterials in Environmental gold-core, titanium dioxideshell nanoparticles University Matrices to better understand the environmental fate and transport of engineered nanomaterials. Funding USDA Forest Service Geological Survey of Japan OSU Radiation Center, ONDO Grant University of Oregon CDM Smith
Project Users 2066 Loveland 2067 Reese 2068 XU 2069 Scaillet 2070 Lowell 2071 Gallet Table Vl.2 (continued) Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description Oregon State Ce Tracer Production of Ce tracer. University Oregon State Neutron Radiography of Long-Term Use of neutron radiography and omography University Concrete Curing imaging in long-term studies of concrete curing used in civil construction. Use of fission-track analysis to determine U Tongji University Apatite/zircon fission-track irradiation content and fission track age constrains low-temperature cooling and exhumation in South China. INSU-CNRS-Ar/Ar dating of geologic samples Ari Ar analysis for age dating of geologic samples Universite d'Orleans (solid rock chips and minerals) The purpose of this experiment is to determine what color a nearly colorless Tourmaline will turn with dosages of 5, 10 and 20 Mr of Gamma irradiation. Two Pakistan Beryl crystals are also part of this experiment to see the color change as well as 2 pieces of Four Peaks Amethyst that may Gamma irradiation induced change of have been faded by sunlight. For the Tourmaline, Colorado Gem and color possibilities are brown, yellow, and pink Mineral Co. color in Tourmaline from a Pegmatite in to red. The commercial value of colorless gem the Oban Massif, Nigeria Tourmaline is very low, but other colors of gem Tourmaline, especially pink and red results, would stimulate mining of this material in Nigeria. 20 Mr is usually a dosage that will saturate the visible color, and lower dosages may be preferable ifthe Gamma rays cause a new color other than pink or red which is the desirable result. Geoazur Geoazur Ar/ Ar dating Geoazur Ar/ Ar dating. Funding Oregon State University CCE INSU-CNRS-Universite d'Orleans Colorado Gema and Mineral Co.
Project Users 2072 Buckner 2073 Schwendeman 2074 Mine 2075 Berns 2076 Helferty Table Vl.2 (continued) Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description We will be receiving shipments of dried blood spot cards with bovine blood containing a chemical compound from South Africa in the near future. The USDA-APHIS are requiring us to gamma Trypanosoma Methionly-tRNA irradiate the samples before they will be released University of to our lab at the University of Washington (Se-Washington synthetase inhibitor development to treat attle, WA). We need to conduct a test to determine neglected tropical diseases. ifthe gamma irradiation, 6 Mrad (60 kGy), will degrade the chemical compound in the samples. The sample will be a dried blood spot card spotted with bovine blood (US origin) with our chemical compound sent from our lab (Seattle, WA). This project focuses on the controlled release delivery of leuprolide from poly(lacticco-glycolic acid) microspheres. Leuprolide is remotely loaded The Biointerfaces PLGA microspheres into preformed microspheres via peptide absorp-lnstitute tion due to interactions between cationic peptides and PLGA. The goal of this study is to use remote loading to achieve high peptide encapsulation and continuous peptide release with low initial burst. Oregon State Market Exchange in Ancient Oaxaca, I NAA of archaeological ceramics from the Valley University Mexico of Oaxaca, Mexico, to trace the origins of market exchange. Trichloroethylene can diffuse into low permeabil-ity materials such as clays. When there is a change Biogeochemical Processes that Control in chemical gradient, TCE can "back diffuse" Unjversity of Texas Natural Attenuation ofTCE in Low out of the clay into higher permeability materials Permeability Zones (such as sand) and be transported through the sub-surface. This project focuses on the biogeochemi-cal interactions influencing the back diffusion of trichloroethylene at a sand-clay interface. Transition metal irradiation It's an experiment in how Frankel vacancy pairs in dissimiliar joining of transition elements behave. Funding The Biointerfaces lnstitute NSF University of Texas
O"I I...... -...J l>
- l
- l c::
Ql
- 0
([) "'C 0
- 4.
Project 2077 2078 2079 2080 2081 2082 2083 2084 2085 Users Weber Qu Albert Nation Mine Reese Nadel Nadel He Table Vl.2 (continued) Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description This project aims to determine the contribu-tions of biotic and abiotic mechanisms involved with nitrate driven uranium oxidation in natural Uniersity of Nebraska-Nitrate Mediated Uranium Mobilization sediments. Experiments will be conducted using in the High Plains Aquifer, Central up-flow columns packed with gamma sterilized Lincoln Nebraska and non-sterilized aquifer sediments (from central Nebraska) to determine the rate and contributions of abiotic and biotic uranium oxidation mecha-nisms. Daikin America Inc. Irradiation of PTFE powder mixed with Different levels of irradiation of PTFE powder modifier with different modifiers. Oregon State Soil Geochemistry of Playa Lakes INAA to determine geochemical composition of University soils around playa lakes of E. Oregon. Oregon State Trace-element Geochemistry of Belizean JNAA to determine traceelement geochemistry of speleothems from caves in Belize used as Mayan University Speleotbems ritual sites. Oregon State Standard Test Method for Antimony Round-robin to demonstrate utility of CNAA for University Content in Plastics characterizing antimony content in plastics. Oregon State Production of radioactive sources for the purpose Sources for Detector Evaluation University of testing radiation detection systems. Charlotte Pipe and ABS Antimony Testing Testing for trace antimony in ABS via INAA Foundry Co. according to ASTM E3063. Charlotte Pipe and ABS Antimony Testing Testing for trace antimony in ABS compounds via Foundry Co. lNAA according to ASTM E3063. Lanzhou University Apatite fission track Use offission track analysis to determine U content in the sedimentation ofXining Basin. Funding University of Nebraska-Lincoln Daikin America lnc. Oregon State University DNDO Grant Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Co. Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Co. Lanzhou University
CJ) I...... -....J )>
- J
- J c:
CJ
- c ro "O
0
- +
Project .2086 2087 2088 2089 2090 Users Pounders Hecht Dai Yang Duddleston Table Vl.2 (continued) Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description The goal of this project is to induce mutations in seeds and dormant cuttings of commercially important landscape plants produced by the horti-cultural industry. Based on results by the principle researcher and published literature, it is anticipated Lnnovative Plants LLC Mutation lnduction by Radiation in radiation induced changes to the genome and Asexually Propagated Landscape Plants cell cytoplasm of treated material may include improved environmental tolerance and/or morpho-logical changes of horticultural irn portance such as flower color, leaf color, dwarfness, branching etc. Identified mutations of commercial value will be asexually propagated by participating nurseries. Full spectrum irradiation of CaF2 crystals to UNM Calcuim Fluoride dosimetry studies determine changes in optical properties due to neutron exposure. Baseing on the lowtemperature China University of Tibetan Plateau Lhasa-Qiangtang terrane thermocbronological dating and modeling, the Geosciences thermochronological survey project want to explore the plateau uplift and exhumation amounts, and prospecting significance of mineral deposits. Oregon State Irradiation of Material for check sources lrradiation of different materials to make check University sources for detector characterization. This funding is intended to build a collaborative effort between faculty and students in biological sciences, chemistry, and engineering, investigate the diversity and capability of marine Biodegradation of crude oil in arctic microbial communities to degrade oil constituents University of Alaska waters and development of dynamic and respond to chemical remediation tools. We bioremediation responses will use this information to develop innovative ap-proaches (e.g. prescriptive microbial applications and methods, models of response and degradation, rapid monitoring strategies) for appropriate oil spill response in arctic waters. Funding lnnovative Plants LLC China University of Geosciences NSE University of Alaska
(j) I...... -...J )>
- J
- J c
OJ Project 2091 2092 2094 2097 Users Dolan Jianaiqng Sathuvalli Boyt Table Vl.2 (continued) Listing of Major Research and Service Projects Preformed or in Progress at the Radiation Center and Their Funding Agencies Organization Name Project Title Description Tumor cells which successfully present antigen will result in the activation of tumor-specific The Role of Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-CDS T cell responses. In order to measure T cell Department of responses in vitro without the confounding effects Biomedical Sciences Like Molecules in Direct Antigen of tumor cell growth, we will irradiate tumor Presentation cells with gamma irradiation which will arrest the growth of the cell line and allowing only T cells to proliferate if antigen presentation was successful. Northwest University Fission Track Dating ofQaidam Basin Fission track dating ofQaidam Basin, China to determine its age. Cytoplasmic male sterility (male sterility caused by mitochondria and/or chloroplasts) poses a major barrier to crossing many potato varieties in a potato breeding program. One possible tool OSU Crop and Soil Use of Somatic Cybridization to Remove to eliminate cytoplasmic male sterility is somatic Science Barrier Cytosplasmic Male Sterility cybridization, where protoplasts of male-sterile clones with important genes are fused with proto-plasts of cytoplasm donors (protoplasts with cyto-plasmic elements that are known to promote male fertility, and that have had their nuclear genome destroyed using gamma radiation). Project is designed to irradiate liquid donor bovine serum contained in vinyl bags to a minimum level Boyt Veterinary Lab Donor Bovine Serum Irradiation of25 kGy to inactivate any adventitious agents that may be present in 0.2 um sterile filtered product. Funding Department of Biomedical Sciences OSU Crop and Soil Science Boyt Veterinary Lab
Work 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Figure Vl.1 Summary of the Types of Radiological Instrumentation Calibrated to Support the OSU TRIGA Reactor and Radiation Center 43 29 19 7 3 2 Alpha GM ION Micro Personal Air Detecto rs Detectors Chambers Meters Dosimeters Samplers Table Vl.3 Summary of Radiological Instrumentation Calibrated to Support OSU Departments OSUDepartment Number of Calibrations E.M.T. Radiation Safety Office 15 Veterinary Medicine 4 Total 20 16-17 Annual Report
Table Vl.4 Summary of Radiological Instrumentation Calibrated to Su ort Other A encies Agency Number of Calibrations Clair Company Clatskanie RFD Columbia Memorial Hospital Columbia Steel Casting 4 Doug Evans, DVM 2 ESCO Corporation 2 Fire Marsball/Hazmat 89 Grand Ronde Hospital 5 Health Division 68 Hollingsworth & Vose Knife River 2 NETL, Albany 4 Occupational Health Lab 7 ODOT 5 Oregon Health and Sciences University 35 PSU 20 Republic Services Salem Hospital 5 Samaritan Health 31 Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue 6 Weyerhaeuser Total 291 16-17 Annual Report Work
-Words Publications Amro, B.M.S.; C.J. Lister, E.A. McCutchan, W. Loveland, P. Chowdhury, S. Zhu, A.D. Ayangeakaa, J.S. Barrett, M.P. Carpenter, C.J. Chiara, J.P. Greene, J.L. Harker, R.V.F. Janssens, T. Lauritsen, A.A. Sonzogni, W.B. Walters and R. Yanez. (2017). y -ray Spectroscopy of209Tl. Physical Review C, 95, 014330. Carrapa, B., Robert, X., Decelles, P., Orme, D., Thomson, S., & Schoenbohm, L. (2016). Asymmetric exhumation of the Mount Everest region: Implications for the tectono-topographic evolution of the Himalaya. Geology, 44, 611-614. doi:I0.1130/G37756.I Casperson, R.J.; D. M. Asner, J. Baker, R. G. Baker, J. S.Barrett, N. S. Bowden, C. Brune, J. Bundgaard, E. Burgett, D. A. Cebra, T. Classen, M. Cunningham, J. Deaven, D. L. Duke, I. Ferguson, J. Gearhart, V. Geppert-Kleinrath, U. Greife, S. Grimes, E. Guardincerri, U. Hager, C. Hagmann, M. Heffner, D. Hensle, N. Hertel, D. Higgins, T. Hill, D. Isenhower, J. King, J. L. Klay, N. Kornilov, R. Kudo, A. B. Laptev, W. Loveland, M. Lynch, S. Lynn, J. A. Magee, B. Manning, T. N. Massey, C. McGrath, R. Meharchand, M. P. Mendenhall, L. Montoya, N. Pickle, H. Qu, J. Ruz, S. Sangiorgio, K. T. Schmitt, B. Seilhan, S. Sharma, L. Snyder, S. Stave, A. Tate, G. Tatishvili, R.T. Thornton, F. Tovesson, D. Towell, R. S. Towell, N. Walsh, S. Watson, B. Wendt, L. Wood, L. Yao, and W. Younes. (n.d.). Measurement of the normalized 238U(n,f)/235U(n,t) cross section ratio from threshold to 30 MeV with the fission Time Projection Chamber. Physical Review C (submitted). Castelluccio, A., Andreucci, B., Jankowski, L., Mazzoli, S., Szaniawski, R., & Zattin, M. (2016). Building and exhumation of the Western Carpathians: new constraints from sequentially restored, balanced cross-sections and low-temperature thermochronometry. Tectonics, 35, 2698-2733. DeLucia, M., Guenthner, W., Marshak, S., Thomson, S., & Ault, A. (2017). Thermochronology links denudation of the Great Unconformity surface to the supercontinent cycle and snowball Earth. Geology (submitted). Fitzgerald, P. G., Malusa, M. G., & Munoz, J. A. (2018). Detrital thermochronology using conglomerates and cobbles (Chapter 16). In M. G. Malusa, & P. G. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Fission track thermochronology and its application to geology (accepted). Springer. Hansman, R., Ring, U., Thomson, S., den Brok, B., & SUibner, K. (2017). Late Eocene to Miocene uplift of the Al Hajar Mountains, Oman, recorded by fission track and (U-Th)/He thermochronology. Tectonics (accepted, in revision). Heberer, B.; Reverman, R.L.; Fellin, M.G.; Neubauer, F.; Dunkl, I.; Zattin, M.; Seward, D.; Genser, J. ; Brack, P. (2017). Postcollisional cooling history of the Eastern and Southern Alps and its linkage to Adria indentation. International Journal of Earth Science, 106, 1557-1580. Heberer, B; Reverman, R L; Fellin, MG; Neubauer, F; Dunkl, I; Zattin, M; Seward, D; Brack, P; Genser, J. (2016). Postcollisional cooling history of the Eastern and Southern Alps and its linkage to Adria indentation. International Journal of Earth Sciences. doi: 10.1007/s00531-016-1367-3 Jiao, R., Herman, F., & Seward, D. (2017). Late Cenozoic exhumation of New Zealand: impacts from Tectonics and climate. Earth Science Reviews. doi: I 0.1016/j.earscirev.2017.01.003 Lithow, J., Kamp, P. J., Musaka, S. B., Kleber, M., Lister, F., Gohl, K., & Spiegel, C. (2016). Exhumation history of the Amundsen Sea sector, West Antarctica, revealed by low-temperature thermochronology. Tectonics. doi: I 0.1002/20 l 6TC004236 16-17 Annual Report
Lossada, A; Giambiagi, L; Hoke, G; Fitzgerald, PG; Creixell, C; Murillo, I; Mardonez, D; Velasquez, R; Suriano, J. (n.d.). The late Eocene constructional phase in the Andes at 30°S: evidence from thermochronology. Tectonics (in revision after review). Loveland, W. (2016). Characterizing the mechanism(s) of heavy element synthesis reactions. EPJA Web of Conferences, 131, 04003. Loveland, W. (2016). High Quality Actinide Targets. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 307, 1591. Loveland, W., & King, J. (n.d.). Total kinetic energy release in the fast neutron induced fission of232Th and 235U. Proceedings of the Sanibel Island Conference (accepted). Loveland, W., & Yao, L. (n.d.). Survival mediated heavy element capture cross sections. Fusion 17 Proceedings (accepted). Loveland, W., Morrisey, D. J., & Seaborg, G. T. (2017). Modern Nuclear Chemistry (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. Malusa, M. G., & Fitzgerald, P. G. (2018). Application of thermochronology to geologic problems: Approaches and conceptual models (Chapter I 0). In M. G. Malusa, & P. G. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Fission track thermochronology and its application to geology (accepted). Springer. Malusa, M. G., & Fitzgerald, P. G. (2018). From cooling to exhumation: setting the reference frame for the interpretation ofthermochronologic data (Chapter 8). In M. G. Malusa, & P. G. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Fission track thermochronology and its application to geology (accepted). Springer. Mulhern, J. S., & Johnson, C. L. (2017). Time-space variability ofparalic strata deposited in a high accommodation, high sediment supply setting: example from the Cretaceous of Utah. Geological I Society, London, Special Publications, 444(1), 349-392. Perotti, M., Andreucci, B., Talarico, F., Zattin, M., & Langone, A. (2017). Multi analytical provenance analysis of Eastern Ross Sea LGM till sediments (Antarctica): petrography, geochronology and thermochronology detrital data. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 18, 2275-2304. Words Piotraschke, R., Cashman, S. M., Furlong, K., Kamp, P. J., Danisik, M., & Ganqing, X. (2015). Unroofing the Klamaths - blame it on Siletzia. Lithosphere. doi: 10.1130/L418.1 Ring, U., Gessner, K., & Thomson, S. (2017). South Men deres Monocline: low temperature thermochronology constrains role of crustal extension in structural evolution of southwest Turkey. Tectonophysics, 712-713, 455-463. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.06.019 Ring, U., Gessner, K., Thomson, S., & Markwitz, V. (2017). Variations in fault-slip data and cooling history reveal corridor of heterogenous backarc extension in the eastern Aegean Sea region. Tectonophysics, 700-701, I 08-130. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.02.013 Ring, U., Uysal, T., Glodny, J., Cox, S., Little, T., Thomson, S., & Stiibner, K. (2017). Fault-gouge dating in the Southern Alps, New Zealand. Tectonophysics (in press). Sagar, M. W., Browne, G. H., Seward, D., Bland, K. J., & Strogen, D. P. (2017). Refined depositional history and dating of the Tongaporutuan reference section, north 1 Taranki, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics (submitted). Savignano, E., Mazzoli, S., Arce, M., Franchini, M., Gautheron, C., Paolini, M., & Zattin, M. (2016). (Un)Coupled thrust belt-foreland deformation in the northern Patagonian Andes: new insights from the Esqual-Gastre sector ( 41 °30'-43° S). Tectonics, 35, 2636-2656. Schito, A. ; Andreucci, B.; Aldega, L.; Corrado, S.; Di Paolo, L.; Zattin, M.; Szaniawski, R.; Janikowski, L.; Mazzoli, S. (2017). Burial and exhumation of the western border of the Ukrainian Shield (Podolia). Basin Research, 1-18. Snyder, L.; B. Manning, N.S. Bowden, J. Bundgaard, R. Casperson, D.A. Cebra, T. Classen, J. Gearhart, U. Greife, C. Hagemann, M. Hefner, D. Hensle, D. Higgins, D. Isenhower, J. King, J.L. Klay, W. Loveland, J.A. Magee, M.P. Mendenhall, S. Sangiorgio, B. Seilhan, F. Tovesson, R.S. Towell, S. Watson, L. Yao, and W. Younes. (n.d.). Performance of a MICROMEGAS-based TPC in a high-flux high-energy neutron beam. Nuclear Instruments and Methods A (submitted). 16-17 Annual Report
Words Spiegel, C; Lindow, J; Kamp, P J. J; Meisel, O; Musaka, S; Lisker, F; Kuhn, G; Gohl, K. (2015). Tectonomorphic evolution of Marie Byrd Land - Implications for Cenozoic rifting activity and onset of West Antarctic glaciation. Global and Planetary Change. doi: I 0.1Ol6/j.glopacha.2016.08.013 Tang, D; Wilson, CJ W; Sewell, R; Seward, D; Chan, LS; Ireland, TR; Wooden, J L. (2017). Tracking the evolution of late Mesozoic arc-related magmatic systems in Hong Kong using in-situ U-Pb dating and trace element analyses in zircons. American Mineralogist (in press). Thomson, S. (2016). Fission Track Analysis. In W. White (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Geochemistry: A Comprehensive Reference Source on the Chemistry of the Earth. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007 /978-3-319-39193-9 _ 290-1 Vonta, N.; Souliotis, GA; Loveland, W; Kwon, Y K; Tshoo, K; Jeong, SC; Veselsky, M; Bonasera, A; Botvina, A;. (2016). Neutron-rich rare-isotope production from projectile fission of heavy nuclei near 20 MeV/nucleon beam energy. Physical Review C, 94, 064611. Wang, X., Song, C., Zattin, M., He, P., Song, A., Li, J., & Wang, Q. (2016). Cenozoic pulsed deformation history of northeastern Tibetan Plateau reconstructed from fission-track thermochronology. Tectonophysics, 672, 212-227. Warren-Smith, E., Lamb, S., Seward, D., Smith, E., Hermann, F., & Stem, T. (2016). Thermochronological evidence of a low-angle, mid-crustal detachment plane beneath the central South Island, New Zealand. Gcubed. doi: I 0.1002/20 I 6GC006402 Welsh, T.; W. Loveland, R. Yanez, J.S. Barrett, E. A. Mccutchan, A. A. Sonzogni, T. Johnson, S. Zhu, J.P. Greene, A.D. Ayangekaa, M.P. Carpenter, T. Lauritsen, J.L. Harker, W. B. Walters, B.A. Amro, and P. Copp. (2017). Modeling Multi-Nucleon Transfer in Symmetric Collisions of Massive Nuclei. Physics Letters B, 779, 119. Yang, R., Seward, D., Zhou, Z., & Dumitru, T. (2017). U-Pb detrital zircon ages from the Changjiang (Yangtze River) - a test for provenance studies. Basin Research (submitted). Zattin, M., Andreucci, B., De Toffoli, B., Grigo, D., & Tsikalas, F. (2016). Thermochronological constraints to late Cenozoic exhumation of the Barents Sea Shelf. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 73, 97-104. Presentations Anderson, R. B., Long, S. P., Thomson, S. N., Calle, A. Z., Horton, B. K., & Stock Ii, D. F. (2017). Deformation history and wedge dynamics in the central Andean retroarc of southern Bolivia (- 21 °S): Insights from apatite (U-Th)/He, apatite fission track, and zircon (U-Th)/He ages. Abstracts with Programs. Geological Society of America. Balestrieri, M., Olivetti, V., Pace, D., Rossetti, F., Talarico, F., & Zattin, M. (18-23 September 20 16). Interplays between the West and the East Antarctica ice sheets: hints from bedrock and detrital thermochronology and other technique. Maresias, Brazil: 15th International Conference on Thermochronology. Betka, P. M., Thomson, S. N., Seeber, L., Steckler, M. S., Zoramthara, C., & Sincavage, R. (2016). The Indo-Burma Ranges: Eocene-Pliocene coevolution of the paleo-Brahmaputra ftuvial-deltaic system and lndo-Burma accretionary prism. Eos Transactions AGU (T22A-06). AGU Fall Meeting. Betka, P., Seeber, L., Buck, W., Steckler, M., Thomson, S., Sincavage, R., & Zoramthara, C. (2017). Mechanical stratification during the extreme sediment accretion in the Indo-Burman Ranges: geological and theoretical constraints on the megathrust geometry. Eos Transactions AGU. AGU Fall Meeting. Brombin, V., Webb, L., Bonadirnan, C., Marzoli, A., & Coltorti, M. (2017). A geochronological study of mafic and acidic lavas from Veneto Volcanic province (North-East Italy). Geophysical Research Abstracts, 19 (EGU2017-6410). Vienna, Austria: EGU General Assembly 2017. Darin, M. & the CD-CAT [Continental Dynamics - Central Anatolia Tectonics] Team. (2017). Geodynamic Evolution of Subduction to Collision to Escape in Central Anatolia from Surface to Mantle - Results from the CD-CAT Project. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 19 (EGU2017-18120). 16-17 Annual Report
Darin, M. H., Umhoefer, P. J., Thomson, S. N., & Lefebvre, C. (2016). Orogen-parallel variations in structural style and tectonic exhumation during the Miocene collision-escape transition in Anatolia. Abstracts with Programs. 48:7. Geological Society of America. doi: 10.1130/abs/20 l 6AM-283585 Darin, M., Umhoefer, P., Thomson, S., & Schleiffarth, W. K. (2017). Late Eocene inversion and exhumation of the Sivas basin (central Anatolia) based on low-temperature thermochronometry: implications for diachronous initiation of Arabia-Eurasia collision. Eos Transactions AGU. AGU Fall Meeting. Gass, E.; E.A. McCutchan, A.A. Sonzogni, J.S. Barrett, W. Loveland, R. Yanez, S. Zhu, A.O. Ayangeakaa, M.P. Carpenter, J.P. Greene, R. V. F. Janssens, T. Lauritsen, C.J. Chiara, J.L. Harker, and W.B. Walters. (14 October 2016). Nuclear structure studies of202Hg and 203Tl using deep-inelastic collisions. Vancouver, BC: APS DNP Meeting. Fitzgerald, P. G. (2016). How did North America's highest mountains form? Department of Geological Sciences seminar series. Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury. Fitzgerald, P. G. (2016). Long-term erosion rates and uplift: Thermochronology applied to Tectonics. Christchurch, New Zealand: Department of Geological Sciences, University of Canterbury. Guenthner, WR; DeLucia, M S; Marshak, S; Reiners, P W; Drake, H; Thomson, SN; Ault, AK; Tillberg, M. (2017). Zircon (U-Th)/He data reveals deep-time thermal histories of cratons and the Great Unconformity surface. Abstracts with Programs. Geological Society of America. Guenthner, W.R.; DeLucia, M.S.; Marshak, S.; Reiners, P.W.; Drake, H.; Thomson, S.N.; Ault, A.K.; Tillberg, M. (2017). Radiation damage-He diffusivity models applied to deep-time thermochronology: Zircon and titanite (U-Th)/He datasets from cratonic settings. I Eos Transactions AGU. AGU Fall Meeting. I Hansman, R., Ring, U., Thomson, S. N., Albert, R., Gerdes, A., den Brok, B., & Sttibner, K. (2017). Late Eocene uplift of the Al Hajar Mountains, Oman, recorded by low-temperature thermochronology and absolute ages of brittle structures by U-Pb dating of calcite fibers. Abstracts with Programs. Geological Society of America. Words Hansman, R., Ring, U., Thomson, S. N., den Brok, B., Reiners, P. W., & Sttibner, K. (2016). Constraining the uplift history of the Jabal Akhdar and Saih Hatat Culminations, Al Hajar Mountains, Oman, with fission track and (U-Th)/He ages. Eos Transactions AGU (EP53B-0940). AGU Fall Meeting. Heberer, B; Reverman, R L; Fellin, MG; Neubauer, F; Dunk], I; Zattin, M; Seward, D; Brack, P; Genser, J. (2016). Postcollisional cooling history of the Eastern and Southern Alps and its linkage to Adria indentation. Vienna: EGU. Jlao, R., Herman, F., & Seward, D. (2016). Late Cenozoic exhumation of New Zealand: inversion from bedrock thermochronological ages. Vienna: EGU. Lossada, AC; Mard6nez, D; Suriano, J; Hoke, GD; Fitzgerald, PG; Mahoney, JD; Giambiagi, L; Aragon, E. (14-18 December 2015). Uplift sequence of the main morphostructural units of the south central Andes at 30°S: Insights from a multidisciplinary approach. (T23A-293 l ). San Francisco, CA: American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting. Loveland, W. (19 July 2016). Multi-Nucleon Transfer Reactions: Pathways to new Neutron-Rich Heavy Nuclei. Vancouver, BC: EMMA Symposium, TRlUMF. Loveland, W. (April 2017). Total kinetic energy release and fission product mass distributions for the fast neutron induced fission of232Th, 233U, 235U, and 239Pu. San Francisco: 253rd ACS National Meeting. Loveland, W. (April 2017). Total kinetic energy release in fission. Naperville, IL: SSAA Symposium. Loveland, W. (February 2017). Survival mediated heavy element capture cross sections. Hobart, Tasmania: FUSION17. Loveland, W. (June 2016). Characterizing the mechanism(s) of heavy element synthesis reactions. Lund, Sweden: Proceedings of the l 60th Nobel Symposium. Loveland, W. (March 2017). Target Preparation. Livermore, CA: TPC Meeting. Loveland, W. (May 2016). Fission Product Yields and Nuclear Forensics. Corvallis, OR: OSU Nuclear Forensics Program. 16-17 Annual Report
Words Loveland, W., & Yanez, R. (14 October 2016). Total Kinetic Energy Release in the Fast Neutron Induced Fission of235U. Vancouver, BC: APS DNP Meeting. Mazzoli, S., Castelluccio, A., Andreucci, B., Jankowski, L., Ketcham, R., Szaniawski, R., & Zattin, M. (23-28 April 2017). The Western Carpathians fold and thrust belt and its relationships with the inner zone of the orogen: constraints from sequentially restored, balanced cross-sections integrated with low-temperature thermochronometry. Wien: EGU General Assembly. McCaleb, K., Yanez, R., & Loveland, W. ( 15 October 2016). Tests of Multi-Nucleon Transfer Models Using Gamma Ray Spectroscopy. Vancouver, BC: APS DNP Meeting. McDennott, R. G., Ault, A. K., Caine, P. W., Reiners, P. W., & Thomson, S. N. (2017). Abstracts with Programs. Geological Society of America. Murray, K. E., Reiners, P. W., Robert, X., Thomson, S. N., & Whipple, K. X. (2016). Oligocene rock cooling of the north-central Colorado Plateau region: Erosion or a variable geothennal gradient? Abstracts with Programs. 48:7. Geological Society of America. doi: I 0.1130/abs/20 l 6AM-286613 Oesterle, J., Seward, D., Little, T., & Stockli, D. (2016). Dating an actively exhuming metamorphic core complex, the Suckling Dayman Massif in SE Papua New Guinea. San Francisco: AGU. Oesterle, J., Seward, D., Little, T., Norton, K., & Stockli, D. (2016). Dating an actively exhuming metamorphic core complex, the Suckling Dayman Massif in SE Papua New Guinea. Brazil: international Thennochronology Conference. Perotti, M., Andreucci, B., Talarico, F., & Zattin, M. (12-16 December 2016). Detrital thennochronology, geochronology and petrography of the LGM Eastern Ross Sea (Antarctica), with implications for tectonic evolution of Marie Byrd Land. San Francisco, CA: AGU Fall Meeting. Pidgeon, E. (n.d.). Geochronology and microstructures of the Tillotson peak complex in Lowell, Vennont. The Green Mountain Geologist 6. 44(1-2). Vermont Geological Society Spring Meeting. Ring, U., Thomson, S. N., & Gessner, K. (2017). Thennochronology across tectonic contacts in southwest Turkey defines extensional South Menderes Monocline. Geophysical Research Abstracts. 19. EGU. Sagar, M. W., Seward, D., & Norton, K. P. (2016). Thennochronology, Uplift, and Erosion at the Australian-Pacific Plate Boundary Alpine Fault "Big Bend", New Zealand. San Francisco: AGU. Savignano, E., Mazzoli, S., Zattin, M., Franchini, M., & Gautheron, C. (18-23 September 2016). Apatite (U-Th)/He thennochronometry in the Northern Patagonian Andes: new insights into the exhumation history of the thrust belt foreland sector. Maresias, Brazil: 15th International Conference on Thennochronology. Savignano, E., Mazzoli, S., Zattin, M., Gautheron, C., & Franchini, M. (23-28 April 2017). Uncoupled vs. coupled thrust belt-foreland deformation: a model for nothern Patagonia inferred from U-Th/He and apatite fission track dating. Wien: EGU General Assembly. Savignano, E., Mazzoli, S., Zattin, M., Gautheron, C., & Franchini, M. (7-9 September 2016). Uncoupled vs. coupled thrust belt-foreland defonnation: a model for Northern Patagonia inferred from U-Th/He dating. Naples, Italy: 88th Meeting of the ltalian Geological Society. Sullivan, P. (n.d.). Characterizing pseudotachylyte veins in the Arrowhead Thrust fault zone, Vennont. The Green Mountain Geologist 6. 44(1-2). Vennont Geological Society Spring Meeting. Thomson, S. N., Lefebvre, C., Umhoefer, P. J., Darin, M. H., Whitney, D. L., & Teyssier, C. (2016). Late Cenozoic thermochronology and exhumation history of central Anatolia: Implications for the timing and nature of transition from collision to escape tectonics. Eos Transactions AGU (T53B-04). AGU Fall Meeting. Thomson, S. N., Soreghan, G. S., Reiners, P. W., Peyton, S. L., & Murray, K. E. (2016). A definitive 6 Ma start date for carving of the Northeastern Colorado Plateau Canyonlands. Abstracts with Programs. 48:7. Geological Society of America. doi: 10.1130/ abs/20 l 6AM-287583 16-17 Annual Report
Tsai, C.-H., Liu, C., Webb, L., & Keyser, W. (2016). New P-T and Geochronological Constraints on High-Pressure Garnet-Bearing Paragonite-Epidote Amphibolite in the Yuli Belt, Eastern Taiwan. Yokohama, Japan: Goldschmidt Conference. Walker, K. L., Carrapa, B., Thomson, S. N., & Stevens, A. L. (2016). Climatic and tectonic control on erosion across the alpine fault, South Island, New Zealand. Abstracts with Programs. 48:7. Geological Society of America. doi: 10.1130/abs/2016AM-2804 l 0 Webb, L. (October 2016). Structural and isotopic constraints I I I I on the development of a major Phanerozoic intraplate fault zone. Invited lecture, University of Iowa. Whitney, D. L., Meijers, M. J., Lefebvre, C., Cosca, M.A., Thomson, S. N., & Mulch, A. (2016). Tracking Anatolian Lithosphere Evolution with "Tectonochemistry". Goldschmidt Conference Abstracts, 3409. Whitney, D.L. and the CD-CAT Team. (2017). Mantle to surface dynamics across subduction-collision transitions in space and time: results from the CD-CAT project in Anatolia. Eos Transactions AGU. AGU Fall Meeting. 'Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Le, M. N., lndra, G., Indra, A., Xie, J., & Gombart, A. F. (28-31 March, 2017). Local sustained delivery of 1 a, 25(0H)2D3 by nanofiber wound dressings induces human cathelidicin antimicrobial peptide expression both in vitro and in vivo. Orlando, FL: 20th Workshop on Vitamin D. Students Aiken, Cheyne. MS student, University of Vermont. "Exhumation of the Tillotson Peak Complex in I Northern Vermont." (Advisor L. Webb). (Anderson, Ryan. PhD student, Washington State University. I " Deformation history and wedge dynamics in the I central Andean retroarc of southern Bolivia (- 21 °S): Insights from apatite (U-Th)/He, apatite fission track, and zircon (U-Th)/He ages." (Advisor S. Long). !Barrett, J.S. PhD (2016), Oregon State University. "Multinucleon Transfer in l 36Xe + 208Pb." (Advisor W. Loveland). Words Beaudoin, A. PhD (2017), lnstitut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orleans. " Relations deformation-age 40Ar/39Ar. Application aux processus de localisation de la deformation dans Jes detachements cristaux." (Advisors S. Scaillet and L. Jolivet). Bessiere, E. PhD student, lnstitut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orleans. "Alboran - Betiques - Rif - reconstruction et modelisation, terrain dans les zones internes." (Advisors R. Augier and L. Joli vet). Bezard, M. MS (2017), Institut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orleans. "Structural geology coupled with Raman geothermometry and 39Ar/40Ar dating in the South of the Menderes Massif, Turkey." (Advisors Y. Roche and S. Scaillet). Cordova, Jeremy. MS student, Western Washington University. " Pressure-temperature-time evolution of the Easton terrane, North Cascades, Washington State: the record of subduction initiation." (Advisors L. Schermer and S. Mulcahy). Darin, Michael. PhD student, Northern Arizona University. " Late Eocene inversion and exhumation of the Sivas basin (central Anatolia) based on low-temperature thermochronometry: implications for diachronous initiation of Arabia-Eurasia collision." (Advisor P. Umhoefer). DeLucia, Michael. PhD student, University of Illinois. "Thermochronology links denudation of the Great Unconformity surface to the supercontinent cycle and snowball Earth." (Advisor W. Guenthner). DeReuil, Aubrey. PhD candidate, University of Utah. " Bentonite dating of the Lower Mancos Shale." (Advisor L. Birgenheier). Franceschini, Z. MS student, lnstitut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orleans. (Advisors S. Scaillet, G. Corti, and R. Cioni). Han, Xu. BS student, China University of Geosciences (Beijing). "The sedimentary process and exhumation history of Upper Cretaceous Jingzhushan Formation, northwestern Lhasa terrane: Constraints from basin analysis and detrital thermochronology." (Advisor J. Dai). Hansman, Reuben. PhD student, University of Stockholm. "Constraining the uplift history of the Jabal Akhdar and Saih Hatat Culminations, Al Hajar Mountains, Oman, with fission track and (U-Th)/He ages." (Advisor U. Ring). 16-17 Annual Report
~=
=---=-- =:;::.:.;;-=:=:==
L...!ords ~ Hines, Ben. PhD student. "Cretaceous-Paleogene palinspastic reconstruction of the east coast basin, New Zealand." (Advisor D. Seward). Jensen, Jordan. MS student, University of Arizona. "Age and origin ofSturtian (Neoproterozoic) basement-hosted elastic injectites, Colorado, USA." (Advisor P. Reiners). Jewison, E. PhD student, lnstitut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orleans. "Evolution structural et thermique des Caledonides d'Ecosse." (Advisors N. Bellahsen and S. Scaillet). King, J. PhD student, Oregon State University. "TKE release in 232Th(n,t)." (Advisor W. Loveland). Laurent, V. PhD (2017), lnstitut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orleans. "Localisation de la deformation au sein de zones de cisaillement haute-pression basse-temperature et enregistrement isotopique 40Ar/39Ar." (Advisors S. Scaillet and L. Jolivet). Li, Xia. PhD student, University of Padova. "From bedrock to sediments: insights on Ross Sea ice-flow dynamics inferred from detrital data." (Advisor Prof. M. Zattin). McCaleb, K. MS (2017), Oregon State University. "Multinucleon Transfer in 136Xe + 198Pt." (Advisor W. Loveland). McDermott, Rob. MS student, Utah State University. "Evolution of exhumation from multi-method thermochronometry in the eastern Kluane Ranges, Yukon, Canada." (Advisor A. Ault). Mora, N. MS (2017), lnstitut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orleans. "Interpretation des ages 39Ar/40Ar sur micas blancs et feldspaths potassiques dans le massif de Tende (Corse, France) et l'lle d' Ikaria (Cyclades, Grece)." (Advisors S. Scaillet and A. Beaudoin). Murray, Kendra. PhD student, University of Arizona. "Low-temperature thermochronology from laccolith aureoles constrains laccolith aureoles constrains late Cenozoic exhumation in the north-central Colorado Plateau." (Advisor P. Reiners). Nteme, J. PhD student, Institut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orleans. "Experimental calibration of Ar diffusion in micas. Application to high-resolution thermochronologic reconstructions." (Advisor S. Scaillet). Oerstele, Juergen. PhD student. "Timing and evolution of the Suckling-Dayman metamorphic core complex, Papua New Guinea." (Advisor D. Seward). Perotti, Matteo. PhD student, University of Siena. "The Antarctic Ice Sheets dynamics during and after the Last Glacial Maximum revealed by provenance of clasts and sand fraction in Ross embayment glacial tills." (Co-tutor Prof. M. Zattin). Pidgeon, Elizabeth. BS student (Geology), University of Vermont. "Pressure-temperature-time-deformation path of blueschists in the Tillotson peak complex, Vermont." (Advisor L. Webb). Roche, V. PhD student, lnstitut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orleans. "Role de la subduction dans la localisation de gisements geothermaux en Anatolie." (Advisors L. Jolivet and S. Scaillet). Ruohong, Jiao. PhD. "Thermo-tectonic studies of Mesozoic basement rock, North Island, New Zealand." (Advisor D. Seward). Savignano, Elisa. PhD student, University of Padova. "Investigation of the structurally-controlled Navidad mineralization (Argentina): an integrated approach." (Advisor Prof. M. Zattin). Shorten, Chili. PhD. "Thermal history, hydrocarbon potential and tectonic evolution of the Northern Appalachian Basin constrained through low-temperature thermochronology." (Advisor P. Fitzgerald). Sullivan, Patrick. BS student (Geology), University of Vermont. "Structural analysis and geochronology of pseudotachylyte in the Taconic Arrowhead Mountain thrust fault zone." (Advisor L. Webb). Tam, Evan. MS student, University of Vermont. "Role of the Prospect Rock Thrust in the exhumation of high-pressure rocks in the Tillotson Peak area, Vermont." (Advisor L. Webb). Tang, Denise. PhD student. "Aspects of the tectono-magmatic evolution of late Mesozoic magmatic systems in Hong Kong." (Advisor D. Seward). Valentino, Cole. BS (2017), Occidental College. "Low-temperature exhumation along the main central Thrust in Central Nepal: Evidence from apatite fission track thermochronology." (Advisor A. Blythe). 16-17 Annual Report
aldner, M. PhD student, Institut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orleans. " Evolution structural, thermique, rheologique de la zone axiale des Pyrenees." (Advisors N. Bellahsen and S. Scaillet). arfel, Thomas. MS. "Applying Low Temperature Thermochronology to Constrain Exhumation Patterns along the Eastern Denali Fault Corner, Alaska." (Advisor P. Fitzgerald). arren Smith, Emily. PhD student. " Lithospheric deformation in the Southern Lakes, New Zealand." (Advisor D. Seward). in, Z. PhD student, lnstitut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orleans. "A Study on the Late Paleozoic - Early Mesozoic Kinematics and Dynamics of the Southwest part of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt." (Advisors Y. Chen, M. Faure, and S. Scaillet). Yao, L. PhD student, Oregon State University. "Spin mediated survival probability." (Advisor W. Loveland). Words Yen, C. PhD student, lnstitut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orleans. "The Neoproterozoic and Early Paleozoic tectonic evolution of Western Jiangnan Orogen: Insights from field geology, structural deformation, magnetic fabric, petrological, geochronological and geochemical evidence." (Advisors Y. Chen, M. Faure, and S. Scaillet). Zheng, Chen. PhD student. "Fission track thermochronology: constraints on tectonothermal evolution of East Sichuan belt." (Advisor C. Xu). 16-17 Annual Report
Oregon State University Radiation Center, 100 Radiation Center, Corvallis, OR 96331 www.radiationcenter.oregonstate.edu
- .}}