ML16347A594

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Followup to MRP-227-A Safety Evalution Report Dated October 24, 2016
ML16347A594
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/09/2016
From: Tom Loomis
Exelon Corp
To: Mozafari B
Plant Licensing Branch 1
References
MF6713
Download: ML16347A594 (3)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) <thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com>

Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 10:34 AM To: Mozafari, Brenda

Subject:

[External_Sender] Followup to MRP-227-A Safety Evalution Report dated October 24, 2016 (TAC NO. MF6713)

Brenda We concur.

1. Ginna attained its extended license by meeting the requirements of GALL Rev. 0 and is currently still under the requirements of GALL Rev. 0; however, the staff noted that the licensees submittal is consistent with GALL Rev.2 and GALL AMP XIM16.
2. Ginna will include these inspections as part of the augmented inspections, not the Section XI program, based on program enhancements resulting from industry programs.
3. The Aging Management Program (LR-RVI-PROGPLAN) will remain a living document subject to revision in the future.

Tom Loomis Exelon From: Mozafari, Brenda [1]

Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 1:02 PM To: Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc)

Cc: Cheruvenki, Ganesh; Medoff, James

Subject:

[EXTERNAL] MRP-227-a If you are available at 3pm today we would like to call to discuss these issues.

1. In Section 3.2.1 of the SER, it states that Ginna is in compliance with GALL Rev. 2
a. Ginna attained its extended license by meeting the requirements of GALL Rev. 0 and is currently still under the requirements of GALL Rev. 0 and NOT GALL Rev. 2 b.

My proposal-- Ginna attained its extended license by meeting the requirements of GALL Rev. 0 and is currently still under the requirements of GALL Rev. 0, however, the staff noted that the licensees submittal is consistent with GALL Rev.2 and GALL AMP XIM16.

2. Under the Licensee Evaluation section of section 3.2.1 of the SER, it states that The licensee further stated that the augmented inspections, based on program enhancements resulting from industry programs, will become part of the ASME Code,Section XI program.

My proposal The licensee further stated that the augmented inspections, based on program enhancements resulting from industry programs. , will become part of the ASME Code,Section XI program.

a. I have reviewed the AMP submittal and this statement is not in there. We are not sure why the MRP exams are to be part of the ISI program.

1

3. Section 3.3.6 discusses Action Item 7 of the NRC Safety Evaluation of MRP-227 Rev. 0. This action pertained to the existence of CASS Lower Support Columns.
a. The SER requests that Ginna revise Table 1.2 of Attachment E of the AMP submittal.
i. What is the expectation for the revision to Table 1.2 of Attachment E? This table was taken directly from MRP-227.

My proposalThe licensee should confirm that it will revise Table 1.2 of Attachment E of the AMP submittal to be consistent with the revised version of the staff approved MRP-227, Revision 1.

Brenda This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright belonging to Exelon Corporation or its affiliates ("Exelon"). This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies.

Exelon policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by Email communication. Exelon will not accept any liability in respect of such communications. -EXCIP 2

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3211 Mail Envelope Properties (58A872EE7553634D896C597A78B1709094E40839)

Subject:

[External_Sender] Followup to MRP-227-A Safety Evalution Report dated October 24, 2016 (TAC NO. MF6713)

Sent Date: 12/9/2016 10:34:29 AM Received Date: 12/9/2016 10:35:07 AM From: Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc)

Created By: thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com Recipients:

"Mozafari, Brenda" <Brenda.Mozafari@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: exchm-omf-23.exelonds.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3527 12/9/2016 10:35:07 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: