ML17300A207

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Requests Supplemental Response to Questions B.1 & B.2 of Reg Guide 9.3,per OL Antitrust Review.Response Required within 60 Days from Ltr Date
ML17300A207
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde 
Issue date: 12/18/1985
From: Funches J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Van Brunt E
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
Shared Package
ML17300A206 List:
References
RTR-REGGD-09.003, RTR-REGGD-9.003 TAC-63969, NUDOCS 8606300456
Download: ML17300A207 (2)


Text

6 a ~

a Hn.

Edwin E.

Van BnuniJn.

Executive Vice President Arizona Nuclear Power Project P.O.

Box 52034 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034 DEC 18 RE:

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 3--Docket No. 50-530A; Updated Regulatory Guide 9.3 Information Pursuant to the Commission's Operating License Antitrust,Review.

Dear Mr. Van Brunt:

As part of its operating license antitrust review, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff analyzes changes in the applicants'ctivi.ties that have occurred since the initial antitrust review at the construction permit stage.

The responses to Regulatory Guide 9.3 submitted on October 1, 1979 by Arizona Public Service Company, including data submitted as agent for co-applicants Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Southern California Edison

Company, El Paso Electric Company and Public Service Company of New Mexico, are over six years old and will be over seven years old at'the time fuel loading is projected for Unit 3 of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.

In light of the time period that has elapsed since applicants'riginal Regulatory Guide 9.3 data response and the elapsed time since staff's review of Units 1 and 2 in 1982, staff is requesting updated data responses, for each applicant to. question B. 1 and'll subsections, as well as question B.2 of Regulatory Guide 9.3 (copy enclosed).

Your response should begin where your October 1, 1979 response.

ended and continue to the present.

Pending transactions, agreements, etc., at the time of the initial response should be brought up to date and any new developments since the '1979 response should be addressed; In responding, be as specific as possible and elaborate where appropriate.

For example:

Do not respond to a question concerning requests for power by merely giving a "yes" or a "no" response.

Elaborate with

names, dates and descriptions of the type of power request.

Follow this procedure in responding to all questions in Regulatory Guide 9.3.

(Do not respond to question B.3.)

Please provide your response within sixty (60) days of the date of this letter.

If you have any questions regarding this request, contact Milliam Lambe of my staff at (301) 492-8048.

Sincerely, Ol'i@i~<: 'Sa

c. r,nQ p.g

'G

'oJl'esse L. Funches, Director Planning and Program Analysis Staff Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 8606800486 860627 PDR ADODR 08000880 N

PDR

4