ML17222A190
| ML17222A190 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of California-Davis |
| Issue date: | 09/25/2017 |
| From: | Linh Tran NRC/NRR/DPR/PRLB |
| To: | Carter C McClellan Nuclear Research Center |
| Tran L | |
| References | |
| Download: ML17222A190 (11) | |
Text
September 25, 2017 Dr. Cameron S. Carter, M.D.
Interim Vice Chancellor for Research University of California, Davis One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616-8558
SUBJECT:
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS - RENEWAL OF FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. R-130, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DOCKET NO. 50-607
Dear Dr. Carter,
This letter is a reminder that Facility Operating License No. R-130 for the McClellan Nuclear Radiation Center (MNRC) training reactor and isotopes production, General Atomics (TRIGA) nuclear reactor, held by the Regents of the University of California, is scheduled to expire on August 13, 2018, and provides guidance for preparing your application for a renewal of the license. Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.109, Effect of timely renewal application, allows continued operation under your current license until the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) acts upon an application for renewal, provided the application is received at least 30 days prior to the expiration date of your current license.
Renewal of your facility operating license will involve the issuance of a new license. Therefore, license renewal involves detailed reviews of all documentation related to your facility, on-site NRC staff visits and reviews, and publication in the Federal Register of a notice of your request that provides the opportunity for public participation, as well as a notice of the results of our review of your application.
Your renewal application should address the requirements in applicable sections of NRC regulations and demonstrate that the reactor can continue to be operated safely and without adverse impact on the environment or the public. The NRC staff recommends that the content and format of your renewal application follows the guidance provided in NUREG-1537, Part 1, Guidelines for Preparing and Reviewing Applications for the Licensing of Non-Power Reactors, Format and Content. NUREG-1537, Part 1, can be found in the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), under Accession No. ML042430055.
In order for us to perform an adequate review, you are requested to include, as part of your application, all documentation in accordance with 10 CFR 50.33, Contents of applications; general information, and 10 CFR 50.34, Contents of applications; technical information, as follows:
C. Carter 1. Updated Safety Analysis Report An updated version of your safety analysis report (SAR) is required to be submitted with your renewal application. The updated SAR should include information that describes the facility and all changes made during the current license period; the design bases and limits on its operation; and a safety analysis of the structures, systems, and components to ensure that they will be able to continue to perform their intended functions. Also, potential and reasonable accident scenarios and their consequences should be analyzed using the best current input data and computational techniques. Information should be compared, wherever possible, with facility operating experience.
Furthermore, the updated SAR should include, if applicable, current information and analyses on demography, meteorology, geology, seismology, and other natural and man-made phenomena.
- 2. Financial Qualifications (10 CFR 50.33, Contents of applications; general information, and 10 CFR 50.75, Reporting and recordkeeping for decommissioning planning)
Financial Qualifications (10 CFR 50.33)
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.33(f)(2), Applicants to renew or extend the term of an operating license for a non-power reactor shall include the financial information that is required in an application for an initial license.
As required by paragraph (b) of 10 CFR 50.71, Maintenance of records, making of reports, the NRC staff will analyze the financial statements for the current year to determine if the applicant is financially qualified to operate the reactor. To facilitate our review, you are requested to provide the most recently published annual financial statement for the Regents of the University of California.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.33(f)(2), you are requested to provide the estimated annual operating costs for the first 5 year period after the projected license renewal, the underlying assumptions and bases of the estimate, and the source(s) of funding to cover these costs.
You are also requested to provide information to demonstrate that MNRC reactor facility continues to satisfy the definition of a class 104 facility in 10 CFR 50.21(c). That regulation states, in relevant part, that a facility useful in the conduct of research and development activities is not a facility of the type in [10 CFR] 50.22, which is a facility deemed to be for industrial or commercial purposes. Section 50.22 states, in part, that in the case of a production or utilization facility which is useful in the conduct of research and development activities of the types specified in section 31 of the Act, such facility is deemed to be for industrial or commercial purposes if the facility is to be used so that more than 50 percent of the annual cost of owning and operating the facility is devoted to the production of materials, products, or energy for sale or commercial distribution, or to the sale of services, other than research and development or education or training.
Financial Assurance for Decommissioning (10 CFR 50.75)
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.33(k), the NRC requires that an application for an operating license for a utilization facility to provide information to demonstrate how reasonable assurance will be provided that funds will be available to decommission the facility. Under 10 CFR 50.75(d), each non-power reactor applicant for or holder of an operating license shall submit a decommissioning report that contains a cost estimate for decommissioning the facility, an indication of the funding method(s) to be used to provide funding assurance for decommissioning, and a description of the means of adjusting the cost estimate and
C. Carter associated funding level periodically over the life of the facility. For the NRC staffs review, the following information is requested to be included in the renewal application:
- a. A current cost estimate to decommission the MNRC TRIGA nuclear reactor (to meet the NRCs radiological release criteria for decommissioning the facility for unrestricted use), as well as the basis for the cost estimate. Also, please provide a summary of total decommissioning costs by labor, waste disposal, other items (such as energy, equipment, and supplies), and a 25 percent contingency factor;
- b. An indication of the funding method(s) to be used to provide funds for decommissioning; and
- c. A description of the means of adjusting the cost estimate and associated funding level periodically over the life of the facility. Also, please provide a detailed numerical example updating the cost estimate.
If the Regents of the University of California intends to use a statement of intent (SOI) as the method to provide decommissioning funding assurance, as provided for by 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(iv), the NRC staff must find that the applicant is a Federal, State, or local government licensee. To make this finding, the applicant must state that it is a State government organization and that the decommissioning funding obligations of the applicant are backed by the State government, and also provide corroborating documentation. Further, the applicant must provide documentation verifying that the signatory of the SOI is authorized to execute said document that binds the applicant. This document may be a governing body resolution, management directives, or other form that provides an equivalent level of assurance. If it is the Regents of the University of Californias intent to use an SOI to provide financial assurance for decommissioning, the NRC staff requests the following information be included in the application:
- a. An updated SOI which includes the current (2018 dollars) cost estimate for decommissioning, a statement that funds for decommissioning will be obtained when necessary, and the signatorys oath or affirmation attesting to the information;
- b. Documentation that corroborates that the Regents of the University of California is a State or local government licensee under 10 CFR 50.75 (e)(1)(iv);
- c. A statement as to whether the decommissioning funding obligations for the MNRC TRIGA nuclear reactor are backed by the State of California government. The application must also present information that corroborates this statement. For example, the documentation may be a copy of or complete citation to a State statute that expressly provides that the obligations, or at least the decommissioning funding obligations, of the applicant are obligations backed or supported by the full faith and credit of the State of California, or an opinion of the applicants General Counsel with citations to statutes, regulations, and/or case law that the obligations, or at least with respect to the decommissioning funding obligations, of the applicant are obligations backed or supported by the full faith and credit of the State of California; and
- d. Documentation verifying that the signatory of the SOI is authorized to execute such a document that binds the applicant financially. For example, provide a copy of the Regents of the University of California governing board or equivalent resolution that shows that the signatory of the SOI has been authorized by the Regents of the University of California to bind it, at least with respect to funding the decommissioning of the MNRC TRIGA nuclear reactor, or provide a copy of an official Regents of the University of California delegation of authority showing that the
C. Carter signatory of the SOI is authorized to bind the Regents of the University of California financially, at least with respect to funding the decommissioning for the MNRC TRIGA nuclear reactor.
- 3. Environmental Report (10 CFR Part 51.45, Environmental Report)
The environmental report should include sufficient operational data, analyses, and discussions to provide a substantial basis for NRC to develop its environmental assessment.
- 4. Technical Specifications The content and format of technical specifications (TSs) should be developed considering the guidance in NUREG-1537, as supplemented by the American Nuclear Standards Institute, Incorporated/American Nuclear Society 15.1, The Development of Technical Specifications for Research Reactors. In addition, please ensure that each TS is supported by an analysis in the SAR. Any proposed changes to the current TSs should be described in detail, justified, and supported by its respective SAR analysis in the renewal application so these changes can be evaluated during the review.
- 5. Operator Requalification Program (10 CFR 50.54, Condition of licenses, paragraph (i-1) and 10 CFR Part 55, Operators Licenses)
The current operator requalification plan will be reviewed with your renewal application to ensure it meets current NRC requirements. Please submit a copy of your current operator requalification plan. However, if you wish to modify your approved operator requalification plan, changes should be submitted for the NRC review in accordance with the regulations cited above.
- 6. Emergency Plan (10 CFR 50.54(q) and (r), and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities)
The current emergency plan will be reviewed with your renewal application to ensure it meets current NRC requirements. Please submit a copy of your current emergency plan.
However, if you wish to modify your approved emergency plan, changes should be submitted for the NRC review in accordance with the regulations cited above.
- 7. Physical Security Plan (10 CFR 73.67, Licensee fixed site and in-transit requirements for the physical protection of special nuclear material of moderate and low strategic significance)
The current physical security plan will be reviewed with your renewal application to ensure it meets current NRC requirements. Please submit a copy of your current physical security plan. However, if you wish to modify your approved physical security plan, changes should be submitted for the NRC review in accordance with the regulations cited in 10 CFR 50.54 (p).
- 8. Filing of Application The requirements for submitting your renewal application and all other formal documentation relating to your license with respect to addressee, notarization, signatory and number of copies are given in 10 CFR 50.4, Written communications, and 10 CFR 50.30, Filing of applications for licenses; oath or affirmation. Also, information included in your renewal application that is considered sensitive or proprietary, that you seek to have withheld from the public, must be marked in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public inspections,
C. Carter exemptions, requests for withholding. Any information related to security should be submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 73.21, Protection of Safeguards Information:
Performance Requirements.
The NRC staff request that the application for renewal be submitted to the NRC Document Control Desk no less than 30 days prior to the license expiration date, and earlier if possible, to allow the NRC staff adequate time to perform an acceptance review of the application.
- 9. Staff Visits As a part of our review of your license renewal application, members of the NRC licensing staff and its contractor may visit your facility. These visits will be coordinated with you following receipt of your application for renewal.
The NRC staff plans to use the Interim Staff Guidance [ISG] on Streamlined Review Process for License Renewal for Research Reactors (ADAMS Accession No. ML092240244), to complete its review of your license renewal application. As discussed in the ISG, our review of your facility license renewal application will be based on the facilitys power level. Since the MNRC TRIGA nuclear reactors maximum power level is 2.3 megawatt thermal, the NRC staff is planning to use the full review process. Additional details and our planned review schedule are discussed in the enclosure, Reviewing License Renewal Application in Accordance with the Interim Staff Guidance Process and Schedule.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-4103, or by e-mail at Linh.Tran@nrc.gov.
Sincerely,
/RA Alexander Adams Acting for/
Linh N. Tran, Senior Project Manager Research and Test Reactors Licensing Branch Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-607 License No. R-130
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See next page
University of California-Davis/McClellan Docket No. 50-607 cc:
David Reap, Radiation Safety Officer 5335 Price Avenue, Bldg. 258 McClellan, CA 95652-2504 Mr. Walter Steingass, Reactor Supervisor 5335 Price Avenue, Bldg. 258 McClellan, CA 95652-2504 California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS-34 Sacramento, CA 95814 Radiological Health Branch California Department of Public Health P.O. Box 997414, MS 7610 Sacramento, CA 95899-7414 Test, Research and Training Reactor Newsletter P.O. Box 118300 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611 Dr. Wesley D. Frey, Reactor Director McClellan Nuclear Research Center University of California, Davis 5335 Price Avenue, Building 258 McClellan, CA 95652-2504
ML17222A190; *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE NRR/DPR/PM NRR/DPR/LA* NRR/DIRS/BC NRR/DPR/BC NRR/DPR/PM NAME LTran NParker TBowers AAdams (AAdams for)
LTran DATE 8/21/17 8/15/17 9/21/17 9/25/17 9/25/17 Reviewing License Renewal Application in Accordance with the Interim Staff Guidance Process and Schedule Introduction The Interim Staff Guidance [ISG] on the Streamlined Review Process for License Renewal for Research Reactors (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML092240244), was developed to streamline the research and test reactor license renewal review process and to develop guidance for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff for reviewing license renewal applications (LRAs). Figure 1 provides an outline of the streamlined review process. Although the NRCs review process has changed, the licensee/applicant is still required to submit its application in accordance with the applicable regulations contained in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Parts 50, 51, 55, and 73, and the recommendation provided in NUREG-1537, Part 1, Guidelines for Preparing and Reviewing Applications for the Licensing of Non-Power Reactors, Format and Content.
Background
In SECY-08-0161, Review of Research and Test Reactor License Renewal Applications, dated October 24, 2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML082550140), the NRC staff provided the Commission with information about the staffs plans to improve the review of LRAs for research and test reactors. The Commission issued the staff requirements memorandum (SRM) for SECY-08-0161 on March 26, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML090850159). The SRM directed the staff to streamline the renewal process for such reactors, using some combination of the options presented in SECY-08-0161. The SRM also directs the staff to implement a graded approach whose scope is commensurate with the risk posed by each facility. The graded approach incorporates elements of the alternative safety review approach discussed in of SECY-08-0161. In the alternative safety review approach, the staff should consider the results of past NRC staff reviews when determining the scope of the review. A basic requirement, as contained in the SRM, is that licensees must be in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements.
The NRC staff developed the ISG to assist in the review of LRAs. The streamlined review process (Figure 1), is a graded approach based on licensed power level. Under the streamlined review process, the facilities are divided into two tiers. Facilities with licensed power level of 2 megawatts thermal (MW(t)) and greater would undergo a full review using NUREG-1537, Guidance for Preparing and Reviewing Applications for the Licensing of Non-Power Reactors.
Facilities with a licensed power level less than 2 MW(t) would undergo a focused review that centers on the most safety significant aspects of the LRA and will rely on past NRC reviews for certain safety findings. Specifically, for reactors with licensed power levels less than 2 MW(t),
the review will focus on the sections of the safety analysis report (SAR) that are most significant to safety under a focused license renewal approach.
Enclosure
Streamlined Review Facilities with licensed power equal or greater than 2 MW(t) or Facilities requesting a power level increase (FULL review):
The NRC staff will perform the LRA review in accordance with the guidance provided in NUREG-1537, Part 2, Guidelines for Preparing and Reviewing Applications for the Licensing of Non-Power Reactors, Standard Review Plan and Acceptance Criteria.
Facilities with licensed power less than 2 MW(t) (FOCUSED review):
The NRC staff will perform a focused review that centers on the most safety significant aspects of the LRA and will rely on past NRC reviews for certain safety findings. Specifically, for reactors with licensed power levels less than 2 MW(t), the review will center on the sections of the SAR that are most significant to safety. Specifically, the focus will be on reactor design and operation, accident analysis, technical specifications (TSs), radiation protection, waste management programs, financial requirements, environmental assessment, and changes to facility after submitting application.
Streamlined Review Process The review will start with a familiarization site visit to the facility. The NRC team would comprise of, but not limited to, the NRC license renewal project manager, the NRC environmental assessment reviewer, the NRC financial reviewer, and the NRCs contractors. The purpose of this visit is to observe the site configuration and to conduct general discussions regarding LRA with the licensee.
After the first site visit, the NRC staff and its contractors will conduct a comprehensive review of the LRA in accordance with the guidance provided in the ISG. The NRC staff will determine the applications conformance to the regulatory requirements and consistency with NRC guidance and if needed, perform independent confirmatory calculations to verify the applicants statements in the SAR and proposed TSs. The NRC staff will identify the portions of the application needing further clarification to complete its review.
Prior to providing the formal request for additional information (RAI) to the licensee, the NRC staff and its contractor will hold a conference call, or if necessary, a site visit with the licensee to discuss the draft RAIs. This will provide an opportunity for the licensee to provide clarification regarding the draft RAIs. Once the licensee receives the formal RAIs, the NRC staff and its contractor will hold another conference call, if necessary, to clarify any questions that the licensee may have regarding the formal RAIs, and ensure that the RAIs are understood by the licensee.
Prior to submitting its final responses to the RAIs, the NRC staff and its contractor will hold a conference call or if necessary, a site visit, with the licensee to discuss its draft responses to the RAIs to ensure that the responses will enable the completion of the review of the LRA. The NRC staff will also be requesting that the license submit a draft proposed TSs incorporating all the applicable responses to the RAIs.
The NRC staff and its contractors will review and evaluate the licensees responses to the final RAI to determine adequacy and acceptability for the supporting safety conclusions based on the guidance provided in the ISG.
During its final phase of reviewing the LRA, the NRC staff may have further need for additional clarifications. The NRC staff will hold conference calls with the licensee, as necessary, to obtain the additional information necessary to complete its review of the LRA.
The NRC staff will inform the licensee of the projected date for the issuance of the facility renewal license to permit adequate time for the licensee to prepare proper documentation and training once the facility renewal license is issued.
Streamlined Review Schedule Facilities with licensed power equal or greater than 2 MW(t) or Facilities requesting a power level increase (FULL review):
It is estimated that a full review of the LRA will be completed within 24 months, provided that the licensee provides a quality and complete application and adequate and timely responses to the NRC staffs RAI.
Facilities with licensed power less than 2 MW(t) (FOCUSED review):
It is estimated that a focused review of the LRA will be completed within 18 months, provided that the licensee provides a quality and complete application and adequate and timely responses to the NRC staffs RAI.
Figure -1 Research and Test Reactor License Renewal Streamlined Review Process License Renewal Application Received by the NRC All Applicable Issuance of Acceptable Chapters in for Docketing and the SRP-RTR Opportunity for Hearing Federal Register Notice For Test Reactors only, Y Advisory Committee on Facility Reactor Safeguards Licensed FULL Review - Review Power perform in accordance with Level > NUREG-1537, Part 2 2MW(t)? (SRP-RTR)
Draft Safety Issuance:
Evaluation Renewal License N Technical Specifications Report Safety Evaluation Report Y SRP-RTR Sections:
Licensee
- Reactor Design and Operation requested
- Accident Analysis power
- Technical Specifications increase?
- Radiation Protection
- Waste Management Programs
- Financial Requirements N
- Environmental Assessment Changes to facility after submitting Application FOCUSED Review - Review perform primarily on SRP-RTR Sections most significant to safety and on past NRC reviews
- NRC Inspection Reports
- Licensee Annual Reports
- Licensee 10 CFR 50.59 Reviews
- Past NRC Reviews