Letter Sequence Response to RAI |
---|
TAC:ME1168, (Open) TAC:ME2609, Control Room Habitability, Deletion of E BAR Definition and Revision to RCS Specific Activity Tech Spec (Approved, Closed) TAC:ME2610, Control Room Habitability, Deletion of E BAR Definition and Revision to RCS Specific Activity Tech Spec (Approved, Closed) |
|
MONTHYEARL-PI-09-114, License Amendment Request to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Methodology2009-10-27027 October 2009 License Amendment Request to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Methodology Project stage: Request ML0935704512009-12-23023 December 2009 Acceptance Review of LAR to Adopt Alternative Source Term Methodology (TAC Nos. ME2609 & ME2610) Project stage: Acceptance Review L-PI-10-041, Response to Requests for Additional Information License Amendment Request to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Methodology2010-04-29029 April 2010 Response to Requests for Additional Information License Amendment Request to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Methodology Project stage: Response to RAI L-PI-10-046, Response to Requests for Additional Lnformation License Amendment Request to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Methodology2010-05-25025 May 2010 Response to Requests for Additional Lnformation License Amendment Request to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Methodology Project stage: Request L-PI-10-054, Response to Requests for Additional Information License Amendment Request to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Methodology2010-06-23023 June 2010 Response to Requests for Additional Information License Amendment Request to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Methodology Project stage: Response to RAI ML1018806202010-07-0808 July 2010 Notice of Forthcoming Meeting with Florida Power & Light, to Discuss with Representatives of Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) the Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4 Proposed Extended Power Uprate License Amendment Request Project stage: Meeting ML1023104112010-07-22022 July 2010 Meeting with NRC Extended Power Uprate (EPU) Project stage: Request ML1023002972010-07-23023 July 2010 Calculation No. GEN-PI-081, Revision 1, Eab, LPZ, and CR Doses Due to Steam Generator Tube Rupture Accident - AST, Attachment 3 Project stage: Other L-PI-10-076, Calculation No. GEN-PI-083, Revision 1, Locked Rotor Accident (LRA) Analysis Using AST, Attachment 52010-07-23023 July 2010 Calculation No. GEN-PI-083, Revision 1, Locked Rotor Accident (LRA) Analysis Using AST, Attachment 5 Project stage: Other ML1023002982010-07-23023 July 2010 Calculation No. GEN-PI-082, Revision 1, Control Rod Ejection Accident - AST, Attachment 4 Project stage: Other ML1023002962010-07-23023 July 2010 Calculation No. GEN-PI-078, Revision 1, Main Steam Line Break (MSLB) Accident Analysis Using AST, Attachment 2 Project stage: Other ML1022200872010-08-10010 August 2010 Forthcoming Meeting with Northern States Power Company - Minnesota (Nspm), to Discuss the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Steam Generator Margin-to-Overfill Analysis as It Relates to Pingp'S License Amendment Request to Adopt... Project stage: Meeting ML1023002952010-08-12012 August 2010 Response to Requests for Additional Information License Amendment Request to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Methodology Project stage: Response to RAI ML1023805712010-08-25025 August 2010 Meeting Presentation Alternative Source Term Steam Generator Tube Rupture Margin to Overfill Evaluation - Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Project stage: Request ML1023802392010-09-21021 September 2010 Summary of Meeting with Florida Power & Light, on Turkey Point'S Proposed Extended Power Uprate Application (TAC Nos. ME1167 and ME1168) Project stage: Meeting ML1025903972010-09-23023 September 2010 Prairie Island, Summary of Meeting with Northern States Power Company to Discuss the Alternative Source Term License Amendment Request Project stage: Meeting ML1032205552010-11-15015 November 2010 Draft RAI Concerning AST SGTR Mto Analysis Project stage: Draft RAI ML1032205572010-11-15015 November 2010 Draft RAI Concerning AST SGTR Mto Analysis Project stage: Draft RAI L-PI-10-112, Prairie Lsland Nuclear Generating Plant Units 1 and 2, Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Methodology (TAC Nos. ME2609 and ME26102)2010-12-17017 December 2010 Prairie Lsland Nuclear Generating Plant Units 1 and 2, Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Methodology (TAC Nos. ME2609 and ME26102) Project stage: Response to RAI ML1110400212011-04-0404 April 2011 NRR E-mail Capture - Prairie Island - Revised Alternative Source Term LAR Draft RAI 4-4-2011 Project stage: Draft RAI ML1035404332011-05-12012 May 2011 Requests for Additional Information (RAI) Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term Project stage: RAI L-PI-11-060, Response to Requests for Additional Lnformation (RAI) Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodology2011-06-22022 June 2011 Response to Requests for Additional Lnformation (RAI) Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodology Project stage: Other ML1118226692011-06-29029 June 2011 PINGP - AST Methodology - ME2609 and ME2610 Project stage: Other L-PI-11-068, Response to Requests for Additional Information (RAI) Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodology2011-07-11011 July 2011 Response to Requests for Additional Information (RAI) Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodology Project stage: Response to RAI ML1120819672011-07-20020 July 2011 E-mail Prairie Island - Request for Clarification of June 22, 2011 Request for Additional Information (RAI) Response Project stage: RAI L-PI-11-079, Response to Requests for Additional Lnformation (RAI) Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodology2011-08-0909 August 2011 Response to Requests for Additional Lnformation (RAI) Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodology Project stage: Other ML1125503562011-09-0101 September 2011 Ngp - Draft RAI Concerning SGTR Instrumentation for Alternative Source Term LAR Project stage: Draft RAI ML1125503572011-09-0101 September 2011 PINGP Draft RAI - AST Instrumentation Project stage: Draft RAI ML1131100842011-11-0202 November 2011 Alternative Source Term Draft Request for Additional Information Project stage: Draft RAI ML1131100942011-11-0202 November 2011 RAI Prairie PINGP, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: RAI L-PI-11-099, Response to Requests for Additional Information Regarding Regulatory Guide 1.97 Instrumentation Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodology2011-12-0808 December 2011 Response to Requests for Additional Information Regarding Regulatory Guide 1.97 Instrumentation Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodology Project stage: Response to RAI L-PI-12-010, Response to Requests for Additional Information Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term Methodology2012-02-13013 February 2012 Response to Requests for Additional Information Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term Methodology Project stage: Response to RAI L-PI-12-013, Response to Requests for Additional Information Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodology2012-02-24024 February 2012 Response to Requests for Additional Information Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodology Project stage: Response to RAI L-PI-12-082, Response to Requests for Additional Information (RAI) Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodology2012-09-13013 September 2012 Response to Requests for Additional Information (RAI) Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodology Project stage: Response to RAI ML1125212892013-01-22022 January 2013 Issuance of Amendments Adoption of Alternative Source Term Methodology Project stage: Approval L-PI-13-111, Notification of Alternative Source Term (AST) Implementation and Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement2014-01-13013 January 2014 Notification of Alternative Source Term (AST) Implementation and Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement Project stage: Other 2010-09-23
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Letter type:L
MONTHYEARL-PI-23-034, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.7.8, Cooling Water (Cl) System,2024-01-0202 January 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.7.8, Cooling Water (Cl) System, L-PI-23-035, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications Section 5.6.6, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure and Temperature Limits Report2023-12-20020 December 2023 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications Section 5.6.6, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure and Temperature Limits Report L-PI-23-033, Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.8.1, Surveillance Requirement 3.8.1.2, Note 32023-12-0505 December 2023 Supplement to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.8.1, Surveillance Requirement 3.8.1.2, Note 3 L-PI-23-025, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.8.1, Surveillance Requirement 3.8.1.2, Note 32023-09-28028 September 2023 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.8.1, Surveillance Requirement 3.8.1.2, Note 3 L-PI-23-023, Baffle Former Bolts Alternate Aging Management Strategy2023-09-11011 September 2023 Baffle Former Bolts Alternate Aging Management Strategy L-PI-23-018, License Amendment Request to Revise ISFSI Technical Specification 4.4 to Allow Use of a Code Alternative to ASME Code, NB-5130, Examination of Weld Edge Preparation Surfaces, for the TN-40HT2023-07-14014 July 2023 License Amendment Request to Revise ISFSI Technical Specification 4.4 to Allow Use of a Code Alternative to ASME Code, NB-5130, Examination of Weld Edge Preparation Surfaces, for the TN-40HT L-PI-23-006, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.7.8 Required Actions2023-06-22022 June 2023 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.7.8 Required Actions L-PI-23-016, 2022 10 CFR 50.46 LOCA Annual Report2023-06-14014 June 2023 2022 10 CFR 50.46 LOCA Annual Report L-PI-23-010, Annual Report of Individual Monitoring2023-04-27027 April 2023 Annual Report of Individual Monitoring L-PI-23-007, Supplement to Application to Revise Technical Specification Section 5.6.6, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR)2023-03-28028 March 2023 Supplement to Application to Revise Technical Specification Section 5.6.6, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR) L-PI-23-005, CFR 50.55a Requests Nos. 1-RR-5-15 and 2-RR-5-15, Proposed Use of Subsequent ASME Code Edition and Addenda in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(4)(iv)2023-03-0303 March 2023 CFR 50.55a Requests Nos. 1-RR-5-15 and 2-RR-5-15, Proposed Use of Subsequent ASME Code Edition and Addenda in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(4)(iv) L-PI-23-001, Day Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report2023-01-30030 January 2023 Day Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report L-PI-22-047, Resubmittal of Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP) 2018 Unit 1 180-Day Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report2022-12-21021 December 2022 Resubmittal of Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP) 2018 Unit 1 180-Day Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report L-PI-22-020, Application to Revise Technical Specification Section 5.6.6, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR)2022-12-0202 December 2022 Application to Revise Technical Specification Section 5.6.6, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR) L-PI-22-040, Supplement to Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-577, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections2022-10-0606 October 2022 Supplement to Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-577, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections L-PI-22-037, Updated Approach for Prairie Island Unit 1 and Unit 2 Baffle Former Bolts2022-09-20020 September 2022 Updated Approach for Prairie Island Unit 1 and Unit 2 Baffle Former Bolts L-PI-22-032, CFR 50.46 LOCA Annual Report2022-06-16016 June 2022 CFR 50.46 LOCA Annual Report L-PI-22-033, Response to Request for Additional Information Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, Amendment to Adopt 24-Month Operating Cycles2022-06-10010 June 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, Amendment to Adopt 24-Month Operating Cycles L-PI-22-003, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-577, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections2022-06-0707 June 2022 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-577, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections L-PI-22-024, Supplement to Application for License Amendment to Implement 24-Month Operating Cycle2022-03-0707 March 2022 Supplement to Application for License Amendment to Implement 24-Month Operating Cycle L-PI-21-047, Response to Request for Additional Information 24-Month Cycle Amendment Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 22021-12-0707 December 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information 24-Month Cycle Amendment Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 L-PI-21-045, Response to Request for Additional Information Cooling Water System License Amendment Request2021-11-0404 November 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information Cooling Water System License Amendment Request L-PI-21-029, Exigent License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.7.8 to Allow a One-Time Extension of the Completion Time of Required Action B.12021-10-0707 October 2021 Exigent License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.7.8 to Allow a One-Time Extension of the Completion Time of Required Action B.1 L-PI-21-006, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.3.1, Reactor Trip System (RTS) Instrumentation, to Incorporate Installed Bypass Test Capability for the Power Range RTS Functions2021-10-0202 October 2021 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.3.1, Reactor Trip System (RTS) Instrumentation, to Incorporate Installed Bypass Test Capability for the Power Range RTS Functions L-PI-21-032, Response to Request for Additional Information Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-471 and 571-T for Prairie Island2021-09-30030 September 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-471 and 571-T for Prairie Island L-PI-21-016, Application for License Amendment to Implement 24-Month Operating Cycle2021-08-0606 August 2021 Application for License Amendment to Implement 24-Month Operating Cycle L-PI-21-027, 2020 10 CFR 50.46 LOCA Annual Report2021-06-28028 June 2021 2020 10 CFR 50.46 LOCA Annual Report L-PI-21-023, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 2020 Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Report2021-05-14014 May 2021 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - 2020 Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Report L-PI-21-007, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-471, Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alterations in Actions and Notes2021-04-19019 April 2021 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-471, Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alterations in Actions and Notes L-PI-20-050, Request for a One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements, Due to COVID-19 Pandemic2020-10-0707 October 2020 Request for a One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements, Due to COVID-19 Pandemic L-PI-20-051, Supplement to Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-547, Clarification of Rod Position Requirements2020-09-28028 September 2020 Supplement to Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-547, Clarification of Rod Position Requirements L-PI-20-026, Response to Request for Additional Information: License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiativ2020-09-0101 September 2020 Response to Request for Additional Information: License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4 L-PI-20-035, = Request for Revision to Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Capsule Removal Schedule2020-07-28028 July 2020 = Request for Revision to Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Capsule Removal Schedule L-PI-20-023, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Response to Request for Additional Information: License Amendment Request to Expand the Storage Capacity of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)2020-06-10010 June 2020 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Response to Request for Additional Information: License Amendment Request to Expand the Storage Capacity of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) L-PI-20-014, Supplement to License Amendment Request: Expand the Storage Capacity of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI2020-04-29029 April 2020 Supplement to License Amendment Request: Expand the Storage Capacity of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI L-PI-20-004, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications (TS) to Remove Note I from Limiting Condition for Operating (LCO) 3.4.12 and LCO 3.4.132020-03-30030 March 2020 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications (TS) to Remove Note I from Limiting Condition for Operating (LCO) 3.4.12 and LCO 3.4.13 L-PI-20-001, License Amendment Request to Address Issues Identified in Westinghouse Nuclear Safety Advisory Letter NSAL-09-5, Revision 1, and NSAL-15-12020-01-29029 January 2020 License Amendment Request to Address Issues Identified in Westinghouse Nuclear Safety Advisory Letter NSAL-09-5, Revision 1, and NSAL-15-1 L-PI-19-041, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-547, Clarification of Rod Position Requirements2019-12-23023 December 2019 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-547, Clarification of Rod Position Requirements L-PI-19-031, License Amendment Request: Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4b2019-12-16016 December 2019 License Amendment Request: Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4b L-PI-19-040, License Amendment Request: Revise Technical Specification 5.5.14 to Permanently Extend Containment Leakage Rate Test Frequency2019-10-0707 October 2019 License Amendment Request: Revise Technical Specification 5.5.14 to Permanently Extend Containment Leakage Rate Test Frequency L-PI-19-038, Submittal of Revised Pressure and Temperature Limits Report2019-09-19019 September 2019 Submittal of Revised Pressure and Temperature Limits Report L-PI-19-037, Response to Request for Additional Information: 10 CFR 50.55a Requests Nos. 1-RR-5-10 and 2-RR-5-10, Proposed Alternative to Reactor Vessel Inservice Inspection (ISI) Intervals2019-09-16016 September 2019 Response to Request for Additional Information: 10 CFR 50.55a Requests Nos. 1-RR-5-10 and 2-RR-5-10, Proposed Alternative to Reactor Vessel Inservice Inspection (ISI) Intervals L-PI-19-025, Request to Approve Site-Specific Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Model for Flowserve N-Seal Abeyance Seal and Dynamic Testing for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP)2019-08-27027 August 2019 Request to Approve Site-Specific Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Model for Flowserve N-Seal Abeyance Seal and Dynamic Testing for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP) L-PI-19-029, Supplement to Response to Request for Additional Information: Application to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components For...2019-08-0505 August 2019 Supplement to Response to Request for Additional Information: Application to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components For... L-PI-19-002, 10 CFR 50.55a Requests Nos. 1-RR-5-10 and 2-RR-5-10, Proposed Alternative to Reactor Vessel Inservice Inspection (ISI) Intervals for Prairie Island, Unit 1 and Unit 22019-06-13013 June 2019 10 CFR 50.55a Requests Nos. 1-RR-5-10 and 2-RR-5-10, Proposed Alternative to Reactor Vessel Inservice Inspection (ISI) Intervals for Prairie Island, Unit 1 and Unit 2 L-PI-19-014, Response to Request for Additional Information: Application to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors2019-04-29029 April 2019 Response to Request for Additional Information: Application to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors L-PI-19-003, Request for Revision to Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Capsule Removal Schedule for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP)2019-02-0404 February 2019 Request for Revision to Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Capsule Removal Schedule for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP) L-PI-19-006, Emergency License Amendment Request Regarding One-Time Extension for Technical Specification Completion Time Requirements2019-01-29029 January 2019 Emergency License Amendment Request Regarding One-Time Extension for Technical Specification Completion Time Requirements L-PI-19-005, Online Reference Portal for NRC Review of License Amendment Request to Implement 10 CFR 50.692019-01-15015 January 2019 Online Reference Portal for NRC Review of License Amendment Request to Implement 10 CFR 50.69 L-PI-18-063, Response to Request for Additional Information: Revise License Condition Associated with Implementation of NFPA 8052018-12-0606 December 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information: Revise License Condition Associated with Implementation of NFPA 805 2024-01-02
[Table view] |
Text
@
A Xcel EnergyB L-PI-11-068 10 CFR 50.90 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Units 1 and 2 Dockets 50-282 and 50-306 Renewed License Nos. DPR-42 and DPR-60 Response to Requests for Additional Information (RAI) Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodoloav (TAC Nos. ME2609 and ME2610)
In a letter to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated October 27, 2009 (Agencywide Documents and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML093160583), the Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation doing business as Xcel Energy (hereafter "NSPM"), requested an amendment to the Technical Specifications (TS) for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP). The proposed amendment requested adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) methodology, in addition to TS changes supported by AST design basis accident radiological consequence analyses.
The NRC Staff sent draft requests for additional information (RAls) via electronic mail on September 21, 2010 to support their review of the submittal. In a letter to the NRC dated December 17,2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML103510322),
NSPM provided a response to the Containment and Ventilation Systems Branch (SCVB) RAI, SCVB-1. The NRC Staff sent a clarification question via electronic mail on April 1, 201 1, which was discussed during a subsequent teleconference held on April 5, 201 1.
The enclosure to this letter provides the response to the SCVB clarification question discussed during the April 5, 201 1 teleconference. The response was discussed during a May 31, 201 1 teleconference and provides the additional information requested by the NRC during the teleconference.
NSPM submits this supplement in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.90.
1717 Wakonade Drive East Welch, Minnesota 55089-9642 Telephone: 651.388.1121
Document Control Desk Page 2 The supplemental information provided in this letter does not impact the conclusions of the Determination of No Significant Hazards Consideration and Environmental Assessment presented in the October 27, 2009 submittal, supplemented by letters dated April 29, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML101200083), May 25,2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML101460064), June 23, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML101760017), August 12,2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML102300295), December 17,2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML103510322) and June 22,2011 (ADAMS Accession No.ML111740145).
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91, NSPM is notifying the State of Minnesota of this LAR supplement by transmitting a copy of this letter to the designated State Official.
If there are any questions or if additional information is needed, please contact Mr. Gregory Myers, P.E., at 651-267-7263.
Summan, of Commitments This letter contains no new commitments or revisions to existing commitments.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on flJ22a Mark A. Schimmel L.
Site Vice President, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power Company - Minnesota Enclosure cc: Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, PINGP, USNRC Resident Inspector, PINGP, USNRC State of Minnesota
ENCLOSURE TO L-PI-11-068 Response to SCVB Clarification Question 10 pages follow
ENCLOSURE Response to Requests for Additional Information (RAI) Associated with Adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) Methodology (TAC Nos.
ME2609 and ME2610)
In a letter to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated October 27, 2009 (Agencywide Documents and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML093160583), the Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation doing business as Xcel Energy (hereafter "NSPM"), requested an amendment to the Technical Specifications (TS) for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP). The proposed amendment requested adoption of the Alternative Source Term (AST) methodology, in addition to TS changes supported by AST design basis accident radiological consequence analyses.
The NRC Staff sent draft requests for additional information (RAls) via electronic mail on September 21, 2010 to support their review of the submittal. In a letter to the NRC dated December 17,2010 (ADAMS Accession No. MLI 03510322),
NSPM provided a response to the Containment and Ventilation Systems Branch (SCVB) RAI, SCVB-1. The NRC Staff sent a clarification question via electronic mail on April 1, 201 1, which was discussed during a subsequent teleconference held on April 5, 201 1.
This enclosure provides the response to the SCVB clarification question discussed during the April 5, 201 1 teleconference. The response was discussed during a May 31, 201 1 teleconference and provides the additional information requested by the NRC during the teleconference.
CONTAINMENT AND VENTILATION SYSTEMS BRANCH (SCVB)
Draft NRC RAI - SCVB-I Calculation No. GEN-PI-079, "post-LOCA EAB, LPZ and CR Doses - A S 7 (Attachment 6 to Enclosure to the October 27, 2009 application), assumes a specific Shield Building leakage rate as shown on Table 2 (Page 64 of 257 of the calculation). This leakage rate helps determine the recirculation and holdup time of any source term leaking into the Shield Building annulus.
Describe the periodic verification performed to assure that the Shield Building leakage rate remains within the values assumed in the accident analyses.
Page 1 of 10
Enclosure Response to SCVB Clarification Question NSPM NRC Clarification Question - sent via email dated 4/1/2011 The NRC staff has reviewed the subject RAI response and has the following clarification question:
Ref Table 2 on Page 64 of 257 of Attachment 6 to the Enclosure to the October 27th, 2009 application.
In this table we are focusing on two columns: (I)[shield building ventilation system] SBVS Filtered Venting (cfm) and (2) Shield Building Leakage (cfm). In accordance with Table 2, the SB VS vents at a specific rate (cfm) at various times following a LOCA, and the Shield Building leaks at a specific rate (cfm) following a LOCA.
How often does the licensee verify the venting and/or leakage rate(s) represented in Table 2?
NSPM Response Svstem Operation As described on Pages 8 and 9 of the Enclosure to the Reference 1 LAR:
The shield building ventilation system (SBVS) operates in the event of a loss of coolant accident to draw and maintain a negative pressure in the shield building. In addition, the system recirculates and filters the air prior to release. The system is shown on Figure 3.0-1. This system consists of two independent and redundant filter trains, with the exception that some of the ducting is common to both trains (e.g. return header in the shield building and the shield building vent stack are common). Each train consists of a heater, a prefilter, a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter, and an activated charcoal adsorber section for removal of gaseous activity (principally iodines). Two 100-percent-capacity exhaust and recirculation fans serve the redundant trains. Heaters, ductwork, dampers, and instrumentation also form part of the system. The heaters function to reduce the relative humidity of the air stream. When initiated the SBVS exhausts to draw a negative pressure in the shield building annulus area outside of the reactor containment vessel. After a pre-set negative pressure is established a recirculation damper opens to allow the system to recirculate a portion of the total air flow while exhausting to maintain a negative pressure. The SBVS returns the recirculation flow to a ring header near the bottom of the shield building annulus. The SBVS draws flow from near the top of the reactor containment vessel. The configuration and orientation of the return air ring header relative to the SBVS intake points promote mixing.
Page 2 of 10
Enclosure Response to SCVB Clarification Question NSPM Figure 3.0-1 in the Enclosure to the Reference 1 LAR provides a simplified figure of the SBVS.
Radiological Consequence Analysis with Alternative Source Term - SBVS Model For modeling SBVS performance, the radiological consequence analysis considers two time frames; (1) initial drawdown, and (2) equilibrium operation.
These two time frames are modeled as follows (specific design inputs used in the post-LOCA radiological consequence analysis are shown in Table 3.3-8 of the Enclosure to the Reference 1 LAR):
(1) Drawdown - The drawdown time period is the initial 22 minutes.
As described above, during this time period the SBVS fans are drawing a negative pressure in the shield building annulus. The dose analysis takes no credit for holdup or filtration during this time period by assuming that containment leakage to the annulus is released directly to the environment through the shield building vent stack.
(2) Equilibrium -After the initial 22 minutes, the SBVS is operating in an equilibrium condition where the ventilation system exhaust is equal to inleakage and a negative pressure is maintained in the annulus. It is noted that the dampers are open and do not modulate to maintain a set negative pressure. The negative pressure is a function of the inleakage. That is, the higher the inleakage, the less negative the pressure that will be maintained.
As shown in Table 3.3-8 of the Enclosure of the LAR, the dose analysis assumes an exhaust flow rate of 2000 cfm. The flow rate of 2000 cfm is based on an exhaust flow rate of 1000 cfm, which is doubled to simulate 50% mixing in the annulus.
SBVS Testinq Periodic verification of the capability of the SBVS is performed per Technical Specification Surveillance Requirements. Specifically, the capability for the shield building ventilation system to produce and maintain a negative pressure in the shield building annulus is verified every 31 days per Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.6.10.2. The Bases for SR 3.6.10.2 states:
The SBVS produces a negative pressure to prevent leakage from the building. SR 3.6.10.2 verifies that the shield building can be rapidly drawn down to -2.00 inch water gauge and maintains a pressure equal to or more negative than -1.82 inches of water gauge in the annulus after the recirculation dampers open and equilibrium is established. Equilibrium negative pressure equal to or more negative than -1.82 inches water gage is that predicted for non-accident conditions and leakage equal to 75% of the maximum allowable shield building inleakage (Reference 2).
Enclosure Response to SCVB Clarification Question NSPM Establishment of this pressure is confirmed by SR 3.6.10.2, which demonstrates that the shield building can be drawn down to 5-2.0 inches of vacuum water gauge in the annulus using one SBVS train.
Note: Reference 2 in the Bases for SR 3.6.10.2 is Reference 2 of this Enclosure.
The monthly surveillance test of the SBVS, also known as a drawdown test, confirms that the following acceptance criteria are satisfied:
0 Minimum pressure equal to or more negative than 2.0" H20 (vacuum condition) in the annulus.
Equilibrium minimum pressure in the annulus equal to or more negative than 1.82" H20.
Bases for SBVS Testing Acceptance Criteria The maximum allowable shield building leakage rate was depicted by Technical Specification (TS) Figure 4.4-1. TS Figure 4.4-1 was removed by License Amendments 158 and 149, for Units Iand 2, respectively.
Leakage at an equilibrium pressure of 1.82" H20 corresponds to 75% of the maximum allowable shield building in-leakage as cited in the Bases for SR 3.6.10.2. Figure 1 on Page 7 (Reference 2, Figure 5) provides two curves; one showing the maximum allowable leakage rate (former TS Figure 4.4-1) and the other showing the acceptable shield building leakage test results. As shown, the acceptable shield building leakage test results are 75% of the maximum allowable leakage rate. Furthermore, Figure 1 shows that at 1.82" H20 the maximum allowable leakage rate is 1000 cfm. Figure 2 on Page 8 (Reference 2, Figure 4), shows the SBVS pull-down transient with the Technical Specification maximum leakage rate (i.e., the acceptable shield building leakage test results from Figure 1). As shown on Figure 2, the SBVS pull-down transient curve, the equilibrium differential pressure corresponding to an inleakage rate of 75% of Figure 5 is 1.82" H20.
Reference 3 provided the results of Unit Iinitial testing program for the SBVS.
An objective of the testing was to verify that the system performance confirmed the SBVS pull-down transient computer model prediction. This was accomplished by a comparison of the curves generated by the computer model using the measured leakage rate of the shield building. For this testing, the shield building leakage rate was determined by measuring the steady state SBVS exhaust flow rate. As described in the conclusion on page 12 of Reference 3, the computer model predictions were conservative compared to the actual drawdown testing. Furthermore, an additional comparison of computer model prediction vs actual system performance is shown on Figure 3 on page 9 (Figure 7 of Reference 2). The computer model input parameters shown on Page 4 of 10
Enclosure Response to SCVB Clarification Question NSPM Figure 3 are identical to those of the noted measured drawdown test (e.g., the test results at a leakage rate of 369 cfm at 2.6" H20were predicted by the computer model). As shown on Figure 3, the computer model provides an accurate prediction of the SBVS drawdown transient.
The pre-operational testing demonstrated that the resultant negative pressure in the annulus is directly related to the leakage rate and the leakage rate is the same as the exhaust flow rate at equilibrium conditions. With the system operating in an equilibrium condition an increase in the leakage rate will result in a decrease in the negative pressure condition. For example, if the leakage rate is greater than 75% of the maximum allowable leakage rate the equilibrium acceptance criteria would not be satisfied. USAR Appendix G, Section G.3 provides a description of the SBVS analytical model. This same model is referred to in the initial testing reports provided to the Atomic Energy Commission. As described in Section G.3.7, sensitivity studies were included as part of the analysis performed using this model. One of the parameters considered as part of these sensitivity studies was the shield building leakage.
The results from the studies of varying shield building leakage are shown on Figure G.3-I 1 and G.3-12. As shown on Figure G.3-11 increasing the shield building leak rate results in a less negative pressure condition. This sensitivity of pressure in the annulus to the inleakage rate is consistent with the design and operation of the system. The dampers do not modulate to maintain a set pressure, i.e., SBVS is in equilibrium (Reference 3, Page 3). This is consistent with USAR Appendix G, Page G.3-8, which shows that the pressure drop across the dampers is independent of damper position since they do not modulate.
Prior Approval Historv As described in Reference 2, in addition to the acceptance criteria for equilibrium pressure in the shield building annulus, there was also an acceptance criteria to confirm the actual shield building leakage rate by measuring the SBVS exhaust flow. At that time, Technical Specification 4.4.A.3 required leak testing of the shield building and Technical Specification 4.4.B.1 required a drawdown test of the shield building. In a letter dated December 3, 1982, Northern States Power proposed to delete the leak testing for the shield building (Reference 5). The NRC approved this deletion in a letter dated February 23, 1983 (Reference 4).
The NRC Safety Evaluation Report (starting on Page 10) concludes the following:
Specifications 4.4.B.1 and 4.4.B.2 meet the provision of Appendix J Section IV B since operability is demonstrated by meeting the drawdown performance specified in the TS 4.4.B. 1 for the shield building and when a measureable negative pressure is achieved within 6 minutes specified for the auxiliary building in TS 4.4.B.2.
Page 5 of 10
Enclosure Response to SCVB Clarification Question NSPM 0 Results of a special functional test of the shield building and the auxiliary building special ventilation system performed in accordance with TS 4.4.A.3~were provided during the plant initial start period in a report dated April 9, 1976. The results were reviewed and were found to be acceptable.
The requirements of TS 4.4.A.3, 4.4.A.3a14.4.A.3b and 4.4.A.3~do not serve a meaningful purpose and therefore are no longer necessary since their functions are adequately addressed in the existing TS 4.4.B.1 and 4.4.B.2 and therefore may be deleted.
Therefore, based on this NRC approval, the leak testing of the shield building by measurement of the SVBS exhaust flow was not required as it was adequately covered by the drawdown testing. This same drawdown testing is currently performed by the monthly surveillance test of the SBVS.
Impacts from Alternative Source Term (AST)
Implementation of a new source term has no impact on the operation of the SBVS. The source term is independent of the operation of the SBVS. It is noted that reduced credit is taken for the SBVS. In the current dose analysis, both the HEPA filter and the charcoal adsorber are credited. In the AST dose analysis, only the HEPA filter is credited.
Conclusion In conclusion, the current methods used to test the SBVS are acceptable and additional exhaust flow or leakage testing is not required, as described in more detail above. Every 31 days, SBVS surveillance testing of differential pressure confirms that the shield building in-leakage (equal to exhaust flow) is less than or equal to 750 cfm, which is 75% of the maximum allowable shield building in-leakage. This confirms that the SBVS leakage and exhaust do not exceed the values used in the dose analysis.
In summary:
SBVS drawdown testing performed in accordance with SR 3.6.10.2 confirms that the shield building in-leakage (equal to exhaust flow) is less than or equal to 750 cfm, which is 75% of the maximum allowable shield building in-leakage.
This drawdown testing confirms that leakage and exhaust do not exceed values used in the dose analysis.
e The NRC has previously approved the acceptability of drawdown testing and concluded that leak rate testing is not necessary; i.e., it does not serve any meaningful purpose.
Page 6 of 10
Enclosure Response to SCVB Clarification Question NSPM Figure 1 - As-Built Shield Building Leakage Limit Note: this is Figure 5 of Reference 2.
Enclosure Response to SCVB Clarification Question NSPM Figure 2 - Shield Building Pull-Down Transient Computer Model Results axis) "annulus to auxiliary building differential pressure (in WC)"
Enclosure Response to SCVB Clarification Question NSPM Figure 3 - Computer Model Prediction Versus Actual Test Results Note: this is Figure 7 of Reference 2.
Page 9 of 10
Enclosure Response to SCVB Clarification Question NSPM References
- 1. NSPM Letter to US NRC, "License Amendment Request (LAR) to Adopt the Alternative Source Term Methodology," dated October 27, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML093160583).
- 2. "Report to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Operating Reactors - Prairie lsland Containment Systems Special Analysis,"
dated April 9, 1976.
- 3. Northern States Power Company - Prairie lsland Nuclear Generating Plant, "Report to the United States Atomic Energy Commission Directorate of Licensing," Dated July 9, 1974.
- 4. Northern States Power Company, Prairie lsland Nuclear Generating Plant Unit 1 and 2 Amendment 62 to Operating License DPR-42 and Amendment 56 to Operating License DPR-60, February 23, 1983 (ADAMS Accession Number ML022180360).
- 5. Letter from Northern States Power Company, Prairie lsland Nuclear Power Plant to Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, "Revision No. 1 to License Amendment Request dated August 7, 1975 - Containment Leakage Rate Testing Technical Specification Changes," December 3, 1982.
Page 10 of 10