ML062680196
| ML062680196 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Kewaunee, Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 07/03/2002 |
| From: | Michael Kunowski NRC/RGN-III |
| To: | James Heller - No Known Affiliation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2006-0113 | |
| Download: ML062680196 (4) | |
Text
f.
From: Michael Kunowski To: James Heller; OaC3 Date: Wed, Jul 3, 2002 12:36 PM
Subject:
KEWAUNEE/POINT BEACH ISSUE Here's what I have on the issue I spoke with you this morning. I called Terry Madeda, who has both Kewaunee and Point Beach. He is assessing the info and will let me know what I should do next.
I Received By: MIKE KUNOWSKI
-,ALLIEGATION RECEIIPT FORMVI P~leapseemalthe following Inform*ationto OAC3, JKI-, a~dALK, IRecelpt Date: WEDNESDAY, JULY 3,2002 Receipt Method (meeting, phone call, letter) MESSAGE LEFT ON RESIDENCE OFFICE PHONE-PLANT PHONE LINE, NOT REGULAR OFFICE PHONE LINE, TUESDAY AT 4:44 P.M.,
APPARENTLY JULY 2,2002
- ACILITY' Facility Name POINT BEACH AND KEWAUNEE Location TWO RIVERS, Wl Docket(s) 50-266; 50-301; 50-305 CCENiecordsiof conversaitions or receipt-------- .f f-leain ol o h olvn Weat ii Inornaohasa 1.on. thsconlr.." i~nu'. 'bt'I a4iqy c~~e aonsi shouldk the folowin The CI prefaced the1)two goome out there that peopleviolations. 0 two concerns were theconcerns withatthe Cl .. th~ statement
'we have got that the callthat pape~rwork pertained showy~ to issues of security The
........ . ... co c u e by s a i g t a ý h a s g o n e th ro u g h th e NMC employee concerns program, through security, and through other avenues and now has come to us. He requested a return call. He did not mention Point Beach, only Kewaunee and NMC.
- 2. When did the concern occur?
Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the Cf. I passed the above information on to Terry Madeda, Wednesday morning.
3.Is this an ongoing concern?
Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the CI.
- 4. Who was involved?
Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the CI.
- 5. Were there any witnesses?
Unknown-i have not talked to or attempted to call the CI.
6.What Is the Potential safety impact?
Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the CI.
Information in this record was deleted I in accordance with the Freedom of Inforiation Act. exemotions "2e-/,Ov.. I/C ?>.-.N FDIW - 7e/-'6.*/
- 7. Ask the Cl what requirement/regulation does the individual believe governs this concern? (If the Cl does not have this information, please document this response. If the CI does not provide this information and the individual receiving the allegation can obtain the information within the 3 day deadline for forwarding the information to EICS. the information should be provided by the NRC staff member)
Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the Cl.
- 8. Ask the Cl what records should the NRC review?
Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the Cl.
- 9. Ask the Cl what other individuals could the NRC contact for information?
Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the Cl.
- 10. How did the Individual find out about the concern?
Unknown--I have not talked to or attempted to call the CI.
- 11. Was the concern brought to management's attention? if so, what actions have been taken: if not, why not?
The Cl stated that (s)he has gone through the NMC employee concerns program and through security. I spoke with Zach Dunham, the resident at Kewaunee, who recalled seeing a condition report last week that pertained to
ýbut remembers no specifies.
- 12. Was a condition report (or other corrective action document) initiated in response to the issue? If so, what was the resolution?
As stated above for question 11, apparently a condition report may have been written at Kewaunee.
- 13. Is the Individual satisfied with the licensee's response? If not, why?
Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the Cl.
- 14. If the licensee has not responded, does the individual wish to wait on the licensee's response before NRC pursues the Issue? If not, why? Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the Cl.
- 15. What does the Individual believe NRC should do In regard to this concern? Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the CI.
Dtsrml azn-iý In r fýC R Ienq ic ig aps~~~ohr r)fo d ~rc dsrout dtn antfifkws~aegg ~poepe ctW> ~Ijg'oa~iso eiit~
- 1. Does the concern Involve There was 2. Was the Individual advised of the DOL discrimination? If so, was the alleger no mention process and the 180 day restriction on informed that identity will be released of filing? No-I have not talked to or during an investigation? discriminatio attempted to call the CI.
n In the phone answering machine message.
- 3. What adverse actions have been taken? When?
Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the Cl.
- 4. Why does the individual believe the actions were taken as a result of engagino In a protected activity?
Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the CI.
5.What does the Individual believe was the Protected activity?
Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the Cl.
What safety Issues did the individual raise? When? (DOCUMENT ABOVE)
Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the CI.
Did you contact the NRC about these safety issues> Was/Is you management aware that you informed the NRC? Unknown-I have not talked to or attempted to call the Cl.
Preference for method and Unknown Was the individual advised No-I have not talked to or time of contact of limitations on Identity ý attempted to call the CI.
protection that If the concehns are referred to ther iense t? ti nde t the thoroughnessýand adequaey ofe lh icensee's responise. If the concen ar nareetsae Issue or tee or ae call tate CI Rosteidvda f tesserinvo ctve an eferral?bett
.Doesth n o ther agency, Uk Unknwn- no tht Whe e e inIniiulojc ivirefert concern (o tha e eesnhnnw Uppnopwate Iftelleger agr6es wei~lpoiet~lerslentiy, o fllovwip, by the agreeme~ntsItate or talke or .,a r~e~ t6NPwl alkaedt o o ther agenpy.
Does the individual object to referral? Unknown-I Does the Individual object to releasing Unknown-t have not their identity? have not talked to or talked to or attempted to attempted to call the Cl. call the Cl.
If the issue involves another agency, Unknown-i Was the Individual Informed that Unknown-I does the Individual object to referral to have not objecting to referral to another agency have not the ag ency and release of identity to that talked to or Imight Impact review of the concern? talked to or agency? attempted to attempted to call the Cl. call the Cl.
0rov ide25)dihe S22-3O, Sq*Cllai4iththe the" 6AC cpntact
- aI~ebation infoima66o (nmsof process a*r t) ahdR fi entceee grI swlchirdnubr(100 within3O e hilothNRC.'.rolon e o w9I r l,*e~)(Cl leAte i . nowle
. dl.. M ys And, Iii/11e Advised of NRC's-resolution oftahe itue(s)!vla letter.)-~
From: Terry Madeda To: James Heller Date: Wed, Jul 3, 2002 12:50 PM
Subject:
ALLEGATION FOLLOWUP FROM INFORMATION PROVIDED TO MIKE KUNOWSKI On this date I received a call from M. Kunowski regarding information on the residents voice mail at the Point Beach site. Mike indicated that a named individual left a voice mail on 712/02 that
identified two security related concerns of a general nature. The Cl left a telephone number for followup. On this date, based on Jim Heller's request, I contacted the Cl to discuss the concerns.
The first concern involved a potential FFD issue. The Cl indicated that he/she and several other craft employees were being unjustly accused that they failed to report the smell of alcohol on a foreman while being employed as craft employees during the steam generator project at Kewaunee. The Cl stated that they did report the issue to their supervisor, that but the supervisor took no action. Our review of this issue determined that the concern that the supervisor took no action was depositioned and closed in allegation AMS 2001 -A-01 76, and in addition during our review of the licensee's response we also identified a potential wrongdoing issue that allegedly involved several craft personnel not reporting the smell of alcohol on a foreman. As identified in our memo to B. Clayton dated 3/11/02, we recommended that this issue be referred to 01 for their review. This FFD concern is apparently related to Of's current investigation. We recommend that the above information be forwarded to 01 for their review and evaluation.
In his writeup Mike Kunowski will provide the Cl's name and telephone numbers. I have the Cl's home address.