ML13310B106
| ML13310B106 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/05/1983 |
| From: | Baskin K Southern California Edison Co |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13310B104 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-42131 NUDOCS 8312080032 | |
| Download: ML13310B106 (6) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
)
COMPANY, and SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY )
DOCKET NO. 50-206 for a Class 104(b) License to Acquire, Possess, and Use a Utilization Facility as
)
Amendment No. 115 Part of Unit No. 1 of the San Onofre Nuclear
)
Generating Station
)
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY and SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, hereby submit Amendment No. 115.
This amendment consists of Proposed Change Nos. 128 and 129 to the Technical Specifications incorporated in Provisional Operating License No.
DPR-13 as Appendices A and B. Proposed Change No. 128 is a request to revise Sections 1.0, Definitions, 3.1, Reactor Coolant System, 3.8, Fuel Loading and Refueling, and Table 4.1.2, Minimum Equipment Check and Sampling Frequency of the Appendix A Technical Specifications.
Proposed Change No. 128 provides for functional redundancy in the decay heat removal methods during all modes of plant operation, and supersedes Section 3.1.2, Section 3.8 and Table 4.1.2 of Proposed Change No. 96 (Amendment No. 94), as submitted on December 1, 1980.
Proposed Change No. 129 is a request to revise Section 1.0, Definitions, and Section 5.0, Administrative Controls, of the Appendix B Technical Specifications (1) to make Appendix B self-consistent and consistent with NRC's Amendment No. 67 to the San Onofre Unit 1 provisional operating license and (2) to correct typographical errors in the existing text.
8312080032 831205 PDR ADOCK 05000206 P
-2 In the event of conflict, the information in this Amendment No. 115 supersedes the information previously submitted.
On the basis of the enclosed Description of Proposed Change and Safety Evaluation for each proposed change, it is concluded that:
(1) Proposed Changes 128 and 129 do not involve a significant hazards consideration as defined by 10 CFR 50.92; and (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by the proposed changes; and (3) this action will not result in a condition which significantly alters the impact of the station on the environment as described in the NRC Environmental Impact Statement.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22, Proposed Change Nos. 128 and 129, submitted herewith as Amendment No. 115, are determined not to require a fee.
The basis for this determination is that:
- 1) Proposed Change No. 96 was determined to be a Class III change, and a fee of $4,000.00 was provided with the December 1, 1980 application. Since submittal of Proposed Change No. 128 has been requested by the NRC staff to support the NRC's continuing review of Proposed Change No. 96, no additional fee is required.
- 2) Proposed Change No. 129 is to resolve inadvertent inconsistencies in the Technical Specifications due to incorporation of NRC's Amendment No. 67 and provide minor typographical corrections. On this basis, no additional fee is required.
-3 Subscribed on this.f day of____________,
1983.
Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY By:
P Kenneth P. Baskin Vice President Subscribed and sworn before me this J___
day of
/73 OFFICIAL SEAL' 3AGNES CRABTREE NOTArY PUBLIC -
CAUORNIA Nota Public in and for the County of LOS ANGELES COUNTY Los Angeles, State of California IL922PLGnE My Commission Expires:
r '7 /ffq Charles R. Kocher James A. Beoletto Attorneys for Southern California Edison Company By
\\James A. Beolet
-4 Subscribed on this IZ9 day of-.I)
I-e-/j, 1983.
Respectfully submitted, SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY By:
JC. Holcombe Vice President -
Power Supply Subscribed and swor to befo me this
//j4 day of OFFICIAL SEAL o ry Public in and for he C ty of LORAINE E. GRAY San Diego, State of Cali orni NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN Al
~SAN DIEGO COUNTY My Commission Expires:
My Commission Exp. April 6, 1986 David R. Pigott Samuel B. Casey Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe Attorneys for San Diego Gas & Electric Company By Samuel B. Casey
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of SOUTHERN
)
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
)
and SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC
)
Docket No. 50-206 COMPANY (San Onofre Nuclear
)
Generating Station Unit No. 1) )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of Amendment No. 115 was served on the following by deposit in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, on December the 6th
, 1983.
Henry J. McGurren, Esq.
Staff Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20545 David R. Pigott, Esq.
Samuel B. Casey, Esq.
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 600 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94111 John V. Morowski Bechtel Power Corporation P.O.. Box 60860, Terminal Annex Los Angeles, California 90060 Michael L. Mellor, Esq.
Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges Two Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111 Huey Johnson Secretary for Resources State of California 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, California 95814 Janice E. Kerr, General Counsel California Public Utilities Commission 5066 State Building San Francisco, California 94102
-2 J. Rengel Atomic Power Division Westinghouse Electric Corporation Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 A. I. Gaede P.O. Box 373 San Clemente, California 92672 Frederick E. John, Executive Director California Public Utilities Commission 5050 State Building San Francisco, California 94102 Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Jame
. Beoleto Assis t Counsel Southe nCalifornia Edison CompanV