ML17054B168

Monthly Project Rept for Nine Mile Point Unit 2, May 1984

ML17054B168
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	05/31/1984
From:	STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17054B164	List: ML17054B163 ML17054B165 ML17054B166 ML17054B167 ML17054B168 ML17054B169 ML17054B170 ML18037A064 ML18037A065 ML18037A066 ML18037A067 ML18037A068 ML18037A069
References
NUDOCS 8411150122
Download: ML17054B168 (94)

Text

Project Report l

I Nine Mile Point Unit 2 8411150122 841109 PDR ADGCK 05000410 R

PDR

0 MAY 1984 PROJECT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

1-5 II MILESTONE STATUS 6-7 III CONSTRUCTION 8-28 IV ENGINEERING 29-37 V WORKFORCE LEVELS 38-43 V I QUALITY ASSURANCE 44-56 VI I CONTRACT AOMINISTRATION 57-60 VIII STARTUP & TEST 61-72 IX COST 73-80 X RECOROS MANAGEMENT 81-85 XI LICENSING 86-89

EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

A. Project Director With this issue of the monthly report, we henceforth make the reporting period coincident with our fiscal months. Therefore, the period of this report is from May 1 through May 20, which is essentially a three week period.

For this period, we achieved 1.47 percent progress, which was close to the 1.55 percent planned. The Project is presently on schedule for a February 24, 1986 fuel loading. This is based on the actual progress of work measured from the new milestone schedule program.

We have experienced some problems which caused near tern delays in the milestone schedules, the most serious of which is a three week delay to the service water system. These delays will be discussed later in this report. If these delays are not recovered, then a drawdown from our schedule contingency time will be necessitated.

We do. believe that we will recover these delays in the near term and leave the contingent time intact.

Bul k production 'of coamodi ties continue at a near sati sfactory rate. A major problem area is in that of cable. pulling. We have not been successful in sufficiently opening up a sati sfactory backlog of "clean work available." Corrective steps have been taken but immediate results will not be seen. We have a high confidence level that this area will be brought under control.

Many overall improvements in productivity have been seen in this period, notably in the area of piping and instrumentation.

We experienced in this period an unexpected and unofficial one day strike by the carpenters, due to an incident between our site security and a member of the Carpenter's Union. A one day production loss was experienced. The pro57em was quickly resolved and team building actions were taken to reinforce mutual respect between crafts and security.

Significant actions are underway to streamline and "de-bureaucratize" our work procedures, which will have beneficial effect on our day-to-day work efficiencies.

While our overall cash flow is within plan, we are still concerned about high rates of field purchasing, Project overtime and overall staff levels. Management directed "belt-tightening" actions are unde@say.

EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

(Continued)

A. . Pro ect Director (Continued)

As of this report, the following are the issue which I believe could be critical to the success of the Project:

1. A endfx R (Fire Protection) - The ,Project fs currently assess ng e resu s o e ppendfx R required analysis of a fire fn the control room. Potentially, wiring and hardware change could be required to alleviate concerns relative to remote shutdown capability and ff re-induced spurious operation. The Project will be developing a licensing strategy for this concern fn the very near future.

2. Documentation Mana ement - The Project has indications that e ocumen genera on, review and transmittal'rocess may

'not support timely Construction-to-AOD and AOD-to-NMPC Startup and Test system turnovers. These required record functions will be integrated as detailed activities fn the overall Project Control Plan. As such, they will receive relative to all other supporting activities. equal'mphasis

3. LKC Cable Pullfn - The cumulative LKC cable pulling shortfall or s appt oxfmately 370,000 feet. The followf ng management actions are being taken:

a. Increasing the existing backlog of clean available cable pull fng in advance of the construction effort by df sposf tf onf ng cable pull tickets currently on hol d, dfsposftfon engineering holds restrainfng bulk conduit and releasing yard duct bank which fs restraining 400,000 feet of cable.

b. Established a contractor team to resolve instrument locations restraining conduit runs.

c. Established a management team comprised of Planning and Scheduling, Construction, Engineering, equality Assurance and LKC personnel to identify and resolve restraints fn plant areas to establish clean work available for cable pulling.

4. ITT Grfnnell Meld Reject - Over the last two months, the weld re ect ra e, measure as the number of rejected welds (for radfographed weld), has been fn the range of 35 to 40 percent. NHPC has retained the services of a welding specialist who fs working with the equality Assurance, Construction and Engineering organizations to examine probable cause and enhancements to the existing welding processes.

Results will be provided fn subsequent reports.

EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

(Continued)

A. Pro ect Of rector (Continued)

The majority of 1984 wage negotiations are currently fn progress.

It fs expected that the overall cost oi'ettlements will be wfthfn the estimate allowance.

The tone of this Project seems to be becomfng more positive. The quality perceptions are improving, management of work in accordance with schedules fs also improving and by moving to a new cost center cost control program, sfgnfffcant improvements fn cost control will be seen qufte soon.

B. Pro ect ()ualft Assurance Mana er gualfty activities continue with a high level of comnftment from sf te organf zatfons. In gener al, construction acti vf ties at the sf te are being performed in compl f ance wf th equal f ty Assurance requirements. However, there does appear to be a lack of:

attentiveness for following specific detailed procedural requfrements based on NMPC equality Assurance overview of construction activities. Also, another concern pertains to the ITT Grfnnell weld reject rate which fs too high. Corrective actions are presently underway to resolve these concerns.

The corrective and preventative actions required fn response to the NRC notice of . violation are nearing completion. No major discrepancies have been fdentfffed at this time. The verfffcatfon program to close out all of the NRC CAT ftems fs currently fn progress.

The plan for a review of the CAT inspection findings, recent SALP report and NMPC fdentfffed deffcfencfes, past and current has been developed and implementation by an independent service organization fs underway.

The equality Performance Management Program (gPMP) including the guality Performance Indicators Program (()PIP) required by the NRC enforcement action fs partially developed.

TOTAL PROJECT PERCENT COMPLETE

SUMMARY

TABLE NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION - UNIT 2 PKACKNT ITEM KIOHTKD PKRCKNT MP 1985 1$ 8d F TOTAL PKRCKNT I MILESTONES PROJKCT OMP LET GUM INC S AM S 0 M M NO JSM M ENERGIZATION 1150 V 2.19 95.19 2AO .0127 ~ Ittl00 1.

OIOOIM

2. CONDENSATE DEMINERAUXER 2.$ 8 85.85 2.55 .0171 ~

OIOOIb

3. SERVICE WATER e.oe 85.14 5.18 .0225

4. STANDBY DIESKL .53 59AO 0.31 .0150 OI ~ ~ IOO 5 INTEGRATED FLUSH 13.0Q 7247 9.15 .172$ OI ~ IOO

$ $ .23 0.05 OItt10 ~

e. FLOW INDUCED VIBRATION 0.09 .0017 I

7. TURBINE GENERATOR 2.70 71.05 2.00 .0120 4A5 dsA0 2.91 .0783 /04

8. VENTILATION OI ~

1.14 12.53 0.19 .0327 I

~ 1 OIOO

9. INTKGRATED LEAK RATE ~

10. RAOWASTE SYSTEM 1~ 59ce 0.79 .0211

11. FUEL RECEIPT .75 43AQ 0.33 .0205

12. LOSS OF POWER/ECCS A1 37A1 020 .0208

13. FUEL LOAD A7 52.52 005 .0090 12128IOL I

14. FUEL LOAD TO C O. '1.1 0 0.00 LOO .0000 I I ~ IIIOO SUBTOTAL 3$ .0% 71.13% 27.03% A595%

I ll CONSTRUCTION I I

COMMOOITIES I I

1. PIPING 9.15 $ 5.93 8.12 .1139

2. ELECTRICAL e.e3 58.02 4.38 4528

3. I dt C 0.99 4%51 OA3 .0422

1. HVAC 0.$ 3 75AO 0.83 .0215 S. CIVIL 13.10 100.00 1L10 SUBTOTAL 31.0 OL00$ $ 2L00$ $ .230218 IIISTARTUP 8cTEST COMMOOITIES

1. PRE.OPERATIONAL TESTING 0.80 0.00 .000 .0000 2.HYDROS 0.80 7A7 .050 .0085

3. LOOP CAUBRATIONS OAO 047 .002 .0022

1. CONTROL CIRCUIT VERIFICATION OAO 1.15 .009 .0019

5. INITIALEOUIPMENT OPERATION O.da 3m .025 .0133

5. FLUSHES 0.75 2.83 .021 .014$

7. PENETRATION LEAK RATE TESTS 035 0.00 .000 .OOM SUBTOTAL 5JXI% @38% .11514 .0407%

IV ENGINEERING

1. DESIGN VERIFICATION 842 11.75 0.0$ .0257

2. EOUIPMENT OUAUFICATION 254 85.93 0.17 .ooes

3. LICENSING .550 88,07 0.37 .0157 I. SUPPORT OF STARTUP .310 51.$ 1 0.15 .0317 S. BALANCE OF ENGINEERING 1033$ 0'1,03 10.00 .0850 SUBTOTAL 20.088 01.3011 IIAIOO .125588 V QA 5 RECORDS 1.QUALITY ASSURANCE 5.0 52.09 2.50 .1015

2. RECORDS TURNOVER TO PPF 1.0 19.00 0.19 .0000 SUBTOTAL 8,Cled 4d.50% 2.7$ % .1045%

100.%C 74.07% 1.47%

TOTAL STATUS AS OF 5/20/84 NOTE 1: 'his table is preliminary reflects project data available as of G" NOTE 2: Corrected Total Percent Complete as of 5/1/84 was 72.60%

5/20/84. Group I reflects the most re- addition of pre-operational based on data refinements and t

cent project planning. Groups II,infor- III, IV and V reflect 1984 Work Plan mation. As revised Project Control Program data is finalized it will be included in the table.

TOTAL PROJECT PERCENT COMPLETE PERFORMANCE CURVE NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION - UNIT 2 100 98 asia 96

<rrrr a

94 PLANNED j r Qr INC. 1. 551 l. 471 IV 90 r 74.981 74.071 NT Q 98 49 r

86 0f 84 2 82 or 80 r 78 r'

4 PLANNED 76 ACTUAL 74 r N N

99 72 Jill 99AT JVN JVL AVO Sti OCT NOV OSC JAN 544 IJAN Aill 99AT JVN JVL AVO 55i OCT NOV OCC JAN 554 99AN A54 llAY JVN WL AVO 544 OCT 1984 1985 1986 This curve is preliTalnary a reflects project data available as of 5/20/84 As revised project Control progra54 data is finalized it vill be included NQTE:

in the curve.

II. NILESTONE SCHEDULE STATUS A. Ener fzatfon 4160V During Nay, the 4160V Nflestone slipped to one week behind schedule because of delays fn turning over DC dfstrfbutfon and 4160V turnovers, Plans are underway to regain the lost time during testing without impact to the overall milestone completion.

B. Condensate Demfneralfzer Mork proceeded f n sequence wf th the Nflestone Schedul e. The schedule slipped two weeks due to hydro test failure on the critical condensate storage tanks. A repair method fs fn hand and work will be accelerated to maintain the overall schedule. It fs expected that this time will be regained within the next two months.

C. Service Mater Overall status of thf s work f s three weeks behf nd due to .

dffffcultfes experienced fn the service water pump bays. Electrical and fnstrumentatfon work activities have not proceeded as planned due to congestion. The areas have now been cleared for work to proceed and a detailed recovery plan fs being generated. Upon completion of this analysis, a clear picture of impact and ability to recover wfll be presented.

0. Diesel Generator Mork proceeded fn =support of the Milestone Schedule with no ma)or varfances noted.

E. Int rated Flush Overall status fs one week behind schedule due to a number of moor mechanical activities falling behind. Logic and resources are under evaluation to improve the work sequence in congested areas which are the cause of critical path delays. Positive steps have already been taken to expedite pipe whip restraint work.

For the following, work proceeded in support of the Mflestone dates with no overall impacts noted.

l. Flow induced vibration

2. Turb)ne generator

3. Ventflatfon

4. Integrated leak rate

5. Radwuste system

6. Fuel receipt

7. Loss of power/ECCS

8. Fuel load

MILESTONE SCHEDULE STATUS (Continued)

Detailed reviews of the area system schedule will begin next month to substantiate the Milestone logic. Resource constraints will necessitate acgustments internal to the Milestone Schedules, but it is expected that the Milestone dates will be maintained.

I II. CONSTRUCTION A. General Construction performance is generally proceeding reasonably well as discussed under Contractor Performance. The moor construction comaodities are depicted on the following graphs along. with the year-to-date and current unit rates.

Efforts are essentially complete relative to SWEC and subcontractor organizational rationalization, with a concomitant reconfiguration of NMPC Construction such that appropriate interties exist. This is referenced as a singular example of an overall program to effectively manage the balance of the Project while achieving cost optimization.

Difficulty is being experienced .in the turnover of systems to Advisory Operations for preliminary testing primarily due to the need to finalize the required preplanning and support organizations.

A renewed emphasis placed on improving general site cleanliness has reduced a significant proportion of prior deficiencies. SMEC and subcontractors must 'ontinue to proactively pursue necessary management controls to assure further results in this area.

SPEC S. 8. PIPE w 65,967 COH400ITY - SNECe 5 ~ 8 ~ PIPE I UNIT NN UANTITY HANHOURS RATE I.F

/

7,403 53,302 7,20

/ CUR NT PLAN ACTUAL 5o443 27>066 4 '7 19 YEAR TO PLAN 25,246 181,771 7.20 OA ACTUAL 21,903 109,094 4.98 NOT The PLAN is based on, the I/84 re-estimate plan.

J FMAMJ JASOND J FMAM J JASON D J FMAM J JAS Y984 1985 0986 THI1V 10'01 ~ ~0

SllEC 5.8. HANGER 20 000 18>000 16,000 14 F000 12,000 r IZ,557 COH%0ITY - SUE , S. 8. HANGER 10i000 UNIT ITY NNHOIIRS RATE URRENT PLAN 85 33 i898 39.60 8,000 ~Y ACTUAL 75 32e024 42.19 6,MO 984 YEAR-TO- PLAN 2 o38 94o525 39 '0 P ACTUAL 3 I58 122,370 34.15 4,MO, P OTE: The PLAN Is based on t e 4/I/84 re-est1mate plan.

2,000 r 0.

J F aa A aa J J A 8 0 ll 0 J F al A aa J JASOal0 J FNAaa J J Ad 0 1964 1985 1986 THIIV 10 ~ I ~ aa /

10

ITT PLAN VS ACTUAL 5 8 PIPE 119 086 110000 108000 I

/

106000 t CQ+l00ITY - ITT, S.B. PIPE I gUANTITY I NANHOU S UNIT IIATK (NH/L CURRENT PLAN 2 ~500 8 ~ 725 3 49

~

104000 MONTH-ACTUAL 2,001 9,494 4.74 I

I 102000 1984 Y PLAN 17,600 61~424 3.49 TO-OATE MAY ACTUAL 16s463 65e782 4.01 100000 g

u I

I The PLAN is based on the 4-1 84 re-estimate plan.

I 98000 96000 94000 92000 JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJAio 1984 1986 1986 THnv 10 01' c Monthly quantltles exceeded plan.

Actual

---

Planned 11

ITT PLAN VS ACTUAL 5 8 HANGERS 15,190 15000

+o v P

14500 13500 I CQgiOOITY - ITT, S. 8 ~ HANGER UNIT 13000 /

f gUAHTITY HAHHOURH RATE MH/EA)

CURREN PLAN 585 13R625 23.29 MONTH ACTUAL 480 24H760 51.58 12500 1984 Y PLAN 4,118 95,908 23.29 I TO-OAT ACTUAL 2,805 133,898 47.74 12000 MAY NOTE: Th PLAN is based on the 4-1 84 re-estimate plan.

11500 11000 10500 10000 J FMAM J JA SOHO J FMAMJ JASON 0 J FMAM J J*S O 1084 1985 1086 Twnu 10 01 as Major action item has been identified to improve small bore hanger fabrication and installation. ITT-G, SWEC, NMPC are reviewing processes and developing corrective actions.

Actual Planned 12

ITT Pi.AN VS ACTUAL L 8 PlPE 225,000 COieiOO ITY l L.B. P1PE UNIT 222,500 F OUANT Y HANHOURS RATE I

f CURRENT HONTH - HAY PLAN ACTUAL 3,3 4,6 16.733 21>566

'5.04 4.60 220,000 I I 1984 YEAR- PLAN 20,9 105 780 5.04 TO-BATE 19>2 116 696 6.08 217 >500 I I NOTE: The PLAN is based on 4-1-84 re-estimate I e plan.

215,000 212>500 I I

210 000 I

207,500 205>000 202,500 200,000 JFMAMJJASOHDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASO 1984 1985 1986 Ynnu >d-Ol ~ Oi Honthly quantities exceeded planned installation requirements.

Efforts are in process to expedite remaining spools in the vendor's shop to maintain this positive trend.

Actual Planned

ITT PLAH VS ACTUAL L 8 HANGERS 18,181 18,000 17,500

/

t

/ COISIODITY - ITT, L. B. HANGER 17>000 UNIT

/ ANTITY NMlfOIIRS RATE 16,500 CURREHT PLAN 609 86,630 142.25 NNTH - }IAY 16,000 ACTUAL 595 74,495 125.2 15,500 / 1984 YEAR- PLAN 2,699 383,933 142.2 TO DATE-

/ HAY ACTUAL 2,476 439,025 177.3 15,000 /

HOTE: The PLAN is based on he 4-1-84 re-est1mate plan.

14,500 14,000 13,500

/

13,000 12,500 J FMAM4 JASONDJ FMAMJ JASDND J FMAII 4 JASO 19d4 19d5 19dd THnu 10 01 ~ a Honthly quantlt1eS were slightly below plan.

Action program Is being developed to Improve hanger production and reduce unit rate.

Actual Planned

1TT PLAN YS ACTUAL L 8 WELD 24000 23500 r~ 23,378 23000 ~'

22500 /

COHH001TY - I, L. 8. VELD (IN!ff!TY NAIINURS INST RAT I

22000 I CURRENT PLAN 550 16,038 29.16 NONTH- Y ACTNL 936 13,871 14.82 21500 1984 YEA PLAN 3 e 350 97,686 29.16 TO-DATE ACTNL 3,823 87,373 22.85 NAY 21000 NOTE: The PLAN ls based on the 4-1 84 rc-estimate Plan.

20500 20000 19500 JFMAMJJASOHOJFMAMJJASOHOJfMAMJJASO 1984 1985 1986 THIIV 10 01 ~0 15

ITT PLAN VS ACTUAL L 8 VALVES

~e+

2200 2100 r' 2,194 COHHOOITY - ITT

~AIITITT

.B. VALVES IIARIIOURA UNIT RATE CURREHT PLAN 160 5,238 32.74 2000 HONTH HAYACTUAL 138 2,562 18.56 1900 1984 YEAR PLAN 750 24,555 32.74 TO-OATE-I HAY ACTUAL 531 12,988 24.4 1800 1700 NOTE: The PLAN 1s based on he 4-1-84 re-estimate I plan.

I 1600 1500 I 1400 1300 1200 J FMAM J JANOND J FMAM J JA 0DND J FMAM JAJAS 0 1984 1985 1166 Tnnu 1~ ~0 ~s L B valves and valve packing are being expedited to Improve performance.

Schedule recovery Is achievable.

Actual Planned

LKC PLAN VS ACTUAL CONDUIT 835,673

/p 833000 800000 767000 733000 700000 COMMODITY - L.K. CONSTOCKN CONDUIT 667000 8 g IIANTI TT NANNONNN UHIT RATE (HH/LF) 633000 CURRENT PLAN 27. 000 28,390 1.07 HONTH- ACTUAL 24N722 29,575 1.20 N

600000 1984 YEA PLAH 113,000 120N910 1.07 TO-OATE- Y ACTUAL 111,583 128,713 1.15 J

567000 533000 FMAMJ JA8ONOJ FMAMJ JA8ON0J FMAM J JAt O 1084 1985 1086 TH1V 10 00 ~0 Conduit is currently ahead of plan by about I" (cumlative for the year).

J Actions are underway by SNEC to increase conduits released for installation.

Actual Planned 17

L L

LKC PLAN VS ACTUAL CONOU1T SPTS.

320 31,029 3050 r Currently being analyzed as art 2900 P of the Unit Rate improvemen program.

2750 /

z C08%01TY - L.K. C TOCl4CONDUlT SUPPORTS 26 EUANTITT NANNIURN UNIT RATE (INI/EA) 245 13.53 CURRENT PLAN 1N500 20,295 NONTH- Y ACTUAL 1R689 31,670 18.75 2300 13.53 1984 Y R- PLAN 7,000 94,710

/ TO-OATE NAY ACTUAL 7N742 133,318 17.22 215 f 'OTE The PLAN is based on the 4 -84 re-estimate plan.

2000 1850 J FMAMJ JA8OMOJ FIIAMJ JASOHOJ FIIAM J JACO 1084 1085 '1 086 THnu 10 OE.IS Conduit supports ahead of plan.

Actual Planned 18

LKC PLAN VS ACTUAL CABLE PULLING 8,405.903 775000 725000 675 625000 5750 COWOOITY - L.. CONSTOCK I.C.C.P. CABL 52500 gUAIITITY HANHOIIRS UNIT RATE HH/LF) 475 CURRENT PLAN 450.991 49,589 0.09 HONTN- NAY ACTUAL 310,318 43,229 0.14 425000 1984 Y R- PLAN 1,900,131 171,012 0.09 TO-OATE -NAY ACTUAL 1,528,855 173o041 0 11 37500 NOTE: The PLAN is based on the 4- -84. re-estimate plan.

325000 J FMAMJ JABONDJ FMAMJ JASOND J FMAM J JASO 1984 1985 1986 Yneu sO 01 ~ aa A team has been established as part of the planning effort to schedule raceways in advance of pulling cable to improve production.

Weekly SWEC/LKC production meetings have been re-instituted.

Actions are underway to improve cable pulling efforts by timely release of pull tickets by SWEC Engineering.

Actual Planned 19

LKC PLAN VS ACTUAL CABLE TERM 276.663 2750 P

25000 CONeOITY - L.K. CONST CX, CABLE TERM.

175 gUANTITY NANIUURS UNIT RATE (MH/EA) 15 16',858 0.87 URRENT PUN 19 U377 NTH-MAY ACTUAL 11,259 13,739 1 ~ 22 g 125 1984 YEAR- PLAN 69,668 60,611 0.87 C -OATE-MAY ACTUAL 52U937 56,434 1.07 TE: The PLAN is based on e 4-1-84 re-estimate plan.

75 f JFMAMJJACONOJFMAMJJASONOJFMAMJJABO 1084 1085 1086 Twnu 10'01 ~0 Terminatlons are not lagging seriously at this t$ me an4 have improved over the last two (2) weeks.

Actual Planned 20

JCI PLAN VS ACTUAL SEISNIC SPTS.

5500 w 5,300 5000 A(

AI

/

4500 CONNOOITY JCI SEI IC SUPPORTS UNIT 4000 gU ANT IT T NANNUURN RATE CURRENT PLAN 325 13,650 42.0 NONTH - HAY 3500 ACTUAL 208 12.000 57.69 1984 YEAR- PLAN 1,039 43,638 42.0 3000 TO-OATE-NAY ACTUAL 887 48,012 54.13 2500 NOTE: The PLAN 1s based on he 4 1-84 re-est1mate plan.

2000 1500 1000 500 J FMAMJ JASOKOJ FMAMJ JASOKOJ FMAII J JASO 1084 1985 1086 Ywnu 10'01 ~ I Engineering instrument drawing confirmation. scope def1nition, and quantity take-off effort is scheduled to be complete with1n two (2) weeks. The quantity curve will be ad)usted to reflect new quantity based on the above.

JCI is proceeding >>1th pre-installation layoutt and walkdowns to facilitate production and quality acceptance.

Actual Planned 21

JCI PLAN VS ACTUAL INST. TUBING 250UOOO 225U000 P

r ~ 230,115 200,000 COHNOOITY - JCI T. TUBING UNIT 175 UOOO gURRTITT IWIRUURE RITE CURRENT PLAN )2U469 20,574 1.65 150,000, ~TACTUAL 9,910 16U544 1.67 125UOOO 1984 YEAR- PLAN 39,845 65,744 1.65 ACTUAL 25 ~ 983 47,539 1.83 NA Y 100,000 75,000 NOTE: The PLAN is based on the 4-1-84 re-estimate p'lan.

50UOOO 25,000 J FMAM J JASONOJ FMAM J JA 90140 J FMAM J JAS O 1984 1985 1986 YHIIV IO'01 ~0 A recovery trend has been noted this month.

JCI has established a weekly installation plan <<ith full recovery projected in support of the milestone schedule.

Actual Planned 22

I II. CONSTRUCTION (Continued)

B. Contractor Performance SWEC Force Account In general, SWEC Force Account work scope is proceeding well fn tens of , commodity installation targets and schedule compliance.

Mechanical E ui ment Erection Approximately 80 percent of the equipment scheduled to be installed has been released for external piping connections.

In addition, there is a considerable 'evel of effort which places the balance at various stages of completion. All planned maintenance requirements for installed equipment were satisfactorily met during this period. No significant schedule impacts are anticipated or pro)ected.

Cat II and III Han er Co letion Planned quantities were achieved this month. 'pproximately 1000 Cat II Hangers in the Ox to 4x phase were transferred from the ITT Grinnell to SWEC to permit ITT Grinnell to concentrate efforts on critical Cat. I items. ITT Grinnell was in full agreement with this scope modification.

Small Bore Pi e and Su orts Small bore pipe installations are tracking slightly below the original 1984 Work Plan requirements. Full recovery is anticipated.

With regard to small bore hangers, installation performance exceeded planned quantities.

Condenser Erection The hydrostatic test is complete. Identified leaks have been repaired.

2. ITT Grinnell Overall, ITT Grinnel 1 continues to sustain the improved perfonnance trend and have essentially achieved key commodity installation values above planned requirements. This accomplishment was noteworthy in view of a substantial work force reduction'of approximately 550 pipefitters.

23

I I I. CONSTRUCTION (Conti nued) t B. Contractor Performance (Conti nued)

A ma)or effort f s underway to improve 1 arge bore hangers installation performance fn the Primary Contafnaant from both cost and schedule considerations.

3. L. K. Comstock Cumulatively, L. K. Comstock continues to experience shortfalls with regard to key indicator commodities. The activities required to maintain a substantial backlog and allow satisfactory installation rates are as follows:

Engineering has defined a methodology for expediting hold, improving the disposition of ftems restraining raceway'ickets on bulk raceway and coordinating priority work requirements deffned by L. K. Comstock. L. K; Comstock fs fn the process of establishing additional cable pulling and conduit crews and-fnterfacfng with Johnson Controls and ITT Grfnnell to provide access points for raceway installations. Once these impediments are resolved, the cable pulling backlog of clean work available will increase, thus allowing work pace to accelerate. Cable termfnatfons will follow suit.

Current efforts are'oncentrated fn support of the 4160 milestone, resolving associated material constraints, accomplfshing required Field equality Control fnspectfons and required testing.

GE-PGCC Subsequently identified subdivisional separation problems and the implementation of resolutions to both divisional and subsdfvfsfonal open items have moved the completion date to the end of June 1984. The closure of these separation issues and associated work activity continue to be managed as the leading indicator of overall PGCC schedule performance. Total completion, including NSSS/BIP program requirements, fsscheduled for February 1985.

5. Johnson Controls Johnson Control s improved prevf ous f nstrument tubf ng f nstal 1 atf on requirements, but remain bel ow the cumul atf ve plan. Seismic tube supports continue to exhibit shortfall. A quantity development effort, due June 15, 1984, may reduce the number of requf red supports by about 2400. Addi t f onal SMEC 24

CONSTRUCTION (Continued)

B. Contractor Performance (Continued)

Field Engineers have been assigned to assist Johnson Controls in preinstallation walk-downs in an effort to significantly reduce required rework and strengthen Johnson Controls coverage in other areas. Restraints relative to interfacing piping, design, procurements and contractor interferencces have been identified for Management response. 'erformance projections are favorable. However, continued proactive efforts are required to accomplish schedular requirements.

6. Schneider Power Co oration The HVAC effort is proceeding with same commodity shortfall.

Schnei der i s managing their work ef fort and comunicating problems to SWEC as they arise. ACtions are in process to strengthen the schedule coordination and engineering support.

7. GE (Turbine/Generator)

On schedule - no serious impacts projected.

8. Reactor Controls, Inc.

On schedule - no serious impacts projected.

9. ~Viki n (Fire Protection - Radnaate)

On schedule - no serious impacts projected.

10. Grinnell Fire Protection Generally on schedule. Preparations are ceaaencing for testing activity.

Metal Claddin Industries Minor problems encountered with regard to hydro test activity.

Resol tuions pending and some rework may be required. No serious schedule threat.

12. Insulation Contracts (Various)

This effort will begin to receive increasing visibility consistent with schedule requirements. Limited progress reported.

25

I I I. CONSTRUCTION (Continued)

B. Contractor Performance (Continued)

13. Randall Electric Overall progress has been limited due to the late release of cooling tower electrical design information. SWEC Engineering and expediting are working to improve turnaround.'o serious schedule exposure.

14. S nder Mackin and Shaffer No problems reported - efforts continue.

15. NMPC Line De artment Work activity is proceeding on schedule.

16. Zurn Industries (Cooling Tower)

On schedule - punch list items.

17. Gives Steel Co an (Miscellaneous Steel Erection)

On schedule - punch list items.

18. Tuscarora Construction (Revetment Ditch)

Work activity. is proceeding on schedule.

19. H. H. Robertson (Siding and Roof Decks)

Work activity is proceeding on schedule.

20. Central Cit Roofin (Built-up Roofs)

Work activity is proceeding on schedule.

21. Plimouth Mana ement Inc. (Fireproof - Protective Coatings)

Work activity is proceeding on schedule.

22. Walsh Construction Work activity is proceeding on schedule (i.e. site backfill, security duct banks, masonry walls, grouting (equipment), storm drain structures, etc.

26

III. CONSTRUCTION (Continued)

B. Contractor Performance (Continued)

23. Pullman (Main Gaa Stack)

Work activity proceeding on schedule.

24. Northern Read Nix Minor problems noted with regard to cement supplies. Overall, no serious impacts pro)ected. Coverage is being maintained through alternative suppliers.

C. Construction Co letion The turnovers of BIPs from Construction to SWEC Advisory Operations Division is currently 24 turnovers behind schedule as indicated in the following table.

27

CONSTRUCTION (Contf nued)

BIP CONSTRUCTION T/Os to AOD s 0 Schedule Cum. Actual Cum.

4160 26 19 Condensate Demfn. 8 3 Service Mater 6 1 Radwaste 1 0 Integrated 1 0 Integrated Leak Rate Test 0 0 Ventilation Test 3 0 Diesel Generator ,2. 0 Turbfne/Generator 0 0 Loss of Power/ECCS 1 1 Fuel Receipt 0 0 Fuel Load 0 0 48 24 Prior turnovers +13 37 Efforts to strengthen the turnover rate center around appropr f ate work planning and completion of bulk comnodfty installations and the fonnatfon of f ntegrated systems compl etfon groups wf thf n each organf zatfon to properly manage BIP priority work. The new Prospect Control Plan scheduling array will provide visibility of critical items.

28

IY. ENGINEERING A. General Overall Engineering and design efforts continue on schedule for cable routing, cable ticketing, set point development, responses to fSAR questions, Appendix R efforts, Cat. II and III stress data packages, ALARA shielding and the main plant process computer. The Bar Chart sutteary of the 1984 Engineering Work Plan as amended is provided on the following two pages.

29

ISNLCTC WWOCtlroLIO SN I UCWTCCT TTLTTIC Os NCO TACIKTIINC <<CCC PCLIT (TTITITUCLC TTLN OLOOTSOCL LOOIIC ION oweS)

't IIUM oloee osos w ~ IANU wvet owse soootowL voce o<<ow OONN ow W rot w ote seso s0 ~

AO OO OO OO Oo eo I NT OaO Sto ISIS W~ 0 SN IVS 4 ~ OO Otl Oe Oil O IO ISN OIO ool OV te 4 (Ulo 1 ottks

~ oe ill~ w Iws tew to wo eo, a reel oo T

~ tl

~ tssv Wl 00 so

) ~0 owo

~

f -.p 0 0

~ V Wtw

~ roooo 4 t

~ Ieo oos ooN 4lws OWN SSIN oM shaw 4wtl Iesoo ww oor ooo ow ssso '

oslto

~ 0 OS SW 0000~0 WO ISOW ~. Nwos sess UA sooIU04 oeoooloso swtet oe Ks IONWV OW 'sro

'VWNA Olio Ite SJ v I vo osvsol WW\I tlo oe Ssrt I VW Eosst ses so%) 0 ~ Oooo tt oreoow U4oooo ~

twr Ito soot llllllloo swotossw toe lee

~ ltll NtO

~

~w ~OAUO 0 O~ '

As ~O OO os sor OIN oso Oooj

~

)

irto OO Iso teo see seo INN tev CLC SUS

~ ~

Ior tN ~

IS lv Ue

~ teol lsl IO ~

~ r OO w OOOO ION SN rt ~ ~ ee All OO ~ OA OO OV sew AO ON ISO Ss rw se OW Sl ~,W I

~)

ss Nose OCW 0

0< ~ sto te 00

)Ct rs ~ ot ~

Ose ossl, illo,sW wN Iso nsol NN too

~

f Iso oot ~ SONO osess

~ Ies AAVsvr 1 w wtNN sswwow

<<to 0 to I 4 I I

estoI /

s 1 lOCk IOITOCl NS i ltti N ov os sr Now I

OOW 0 OAW ASIA I

0 OW ~ eel NOSO UOOI OSSW SOW I $ A~~CKp I rircr l. ASSO 0 ~ Ot ~

lloI tst )

,'OIS ~ ts osl O O Oso IstW leer OM too SI CCNtttt J sot <<II ow o saws sooo OOW 0 100TTI t CLT '

I Oi

$ otLT IIOCIUL

~CCCsCV ~

m~so 00 so ttss

-'O

~

)

CWTN. I I0041 IOC 1 ~

A O teee TJ

'jg IOCCT%5 TWI CTOSIIITTCT 0 0 I S Ot I'se I CCNTtOI ~ Is e ss ~ "Ile oss I Us tel ILUCI ~ 1 QO osl UO LIITV I Io ~ ,I ~ 00

~ ~

( ~ 0 ~ '0 I Asti

'TWAICLTTTNI ttrt I ol 0~ 'ss ss oe tss 1ev 04 tso oo 4 eos I ~I 0~ ~ 'I

~ sso ~ AO tow ~ AO Isles SSSA 0 li~ NIIO setl'I

'I- -t

~ oeswt IOL Uwsos oovU

~ flees otce I 0 el 1 UN ~

~ IW 'tUlsN Nl Ulvl SUNI tlsNI UNI tele I It le WW W I IAW IP I tts I0 II~ IV tsllt .Ols ONI 0 lo .SW SW ~ ' 0 ~ CNCISCCLN0 SS044

~ I OAOI ~

I CO Iso I tt) sf s ~

t '. 0OCISSOL Otoes 000S Nw

~ OII ss A sW IIN Q~ 404r ~ OW OWNS 30 s

ITS QC )V4, 'W,M gya40IIT cUAIFIclooN aaoocaaa I 404oILO Oflfco <<[144 aco$ aspe aoolf104$

a<<>>l vaaa aaa aw AA <<<<aa ~ Ilr ~a aaa I'4 <<41 I1 1 va ahr 14<<I I<<ra I a<<4 ~ <<aa aalf valll v Iia ~ 114

<<4 aaf II a<<1

<<I aaa )a4 v Jgg

~I Aa oa I<<a <<a>>a )41 wal llaa, <<<<a <<II <<0 <<all NCVICW

)4IO4TS <<I <<I I II OCV)I$ $

<<I <<) ~ ai I aa4 laal <<4 <<<<I I<<IN I was a<<ala aaah 1<<aa alai Aa<<a <<1<<<<ha CIJKit )CO C C TI ICIOOS ~ aa ~

I PIC

.I<<aaa '1<<<<II I

e<<

ICWIIC Ifoo aa llaf 4

~

Oaekht

)Oloas a<<I a<<a>> raw a a<>

~

hal4 h III<<<< III4a LICAO 0 Ha <> 44<<<<<<O>>>> Ial<<04 <<ala

~ fa

'I AC%\ 0(

4 1 saof I afflvffl 'LIAOIOI

,IOIIOICAIS) Ol 0 vaa wea<<aa p ia<<CSS ~ 0 Oi I aah Iaao 4<<o lg

'COIAI<<C<<C ~ aor aaaaaaaa I

I IOV<<IS$ 0( 01

'IIOAIIIC<<T ~ I

)IM,O>>

)

j laraaaaa I

I NI)l <<aa <<ao I

, 1$$ 4avcs( 4I 4 l I ~ I IVI )I il 4%I ~ Waa Oal

~

~

I I

IOIII44<<tf  !

l Ivt~ 7)f SCL

~ CTIS OC Xfoatsou)

<< I<<

I J

IOO C( C I

<<<<<<a>>>> I>>>>>> <<<<>>a<< ~11>>1 ara I

JI a VI 414>>va I wpa

~~

1 II

~

v aaa I>>a ' e>>aai

~

'I 111 I SI Coo ffff Cl "oaf f aa Sall OOSI I OI

>>>>aa a ~ Wa ~

I4sallacca<<s 4$ 04 HJLN Aooltlo<<sf, I i<<sea<<ma)41'>><<>>>>1>>i<<eaaa <<4<<a.

aa I<<

. i If aa,a)AAI I ii$)<<fl laalal I I II)a I<<rat<<I

'~A IEIIOIII I 'I aa

'llvCC <<ATCC >>>> <<<<>>I Oaa>><<aa a<<>>la>>a)aa<<<< l ~ 1<<l

~ >> IAR>> a<<1 vl~ ~

~

4l c<<>>a

~~a<<a

~ I.O na. f<<VII ~

I

<<Al<< ~ al, ll<<aaalI ~ ~ <<11 11 ~ '

~

I@II Ill :Illa

~ I<<

ovcs l <<a>> aa<<<<>> ~ ~ V ASCC <<Oo)f v ll ~ <<I IIC IAOCS TO <<I <><<I<< la<< Sv I hlCTNKJI,

'I I >>>><<a<<a <<<<I

'IOITOILS Oj 1

<<vl Mpa a<<v >>ha

>><<<<<<I <<aa I

f wl

~

I OOII00 0l Ia foa I owoAMs~iw I I";i ,aa I I

>> alai

~ ~

Iy. ENGINEERING (Continued)

B. Problem Areas

~EP The spare parts effort has been totally reevaluated. A new schedule has been developed which is based on procuring spare parts two months before BIP turnover. The total procurement effort is scheduled to be completed by October 1984. The effort is currently 50% complete.

2. As-Builts The as-built stress reconciliation program for the large-bore pipe and hanger effort remains behind schedule due to lack of ITT-Grinnell as-built drawing input. Efforts are continuing on the as-built stress scheduling effort. Project Planning has ceaaitted to provide this schedule by June 1, 1984.

3. ~Aendfx R Methods for compliance with Appendix R considering a fire in the Control Room is currently being evaluated for remote shutdown capability and fire induced spurious operation.

Engineering is currently developing a licensing position and action plan to address this problem. This plan will be available by mid-June.

4~ E i ment qualification Responsiveness of certain vendors has been a problem. A list of these vendors has been developed and actions are being taken to expedite vendor actions to meet the schedule and technical requirements of equipment qualification.

C. ~DH I d1 Of the 110 drawings remaining to be issued as of last month, 110 still remain to be issued. Of the 110, only 69 are required for construction and will be issued as follows:

Electrical - 32 - June h

Structural - 4 - May 32

Iy. ENGINEERING (Continued)

(. ~DH ( I d ( (( (( ((

Neutron monftorfng support - 4 - May Instrumentatfon - 4 - June Power Engineering- 12 on hold - July Berm Drawings - 13 - September Note: There has been no change in these drawing counts since the April report because the status date of thfs report is through the 20th of May. Me anticipate that approximately 20 of these drawings will be issued by May 30.

D. ~Stafftn The results of Headquarters Engineering and Design de-staffing and overtime reductions are evident thf s month. The current Engineering and Design staffing level fn May is pro)ected to be 697*, down from 984" fn February 1984. Refer to the following two graphs for the Headquarters Engf neerf ng and Desi gn cumul atf ve manhours and the Headquarters de-staffing plan.

SEG has increased due to new scope acti vf ties such as more assistance to Johnson Controls Engineering and assignment of addftfonal field engineers to assist contractors. An evaluation of additional manpower requirements will be provided next month.

• equivalent men 33

SHEC ENGINEERING AHO OESIGN PERSOHNEL (Cherry Nf'll)

)00 Planned Actual~ Vaaaaaaa 721 697 (24)

\

8 \

a a

4k 70 IJ 60

'L

~50 o \

C! \

40 30 L 20

)00 J FMAMJ JA8ONDJ FMAMJ JASONDJ FMAM J JA8O 1984 1985 1986 THnv Ie.o ~ ~

~e

'stimate Aaauaa Planned 34

SPEC ENGINEERING AHO OESIGN HAHHOURS

{Cherry Hill)

Planned Actual aaclacca Hay Increnent 115,145 127AOOO 12A145 Cumulative 11,097,509 11,120,060 22,551 J FMAMJ JASOMDJ PMAMJ JASO04DJ F M AM J JAS 0 1984 1985 1986 vllnlJ 10 01 00 Actual Planned 35

IV. ENGINEERING (Continued)

E. Other Activities Engineering has developed a change control procedure that will be used on the prospect to package all future changes to allow proper management to minimize schedule impact.

Status of EEDCRs dispositioned by Engineering is illustrated on the following graph. This area will be monitored closely and emphasis will be placed on reducing the number of EBDCRs open for over 60 days with Engineering.

36

EKOCR STATUS 1000 900 800 700 I tt 600 I I

I 500 I CI 400 ZAV 6 OPCH 0-30 30-60 Qvea 60 300 63 132 125 200 100 J FMAM J JA8OND J FMAM J JASOND J FMAM J JAf O 1984 1985 1986 Twnu 10 ~

01 ~ ec Open eath gnglneeelng at llonth Ene

---

Answered by Engineering during month 37

MORKFORCE LEVELS The s$ te staffing for, all contractors is displayed on the following table. The planned number corresponds to the approved $ 630 m$ 11$ on cash flow (See Cost Section for explanation). Also attached 3s a graph depfctkng the s$ te headcount. The graph Indicates that approximately 700 people have been removed from the site over the last two months and is approaching the 630 million dollar plan.

The CHOC staffing $ s displayed on the Headquarters Services Manpower Graph. It 3 s anticipated that the actual level s w$ 11 approach the Group workforce planned levels. Also attached $ s the Site Engkneerkng 1 evel s.

5/19/84 SITE STAFFING (PAYROLLS)

IIANUAL NON-MANUAL TOTAL COST REIMBURSABLE n a P A P A SWEC 1219 1309 1072 1092 2291 2401 Wal sh 776 760 38 40 814 800 LKComstock 734 859 100 102 834 961 ITT Gr1nnell 1055 1024 350 434 1405 1458 SMS 129 100 4 5 133 105 JCI 168 206 80 85 248 291 Schne1der 141 160 16 16 157 176 Wl1 ts1e 161 0 10 0 171 0 Subtotal 4383 4418 1670 1774 6053 6192

~Hard Mane RAKeasbey 5 5 Central C1ty 4 4 C1ves 13 16 ITT FPS 12 14 RCI 69 12 81 Castaldo 16 1 17 59 10 69 PMI 12 13 HHRobertson 5 Zurn 18 20 Pullman 14 17 V1k1ng 3 4 Rand all 4 Metal Cladd1ng Tuscarora 22 5 27 Subtotal Hard Money '59 41 300 GE/NSSS 75 75 NMPC 394 394 TOTAL 4677 2182 6961 Notes: A. SEG CHOC pa1d are not 1ncluded on th1s report, see the follov1ng three curves.

B. NMPC 1ncludes MAC, NYSKG, RGSE and Central Hudson.

39

1g84 TOTAL PAYROLL MANUAL & NONMANUAL 7.5

,7 6.5 6

Z Lal g

>o~ei

~ 5.5 Oo -630 PLAN 3.5 4l C

40

SHEC ENGlNEERING ANO OESlGN (CHOC, and Site including Advisory Operations, SEG, QA/QC and Progect Services) 17

~ V v 16

~

rr r APR1L RES TS, CI aaa r

aaaaaaa aaaaaa Yaaaaaaa a 15

//

/ CHOC 168,282 201,601 33,319

// SEG 36 500 - 37,364 864 14 13 J F MAM J JASONOJ FMAM J JASOIS0 J FMAM J JAS 0 1964 iSBS TQBB Tnnu 10'01'Is Actual Planned 41

SWEC HEADQUARTER SERVICES EQUIVALEMT HAMPOWER (CHOC E60 and Pro)act Services, Advisory Operations and QA/QC)

Planned Actual Varaaaaa 1500 April 1059 1269 210 1350 1200 1050 900 750 600 450 s,~ Represents the Ap il revised estimate.

300 '

a

\

150 JFMAMJ JASON'FMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJAS0 1984 1985 1986 vHnu 10 01' 0 Actual Planned 42

SEG EQUIVALENT SLNPOMER 250 Planned Actual Variance Apr) l 230 235

~ ~

I \

I I

200 I I

I I

4

\

\

I 150 I'I

//% 1

'i,~ Represents the Aprk revised estimate.

100 g,r

\

\

'a 50 aa n

~ ~ ~ ~

J FMAMJ JASOICOJ FMAMJ JASON 0J FMAM J JAS 1984 l985 1988 VIIIIU IO OI ~C Actual Planned 43

V I. QUALITY ASSURANCE A. ualit Performance Mana ement Pro ram The Quality Per formance Mana'gement Program (QPMP), including the Quality Performance Indicator Program (QPIP) required by the NRC enforcement action, is almosts fully developed. Implementation on site will coaeence June 7. Attached are graphs of installation for certain Category I coamodities; additional curves will be provided in future reports. Also attached are plots of NMPC corrective action requests and surveillance reports. The attached table provides the initial data for the deficiency documents which will be analyzed under the QPIP for trends. Several of these will be depicted on graphs in future reports.

B. NRC Construction Assessment Team (CAT) and Enforcement Letter On May 4, 1984, NMPC responded to the Notice of Violation, Enclosure 2, of NRC letter dated March 20, 1984. Enclosure 2 cited NMPC for eight (8) alleged violations of 10CFR50, Appendix B. NMPC Quality Assurance has completed the verification of the corrective'nd preventive actions addressed in the response. At present there are 19 items that require resolution prior to closure of the verification process.

NMPC has also responded to Enclosure 4 of the Notice of Violation of the NRC letter dated March 20, 1984. Enclosure 4 required three (3) additional actions by NMPC as follows:

1. Submittal of* a plan to the NRC for a review. of the CAT inspection finding, the most recent SALP Report and NMPC identified deficiencies (both past and current). This plan was submitted to the NRC on May 14, 1984 for review and approval. The review is to be conducted by an independent group that has not been involved in performing any work on the project. This review is scheduled to conmence June 4, 1984.

2. Establish, define and submit a listing of, performance indicators to be used to measure and monitor future quality construction on the project. This listing was submitted to the NRC on May 14, 1984 and the implementation plan is currently being finalized.

3. Initiate a plan for an independent third party to conduct an appraisal of organizational responsibilities, management controls, staffing levels, coomunications, and operating practices both at the site and the corporate office. This appraisal fs 'to be initiated no later than one year from the effective date of the Notice of Violation.

44

EQUALITY VI, ASSURANCE (Conti nued)

The CAT Action Plans have been updated to reflect the addftfonal/revfsed comaftments fncluded fn the response to the NRC Enforcement Letter. Formal issuance of these CAT Action Plans is complete. Also, formal written direction has been separately provfdect by NMPC Project and gA Management to implement the majority of the new actions required.

Verfffcatfon efforts associated with completed CAT Action Items begin May 7, Initial efforts were concentrated on items included fn the response to the NRC Notice of Violation as noted above.

Checklists are being prepared by NMPC gualfty Assurance Engineering for verifying the .implementation of specific action plans developed to correct the deffcfencfes fdentfffed by the CAT fnspectfon. As of May 29, 41 checklists were complete. It fs expected that verification o7 the generic and specific action plans will be completed by June 15, 1984.

C. Other NRC Activities The NRC Non-Destructf ve Examf natf on (NDE) Team compl eted i ts fnspectfons at the site with an Exit Meetfng on May 25, 1984. As a resul t of the f nspectf on, two (2) vf ol atf ons and five (5) unresolved items were identified. The NRC concluded that the NDE Actfvftfes at NMP2 are average and that the welding being performed fs very good.

The NRC Hanger Inspection Team completed fts inspections at the site with an Exit Meetf ng on May 18, 1984. There were no violations, unresolved items or open items fdentfffed during thfs inspection.

NRC open items, unresolved ftems and Notfces of Vfolatfons, that remained open as of May 22, 1984, are statused below. It should be noted that the 10 Notices of Violations requiring additional actions includes ffve (5) violations recently issued to NMPC as a result of Inspection Report 884-06.

45

VI, QUALITY ASSURANCE (Continued) 3 Additional Action Final On NRC Item ~Re dived Review Hol d ~Reviews n Total Open: 2 0 22 Unresolved: 26 23 4, 3 56 Violations: 10 2 21 TOTAL 100 1- NRC Open Item, Unresolved Item, or Notice of Violation 2- Additional action required within NMPC or contractor prior to final review and verification by QA (i.e. more documentation required, additional calculations to be performed, etc.)

3- The package for the item is completed and is being reviewed for adequacy 'and completeness prior to submittal to the NRC.

4- Items which parallel or are i dentical to items presently identified in the ,CAT inspection and require further resolution prior to submittal.

5- Items which have been completed and have been forwarded to the NRC for review and approval for closure of the item.

To expedite closure of these items, a weekly meeting has been

. established between NNPC and the resident NRC inspector. The meetings began on M@r 16, 1984.

0. ~St af f$ n The present Quality Assur ance/Qual i ty Control Staff (including contractors) at the Project site is 516. This is an acceptable staffing level to support the construction activities that are presently being conducted.

46

VI. QUALITY ASSURANCE (Continued)

It has been reemphasized to all site organization, that the NMPC

, Quality Assurance Department has overall responsibility for Quality Assurance on the NMP2 Project. The site organizations recognize NMPC's responsibility, and are cooperating to assure that NMPC Quality commitments are maintained, and that any concerns addressed by NMPC Quality Assurance Department are resolved. Recent contractor management changes on the project has helped to enhance these activities.

Plans will be initiated by June 6, 1984 to develop a Team Building Program. The purpose of the Team Building Program is to further enhance the cooperation of the various site organization, to develop a sense of team work and to improve the efficiency of each of the organizations. The program is also intended to integrate and align the site organizations to further ensure that Niagara Mohawk commitments are achieved.

E. Inde endent Review The Independent Review which was directed by the NRC in the CAT Enforcement Action will coamence on June 4, 1984. The review will be performed by an independent service organization utilizing personnel that have not been involved in performing any work on the project. This review is scheduled to be completed in approximately six months.

~

a

~

~ ~

~ I 8I l ~ ~

LKC CAT 1 ACT VS QC ACC CONDUlT 4.5 3.5 n

+c 25 1,5 ACT

-REL TO QC

-QC ACC 0,5 26 52 26 1984 1985 WEEK ACTION CUHH PARTY ACTION ACTUAL INST. -/

RELEASED TO QC /370 QC ACCEPTED IZV X ACCEPTED 49

LKC CAT 1 ACT VS QC ACC CABLE gC Og

$5 PlAN-gC accept is final documen-tation review and will catch-up with the released to gC line.

REL TO QC

-QC ACC 13 26 39 52 13 1984 1985 WEEK ACTION PARTY ACTION ACTUAL INST. -/ /07 PJS n RELEASED TO QC C ACCEPTED 547 2 ACCEPTED

LKC SEtSMIC ACT VS QC ACC CAT 1 CONDUfT SPTS 32 ACT- The p1an includes seismic CAT I. The pIan wi11 be 22 revised to show gA CAT I.

20 gC oe f8 REL TO QC-

-QC ACC t0

.0 39 52 26 1984 )985 WEEK ACTION ITEt< COACH PARTY ACTION ACTVAL INST ~ /S 7P REl EASED TO QC /36/8 QC ACCEPTED X hCCEPTED juo 51

SWEC CAT 1 ACT VS QC ACCEPT S 8 WELDS 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 gI C 10

>n 9 8

nl-6 5 -ACThQC ACC 3

2 '9 0

26 1984 1985 WEEK ACTION ITEN CUl&1 PARTY ACTION ACTUAL INST. 3og REL'EASED TO QC QC ACCEPTED 308 2 ACCEPTED

/00 52

CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTS ( CAR'5) - ALL CONTRACTORS 90 KEY 80 fof Cars Issued fof Cars N th Approve Responses 70 ..... fof Cars Closed 60 SPEC ITT JCI RCI 50 Issued 27 4 3 Approved 15 3 3 40 Closed 5 0 2 30 20 10 JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOMDJFMAMJJASO 1984 1985 1986 YHIIu 10 ~ I' 0

SUMMARY

The increase in issuance of CAR's from February to March was due to the increase in surveillance activities and the use of the new program to identify deficiencies/

deviations. The rate of CAR issuance is decreasing due to implementation of new program. controls and direct management involvement. The substantial increase in approval of CAR responses from April to Nay was a result of direct management involvement, culminating in two full-day sessions, in which resolution of the CAR's was obtained. The remaining CAR's are presently being processed in the same manner.

53

CAR's FREovENcv of DEFICIEHcics / DEYIATI0Ns QtQQkKY EhtEEtm Z. ORGANIZATION 0 0.0 II. QA Itaoam

'.0 ZD. DESIGN CONTRoL IY. RtocuREMEN T 0 CONTROL V. INSTaucTIONS, Pao. 3I.0 eaouaES ) Dwa,S.

VZ. QacumNT CoNTaoL VZZ. CONTaoL aF PURCIIASEb ITEHS VZK. XcaNTiticAT>oN CoNTRoL aF ITENs ZX SI>EC ILL RI0CEsscs Z.5 X. LvsaECTiou I3.0 Xr. TEST CONTaOL 0 CEO XZZ. CONTaoL ot HtTE 0 0.0 XZZZ. IINIoUNO, STORAOE t 5wii'I>>>46 XZV. I>>sPICTioN> TlTT Ot>ERI>TIw 5TATIIS XV. 'o>icoNtomINS 5.0 ITEMS XVZ. CaalKCTNE ACTION 0 0.0

. xvrz. ah Pacoabs xvzzz. AudiTS 0.0 t 3 C 5 I> l S 9 lOii It i3 h4MSER oF bEFiciENciEs/QEv>AtioNS

SURVEILLANCE REPORTS (SR) - ALL CONTRACTORS 200 180 160 XKY 140 l of SR's Issued.

P of SR's Issued N t Unsatisfactory Conditions Noted.

120 100 SPEC ITT JCI RCI 80 'L P of SR's gs Issuel 16 I I 60 P of SR's I Issued w/

I Unsats. 1 0 40 I 1 I I I

20 I l I

I J fMAMJJASONOJ fMAMJJASONO J f MAM J JA8 0 1984 1985 1988 Twnu sO al aa SUGARY The increase fn Surveillance Reports from February to March occurred because Implementation of a revised NMPC Surveillance Program that begun on February 16.

The decrease from March to April was a result of expanding the scopes of the Surveillance Activities to combine more of the Surveillance activities; therefore, reducing the actual number of reports while maintaining the same coverage.

The "apparent" reduction of reports from April to May is because many of the Surveillances for the month of May were still in process at the time of this status {May 18. 1984).

55

SR's FR'EoUKNcY oF DfslcIEHcIEs / DEvlATIONs EauuuM Z. OROAP4IEATIou 0 OO IZ. GA, PROD~ I.O III. DcsloPI Cow TRol. I,O IV. RIOCUREHEHT Cow TROI.

IHSTRUCTIOIVS, 'I.O csouacs $ Dwss.

vI. DocuMEIIT CcwTRol.

VII. COHTRol. oF Z.O RlaoIABED DEHs CK. TncuTIFIcATiou Aul3 8.O Covc AcTnw O.O XVII. Qh QCcoROS 23. O XVgI. AUOITs 0 O.O IO 20 3) VO SO 40 NUMBER of QEFICIEHcIKSIDcvIATloks 56

V I I. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION A. Mador Contracts/Purchase Orders to Go Four. CHOC originated purchase orders remain to be awarded. The attached table lists the purchase orders and their estimated value. Eighteen site originated contracts remain to be awarded.

Most are miscellaneous contracts such as doors, floor, tile and fencing.

57

CHOC ORIGINATED PURCHASE ORDERS OUT TO BID DATE OF AWARD FRD PRESENT PRESENT DATE ANTICIPATED ANTICIPATED EST. VALUE

1. &ripproofing Mod. HPCS 9/14/84 (A) 6/11/84 (A) 7/20/84 $ 50,000 Diesel Generator (Engr.

and Design)

2. P414B Turbine Bldg. Yentil. 9/24/84 2/1 0/84 6/1 5/84 25,532

3. P233N Alar a Shielding Steel 2/25/85 4/02/84 (A) 6/23/84 324,850

4. W014B Resin Sampling Sys. 8/1 7/84 3/23/84 (A) 6/22/84 35,000 A Anticipated Date, otheMse all dates are to be considered actual.

• P.O. Number not assigned.

58

VII. CONTRACT AOMINISTRATION (Continued)

B. Major Contract Issues

1. P301C - ITT Grinnell A program is being developed to provide revised incentive for the remaining work to be accomplished by ITT Grinnell under Contract P301C. Existing contract funds are being used. The progiam is targeted for completion by mid-June.

2. Penetration Insulation (Sealin )

A delay in completion of the penetration insulation (sealing) specification has delayed release of the respective inquiry for bids. Release of the specification is targeted for July 23. The project is currently reviewing the impact of this delay.

3. E061A - L. K. Comstock LKC maintains that they are not in agreement with the tentative agreement reached by SWEC on fee adjustment for contract growth. LKC has been asked to submit their position to settle this issue.

4. P111P - Anaconda American Brass Co a - Condenser Tubes Anaconda's parent company, ARGO Metals Co., proposed a lump sum settlement of $ 10,000 to closeout the alleged defective tube claim; This settlement is predicated upon unqualified acceptance of a disclaimer. NMPC agreed with SWEC's recommendation to accept the cash sum and reject any disclaimer.

5. P301B - ITT Grinnell Fabricated Pi e

a. Backcharges ($ 500,000) - ITTG must respond to backcharges dating back three years. ITTG has committed to meet with SWEC and NMPC before the end of May and attempt to resolve the backcharges. NMPC has deducted the $ 500,000 from ITTG invoices.

b. Material Inventory ($ 300,000 to date) - ITTG must respond to audit findings identified to ITTG on April 26. ITTG

~

has comnitted to meet with SWEC/NMPC before the end of

'ay to resolve the issue.

yI I. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION (Continued)

6. P301N - ITT Grinnell Pi e Su orts Engineering Billing Issue ($ 880,000) - ITTG had the action to provide,Justification for engineering rates and hanger design charges. SPEC was advised on May 10th that ITTG would not be providing actual costs as )ustification. Instead, a comparison with other vendor price books would be furnished..'his response is expected from ITTG by May 18. NMPC has deducted the $ 880,000 from ITTG invoices.

P282 - Rockwell International dro en Recombiners A qualification program was procure'd for $ 37,000. Rockwell International contends that their contractural obligations have been met even though the original program has been completed without attaining the desired goal. In order to supply a program that conforms to IEEE-323-1974, Rockwell International solicited NMPC to goin a second qualification .

program for $ 250,000. SMEC maintains that this is a of the specification and no additional 'equirement compensation is required. SPEC has requested Rockwell to reevaluate their position and submit a response no later than the week of May 21, 1984.

7. MAC Contract The contract between NMPC and MAC was executed the week of May 14, 1984.

C. Materials Mana ement Site Stora e Activities at the offsite warehouse have increased with the addition of 15,000 sq. feet of Level C storage. This additional space was necessitated due to aisle congestion in the main warehouse and the loss of two Level C storage facilities at the site.

2. Inventor Control In late April, the Materials Group conducted a full inventory of the warehouse. The inventory was limited to material and equipment by purchase order, material receiving report number, and storage location.

60

YIII. STARTUP AND TEST A. General Preliminary testing continues at an acceptable rate to adhere to the project schedule. Preoperatfonal test procedures are fn the final review and approval stage in prepar ation for preop test coaeencement following jur f sdf ctf onal transfer to NMPC. NMPC Records Management has been advf sed of the fol 1 owf ng impendf ng system turnovers.

115KY yard drains (BIP 66.004) 5/30 115KV swftchyard (BIP 70.001) 5/30 115KV yard ground grid (BIP 77.001) 5/30 125 VDC control power (BIP 73.002, 003) 6/7 B. Prelfmfna Test Status Initial energfzatfon of the 115KY yard was completed Aprfl 29.

Condenser hydro has been completed. Make-up demfneralfzer system is expected to be operable by the end of May. Mechanical system, testing fs fn progress on the Water Treatment System with 99% of the flushing completed and 'initial operation of equipment fn progress. Field IAC work fs approximately '9'omplete for the Water Treatment System.

C. Major Problems

1. Re lacement Parts: Lack of replacement parts ,continues to a ec t e es ng effort. Preliminary meetings have CHOC been held in CHOC with Plant Service division personnel.

Engineering is responsible to develop a schedule to brfng this effort back on track.

2. Late release of s stems from construction: Twenty-seven current urnovers are e n sc e u e. artup and test fs working with construction to determine which of these turnovers are critical to testing.

3. Oesi n Chan es: Late design changes and modifications cont nue to mpact the overall, schedule and test program. For example, current design changes to correct the water hammer problem scheduled for release by October 29 will impact the Service Water System by eight weeks. As noted under Engineering, a change control procedure has been developed to effectively manage future changes.

61

yIII. STARTUP AND TEST (Continued) 4, S stemic Software: Current permanent plant file contents n cate a nee to increase the emphasis and activities for software processing to be completed to support system turnover. A moor effort is underway to define the records required for turnover and provide the required records to support the turnover.

5. Prospect Milestone Int ration: Star tup and test is continuing s rev .ew o e ota m lestone schedule. This initial effort should be completed by June 30.

62

STARTUP 4 TEST FLUSHES 2.0 1.8 1.6

~ ~~ t ~

r 1.4 I

I I

I 1.2 I 2 I f

1.0 I I

I I

.8 8

'4 I I

II I

I

/

I ua J FM AM J JASONO J FNAN J JASOk 0 J FNAN J JAg 1981 1985 1986 THIIU 10 Oc ~c Actual Scheduled 63'

STARTUP I TEST l

LOOP CAL BRAT ION 10 4l vl 6

I/

H Cee C

5 r'

g2 I 4 I I

/I II

~ X J FMAMJ JASOND J FMAMJ JASON D J FMAM J JAS 1084 1985 1086 THnu 10 ~ 01 as Late due to turnover problems and paper process. The procedures are being corrected to make the process more efficient.

Actual Scheduled

CHOC LOOP CAL1BRATION REPORT (Cumulative) 10 II

/

/

6II

/

CO 4 I

/

I I

II JFMAMJJ*8DMDJFMAMJJA'CDHDJFMAMJJA80 1984 1085 1886~

TH%V 10 Oi ~0 Actual Scheduled 65

PREOP/ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURES ISSUED (Cumu1ative) 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

4FNAOJJAiONDJPNANJ4AION04 PNASJJAo 1%Ii 10IS $ 004 1lllU H~ ~ I~N Scheduled Actual 66

ELEC PROCEDURES ISSUED (Cumulative) 30 29 28 27 I

r I

I 26 ~ ~ ~

CI IA 25 0 24 23 22 21 J F MAM J JASOHD J FMAM J JASON O J FMAM J JAS 1984 1985 1986 TNIIV 10 ~I ~4 Actual Scheduled 67

ISC PROCEDURES 1SSUEO (Cumulative) 46 44 42 40 w 38 I

I 36 AA I I

34 I

I 32 3D

/

Aa ze I

I 108'085 JFNANJJASONOJFNANJJAION DJFNANJJAt 1086 THIIU 10 ~1 Is o

Actual Scheduled The needed procedures are ln the revie~ cycle. 'Men complete, ~e w$ 11 be back on schedule.

68

MECH PROCEOURES ISSUEO (Cumulative) 10 6

W v1 r

5 o 4 I

/

/

/

J FKAK J JASOIID J FKAK J JASON 0 J FKAK J JAS 0 1984 1985 1986 THIIV 10 01'aI Actual Scheduled 69

STARTUP 6 TEST Initial Equipaent Operation 2.0 1.8 1.6 1,4 I

I g~ ).2 /

I I

1,0 I I

I

.8

/

I I

.6 I I

I I

/f

,J JFMAMJJASONOJFMAMJJASONOJFIIAII JJAS0 0984 1985 1986 ennu 10 01 ~ a Actual Scheduled 70

STARTUP I TEST CONTROL ClRCUlT VERFlCATEON 10 C /

/'

5 I

I I

4 1

/

/

//

3

//

r/

,/

J FMAM J JA80ND J FMAMJ JASDk D J FMAM J JAS 0 1981 1985 1986 TNIIV 10'01 ~ as Actual Scheduled Falling behind due to late tur novers . Host of the problen ls software.

71

A='ROVED E'r('.C EPTli3NS 36 BIP OWNED BY AOD (EXCEPT 103.001) 0.9 0.8 0.?

g a.4 so 0.6

~

~O C

0.5 ye 0.4 O

~ I~

0.3 0.2 0.1 4/20 584 581 8 681 681 5 6829 7/1 3 7/27 TOT ~,

1984 NEW ~~ COMP The exception list has increased due to accepting systems >Hah modifications pending to improve the testing capability and to meet critical path schedules.

72

jx. COST A ~ChF1 S Approximately $ 2,282 million* has been charged on the total project to date.

Approximately $ 300.3 million has been expended in 1984 as of May

20. This is 412.5 million under the 1984 forecast. The original

$ 615 million 1984 forecast has been revised to $ 630 million to reflect the recent contract re-negotiations between SMfC and NMPC for non-manual and headquarters services.

Approximately $ 71.8 million was expended in May versus the $ 60. 9 million planned.

B. Ma Cash Flow Variance Anal sis Vari ance Remarks SMEC Manual and mmlion over Tlie non~anna'I manpower waa Non-Manual 25 men over plan and substantial overtime was required. lt should be noted that the substantial planning and CAT efforts have required non-manual personnel, The manual staffing was 100 over plan as more craft was required for the painting and small bore efforts.

L. K. Comstock 41.5 million over Manual headcount was 81 men over plan; overtime was 37% actual vs.

19% planned. Non-manual overtime was 30K actual vs. 18% planned.

Higher than forecasted manpower and overtime were utilized in order to meet "new" milestone schedules that differ from the

$ 630 million plan.

ITT Gr innell $ 1.6 million over Manual headcount was 24 men over plan. None-manual headcount was 101 men over plan. Non-manual manpower overruns are basically due to support of the CAT action items. Manual manpower overrun also related to CAT action items.

-Continued-~---~--~--"--"-~

73

IX. COST (Continued),

Variance Remarks FPO's $ 2.8 million over Overrun is attributed to higher than anticipated staffing levels in the first quarter of 1984 and to an initial under estimate of the 1984 FPO cash requirements.

Other Misc. $ .7 million under Total Construction $ 5.7 million over Headqrtrs. Serices $ 1.1 million over May payment for March labor.

Overrun due to increased levels

~

of overtime to complete moor engineering items by March 31.

t Hdqtrs. Material $ 4.3 million over Oue primarily to a $ 3.5 milllion payment on P.O. EOllA (step up transfonaers) that was forecasted for payment in April.

Total Headqtrs. $ 5.4 million over Client Cost $ .2 million under TOTAL PROJECT m on over 74

1984 PROJECT CASH PLANS 675 NOTE: The $ 675 million projection is preliminary 600 based on the revised estimate. SWEC's official revised forecast will be sub-mitted in July, 1984.

400 O

O 0

X

~ 300 O

Q

/ /

200

/ /

PLAN ACTUAL VARIANCE Cur rent 60,863 71,830 10,967 over Period IOO Project 2,294,147 2,281,647 12,500 under to Date J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 l984 PRELIMINARY REVIsEo EsTIMATE PLAN AOJUSTEO APPROVEO PLAN ACTUAL 75

IX. COST (Continued)

B. Pro ect Estimate A review of the project estimate has been completed by the Budget and Cost Control Oepartment. The results of this review were presented to the Project Director on May 25, 1984. As a result of this presentation, some additional information will be requested from SPEC. SPEC will be requested to provide this information by the first week of June so the details of the estimate can be presented at the next Co-Tenant meeting on June 14, 1984.

An Estimate Status Breakdown showing Actual Expenses compared to the "To Go" 4/1/84 Budget as well as an analysis of remaining funds, will be provided starting in next month's report.

C. Cost Centers and Pro-Active Cash Flow The Project's costs will be divided into a number of smaller areas of responsibility called "cost centers". Individual managers will be responsible for monitoring, controlling and reporting costs for.

their respective "cost centers".

"Cost center's will also be used as the basis for the pro-active cash flow. A pro-active cash flow is a monitoring tool which will inform Project management of arly significant cost deviations from forecasted levels prior to their occurrence.

The cash flow for June is projected to be approximately $ 60 million, which is approximately $ 6 million over the plan. A sugary breakdown is as follows:

76

NMP2 PRO-ACTIVE CASH FLOW First Month (Dune)

Cost Center ~uet ro ect on Controllable Costs:

Construction 28,145 29,149 Engineering 7,715 8,562 Purchase Orders 8,663 14,924 Startup and Test 3,274 2,815 Client Costs 1,298 780 QA/QC 1, 542 1, 508 Less Controllable Costs:

Utilities 563 590 Insurance 510 510 Contractor Fees 772 772 Property Tax Total 52,482(1) 59,610 (1) The original forecast of $ 54,817 was adjusted to reflect the change in payment periods for'WEC'invoices.

77

COST (Continued)

0. Contin enc Mana ement Pro ram The Contingency Management Program was instituted to keep track of all items that were not included in the April 1, 1984 baseline estimate and therefore must be taken from contingency. The following is a sumnary of these items to date are broken into two categories: NMPC approved changes and potential changes. The approved changes are actual items that have already affected the estimate. The potential changes are items which management believes may have some exposure that could affect the estimate at a later time.

For this period, $ 488,220 in changes have been received. In addition, potential changes have been identified and are under review.

78

CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SUBMITTED TO NMPC FOR APPROVAL APRIL 1, 1984 TO MAY 25, 1984 CONTINGENCY ITEM ORANDONN ADDITION BALANCE Beginning Balance 4/1/84 S 254,111,400 Delay of Railroad S 70,060 254,181,460 Work to 1987 Johnson Controls - S 157,938 254,023,522 fabrication 4 purchase of panel materials Rockbestos Co.- 156,640 253,866,882 Additional aluminum sheath cable Rockbestos Co.- 73,425 253,793,457 twinaxial cable Raychem Corp.- 59,697 253,733,760 termination splicing materials American Industrial 27,600 253,706,160 Tech. - fabrication of outer refueling slab support ring Brand-Rex. Co.- 39,820 253,666,340 special purpose coaxial cable Fisher Controls Co. 38,160 253,628,180 TOTAL 483,220 79

POTENTIAL CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CHANGES (DOLLAR ESTIMATE ARE ORDER OF MAGNITUDE)

APRIL 1, 1984 TO MAY 25, 1984 CONTINGENCY ITEM DRAM)OWN ADDITION BALANCE Relocation of Tech- 500,000 500,000 nical Support Center

($ 400,000 Construction plus $ 100,000 Engineering)

Increases to 600 Y 400,000 900,000 control cable quantities Headquarter Manhour 69,700 969,700 increase for computer processing to create a report to compare TLO's to ECSIS.

NRC Initiated 3rd Party 6,000,000 6,969,700 Review Future Client Manpower 1,000,000 7,969,700 Additions Paid Overtime For 100,000 8,069,700 NMPC Personnel

RECORDS/INFORMATION MANAGEMENT Project Management has approved an NMPC/SWEC integrated records/

information management organization. Detailed work plans specifying organizational roles and responsibilities are under deve1opment.

Currently, a major portion of the Records Management function is integrated using NMPC/SWEC personnel, Shortly, the total integrated organization will be staffed and made operational having(7) Records Management, Document Control and information revised (computers).

/

A. Si ni ficant Activities A schedule was developed which identifies the key activities to be accompli shed to facilitate turnover of the records associated with the first six system turnovers from AOD to NMPC Startup 4 Test.

An overall schedule was devel oped to achieve steady state implementation of the Records Management Plan.

The Records Management Plan was revised, approved and issued-on May 21.

Roughly 30% of all Records Management concerns identified by NMPC gA Audit f37, SWEC Boston Records Management Evaluation, NMPC'nternal Audit, Records Management Workshop Items (CAT) and MAC Evaluation Teams have been closed. These items are being tracked to closure as part of the Records Management Enhancement Program.

Key Actions in the Near Term are planned as follows:

1. Revise and issue the NMP2 Required Records List to support the initial system turnovers.

2. Develop System Records Lists for first six systems scheduled for turnover.

3. Develop Records Management schedule input for 13-week look ahead schedule and milestone schedule.

4. Resolve the NMPC equality Assurance Record Review Requirements for initial system turnover.

5. 'valuation of closed contracts on the NMP2 Project for records commitment and the identification of associated required records.

81

X. RECOROS/INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Contf nued)

B. Record Turnover The follovtng are estimated percent completes of SWEC turnover of documentatlon to the NMPC Permanent Plant File.

Total Turnover of CHOC Oocuments .87S Complete Total Turnover of SWEC Sfte Oocuments 6% Comp'lets Total Turnover of all SWEC Oocuments 17% Complete The following are estimated percent compl etes of NMPC Syracuse turnover of documentation to the Permanent Plant File.

Total Turnover of HNPC Syracuse Oocuments 71S 'omplete The total estimated percent complete of turnover documentation to the PPF 19% Complete.

C. Permanent Plant Fjle Effort The following three pages ldentkfy planning curves and product)on figures for record receipt fflmfng and f ndexfng into the Permanent Plant File.

82

NMP2 PERMANENT PLANT FILE DOCUMENTS INDEXED

~ AAN454 PLANNED VS. ACTUAL Ilo TNOOMNOOI ACTML 5 coo 0

4 5544 C

V a5 IOOO H

I IOOO 1144 I

IOOO D

ooo X

~ oo 0

Io r 5- g g 5- >> r 4 5.

r g g CI- IN z c r ~ Oc z g55 gC CI ~IN 0C >r

% i ci C C o.

r+

54 z

<<r I-

+ r C 4 r+

45 z

'985 IN C5  % P 'N C5 aI 4 CI C > C 1983 1984

~

Noeo 2 1 -

- Fuel Load CoI5aerC1al 198.8 Ooeratkon The follov1ng table sumnarl zes the product1on level s of record rece1pt, preparat1on, f1lm1ng and 1ndex1ng 1nto the Permanent Plant F11 e.

Total To Percent

~Ar1 \ Oate ~Cem Iete A~et1 v1I Record Rece1pt and 80,178 109,506 2,018,967 25'A Preparat1on ( Inc 1udes Pages Pages Pages Aperture Cards)

Record N1crof1lm1ng l04,573 128,327 1,652,339 215 And Ver1f1cat1on Pages Pages Pages

( Includes Aperture Cards)

Computer Indexed 22,554 41,038 287, 896 Entr1es Entr1es Entr1es Entr1es Records Index1ng And 24,881 41,038 434,947 Computer Entry Oocuments Oocuments Oocuments Percent complete 's based on an est1mated comprls1ng 8,000,000 pages and 650,000 computer 1ndex entr1es requ1red 2,400,000 documents for Permanent Plant F1le entry by fuel load.

83

NMP2 PERMANENT PLANT FII.E PAGES ENTERED PLANNED VS. ACTUAL IIO COOUSCSOS) CS CUCC 0

~ ooo oooo coco A

0 oooo

~ ooo N

T oooo Il D Oooo I ooo

~

2 2

2

'g 4

c C

co 0 lo P

2 O

C 2 g g c.

C c

Os p 0g to 2 c-2 L C c.C r

So co p

2 i c- C N: c-c c 2 psc y< <

O co co P

O C

1983 1984 1985 1986 84

NMP2 PERMANENT PLANT FILE COMPUTER INDEXED NTRIES f PLANNED VS. ACTUAL uo foovccoo ~ $ coroco 9 C

0

~ oo V

T coo d

II

~ oo I

II coo 0

d X cN d

D d-:

coo T

II coo d

d

~

g g c cr co ~

g ~ g g cC co x c g g ~ o x z ac c v 0c px pa ~< ~ cov gc >s sp ~c cr co> c co 1984 t985 1988

.Fuel Load Iaote d - Cowaerc1al Operat1on 85

XI LICENSING A. FSAR Status A total of 849 questions relative to the FSAR and ER-OLS have been received from the NRC. As of this period, 660 responses are completed. Of the responses yet to be completed, 53 involved Instrument/Control questions and discrepancies. The attached table provides a detailed breakdown of the responses. Amendment ll to the FSAR will be sent to the NRC on June 5.

B. Safet Evaluation R ort NNPC received a fairly complete draft with the NRC Safety Evaluation Report. Three hundred fifty-one open items have been received of which 117 items have been closed to date.

~50.55f ) R Three 50.56(e) Reports were sent to the NRC.

1. Rosemount 510DU Racks 56(e) 84-15, Interim 30-day Report

2. Reactor Building Roof Design - Final Report

3. Back Pressure on Val ves furni shed by Cl ow Corporation 65(e)-84-10, Final Report Ins ection Re orts

l. I.E. Inspection 84-04 was received from the NRC. No violations identified.

2. I.E. Inspection 84-06 was received from the NRC. No violations identified.

One item was reported to the NRC as a potential deficiency under 10CFR50.55(e).

1. Electrical Cable Penetration Assemblies supplied by Unax Corporation - 55(e) 84-17.

E. Si nificant Issues The NRC review of the gA and Operations section of the application is currently being held up pend) ng receipt of additional information from NHPC regarding the recent or ganizational changes on the Project and gA. Unit 2 Licensing has prepared drafts of this material which is currently being reviewed by ()uality 86

XI. LICENSING (Contf nued)

Assurance and Project Management personnel. At the present time, Lfcensfng considers the major technically related licensing issue to be resolution of the 10CFR50 Appendix R requirement for independence between the control room and remote shutdown panel.

SMEC fs to provide a report on alternatives and a recorrrnended course of action by June 15. The major management related licensing issue fs considered to be the resolution of the CAT and SALP identified concerns with the Unit 2 gA Program.= An interim SALP evaluatfon by the NRC fs expected within the ext few months, which should indicate the NRC's assessment of NMPC's management actions to resolve these concerns.

87

STATUS OF RESPONSES TO 8RAHCH TECHNICAL UESTIONS NUH8ER OF RESPONSES SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSE CCHPLETICN Technical Question Questions 1984 1985 evens eeneived dnunleted ~0utstandtn utz June seat n.ee ER-OL5 51 IKSTRUHENT AND CON TROLSi 31 421 6 DISCREPANCIES RADIOLOGIC 470, 471 62 12 1 7 2 1 1 EFFLUENT 460, 451, 810 PIPING 210 113 55 STRUCTURE/220 SEI SHIC-230 GEOLOGY-231 HYDROLOGY-240 GEOTECH-241 STRUCTURAL AUDIT EQUIPHENT 13 10 QUAL.

270 271 FIRE 33 29 2 1 1 PROTECTION 280 PONER 118 105 13 6 3 3 1 1 SYSTEH 430 COiTAINHENT 67 56 3 7 REACTOR PHYSICS CORE PERFORH 480, 491, 492 REACTOR 49 43 1 1 SYSTDI 440 88

STATUS OF RESPOHSES TO BRAHCH TECHHICAL OUESTINS HUJSER OF RESPOHSES SCHEDULE FOR RESPOHSE CNPLETIOH Technfca'f ftuestfon Ouestfons 1984 1985 Aetna Received tnnnvlcted ~0utstandfn ~k June ~te t O.cc AUXILIARY 51 43 8 7 1 SYSTEN 410 STARTUP 6 41 28 13 10 TEST 640 OTHER 6) )0 1 8 100, 250, 251 252, 281, 311 450, 451, 620 630, 640, 730 TOTALS 660 189 15 92 18 4 7 The outstandfng Instnnnent and Control Ouestfons, and lhC Dfscrepancfes are befng dfscussed fn scheduled Neetfngs Ath the Comfssfon.